This study measured the three bony axes usually used for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty and compared the accuracy and repeatability of different measurement techniques. Fresh cadaveric limbs (n=6) were used. Three observers (student, trainee and consultant) identified the posterior condylar (PCA), anteroposterior (AP) and the transepicondylar (TEA) axes, using a computer navigation system to record measurements. The AP axis was measured before and after being identified with an ink line. The TEA was measured by palpation of the epicondyles both before and after an incision was made in the medial and lateral gutters at the level of the epicondyles, allowing the index finger to be passed behind the gutters. In addition the true TEA was identified after dissection of all the soft tissues. Each measurement was repeated three times. For all axes and each observer the repeatability coefficient was calculated. The identification of the PCA was the most reliable (repeatability coefficient: 1.1°) followed by the AP after drawing the ink line (4.5°) then the AP before (5.7°) and lastly the TEA (12.3°) which showed no improvement with the incisions (13.0°). In general the inter-observer variability for each axis was small (average 3.3°, range 0.4° to 6°), being best for the consultant and worst for the student. In comparison to the true TEA, the recorded TEA and AP axis averaged within 1.5° whilst the PCA was consistently 2.8° or more internally rotated. This study echoed previous studies in demonstrating that palpating the PCA intra-operatively is highly precise but was prone to errors in representing the true TEA if there was asymmetrical condylar erosion. The TEA was highly variable irrespective of observer ability and experience. The line perpendicular line to the AP axis most closely paralleled the true TEA when measured after being identified with an ink line

Total knee arthroplasty is an established and successful operation. In up to 13% of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty continue to complain of pain. Recently computerised tomography (CT) has been used to assess the rotational profile of both the tibial and femoral components in painful total knee arthroplasty. We reviewed 56 painful total knee replacements and compared these to 56 matched patients with pain free total knee replacements. Patients with infection, aseptic loosening, revision arthroplasties and gross coronal malalignment were excluded. Datum gathered from case notes and radiographs using a prospective orthopaedic database to identify patients. The age, sex, preoperative and postoperative Oxford scores, visual analogue scores and treatments recorded. The CT information recorded was limb alignment, tibial component rotation, femoral component rotation and combined rotation. The two cohorts of patients had similar demographics. The mean limb alignments were 1.7 degrees varus and 0.01 degrees valgus in the painful and control groups respectively. A significant difference in tibial component rotation was identified between the groups with 3.2 degrees of internal rotation in the painful group compared to 0.5 degrees of external rotation in the control group (p=0.001). A significant difference in femoral component rotation was identified between the groups with 3.8 degrees of internal rotation in the painful group compared to 1.1 degrees of external rotation in the control group (p=0.001). A significant difference in the combined component rotation was identified between the groups with 6.8 degrees of internal rotation in the painful group compared to 1.7 degrees of external rotation in the control group (p=0.001). We have identified significant internal rotation in a patient cohort with painful total knee arthroplasty when compared to a control group with internal rotation of the tibial component, femoral component and combined rotation. This is the largest comparison series currently in the literature

Component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reason for early failure and revision. Assessment of possible component malrotation using computed tomography (CT) might be useful when other differentials have been excluded. The aims of our study were to determine the proportion of symptomatic patients with component malrotation on CT, and review the subsequent management of such patients. A retrospective review of case notes was performed locally for all patients who had a CT scan for a painful TKA. Measurements of the femoral and tibial component rotations were done according to the standard Berger protocol, giving net degrees of either external rotation (ER) or internal rotation (IR). Any subsequent surgery was noted, and patients were followed up as per local practice. Between 2007 and April 2012, 69 knees in 68 patients had CT scans. There were 25 males and 43 females, and mean age at primary surgery was 65.03 years. The mean femoral component rotation for all knees was 0.1° ER (range 7.0° ER – 6.7° IR), and the mean tibial component rotation for all knees was 19.1° IR (6.6° ER – 37.0° IR). No statistically significant difference was found comparing the mean femoral and tibial component rotations between patients with and without further surgery. Further surgery was performed on 39 (56.5%) knees. Overall, there were ten cases (14.5%) of isolated femoral malrotation, 26 tibial malrotation (37.7%), and two cases (2.9%) had malrotation of both components. Out of these 38 cases, secondary surgery was performed in 22 knees (57.9%), of which a satisfactory outcome was achieved in fifteen cases (68.1%). It is impossible to establish component malrotation as the only cause of pain following TKA, however, our study does show that the Berger protocol has its uses when other causes have been excluded

Summary. Computer assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to improve prosthetic alignment in coronal and sagittal plane. In this systematic review, no evidence is found that CAS also improves axial component orientation when used during TKA. Introduction. Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a safe and cost-effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Correct prosthesis alignment is essential, since malpositioning of the prosthesis leads to worse functional outcome and increased wear, which compromises survival of the prosthesis. Computer assisted surgery (CAS) has been developed to enhance prosthesis alignment during TKA. CAS significantly improves postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment compared to conventional TKA. However, the influence of CAS on rotational alignment is a matter of debate. Therefore purpose of this review is to assess published evidence on the influence of CAS during TKA on postoperative rotational alignment. Patients and Methods. This review was performed according to the PRISMA Statement. An electronic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Medline and Embase on studies published between 1991 and April 2013. Studies were included when rotational alignment following imageless CAS-TKA was compared to rotational alignment following conventional TKA. At least one of the following outcome measures had to be assessed: 1) rotational alignment of the femoral component, 2) rotational alignment of the tibial component, 3) tibiofemoral mismatch, 4) the amount of rotational outliers of the femoral component, 5) the amount of rotational outliers of the tibial component. Study selection was performed in two stages and data extraction and methodological quality assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for continuous variables. The SMDs were interpreted according to Cohen: an SMD of 0.2–0.4 was considered a small effect; 0.5–0.7 was considered moderate; and ≥ 0.8 was considered a large effect. For the comparison of the amount of outliers for femoral and tibial component rotation, the Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI was calculated. The OR represents the odds of outliers occurring in the CAS group compared with the conventional group. An OR of < 1 favors the CAS group. The OR is considered statistically significant when the 95% CI does not include the value of 1. Results. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. One study was considered of high, 15 studies of medium and one study of low methodological quality. SMD for rotation of the femoral component was −0.07 (−0.19–0.04). For rotation of the tibial component, the SMD was 0.11 (−0.01–0.24). Regarding tibiofemoral mismatch, the SMD was −0.27 (−0.57–0.02). For femoral outliers, the OR was 1.05 (0.78–1.43) and for tibial outliers the OR was 1.12 (0.86–1.47). Discussion / Conclusion. Results of this review show no evidence that CAS-TKA leads to better rotational alignment of the femoral or tibial component or tibiofemoral mismatch. Also no evidence was found that CAS results in a decrease of the amount of outliers regarding femoral or tibial component orientation. However, these conclusions have to be interpreted with caution. The number of included studies was low and strong heterogeneity existed between the studies. Of the 17 included studies, only one study was considered of high methodological quality. Moreover, different methods for assessing tibial component rotation have been used in the studies included