Background and study purpose. Low back pain with no identified underlying cause is categorised as primary musculoskeletal pain by the International Association for the Study of Pain. In April 2021, the National Institute for Care and Excellence (NICE) published updated guidance for the management of primary chronic pain conditions in England. As part of the De-STRESS pain study, we explored the perspectives of GPs on the updated guideline and impact upon clinical practice. Methods and results. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 GPs in England. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and constant comparison techniques. GPs agreed with the recommendations restricting pharmacological options for pain management and reflected that they now had an expert reference to back-up their decision-making and could use the guidance in potentially difficult conversations with patients. Frustration was expressed by GPs about the lack of alternative options to medication, as the non-pharmacological recommendations were difficult to implement, had lengthy waiting lists, or were unavailable in their locality. Conclusion. Although GPs discussed benefits of the updated NICE guideline in potentially reducing prescriptions of ineffective and potentially harmful medications, frustration about the lack of alternative strategies added to the difficulties encountered in managing people with persistent back pain in primary care. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This study was funded by Versus Arthritis – grant number 22454; Carolyn A Chew-Graham is part-funded by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands

Introduction. Analgesic drugs are often prescribed to patients with low back pain (LBP). Recommendations for non-invasive pharmacological management of LBP from recent clinical practice guidelines were compared with each other and with the best available evidence on drug efficacy. Methods. Guideline recommendations concerning opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, antidepressants, anticonvulsants and muscle relaxants from national primary care guidelines published within the last 3 years were included in this review. For each pharmacotherapy, the most recent systematic review was included as the best available evidence on drug efficacy and common adverse effects were summarized. Results. Eight recent national clinical practice guidelines were included in this review (from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, UK and US). Guidelines are universally moving away from pharmacotherapy due to the limited efficacy and the risk of adverse effects. NSAIDs have replaced paracetamol as the first choice analgesics for LBP in many guidelines. Opioids are considered to be a last resort in all guidelines, but prescriptions of these medications have been increasing over recent years. Only limited evidence exists for the efficacy of antidepressants and anticonvulsants in chronic LBP. Muscle relaxants are one of the analgesics of first choice in the US, but aren't widely available and thus not widely recommended in most other countries. Conclusions. Upcoming guideline updates should shift their focus from pain to function and from pharmacotherapy to non-pharmacologic treatment options. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This review has been supported by a program grant of the Dutch Arthritis Foundation

Background and aims. The EU-funded Back-UP project aims to develop a cloud computer platform to guide the treatment of low back and neck pain (LBNP) in first contact care and early rehabilitation. In order to identify evidence-based treatment options that can be recommended and are accessible to people with LBNP across Europe, we conducted a systematic review of recently published guidelines. Methods. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, Epistemonikos, PEDro, TRIP, NICE, SIGN, WHO, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) and DynaMed Plus were searched. We searched for guidelines published by European health professional or guideline development organisations since 2013, focusing on the primary care management of adult patients presenting with back or neck pain (including whiplash associated symptoms, radicular pain, and pregnancy-related LBP). The AGREE-II tool was used to assess the quality of guideline development and reporting. Results. Searches generated 3098 unique citations that were screened for eligibility. A total of 189 full-texts were retrieved, and 18 guidelines were included in the review (from the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Denmark, Poland, Belgium, and the Netherlands). Data extraction showed considerable variation in guideline development processes, especially regarding the methods used for identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence, and for formulating, agreeing, and grading recommendations. Conclusions. Recommendations for the management of LBNP cover a wide range of treatment options, with self-management advice, analgesics, and exercise proposed as core treatments by most guidelines. A narrative synthesis, taking into account consistency, strength, and quality of guideline recommendations, will be presented. No conflicts of interest. Funding: This abstract presents independent research within the Back-UP project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 777090. This document reflects only the views of the authors, and the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of its contents. The information in this document is provided “as is”, without warranty of any kind, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person using this information

Background and purpose. Adherence to clinical guidelines produces greater improvement in disability in patients with low back pain (LBP), but a wide variation in physiotherapists' adherence has been documented repeatedly. The aim of the study was to investigate the adherence to National Clinical Guidelines for LBP among Danish physiotherapists with regard to three key guideline domains: 1) activity, 2) work, and 3) psychosocial risk factors. Additionally to investigate whether adherence differed between physiotherapists working in private clinics and physiotherapists working at public healthcare centres. Methods. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 817 Danish physiotherapists. Adherence to the three guideline domains was assessed using two vignettes. The difference in adherence between the groups was assessed using the chi-squared test. Results. Response rate was 29%. The proportions of physiotherapists giving advice that was strictly in line with the guideline domains were 32% (activity), 16% (work) and 82% (psychosocial risk factors) for Vignette 1 and 6% (activity), 53% (work) and 60% (psychosocial risk factors) for Vignette 2. Physiotherapists working at public healthcare centres were more likely to manage patients strictly in line with National Clinical Guidelines for assessing the psychosocial risk factors. Regarding the two other domains, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of adherence. Conclusion. Overall, the participating Danish physiotherapists strictly adhered to only one out of three key domains. This confirms the importance of identifying barriers to implementation of the National Clinical Guidelines in physiotherapy care for patients with LBP, including implementation of the inherent bio-psychosocial model. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: None

Background. Specifically designed control interventions can account for expectation effects in clinical trials. For the interpretation of efficacy trials of physical, psychological, and self-management interventions for people living with pain, the design, conduct, and reporting of control interventions is crucial. Objectives. To establish a quality standard in the field, core recommendations are presented alongside additional considerations and a reporting checklist for control interventions. Methods. Three Delphi rounds with 64 experts in placebo research and/or non-pharmacological clinical trials were conducted. The panel was presented with a systematic review and meta-analysis of control and blinding methods. A draft guidance document included 63 consensus items (≥80% agreement) and was discussed with patient partners. Finally, the draft guidance and results from stakeholder interviews were discussed at consensus meetings with Delphi participants and patient representatives. Results. Forty-four experts completed the process. When treatment efficacy or mechanisms are to be studied, the advocated principle is to design control interventions as similar as possible to the tested intervention, apart from the components that the study examines. Structured reasoning in the planning phase, early engagement with stakeholders, feasibility work, and piloting will enhance the quality and acceptability of control interventions. With participant blinding being a primary objective, blinding effectiveness should be routinely assessed and reported. Transparent and detailed reporting will improve interpretability and repeatability of clinical trials. Conclusion. This guideline provides the much-needed standards to enhance the quality of efficacy clinical trials in physical, psychological, and self-management intervention research, ultimately improving patient care. Study registration: . https://osf.io/jmyhq/. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Sources of Funding: Alain and Sheila Diamond Charitable Trust PhD Studentship

Spondylodiscitis is an uncommon condition with an incidence of 1:100,000 to 1:250,000 in developed countries. Diagnosis and treatment can be delayed resulting in poor outcomes. A high index of suspicion is necessary considering the associated mortality, reported at 2–17%. Establishing a diagnosis can be challenging as features are non-specific and onset may be insidious. While treatment is usually conservative, certain situations require surgery. All patients however require careful assessment and monitoring for complications that may require further intervention. A review of our practice in Wexham Park and Heatherwood Hospital NHS Trust from 2009 to 2013 produced a guideline suggesting the need for blood cultures, imaging with MRI and involvement of the infectious diseases and spinal teams. We re-audited (20 cases) to assess compliance with the guidelines, which were in place to reduce the delay in diagnosis. Recurrent presentation, infections of unknown origin and deterioration after a short course of antibiotics were indicators for triggering imaging of the spine for discitis. Delays in diagnosis were more marked in bacterial cases rather than tuberculosis. It was impossible to predetermine patients that would require surgical intervention. Our compliance with the guideline had improved from 70 to over 90% and there were no relapses or mortality

A statement of the purposes of the study and background:. Merely publishing clinical guidelines is insufficient to ensure their implementation in clinical practice. We aimed to clarify the decision-making processes that result in the delivery of particular treatments to patients with low back pain (LBP) in primary care and to examine clinicians' perspectives on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines for managing LBP in primary care. A summary of the methods used and the results:. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 53 purposively-sampled clinicians from south-west England. Participants were: 16 General Practitioners (GPs), 10 chiropractors, 8 acupuncturists, 8 physiotherapists, 7 osteopaths, and 4 nurses. Thematic analysis showed that official guidelines comprised just one of many inputs to clinical decision-making. Clinicians drew on personal experience and inter-professional networks and were constrained by organisational factors when deciding which treatment to prescribe, refer for, or deliver to an individual patient with LBP. Some found the guideline terminology - “non-specific LBP” - unfamiliar and of limited relevance to practice. They were frustrated by disparities between recommendations in the guidelines and the real-world situation of short consultation times, difficult-to-access specialist services and sparse commissioning of guideline-recommended treatments. A conclusion:. The NICE guidelines for managing LBP in primary care are one, relatively peripheral, influence on clinical decision-making among GPs, chiropractors, acupuncturists, physiotherapists, osteopaths, and nurses. When revised, these guidelines could be made more clinically relevant by: ensuring guideline terminology reflects clinical practice terminology; dispelling the image of guidelines as rigid and prohibiting patient-centred care; providing opportunities for clinicians to engage in experiential learning about guideline-recommended therapies; and commissioning guideline-recommended treatments for NHS patients

Background. Information about low back pain (LBP) and help to support patients' self-management are recommended in the majority of guidelines for LBP management. However, the delivery of patient information and advice can be time consuming, and with short available consultation times for general practitioners (GPs), new methods to support the delivery of sufficient patient information is called for. Purpose. To identify general practitioners' perspectives on recommending online information to patients with LBP. Methods. Danish GPs varying in age and professional interests were recruited to interviewing in their practices (their working environment). The interviews were based on a semi-structured interview guide, based on a value-led method, and inspired by think aloud methods,. Results. Eight 60-Minutes interviews were conducted. For GPs to recommend online LBP information, it is essential to target the information to their patients. GPs expressed the possible advantages by involving both healthcare professionals and patients in the development of the online information material by aligning the content with the face-to-face delivered information. Furthermore, the content should be guideline concordant. However, GPs expressed that some patients had problems with accessing and understanding health-related LBP information. Conclusion. When developing online information, the content should be supported by evidence and it is important to involve patients' and GPs' preferences in the design process. Consequently, including the elements in evidence-based medicine. However, GPs do not consider online information material to be suited to all. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Funded by ARs' Honour in Medical Research from Magda and Svend Aage Friederichs Memorial Fund and the Novo Nordic Foundation

Purpose of study. The Royal College of Radiology (RCR) provides guideline criteria to order lumbar spine X-rays for back pain. An audit was undertaken in our hospital to see compliance with this guideline. Methods. 200 lumbar spine radiology requests received in the hospital radiology department from General Practitioners over a 12 month period were identified. These 200 requests and their corresponding radiology reports were retrospectively analyzed. Results. Out of the 200 patients 80 were male and 120 were female. 1 patient was < 18 years, 75 patients were between 18 and 55 years, 52 patients were between 55 and 70 and 72 patients were > 70 years of age. Only 125 patients satisfied the RCR criteria for requiring a Lumbar Spine X-ray. 104 of these 125 patients met the criteria only because of age (> 55). The remaining 21 had other criteria like history of malignancy, osteoporosis or trauma that required imaging. Of the 200 X-rays the only significant pathology that was identified from the report was osteoporotic fractures in 35 patients. The most commonest diagnostic report was spondylosis which was seen in 92 patients. Among the 75 patients between the age of 18 and 55 only 2 fulfilled the criteria for requiring a lumbar spine X-ray. Hence 73 (36.5%) X-rays were outside the criteria. Among the 52 patients between the ages of 55 and 70 only 6 had a criteria other than age. Conclusion. This limited study demonstrates the following two possibilities. More stricter adherence to guidelines in patients aged 18 to 55. In this study 73 (36.5%) X-rays could have been avoided by this method. We believe that there is a case for the college to increase the age related criteria from 55 to 70 to be at par with American guidelines. If this method was used an additional 46 (23%) X-rays could have been avoided

Purpose of the study. We report septic shock as postoperative complication following an instrumented posterior spinal arthrodesis on a patient with multiple body piercings. The management of this potentially catastrophic complication and outcome of treatment is been discussed. Summary of Background Data. Body piercing has become increasingly more common due to change in culture or as a fashion statement. This has been associated with local or generalized ill effects including tissue injury, skin and systemic infections, and septic shock. There is no clear guideline pathway regarding removal and reinsertion of body piercings in patients who undergo major surgery. Complications following Orthopaedic or Spinal procedures associated with body piercing have not been reported. Methods. We reviewed the medical notes and radiographs of an adolescent patient with severe Scheuermann's kyphosis and multiple body piercings who underwent an uneventful posterior spinal arthrodesis with pedicle hook/screw/rod instrumentation and autologous iliac crest bone graft and developed septic shock. Results. Septic shock developed on postoperative day 2 after reinsertion of all piercings following patient's request. The patient became systemically very unwell and required intensive medical management, as well as a total course of antibiotics of 3 months. The piercings remained in situ. She did not develop a wound infection despite the presence of bacteraemia (coagulase-negative Staphylococci/Streptococci warneri) and spinal instrumentation. The patient had no new piercings subsequent to her deformity procedure. Two and a half years after spinal surgery she reported no medical problems, had a balanced spine with no loss of kyphosis correction and no evidence of nonunion or recurrence of deformity. Conclusion. The development of septic shock as a result of piercing reinsertion in the postoperative period has not been previously reported. This is an important consideration to prevent potentially life-threatening complications following major spinal surgery. Despite the wide array of complications associated to body art there are no clear guidelines for body piercing. There is growing public awareness and several countries are laying regulations which have not yet been internationally standardized. A clear practice guideline in the perioperative management of piercings is needed as the incidence of body piercing and associated complications is rising. There is need for surgeons to be aware of the hazards of body piercing and its implications. We propose that multiple piercings should not be reinserted after major surgery and appropriate counseling should be provided to the patients as part of the consent process

Purpose. This review aims to explore the methodologies used for estimating the direct and indirect costs attributed to back pain in developed countries. Methods. Six databases were searched to uncover studies about the direct and indirect costs of back pain published in English upto November 2016. Data extracted included study characteristics, cost categories and analysis methods. Results were synthesised descriptively. Results. The search identified 8009 potential studies, of which 40 were included for data extraction. The included studies reported data from 14 industrialised countries with considerably varying methodologies. Most of the studies (n=25) followed a retrospective study design and cost perspective was largely societal (n=26). Nearly half of the selected studies included indirect costs in their analysis as well as direct costs; and the proportion of indirect costs in most of the studies far outweighed the direct costs (3:1 ratio). The analysis method used most frequently was the top-down approach (n=13) followed by bottom-up approach (n=7) and econometric methods (n=7). Inpatient costs and absenteeism costs were the most important cost drivers accounting for 12%−35% of the direct costs and 5%−67% of the indirect costs respectively. The healthcare costs associated with back pain in the UK were estimated at £1.6 billion in 1998 while the indirect costs ranged from £5 billion to £10.7 billion. Conclusions. This is the first methodological systematic review assessing the costs of back pain. Despite differences in methodology, the economic burden of back pain is significant. Development of guideline and standardisation of methodologies is needed for future studies. Conflict of interest: None. Sources of funding: None

Purpose of the study and background. Physical activity and exercise therapy are among the guideline recommendations for the rehabilitation of people with chronic low back pain (CLBP ≥ 3 months); however, patient adherence is often poor. CONNECT is a theory-based communication skills training programme designed to enhance physiotherapists' support of their CLBP patients' psychological needs in order to increase adherence to their home-based rehabilitation programme. Methods and results. The CONNECT trial [Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN63723433] included six Dublin-area public clinics and their physiotherapists (n = 24) who received eight hours of communication skills training from a psychologist [experimental group] and physiotherapists (n = 26) from six equivalent clinics who formed a treatment as usual pragmatic control condition. New patients (n = 255, 54% female) diagnosed with CLBP and receiving physiotherapy at one of these clinics completed ratings of home-based adherence at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after their initial treatment session; 24 weeks was the primary endpoint. Due to the nature of the intervention, physiotherapists were aware of treatment allocation; patients and assessors were blinded. Intention to treat analysis using a linear mixed model approach indicated that patients in the experimental group rated their home-based adherence significantly higher than patients in the control condition across time-points (P = .01), but the difference was not significant at the 24-week follow-up (P > .05). Conclusions. The CONNECT intervention had a positive effect on patients' self-rated adherence to home-based rehabilitation for CLBP, but the impact was not maintained over 24 weeks. Further analysis from the CONNECT trial will investigate its effects on pain and function, as well as hypothesised mediators of change

Aim

Identifying cervical spine injuries in confused or comatose patients with multiple injuries provides a diagnostic challenge. Our aim was to investigate the protocols which are used for the clearance of the cervical spine in these patients in English hospitals.

Objectives

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).