Dislocation remains among the most common complications
of, and reasons for, revision of both primary and revision total
hip replacements (THR). Hence, there is great interest in maximising
stability to prevent this complication. Head size has been recognised
to have a strong influence on the risk of dislocation post-operatively.
As femoral head size increases, stability is augmented, secondary
to an increase in impingement-free range of movement. Larger head
sizes also greatly increase the ‘jump distance’ required for the
head to dislocate in an appropriately positioned cup. Level-one
studies support the use of
The number one reason to consider large heads in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is for increased stability.
Introduction & aims. Total hip replacement is an excellent treatment option for people with late stage degenerative hip disease. In addition to marked reduction in pain and improvement in sleep, most people regain range of motion, physical ability and quality of life. This study aimed at the functional outcomes of
Introduction:.
INTRODUCTION. The risk of dislocation in
Introduction: Dislocation rates with THA vary from 3% to 15%. One specialist centre reported a 6.4% early dislocation rate with a 28mm ceramic on polyethylene THA in young patients (mean age 56 years) in a single surgeon series. Although young patients have the advantage of better soft tissues, their greater mobility demands increase dislocation risk. Dislocation rates in large headed metal-on-metal resurfacings are extremely low. However, many patients are unsuitable for resurfacing and need a replacement. In such cases, it is attractive to transfer the large-headed metal-metal bearing advantage to replacement arthroplasty in order to reduce wear and dislocation rates. Does
The extension of THR to younger and more demanding patients implies the need of bearings enhancing the implants survival, raising the interest on hard-on-hard bearings (metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic). The standard bearing diameters in THR range from 7/8in (22,225 mm) to 32 mm. Larger diameter bearings were used by McKee-Farrar and Ring THR a solution that was abandoned after the success of Charnley Low Friction Arthroplasty that offered the advantage of much lower torques at the implant-bone interface, due also to the state-of-the-art of the cementation in the early 1960s. Increasing the diameter of THR bearings offers several advantages in terms of increased stability of the joint, as a larger displacement is necessary to produce the joint subluxation, and for a given neck diameter the risk of impingement is reduced while the prosthesis range of motion is increased. The reduced wear of metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings has led recently to revitalise the design concept of the early THR designs, and
Large femoral heads have been used with increasing
frequency over the last decade. The prime reason is likely the effect
of large heads on stability. The larger head neck ratio, combined
with the increased jump distance of larger heads result in a greater
arc of impingement free motion, and greater resistance to dislocation
in a provocative position. Multiple studies have demonstrated clear
clinical efficacy in diminishing dislocation rates with the use
of large femoral heads. With crosslinked polyethylene, wear has
been shown to be equivalent between larger and smaller heads. However,
the stability advantages of increasing diameter beyond 38 mm have
not been clearly demonstrated. More importantly, recent data implicates
large heads in the increasing prevalence of groin pain and psoas impingement.
There are clear benefits with
Purpose of the study: The tribologic characteristics of the metal-on-metal bearing enabled the introduction of large-diameter femoral heads on a conventional stem with the aim of improving implant stability. Our work was designed to determine whether the short-term outcomes corroborate this hypothesis and identify any specific complications. Material and methods: This was a comparative study of two series of non-cemented total hip arthroplasties (THA) with a high-carbon content metal-on-metal bearing: 250 25 mm arthroplasties implanted from August 2001 to April 2004; 250 large-diameter arthroplasties implanted from August 2003 to December 2006. The two series were comparable regarding age, gender, BMI, aetiology, Devane and Harris scores preoperatively (r2=0.98; p<
0.001). Patients were reviewed at mean 5 years 5 months (28mm) and 3 years 1 months (large diameter). Results: The analysis was possible for 224 implants in the 28 mm series and 242 in the
Dislocation is a major concern following total hip replacement (THR) for fractured neck of femur. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the use of
Dislocation is a major concern following THR for fractured neck of femur. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the use of
Introduction. Acetabular revision surgery is challenging due to severe bone defects. Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cages (BS cage: Zimmer-Biomet) is one of the options for acetabular revision, however higher dislocation rate was reported. A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system indicates us the planned direction for implantation of a cemented acetabular cup during surgery. A
Introduction.
Purpose of study There is renewed scientific interest in the use of metal-metal bearings for hip replacements. Such bearings have lower volumetric wear rates compared to metal or ceramic on polyethylene bearings. They permit the use of
Introduction. Current literature supports the use of total hip replacement (THR) for the treatment of displaced intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures (DIPFF). Case series of patients receiving this treatment show dislocation rates higher than that of patients who have THR to treat osteoarthritis.
High failure rates have been associated with
Introduction. Fatigue and wear at the head/stem modular junction of
Summary Statement. The frictional torque of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings tended to increase with increasing the bearings size (32, 48, 56mm). However, the frictional torque was significantly lower than that measured on metal-on-metal bearings under well positioned and well lubricated conditions. Introduction. Larger head size in total hip replacement theoretically provides increased range of motion and enhanced stability. However, there are potential clinical concerns regarding increased frictional torques with