The aim of the this study was to determine the effect of the knee flexion angle (KFA) during tibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation on patient reported outcomes, graft stability, extension loss and re-operation following anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. All 169 included patients (mean age 28.5 years, 65% male) were treated with anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft and randomized to tibial fixation of the ACL graft at either 0o (n=85) or 30o (n=84). The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) two years following surgery. Secondary outcomes were the Marx Activity Scale (MAS), the rate of re-operation, and physical exam findings at one year including KT-1000 and side to side differences in knee extension. The follow-up rate was 82% (n=139) for the primary outcome. Graft failure rate at two years was 1% (n=2, 1 per group). ACL tibial graft fixation at 0o or 30o did not have a significant effect on KOOS scores at two years following ACLR. Patients whose graft was fixed at a knee flexion angle of 0o had greater scores on the Marx Activity Scale (mean 9.6 [95%CI 8.5-10.6] versus 8.0 [95%CI 6.9-9.1, p=0.04) and a greater proportion of patients who achieved the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for the KOOS pain subscale (94% vs 81%, p=0.04). There was no significant difference in knee extension loss, KT-1000 measurements or re-operation between the two groups. In the setting of anatomic single-bundle ACLR using patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial portal femoral drilling, there was no difference in KOOS scores among patients fixed at 0o and 30o. Patient fixed in full extension did demonstrate higher activity scores at 2 years following surgery and a greater likelihood of achieving the MCID for KOOS pain

The bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft is associated with difficulty kneeling following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, however it is unclear whether it results in a more painful or symptomatic knee when compared to the hamstring tendon autograft. This study aimed to identify the rate of significant knee pain and difficulty kneeling following primary ACL reconstruction and clarify whether graft type influences the risk of these complications. Primary ACL reconstructions prospectively recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry between April 2014 and November 2019 were analyzed. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was analyzed to identify patients who reported significant knee pain, defined as a KOOS Pain subscale score of ≤72 points, and kneeling difficulty, defined as a patient who reported “severe” or “extreme” difficulty when they kneel. The rate of knee pain and kneeling difficulty was compared between graft types via univariate Chi-square test and multivariate binary logistic regression with adjustment for patient demographics. 4492 primary ACL reconstructions were analyzed. At 2-year follow-up, 9.3% of patients reported significant knee pain (420/4492) and 12.0% reported difficulty with kneeling (537/4492). Patients with a BTB autograft reported a higher rate of kneeling difficulty compared to patients with a hamstring tendon autograft (21.3% versus 9.4%, adjusted odds ratio = 3.12, p<0.001). There was no difference between graft types in the rate of significant knee pain (9.9% versus 9.2%, p = 0.49) or when comparing absolute values of the KOOS Pain (mean score for BTB = 88.7 versus 89.0, p = 0.37) and KOOS Symptoms subscales (mean score for BTB = 82.5 versus 82.1, p = 0.49). The BTB autograft is a risk factor for post-operative kneeling difficulty, but it does not result in a more painful or symptomatic knee when compared to the hamstring tendon autograft

The aim of this study was to determine the long term 20 year survival and outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO). 100 consecutive subjects underwent HTO under the care of a single surgeon between 2000 and 2002, consented to participation in a prospective study and completed preoperative WOMAC scores. Subjects were reviewed at 10 years, and again at a minimum of 20 years after surgery. PROMS included further surgery, WOMAC scores, Oxford Knee Score (OHS), KOOS, and EQ-5D, and satisfaction with surgery. 20 year survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meir analysis, and failure defined as proceeding to subsequent knee arthroplasty. The mean age at HTO was 50 years (range 26-66), and 72% were males. The 5, 10, and 20 year survival of the HTO was 88%, 76%, 43% respectively. On multiple regression analysis HTO failure was associated with poor preoperative WOMAC score of 45 or less (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.7-6.0, p=0.001), age at surgery of 55 or more (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, p=0.004), and obesity (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4, p=0.023). In patients who met all criteria of preoperative WOMAC score of 45 or less, age <55 years and body mass index of <30 HTO survival was 100%, 94%, and 59% at 5, 10 and 20 years respectively. Of those who had not proceeded to TKA the mean Oxford Score was 40, KOOS Pain score was 91 and KOOS function score was 97. 97% reported they were satisfied with the surgery and 88% would have the same surgery again under the same circumstances. At 20 years after HTO 43% had not proceeded to knee arthroplasty, and were continuing to demonstrate high subjective scores and satisfaction with surgery. HTO survival was higher in those under 55 years, with BMI <30 and baseline WOMAC score of >45 at 59% HTO survival over 20 years. HTO may be considered a viable procedure to delay premature knee arthroplasty in carefully selected subjects

One in five patients remain unsatisfied due to ongoing pain and impaired mobility following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is important if surgeons can pre-operatively identify which patients may be at risk for poor outcomes after TKA. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in patients who underwent TKA. This study included 28 patients (female = 12 / male = 16, age = 63.6 ± 6.9, BMI = 29.9 ± 7.4 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis who were scheduled to undergo TKA. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (GD), and a subvastus approach was performed for all patients. Patients visited the gait lab within one-month of surgery and 12 months following surgery. At the gait lab, patients completed the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), a timed up and go (TUG), and walking task. Variables of interest included the five KOOS sub-scores (symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sport & recreation, and quality of life), completion time for the TUG, walking speed, and peak knee biomechanics variables (flexion angle, abduction moment, power absorption). A Pearson's product-moment correlation was run to assess the relationship between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in the TKA patients. Preliminary analyses showed the relationship to be linear with all variables normally distributed, as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk's test (p > .05), and there were no outliers. There were no statistically significant correlations between any of the pre-operative KOOS sub-scores and any of the post-operative biomechanical outcomes. Pre-operative TUG time had a statistically significant, moderate positive correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = .597, p < .001] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = .498, p = .007], with pre-operative TUG time explaining 36% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 25% of the variability in peak knee power absorption. Pre-operative walking speed had a statistically significant, moderate negative correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = -.558, p = .002] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = -.548, p = .003], with pre-operative walking speed explaining 31% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 30% of the variability in peak knee power absorption. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the KOOS, do indicate the TKA is generally successful at relieving pain and show an overall improvement. However, their pre-operative values do not correlate with any biomechanical indicators of post-operative success, such as peak knee abduction moment and knee power. Shorter pre-operative TUG times and faster pre-operative walking speeds were correlated with improved post-operative biomechanical outcomes. These are simple tasks surgeons can implement into their clinics to evaluate their patients. Future research should expand these findings to a larger sample size and to determine if other factors, such as surgical approach or implant design, improves patient outcomes

Introduction. The first VRAS TKA was performed in New Zealand in November 2020 using a Patient Specific Balanced Technique whereby VRAS enables very accurate collection of the bony anatomy and soft tissue envelope of the knee to plan and execute the optimal positioning for a balanced TKA. Method. The first 45 VRAS patients with idiopathic osteoarthritis of the knee was compared with 45 sequential patients who underwent the same TKA surgical technique using Brainlab 3 which the author has used exclusively in over 1500 patients. One and two year outcome data will be presented. Results. One year outcome dataVely Brainlab Significance Oxford 43.4 40.5 P=0.01 WOMAC 8.4 14.1P=0.02 Forgotten Joint Score 72.2 58.3 P=0.01 KOOS ADL91.3 85.8 P=0.04 Normal 83.3 74.2P =0.048 Activity Pain 8.6 18.4 P=0.009 ROM 127 124 P=0.01 Patient Satisfaction 98% 95% P=0.62 Operation again 100% 91% P=0.055 The two year data will be available for the ASM Conclusion: The one year outcome data shows a significantly better Oxford, WOMAC, Forgotten Joint score, KOOS ADL, Normal score and ROM scores and the activity pain is less compared to the authors extensive experience with Brainlab 3

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of passively collecting objective data from a commercially available smartphone-based care management platform (sbCMP) and robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA). Methods. Secondary data analysis was performed using de-identified data from a commercial database that collected metrics from a sbCMP combined with intraoperative data collection from raTKA. Patients were included in this analysis if they underwent unilateral raTKA between July 2020 and February 2021, and were prescribed the sbCMP (n=131). The population consisted of 76 females and 55 males, with a mean age of 64 years (range, 43 – 81). Pre-operative through six-week post-operative data included step counts from the sbCMP, as well as administration of the KOOS JR. Intraoperative data included surgical times, the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and medial and lateral laxity assessments from the robotic assessment. Data are presented using descriptive statistics. Comparisons were performed using a paired samples t-test, or Wilcoxon Signed-rank test, with significance assessed at p<0.05. A minimal detectable change (MDC) in the KOOS JR score was considered ½ standard deviation of the preoperative values. Results. KOOS JR scores improved from a preoperative mean of 51.5 ± 11.5 to a 6-week postoperative mean of 64 ± 10.04 (p<0.001). An MDC of 5.75 units was achieved. Step counts decreased initially and returned to preoperative values by week 6 (Figure 1, p=0.196). When evaluating time requirements from landmarking to completed surgical cuts, the median surgical time was 40.2 minutes (IQR, 29.4 – 52.0). The median absolute deformity for HKA preoperatively was 6.9 degrees (IQR, 4.1 – 10.1) and the final intraoperative median HKA was 0.9 degrees (IQR, 0.1 – 3, p<0.001). There was a difference in medial and lateral joint laxity in flexion and extension at the initial intraoperative evaluation (p<0.01). At the final evaluation there was no difference in medial and lateral joint laxity in extension (p=0.239); however, a slight difference in flexion was noted (p=0.001). Given the median values of 1.2mm (0.8 – 2.4) medially vs. 1.4mm (0.9 – 3) laterally, this difference is not likely clinically relevant. Patients who had <1 mm of medial laxity in flexion had significantly fewer step counts at week 6 post-operatively (p=0.035). There was no difference in KOOS JR scores associated with tightness (p>0.05). Discussion. The use of passively collected objective measures in a commercial database across the episode of care was feasible and demonstrated associations between intraoperative and post-operative metrics. To our knowledge, this is the first integrated data collection and reporting platform to report on these measures in a commercial population. Future research is needed in order to understand the benefit of displaying these metrics, as well as the role of variations in alignment and gap balance on function. Conclusions. Contemporary data platforms may be used to improve the understanding of individual recovery paths through real-time passive data collection throughout the episode of care. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Many groups consider passive flexion to be a good indicator of postoperative success, to the point where this outcome directly influences certain outcome scores such as Knee Society Scores (KSS). However, it is alternatively believed that normal-like kinematics result in better TKA outcomes, and previous fluoroscopy studies have demonstrated that there are many parameters that affect weight-bearing range-of-motion. The objective of this study to investigate the correlations between patient-reported outcomes, passive flexion, and weight-bearing knee kinematics. Methods. The femorotibial kinematics, passive and weight-bearing range-of-motion, and KOOS and KSS for 291 TKA subjects were collected in a retrospective study. The average age, BMI, and post-op time was 69.2±7.2 years, 29.3±4.6, and 22.4±16.3 months, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis was used to find the statistical correlations between the various parameters, and two-tailed t-tests were carried out to find statistical differences. Results. Superior weight-bearing flexion was statistically correlated with both higher KOOS (r=0.2122, p=0.0094) and KSS (r=0.2986, p<.0001), shown in Table 1. Interestingly, there was no correlation with respect to passive flexion and KOOS (r=0.1363, p=0.0975). Correlations between KSS and passive flexion were not analyzed due to the inherent covariance between these parameters. Furthermore, subjects with paradoxical anterior sliding of either condyle had significantly lower KSS scores than those without anterior sliding (81.1±11.9 versus 84.4±12.4 for lateral, p=0.03, and 82.2±12.1 versus 85.1±12.5 for medial, p=0.02). Conclusion. The results of this study revealed that weight-bearing flexion and not passive flexion is a better predictor of TKA outcomes. Subjects having greater weight-bearing flexion demonstrated higher KOOS and KSS scores. Also, subjects that experienced a paradoxical anterior slide had a statistically lower KSS than those subjects that experienced posterior femoral rollback. Therefore, it may be more important to evaluate weight-bearing flexion during clinical exams. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Achieving a balanced joint with neutral alignment is not always possible in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intra-operative compromises such as accepting some joint imbalance, non-neutral alignment or soft-tissue release may result in worse patient outcomes, however, it is unclear which compromise will most impact outcome. In this study we investigate the impact of post-operative soft tissue balance and component alignment on postoperative pain. Methods. 135 patients were prospectively enrolled in robot assisted TKA with a digital joint tensioning tool (OMNIBotics with BalanceBot, Corin USA) (57% female; 67.0 ± 8.1 y/o; BMI: 31.9 ± 4.8 kg/m. 2. ). All surgeries were performed with a PCL sacrificing tibia or femur first techniques technique, using CR femoral components and a deep dish tibial insert (APEX, Corin USA). Gap measurements were acquired under load (average 80 N) throughout the range of motion during trialing with the tensioning tool inserted in place of the tibial trial. Component alignment parameters and post-operative joint gaps throughout flexion were recorded. Patients completed 1-year KOOS pain questionnaires. Spearman correlations and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to investigate continuous and categorical data respectively. All analysis performed in R 3.5.3. Results. Significant correlations were found between KOOS Pain and joint balance (p < 0.05). Joint gap thresholds of an equally balanced or tighter medial compartment in extension, ±1 mm medial laxity compared to the final insert thickness in midflexion, and medio-lateral imbalance < 1.5 mm in flexion generated subgroups with significantly improved pain outcomes (median Δ = 8.3, 5.6 and 2.8 points, respectively). When all joint balance thresholds were satisfied, further improved outcomes resulted (median Δ = 11.2, p = 0.0018) (Figure 1 Left). No significant correlations were identified between femoral coronal (0.8 ± 2.1° valgus) and axial (2.1 ± 2.7° external) or tibiofemoral extension (1.1 ± 2.4° varus) and flexion (2.4 ± 2.8° varus) coronal alignments and KOOS Pain. Neutral and non-neutral femoral (±3° coronal and 0° – 5° external) and tibiofemoral (±3° coronal and −2° − 5° external) subgroups also reported no difference in KOOS pain outcome (Figure 1 Right). Discussion and Conclusion. The gap profiles identified here help build the understanding of joint balance and its relationship with outcome when using a PCL sacrificing deep dish tibial insert. Using a digitally-controlled distraction device, joint gap windows of clinical relevance were identified with statistically improved patient outcomes. By combining joint gap targets, subpopulations were identified with clinically significant improved pain outcomes. Furthermore, small changes in component alignment did not impact 1 yr pain outcomes, indicating soft tissue balance has a greater impact on outcome that alignment in the enrolled population. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Abstract. Background. With the increasingly accepted method of suprapatellar tibial nailing for tibial shaft fractures, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of infrapatellar (IP) vs suprapatellar (SP) tibial nails. Methods. A retrospective cohort analysis of 58 patients. 34 SP tibial nails over 3 years versus 24 IP tibial nails over a similar time frame. We compared; radiation exposure, patient positioning time (PPT), non-union rate and follow-up time. Knee pain in the SP group was evaluated, utilising the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Results. 58 patients with a mean age of 43 years were included. Mean intraoperative radiation dose for SP nails was 61.78cGy (range 11.60 to 156.01cGy) vs 121.09cGy (range 58.01 to 18.03cGy) for IP nails (p < 0.05). Mean PPT for SP nails was 10 minutes vs 18 minutes for IP nails (p < 0.05). All fractures united in the SP group vs one non-union in the IP group. Mean follow-up was 5.5 months vs 11 months in the SP and IP group respectively. Mean KOOS was 7 (range 0 to 22) at 6 months for the SP group. Conclusion. The semi extended position (SP group) leads to reduced radiation exposure because of ease of imaging. All Patients in the SP group showed improved outcomes, with shorter follow-up and fracture union. The KOOS revealed SP nail patients had minimal pain and good knee function. This study establishes a management and PROMs baseline for ongoing evaluation of SP nails

Background. Achieving good ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to prevent early failure and revision surgery. Poor balance and instability are well-defined, however, an ideal ligament balance target across all patients is not well-understood. In this study we investigate the achieved ligament balance using an imageless, intra-operative dynamic balancing tool and its relation to patient reported outcomes. Methods. A prospective, multi-surgeon, multi-center study investigated the use of a dynamic ligament-balancing tool in combination with a robotic-assisted navigation platform using the APEX knee (OMNI-Corin, Raynham MA). After all resections, the femoral trial and a computer-controlled tensioning device in place of the tibial tray was inserted into the knee joint. The difference in medial and lateral (ML) gaps when balancing the knee under constant load at extension (10°), mid-flexion (30°) and flexion (90°) was captured. Patients completed the KOOS questionnaire at 3 months ± 2 weeks post-surgery and considered the past 7 days as a timeframe for responses. Pearson's correlation was used to determine linear correlations between factors and ANOVA tests were used to determine differences in categorical data. Results. Thirty patients have currently completed 3 months KOOS questionnaires for analysis (age: 68±9.3yrs, Male: 43%). Strong correlations were found between the difference in ML gap for KOOS symptoms and pain in extension (r=−0.54, p=0.002, r=−0.50, p=0.005, respectively) and mid flexion (r=−0.52, p=0.003, r=−0.48, p=0.007, respectively), but not in full flexion (r=−0.13, p=0.5, r=−0.23, p=0.22, respectively). A threshold of 1.5 mm difference in joint gap under constant load was used to distinguish between balanced and more lax knees medially or laterally. Worse KOOS symptoms were found in patients with tighter lateral laxity in extension and mid flexion (△=15 points, p=0.03, △=21 points, p=0.0002, respectively) compared to the rest of the cohort, see Figure 1. Similarly, worse KOOS pain was found for tight lateral laxity in mid-flexion (△=14 points, p=0.02). No significant differences were found in full flexion or for patients with a tight medial side at any flexion angle. Stronger differences in extension and mid flexion may reflect the type of activities and range of motion most commonly encountered as a TKA patient. A younger population engaging higher demand activities may be more sensitive to coronal soft tissue balance in full flexion. Conclusion. Improved patient outcomes were found to correlate with a neutrally-balanced or tighter medial soft tissue profile compared to tighter lateral structures. These results reflect the behaviour of the native knee. The cohort investigated here is small and data collection is ongoing. Further data will be needed to determine if these results can be generalized and to investigate the potential of patient specificity in ideal ligament balancing. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. There is debate regarding whether the use of computer-assisted technology, such as navigation and robotics, has any benefit on clinical or patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to report on the association between intraoperative use of technology and outcomes in patients who underwent primary TKA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 7,096 patients who underwent primary TKA from 2016–2020. Patients were stratified depending on the technology utilized intraoperatively: navigation, robotics, or no technology. Patient demographics, clinical data, Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) were collected at various time points up to 1-year follow-up. Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and ANOVA tests. Clinical data and mean FJS and KOOS, JR scores were compared using univariate ANCOVA, controlling for demographic differences. Results. During the study period, 287 (4%) navigation, 367 (5%) robotics, and 6,442 (91%) manual cases were performed. Surgical time significantly differed between the three groups (113.33 vs. 117.44 vs. 102.11 respectively; p<0.001). Discharge disposition significantly differed between the three groups (p<0.001), with a greater percentage of patients who underwent manual TKA discharged to a skilled nursing facility (12% vs. 8% vs. 15%; p<0.001) than those who had intraoperative technology utilized. FJS scores did not statistically differ at 3-months (p=0.067) and 1-year (p=0.221) postoperatively. There was a significant statistical difference in three-month KOOS, JR scores (59.48 vs. 60.10 vs. 63.64; p=0.001); however, one-year scores did not statistically differ between the three groups (p=0.320). Mean improvement in KOOS, JR scores preoperatively to one-year postoperatively was significantly largest for the navigation group and least for robotics (27.12 vs. 23.78 vs. 25.42; p<0.001). Conclusion. This study demonstrates shorter mean operative time in cases with no utilization of technology and clinically similar patient reported outcome scores associated with TKAs performed between all modalities. While the use of intraoperative technology may aid surgeons, it has not currently translated to better short-term patient outcomes

Young, active patients with end-stage medial osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency present a treatment challenge for surgeons. Current surgical treatment options include high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with or without ACL reconstruction, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with ACL reconstruction, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A recent systematic review reported a much higher rate of complications in HTO combined with ACL reconstruction than with UKA-ACL (21.1% vs 2.8%), while survivorship between the two procedures was similar. UKA offers several advantages over TKA, namely faster recovery, lower blood loss, lower rate of postoperative complications, better range of motion, and better knee kinematics. However, UKA has classically been contraindicated in the presence of ACL deficiency due to reported concerns over increased incidence aseptic loosening tibia. However, as a majority of patients presenting with this pathology are young and active, concerns about implant longevity with TKRA and loss of bone stock have arisen. As a result, several authors have described combining ACL reconstruction with medial UKA to decrease the tibiofemoral translation-related stress on the tibial component, thereby decreasing aseptic loosening-related failures. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and survivorship of combined medial UKA and ACL reconstruction (UKA-ACL) with those of a matched TKA cohort. We hypothesized that UKA-ACL patients would have better functional outcomes than TKA patients while maintaining similar survivorship. Material and Methods. We conducted a case-control study establishing UKA-ACL as the study group and TKA as the control group by a single senior surgeon between October 2005 and January 2015. We excluded patients who were over the age of 55 at the time of surgery and those who had less than two-year follow-up. A total of 21 patients (23 knees) were ultimately included in each group. Propensity matching was for age-, sex-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched control group of TKA cases. Surgical technique. UKA-ACL. This patient's had an arthroscopy to allow for tunnel preparation in the standard fashion and then the graft was passed and fixed on the femoral side. An MIS medial incision was then made to allow for insertion of the Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental prosthesis (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN). Primary choice of ACL graft was autogenous ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, which was available I and 6 of the cases were revision from previous Gore-Tex synthetic ligament reconstruction. Results. Preoperatively, baseline questionnaires demonstrated that the TKA group had scored significantly lower on the symptom subscore of the KOOS. There was no difference between the groups in the rest of the KOOS subscores, (the UCLA, and the Tegner. All scores (UCLA, and Tegner – TBC post stats) improved significantly after surgery in both groups. Improvement in each subscore of the KOOS surpassed the minimal clinically important difference in both the UKA-ACL and TKA groups. At latest follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups on the KOOS, UCLA or Tegner, showing that our UKA-ACL patients fared as our TKA patients. This confirms that UKA-ACL is an important tool in dealing with young patients with end-stage medial OA and ACL deficiency and offers an option that leads to less bone loss and potentially easier future revision. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Abstract. Background. The gold standard treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury is reconstruction (ACL-R). Graft failure is the concern and ensuring a durable initial graft with rapid integration is crucial. Graft augmentation with implantable devices (internal brace reinforcement) is a technique purported to reduce the risk of rupture and hasten recovery. We aim to compare the short-term outcome of ACL-R using augmented hamstring tendon autografts (internally braced with neoligament) and non-augmented hamstring autografts. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing augmented and non-augmented ACL-R. All procedures were performed in a single centre using the same technique. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] was used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results. There were 70 patients in the augmented and 111 patients in the control group. Mean graft diameter in the augmented group was 8.82mm versus 8.44mm in the non-augmented. Six strand graft was achievable in 73.5% of the augmented group compared to 33% in the non-augmented group. Two graft failures were reported in the non-augmented group and none in the augmented group. Patient satisfaction rates were higher in the augmented group. There was a statistically insignificant improvement in the postoperative KOOS in the augmented group compared to the non-augmented group (p 0.6). Irrespective of augmentation status, no correlation was found between the functional score and age, or femoral tunnel width. Conclusion. Augmented ACL-R may achieve superior graft diameters, lower failure rates and better patient reported outcomes when compared to nonaugmented ACL-R. Prospective trials are needed to examine this further

Little guidance exists in the current literature regarding which patient recorded outcome measures (PROMs) are most clinically appropriate following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery, and what results surgeons should expect or accept. Many PROMs have been validated, but their “ideal” results have not been published, limiting a surgeon's ability to compare their patients’ outcomes with those of their colleagues. We undertook a systematic review of PROMs for ACL to look at common usage and outcomes. After appropriate paper selection, we then undertook a pragmatic meta-analysis (i.e., including all papers that fulfilled the selection criteria, regardless of CONSORT status) and calculated weighted mean outcome scores and standard deviations for the most commonly used PROMs. A comprehensive literature search of all English articles of PubMed and other sources including search terms (‘Patient related outcome measure’ or ‘PROM’) AND ‘anterior cruciate ligament’ (limited to abstract/title) yielded 722 articles. Title review narrowed this to 268, and abstracts review to 151, of which 88 were included in our meta-analysis. Weighted mean and standard deviations were calculated for IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, Teneger and “VAS Pain” PROMs as the most commonly reported. We identified significant, novel findings relating to selected PROMs and (i) demographics including age, gender and body mass index, (ii) surgical factors including bundle count, strand count, and graft type, and (iii) post operative complications. We clarified the most commonly used PROMs for ACL, and their weighted means and standard deviations. This will allow surgeons to compare results with colleagues, ensuring they meet international levels of quality in PROMs. We have also updated which patient and operative factors have an impact on PROMs scoring to allow for population variance

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgery performed for knee osteoarthritis. Despite this success up to 20% of patients are less than fully satisfied. Rotating platform (RP) bearings have demonstrated significant reduction in rates of wear in laboratory studies but thus far have failed to demonstrate a clinical difference compared to fixed bearing (FB) arthroplasty in patients. This may be due to studies limited by small sample size and single centre design. Additionally, no studies have utilised modern patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as PKIP to investigate differences between these bearings. A non-randomised, prospective, multi-centre study was conducted across centres in Australia, United Kingdom and the United States from November 2012 to May 2015. Knee prosthesis included were the RP and FB models of the PFC Sigma Knee (Depuy, Synthes) and the ATTUNE Knee (Depuy, Synthes). Data was collected on pre-arthroplasty interventions, demographics and PROMs. PROMs included were the KOOS, OKS, EQ53DL and PKIP. Participants were followed-up for 2 years. A total of 1,718 patients were recruited across 27 centres. 959 participants underwent a FB TKA, 759 participants underwent a RP TKA. No significant difference was found between RP and FB in change from baseline at 2 years across any parameter in all PROMs investigated at 2 years. Body Mass Index pre-operatively was the biggest indicator of change from baseline at 2 years. Our data demonstrates similar improvements in the short-term in both RP and TKA across all PROMs. Patients reported similar scores in satisfaction, confidence, mobility and stability in the PKIP PROM for both RP and FB groups. We have not found any evidence to suggest that RP TKA is disadvantageous at 2 years, and this is reassuring for any surgeon looking to utilise this bearing type in practice. Our data does not demonstrate a clinical advantage in RP TKA over FB TKA at 2 years in any PROM

Most previous studies investigating autograft options (quadriceps, hamstring, bone-patella-tendon-bone) in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are confounded by concomitant knee injuries. This study aims to investigate the differences in patient reported outcome measures and revision rates for quadriceps tendon in comparison with hamstring tendon and bone-patella-tendon-bone autografts. We use a cohort of patients who have had primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injuries. All patients from the New Zealand ACL Registry who underwent a primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with minimum 2 year follow-up were considered for the study. Patients who had associated ipsilateral knee injuries, previous knee surgery, or open procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and MARX scores at 2 years post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were all-cause revision and time to revision with a total follow-up period of 8 years (time since inception of the registry). 2581 patients were included in the study; 1917 hamstring tendon, 557 bone-patella-tendon-bone, and 107 quadriceps tendon. At 2 years, no significant difference in MARX scores were found between the three groups (2y mean score; 7.36 hamstring, 7.85 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 8.05 quadriceps, P = 0.195). Further, no significant difference in KOOS scores were found between the three groups; with the exception of hamstring performing better than bone-patella-tendon-bone in the KOOS sports and recreation sub-score (2y mean score; 79.2 hamstring, 73.9 bone-patella-tendon-bone, P < 0.001). Similar revision rates were reported between all autograft groups (mean revision rate per 100 component years; 1.05 hamstring, 0.80 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 1.68 quadriceps, P = 0.083). Autograft revision rates were independent of age and gender variables. Quadriceps tendon is a comparable autograft choice to the status quo for primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injury. Further research is required to quantify the long-term outcomes for quadriceps tendon use

Cryocompression therapy is a non-invasive and non-pharmacological modality used in managing acute post-operative inflammation and pain. A prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of a post-operative cryocompression protocol using the Game Ready™ (GR) device versus usual care on recovery following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A single centre RCT was conducted with 70 TKAs (68 patients) randomised to a 2-week intervention period consisting of treatment with GR cryocompression (n=33, 33.3% males) or a usual care protocol of ice with static compression using tubigrip (n=35, 54.3% males). Knee range of movement (ROM) (flexion and extension), a visual analogue pain score (VAS) and limb circumference were documented at day 1, 2 and 14, as well as 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery. ROM was also recorded at day 90, while medication use and length of hospital stay were documented. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the KOOS and patient satisfaction questionnaire were employed. The GR group demonstrated 2.3° more (p=0.05) knee extension ROM overall, as well as 2. 8° more at day 1 (p=0.048), 3.8° at day 14 (p=0.007) and 5.4° at 3 months (p=0.017). There were no group differences (p>0.05) observed in pain (VAS), flexion ROM, limb circumference, opioid use or other PROMs. Across the full cohort, higher pain levels resulted in increased opioid intake (p=0.002), older patients used significantly less opioids (p<0.001) and males reported significantly less pain (VAS) than females (p=0.048). Using GR following TKA is a safe, non-invasive tool that can be used to aid in the post-operative recovery period. Patients using the GR cryocompression device gained significantly more extension ROM compared to the conventional ice with compression group, despite no other group differences

Introduction. Dissatisfaction rates after TKA are reported to be between 15 – 25%, with unmet outcome expectations being a key contributor. Shared decision making tools (SDMT) are designed to align a patient's and surgeon's expectations. This study demonstrates clinical validation of a patient specific shared decision making tool. Methods. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected in 150 patients in a pre-consultation environment of one surgeon. The data was processed into a probabilistic predictive model utilising prior data to generate a preoperative baseline and an expected outcome after TKA. The surgeon was blinded to the prediction algorithm for the first 75 patients and exposed for the following 75 patients. PROMs collected were the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and questions on lower back pain, hip pain and falls. The patients booked and not booked before and after exposure to the prediction were collected. The clinical validation involved 27 patients who had their outcome predicted and had their PROMs captured at 12 months after TKA. The predicted change in severity of pain and the patients actual change from pre-op to 12 month post operative KOOS pain was analysed using a Spearman's Rho correlation. Further analysis was performed by dividing the group into those predicted by the model to have improved by more than 10 percentile points and those who were predicted to improve by less than 10 percentile points. Results. Prior to the clinical implementation of the application, the population of patients booked for TKR surgery had a preoperative KOOS pain score of 47.9 ± 17.1, while those not booked for TKR surgery had a mean KOOS pain score of 54.4 ± 21.0 points, with higher scores indicating a lower pain state. A difference of 6.5 points exists between the means. Following introduction of the application, the scores for the population of patients booked for TKR surgery were 40.0 ± 12.3, while those not booked were 55.2 ± 18.8, a significant difference of 15.2 (p<0.001). The clinical validation showed a strong correlation between the predicted and actual pain state change (Spearman's Rho = 0.63, p<0.0001). Patients who were predicted to have a change of less than 10 points pre- operatively had a lower KOOS total score at 12 months (72.16 vs 86.97, p = 0.02). Conclusions. We found a significant difference in the KOOS pain score of patients for whom a decision to operate was made following introduction of the application. A predictive algorithm based on PROMs may assist a surgeon to optimise their patient selection for TKR. The clinical validation showed a strong correlation between predicted and actual change in pain state before and after TKA, supporting the validity of the SDMT's prediction. Literature has shown that the change between pre TKA pain state and post TKA pain state influences patient satisfaction; those with a smaller change in reported pain being less satisfied. This concept has led to the development of a patient specific shared decision making tool that can be used by surgeons and patients in the pre TKA consultation

Abstract. Background. The gold standard treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury is reconstruction (ACL-R). Graft augmentation with suture tape (internal brace) are techniques purported to reduce the risk of rupture and hasten recovery. Our aim was to assess the short-term outcome of ACL-R using fibre tape augmented and non-augmented hamstring tendon grafts. Methods. This was a retrospective comparative study looking at augmented and non-augmented ACL-R. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon in a single centre using the same technique. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] was used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results. There were 72 patients in the augmented and 132 patients in the control group. Confounding factors were comparable in both groups. The mean graft diameter in the augmented group was 8.81mm versus 8.01mm in the non-augmented. Six strand graft was achievable in 71% of the augmented group compared to 62.5% in the non-augmented group. Two graft failures reported in the non-augmented group and none in the augmented group. The average 14-month postoperative KOOS in the augmented group was 90.5 compared to an average 30-month score of 82.5 in the non-augmented group, which is statistically significant. Conclusion. Augmented ACL-R demonstrate statistically significant better patient-reported outcomes compared to the nonaugmented group. Graft failure rates may also be lower in augmented ACL-R

Introduction. Robotic systems have been used in TKA to add precision, although few studies have evaluated clinical outcomes. We report on early clinical results evaluating patient reported outcomes (PROs) on a series of robotic-assisted TKA (RAS-TKA) patients, and compare scores to those reported in the literature. Methods. We prospectively consented and enrolled 106 patients undergoing RAS-TKA by a single surgeon performing a measured-resection femur-first technique using a miniature bone-mounted robotic system. Patients completed a KOOS, New Knee Society Score (2011 KSS) and a Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months (M) post- operatively. At the time of publication 104, 101, and 78 patients had completed 3M, 6M, and 12M PROs, respectively. Changes in the five KOOS subscales (Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and recreation function (Sport/Rec) and Knee-related Quality of Life (QOL)) were compared to available literature data from FORCE – TJR, a large, prospective, national cohort of TJR patients enrolled from diverse high-volume centers and community orthopaedic practices in the U.S, as well as to individual studies reporting on conventional (CON-TKA) and computer-assisted (CAS- TKA) at 3M, and on conventional TKA at 6M. The 2011 KSS is a validated method for quantifying patient's expectations and satisfaction with their TKA procedure. Improvements in the 2011 KSS were compared with literature data at 6M post-operatively. Results. RAS-TKA PRO's significantly improved at 3, 6, and 12M from pre-operative baseline values. When compared to the FORCE registry cohort data, the improvement in KOOS subscales were generally higher for RAS for pain at 6M, and for pain, ADL, and QOL at 1Y when compared with FORCE 2Y data. Higher improvements were also seen at 3M, except for Sports/Rec, and at 6M for symptoms and QOL when compared with smaller cohort studies. Improvements in 2011 KSS patient satisfaction and functional scores at 6M were 11 and 10 points greater than those reported for conventional TKA. A mean of 31 pts for the Patient Satisfaction score indicates that on average patients were ‘Satisfied’ with their knee function and pain level. Mean rates of dissatisfaction with knee pain level and function were 9.2%, 3.8% and 3.1% at 3, 6, and 12M postoperatively, respectively. A mean of 10pts for the Expectation score post-operatively indicates that on average patients felt their expectations for pain relief, ADL, and leisure/sports/rec activities were between “Just Right” or “Too Low”. Discussion. Early results of RAS-TKA demonstrated significant improvements in pain, function, and QOL from baseline pre-operative values. PROs for robotic TKA also compared favorably with results reported in the literature; however, additional randomized control studies are required to provide more meaningful comparisons with conventional techniques and with other advanced technologies