Background. Second-generation high-carbon CoCrMo-alloy metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA) was introduced in the late 1980s following reports of early loosening, impingement, pronounced wear, and hypersensitivity in the first-generation
Introduction. A recent review of the literature on metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THA) revealed the lack of comparative clinical studies with a sufficient sample size and the inclusion of patient-reported outcomes as well as patient activity levels. Methods. We conducted a prospective cohort study including all
Background. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has seen a recent revival with third generation
Introduction. Hip wear simulation is a widely used technique for the pre-clinical evaluation of new bearing designs. However, wear rates seen in vitro can often be significantly different to those seen clinically. This can be attributed to the difference between the optimal conditions in a simulator and wide ranging conditions in real patients. This study aimed to develop more clinically relevant simulator tests, looking specifically at the effects of cup inclination angle (in vivo) and stop-dwell-start (SDS) protocols on a clinically available product. Method. Five tests using a Paul type walking cycle (ISO 14242) were carried out on two ProSim hip simulators:
. 28mm MoM, standard walking, cup inclination 45°, (n = 5). 36mm MoM, standard walking, cup 45°, (n = 4). 36mm MOM, SDS: 10 walking cycles and pause of 5s with stance load of 1250N cup 45°, (n = 5). 36mm MOM, SDS: 10 walking cycles and pause of 30s with stance load of 1250N, (n = 5) cup 45°. 36mm MOM, standard walking, cup 55°(n = 5), and 65°(n = 5). All samples had matched clearances, measured using a CMM (Prismo Navigator, Zeiss, Germany). Wear was measured gravimetrically (Sartorius ME235S: 0.01mg). Results and Discussion.
Early failure of
MHRA guidance for patients with metal on metal hip replacements (MOM) was provided in 2012 and updated in 2017 to assist in the early detection of soft tissue reactions due to metal wear debris. A large number of metal on metal hip replacements were undertaken at our trust. A program of recall for all patients with metal on metal hip replacements was undertaken and MHRA guidelines implemented. Identification and recall of all patients from 2001 with MOM hip replacements using theatre logs, patient records and consultant log books. Two consultant review of X-rays and patient records. Postal questionnaires and GP requests for cobalt & chromium blood tests. Two consultant led MOM review clinics undertaken with metal artefact reduction scans (MARS) performed following consultation in 2017. 674 patients, 297 available for review. 59 refused follow up. 87 moved out of area, 36 untraceable, 26 not MOM, 147 RIP, 22 already revised. From 297 patients 126 female, 171 male, age range 39 – 95 yrs. 126 resurfacing, 171 MOM THR. 26 patients with elevated metal ions, MARS performed of which 17 positive, 9 negative. Of 17 positive scans 10 patients asymptomatic, 7 waiting revision. A time consuming effort and additional resource was needed and supported by the trust. From 297 hips 17 positive MARs were identified (5.7%). A new database registry has been developed to track MOM patients, clinics set up for ongoing follow up with radiological protocols for imaging. An arthroplasty advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) is now trained reviewing patients independently.
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MOMHR) is a good surgical indication for young active patients. However, it cannot be used in patients with an excessively short femoral head/neck. To address these cases, a new surgical technique has been developed comprising femoral head augmentation using impacted morcellized bone grafts. 32 osteoarthritis patients who had severe congenital insufficiency of the femoral head/neck were treated with MOMHR combined with femoral head augmentation. Mean patient age was 49 ± 9 years (18–66). The required amount of augmentation was calculated on preoperative X-rays and confirmed during surgery. Using specially designed instrumentation, bone chips produced while reaming the socket and trimming the head were impacted onto the head to achieve the desired reconstruction and lengthening. Finally, the femoral component was cemented.Introduction
Methods
Hip wear simulator test results could be affected by many non-bearing related factors such as fixation surface conditions, equipment calibration and component set-up. In an effort to improve the accuracy, reliability and repeatability of hip simulator test, a quality management system has been established at the IDC hip tribology laboratory, which has been accredited by UKAS (United Kingdom Accreditation Service) in accordance with the recognised international standard ISO17025. This study demonstrates that under well-controlled laboratory and testing conditions, satisfactory repeatability can be achieved during hip simulator studies. Between 2008 to 2010, ten 50 mm Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) devices were tested by the IDC tribology laboratory using two ProSim hip wear simulators in three different tests (T1, T2 and T3). All tests were performed following the same IDC testing protocols at 1 Hz frequency for 5 million cycles (Mc) or until after a steady state was reached. Paul type stance phase loadings with a maximum load of 3 kN and a swing phase load of 0.3 kN was used. The flexion and extension angles were 30 and 15 degree. The internal/external rotation angel was ±10 degree. Wear was measured gravimetrically using an analytical balance (Mettler, Toledo xp504) with an accuracy of 0.1 mg.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Introduction. Alternative bearings –
INTRODUCTION. Ceramic-on-metal hip replacements (COM, where the head is a Biolox Delta ceramic and liner is Co Cr alloy), have demonstrated reduced wear under standard conditions in vitro compared to
Introduction. Large diameter metal on metal cups have been used in total hip arthroplasty advocating superior results with respect to dislocation rates, range of motion and long term survival. The Durom cup used as part of the Durom hip resurfacing system has been incriminated with poor short term results sometimes correlated to incorrect positioning of either the femoral or acetabular component. Our objective was to evaluate short term results of the Durom cup used in conjunction with standard stems. Methods. We prospectively followed all patients with a large diameter
Background. An increased incidence of periprosthetic osteolysis, resulting in loss of biologic fixation, has been recently reported in contemporary THAs with low-carbide
Background. Pseudotumours have been associated with
In a randomized study of 60 patients allergic reactions are evaluated in three joint prosthesis groups, a resurfacing arthroplasty (ReCap), a non-cemented, large
Introduction. Due to the commercial launch of newly developed ceramic-on-metal (COM) bearings, we compared the deformation and stresses in the liner with ceramic-on-ceramic (COC),
INTRODUCTION. Although simulation studies have shown superior wear properties of
Introduction.
INTRODUCTION. Femoral neck narrowing (NN) following
Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur may be required to treat primary bone tumours or destructive metastases either with impending or established pathological fracture. Modular prostheses are available off the shelf and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for this purpose. We have assessed the clinical and functional outcome of using the METS (Stanmore Implants Worldwide) modular tumour prosthesis to reconstruct the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients between 2001 and 2006. We compared the results with the published series for patients managed with modular and custom-made endoprosthetic replacements for the same conditions. There were 52 males and 48 females with a mean age of 56.3 years (16 to 84) and a mean follow-up of 24.6 months (0 to 60). In 65 patients the procedure was undertaken for metastases, in 25 for a primary bone tumour, and in ten for other malignant conditions. A total of 46 patients presented with a pathological fracture, and 19 presented with failed fixation of a previous pathological fracture. The overall patient survival was 63.6% at one year and 23.1% at five years, and was significantly better for patients with a primary bone tumour than for those with metastatic tumour (82.3% vs 53.3%, respectively at one year (p = 0.003)). There were six early dislocations of which five could be treated by closed reduction. No patient needed revision surgery for dislocation. Revision surgery was required by six (6%) patients, five for pain caused by acetabular wear and one for tumour progression. Amputation was needed in four patients for local recurrence or infection. The estimated five-year implant survival with revision as the endpoint was 90.7%. The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage score was 61% (51% to 95%). The implant survival and complications resulting from the use of the modular system were comparable to the published series of both custom-made and other modular proximal femoral implants. We conclude that at intermediate follow-up the modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur replacement provides versatility, a low incidence of implant-related complications and acceptable function for patients with metastatic tumours, pathological fractures and failed fixation of the proximal femur. It also functions as well as a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement.