There are many types and articulating surfaces in acetabular cups. Most of the designs currently available are modular, the liner snapping into a locking mechanism of some type. These modular inserts may be polyethylene, usually highly crosslinked polyethylene, or ceramic. Metal shells used in metal-on-metal devices are usually of a monoblock design. The elliptical monoblock design has been available for 20 years and was originally made of Titanium with a compression molded polyethylene liner. Tantalum (trabecular metal) was used as the shell material in the more recent designs and the polyethylene is actually molded directly into the tantalum framework. Monoblock acetabular components have a number of advantages. They do not allow access to the ilium because there are no holes in the socket shell with the monoblock construct. They require no locking mechanism which may increase metallic debris. No back surface liner wear can occur because all motion is eliminated at the liner/shell interface. However, because of this absence of screw holes there is an inability to visualise the floor of the acetabulum and perfect coaptation between the shell and the acetabular floor may not occur. The presence of dome gaps of greater than 1.5 mm have been noted in 5% of these components but these have not compromised implant stability and in a review of over 600 cups there has been no change in implant position. Results with over 258 monoblock cups with a minimum of 10-year follow-up (10–15 years) have been excellent. (Poultsides, et al) The incidence of pelvic osteolysis was not seen in any patient in this series. There were 3 revisions for instability but none for mechanical failure. There were 3 femoral revisions for loosening but the cup was intact and not revised in these patients. Utilizing the Livermore measurement method polyethylene wear averages 0.08 mm per year (0.06 – 0.13 mm) and there have been no revisions for wear. Radiographic evaluation demonstrates stable bony interface in all patients. At minimum 10- year follow-up the monoblock acetabular component with compression molded polyethylene confirms the theoretical advantages of this design and results have been excellent. Moen et al have demonstrated no osteolysis in CT scans in tantalum monoblock cups at a follow up of 10.3 years

There are many types and articulating surfaces in acetabular cups. Most of the designs currently available are modular, the liner snapping into a locking mechanism of some type. These modular inserts may be polyethylene, usually highly crosslinked polyethylene, or ceramic. Metal shells used in metal on metal devices are usually of a monoblock design. The elliptical monoblock design has been available for 20 years and was originally made of Titanium with a compression molded polyethylene liner. Tantalum (trabecular metal) was used as the shell material in the more recent designs and the polyethylene is actually molded directly into the tantalum framework. Monoblock acetabular components have a number of advantages. They do not allow access to the ilium because there are no holes in the socket shell with the monoblock construct. They require no locking mechanism which may increase metallic debris. No back surface liner wear can occur because all motion is eliminated at the liner/shell interface. However, because of this absence of screw holes there is an inability to visualise the floor of the acetabulum and perfect coaptation between the shell and the acetabular floor may not occur. The presence of dome gaps of greater than 1.5mm have been noted in 5% of these components but these have not compromised implant stability and in a review of over 600 cups there has been no change in implant position. The elliptical shape of the cup makes the mouth of the acetabular component 2mm greater than the dome so that an exceptionally strong acetabular rim fit results. Results with over 258 monoblock cups with a minimum of 10-year follow up (10–15 years) have been excellent (Poultsides, et al.). The incidence of pelvic osteolysis was not seen in any patient in this series. There were 3 revisions for instability but none for mechanical failure. There were three femoral revisions for loosening but the cup was intact and not revised in these patients. Utilising the Livermore measurement method polyethylene wear averages 0.08mm per year (0.06mm-0.13mm) and there have been no revisions for wear. Radiographic evaluation demonstrates stable bony interface in all patients. At minimum 10-year follow up the monoblock acetabular component with compression molded polyethylene confirms the theoretical advantages of this design and results have been excellent. Moen et al. have demonstrated no osteolysis in CT scans in tantalum monoblock cups at a follow up of 10.3 years

There are many types of articulating surfaces in uncemented acetabular cups. Most of the designs currently available are modular, with the shell snapping into a locking mechanism of some type. An Elliptical Monoblock design has been available for 15 years and was originally made of titanium with a factory assembled compression molded polyethylene liner. Porous tantalum (trabecular metal) was used as the shell material in a subsequent more recent design and in this design the polyethylene is actually molded directly into the tantalum framework.

Monoblock acetabular components do not allow particulate access to the ilium via screw holes and require no surgeon assembled locking mechanism which may increase backside wear and metallic debris. There are no holes in the socket because of the monoblock construct. Because of this absence of screw holes there is an inability to visualise the floor of the acetabulum and perfect coaptation between the shell and the acetabular floor may not occur. The presence of dome gaps of greater than 1.5mm have been noted in 5% of these components but these have not compromised implant stability and in a review of over 600 cups there has been no change in implant position. The Elliptical shape of the cup makes the mouth of the acetabular component 2mm greater than the dome so that an exceptionally strong acetabular rim fit results.

Results will be reported from two major institutional series with a minimum 10-year follow-up (range 10–15 years). No pelvic osteolysis was not seen in any patient in either series. In the HSS series of 250 cases with minimum 10 year follow up there were 4 revisions for instability but none for mechanical failure. There were three femoral revisions for loosening but the cup was intact and not revised in these patients. Utilising the Livermore measurement method polyethylene wear averages 0.8mm per year (0.6mm-1.3mm) and there have been no revisions for wear. Radiographic evaluation demonstrates stable bony interface in all patients. In a Mayo series of prospectively randomised patients also at minimum 10 years there was no lysis and only one case of aseptic loosening in a beaded titanium cup. At minimum 10-year follow up two similar elliptical monoblock cementless acetabular component designs with compression molded polyethylene have confirmed the theoretical advantages of this design concept and demonstrate long term results that have been excellent to date.

The use of cementless acetabular components is currently the gold standard for treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration. Monoblock acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup with the liner moulded into the metal shell, minimizing potential backside wear and eliminating the chance of mal-seating. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of a modular cup with that of a monoblock cup, with particular interest in the advent of lucent lines and their correlation with clinical outcomes. In this multi-surgeon, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 86 patients undergoing unilateral THA were recruited. Participants were randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA)- and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing (n=42). The porous-coated cup had an average pore size of 250 microns with an average volume porosity of 45%, whereas the monoblock shell had an average pore size of 300 microns with an average volume porosity of 48% and a HA coating thickness of 80 nm. There were no baseline demographic differences between both groups regarding sex, age, body mass index (BMI), or American Society of Anaesthesia (ASA) class (p>0.05). All of the sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Hip Score, were available for evaluation at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. A radiolucent distance between the cup and acetabulum of ≥0.5 mm was defined as gap if it was diagnosed from outset or as radiolucency if it had sclerotic edges and was found on progressive x-ray analyses. Thirty-two gaps (69%) were found in the modular cup group and 28 (6%) in the monoblock one (p=0.001). Of the former, 17 filled the gaps whereas 15 turned into a radiolucency at final assessment. Of the latter, only 1 of the gaps turned into a radiolucency at final follow-up (p 0.05) in both groups. Only the porous-coated cup was an independent predictor of lucent lines (OR:0.052, p=0.007). No case underwent revision surgery due to acetabular loosening during the study period. Only 2 cases of squeaking were reported in the CoC monoblock shell. Both porous-coated modular and hydroxyapatite-coated monoblock cups showed successful clinical results at short-term follow-up, however, the former evidenced a significantly higher rate of radiolucent line occurrence, without any association with PROMs. Since these lines indicate the possibility of future cup loosening, longer follow-up and assessment are necessary

Introduction. The aim of this study is to report the results of Revision hip arthroplasty using large diameter, metal on metal bearing implants- minimum 2 year follow up. Methods. A single centre retrospective study was performed of 22 consecutive patients who underwent acetabular revision surgery using metal on metal bearing implants between 2004 and 2007. Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) cup was used in all patients - monoblock, uncemented, without additional screws in 16 cases and cemented within reinforcement or reconstruction ring in 6 cases. Femoral revisions were carried out as necessary. Results. There were 16 men and 6 women with a mean age of 71 years (51-83). Revision surgery was performed for aseptic loosening in 10, infected primary hip arthroplasty in 8, infected Hemiarthroplasty in 1 and Peri-prosthetic fracture with loosening in 3 patients. A 2-stage revision was performed for all infected hips. One patient died and the remaining 21 patients had clinical and radiological assessment at a mean 35 months (24-60). The mean Harris hip score was 75 (23-98) with 50% good to excellent results. Only 1 patient had further revision to a proximal femoral replacement and constrained cup in 2 stages for recurrent infection at 24 months. There were 2 recurrent infections (both revised for septic loosening) and 1 non-union of trochanteric osteotomy. There were no dislocations in the group. No radiological loosening of implants or metal ion complications have been seen at last follow up. Conclusions. We believe this is the first reported series on the use of large diameter metal on metal bearing surfaces for revision hip arthroplasty. Our series shows satisfactory short to medium term results in this complex group of patients with no component loosenings, despite monoblock cups and no dislocations

Modern prosthetic stem construction strives to achieve the attractive goals of stress shielding prevention and optimal osteointegration. PhysioLogic stem is a new generation composite isoelastic femoral stem consisting of titanium core sheathed in implantable PEEK polymer and coated with titanium layer. This construction combines the benefits of both stress shielding prevention, due to its elasticity under bending load corresponding closely to that of natural bone, and rapid osteointegration, due to the stem's titanium coating. The aim of this study is long-term clinical progress evaluation and retrospective analysis in patients undergoing primary PhysioLogic stem implantation at our institution. From 1998 to 2003, we performed 51 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) operations with implantation of PhysioLogic Stem at our institution. Indications for THA included osteoarthritis (21), hip dysplasia (14), rheumatoid arthritis (10), and femoral neck nonunion (6). In all patients we used totally uncemented system — PhysioLogic Stem and monoblock cup with different types of bearing surface articulation (40 metal/polyethylene, 3 ceramic/polyethylene, and 8 metal/metal). In all cases head size was 28mm. Two patients died in the early post-op period at day 1 and day 9 from disseminated intravascular coagulation and pulmonary embolism, respectively, and were excluded from subsequent analysis. Analyzed patients included 20 women and 29 men; median age 45, range 21–69. Post-operatively, the patients were evaluated at 3 and 6 months, 1 year, and yearly thereafter. Median follow-up period was 14 years, range 11 to 16 years. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated by Harris Hip Score. Bone density in Gruen's and Charnley's zones was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Four patients died at 5–8 years postoperatively from cardiac causes. Two patients underwent revision surgery: one patient underwent “dry revision” due to hip dislocation with exchange for longer head while keeping the original PhysioLogic stem in place; second patient underwent stem removal after chronic periprosthetic infection. Among the 45 patients with surviving PhysioLogic Stem, 33 patients (75%) underwent subsequent contralateral total hip arthroplasty with standard uncemented stems types Spotorno or Zweymuller. These patients were surveyed at postoperative evaluation about subjective comparative performance of PhysioLogic Stem versus standard stem. Twenty seven patients (82%) reported the PhysioLogic stem to be equivalent or superior to the standard stem, with 15 patients (45%) rating the PhysioLogic stem as subjectively more comfortable than the standard stem. The average Harris hip score improved from 40 points preoperatively (range 27 to 48) to 93 points (range 89 to 95) at the time of final follow-up. All stems continue to show adequate bone-ingrown fixation with no radiological signs of aseptic loosening to date. The PhysioLogic stem removed in the aforementioned case of chronic periprosthetic infection also showed clear signs of good osteointegration. Our study showed that the PhysioLogic stem implantation resulted in favorable clinical and functional performance at long-term follow-up, making it an attractive alternative to standard stems

Pure tantalum has been proposed in orthopaedic surgery. Its chemical and physical properties have been widely studied in the past. From pure tantalum is obtained a spongy structure (Trabecular Metal Technology: TMT) that shows a full thickness porosity which is 2–3 times higher compared to other surfaces available for bone ingrowth with a three-dimensional porous arrangement in rough trabeculae. Pores (average diameter of 650 mm) are fully interconnected and represent 75–80% of the whole volume. TMT acetabular components have an elliptical shape and have an irregular external surface which both allow an optimal mechanical fit. We retrospectively reviewed 212 cases of monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup (Hedrocel, Stratec) implanted between 1999 and 2003 in a single centre with a minimum follow-up of 9–10 years; There were 98 men and 114 women, with an average age of 65 years. They all underwent primary or revision total hip arthroplasty or to acetabular component revision alone. In all patients a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular component with polyethylene directly compression molded into cup, with or without peripheral holes for screws, was implanted. In all primary procedures the same femoral stem (Synergy, Smith and Nephew) was implanted. All patients were evaluated with a clinical examination (Harris Hip Score: HHS) and with standard radiographs of the pelvis preoperatively and 1, 3, 6 months and yearly postoperatively. The stability of the acetabular cup was determined by modified Engh's criteria. The HHS score improved from 42 preoperatively to 94 after one year; at 13 years follow-up it was 95. The subjective outcome was widely satisfying, with the majority of patients experimenting good functional recovery and return to daily activities. Osteointegration of the acetabular component was present in all X-rays controls at one year after surgery. All post-operative evidence of residual bone loss (geodes, bone defects in revisions and in displasia) were no more radiographically evident after 1 year postoperatively as the host bone quickly filled these gaps. We did not observe osteolysis nor progressive radiolucent lines at the latest follow-up. None of the cups was revised, except 3 cases, revised for infection. Both clinical and radiographic results are the same or even superior to those of coated implants. Our experience confirms that trabecular metal tantalum cups can avoid the formation of bone-implant interface membrane and consequently can avoid implant loosening. The most important advantages of TMT monoblock cups are: no potential for polyethylene backside wear, prevention of loosening and osteolysis, increased early fixation via friction, improved late biological stability, maximum bone-implant contact. High biocompatibility of porous tantalum and its elastic modulus very close to bone influence positively earlier and wider osteointegration of the implant. Larger series are needed to confirm the positive our preliminary results

The introduction of a new implant material is not without risk. A series of worst-case scenarios were developed and tested accordingly to answer questions such as: what will happen if the implant is not placed in a good orientation? What will happen to the material after a long implantation time, e.g. 20 or more years?. To reach a higher level of safety, a new approach for the preclinical testing has been taken. The vitamys® material (a novel vitamin-doped HXLPE) followed a severe pre-clinical testing protocol, including mechanical, tribological and biocompatibility testing. The testing includes a comparison of vitamys® vs. standard-UHMWPE and other HXLPE after accelerated ageing for periods equivalent to 20 and 40 years in-vivo. Hip simulator testing was done at inclination angles from 35° to 65° to assess the “forgiveness” of the material for mal-orientation. Comparing the test results to published data, it becomes evident that the vitamin addition and the sequence of the manufacturing steps both have a significant effect of the resulting mechanical, ageing and wear properties. In contrast to UHMWPE or HXLPE without antioxidant, the vitamys material behaves in a very “forgiving” manner: Hip simulator testing of vitamys at high inclination angles and even with severely aged material revealed no increase of wear rates. The vitamys material was first introduced in a monoblock polyethylene cup with a thin Ti-particle coating, the RM-Pressfit vitamys® acetabular cup (Mathys Ltd Bettlach, Switzerland). Its first implantation occurred in Sept. 2009. Since then, a total of nearly 500 implantations have been documented in a prospective multi-centre clinical study involving 11 clinics in 5 countries (CH, DE, FR, NL and NZ). Based on the pre-clinical testing and its first clinical experience, we have reason to believe that the RM-Pressfit vitamys® possesses interesting and unique features such as high elasticity (no stress-shielding), high ageing and wear resistance combined with clinically proven biological anchorage – making it theoretically suitable for a whole range of patients, including the young and active

Introduction. Current standard cups of metal on metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA) have no dome holes and it is very difficult for surgeons to confirm full seating of these cups. This sometimes results in gap formation between the cup and acetabular floor. Although the incidence of initial gaps using modular press-fit cups with dome screw holes has been reported to range from 20 to 35%, few studies have reported the incidence of gap formation with monoblock metal cups and its clinical consequences in RHA. The purpose of this study was to investigate retrospectively the incidence of initial gap formation and whether the initial gap influences the clinical results in RHA. Material and Method. RHA was performed on 166 hips of 146 patients using the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) (MMT, UK) between 1998 and 2007. Mean age at operation was 48.7 years (range, 19-85 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 6.9 years (2.0-10.6). Acetabular reaming was performed with the use of hemispherical reamers and the reamer size was increased up to an odd number diameter which provided tight rim fit in the antero-posterior direction. The same size hemispherical provisional cup with dome holes and slits was used to check the cavity for complete seating. If the provisional cup could not be seated on the floor, reaming was repeated with the same reamer to remove the rim bump until full seating was achieved. Acetabular cups of 1mm larger diameter were impacted into the acetabulum by a press-fit technique. After press-fit fixation, the stability of the cups was confirmed with a synchronized movement of the pelvis and the cup inserter by applying a gentle torque. Clinical evaluation was performed using WOMAC at the latest follow-up. Radiographic assessments were performed using radiographs immediately after the surgery, at 3 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and then annually thereafter. We evaluated the height of the gap between the cup and acetabular surface, cup inclination angle, cup migration and the time to gap filling. To investigate the relationship between the magnitude of the gap and the radiographic results, the patients were divided into two groups according to the height of the initial gap; the cases with a gap of less than 3 mm on the initial radiograph were grouped into a small gap group, the cases with a gap of 3mm or more were grouped into a large gap group. We compared the changes in the height of the gap, in the cup inclination angle and the cup migration between the groups. Results. Gaps were identified in 21 of 166 hips (13%) on the postoperative radiograph. The average height of the gaps was 2.4 mm (0.56-4.5mm). Of the 21 hips with gaps, there was no revision during the follow up period. 12 of the 21 hips were classified into the small gap group, 9 of the 21 hips were classified into the large gap group. In the small gap group, there were no changes of cup inclination angle of more than 3 degrees nor was there cup migration of more than 3mm. On the other hand, in the large gap group, 6 of the 9 hips showed reductions of the cup inclination angle of more than 3 degrees with 3mm or more of migration during the initial 3 months (P<0.05). After 3 months, neither progressive angle change nor migration of the cup were observed. All acetabular components were judged to be bone ingrown at the last follow up. Conclusions. The incidence of initial postoperative gaps (13%) of this series is similar to that of modular cementless cups fixed with press-fit technique. There were no serious clinical consequences of the initial gap during the 6.9 year follow up. However, gaps of 3mm or more led to early migration of the acetabular component and change in inclination angle