Prior implant designs have relied on a four-bar link theory and featured J-curve femoral components intended to recreate femoral rollback of the native knee, but this design could lead to anterior femoral sliding or paradoxical motion. Recent kinematic analyses of the native human knee have shown the medial compartment to be more stable to anteroposterior translation than the lateral, resulting in a “medial pivot” motion as the knee flexes. “Medial pivot” designs in total knee arthroplasty were introduced in the 1990s to attempt to re-create this motion. They consist of an asymmetric tibial insert with a highly congruent medial compartment and less conforming lateral compartment. The femoral component has a single radius of curvature and a high degree of conformity. In vivo fluoroscopic studies have shown medial pivot designs to be successful in achieving its intended motion, while other cruciate-retaining designs had a higher incidence of paradoxical anterior translation and lateral condylar lift-off. Furthermore, numerous investigations have shown medial pivot designs to have excellent outcomes and survivorship at up to 10 years post-operatively. However, the contention in this debate that medial pivot designs avoid the need for ligament balancing is incorrect. Appropriate ligament balancing remains a crucial aspect of any successful total knee arthroplasty and is no less important based on the implant design utilised. In the Methods section of all prior reports using a medial pivot design, the authors have noted that appropriate ligament balancing was obtained both in flexion and extension consistent with the recommended technique with other primary TKA implant designs. From a kinematic standpoint, this makes absolute sense. If a patient has a valgus imbalance with loose medial structures, then as the knee is brought into flexion the femur will not maintain congruency and contact with the conforming tibial surface – thus the medial pivot motion will be lost. Thus, balancing remains critical. Lastly, although not the focal point of this debate, whether re-creation of a medial pivot motion in total knee arthroplasty actually improves patient outcomes remains an area of debate. A recent investigation by Warth and Meneghini, et al. demonstrated that re-creation of a medial-pivot pattern intra-operatively did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes at 1-year post-operatively. Thus, although the concept of a medial pivot design has merit, whether this will consistently improve outcomes and patient satisfaction remains to be seen

Introduction. The alternative kinematic alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims at restoring the native joint line orientation and laxity of the knee. The goal is to generate a more physiological prosthetic knee enabling higher functional performance and satisfaction for the patient. KA TKA have only been reported so far with cruciate retaining and posterior-stabilised designs. Similarly, medial pivot design for TKA has been recently developed to enable more natural knee kinematics and antero-posterior stability. The superiority of KA technique and medial pivot implant design is still controversial when compared to current practice. Our study aims to assess the value of KA TKA when performed with medial pivot implants. Methods. We conducted a retrospectively matched case-control study. Clinical data was prospectively collected on patients as part of an ongoing ODEP study. Thirty-three non-selected consecutive KA TKAs performed by the lead author were matched to a control group of 33 measured resection with mechanically aligned (MA) TKAs performed by other consultant surgeons. Patients were matched for sex, age, BMI and pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Pre-operative median OKS was 21 points (max 48), mean age was 69, mean BMI 31, and there were 21 female patients in both arms. The medial pivot GMK Sphere implant (Medacta, Switzerland) was used in all cases. OKS and EQ-5D scores were measured pre-operatively and at 1-year post-op. Patient outcome satisfaction scores were assessed at 1-year follow-up using a visual analogic scale (VAS). Pre- and post-operative knee radiographs were analysed using TraumaCad software. Results. No reoperation or revision was recorded in either group. KA patients were found to have higher OKS (median 44 Vs 42, p=0.78), satisfaction (median 99/100 Vs 90/100, p=0.28), and EQ-5D improvement (mean 0.34 Vs 0.28, p=0.21) compared to MA patients; however, none of the differences discovered were statistically significant. In addition, KA patients had a femoral component that was on average, 3.5° more valgus orientated (aLDFA 84° Vs 80°, p<0.05) and 2.1° more flexed (4.4° Vs 2.3°, p=NS), and a tibial component with 3.6° (aMPTA 86° Vs 89.6°, p<0.05) and 3.9° (5.5° Vs 1.6°, p<0.05) increased varus orientation and posterior slope, respectively. Conclusion/Discussion. KA TKA performed with medial pivot implant design has shown good safety and efficacy at early-term. The physiological implantation provided by the KA technique seems to be clinically beneficial compared to MA implantation, although, the measured differences did not show statistical significance. Having a low study power and high ceiling effect of outcome measure tools may partly explain our results. Early results for KA TKA are encouraging and longer follow-up is warranted to assess longevity of results. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. In total knee arthroplasty, the aim is to relieve pain and provide a stable, functional knee. Sagittal stability is crucial in enabling a patient to return to functional activities. Knee implants with a medial pivot (MP) design are thought to more accurately reproduce the mechanics of the native joint, and potentially confer greater antero-posterior stability through the range of flexion than some other implant designs. Aim. This study aims to compare the sagittal stability of four different total knee arthroplasty implant designs. Method. Comparison was made between four different implant designs: medial pivot (MP), two different types of cruciate retaining (CR1 and CR 2) and deep dish (DD). A cohort of 30 Medial Pivot (MP) knees were compared with matched patients from each of the other designs, 10 in each group. Patients were matched for age, body mass index and time to follow up. Clinical examination was carried out by an orthopaedic surgeon blinded to implant type, and sagittal stability was tested using a KT1000 knee arthrometer, applying 67N of force at 30˚ and 90˚. Results. The MP knee was more stable than the CR1 knee at both 30º (mean movement: 1.37mm vs 2.48mm, p=0.037) and 90º (1.68mm vs 2.37mm, p=0.030). The MP knee was more stable than the CR2 knee at 30º (0.98mm vs1.33mm, p=0.013). The MP knee also demonstrated less movement at 90 º (0.98mm vs 1.33mm), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.156). The MP knee was more stable than the DD knee at 30 º (0.48mm vs 1.33mm, p=0.03) and 90 º (0.67mm vs 1.15mm, p=0.048). Overall the medial pivot design was more stable than all non-medial pivot designs at 30 º (0.8mm vs1.66mm, p=0.003) and 90 º (1.1mm vs 1.61mm, p= 0.008). Conclusion. Overall, the medial pivot design demonstrated significantly greater antero-posterior stability than all other design types included in this study. Correlation with patient reported outcome scales will allow insight into whether these statistically significant differences are also clinically significant

Introduction. Joint kinematics following total knee replacement (TKR) is important as it affects joint loading, joint functionality, implant wear and ultimately patient comfort and satisfaction. It is believed that restoring the natural motion of the joint (such as the screw-home mechanism) with a medial pivot knee implant will improve clinical outcomes. Daily activities such as stair climbing and stair descent are among the most difficult tasks for these patients. This study analysed dynamic knee joint motion after implantation of a medial pivot knee implant using fluoroscopy during stair ascent and descent activity. Methods. Ethics approval was granted by Macquarie University to undertake fluoroscopic testing. Four patients who had undergone a TKR were asked to participate in the study. All patients were operated by a single surgeon (JS) and were implanted with a medial pivot knee prosthesis (Sphere, Medacta International). Participants were tested at the 12 month post-operative time- point. Participants were asked to step up or down a short stair-case at a comfortable self-selected speed. Fluroscopic images were taken using a flat panel Artis Zeego (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen) angiography system during the dynamic activity. Images were processed using Joint Track Auto (Banks, University of Florida), whereby the specific femoral and tibial component CAD files were superimposed onto the fluoroscopic images, ensuring an optimised match to the outlined components. Joint kinematics were calculated using custom written code in Matlab 2017a. Results. The average maximum flexion angle during stair ascent was 64° at the time when the foot had touched the step. The average minimum flexion angle during this activity was 7.9°. On average, the tibia externally rotated relative to the femur by 3.6° as the knee extended. During stair descent the average flexion angle changed from a minimum of 4.3° of flexion to a maximum of 29.3° of flexion. The average change in internal rotation between 10° flexion and 25° flexion was 1.05°. Conclusion. The stair ascent activity showed the joint to undergo the natural screw-home mechanism motion; experiencing 4° of internal rotation over a 57° flexion angle range. The stair descent activity exhibited a lower level of internal- external rotation. This may be due to a smaller flexion angle range during this activity as well other mechanisms such as motion adaptation of the patient when descending stairs, not related to implant design

INTRODUCTION. The purpose of TKA is to restore normal kinematics and functioning to diseased knees. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative kinematic data are correlated with minimum one-year outcomes following primary TKA. METHODS. We reviewed data on 185 consecutive primary TKAs in which sensor-embedded tibial trials were used to evaluate kinematic patterns following traditional ligament balancing. Procedures were performed by two board-certified arthroplasty surgeons. The same implant design and surgical approach was used for all knees. Contact locations on the medial and lateral condyles were recorded for each patient at 0°, 45° and 90° of flexion, and full flexion. Vector equations were created by contact locations on the medial and lateral sides and the vector intersections determined the center of rotation between each measurement position. Center of rotation was calculated as the average of vector intersections at 0 to 45°, 45 to 90°, and 90° to full flexion. If the average center of rotation was between 16 and 1000 mm of the contact location on the medial side it was considered a medial pivot knee. Knees were also classified as medial (16 to 200 mm on medial side), lateral (16 to 200 mm on lateral side), translating (> 200 mm medially or laterally), and other (< 16 mm on both medial and lateral sides). The new Knee Society Scoring System (KSSO objective score, KSSS satisfaction score, KSSF function score), the EQ-5D™ Health Status Index, and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Level Score were measured preoperatively and at minimum one-year follow-up (average 20.4 months). RESULTS. Thirty-three TKAs were excluded to eliminate potential bias due to sensor device malfunction, atypical hardware, unresurfaced patella, surgery at a non-study hospital, or early postoperative infection, revision due to aseptic loosening, ipsilateral hip disease, and subsequent neurologic disease or death unrelated to the index TKA, resulting in a final sample size of 152 knees. Twelve (7.9%) patients were lost to follow-up, and two were excluded due to outlier values for average center of rotation. Seventy-five percent of the final sample was female. Mean age and BMI were 63.6 years 33.9, respectively. Average center of rotation ranged from −1017 to 1562 mm with negative signifying the lateral side. Medial pivot knees comprised 40% (55) of the total sample. Sex, age, height, surgeon, implant side, and implant type were unrelated to pivot classification. Patient weight (100.2 vs. 90.9 kg; p = 0.012) and BMI (35.5 vs. 32.8; p = 0.044) were greater in medial pivot knees. Controlling for BMI, KSSO, KSSF, KSSS, EQ5D, UCLA, and pain scores at latest follow-up did not differ in medial and non-medial pivot knees (p ≥ 0.151). The amount of improvement in outcomes from preoperative baseline also did not differ in medial and non-medial pivot knees (p ≥ 0.161). Outcomes did not vary among knees with translating medial, lateral, and other pivots (p ≥ 0.065). DISCUSSION. Our results suggest that a medial pivot kinematic pattern may not be a substantial governor of clinical success

Postoperative stiffness is a relatively uncommon issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it can be a debilitating complication when it occurs. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is commonly used as the primary treatment modality following failed physiotherapy. The ADVANCE® Medial Pivot Knee (Wright Medical Technology) was created in an effort to prevent stiffness postoperatively and increase range of motion. The EVOLUTION® Medial Pivot Knee is a second generation design that builds upon the technology of the ADVANCE® knee. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 881 primary medial pivot knees (592 ADVANCE® knees, 289 EVOLUTION® knees). We theorized that the design changes made to the EVOLUTION® knees might contribute toward reducing the need for MUA. We found that the EVOLUTION® knees required significantly fewer manipulations under anesthesia (p = 0.036). The design modifications made to the EVOLUTION® knees may have contributed to the lower rate of MUA

Most total knee prostheses are designed to have limited congruence between the femoral and tibial components to reduce constraint, based on the widely accepted principle that “constraint causes loosening”. Studies of the normal knee, however, indicate that stability under axial load occurs mostly by the geometric conformity of the surfaces. When moving in the plane of flexion-extension, the ligaments contribute little to stability because the ligaments are in the “toe-region” of their force-displacement curve. When an “out-of-plane” load is applied (i.e., load outside the plane of flexion-extension), ligaments are “recruited” for stability by being stressed into the elastic portion of the curve to resist the load. For the traditional total knee prosthesis, because of the lack of geometric congruity, the ligaments must provide all stability by being “balanced”, i.e. tensioned into the elastic portion of the force-displacement curve. Further, they must remain in that tensioned state indefinitely, with no stretching or migration of the implant. The medial pivot knee design has a fully conforming medial “ball-in-socket” articulation that provides stability to the knee through the geometric conformity. Ligaments need not be tensioned into the elastic region of the force-displacement curve but can be left in the toe-region to be recruited for out-of-plane loads. Clinical follow-up results in patients with a medial pivot prosthesis indicate that, based on Knee Society and WOMAC scores, patients report greater than 90% satisfaction with pain and function. Further, the most satisfied patients are those who, during physical examination, display medial and lateral opening that might be classified as “mid-flexion instability” for prostheses that depend on ligament tensioning for stability

BACKGROUND. The need for post-operative manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty is a frustrating complication that can lead to suboptimal outcomes if range-of-motion to a functional level is not regained. Implant morphology and kinematics, PCL imbalance, and soft-tissue balancing can all contribute to post-operative stiffness. Utilization of total knee arthroplasty components that replicate the native knee's medial ball and socket kinematics may lead to easier maintenance of flexion post-operatively compared to conventional components. PURPOSE. To determine if a medial pivot total knee arthroplasty design can reduce the need for post-operative MUA after primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS. A retrospective chart review of primary total knee arthroplasties performed between 2013 and 2016 by a single fellowship-trained joint replacement surgeon was performed. Cases that met criteria for inclusion were: primary total knee arthroplasty, identifiable implant based on operative report and/or post-operative radiographs, immediate post-operative passive flexion against gravity of at least 110 degrees, and availability of post-operative follow-up notes documenting range-of-motion that was either satisfactory or necessitating need for MUA. The need for a MUA was deemed necessary if post-operative flexion was not beyond 90 degrees within six weeks of surgery. The percentage of patients requiring MUA for a group implanted with the EVOLUTION Medial Pivot System was compared to a group implanted with all other designs (Stryker Triathlon CR, PS, TS). RESULTS. One hundred fifty-six cases met criteria for inclusion and were reviewed. The Triathlon system was used predominantly in the first half of the study period and accounted for 65 (42%) of the cases performed. Six patients in this group underwent MUA and two patients required repeated MUA. An additional patient in the Triathlon group met the criteria for MUA but had other conditions which prevented the investigators from performing it. The percentage of patients who met the indication for MUA in the Triathlon group was 10.8%. The EVOLUTION system was used predominantly in the second half of the study period and accounted for 91 (58%) of the cases performed. There were two patients (2.2%) who met criteria for MUA and both patients subsequently underwent MUA. There was a statistically significant reduction in the number of patients meeting criteria for MUA in the EVOLUTION group compared with the Triathlon group (p=0.024). CONCLUSION. Utilization of a medial ball and socket design for primary total knee arthroplasty allows the polyethylene implant to control the position of the femur on the tibia. This design possibly allows for improved early maintenance of post-operative flexion, which may minimize the need for post-operative MUA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

In order to emulate normal knee kinematics more closely and thereby potentially improve wear characteristics and implant longevity the Medial Pivot type knee replacement geometry was designed. In the current study the clinical and radiographic results of 50 consecutive knee replacements using a Medial Pivot type knee replacement are reported; results are compared to the Australian Orthopaedic Associations National Joint Replacement Registry. The patients' data were crossed checked against the registry to see if they had been revised elsewhere. After a mean follow-up of 9.96 years results show that the Medial Pivot Knee replacement provides good pain relief and functional improvement according to KSS and Womac scores and on subjective patient questionnaires. There was one minor revision; insertion of a patella button at 6.64 years FU. There were no major revisions; all implants appeared to be well fixed on standard radiographic examination. While the revision rate for the Medial Pivot knee according to the Australia Joint Registry results is higher compared to all other types of knee replacements in the registry, and to what is reported in the literature on the medial pivot knee, it is not in the current series. Revision rate was similar to what is reported on in the literature, but after a longer follow-up period. However, long term follow-up is required to draw definitive conclusions on the longevity of this type of implant

The purpose of this study was to compare lower limb muscle activity in patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a medial pivot (MP) implant to healthy controls (CTRL) during a stair ascent task. Seven MP (age: 61.4±6.5 years, BMI: 30.0±4.7 kg/m2, 12.4±3.8 months post-surgery) patients who underwent a TKA performed using either a subvastus or medial parapatellar approach were age- and BMI-matched to seven healthy CTRL participants (age: 62.4±4.2 years, BMI: 26.3±2.7 kg/m2) for comparison in this study. Participants underwent electromyography (EMG) analysis while completing a three-step stairs ascent task. Portable wireless surface EMG probes were placed on the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris (BF) and semimembranous (SM) muscles of both lower limbs. Peak linear envelope (peakLE) and total muscle activity (iEMG) were extrapolated and normalised to a maximal voluntary contraction. Nonparametric Kruskal Wallace ANOVA tests were used and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to identify where significant (p < 0.05) differences occurred. The operated limb had significantly lower iEMG in the VAL, RF and BF muscles, and significantly lower peakLE in the SM muscle compared to the non-operated limb. The operated-limb of the MP group had significantly lower iEMG in the VAL and BF muscles, and significantly lower peakLE in the VAL, RF and SM muscles compared to the CTRL group. The non-operated limb in the MP group had significantly larger peakLE and iEMG in the RF muscle compared to the CTRL group. Differences in muscle activity between the operated and non-operated limbs in TKA patients with a MP implant demonstrates a compensatory strategy to reduce loading on the operated limb by relying on the non-operated limb. This same strategy has been reported in other studies investigating other functional tasks. This reliance on the non-operated limb resulted by having greater peakLE and iEMG in the RF muscle compared to the healthy CTRLs. These differences between limbs could also result from many years of muscle adaptation waiting to receive a knee replacement. In conclusion, TKA patients exhibit discrepancies in muscle activity compared to healthy knees and differences between operated and non-operated limbs. Post-surgery rehabilitation should rely on unilateral strength exercises of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles to reduce discrepancies to allow for a more balanced muscle activity between limbs

The purpose of this study was to compare lower limb joint mechanics in patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either a posterior stabilised (PS) or with a medial pivot (MP) implant to healthy controls (CTRL) during stair ascent and descent tasks. Six PS (age: 67.2±1.5 years, BMI: 31.0±3.2 kg/m2) and 11 MP (age: 62.3±6.0 years, BMI: 29.7±3.9 kg/m2) TKA patients matched to 10 healthy CTRL participants (age: 65.6±5.5 years, BMI: 27.2±5.0 kg/m2) were included in the study. TKA patients went through 3D motion analysis after unilateral TKA with either a MP (11.7±3.4 months post-surgery) or PS (10.1±3.4 months post-surgery) implant performed using either a subvastus or medial parapatellar approach. Kinematic and kinetic data was collected using a 10-camera Vicon and two portable Kistler force plates placed on the first and second stair of a three-step staircase. Nonparametric Kruskal Wallace ANOVA tests were used and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to identify where significant (p < 0.05) differences occurred. When comparing both stair tasks, stair ascent showed a larger number of significant differences in kinematic and kinetic variables than stair descent. Peak knee extension was significantly (p < 0.05) greater in both TKA groups compared to the CTRL during stair descent, whereas only the PS group had significantly (p = 0.02) greater knee extension angle than the CTRL during stair ascent. The PS group had a significantly (p = 0.01) lower peak knee extension moment than the CTRL group during both tasks and compared to the MP group during stairs ascent. During stair ascent, the MP group had significantly (p = 0.02) larger peak hip extension moments than both PS and CTRL group. Greater knee extension angles in TKA groups at foot strike during stair tasks support the notion that TKA groups exhibit stiff knee during stance to reduce or avoid shear displacement on the operated knee. This could also result from many years of muscle adaptation waiting to receive a knee replacement. Reduced peak knee extension moment in the PS group during stairs tasks showed a quadriceps deficiency that could increase the risk of revision or of other joint replacement on the contralateral side or ipsilateral hip. MP group reproduced similar joint loading patterns as the CTRLs which may reduce their risk of revision. In conclusion, TKA patients continue to exhibit discrepancies from healthy knee mechanics during stair ascent and descent. Further research examining muscle function especially during stair ascent is warranted

Introduction. Patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are now living longer and partaking in more active lifestyles. They expect a high level of post-operative function and long term durability of their implant. Using electromyography (EMG) analysis helps further explain biomechanical findings by giving insight as to what is occurring at the level of the muscles. Normal biomechanics are not restored post-TKA as patients have reduced knee flexion and weakened quadriceps muscles compared to their healthy peers. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare muscle activation in TKA patients who received a medial pivot (MP) or posterior stabilized (PS) implant to those of healthy controls (CTRL) during a stair ascent task. Methods. A total of 12 patients were assigned to either a MP or PS TKA operated by the same surgeon. Approximately 9 months following surgery, the 12 patients along with 6 CTRL patients completed an EMG analysis during a stair ascent task (Table 1). Wireless EMG electrodes were placed on 4 muscles: vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris long head (BF), and semimembranosus (SM) muscles. All participants completed maximal voluntary contractions (MVICs) during knee flexion and extension while seated with the knee flexed at 60°. Following the MVICs, participants completed 5 trials of a 3-step stair ascent task. TKA patients were instructed to make the first step onto the staircase with their operated limb. EMG data were processed in Matlab. Peak muscle activity (PeakLE EMG) and total muscle activity (iEMG) from each muscle was obtained during stance phase. Data were averaged between left and right limbs for the CTRL group and compared to the operated limb of TKA groups. Non-parametric Kruskal Wallace ANOVA tests were used to test for statistical significance between groups and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to identify differences with α=0.05. Results. Both TKA groups had significantly greater PeakLE EMG of the quadriceps muscles compared to the CTRL group (Figure 1). PeakLE EMG of the BF and VM muscles were significantly greater in the PS group compared to both CTRL and MP groups. The PS group had significantly greater iEMG of the BF, VL and VM muscles compared to the CTRL group (Figure 2) whereas the PS group had significantly greater iEMG of the SM and VM muscles compared to the MP group. Conclusion. The MP group had lower PeakLE EMG for both VM and BF muscles compared to the PS group, indicating that the MP group activates these muscles less to achieve the stair ascent task. BF muscle stabilizes the knee roll-back motion while the VM muscle extends the leg to clear the steps. iEMG for the VM and BF muscles were greater for the PS group indicating that they have to activate their muscles longer and to a greater extent in order to stabilize the joint. This increased stability in MP implants is achieved through the concave aspect on the medial tibial plateau for the femoral condyle to pivot in. This will reduce implant wear, prolonging implant longevity

Abstract

Total joint arthroplasty is an extremely high quality medical intervention with measured benefit to individual patients and society as a whole. However, nearly 20% of patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may report some level of dissatisfaction following surgery. Weight-bearing-in-flexion activities such as squatting and ascending/descending stairs are those activities with which patients most frequently report dissatisfaction.

It is assumed that optimal functioning following TKA requires proper femoral and tibial implant positioning in all planes (sagittal, coronal, and axial), proper femoral-tibial balance in the coronal and sagittal plane and durable fixation irrespective of implant design and the manner in which the surgery is executed. Posterior stabilised (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) TKA designs are the most predominant implants utilised yet their kinematics are infrequently close to normal. In addition, there is little clinical evidence that one design is superior to another. Alternative designs such as bi-cruciate and medially stabilised designs are much less frequently used and much less frequently studied. However, in both cases, isolated centers with relatively small volumes of patients studied have reported outcomes superior to PS and CR designs depending on the metric assessed.

With respect to kinematics, bi-cruciate and medially stabilised designs have displayed certain patterns of behavior that more closely mimic the native knee both in-vitro and in-vivo. Normal knee kinematics, as described by Freeman and Pinskerova, includes lateral sided femoral rollback with progressive knee flexion (alternatively thought of as internal tibial rotation with flexion) and sagittal plane stability achieved through the medial compartment. In theory, both optimal sagittal plane stability and internal tibial rotation with progressive flexion (consistent with normal dynamic changes in tibial tubercle – trochlear groove distance) following TKA should optimise weight-bearing-in-flexion kinematics and load transfer. Patient-related satisfaction with such activities might thus reasonably improve and may help explain the separate findings of Pritchett and Hossain regarding outcomes following medially stabilised TKA.

Medially stabilised TKA affords sagittal plane stability in mid-flexion and internal tibial rotation with flexion without the complexity and unique failure modes seen following bi-cruciate TKA. The work flow of performing medially stabilised TKA is similar to PS and CR surgical techniques and the surgeon need not climb a steep learning curve. In addition, similar to PS TKA, medial stabilised TKA is applicable to any primary state in which coronal plane balance can be achieved.

Further investigation in well-designed trials is necessary to fully develop an understanding of how different contemporary TKA designs might impact patient reported outcome. Larger registry populations of medially stabilised TKA over time are also necessary to best assess survivorship compared to other contemporary designs.

INTRODUCTION

Medial ball and socket knee designs have a long history but are not yet widely used. The Saiph medial ball and socket knee passed preclinical testing before an introductory cohort of 20 patients were studied in detail for 2 years. Subsequently a multicenter study was undertaken by the developing surgeons.

Introduction

Many factors can influence post-operative kinematics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These factors include intraoperative surgical conditions such as ligament release or quantity of bone resection as well as differences in implant design. Release of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is commonly performed to allow correction of varus knee. Precise biomechanical knowledge of the individual components of the MCL is critical for proper MCL release during TKA. The purpose of this study was to define the influences of the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) and the posterior oblique ligament (POL) on kinematics in TKA.

INTRODUCTION. In native knees anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and asymmetric shape of the tibial articular surface with a convex lateral plateau are responsible for differential medial and lateral femoral rollback. Contemporary ACL retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves knee function over ACL sacrificing (CR) TKA; however, these implants do not restore the asymmetric tibial articular geometry. This may explain why ACL retention addresses paradoxical anterior sliding seen in CR TKA, but does not fully restore medial pivot motion. To address this, an ACL retaining biomimetic implant, was designed by moving the femoral component through healthy in vivo kinematics obtained from bi-planar fluoroscopy and sequentially removing material from a tibial template. We hypothesized that the biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation would better restore activity dependent kinematics of normal knees, than ACL retention alone. METHODS. Kinematic performance of the biomimetic BCR design (asymmetric tibia with convex lateral surface), a contemporary BCR implant (symmetric shallow dished tibia) and a contemporary CR implant (symmetric dished tibia) was analyzed using KneeSIM software. Chair-sit, deep knee bend, and walking were analyzed. Components were mounted on an average bone model created from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 40 normal knees. Soft-tissue insertions were defined on the average knee model based on MRI data, and mechanical properties were obtained from literature. Femoral condyle center motions relative to the tibia were tracked to compare different implant designs. RESULTS. During simulated chair-sit, the biomimetic BCR implant showed knee motion similar to that reported for healthy knees in vivo including medial pivot rotation with greater rollback of the lateral femoral condyle (5 mm medial vs. 11 mm lateral). The CR implant showed posterior femoral subluxation in extension, paradoxical anterior sliding until 60° flexion followed by limited rollback until 105° with no medial pivot rotation. The conventional BCR implant reduced initial posterior shift of the femur in extension, however, medial pivot rotation and steady posterior rollback was not achieved. Similar trends were also found for deep knee bend activity. During walking the CR implant showed posterior subluxation in extension followed by anterior motion similar to the chair-sit activity. Both BCR implants showed less femoral excursion without posterior subluxation similar to published in vivo kinematics data for bi-uni patients. CONCLUSION. By simulating a variety of daily activities with different ranges of knee motion we were able to show that the ACL preserving biomimetic TKA implant could restore activity dependent normal knee kinematics unlike contemporary ACL retaining and ACL sacrificing implants. For chair-sit activity there was a clear medial pivot pattern for the biomimetic BCR design (unlike any other implant), while for lower flexion activities there was no medial pivot apparent in our simulations. These activity dependent knee motions are consistent with published in vivo kinematics and confirmed our hypothesis that biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation may be required to restore normal knee function. The biomimetic BCR design with its anatomical articular surface together with ACL preservation may provide patients with a more normal feeling knee following TKA surgery

Introduction:. Contemporary Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) retaining TKA implants (CR) are associated with well-known kinematic deficits, such as absence of medial pivot motion, paradoxical anterior femoral sliding, and posterior femoral subluxation at full extension. The hypothesis of this study was that a biomimetic implant, reverse engineered by using healthy knee kinematics to carve the tibial articular surface, could restore normal kinematic patterns of the knee. Methods:. Kinematics of the biomimetic CR and two contemporary CR implants (A, B) were evaluated during simulated deep knee bend and chair-sit in LifeModeler KneeSIM™ software. Anteroposterior motion of the medial and lateral femoral condyle centers was measured relative to a tibial origin. The implants were mounted on an average knee model created from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 40 healthy knees. The medial and lateral collateral ligaments, posterior cruciate ligament, quadriceps mechanism, and the overall capsular tension were modeled. The soft-tissue insertions were obtained from the average knee model, and the mechanical properties were obtained from literature. In vivo knee kinematics of healthy subjects from published literature was used for reference. Results:. During the simulated deep knee bend, the biomimetic CR showed knee motion similar to that reported for healthy knees in vivo, with an overall medial pivot and greater rollback of the lateral femoral condyle than the medial condyle (7.2 mm medial vs. 13.2 mm lateral, Fig 1. and Fig. 3). In contrast, contemporary CR-A showed no medial pivot rotation, and the femur underwent paradoxical anterior sliding from 0 deg to 90 deg flexion. Contemporary CR-B did not show paradoxical anterior femoral sliding. However, contemporary CR-B also did not show medial pivot and the posterior rollback of the medial femoral condyle was slightly greater than that of the lateral condyle (9.7 mm medial vs. 7 mm lateral). Similar trends were seen for all implants during the simulated chair sit (Fig 2. and Fig. 3). Conclusion:. The results confirmed the hypothesis that, during the simulated activities, the biomimetic CR implant could provide kinematics similar to that reported for healthy knees, unlike contemporary CR implants. The biomimetic implant showed medial pivot motion with greater rollback of the lateral femoral condyle than the medial condyle. In contrast, the contemporary implants showed several abnormalities including absence of medial pivot, paradoxical anterior femoral sliding and reduced posterior rollback

Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of total knee arthropalsty (TKA). Demand of TKA for the young patients who often have high physical demands is also increasing. However, the revision rate in such young patients is much higher due to polyethylene (PE) wear and instability (Julin J, Acta Orthop 2010). Therefore, next generation total knee prostheses are expected to decrease PE wear and to provide stability. Although in vitro study such as wear simulator test provides important information about PE wear, we have often encountered the discrepancy between the in vitro results and in vivo results. Thus we have performed in vivo PE wear particle analysis, and showed that in vivo PE wear was affected by the design of articulating surface and the materials of femoral component and PE insert (Minoda Y, JBJS Am 2009). Medial pivot design, ceramic femoral component, and highly cross-linked PE decreased in vivo PE wear particle generation. Patients who underwent bilateral staged TKAs were more likely to prefer medial pivot prosthesis or ACL-PCL retaining prosthesis than the other types of prostheses, because they feels “more stable overall” (Pritchett JW, J Arthroplasty 2011). In vivo fluoroscopic 3D analysis showed that medical pivot and bi-cruciate substituting designs restored physiological knee motion and provided higher reproducibility (Mueller J. Komistek RD, Trans ORS 2009, Iwakiri K, Trans ORS 2007). The excellent mid-term clinical results of those newly introduced total knee prosthesis, such as alumina medial pivot TKA (Iida T, ORS 2008), medial pivot TKA (Mannan K, JBJS Br 2009, Kakachalions T, Knee 2009), ACL-PCL retaining TKA (Clouter JM, JBJS Am 1999), and highly cross-linked PE (Hodrick JT, CORR 2008), have been reported. From the point of view of in vivo PE wear, in vivo stability, and the mid-term clinical results, we suspect that medial pivot prosthesis is one of the prostheses which meet the demand in future especially for young active patients

Most studies comparing medial pivot to the posterior stabilised (PS) systems sacrifice the PCL. It is unknown whether retaining the PCL in the Medial Congruent (MC) system may provide further benefit compared to the more commonly used PS system. A retrospective review of a single-surgeon's registry data comparing 44 PS and 25 MC with PCL retained (MC-PCLR) TKAs was performed. Both groups had similar baseline demographics in terms of age, gender, body mass index, and American Society for Anaesthesiology score. There was no significant difference in their preoperative range of motion (ROM) (104º±20º vs. 102º±20º,p=0.80), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (27±6 vs. 26±7,p=0.72), and Knee Society Scoring System (KS) Function Score (KS-FS) (52±24 vs. 56±24,p=0.62). The preoperative KS Knee Score (KS-KS) was significantly lower in the PS group (44±14 vs. 54 ± 18,p<0.05). At 3-months postoperation, the PS group had significantly better OKS (38±6 vs. 36±6,p=0.02) but similar ROM (111º±14º vs. 108º±12º,p=0.25), KS-FS (73±20 vs. 68±23, p=0.32) and KS-KS (87±10 vs. 86±9,p=0.26). At 12-months postoperation, both groups had similar ROM (115º±13º vs. 115º±11º,p=0.99), OKS (41±5 vs. 40±5,p=0.45), KS-FS (74±22vs.78±17,p=0.80), and KS-KS (89±10vs.89±11,p=0.75). There was statistically significant improvement in all parameters at 1-year postoperation (p<0.05). The PS group had significant improvement in all parameters from preoperation to 3-month postoperation (p<0.05), but not from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p≥0.05). The MC-PCLR group continued to have significant improvement from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p<0.05). The MC provides stability in the medial compartment while allowing a degree of freedom in the lateral compartment. Preserving the PCL when using MC may paradoxically cause an undesired additional restrain that slows the recovery process of the patients after TKA. In conclusion, compared to MC-PCLR, a PS TKA may expect significantly faster improvement at 3 months post operation, although they will achieve similar outcomes at 1-year post operation