Abstract
Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of total knee arthropalsty (TKA). Demand of TKA for the young patients who often have high physical demands is also increasing. However, the revision rate in such young patients is much higher due to polyethylene (PE) wear and instability (Julin J, Acta Orthop 2010). Therefore, next generation total knee prostheses are expected to decrease PE wear and to provide stability.
Although in vitro study such as wear simulator test provides important information about PE wear, we have often encountered the discrepancy between the in vitro results and in vivo results. Thus we have performed in vivo PE wear particle analysis, and showed that in vivo PE wear was affected by the design of articulating surface and the materials of femoral component and PE insert (Minoda Y, JBJS Am 2009). Medial pivot design, ceramic femoral component, and highly cross-linked PE decreased in vivo PE wear particle generation.
Patients who underwent bilateral staged TKAs were more likely to prefer medial pivot prosthesis or ACL-PCL retaining prosthesis than the other types of prostheses, because they feels “more stable overall” (Pritchett JW, J Arthroplasty 2011). In vivo fluoroscopic 3D analysis showed that medical pivot and bi-cruciate substituting designs restored physiological knee motion and provided higher reproducibility (Mueller J. Komistek RD, Trans ORS 2009, Iwakiri K, Trans ORS 2007).
The excellent mid-term clinical results of those newly introduced total knee prosthesis, such as alumina medial pivot TKA (Iida T, ORS 2008), medial pivot TKA (Mannan K, JBJS Br 2009, Kakachalions T, Knee 2009), ACL-PCL retaining TKA (Clouter JM, JBJS Am 1999), and highly cross-linked PE (Hodrick JT, CORR 2008), have been reported.
From the point of view of in vivo PE wear, in vivo stability, and the mid-term clinical results, we suspect that medial pivot prosthesis is one of the prostheses which meet the demand in future especially for young active patients.