Extra-articular deformity may be present in patients requiring TKA. Underlying causes include trauma, metabolic bone disease, congenital deformity, or prior osteotomy. Patients with intra-articular deformity have a combination of intra-articular bone loss and concomitant ligament contraction which can be managed in the standard fashion. In these cases establishing appropriate limb alignment and management of bone loss coincide well with the standard ligament balancing employed to provide a stable knee. However, if extra-articular deformity is not corrected extra-articularly, it must be corrected by a compensatory distal femoral or proximal tibial resection to reproduce appropriate limb alignment. Complex instabilities may result from this type of wedge resection because it occurs between the proximal and distal attachments of the collateral ligaments and so produces asymmetrical ligament length alterations. Femoral compensatory wedge resection for extra-articular deformity produces extension instability without affecting the flexion gap and so femoral deformities are POTENTIALLY more difficult to correct than tibial deformities where the compensatory tibial cut influences flexion AND extension equally. Lack of access to the intramedullary canal (as well as increased complexity of producing appropriately placed bone cuts) may be managed with computer guidance or patient specific instruments. The closer a deformity is to the knee, the greater its importance and the effect on the surgical correction. This is a directly proportional relationship, so that as the apex of the deformity moves from juxta-articular to more distant, the amount of corrective wedge needed to re-align the limb decreases proportionally. Rotatory deformities most commonly effect extensor mechanism tracking. The effect is similar to any other deformity in that proximity to the knee and increases the likelihood that it will have a significant local effect. In general, these deformities may be clinically, and radiographically more subtle and so must be searched for. They should be managed by restoring normal rotational parameters of the bone or by appropriate compensation of component rotation relative to the bone. As the need for prosthetic constraint increases due to ligament imbalance or deficiency, intramedullary stems may be required. Their use may be compromised by the presence of the deformity. The younger the patient and the more severe the deformity the more likely I am to treat the deformity by correction at the site of the deformity rather than compensating with abnormal bone resections. The older the patient and the milder the deformity (or the amount of correction required) the more intra-articular correction +/− increased TKA constraint is feasible

Extra-articular deformity may be present in patients requiring TKA. Underlying causes include trauma, metabolic bone disease, congenital deformity, or prior osteotomy. Patients with intra-articular deformity can have a combination of intra-articular bone loss and concomitant ligament contraction which can be managed in the standard fashion. In these cases establishing appropriate limb alignment and management of bone loss coincide well with the standard ligament balancing employed to provide a stable knee. However, if extra-articular deformity is not corrected extra-articularly, it must be corrected by a compensatory distal femoral or proximal tibial resection to reproduce appropriate limb alignment. Complex instabilities may result from this type of wedge resection because it occurs between the proximal and distal attachments of the collateral ligaments and so produces asymmetrical ligament length alterations. Femoral compensatory wedge resection for extra-articular deformity produces extension instability without affecting the flexion gap and so femoral deformities are POTENTIALLY more difficult to correct than tibial deformities where the compensatory tibial cut influences flexion AND extension equally. Lack of access to the intramedullary canal (as well as increased complexity of producing appropriately placed bone cuts) may be managed with computer guidance or patient specific instruments. The closer a deformity is to the knee, the greater its importance and the effect on the surgical correction. This is a directly proportional relationship, so that as the apex of the deformity moves from juxta-articular to more distant, the amount of corrective wedge needed to re-align the limb decreases proportionally. Rotatory deformities are complex and most commonly effect extensor mechanism tracking. In general the effect is similar to any other deformity in that proximity to the knee increases the likelihood that it will have a significant local effect. In general, these deformities are clinically, and radiographically more subtle and so must be searched for. They should be managed by an attempt to restore normal rotational parameters of the bone itself or appropriate compensation of component rotation in relation to the bone. As prosthetic constraint increases one may need to use intramedullary stems. Their use may be compromised by the deformity. Finally, the younger the patient and the more severe the deformity the more likely I am to treat the deformity by correction at the site of the deformity rather than compensating with abnormal bone resections. The older the patient and the milder the deformity (or the amount of wedge correction required) the more likely I am to manage the deformity with intra-articular correction and increased TKA constraint

Introduction. Restoration of mechanical axis is one of the main aims during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. Treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee with extra-articular deformity either in femur or in tibia poses a technical challenge in achieving this aim. Insufficient correction of axis is associated with poor clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Extra-articular deformity can either be addressed with compensatory intra-articular bone resection at the time of TKA or correctional osteotomy prior to or at the time of TKA. Patients & Methods & Results. We present our experience of treating 7 patients with knee arthritis (9 knees) and significant extra-articular deformity. Two patients had OA knee with severe valgus deformity in tibia from recurrent stress fractures. One was treated with one-stage corrective osteotomy and long stem modular TKA. The other had deformity correction with two level tibial osteotomy with intramedullary nail and modular long stem TKA later. Both required tibial tubercle osteotomy during TKA. Two patients with bilateral OA knees and significant varus deformity had sequential deformity correction with Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) followed by TKA on one side and a single stage intra-articular correction during TKA on the other. Three patients with knee OA and associated deformity (femoral - two pt., tibia one pt.) had symptom resolution with just correction of malaligment with Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) and did not require TKA. Conclusion. Complex extra-articular femoral or tibial deformities may require proper limb realignment prior to TKA. Our series supports all three approaches to correcting significant extra-articular deformity with knee OA. Each case should be considered individually and planned accordingly

Total knee arthroplasty becomes more challenging when knee arthritis is associated with an extra-articular deformity of the femur or tibia. We evaluated the outcome of navigated total knee arthroplasty in a large series of arthritic knees with extra-articular deformity. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 950 patients who had undergone navigated TKA between January 2005 and February 2008. There were 40 extra-articular deformities in 34 patients, with bilateral involvement in 6 patients which were included in the study. Twenty-two limbs had deformity in the femur and the tibia had deformity in 18 limbs. There were 24 females and 10 males with a mean age of 63.1 years (range, 46–80 years). The etiologies included malunited fractures (13 patients), stress fractures (4 patients), post high tibial osteotomy (3 patients), and excessive coronal bowing (14 patients). The mean femoral extra-articular deformity in the coronal plane was 9.3° varus (range, 24° varus to 2.8° varus) and the mean tibial extra-articular deformity in the coronal plane was 6.3° varus (range, 20° varus to 8.5° valgus). Three limbs underwent simultaneous corrective osteotomy and the rest were treated with intra-articular correction during computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. The limb alignment changed from a mean of 166.7° preoperatively to 179.1° postoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 26.4 months, the Knee Society knee score improved from a mean pre-operative score of 49.7 points to 90.4 points postoperatively; function score improved from 47.3 points to 84.9 points. The results of our study indicate that computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is a useful alternative to conventional total knee arthroplasty for knee arthritis with extraarticular deformity where accurate restoration of limb alignment may be challenging due to the presence of a deformed tibia or femur or in the presence of hardware

Introduction. Arthritic knees requiring total knee replacement may present with additional deformities located along the femur or tibia away from the articular region. These deformities may be congenital, developmental, associated with metabolic bone disease, or acquired as a result of malunited fractures or previous advocated for arthritic knee with ipsilateral extra-articular deformity. Methods. We undertook retrospective study to evaluate the results of total knee arthroplasty in arthritic knee with extra-articular deformity in 26 knees (24 patients). Sixteen deformities were in tibia and ten deformities were in femur. All patients underwent total knee arthroplasty with intraarticular bone resection and soft tissue balancing. Results. Average period of follow up was 30 months. Average preoperative arc of motion was 57.5 degrees, which improved to 102.5 degrees. The average preoperative knee society knee score 23.5 points, which improved to an average of 91.3 points at the time of last follow up. The average functional score was 27.0 points, which improved to average of 88.0 points. There were no complications such as infection, ligament instability or component loosening. Conclusion. Intra-articular bone resection is an effective procedure for management of arthritic knees with extra-articular deformity

Deformity can be associated with significant bone loss, ligament laxity, soft-tissue contractures, distortion of long bone morphology, and extra-articular deformity. Correction of varus, valgus, or flexion deformity requires soft tissue releases in conjunction with bone cuts perpendicular to the long axes of the femur and tibia. Cruciate-retaining or -substituting implants can be used based on surgeon preference if the ligaments are well balanced. However, in presence of severe deformity, additional measures may be warranted to achieve alignment and balance. TKA then becomes a more challenging proposition and may require the surgeon to perform extensive releases, adjunct osteotomies and deploy more constrained implants. Merely enhancing constraint in the implant, however, without attending to releases and extra-articular correction may not suffice. Pre-operative planning, i.e., whether intra-articular correction alone will suffice or extra-articular correction is required, will be highlighted. Surgical principles and methods of performing large releases, reduction osteotomy, lateral epicondylar sliding osteotomy, sliding medial condylar osteotomy, and closed wedge diaphyseal/metaphyseal osteotomy concomitantly with TKA will be illustrated with examples. Results of a large series of TKA with extra-articular deformity resulting from coronal bowing of femoral or tibial diaphysis, malunited fractures, prior osteotomies, and stress fractures will be presented. The techniques reported can successfully restore alignment, pain-free motion, and stability without necessarily using more constrained implants

Summary Statement. We present a simple and useful geometrical equation system to carry out the pre-operative planning and intra-operative assessments for total knee arthroplasty. These methods are extremely helpful in severely deformed lower limbs. Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is a highly successful surgery for most of the patients with knee osteoarthritis. With commercial instruments and jigs, most surgeons can correct the deformity and provided satisfactory results. However, in cases with severe extra-articular deformity, the instruments may mislead surgeons in making judgment of the true mechanical axis. We developed a geometrical equation system for pre-operative planning and intra-operative measurement to perform correct bony cuts and achieve good post-operative axis. Patients & Methods. From 2008 to 2012, twenty-four patients with severe extra-articular deformities of low limbs underwent total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis. The deformities included malunion of femoral or tibial shafts with angulation, non-union of femoral supracondylar fractures, failed high tibia osteotomies, severe bowing of femurs, and other post-traumatic sequelae. The intra-medullary or extra-medullary guide devices were not possible to provide correct axis in these cases. For pre-operative planning, we analyzed the deformities on triple-film scanography and standing anterior-posterior and lateral X-ray films. The angles needed to be corrected in coronal and sagittal planes were measured. A geometrical equation system was applied to calculate the thickness of the proximal tibia cut and distal femoral cut. If the flexion contracture was presented, the degree of necessary elevation of joint line was also calculated. Intra-operatively, the degree of rotation of anterior and posterior femoral cuts was assessed after proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. The sizes of prosthesis were judged according to the balance between flexion and extension gaps. A 3-in-1 jig was used for chamfering of the femur. After fine-tuning of bony cuts and balancing of soft tissue, the prostheses were cemented. The conventional intra-medullary and extra-medullary guiding devices were not used during the whole procedure. Results. All of the patients achieved satisfactory results in the aspect of pain relief and functional outcomes. All patients had good post-operative axis in coronal plane (varus or valgus deformity < 3 degrees). Twenty-two patients (92%) achieved good sagittal alignments (deformity < 3 degrees). The results were compatible with those in the patient population without those severe deformities. There was no major complication among these patients. Discussion/Conclusion. In this series, we present a simple and useful geometrical equation system to carry out the pre-operative planning and intra-operative assessments for total knee arthroplasty. These methods are extremely helpful in severely deformed lower limbs. Optimal post-operative alignments were achieved in this series and no major complication was found

Aims

The impact of a diaphyseal femoral deformity on knee alignment varies according to its severity and localization. The aims of this study were to determine a method of assessing the impact of diaphyseal femoral deformities on knee alignment for the varus knee, and to evaluate the reliability and the reproducibility of this method in a large cohort of osteoarthritic patients.

The treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and associated extra-articular deformity of the leg is challenging. Current teaching recognises two possible approaches: (1) a total knee replacement (TKR) with intra-articular bone resections to correct the malalignment or (2) an extra-articular osteotomy to correct the malalignment together with a TKR (either simultaneously or staged). However, a number of these patients only have unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and, in the absence of an extra-articular deformity would be ideal candidates for joint preserving surgery such as unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) given its superior functional outcome and lower cost relative to a TKR [1). We report four cases of medial unicondylar knee replacement, with a simultaneous extra-articular osteotomy to correct deformity, using novel 3D printed patient-specific guides (Embody, UK) (see Figure 1). The procedure was successful in all four patients, and there were no complications. A mean increase in the Oxford knee score of 9.5, and in the EQ5D VAS of 15 was observed. To our knowledge this is the first report of combined osteotomy and unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of extra-articular deformity and knee osteoarthritis. This technically challenging procedure is made possible by a novel 3D printed patient-specific guide which controls osteotomy position, degree of deformity correction (multi-plane if required), and orientates the saw-cuts for the unicompartmental prosthesis according to the corrected leg alignment. Using 3D printed surgical guides to perform operations not previously possible represents a paradigm shift in knee surgery. We suggest that this joint preserving approach should be considered the preferred treatment option for suitable patients

Aims. The aims of this retrospective study were to determine the incidence of extra-articular deformities (EADs), and determine their effect on postoperative alignment in knees undergoing mobile-bearing, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Patients and Methods. Limb mechanical alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal bowing of the femoral shaft and proximal tibia vara or medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on standing, full-length hip-to-ankle radiographs of 162 patients who underwent 200 mobile-bearing, medial UKAs. Results. Incidence of EAD was 7.5% for coronal femoral bowing of >5°, 67% for proximal tibia vara of >3° (MPTA<87°) and 24.5% for proximal tibia vara of >6° (MPTA<84°). Mean postoperative HKA angle achieved in knees with femoral bowing ≤5° was significantly greater when compared to knees with femoral bowing >5° (p=0.04); in knees with proximal tibia vara ≤3° was significantly greater when compared to knees with proximal tibia vara >3° (p=0.0001) and when compared to knees with proximal tibia vara >6° (p=0.0001). Conclusion. Extra-articular deformities are frequently seen in patients undergoing mobile-bearing medial UKAs, especially in knees with varus deformity>10°. Presence of an EAD significantly affects postoperative mechanical limb alignment achieved when compared to limbs without EAD and may increase the risk of limbs being placed in varus>3° postoperatively. Clinical Relevance. Since the presence of an EAD, especially in knees with varus deformity>10°, may increase the risk of limbs being placed in varus>3° postoperatively and may affect long-term clinical and implant survival outcomes, UKR in such knees should be performed with caution

There is enough evidence to show that navigation improves precision of component placement and consistent and accurate restoration of limb alignment, allowing the surgeon to achieve the desired neutral or kinematic alignment. Computer-assisted TKA provides excellent information regarding gap equality and symmetry throughout the knee range of motion. Accurate soft-tissue balancing is facilitated by CAS. It allows precise, quantitative soft tissue release for deformities, especially in knees with severe flexion contractures and severe rigid varus and valgus deformities. It allows accurate restoration of joint line, and posterior femoral offset. Knee arthritis with complex extra-articular deformities and in-situ hardware can be tackled appropriately using computer navigation where conventional techniques may be inadequate. It also allows intra-articular correction for extra-articular deformities due to malunions and facilitates extra-articular correction in cases with severe extra-articular tibial deformities. In obese patients, where the alignment of the limb is difficult to assess, computer navigation improves accuracy and reduces the number of outliers. The ability to quantify the precise amount of bone cuts and soft tissue releases needed to equalise gaps and restore alignment, reduced blood loss, and reduced incidence of systemic emboli improves the safety of the procedure and hastens functional recovery of the patient. Recent evidence shows that the rate of revision especially in younger patients is reduced with navigation

Limb deformity is common in patients presenting for knee arthroplasty, either related to asymmetrical wear patterns from the underlying arthritic process (intra-articular malalignment) or less often major extra-articular deformity due to prior fracture malunion, childhood physical injury, old osteotomy, or developmental or metabolic disorders such as Blount's disease or hypophosphatemic rickets. Angular deformity that is above the epicondyles or below the fibular neck may not be easily correctable by adjusted bone cuts as the amount of bone resection may make soft tissue balancing impossible or may disrupt completely the collateral ligament attachments. Development of a treatment plan begins with careful assessment of the malalignment which may be mainly coronal, sagittal, rotational or some combination. Translation can also complicate the reconstruction as this has effects directly on location of the mechanical axis. Most intra-articular deformities are due to the arthritic process alone, but may occasionally be the result of intra-articular fracture, periarticular osteotomy or from prior revision surgery effects. While intra-articular deformity can almost always be managed with adjusted bone cuts it is important to have available revision type implants to enhance fixation (stems) or increase constraint when ligament balancing or ligament laxity is a problem. Extra-articular deformities may be correctable with adjusted bone cuts and altered implant positioning when the deformity is smaller, or located a longer distance from the joint. The effect of a deformity is proportional to its distance from the joint. The closer the deformity is to the joint, the greater the impact the same degree angular deformity will have. In general deformities in the plane of knee are better tolerated than sagittal plane (varus/valgus) deformity. Careful pre-operative planning is required for cases with significant extra-articular deformity with a focus on location and plane of the apex of the deformity, identification of the mechanical axis location relative to the deformed limb, distance of the deformity from the joint, and determination of the intra-articular effect on bone cuts and implant position absent osteotomy. In the course of pre-operative planning, osteotomy is suggested when there is inability to correct the mechanical axis to neutral without excessive bone cuts which compromise ligament or patellar tendon attachment sites, or alternatively when adequate adjustment of cuts will likely lead to excessive joint line obliquity which can compromise ability to balance the soft tissues. When chosen, adjunctive osteotomy can be done in one-stage at the time of TKA or the procedures can be done separately in two stages. When simultaneous with TKA, osteotomy fixation options include long stems added to the femoral (or tibial) component for intramedullary fixation, adjunctive plate and screw fixation, and antegrade (usually locked) nailing for some femoral osteotomies. Choice of fixation method is often influenced by specific deformity size location, bone quality and amount, and surgeon preference. Surgical navigation, or intra-operative x-ray imaging methods (or both) have both been used to facilitate accurate correction of deformity in these complex cases. When faced with major deformity of the femur or tibia, with careful planning combined osteotomy and TKA can result in excellent outcomes and durable implant fixation with less constraint, less bone loss, and better joint kinematics than is possible with modified TKA alone

Intra-articular resection of bone with soft-tissue balancing and total knee replacement (TKR) has been described for the treatment of patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee associated with an ipsilateral malunited femoral fracture. However, the extent to which deformity in the sagittal plane can be corrected has not been addressed. We treated 12 patients with severe arthritis of the knee and an extra-articular malunion of the femur by TKR with intra-articular resection of bone and soft-tissue balancing. The femora had a mean varus deformity of 16° (8° to 23°) in the coronal plane. There were seven recurvatum deformities with a mean angulation of 11° (6° to 15°) and five antecurvatum deformities with a mean angulation of 12° (6° to 15°). The mean follow-up was 93 months (30 to 155). The median Knee Society knee and function scores improved from 18.7 (0 to 49) and 24.5 (10 to 50) points pre-operatively to 93 (83 to 100) and 90 (70 to 100) points at the time of the last follow-up, respectively. The mean mechanical axis of the knee improved from 22.6° of varus (15° to 27° pre-operatively to 1.5° of varus (3° of varus to 2° of valgus) at the last follow-up. The recurvatum deformities improved from a mean of 11° (6° to 15°) pre-operatively to 3° (0° to 6°) at the last follow-up. The antecurvatum deformities in the sagittal plane improved from a mean of 12° (6° to 16°) pre-operatively to 4.4° (0° to 8°) at the last follow-up. Apart from varus deformities, TKR with intra-articular bone resection effectively corrected the extra-articular deformity of the femur in the presence of antecurvatum of up to 16° and recurvatum of up to 15°

Varus deformity encompasses a wide spectrum of pathology and merits individualised treatment. In most knees there is loss of articular cartilage or bone medially; this is associated with contractures of posteromedial structures of varying rigidity. In addition, there may be significant elongation of lateral ligamentous structures, and associated extra-articular femoral or tibial bowing or angulation. The principles of correction of varus include (i) a thorough clinical and radiological assessment of the limb before surgery and examination under anesthesia, (ii) appropriate bone cuts to correctly orient prostheses and restore normal alignment of the limb, (iii) equalising medial and lateral balance in flexion and extension by soft tissue releases and concomitant bony procedures and (iv) addressing associated bony defects and extra-articular deformity. Examples of each of these situations will be shown along with the technique deployed. Results of conventional TKA in treating 173 knees with varus deformity exceeding 20o will be presented. Our technique of selective posteromedial release, reduction osteotomy of posteromedial tibial flare, sliding medial condylar osteotomy and bone grafting of medial defects, with preservation of medial collateral ligament integrity will be shown. The method of correcting extra-articular deformity will be depicted. With these techniques, mean tibiofemoral angle of 22.7 degrees varus pre-operatively (range 15–62) was corrected to 5.3 degrees valgus (range 2–9) post-operatively. 86% knees were in 4–10 degrees valgus post-operatively. Recent experience with CAS in treating over 200 patients with deformity exceeding 20 degrees will be presented along with the risk factors leading to malalignment. Correction of severe varus deformity by the techniques reported can successfully restore alignment, painfree motion, and stability without the use of highly constrained implants

The correct positioning of implant components in total knee replacement (TKR) is important for a successful long-term outcome. In order to address the problems inherent with conventional alignment methods, several computer-assisted navigation systems (CAS) have been developed. Despite numerous reports of clinical outcomes and system reliability, there is a lack of studies independently evaluating the precision and accuracy of such systems. We report on the design and development of a method and device to evaluate the accuracy of such a computer-assisted navigation system in two situations; 1) Normal or near-normal lower limb mechanical axis, and 2)Simulated femoral and/or tibial extra-articular deformity in either varus/valgus (x), internal/external rotation (y) or flexion/extension (z) planes. The system assessed was the Ci Knee-CAS navigation system (BrainLab/De Puy). This image-free system requires the registration of specific anatomical points to identify the mechanical axis of the lower limb and therefore provide information on resection level and alignment. In order to precisely measure and accurately reproduce these points we constructed a phantom device along anatomical guidelines, with lockable joints located at the mid-shaft of both femur and tibia. We then identified geometric CAS data; 1) Tibial resection height, and 2) Tibial resection plane, and using specially written software compared this against validated co-ordinate measurements independently obtained by a FaroArm co-ordinate measurement system (FARO Technologies, USA). This enabled data from the navigation system to be directly compared against highly accurate reference measurements. Accuracy of the system was then assessed with both normal mechanical alignment of the lower limbs and simulated extra-articular deformity

Computer navigation has been advocated as a means to improve limb and component alignment and reduce the number of outliers after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine the alignment outcomes of 1500 consecutive computer-assisted TKAs performed by a single surgeon, using the same implant, with a minimum 1 year follow-up, and to analyze the outliers. Based on radiographic analysis, 112 limbs (7.5%) in 109 patients with mechanical axis malalignment of > 3° were identified and analyzed. The indication for TKA was osteoarthritis in 107 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in 2 patients. Fifty-eight patients (53%) had undergone simultaneous bilateral TKA and 13 patients (12%) had a BMI >30. Preoperative varus deformity was seen in 100 limbs and valgus deformity in 12 limbs. Thirty limbs (27%) had an extra-articular deformity (2 post HTO limbs, 3 malunited fractures, 1 stress fracture, 21 severe femoral bowing and 3 tibial bowing) and 21 limbs (19%) had severe lateral laxity or subluxation. Thirty-eight limbs (34%) had a preoperative deformity of =10° and 24 limbs (21.5%) had varus or valgus deformity of >20°. Postoperatively, 11 limbs were malaligned at ±3°, 74 limbs at ±4°, 22 limbs at ±5°, 2 limbs at ±6°, and 2 limbs at ±7°. Coronal plane malalignment of > ±3° of the femoral component was seen in 28 limbs, tibial component in 32 limbs, and both femoral and tibial components in 13 limbs. Twenty-six limbs with preoperative varus deformity had a postoperative valgus alignment of >183° and 3 limbs with valgus deformity had a postoperative varus alignment of <177°. The incidence of outliers for postoperative limb alignment was low at 7.5% with the tibial component showing a higher incidence of coronal malalignment. Malalignment may be more common in cases of simultaneous bilateral procedures, preoperative limb alignment of =10°, limbs with extra-articular deformities and severe lateral instability. There was a tendency towards over-correction of the hip-knee-ankle axis in both varus- and valgus-deformed knees. Further detailed statistical analysis of the data will be presented. This is the largest single-surgeon series of consecutive navigated TKAs and consequently the largest analysis of outliers that highlights which knees are likely to fall outside the +3 degrees of acceptable alignment and which therefore behoove the surgeon to exercise greater caution

The patho-anatomy of a valgus knee could be divide into two categories as bony hypolasia and/or deficiency and soft tissue imbalance. The soft tissue in the lateral side of the knee (Including illio-tial band, lateral collateral ligament, poplitious tendon, posterior-lateral ligament, and hamstrings etc) is contracted with or without medial soft tissue attenuation. There are many reasons explain why dealing with a valgus knee is much more difficult than dealing with a varus knee. The most important three factors are:. There is much less room or space to release a LCL,. The MCL could be attenuated,. A fixed valgus deformity is always associated with bone deficiency or hypoplasia. However, it is arbitrary, and in many times, it is wrong to take it for granted that a valgus knee is always associated with a tight LCL. In this article, the author mainly introduce the rationale and clinical application of a LCL tension based classification and treatment algorithm of a valgus knee. The details of how to judge if the LCL is tight, loose or normally tensioned; Is the valgus knee purely or associated with an extra-articular deformity will also be discussed. JST Classification of a Valgus Knee. Femoral deformity. Type F1 Valgus in Extension only. F1a Intra-articular deformity, LCL is loose when the knee extends, while LCL maintains normal tension when the knee flexes. F1b Extra-articular deformity which is close to knee joint(supra-condylar deformity), LCL remains normal length and tension through all the range of motion. Type F2 Valgus in both extension and flexion. Intra-articular deformity, LCL is tight through all the range of motion, hypoplasia or bone deficiency in both distal and posterior lateral femoral condyle. Tibial deformity. Type T1 Intra-articular deformity, lateral tibial plateau deficiency. Type T2 Extra-articular deformity, tibial metaphyseal orshaft deformity. Treatment algorithm of a valgus knee. Type F1a. This type valgus knee is the easiest to deal with. The LCL length is well maintained, and LCL is loose when knee extends. What is tight and restrains the deformity as a fixed valgus one is: ITB and posterior-lateral capsule instead of LCL and poplitous tendon. The deformity is corrected simply by releasing ITB & posterior-lateral capsule and bony graft or using a metal block to augment the deficient or hypoplastic lateral distal femoral condyle. At the same time, the loose LCL is properly tensioned by bone graft of metal augmentation. Since both ITB & posterior capsule are secondary stabilizers, the LCL and poplitous tendon is properly tensioned, the knee is pretty stable. Type F1b. This type of valgus deformity actually comes from juxta supera-condylar area, the deformity is very close to the joint, or in other words, close to the collateral ligament frame, this type deformity is also regard as a type of valgus knee. According to severity of the deformity, patient’s age, and surgeon’s preference, the following methods are commonly used. Method A: lateral condyle distal sliding osteotomy The essence of a sliding osteotomy is converting a F1b deformity into a F1a deformity. By distally sliding osteotomy, the LCL becomes loose when the knee extends, and the valgus deformity is shifted into the collateral ligament frame. Method B: Soft tissue releasing + constrained total knee The LCL of a F1b valgus knee is normal tensioned with normal length, over releasing lateral soft tissue will lead to imbalanced flexion gap, in this meaning, it may not possible to balance a F1b valgus knee properly in both flexion and extension. In such a knee, if the patient is old and is not going to lead an active life, a constrained prosthesis such as CCK or TC III can be used. Method C: One stage or two stage supera-condylar osteotomy+TKA. Since a F1b valgus knee is actually a normal knee combined with a supera-condylar deformity, it is understandable to correct deformity by an supera-condylar osteotomy. The osteotomy can be done in one stage or two stage style. Theoretically, a supera-condylar osteotomy is done in the most deformed region, and is done within cancellous bone, bone union can be predictably expected. But if a total knee and osteotomy is performed in one stage, the operator could encounter the following difficulties:. Conventional instruments can not guarantee correct bone cut because a supera-condylar deformity deviates intramedullary guiding rod;. the canal in distal femoral metaphyseal part is quite expended, it is difficult to achieve solid fixation either by a stem extension or retrograde intramedullary nailing. Total knee replacement, supera-condylar osteotomy and intramedullary could severely damage blood supply to osteotomy line leading to nonunion. The author prefer a two stage TKA and osteotomy for a F1b valgus knee. In one stage TKA and osteotomy, the author will use frontal epicondyle axis instead of intra-medullary rod to guide distal femoral cut. TypeF2. This type knee is consistently valgus no matter the knee extends of flexes, indicating both distal distal and posterior part of lateral femoral condyle is deficient of dysplastic and LCL is contracted. Lateral soft tissue, including LCL and some times popolitous tendon, is inevitable in managing type F2 valgus knee. If soft tissue releasing alone can’t balance medial and lateral part of the knee, a bidirectional sliding osteotomy can be done to shift proximal insertion of LCL both distally and posteriorly, releasing the LCL. Type T deformity. Type T deformity is sparse, Type T1 is typically seen in a rheumatoid arthritis, and Type T2 is usually iatrogenic(over corrected high tibia osteotomy) or after malunion of a tibia metapyseal or proximal shaft fracture. It is possible try to augament the lateral tibial plateau deficiency and release the lateral soft tissue for a Type T1 valgus knee. But for a Type T2 knee, a correctional osteotomy concomitant to a total knee is usually needed

The extent of soft-tissue release and the exact structures that need to be released to correct deformity and balance the knee has been a controversial subject in primary total knee arthroplasty. Asian patients often present late and consequently may have profound deformities due to significant bone loss and contractures on the concave side, and stretching of the collateral ligament on the convex side. Extra-articular deformities may aggravate the situation further and make correction of these deformities and restoration of ‘balance’ more arduous. These considerations do not apply if a hinged prosthesis is used, as may be warranted in an elderly, low-demand patient. However, in active, younger patients, it may be best to avoid use of excess constraint by balancing the soft-tissues and using the least constrained implant. Releasing collateral ligaments during TKA has unintended consequences such as the creation of significant mediolateral instability and a flexion gap which exceeds the extension gap; both of these may require a constrained prosthesis to achieve stability. We will show that soft-tissue balance can be achieved even in cases of severe varus, valgus, flexion and hyperextension deformities without collateral ligament release. The steps are: 1) Determining pre-operatively whether deformity is predominantly intra-articular or extra-articular, 2) Individualizing the valgus resection angle and bony resection depth, 3) Meticulous removal of osteophytes, 4) Reduction osteotomy, posteromedial capsule resection, sliding medial or lateral condylar osteotomy, extra-articular corrective osteotomy, 5) Compensating for bone loss, 6)Only rarely deploying a more constrained device. Case examples will be presented to illustrate the entire spectrum of varus deformities

Soft-tissue release plays an integral part in primary total knee arthroplasty by ‘balancing’ the knee. Asian patients often present late and consequently may have large deformities due to significant bone loss and contractures medially, and stretching of the lateral collateral ligament. Extra-articular deformities may aggravate the situation further and make correction of these deformities more arduous. Several techniques have been described for correction of deformity by soft-tissue releases. However, releasing the collateral ligament during TKA has unintended consequences such as the creation of significant mediolateral instability and a flexion gap which exceeds the extension gap; both of these may require a constrained prosthesis to achieve stability. We will show that soft-tissue balance can be achieved even in cases of severe varus deformity without performing a superficial medial collateral ligament release. The steps are: Determining pre-operatively whether deformity is predominantly intra-articular or extra-articular; Individualizing the valgus resection angle and bony resection depth; Reduction osteotomy, posteromedial capsule resection, sliding medial condylar osteotomy, extra-articular corrective osteotomy; Compensating for bone loss; Only rarely deploying a more constrained device. Case examples will be presented to illustrate the entire spectrum of varus deformities

Soft-tissue release plays an integral part in primary total knee arthroplasty by ‘balancing’ the knee. Asian patients often present late and consequently may have large deformities due to significant bone loss and contractures medially, and stretching of the lateral collateral ligament. Extra-articular deformities may aggravate the situation further and make correction of these deformities more arduous. Several techniques have been described for correction of deformity by soft-tissue releases. However, releasing the collateral ligament during TKA has unintended consequences such as the creation of significant mediolateral instability and a flexion gap which exceeds the extension gap; both of these may require a constrained prosthesis to achieve stability. We will show that soft-tissue balance can be achieved even in cases of severe varus deformity without performing a superficial medial collateral ligament release. The steps are: 1. Determining preoperatively whether deformity is predominantly intra-articular or extra-articular; 2. Individualizing the valgus resection angle and bony resection depth; 3. Reduction osteotomy, posteromedial capsule resection, sliding medial condylar osteotomy, extra-articular corrective osteotomy; 4. Compensating for bone loss; 5. Only rarely deploying a more constrained device. Case examples will be presented to illustrate the entire spectrum of varus deformities