Abstract
Introduction
Large diameter metal on metal cups have been used in total hip arthroplasty advocating superior results with respect to dislocation rates, range of motion and long term survival. The Durom cup used as part of the Durom hip resurfacing system has been incriminated with poor short term results sometimes correlated to incorrect positioning of either the femoral or acetabular component. Our objective was to evaluate short term results of the Durom cup used in conjunction with standard stems.
Methods
We prospectively followed all patients with a large diameter metal-on-metal articulation (Durom) and a standard stem operated upon between 9/2004 and 9/2008. Patients were seen at follow-up for a clinical (Harris hip score=HHS, UCLA scale and patient satisfaction), radiographic and questionnaire assessment.
Results
89 primary THAs in 80 patients (74% men) with a mean age of 52 (±12) years were included. Main diagnoses were primary osteoarthritis in 47% and aseptic necrosis in 35%. An uncemented stem was used in 79%. Overall, 80 THAs were controlled at a mean follow-up of 39 months (range 16–67 months), 4 patients were lost to follow-up and 5 patients refused or were unable to attend the visit. However, none of the 5 underwent revision. Overall, 8 THAs (8/85, 9.4%) were revised in mean 28 months (range 8–60) after the operation. One additional patient was awaiting revision for aseptic loosening of both cup and stem. The reasons for revision were aseptic loosening in three cases, presence of a granuloma (histological diagnosis of ALVAL) in three, deep infection in one and impingement in one case. Radiographic analysis revealed linear (n=2) and focal (n=3) osteolysis as well as early cup migration (n=2). In 5 revised patients no radiographic changes were found. 56 (70%) of the 80 patients with follow-up had a HHS between 80 and 100. Among those who were not revised, the mean HHS improved from 55.2 to 88.4 (mean increase 33.2, 95% CI 27.7; 38.7). The mean activity level (UCLA scale) at follow-up was 6.4 (±1.8). Overall, mild to severe pain was reported in 14 cases and occasional pain in 22. Groin pain was present in 18 patients (22.5%), 7 of them belonged to the revised group. 61 (76.3%) of the 80 patients with follow-up were satisfied. Mean patient satisfaction on the VAS scale among those who were not revised was 9.0 (±1.3).
Conclusion
This study confirms the increased short-term revision rate of the large diameter metal-on-metal couple (Durom) reported by others. In all revision cases the retrieved cups showed no osteo-integration and were removed easily. The operative indication for revision was based upon groin pain and patient dissatisfaction. Radiographic signs of implant loosening were not always present even though in all revised cases except for one the cup was found loose.
