Introduction:. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is extremely effective in treating debilitating arthritic conditions of the hip. With the many modular prosthetic designs available, surgeons can now precisely construct mechanical parameters such as femoral offset (FO). Although several studies have investigated relationships between offset choice and hip abductor strength, hip range of motion, and prosthetic wear rate, there is scarce data on the effect of FO on pain and functional outcomes following THA. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of restoring FO (within varying degrees compared to the contralateral non-diseased hip [CL]) on physical function, mental well-being, pain, and stiffness outcomes as measured by the Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at post-operative follow-up. Methods:. We prospectively collected data on 249 patients that underwent unilateral THA with no or minimal disease of the contralateral hip. Baseline data collection included: age, gender, diagnosis, femoral head size, type of stem, and pre-operative SF-12 and WOMAC scores. Post-operative SF-12 and WOMAC scores were recorded during annual follow-up visits. Post-operative FO was retrospectively measured on standard anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs and compared to FO of CL. FO was measured as the perpendicular distance from the femoral head center of rotation to the anatomic axis of the femur with appropriate adjustments made for image magnification. Patients were categorized into one of three groups: decreased femoral offset (dFO, less than −5 mm compared to CL), normal femoral offset (nFO, between −5 and +5 mm of CL), and increased femoral offset (iFO, greater than +5 mm compared to CL). Results:. In all, 31 patients were categorized into dFO, 163 categorized into nFO, and 55 categorized into iFO. At baseline, the groups differed in categorical diagnoses (p = 0.01). Further analysis revealed a higher percentage of posttraumatic arthritis in dFO as compared to nFO and iFO (12.9%, 1.2%, and 1.8%, respectively). Moreover, a higher percentage of hip dysplasia was present in iFO as compared to nFO and dFO (14.5%, 3.6%, and 6.5%, respectively). Pre-operatively, dFO had lower WOMAC Pain scores than nFO and iFO (29.68, 43.39, and 43.63, respectively; p < 0.005). (Please see Table 1 for comparison of baseline characteristics between groups.) All other pre-operative demographic and survey characteristics were similar. At most recent post-operative follow-up, dFO had lower WOMAC Physical Function scores than nFO and iFO (72.03, 83.23, and 79.51, respectively; p < 0.02) (see Table 2). Discussion:. Reduction of patients' native FOs by greater than 5 mm during THA can lead to inferior levels of physical function. Furthermore, increasing FO by greater than 5 mm did not lead to increased levels of pain nor decreased levels of function

Introduction:. Implant dislocations are often caused by implant or bone impingement, and less impingement is critical to prevent dislocations. Several reports demonstrated that greater femoral offset delayed bony impingement and led to an improved range of motion (ROM) after THA. Therefore, an increase in the femoral offset may improve ROM and decrease implant dislocation. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of the femoral offset in avoiding component or bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods:. Seventy-eight patients underwent THA with a Pinnacle cup and Summit stem (DePuy). Intraoperative kinematic analysis was performed with a navigation system, which was used to obtain intraoperative range of motion (ROM) measurements during trial insertion of stems of 2 different offset lengths with the same head size. Further, ROM was also measured after actual component insertion. Results:. Maximal ROM was independent of the femoral offset of the stem in each patient (Figure 1). Further, we measured the intraoperative maximal ROM corresponding to high offset stems of 2 different lengths (stem sizes 1–3; + 6 mm, stem sizes 4–9; +8 mm), and compared the maximal ROMs between the standard- and high-offset stems. There were no statistically significant differences (Figure 2). These results indicate that an excessive offset length of the stem may not affect ROM. We also analyzed the correlation between femoral offset length and ROM, and found that the range of external rotation was significantly greater in patients with greater femoral offset (RR = 0.36, P = 0.02) (Figure 3). However, we could not show any correlation for the ROM values in the other planes of motion. Discussions:. Summit stem is available in 9 different sizes with standard offset lengths ranging from 36.0 mm to 44.0 mm. The average offset of Summit stem was larger than other stems. These differences in offset length could be the reason why the high offset stem did not change maximal ROM in our study. Further, the summit stem employs 2 different types of high offset lengths (+6 mm and +8 mm). We did not find any difference in maximal ROM even after using the +8 mm high offset stem. Our results indicated that even the Summit standard offset stem might have enough femoral offset to avoid implant/bone impingement. However, several reports showed that increasing stem offset increased the bending moment on the prosthesis and increased the strain in the medial cortex, and may lead to early failure of the femoral component. Nevertheless, selection of the offset stem should be performed carefully to prevent offset complications

Proper restoration of posterior condylar offset during TKA has been shown to be important to maximize range of motion and minimize flexion instability. However, there is little information as to the importance of restoration of mid-sagittal femoral geometry. There is controversy as to whether a TKA prosthesis should have a single radius or multiple radii of curvature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-radius femoral component at restoring mid sagittal femoral offset. A consecutive series of 100 TKAs with digital preoperative and postoperative radiographs and standardized radiographic markers were analyzed. There were 71 female and 29 male knees with mean age of 59 years. All TKAs were performed by a single surgeon using a multi-radius femoral component design. The distal femoral resection was set to resect 10 mm from the distal femoral condyle and a posterior referencing system was used to size the femoral component. Using radiographic perfect lateral projections of the knees, a line was drawn along the posterior femoral shaft and another parallel line down the anterior femoral shaft. A 3rd line was then drawn parallel to the posterior shaft at the furthest point posterior on the condyle. A 4th line was drawn parallel to the anterior shaft at the furthest point anterior on the femur. 90 degree angles were constructed to create a grid in the anterior and posterior directions, similar to a previously reported technique. Finally, 45 degree angle lines were created in the grid to assess mid flexion dimensions [Fig-1 and 2]. The percent change in posterior condylar offset (PCO), anterior femoral offset (AFO), mid femoral anterior offset (MAFO) and mid femoral posterior offset (MFPO) were calculated. The mean reproduction of the mid-anterior femoral offset and mid-posterior femoral offset were 101.1% [range 56.5%–167.5%] and 96.8% [range 54.9%–149.0%] of preoperative measurements respectively. The average restoration of posterior offset and anterior offset were 92.8% [range 49.0%–129.8%] and 115.3% of preoperative measurements [range 35.7%–400.0%] respectively. When the posterior condylar offset was restored to within 10% of the native anatomy, the MPFO restoration more closely resembled normal anatomy (103.0% vs. 93.9%, p = 0.005). When the postoperative posterior condylar offset was decreased greater than 20%, both the MAFO (90.1% vs. 104.5%, p = 0.004) and MPFO (78.5% vs. 102.9%, p < 0.001) decreased compared to the native knee. There was no relationship between restoration of the PCO and the MAFO correction (104.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.213). Finally, there was no correlation between restoration of anterior femoral offset within 10% of normal and the restoration of mid sagittal femoral offset; 98.0% vs 102.0% for MAFO (p = 0.320) and 98.7% vs 96.3% for MPFO (p = 0.569). A modern multi-radius condylar knee design is capable of reproducing the mid-sagittal geometry of the preoperative knee. However, the restoration of mid sagittal offset is largely dependent on the restoration of the posterior condylar offset. Intraoperative adjustments in anterior and posterior femoral resections can have significant impact in the ability of the implant to reproduce mid-sagittal femoral anatomy

Introduction. Total hip replacement (THR) is a very common procedure performed for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. The aim of THR is to restore function and quality of life of the patients, by restoring femoral offset, leg length, centre of rotation, and achieving stability, to avoid dislocation postoperatively. Method. We aimed to perform preoperative assessment of femoral offset on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the hip, and on corresponding CT scans, for patients undergoing primary THR. Patients were positioned according to a standardised protocol prior to obtaining radiographs of the hip and CT scan. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was evaluated between 3 observers of differing levels of seniority – an orthopaedic trainee, a fellow, and a consultant. CT scan measurements of offset were performed by one consultant radiologist. The researchers measuring radiographic offset were blinded to the results of the CT measurements. Results. In the entire cohort of 50 patients, the mean femoral offset was 44 mm on AP radiographs of the hip and 45 mm on CT scans. No significant difference in mean femoral offset was seen between AP radiographs of the hip and CT. There was good inter and intra-observer reliability in the measurement of femoral offset on AP radiographs of the hip. There was no difference in the radiographic measurements between observers of differing levels of seniority. Conclusions. Accurate restoration of femoral offset is very important in the good functioning of THR. AP radiographs of the hip are accurate, and should be routinely obtained preoperatively for templating, prior to THR

Introduction. One of the important criteria of the success of TKR is achievement of the Flexion ROM. Various factors responsible to achieve flexion are technique, Implant and patient related. Creation of the Posterior condylar offset is one such important factor to achieve satisfactory flexion. Aim. To correlate post op femoral condylar offset to final flexion ROM at 1 yr. post op. Methods. This is a clinico-radiological study of the cases done prospectively between September 2011 and August 2012. Inclusion criteria:. All patients undergoing Bilateral TKRs and have agreed for the follow up at 1 yr. Exclusion criteria:. Patients who had previous bony surgery on lower end femur. Patients with previous fracture of lower end femur. All the patients had PS PFC Sigma (De Puy, Warsaw) components cemented. ROMs were measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, & 1 year post op. The last reading was taken as final flexion ROM as measured by a Physiotherapist with the help of a Goniometer. Results. We had 21 cases of Bilateral TKRs who satisfied our criteria. Pre and post op femoral condylar offset was measured in mm. on lateral x ray. Pre and post op flexion was measured. Results showed that variation in the posterior femoral offset by > 3mm in post op x ray was related to loss of flexion of an average 21 deg. (16 – 24 degrees). Greater the deflection from the normal offset, greater was the loss of flexion. These patients also showed lesser improvement in KSS functional score. Discussion. Flexion is one of the most important yardsticks for the measurement of success of TKR. This factor is more important more so in Asian population. Literature has shown that three important determinants for good flexion are…. Posterior Condylar Offset Restoration. Tibial slope restoration. Femoral Roll back in flexion. An increased offset permits greater flexion before impingement between the tibial insert and the femur. In our study we kept Tibial slope and Femoral Roll back constant by using the same prosthesis. The femoral condylar offset changed as per the size of the AP femoral cutting block. (Anterior referencing guide used). Overresection of the posterior condyles reduced the posterior femoral condylar offset and hence significant loss of post op flexion. The shorter posterior condyle of smaller femoral component can increase the potential for bone impingement proximal to the posterior condyles. In our study the opposite side replaced knee acted as a control. It is generally stated that after a TKR flexion can improve upto 1 year and hence was taken as final possible flexion. Conclusion. Keeping Tibial slope and Femoral roll back constant during the surgery, posterior condylar offset restoration within 3 mm of its original pre op offset was necessary to achieve satisfactory flexion at 1 year. Undersizing the femoral component to achieve more flexion is perhaps suboptimal. Appropriate AP femoral sizing is a must to restore the normal offset

INTRODUCTION. One of the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to restore an adequate range of motion. The posterior femoral offset (PFO) may have a significant influence on the final flexion angle after TKA. The purpose of the present study was to compare the conventional, radiologic measurement of the PFO before and after TKA to the intra-operative, navigated measurement of the antero-posterior femoral dimension before and after TKA implantation. MATERIAL. 100 consecutive cases referred for end-stage knee osteo-arthritis have been included. Inclusion criteria were the availability of pre-TKA and post-TKA lateral X-rays and a navigated TKA implantation. There was no exclusion criterion. METHODS. Pre-TKA and post-TKA digital lateral X-rays were performed with fluoroscopic control of the superposition of both femoral. The PFO was defined as the distance between the anterior femoral cortex and the most posterior point of the femoral condyles (figure 1). The TKA was implanted with help of a navigation system. The standard navigated procedure involves a navigated palpation of the anterior femoral cortex just proximal to the trochlea (figure 2) and a navigated palpation of the most posterior point of both femoral condyles (figure 3), allowing computation of the pre-TKA navigated PFO. The post-TKA PFO was calculated according to the the antero-posterior position of the prosthetic trochlea in comparison to the anterior femoral cortex and the size of the femoral implant. Pre-TKA and post-TKA radiologic and navigated measurements of the PFO were compared with a paired Student t-test and calculation of the coefficient of linear correlation. The coherence between the data was analyzed according to Bland-Altman. The radiologic and navigated PFO changes were compared with a paired Student t-test and calculation of the coefficient of linear correlation. The sample size was calculated to allow detecting a 3 mm difference at a 0.05 level of significance and a power of 0.90. All statistical tests were performed at a 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS. The mean paired difference between pre-TKA radiologic and navigated measurement was 3.8 mm ± 4.1 mm (range, −5.2 to 17.9 mm) (p<0.001). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between both measurements (R² = 0.41, p<0.001). There was a good coherence between both measurements (R² = 0.04). The mean paired difference between post-TKA radiologic and navigated measurement was 5.9 mm ± 4.8 mm (range, −24.0 to 16.9 mm) (p<0.001). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between both measurements (R² = 0.51, p<0.001). There was a poor coherence between both measurements (R² = 0.11). The mean paired radiologic PFO change was 1.5 mm ± 5.2 mm. The mean paired navigated PFO change was −0.9 mm ± 4.0 mm (range, −14.0 to 12.2 mm) (p<0.001). There was a significant weak positive correlation between both measurements (R² = 0.21, p<0.001). There was a good coherence between both measurements (R² = 0.002). DISCUSSION. We observed a significant difference between radiologic and navigated results. This difference is likely to be clinically significant. CONCLUSION. Radiological measurement of the femoral offset is not reliable either before or after TKA

Introduction. Accurate evaluation of femoral offset is difficult with conventional anteroposterior (AP) X-rays. Routine CT imaging is costly and exposes patients to a significant dose of radiation. The EOS® imaging system is an innovative slot-scanning radiography system that makes possible the acquisition of simultaneous and orthogonal AP and lateral images of the patient in standing position. These 2-dimensional (2D) images are equivalent to standard plane X-rays. Three-dimension (3D) reconstructions are obtained from these paired images according to a validated protocol. This prospective study explores for the first time the value of the EOS® imaging system for comparing measurements of femoral offset obtained from 2D images and 3D reconstructions. Materials and Methods. Following our standard protocol, we included a series of 100 patients with unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). The 2D offset was measured on the AP view with the same protocol as for standard X-rays. The 3D offset was calculated from the reconstructions based on the orthogonal AP and lateral views. Reproducibility and repeatability studies were conducted for each measurement. We compared the 2D and 3D offsets for both hips (with and without THA). Results. For the global series (100 hips with and 100 without THA), the 2D offset was 40 mm (SD: 7.3; range 7 to 57 mm). The standard deviation was 6.5 mm for repeatability and 7.5 mm for reproducibility. The 3D offset was 43 mm (SD: 6.6; range 22 to 62 mm), with a standard deviation of 4.6 mm for repeatability and 5.5 mm for reproducibility. The 2D offset for the hips without THA was 40 mm (SD: 7.0; range 26 to 56 mm), and the 3D offset was 43 mm (SD: 6.6; range 28 to 62 mm). For the THA side, the 2D offset was 41 mm (SD: 8.2; range 7 to 57 mm) and the 3D offset was 45 mm (SD: 4.8; range 22 to 61 mm). Comparison of the two protocols shows a significant difference between the 2D and 3D measurements, with the 3D offsets having higher values. Comparison of the sides with and without surgery for each case showed a 5-mm deficit for the offset in 35% of the patients according to the 2D measurement but in only 26% according to the 3D calculation. Conclusions. This study highlights the limitations of 2D measurements of femoral offset on plane X-rays. The reliability of the EOS® 3D models has been previously demonstrated with CT scan reconstructions as a reference. The EOS® imaging system could be an option for obtaining accurate and reliable offset measurements while significantly limiting the patient's exposure to radiation

Purpose. Instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an unfortunately frequent and serious problem that requires through evaluation and preoperative planning before surgical intervention. Prevention through optimal index surgery is of great importance, as the management of an unstable THA is challenging even for an experienced joints surgeon. However, even after well-planned surgery, a significant incidence of recurrent instability still exists. As you know Sir John Charnley is one of the first orthopaedic surgeons to address the issue of soft-tissue tensioning (STT) in the THA. Moreover leg-length discrepancy (LLD) after THA can pose a substantial problem for the orthopaedic surgeon. Such discrepancy has been associated with complications including nerve palsy, low back pain, and abnormal gait. The objective of this study is to assess hip instability of three different FOs in same patient undergoing THA during an operation. Methods. We performed 70 patients who had undergone unilateral THA using CT based navigation system at a single institution for advanced osteoarthoritis from May 2013 to May 2014. We used postero-lateral approach in all patients. After cup and stem implantation, we assessed soft tissue tensioning in THA during operation. Trial necks were categorized into one of three groups: standard femoral offset (sFO), high femoral offset (hFO, +4mm compared to sFO) and extensive high femoral offset (ehFO, +8 mm compared to sFO). We measured distance of lift-off about each of three femoral necks using CT based navigation system and a force gauge with hip flexed at 0 degrees and 30 degrees under a traction of lower extremity. Traction force was 40% of body weight. Results. Forty patients had leg length restored to within +/− 5mm of the contralateral side by post-operative CT analysis. We examined these patients. Traction force was 214±41.1Nm. The distances of lift-off were 8.8±4.5mm (sFO), 7.4±4.1mm (eFO), 5.1±3.9mm (ehFO) with 0 degrees hip flexion and neutral abduction(Abd) / adduction(Add) and neutral internal rotation(IR)/external rotation(ER). The distance of lift-off were 11.5±5.9mm (sFO), 10.5±5.5mm (eFO),ã��9.1±5.9mm (ehFO) with 30 degrees hip flexion and neutral Abd / Add and neutral IR/ER. Significant difference was observed between 0 degrees hip flexion and 30 degrees hip flexion on each FO (p<0.05). On changing the distance of lift-off, hFO to ehFO (2.2±1.6mm) was more stable than sFO to hFO (1.4±1.7mm)with 0degrees hip flexion.(p<0.05). On the other hands, hFO to ehFO (1.4±1.6mm) was more stable than sFO to hFO (1.0±1.3mm) with 30 degrees hip flexion. However, we did not find significant difference (p=0.18). Conclusion. Hip instability was found at 30 degrees hip flexion more than at 0 degrees hip flexion. We found that changing from eFO to ehFO can lead to more stability improvement of soft tissue tensioning than sFO to eFO, especially at 0 degrees hip flexion

Aim of the study was to analyse the modifications of the pre-op and post-op femoral off-set after cementless total hip replacement.

During an 18-month period, from January 2015 to June 2016, we retrospectively analysed data of 79 (n = 81 hips) patients (M:F = 31:48), with an average age of 70.38 yrs ± 10.05, who consecutively affered to our Department and underwent cementless total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis with Pinnacle Gription^TM cup and Corail^TM stem (Depuy). All cases of infections and revision surgery were excluded. Inclusion criteria: postero-lateral approach, 2 dedicated surgeons. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated at 4-months and 1-year postop. Preop and postop femoral off-set were calculated using Impax Agfa software.

Average preop HHS was 46.7 ± 7.7; at 4-months post-op 86.4 ± 5.7; at 1-year post-op 90.0 ± 5 (the improvement had a statistically significant p-value). There was no statistical significant difference between the preop and postop off-set values obtained (t-student test). In 38 (46.9%) hips we increased the femoral off-set and we analysed using χ₂-test if there was a correlation with hip pain, HHS and dislocation. There was no statistical significance.

Our overall results show good and excellent clinical results at 1 year follow-up in cementless total hip replacement. We believe that our pre-op digital planning of the implant and the offset obtained is a crucial step in determining these results.

Introduction

A decrease of 15% in femoral off-set (FO) was reported to generate a weakness of the abductor muscle after THA, which may increase the risk of limping and dislocation. However, this value was defined under experimental conditions using a CYBEX machine, which does not correspond to daily life activities. To our best knowledge, there is no reported study about the effect of the FO alteration on the gait, following THA.

Introduction:. One of the important criteria of the success of TKR is achievement of the Flexion ROM. Various factors responsible to achieve flexion are technique, Implant and patient related. Creation of the Posterior condylar offset is one of the important factors to achieve satisfactory flexion. Aim:. To correlate post op femoral condylar offset to final flexion ROM at 1 yr. post op. Methods:. This is a clinico-radiological study of the cases done prospectively between September 2011 and August 2012. Inclusion criteria:. All patients undergoing Bilateral TKRs and have agreed for the follow up at 1 yr. Exclusion criteria: . 1). Patients who had previous bony surgery on lower end femur. 2). Patients with previous fracture of lower end femur. All the patients had PS PFC Sigma (De Puy, Warsaw) components cemented. ROMs were measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, & 1 year post op. The last reading was taken as final flexion ROM as measured by an independent Physiotherapist with the help of a Goniometer. Results:. We had 21 cases of Bilateral TKRs who satisfied our criteria. Pre and post op femoral condylar offset was measured in mm. on lateral x ray. Pre and post op flexion was measured. Results showed that variation in the posterior femoral offset by > 3 mm in post op x ray was related to loss of flexion of an average 21 deg. (16–24 degrees). Greater the deflection from the normal offset, greater was the loss of flexion. These patients also showed lesser improvement in KSS functional sco. Discussion:. Flexion is one of the most important yardsticks for the measurement of success of TKR. This factor is more important more so in Asian population. Literature has shown that three important determinants for good flexion are…. . 1). Posterior Condylar Offset Restoration. 2). Tibial slope restoration. 3). Femoral Roll back in flexion. An increased offset permits greater flexion before impingement between the tibial insert and the femur. In our study we kept Tibial slope and Femoral Roll back constant by using the same prosthesis. The femoral condylar offset changed as per the size of the AP femoral cutting block. (Anterior referencing guide used). Overresection of the posterior condyles reduced the posterior femoral condylar offset and hence significant loss of post op flexion. The shorter posterior condyle of smaller-sized femoral component can increase the potential for bone impingement proximal to the posterior condyles. In our study the opposite side replaced knee acted as a control and hence eliminating patient bius. It is generally stated that after a TKR flexion can improve upto 1 year and hence that was taken as final possible flexion. Conclusion:. Keeping Tibial slope and Femoral roll back constant during the surgery, posterior condylar offset restoration within 3 mm of its original pre op offset was necessary to achieve satisfactory flexion at 1 year. Undersizing the femoral component to achieve more flexion is perhaps suboptimal. Appropriate AP femoral sizing is a must to restore the normal offset

Introduction. Range of motion (ROM) simulation of the hip is useful to understand the maximum impingement free ROM in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In spite of a complex multi-directional movement of the hip in daily life, most of the previous reports have evaluated the ROM only in specific directions such as flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal - external rotation at 0° or 90° of hip flexion. Therefore, we developed ROM simulation software (THA analyzer) to measure impingement free ROM in any positions of the hip. Recent designs of the hip implants give a wider ROM by increasing the head diameter and then, bone to bone impingement can be a ROM limit factor particularly in a combination of deep flexion, adduction and internal rotation of the hip. Therefore, the purpose of this study were to observe an individual variation in the pattern of the bone impingement ROM in normal hip bone models using this software, to classify the bone impingement ROM mapping types and to clarify the factors affecting the bone impingement type. Methods. The subjects were 15 normal hips of 15 patients. Three dimensional surface models of the pelvis and femur were reconstructed from Computer tomography (CT) images. We performed virtual hip implantation with the same center of rotation, femoral offset, and leg length as the original hips. Subsequently, we created the ROM mapping until bone impingement using THA analyzer. We measured the following factors influenced on the bone impingement map patterns; the neck shaft angle, the femoral offset, femoral anteversion, pelvic tilt, acetabular anteversion, sharp angle, and CE angle. These factors were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with Mann-Whitney U test, and statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results. According to the borderline of ROM at the flexion-internal rotation corner on the bone impingement map, the hips were classified into two groups; group-A showed more than 45° of the borderline slope at the flexion-internal rotation corner and the remaining hips were group-B. (Fig.1). There were 7 hips in group-A and 8 hips in group-B. Femoral offset was 36.8±2.2 mm in group-A and 30±2.7 mm in group-B. Femoral anteversion was 32±6.4° in-group A and 43 ±4.8° in group-B. There were statistically significant differences in the femoral offset and femoral anteversion between the groups. There were no significant differences in the other factors. Discussion. The results of this study showed various ROM map patterns even in normal hips and we classified them into two groups. An increased femoral offset or a decreased femoral anteversion revealed an early impinge in internal rotation. ROM until bone impingement is affected by the individual bone morphology. However, it is not easy to evaluate bony ROM in complex hip positions. THA analyzer shows the impingement position visually on the map and it is easy to understand the hip positions with reduced ROMs. Conclusion. There are two patterns on the bony ROM map in normal hips, and an early impinge in internal rotation occurred by increasing the femoral offset or decreasing the femoral anteversion. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Increasing femoral offset in total hip replacement (THR) has several benefits including improved hip abductor strength and enhanced range of motion. Biomechanical studies have suggested that this may negatively impact on stem stability. However, it is unclear whether this has a clinical impact. Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), the aim of this study was to determine the impact of stem offset and stem size for the three most common cementless THR prostheses revised for aseptic loosening. The study period was September 1999 to December 2020. The study population included all primary procedures for osteoarthritis with a cementless THR using the Corail, Quadra-H and Polarstem. Procedures were divided into small and large stem sizes and by standard and high stem offset for each stem system. Hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age and gender, were performed to compare revision for aseptic loosening for offset and stem size for each of the three femoral stems. There were 55,194 Corail stems, 13,642 Quadra-H stem, and 13,736 Polarstem prostheses included in this study. For the Corail stem, offset had an impact only when small stems were used (sizes 8-11). Revision for aseptic loosening was increased for the high offset stem (HR=1.90;95% CI 1.53–2.37;p<0.001). There was also a higher revision risk for aseptic loosening for high offset small size Quadra-H stems (sizes 0-3). Similar to the Corail stem, offset did not impact on the revision risk for larger stems (Corail sizes 12-20, Quadra-H sizes 4-7). The Polarstem did not show any difference in aseptic loosening revision risk when high and standard offset stems were compared, and this was irrespective of stem size. High offset may be associated with increased revision for aseptic loosening, but this is both stem size and prosthesis specific

Introduction. The incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was reported to be 0.5 to 10% in primary THA and 10 to 25 % in revision THA. The main causes of instability after THA were reported to be implant malalignment and inappropriate soft tissue tension. However, there was no study about quantitative data of soft tissue tension of unstable THA. The purpose of this study is to clarify the features of soft tissue tension of unstable THA in comparison to stable THA. Methods. The subjects were 15 patients with 15 THAs who had developed recurrent dislocation after primary THA. Thirty four patients with 37 THAs who developed no dislocation for one year after surgery were recruited as a stable THA group. In both group, all THAs were performed through posterolateral approach. In order to assess the soft tissue tension of THA, we recorded antero-posterior radiographs of the hips while applying distal traction to the leg with traction forces of 20?, 30%, 40% of body weight (BW). The distance of separation of the head and the cup after traction was measured under correction of magnification. Nine of 15 THAs in the unstable THA group and 32 of 37 THAs in the stable THA group were unilateral involvement. In the hips with unilateral involvement, the femoral offset difference between the healthy hip and the reconstructed hip were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with χ2 testand Mann-Whitney U test, and statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results and Discussion. The average separation distance of the head and the cup was 5.2 ± 3.4mm (SD) at 40%BW, 4.3±3.2mm at 30%BW, and 3.2±2.8mm at 20%BW in the unstable THA group. The average separation distance of the head and the cup was 1.4±1.5mm at 40%BW, 1.1±1.4mm at 30%BW, and 0.9±1.2mm at 20%BW in the stable THA group. There were statistically significant differences in the separation distance between the groups in all ranges of traction force. The femoral offset difference between the operated side and the healthy side was −1.2±5.6mm in the unstable THA group and 3.1±4.8mm in the stable THA group. There were no significant difference in the femoral offset difference, however the femoral offset tends to be small in the unstable THA group compared to the stable THA group (P=0.05). The leg length discrepancy was −3.1±11.6mm in the unstable THA group and 2.7±7.1mm in the stable THA group. There were no significant difference in the leg length discrepancy (P=0.12). Conclusion. The separation distance of the head and the cup during leg distal traction in the unstable THA group is about four times larger than that in the stable THA group. The femoral offset tended to be smaller in the unstable THA group compared to the stable THA group

The elements of my routine pre-operative planning include skin and scar assessment, the limb length (physical exam and radiographic assessments), the socket type, the stem type, and radiographic templating. Blood management is rarely an issue for primary total hips today and I generally do not recommend pre-operative autologous donation. I currently use a low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis for most all patients. All of my patients have pre-operative medical clearance from a hospital intensivist. A press-fit modular cementless socket is my “workhorse”, although I occasionally use supplemental fixation with spikes (low bone density) or screws (shallow or otherwise deficient hemisphere). Cemented fixation is reserved for hips with radiation necrosis. I use a dual-offset tapered cementless stem in most cases but will use a modular stem in dysplastic, post-traumatic, or severely osteoporotic femurs. I template every case. My goals are to determine component sizes - “the part inside the bone” and improve the biomechanics of the hip – “the part outside the bone”. Sizing is relatively straightforward. For the socket, I use the teardrop and the superior bony edge as landmarks for size and position. I use a Johnson's lateral view radiograph to assess socket version and anterior osteophytes. With a tapered stem, proximal fit on the AP radiograph is the goal and the stem does not need to be canal filling. For the neck resection, I reference off the lesser trochanter. Medialisation of the hip center of rotation (COR) decreases the moment arm for body weight; increasing the femoral off-set lengthens the lever arm for the abductor muscles. These changes in hip biomechanics have a double benefit: a reduction in required abductor forces and lower joint reaction forces. There is accumulating clinical evidence that such favorable alterations in biomechanics can improve clinical outcomes and reduce wear. Higher femoral offset has been associated with greater hip abduction motion and abductor muscle strength. In two independent studies, higher femoral offset has been associated with a significant reduction in polyethylene wear. The traditional arthroplasty goal has been to re-create the offset of the operated hip. In an analysis of 41 patients with one arthritic hip and one clinically and radiographically normal hip (Rolfe et al., 2006 ORS), we found that the horizontal femoral offset of the arthritic hip was, on average, 6mm less than that of the normal, contralateral hip. Considering this, and with medialisation of the COR, is it reasonable to make the femoral offset a few millimeters greater than that pre-op. With modular trial components, final offset and limb-length adjustments are made intra-operatively by assessing soft tissue tension, joint stability and range of motion. Applying these principles in a consecutive series of 40 hips, the hip center of rotation was medialised by 5.6mm and the horizontal femoral offset was increased by an average of 9.5mm, being larger than the normal, contralateral hip by an average of 5.2mm. This combination increased the net biomechanical advantage (NBA) of the diseased hip to an average of 12.5% more than the normal, contralateral hip. The increase in femoral offset is compensated for by medialising the center of rotation. The average lateralisation of the proximal femur of 3.9mm did not cause trochanteric bursitis or other pain. When the offset is right, soft tissue tension can be maintained without over-lengthening. In this series, 2.9mm average lengthening resulted in the reconstructed limb being an average of 1.1mm shorter than the normal side

Introduction. When performing a total hip arthroplasty (THA), some surgeons routinely perform an intraoperative anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph to assess components. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the intraoperative radiograph to accurately reflect acetabular inclination, leg length, and femoral offset as compared to the immediate postoperative supine AP radiograph. Methods. The intraoperative (lateral decubitus position) and immediate postoperative (supine position) AP pelvis x-rays of 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular inclination, leg length, and femoral offset were measured on both radiographs. We analyzed the correlation coefficient of the recorded measurements between the two films as well as the interobserver reliability of each measurement obtained. Results. Our data demonstrated a high positive correlation between the intraoperative and postoperative acetabular inclination measurements of both reviewers (r=.886 and .896). In addition, no significant difference was observed between the inclination measurements (p= .06 and .37). There was a moderate correlation among the leg length (r= .58 and .66) and poor correlation among the offset (r= .29 and .25) between the two radiographs. One observer generated a significant difference between leg length measurements while both reviewers generated a significant difference between offset measurements. Interobserver reliability was high for all measurements. Conclusion. Intraoperative AP radiographs are commonly obtained during THA to aid in evaluation of component position and size, femoral neck cut, femoral canal fill, and detection of occult fractures. Results from this study suggest that this film could also be used to accurately measure acetabular inclination, but is a less reliable indicator of femoral offset and leg length when compared to the immediate postoperative film. In addition, the high interobserver correlation illustrates the high reproducibility of the measurement methods utilized

The problem associated with ceramic on ceramic total hip replacement (THR) is audible noise. Squeaking is the most frequently documented sound. The incidence of squeaking has been reported to wide range from 0.7 to 20.9%. Nevertheless there is no study to investigate on incidence of noise in computer assisted THR with ceramic on ceramic bearing. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risks factors associated with noise. We retrospectively reviewed 200 patients (202 hips) whom performed computer assisted THR (Orthopilot, B. Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany) with ceramic on ceramic bearing between March 2009 and August 2012. All procedures underwent uncemented THR with posterior approach by single surgeon. All hips implanted with PLASMACUP and EXIA femoral stem (B. Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany). All cases used BIOLOX DELTA (Ceramtec, AG, Plochingen, Germany) ceramic liner and head. The incidence and type of noise were interviewed by telephone using set of questionnaire. Patient's age, weight, height, body mass index, acetabular cup size, femoral offset size determined from medical record for comparing between silent hips and noisy hips. The acetabular inclination angle, acetabular anteversion angle, femoral offset, hip offset were reviewed to compare difference between silent hips and noisy hips. The audible noise was reported for 13 hips (6.44%). 5 patients (5 hips) reported click (2.47%) and 8 patients (8 hips) squeaked (3.97%). The mean time to first occurrence of click was 13.4 months and squeak was 7.4 months after surgery. Most common frequency of click was less than weekly (60%) and squeak was 1–4 times per week (50%). Most common activity associated with noise was bending; 40% in click and 75% in squeaking. No patients complained for pain or social problem. Moreover, no patient underwent any intervention for the noise. The noise had not self-resolved in any of the patients at last follow up. Age, weight, height and BMI showed no statistically significant difference between silent hips and click hips. In addition, there was also same result between silent hips and squeaking hips. Acetabular cup insert size and femoral offset stem size the results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between silent hips and click hips, also with squeaking hips. Acetabular inclination, angle acetabular anteversion angle, femoral offset, hip offset the results shown that only acetabular anteversion angle differed significantly between silent hips (19.94±7.78 degree) and squeaking hips (13.46±5.54 degree). The results can conclude that incidence of noise after ceramic on ceramic THR with navigation was 6.44 %. Squeaking incidence was 3.97% and click incidence was 2.47%. The only associated squeaking risk factor was cup anteversion angle. In this study, squeaking hip had cup anteversion angle significant less than silent hip

With the advent of digital radiology, our institution has introduced digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior studies of the accuracy of digital templating had contradictory results. This study compares the accuracy of digital and analog templating for THA. Ninety patients were recruited. Sixty-eight patients had analog pre-operative templating while 22 patients had digital templating. A retrospective review of medical records obtained the sizes of hip implants inserted during THA and patient demographics. The templated hip sizes were compared with the actual hip implants inserted. Accuracies of both templating methods were compared in four outcomes: prediction of acetabular cup size, prediction of femoral stem size, prediction of femoral offset and prediction of femoral neck length. Digital templating was more accurate than analog templating in predicting acetabular cup size, femoral stem size and femoral offset. Analog templating was more accurate in predicting femoral neck length. However, only the comparison of femoral offset achieved statistical significance (p-value = 0.049). After stratifying the data by BMI, digital templating was more accurate than analog templating in predicting acetabular cup and femoral stem sizes for patients with high BMI. For patients with BMI = 25-30, accuracy of digital templating was 100.0% for cup and 80.0% for stem while accuracy of analog templating was 74.1% for cup and 74.1% for stem. For patients with BMI > 30, accuracy of digital templating was 84.6% for cup and 69.2% for stem while that of analog templating was 75.0% for cup and 66.7% for stem. Digital templating outperformed analog templating in all the outcomes except femoral neck length. In addition, digital templating was significantly more accurate in predicting femoral offset. This study showed that digital templating has the potential to reduce errors in pre-operative planning for THA

Purpose. The positon of short stem is affected by the native anatomy of femoral neck and also by fixation mechanism dependent on design. As a consequence, it has been speculated that restoration of hip geometry might be limited in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using short stem. Therefore, the present study assessed the predictability of restoration of hip geometry using two different CCD-angled short stem engaging the lateral cortex. Materials and Methods. The 60 patients included 15 females and 45 males. The average age was 48.0 years with average BMI 24.2. Biomechanical parameters of hip geometry were analysed on postoperative calibrated radiographs in 30 consecutive primary unilateral THAs using short stem (Metha®, B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) with 120° CCD angle (group I) and 30 match controlled cases with 135° CCD angle (group II) and compared to those of the contralateral hip without deformity. The matching process was done before collecting the radiographic measurements by two blinded observer and was for sex, age ± 5 years, and BMI ± 7 units in that order. Results. Head length was short in 40%, 67%, medium in 37%, 23% and large in 23%, 10% of the patients in each group respectively with no significant difference in between group (p=0.11). The discrepancies of horizontal hip center of rotation (△HHCR) and the vertical hip center of rotation (△VHCR) compared to the contralateral side was similar in both groups (p=0.95, p= 0.11, respectively), which enabled to make a direct comparison of the femoral reconstruction. Compared to the contralateral side, discrepancies of limb length (△LLD) showed a borderline significant difference between two groups (avr.+0.7mm, +2.5mm respectively, p=0.04) with higher values for group of 135° CCD angle (more than 5mm of LLD in 27%). However, in group of 120° CCD angle, the discrepancies of horizontal femoral offset (△HFO) and abductor lever arm (△AbLA) (avr. +5.9 mm, +4.9mm respectively) revealed significantly increased compared with balanced value of group 135° CCD angle (+0.9mm, p <0.0001, +1.3mm, p=0.02, respectively) and about half of patients in group of 120° CCD angle revealed outside the 5mm difference target in either horizontal femoral offset (53% of patient) and abductor lever arm (50% of patient). Conclusion. With decreasing CCD-angle of short stem, restoration of limb length appears more predictable but, horizontal femoral offset and abductor lever arm increased with outside of a beneficial range. This tendency should be taken into consideration when choice the design of this kind of neck-preserving short stem as well as exact implantation technique

INTRODUCTION. Combining novel diverse population-based software with a clinically-demonstrated implant design is redefining total hip arthroplasty. This contemporary stem design utilized a large patient database of high-resolution CT bone scans in order to determine the appropriate femoral head centers and neck lengths to assist in the recreation of natural head offset, designed to restore biomechanics. There are limited studies evaluating how radiographic software utilizing reference template bone can reconstruct patient composition in a model. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the application of a modern analytics system utilizing 3D modeling technology in the development of a primary stem was successful in restoring patient biomechanics, specifically with regards to femoral offset (FO) and leg length discrepancy (LLD). METHODS. Two hundred fifty six patients in a non-randomized, post-market multicenter study across 7 sites received a primary cementless fit and fill stem. Full anteroposterior pelvis and Lauenstein cross-table lateral x-rays were collected preoperatively and at 6-weeks postoperative. Radiographic parameters including contralateral and operative FO and LLD were measured. Preoperative and postoperative FO and LLD of the operative hip were compared to the normal, native hip. Clinical outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), Short Form 12 (SF12), and EuroQol 5D Score (EQ-5D) were collected preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, and at 1 year. RESULTS. The mean age is 62 years old (range 32 – 75), 136 male and 120 female, BMI 29.7. The preoperative FO and LLD of the operative hip were 43.5 mm (±9.0 mm) and 3.0 mm (±6.5 mm) compared to the native contralateral hip, respectively. The postoperative FO and LLD were 46.4 mm (±8.7 mm) and 1.6 mm (±7.6 mm) compared to the native contralateral hip, respectively. The change in FO on the operative side was 3.0 mm (±7.2 mm) (p<0.0001) and the change in LLD from preoperative to 6-weeks postoperative was 1.6 mm (±8.4 mm) (p=0.0052) (Figure 1), demonstrating the ability of this stem design to recreate normal hip biomechanics in this study. The HHS increased considerably from a preoperative score of 55.9 to 78.4 at 6 weeks and 92.7 at 1 year. Clinically significant improvements were also seen at 1 year in the LEAS (+2.3), SF12 PCS (+16.3), and EQ-5D TTO (+0.26) and the EQ-5D VAS (+15.7). DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION. This study demonstrated that recreation of normal anatomic leg length and offset is possible by utilizing a modern fit and fill stem that was designed by employing an advanced anthropomorphic database of CT scans. We hypothesize that when surgeons utilize this current fit and fill stem design, it will allow them to accurately recreate a patient's natural FO and leg length, assisting in the restoration of patient biomechanics. Summary Sentence. In this study, modern design methods of a press-fit stem using 3D modeling tools recreated natural femoral offset and leg length, assisting in the restoration of patient biomechanics