Hinged elbow orthoses (HEO) are often used to allow protected motion of the unstable elbow. However, biomechanical studies have not shown HEO to improve the stability of a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow. This lack of effectiveness may be due to the straight hinge of current HEO designs which do not account for the native carrying angle of the elbow. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a custom-designed HEO with adjustable valgus angulation on stabilizing the LCL deficient elbow. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An LCL injured (LCLI) model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. The adjustable HEO was secured to the arm and its effect with 0°, 10°, and 20° (BR00, BR10, BR20) of valgus angulation was investigated. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. We examined 5 elbow states, intact, LCLI, BR00, BR10, BR20. There were significant differences in varus and ER angulation between different elbow states with the forearm both pronated and supinated (P=0 for all). The LCLI state with or without the brace resulted in significant increases in varus angulation and ER of the ulnohumeral articulation compared to the intact state (P 0.05). The difference between each of the brace angles and the LCLI state ranged from 1.1° to 2.4° for varus angulation and 0.5° to 1.6° for ER. Although there was a trend toward decreasing varus and external rotation angulation of the ulnohumeral articulation with the application of this adjustable HEO, none of the brace angles examined in this biomechanical investigation was able to fully restore the stability of the LCL deficient elbow. This lack of stabilizing effect may be due to the weight of the brace exerting unintentional varus and torsional forces on the unstable elbow. Previous investigations have shown that the varus arm position is highly unstable in the LCL deficient elbow. Our results demonstrate that application of an HEO with an adjustable carrying angle does not sufficiently stabilize the LCL deficient elbow in this highly unstable position and varus arm position should continue to be avoided in the rehabilitation programs of an LCL deficient elbow

Aims. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate machine-learning-based computerized adaptive tests (CATs) for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and its subscales. Methods. We developed CAT algorithms for the OHS, OKS, OSS, overall OES, and each of the OES subscales, using responses to the full-length questionnaires and a machine-learning technique called regression tree learning. The algorithms were evaluated through a series of simulation studies, in which they aimed to predict respondents’ full-length questionnaire scores from only a selection of their item responses. In each case, the total number of items used by the CAT algorithm was recorded and CAT scores were compared to full-length questionnaire scores by mean, SD, score distribution plots, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation (ICC), and the Bland-Altman method. Differences between CAT scores and full-length questionnaire scores were contextualized through comparison to the instruments’ minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results. The CAT algorithms accurately estimated 12-item questionnaire scores from between four and nine items. Scores followed a very similar distribution between CAT and full-length assessments, with the mean score difference ranging from 0.03 to 0.26 out of 48 points. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and ICC were 0.98 for each 12-item scale and 0.95 or higher for the OES subscales. In over 95% of cases, a patient’s CAT score was within five points of the full-length questionnaire score for each 12-item questionnaire. Conclusion. Oxford Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Oxford Elbow Score (including separate subscale scores) CATs all markedly reduce the burden of items to be completed without sacrificing score accuracy. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):786–794

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication of traumatic elbow injuries. The reported rates of post-traumatic HO formation vary from less than 5% with simple elbow dislocations, to greater than 50% in complex fracture-dislocations. Previous studies have identified fracture-dislocations, delayed surgical intervention, and terrible triad injuries as risk factors for HO formation. There is, however, a paucity of literature regarding the accuracy of diagnosing post-traumatic elbow HO. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of HO diagnosis using standard radiographs of the elbow at 52 weeks post-injury, as well as to report on the rate of mature compared with immature HO. We hypothesized inter-rater reliability would be poor among raters for HO formation. Prospectively collected data from a large clinical trial was reviewed by three independent reviewers (one senior orthopedic resident, one senior radiology resident, and one expert upper extremity orthopedic surgeon). Each reviewer examined anonymized 52-week post-injury radiographs of the elbow and recorded: 1. the presence or absence of HO, 2. the location of HO, 3. the size of the HO (in cm, if present), and 4. the maturity of the HO formation. Maturity was defined by consensus prior to image review and defined as an area of well-defined cortical and medullary bone outside the cortical borders of the humerus, ulna, or radius. Immature lesions were defined as an area of punctate calcification with an ill-defined cloud-like density outside the cortical borders of the humerus, ulna or radius. Data were collected using a standardized online data collection form (CognizantMD, Toronto, ON, CA). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Fleiss’ Kappa statistic and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for HO formation in general, as well as mature HO at 52 weeks post injury. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio (version1.4, RStudio, Boston, MA, USA). A total of 79 radiographs at the 52-week follow-up were reviewed (54% male, mean age 50, age SD 14, 52% operatively treated). Inter-rater reliability using Fleiss’ Kappa was k= 0.571 (p = 0.0004) indicating moderate inter-rater reliability among the three reviewers. The rate of immature HO at 52 weeks was 56%. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified male sex as a significant risk factor for HO development (OR 5.29, 1.55-20.59 CI, p = 0.011), but not for HO maturity at 52 weeks. Age, time to surgery, and operative intervention were not found to be significant predictors for either HO formation or maturity of the lesion in this cohort. Our study demonstrates moderate inter-rater reliability in determining the presence of HO at 52 weeks post-elbow injury. There was a high rate (56%) of immature HO at 52-week follow-up. We also report the finding of male sex as a significant risk factor for post traumatic HO development. Future research directions could include investigation into possible male predominance for traumatic HO formation, as well as improving inter-rater reliability through developing a standardized and validated classification system for reporting the radiographic features of HO formation around the elbow

Clinical assessment of elbow deformity in children at present is mainly based on physical examination and plain X-ray images, which may be inaccurate if the elbow is not in fully supination; furthermore, the rotational deformity is even harder to be determined by such methods. Morrey suggested that the axis of rotation of the elbow joint can be simplified to a single axis. Based on such assumption, we are proposing a method to assess elbow deformity using rotational axis of the joint, and an optimized calculation algorithm is presented. The rotation axis of elbow in respective to the upper arm can be obtained from the motion tract of markers placed at the forearm. Cadaver study was done, in which three skeletal motion trackers were placed over both the anterior aspect of humerus, as well as distal ulna. Osteotomy was created at the supracondylar region of humerus through lateral approach, and the bone fragments were stabilized with a set of external skeletal fixator, leaving the soft tissue intact. The amount of deformity was created manually by adjusting the position of the distal fragment via skeletal fixator. Ultrasound 3D motion tracking system from Zebris® was used in this study, and the program was developed under the Matlab environment. Cycles of passive elbow flexion/extension motion were carried out for each set of deformity. The data were initially transformed to humerus coordinate, and since the upper arm was not absolutely stationary, its influence on the measured position of ulna was adjusted. With this adjusted data, a best fit plane that would include most of the ulna positions (MU) within a minimal distance was obtained. The rotation axis was calculated as the normal vector to this plane, and the carrying angle could subsequently be assessed according to the relationship between this axis and the x-axis on the xy-plane as well as on the xz-plane. Fresh frozen cadaver study was conducted in the Medical Simulation Center at Tzu-Chi University. After adjustment of the raw data to eliminate the influence of humerus motion, the ulna motion could be narrowed down from a band of 10mm to 3mm, with a significant smaller standard deviation. The rotation axis was obtained by the normal vector to the best fit plane. Two different approaches were attempted to find the plane. In the first method, the plane was obtained via least square method from the adjusted ulna positions, and the second method found the plane via RANSAC method. Calculations were repeated several times for each method, and the results showed a variation of 5 degrees in the first method and about 2 degrees in the second method. Rotational axis can be used to define the 3-dimensional deformity of elbow joint; however, it is difficult to obtain such axis accurately due to hypermobility and multi-directional motion of the shoulder joint. In this study, we have developed another method to assess the elbow deformity using motion analysis system instead of the conventional image studies, and this may be applicable clinically if the facility becomes more accessible in the future. (This research was supported by the project TCRD-TPE-99-30 granted by the Buddhist Tzu-Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch)

The choice of whether to perform antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate fixation (PF) poses a conundrum for the surgeon who must strike the balance between anatomical restoration while reducing elbow and shoulder functional impairment. Most humeral middle third shaft fractures are amenable to conservative management given the considerable acceptable deformity and anatomical compensation by patients. This study is concerned with the patient reported outcomes regarding shoulder and elbow function for IMN and PF respectively. A prospective cohort study following up all the cases treated surgically for middle third humeral fractures from 2016 to 2022 at a single centre. Telephonically an analogue pain score, an American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score for shoulder function and the Oxford Elbow score (OES) for elbow function were obtained. One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty four patients participated in the study, fifteen had IMN (62.5%) and nine had PF (37.5%.). The shoulder function outcomes showed no statistical difference with an average ASES score of sixty-six for the IMN group and sixty-nine for the PF group. Women and employed individuals expressed greater functional impairment. Hand dominance has no impact on the scores of elbow and shoulder function post operatively. The impairment of abduction score post antegrade nailing was higher in the antegrade nailing group than the plated group. The OES demonstrated greater variance in elbow function in the PF group with the IMN group expressing greater elbow disfunction. This study confirms that treatment of middle third humerus shaft fractures by plate fixation is marginally superior to antegrade intramedullary nailing in preserving elbow function and abduction ability

We have previously reported on the medium-term outcomes following a non-operative protocol of a short period of splinting followed by early movement to treat simple dislocations of the elbow. We undertook extended follow up of our original patient study group to determine whether the excellent results previously reported were maintained in the very long-term. A secondary question was to determine the rate and need for any late surgical intervention. We attempted to contact all patients in the original patient study group. Patients were requested to complete the Oxford elbow score (OES), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients were requested to attend a face-to-face assessment where they underwent a clinical examination including neurovascular assessment, range-of-motion and an assessment of ligamentous stability. Seventy-one patients (65%) from the original patient study group agreed to participate in the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 19.3 years. At final follow-up patients reported excellent functional outcome scores and a preserved functional range of movement in the injured elbows. The mean DASH score was 5.22 points and the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 91.6 points. The mean satisfaction score was 90.9 points. Our study shows that the excellent outcomes following treatment with a protocol of a short period of splinting and early movement remain excellent and are maintained into the very long term. These findings support our hypothesis that this treatment protocol is appropriate and suitable for most patients with simple dislocations of the elbow. The role for primary ligamentous repair for this patient group should be carefully considered. Work to more clearly define the anticipated benefits of surgery for specific patient groups or injury patterns would help to support informed decision making

The role of anconeus in elbow stability has been a long-standing debate. Anatomical and electromyographic studies have suggested a potential role as a stabilizer. However, to our knowledge, no clinical or biomechanical studies have investigated its role in improving the stability of a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow. Seven cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An LCL injured model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. The anconeus tendon and its aponeurosis were sutured in a Krackow fashion and tensioned to 10N and 20N through a transosseous tunnel at its origin. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. During active motion, the injured model resulted in a significant increase in varus angulation (5.3°±2.9°, P=.0001 pronation, 3.5°±3.4°, P=.001 supination) and external rotation (ER) (8.6°±5.8°, P=.001 pronation, 7.1°±6.1°, P=.003 supination) of the ulnohumeral articulation compared to the control state (varus angle −2.8°±3.4° pronation, −3.3°±3.2° supination, ER angle 2.1°±5.6° pronation, 1.6°±5.8° supination). Tensioning of the anconeus significantly decreased the varus angulation (−1.2°±4.5°, P=.006 for 10N in pronation, −3.9°±4°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, −4.3°±4°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −5.3°±4.2°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) and ER angle (2.6°±4.5°, P=.008 for 10N in pronation, 0.3°±5°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, 0.1°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −0.8°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) of the injured elbow. Comparing anconeus tensioning to the control state, there was no significant difference in varus-valgus angulation except with anconeus tensioning to 20N with the forearm in supination which resulted in less varus angulation (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.267 for 20N in pronation, P=.604 for 10N in supination, P=.030 for 20N in supination). Although there were statistically significant differences in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state (except with anconeus tensioning to 10N with the forearm in pronation which was not significantly different), anconeus tensioning resulted in decreased external rotation angle compared to the control state (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.020 for 20N in pronation, P=.033 for 10N in supination, P=.001 for 20N in supination). In the highly unstable varus elbow orientation, anconeus tensioning restores the in vitro stability of an LCL deficient elbow during simulated active motion with the forearm in both pronation and supination. Interestingly, there was a significant difference in varus-valgus angulation between 20N anconeus tensioning with the forearm supinated and the control state, with less varus angulation for the anconeus tensioning which suggests that loads less than 20N is sufficient to restore varus stability during active motion with the forearm supinated. Similarly, the significant difference observed in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state suggests that lesser degrees of anconeus tensioning would be sufficient to restore the posterolateral instability of an LCL deficient elbow. These results may have several clinical implications such as a potential role for anconeus strengthening in managing symptomatic lateral elbow instability

Previous biomechanical studies of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries and their surgical repair, reconstruction and rehabilitation have primarily relied on gravity effects with the arm in the varus position. The application of torsional moments to the forearm manually in the laboratory is not reproducible, hence studies to date likely do not represent forces encountered clinically. The aim of this investigation was to develop a new biomechanical testing model to quantify posterolateral stability of the elbow using an in vitro elbow motion simulator. Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. A threaded screw was then inserted on the dorsal aspect of the proximal ulna and a weight hanger was used to suspend 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight from the screw head to allow torsional moments to be applied to the ulna. An LCL injured (LCLI) model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. Ulnohumeral rotation was recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active and passive elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. A repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to compare elbow states (intact, LCLI, and LCLI with 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight). During active motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of weights did not significantly increase the external rotation (ER) of the ulnohumeral articulation (10°±7°, P=.268 400g, 10.5°±7.1°, P=.156 600g, 11°±7.2°, P=.111 800g) compared to the LCLI state (8.4°±6.4°) with the forearm pronated. However, with the forearm supinated, the addition of 800g of weight significantly increased the ER (9.2°±5.9°, P=.038) compared to the LCLI state (5.9°±5.5°) and the addition of 400g and 600g of weights approached significance (8.2°±5.7°, P=.083 400g, 8.7°±5.9°, P=.054 600g). During passive motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.0001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of 600g and 800g but not 400g resulted in a significant increase in ER of the ulnohumeral articulation (9.3°±7.8°, P=.103 400g, 11.2°±6.2°, P=.004 600g, 12.7°±6.8°, P=.006 800g) compared to the LCLI state (3.7°±5.4°) with the forearm pronated. With the forearm supinated, the addition of 400g, 600g, and 800g significantly increased the ER (11.7°±6.7°, P=.031 400g, 13.5°±6.8°, P=.019 600g, 14.9°±6.9°, P=.024 800g) compared to the LCLI state (4.3°±6.6°). This investigation confirms a novel biomechanical testing model for studying PLRI. Moreover, it demonstrates that the application of even small amounts of torsional moment on the forearm with the arm in the varus position exacerbates the rotational instability seen with the LCL deficient elbow. The effect of torsional loading was significantly worse with the forearm supinated and during passive elbow motion. This new model allows for a more provocative testing of elbow stability after LCL repair or reconstruction. Furthermore, this model will allow for smaller sample sizes to be used while still demonstrating clinically significant differences. Future biomechanical studies evaluating LCL injuries and their repair and rehabilitation should consider using this testing protocol

Postero-lateral rotator instability (PLRI) is the most common pattern of recurrent elbow instability. Unfortunately, current imaging to aid PLRI diagnosis is limited. We have developed an ultrasound (US) technique to measure ulnohumeral joint gap with and without stress of the lateral ulnocollateral ligament. We sought to define lateral ulnohumeral joint gap measurements in the resting and stressed state to provide insight into how US may aid diagnosis of PLRI. Sixteen elbows were evaluated in eight healthy volunteers. Lateral ulnohumeral gap was measured on US in the resting position and with posterolateral drawer stress test maneuver applied. Joint laxity was calculated as the difference between stress and rest conditions. Measurements were performed by two independent readers with comparison performed between stress and rest positions. A highly significant difference in ulnohumeral gap was seen between stress and rest conditions (Reader 1: p < 0 .0001 and Reader 2: p=0.0002) with median values of 2.93 mm and 2.50 mm at rest and 3.92 mm and 3.40 mm at stress for Reader 1 and 2 respectively. Median joint laxity was 1.02 mm and 0.74 mm respectively for each reader. Correlation and agreement between readers was good. This study provides key new insight into use of US for diagnosis as PLRI as it defines normal ulnohumeral distances and demonstrates widening when applying the posterolateral drawer stress maneuver. Further evaluation of this technique is required in patients with PLRI

The causes of a stiff elbow are numerous including: post-traumatic elbow, burns, head injury, osteoarthritis, inflammatory joint disease and congenital. Types of stiffness include: loss of elbow flexion, loss of elbow extension and loss of forearm rotation. All three have different prognoses in terms of the timing of surgery and the likelihood of restoration of function. Contractures can be classified into extrinsic and intrinsic (all intrinsic develop some extrinsic component). Functional impairment can be assessed medicolegally; however, in clinical practice the patient puts an individual value on the arc of motion. Objectively most functions can be undertaken with an arc of 30 to 130 degrees. The commonest cause of a Post-traumatic Stiff elbow is a radial head fracture or a complex fracture dislocation. Risk factors for stiffness include length of immobilisation, associated fracture with dislocation, intra-articular derangement, delayed surgical treatment, associated head injury, heterotopic ossification. Early restoration of bony columns and joint stability to allow early mobilisation reduces incidence of joint stiffness. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is common in fracture dislocation of the elbow. Neural Axis trauma alone causes HO in elbows in 5%. However, combined neural trauma and elbow trauma the incidence is 89%. Stiffness due to thermal injury is usually related to the degree rather than the site. The majority of patients have greater than 20% total body area involved. Extrinsic contractures are usually managed with a sequential release of soft tissues commencing with a capsular excision (retaining LCL/MCL), posterior bundle of the MCL +/− ulna nerve decompression (if there is loss of flexion to 100 degrees). This reliably achieved via a posterior incision, a lateral column exposure +/− ulna nerve mobilisation. A medial column exposure is a viable alternative. Arthroscopic capsular release although associated with a quicker easier rehabilitation is associated with increased neural injury. Timing of release is specific to the type of contracture, i.e. flexion contractures after approx. six months, extension contractures ASAP but after four months, loss of forearm rotation less 6 to 24 months. The use of Hinged Elbow Fixators is increasing. The indications include reconstructions that require protection whilst allowing early movement, persistent instability or recurrent/late instability or interposition arthroplasty. Post-operative rehabilitation requires good analgesia, joint stability and early movement. The role of CPM is often helpful but still being evaluated

Purpose. The measurement of radial head translation about the capitellum (in percent): the radio-capitellum ratio (RCR) has proven to have excellent inter- and intra-observer reliabilities when measuring the RCR on a lateral radiological view of elbows at 90° of flexion and in the neutral position of the forearm. However, in the clinical setting, radiographs may be taken with the elbow in different positions. However, the purpose was to validate the RCR measurement method on elbows in different positions in flexion-extension and in different positions of the forearm in pronation-supination. Method. Fifty-one healthy volunteers were recruited to evaluate the RCR in different elbow positions. Lateral elbow radiographs were taken with the elbow in different magnitude of ROM: maximal extension, maximal flexion, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation. The measurements of the RCR were done using the software SliceOmatic. ANOVA and paired T-test were used to assess the difference of the RCR depending on the position of the elbow and of the forearm. Pearson coefficients were calculated to obtain the correlation between the RCR in each different position. Results. The mean RCR for each position were the following: elbow in maximal extension: −2%±7%, elbow in maximal flexion: −5%±9%, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral: −2%±5%, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination: 1%±6% and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation: 1%±5%. According to the Anova results, a significant difference exists between the RCR in different elbow positions (p=0.01) and in the different forearm positions (p<0.001). Paired T-test confirmed a significant difference between maximal elbow flexion and elbow flexion at 90° (p=0.003), as well as for maximal elbow extension and maximal elbow flexion (p=0.034). According to the Pearson coefficient, significant correlations exist between: elbow flexion at 90° and in maximal flexion (r=0.19, p=0.050); the forearm in neutral and in supination (r=0.34, p<0.001); the forearm in neutral and in pronation (r=0.42, p<0.001). Conclusion. The RCR method is dependent on elbow (flexion-extension) and forearm (pronation-supination) positions. At both maximal elbow positions in flexion and extension, the measurements of the RCR have a higher standard deviation. In order to decrease its variability, we recommend as a convention measuring the RCR on lateral radiographs with the elbow at 90° and the forearm in neutral position. However, 95% of the values of RCR (except in maximal flexion which is unusual in trauma) are included in the normal range of RCR from −5% to 13%. Thus a value outside this range in any elbow positions (except maximal flexion) or any forearm positions must raise doubt on elbow alignment. Then, with a capitellum of 25 mm of diameter, the translation of the radial head must be less than 1 mm posterior and less than 3 mm anterior from the center of the capitellum

Background. The quest for the perfectly designed elbow prosthesis continues as instability and loosening remain the foremost reasons for the failure of total elbow replacement (TER). The Discovery® Elbow System (Biomet, UK) (Figure 1), which has been used in UK since 2003, is one of the latest generations of linked prosthesis. This system was designed to decrease polyethylene-bushing wear, improve anatomic stem design, restore elbow joint biomechanics, and produce a hinge that could be easily revised. This report describes the short term outcome of TER using the Discovery® Elbow System. Patients and Methods. A total of 60 TERs including 48 primary and 12 revisions were performed between 2003 and 2008. Patients included 21 males (37%) and 36 females (63%) with a mean age of 63 years. The indications for primary TER were advanced rheumatoid arthritis (n=19), osteoarthritis (n=16), post traumatic osteoarthritis (n=9), acute fractures (n=3), and haemophilic arthropathy (n=1). The outcome was assessed using pain score, Liverpool Elbow Score (LES), and range of movement during a mean follow-up of 26 months. Associated complications were documented. Radiological assessment included evaluation for loosening, instability and periprosthetic fractures. Results. The mean LES was significantly (p<0.001) improved from 3.8 (±1) pre-operatively to 6.9 (±2) at the final follow- up. Significant improvements were noted in elbow flexion from 100° (±22) to 120° (±15), supination from 41° (±28) to 65° (±20) and pronation from 52° (±22) to 72° (±18). There was no significant change in elbow extension. Mean improvement in flexion-extension and pronation-supination arc was 22° and 44°, respectively. 46 cases (77%) were completely pain-free at the final follow-up. The main complications included deep infection (4 cases – treated with staged revision TER), postoperative ulnar neuropathy (3 cases–treated with decompression), intra-operative fractures of medial condyle (3 cases – treated non-operatively with brace), and elbow haemarthrosis (1 case). Discussion. TER with Discovery® Elbow System resulted in either no pain or mild pain in 87% of cases. Patients undergoing Acclaim, Souter-Strathclyde, GSB III, and Coonrad-Morrey TER have been reported to have no/mild pain in 64%, 67%, 50–92% and 60–100% of cases, respectively. A 22° improvement in flexion-extension arc is comparable to that of Acclaim (23°), Souter-Strathclyde (15°), GSB III (19–33°), and Coonrad-Morrey (17–26°) TER. An improvement of 44° in pronation-supination arc in our series is also comparable to that of 31–67° reported for GSB III and higher than the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis (21–28°). In terms of complications, an infection rate of 6.7% is consistent with those reported for GSB III TER (7–11%) and Coonrad-Morrey (6–8%). The incidence of persistent ulnar neuropathy was lower compared to GSB III TER (11–14%), Coonrad-Morrey (12–26%), and Acclaim (8%). While the survival of Discovery TER was 93%, the survival of GSB III (5–6 years) and Coonrad-Morrey (5 years) has been reported as 71–85% and 72–90%. The results indicate that Discovery® Elbow System is an effective device for total elbow arthroplasty in terms of functional improvement, pain relief and range of motion at short-term follow-up

Aim:. To investigate the clinical outcomes of elbows with post-traumatic stiffness treated by open surgical release. Methods:. A retrospective review was completed on thirty-five consecutively managed patients who underwent an open elbow release for post-traumatic stiffness between 2007 and 2012. Pre-operative and post-operative range of motion (ROM), pain scores and functional outcomes were recorded. Results:. Mean follow-up was 31 months (6–84). The cohort consisted of 20 male and 15 female patients with an average age at time of surgery of 34 years (17–59). The interval from injury to time of release was 26 months (6–180). An improvement in mean ROM from 49° (0°–105°) to 102° (55°–150°) was obtained. The improvement in ROM in patients with pre-operative heterotopic bone was 61° compared to 45° in patients without heterotopic bone. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 44 pre-operatively to 82 at most recent follow-up. Mean VAS scores improved from 5.9 pre-operatively to 2.8 at most recent follow-up. Patients rated the affected elbow a mean of 73% as compared to the contralateral/normal side (50–100%). Apart from a 10% incidence of transient ulnar nerve neurapraxia in patients who had a medial or combined approach, complication rates and functional outcomes were comparable between medial, lateral and combined approaches. Conclusion:. Open release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness results in satisfactory functional outcomes in the majority of cases, with no significant differences between medial, lateral or combined approaches

Purpose of study:. Total elbow replacement (TER) is one of the surgical options for treatment of severe haemophilic arthropathy of the elbow. There are only a few small series described in the literature. The goal of our study was to evaluate our cases and add these data to the known literature. Methods:. A retrospective analysis of a series of 8 TER's (5 patients) was performed. Patients were seen in clinic and evaluated by physical examination, a VAS score for pain, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS, 100 points=excellent) and X-rays of the affected elbow. Mean follow-up was 91 (4–236) months, and 103 months when we excluded a patient with only 4 months follow-up. Primary diagnosis was Hemophilia type A in 4 and von Willebrand disease in 1 patient. 2 patients were positive for Hepatitis C and 3 for HIV. Mean age at primary surgery was 46.7 (31.8–63.1) years. Results:. The mean VAS score for pain improved from 7.9 to 0.5 and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score from 36 to 93. The arc for flexion/extension improved from 68° to 91° and from to 75° to 153° for pro- and supination. Revision surgery was performed in 3 out of 8 TER's; 1 because of loosening of the humeral component (18.7 years postop), 1 for loosening of the ulnar component (9.9 years postoperatively) and 1 due to a late deep infection, 4 years postoperatively. The last case was treated with an excision arthroplasty, the others with a revision. No replacement currently shows signs of loosening. Conclusion:. This is a small retrospective study, as are the other studies on TER in haemophilic patients. It demonstrated excellent clinical outcome and an acceptable survival rate of a TER, with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years even in this young patient population

Introduction. Tennis and Golfers elbows (TE, GE) are difficult conditions to treat. Ultrasound guided steroid injection (UGSI) is one of the treatment modalities in treating refractory TE and GE. We present our clinical experience and short to mid-term results of patients with TE and GE treated with UGSI. Methods. Patients with persistent TE and GE treated with UGSI (Marcaine and kenalog) at a tertiary centre between 2007 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow up was 4 months (Range 2–21 months). Patients were assessed for pain relief, recurrence of symptoms and surgical release. Results. USGI was performed on 181 elbows (144 patients). There were 68 male and 76 female patients. Mean age 49.5 years (range 17–82). At the time of UGSI, chronic features of TE were established in 144 elbows and signs of GE were identified in 37 elbows. At the review clinic, 155 (86%) elbows were reported to be completely pain free, 10 (5%) elbows experienced no improvement and 16 (9%) elbows encountered residual symptoms. However, a total of 98 (54%) elbows experienced recurrence of symptoms. For TE, symptoms recurred in 74/144 (51%) elbows at a mean interval of 5.8 months (95% CI: 4.6 to 6.9 months). For GE, symptoms recurred in 24/37 (64%) elbows at a mean interval of 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.4 to 5.0 months). Repeat USGI was performed in 24 elbows, of which 20 elbows were associated with further recurrence. Fifty seven (50%) elbows underwent surgical release (45 TE and 12 GE). Discussion. USGI appears to be a beneficial short term measure in controlling the symptoms of TE and GE. However, recurrence or failure to improve occurred in 68% of elbows. Repeat USGI is associated with high failure rate (83%) and surgical option should be explored in these refractory conditions

Introduction. Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) is recognized as an effective treatment solution for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or for traumatic conditions. Current total elbow devices can be divided into linked or unlinked design. The first design usually presents a linking element (i.e. an axle) to link together the ulnar and humeral components to stabilize the joint; the second one does not present any linkage and the stability is provided by both intrinsic design constraints and the soft tissues. Convertible modular solutions allow for an intraoperative decision to link or unlink the prosthesis; the modular connections introduce however additional risks in terms of both mechanical strength and potential fatigue and fretting phenomena that may arise not only due to low demand activities loads, but also high demand (HD) ones that could be even more detrimental. The aim of this study was to assess the strength of the modular connection between the axle and the ulnar component in a novel convertible elbow prosthesis design under simulated HD and activities of daily living (ADLs) loading. Methods. A novel convertible total elbow prosthesis (LimaCorporate, IT) comprising both ulnar and humeral components that can be linked together by means of an axle, was used. Both typical ADLs and HD torques to be applied to the axle were determined based on finite element analysis (FEA); the boundary load conditions for the FEA were determined based on kinematics analysis on real patients in previous studies. The FEA resultant moment acting on the axle junction during typical ADLs (i.e. feeding with 7.2lbs weight in hand) was 3.2Nm while for HD loads (i.e. sit to stand) was 5.7 Nm. In the experimental setup, 5 axle specimens coupled with 5 ulnar bodies through a tapered connection (5 Nm assembly torque) were fixed to a torque actuator (MTS Bionix) and submerged in a saline solution (9g/l). A moment of 3.2 Nm was applied to the axle for 5M cycles through a fixture to test it under ADLs loading. After 5M cycles, the axles were analyzed with regards to fretting behavior and then re-assembled to test them against HD loading by applying 5.7 Nm for 200K cycles (corresponding to 20 years function). Results. All 5 samples withstood all 5.2M loading cycles without any mechanical failure. At the end of 5M cycles, each axle was still stable as the measured disassembly torque was 3.96 +/−0.18 Nm. Slight signs of fretting were detected on the tapered connection after 5M cycles, however they did not compromise the mechanical connection nor the stability. Discussion and Conclusions. Currently there are no reference standards that properly define protocols for biomechanical testing of elbow prostheses. In the present study, a test to mechanically assess the strength of an axle connection under both typical ADLs and HD loads was set. The connection was able to withstand the imposed conditions. In general, testing of TEA devices should include not only standard ADLs loads but also HD loads, which could be more detrimental for the long-term survivorship. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Although Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) generally provides favorable clinical outcomes, its complications have been reported with high rate compared with other joints. Previously, we used the Bryan & Morrey approach in TEA, which included separating the triceps muscle subperiosteally from the olecranon; however, since 2008, in order to prevent skin trouble and deficiency of the triceps, we performed TEA by MISTEA method, which required no removal of the subcutaneous tissue in the region of the olecranon and no release or stripping of the triceps tendon. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the MISTEA method by evaluating and comparing muscle strength and complications by using both the Bryan & Morrey approach and MISTEA method. Materials and Methods. The study was conducted on 23 elbows, on which elbow muscle strength could be measured postoperatively at more than 6 months after TEA. Thirteen elbows were operated on the Bryan & Morrey approach (BM group; mean age, 62.3 years; mean follow-up period, 27 months), and 10 elbows on the MISTEA method (MIS group; mean age, 67.6 years; mean follow-up period, 19.1 months). To determine the elbow extensor and flexor strengths, measurements were conducted on the affected side for the BM group, and on both the affected and healthy sides for the MIS group. Further, the “extension/flexion ratio” as well as the “affected/healthy side ratio” and complications were assessed. Results. Excluding the elbow extensor strength of 3 elbows in the BM group, which could not be measured too week. The extension/flexion ratio was as follows: in the BM group, 0.61 and in the MIS group, 0.93 on the affected side and 0.81 on the healthy side. For the MIS group, in which measurements could be performed on both the sides, the “affected/healthy side ratio” was 0.72 in flexion and 0.91 in extension. In terms of complications, skin trouble was found on 2 elbows in the BM group and on 1 elbow in the MIS group; further, rupture of the triceps tendon was suspected in 3 elbows in the BM group but was not found in the MIS group. Discussion. In our study, deficiency in triceps muscle was found in 3 of 13 elbows with the Bryan & Morrey approach. MISTEA method may be the reason for prevention of deficiency or rupture of the triceps tendon. The MIS group had higher extension/flexion ratio in the affected side, suggesting the possibility that either the extensor strength had increased or the flexor strength had weakened. Further, in the MIS group, the extension showed an “affected/healthy side” ratio, which means that an extensor strength almost equivalent to that of the healthy side was maintained, whereas the flexor strength was 72% of that on the healthy side, suggesting that the flexor strength may have decreased. Loss of the flexor strength may be because the MISTEA method involves partial release of the brachialis muscle and the joint's center of rotation to move slightly towards the proximal side

Purpose. Clinical outocome of revision total elbow arthroplasty(TEA) in rheumatoid arthritis(RA) patients were evaluated. Methods. Clinical outocome of revision TEA that underwent between 2005 and 2013 were evaluated. Causes of revision, implanted revised prosthesis, a clinical score (the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) elbow assessment score), the arc of motion and complications were investigated. Totally, 6 patients underwent revision TEA. The patients were females with a mean age of 60.4 years (range, 32 to 72). Results. Seventy-two primary TEAs were done in corresponding period. Six out of 72 (8.3%) TEAs were revised. Causes of revision were loosening, instability (dislocation) and breakage of a component in 3, 2 and 1 cases, respectively. A mean duration from initial TEA to revision surgery was 10.3 years (range, 1 to 13). Semi-constrained arthroplasties (5 Coonrad-Morrey, 1 Discovery) were used for revision surgery. A mean JOA elbow assessment score improved from 59 to 81 point at the time of follow up. The mean ROM, flexion was improved 125 degrees, to 131 degrees. Extension, supination and pronation was not changed. A fracture at the time of implant withdrawal occurred as an intraoperative complication. The fractures were recovered by wiring with autologous bone graft from the ilium and a good bone union was achieved in 2 out of 3 cases. However, a re-revision surgery with plate was required in the remaining case. Conclusions. Revision TEA provided a satisfactory functional outcome. An intraoperative fracture was a critical complication in this procedure

Purpose. The coronoid and collateral ligaments are key elbow stabilizers. When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. A coronoid prosthesis has been designed with an extended tip in an effort to augment elbow stability in the setting of residual collateral ligament insufficiency. The purpose of this biomechanical study, therefore, was to compare an anatomic coronoid replacement with an extended tip implant both with and without ligament insufficiency. Method. Two coronoid prostheses were designed and developed based on CT-derived images adjusted for cartilage thickness: an anatomical implant and an extended-tip implant. Passive elbow extension was performed in 7 cadaveric arms in the varus and valgus positions. Varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus was quantified with a tracking system with an intact coronoid, a 40% coronoid deficiency, an anatomical prosthesis, and an extended prosthesis, with the collateral ligaments sectioned and repaired. Results. Laxity increased following a 40% coronoid deficiency with both repaired (p<0.01) and sectioned collateral ligaments (p<0.01). With the ligaments repaired, there was no significant difference in laxity between the intact coronoid, the anatomic implant or the extended implant (p=0.88). Ligament sectioning with an intact coronoid produced severe joint instability, resulting in an average laxity (standard error) of 42.94.4 (p<0.01). With ligament sectioning, the anatomic prosthesis produced no change in laxity compared to the intact coronoid (p=0.72), whereas the extended implant reduced laxity by 20.56.3 (p=0.05). Conclusion. A coronoid prosthesis with an extended coronoid tip improves elbow stability relative to an anatomic prosthesis in the setting of collateral ligament insufficiency. This may prove useful in patients with comminuted coronoid fractures with concomitant ligament injuries, allowing for maintenance of elbow stability during ligament healing or reconstruction. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of these designs and to determine patient outcomes

Purpose. Radial head implant over-lengthening, a common cause of capitellar wear and clinical failure, is difficult to diagnose using radiographs of the injured elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine if a novel measurement technique based on contralateral elbow radiographs, termed the RACER method, could be used to accurately estimate the magnitude of radial head implant over-lengthening. Part I of this study examined the side-to-side consistency of radiographic landmarks used in the measurement technique. Part II of this study validated the technique using simulated radial head implant over-lengthening in a cadaveric model. Method. Part I: A side-to-side comparison of elbow joint dimensions was performed in 50 patients (100 radiographs). Part II: Radial head prostheses of varying lengths (0,+2mm,+4mm,+6mm,+8mm) were implanted in 4 paired cadaveric specimens (8 elbows). Radiographs were obtained and measurements were performed by 2 examiners blinded to implant size to determine if contralateral radiographs could diagnose and provide a valid estimate of the magnitude of implant over-lengthening. Intra and inter-rater reliability was determined. Results. No significant side-to-side differences (p>0.2) in radiographic measurements were identified between paired elbows. The RACER measurement technique using contralateral radiographs was successful in predicting the implant size (1mm) in 104 of 120 (87%) of scenarios tested. The sensitivity of the technique, the ability of the test to correctly identify over-lengthening when it was present within 1mm, was 98%. The intra-rater agreement for a single orthopaedic surgeon measuring on 2 separate occasions was excellent (ICC>0.90). The inter-rater agreement between two separate surgeons was also excellent, with the 95% lower confidence interval exceeding 0.90 in all cases. Conclusion. A novel measurement technique based on contralateral elbow radiographs can be used to diagnose and calculate the magnitude of radial head implant over-lengthening. Clinical Significance: Implantation of an incorrectly sized radial head prosthesis is not uncommon. The described technique can be used to effectively diagnose and determine the magnitude of over-lengthening