Abstract. Objective. This study assesses the prevalence of major and minor discordance between hip and spine T scores using Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-spectrometry (REMS). REMS is a novel technology that uses ultrasound and radiofrequency analysis to measure bone density and bone fragility at the hip and lumbar spine. The objective was to compare the results with the existing literature on Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) the current “gold standard” for bone densitometry. REMS and DEXA have been shown to have similar diagnostic accuracy, however, REMS has less human input when carrying out the scan, therefore the rates of discordance might be expected to be lower than for DEXA. Discordance poses a risk of misclassification of patients’ bone health status, causing diagnostic ambiguity and potentially sub-optimal management decisions. Reduction of discordance rates therefore has the potential to significantly improve treatment and patient outcomes. Methods. Results from 1,855 patients who underwent REMS investigations between 2018 and 2022 were available. Minor discordance is defined as a difference of one World Health Organisation (WHO) diagnostic classification (Normal / Osteopenia or Osteopenia / Osteoporosis). Major discordance is defined as a difference of two WHO diagnostic classifications (Normal / Osteoporosis). The results were compared with reported DEXA discordance rates. Results. 1,732 individuals had both hip and spine T scores available for analysis. There were 267 cases of discordance. No instances of major discordance were observed. The minor discordance rate was 15.4%. 6.5% of the REMS scans with minor discordance showed > 1.0 standard deviation (SD) difference between the T scores of the hip and spine. 19.4% had differences of between 0.6 SD and 1.0 SD while 73.9% had ≤ 0.5 SD or less. In 24.5% of the cases of REMS discordance the hip T scores were greater than the spine and in 75.5% of cases the spine T score was greater than the hip. Conclusions. The current analysis is the largest of its kind. It demonstrates that REMS has an overall lower rate of discordance than reported DEXA rates. Major discordance rates with DEXA range from 2–17%, but REMS avoids many of the positioning problems and post-processing errors inherent in DEXA scanning, which might account for the absence of major discordance. Rates of minor discordance in DEXA scans range between 38–51%. The REMS minor discordance rate being much lower than these rates suggests that it has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy considerably. Most REMS discordance results showed ≤ 0.5 SD variance between the T scores of the two sites, indicating close correlation in the bone densitometry analysis. Most studies of DEXA discordant results confirm that spinal T scores are more often higher than at the hip. The REMS results concur with this observation. Considering the comparable accuracy rates that have been shown between REMS and DEXA, with its much lower discordance rate, REMS can potentially improve current medical practice and enhance patient care. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background. Reduced bone mineral density is recognised as a risk factor for hip fractures and fragility fractures in general. Vitamin D is important in maintaining healthy bone mineral levels and can therefore affect risk of hip fracture. We investigated the correlation between vitamin D levels and bone mineral density, as well as fracture type, in neck of femur fractures and also assessed the relationship of vitamin D and social deprivation. Method. We included all patients admitted to our department, with a neck of femur fracture over one year (October 2013 to October 2014). We analysed vitamin D levels for all patients during admission and compared these to bone mineral density scores, based on DEXA scan results; hip fracture type & comminution, based on admission radiographs; and levels of social deprivation, based on the patient's address. Results. In total 360 patients were admitted over the study period, with a neck of femur fracture, of which 298 had vitamin D assessed and 76 had DEXA scans. Of these cohorts, 71% were found to be vitamin D deficient and 7% had osteoporosis. No significant correlation was found between vitamin D scores and bone density, or with level of vitamin D deficiency and fracture type or comminution. A significant correlation was however identified, between low vitamin D levels and decreasing levels of social deprivation (R=0.11, p=0.04). Conclusion. No relationship was identified between vitamin D levels and hip fracture type, suggesting that vitamin D cannot be used to predict patients at risk of more comminuted fractures. Although no relationship was also identified for bone mineral density and vitamin D, this may be because the sample size of DEXA scans was relatively small. Interestingly the relationship between vitamin D and social deprivation was the reverse of what was expected and suggests that affluent individuals may be at greater risk of low vitamin D

Summary. Arginine supplementation is helpful in treatment of osteoporosis. Introduction. Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived free radical involved in several biological processes as a bioregulator and as a second messenger. It inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption in vitro and regulates bone remodeling. Zolendronic acid has been established as a treatment for post menopausal osteoporosis. Study was done to compare the efficacy of Nitic oxide donor (L-arginine) with that of Zolendronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis. Method. The study was not designed to compare these two drugs against a placebo, because the beneficial effects of Zolendronic acid in treatment of osteoporosis are well established. Institutional Review Board approvals were obtained. One hundred patients of osteoporosis having T score of −2.5 or more, were randomised to receive L-arginine) or Zolendronic acid. All patients received 1.0 g of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D supplementation per day. In addition Group I patients received L-arginine (2 gm.) per day while Group II patients received zoledronic acid 5 mg i.v. over 15 min. Patient were followed at regular intervals clinically, by biochemical investigations and at one year for DEXA scan. Results. Patients in both groups improved clinically and bio-chemically over one year period. T score on DEXA scan at one year showed improvement in bone density. Average pretreatment T score was −3.65 in group I and −3.52 in group II. At one year followup average T score was −2.9 in group I and −2.6 in group II. Difference was not statistically significant. Discussion. Oral administration of L-arginine in pharmacological doses induces growth hormone and insulin like growth factor-1 responses and stimulates nitric oxide synthesis. Growth hormone and insulin like growth factor-1 are important mediator of bone turnover and osteoblastic bone formation. While nitric oxide is potent inhibitor of osteoclastic bone resorption because of this dual effect on physiological regulator of bone remodeling. L-arginine could potentially increase bone formation over bone resorption and consequently increase bone mass. Oral supplementation of L-arginine may be novel strategy in prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Locking plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures has demonstrated good results tempered by a significant rate of loss of fixation. Reported rates of failure are typically around 10% of cases but can be 20% or higher. In addition large series are often made up of a diverse patient population, so we have chosen to focus solely on patients confirmed to have significantly reduced BMD who can be considered a subset at high risk of fixation failure. Twenty-three patients (5 male, 18 female) with a proximal humeral fracture treated by locking plate fixation were confirmed on DEXA scanning to be osteopaenic (17), osteoporotic (4) or severely osteoporotic (2). Patients early in the series were reviewed retrospectively and recalled for an updated assessment where appropriate, and the remainder were followed prospectively. The average age was 66 years (range 49 to 82). Follow up was for an average of nine months following surgery (range 2 and a half to 28 months). 17 patients underwent surgery for acute injuries and 6 for established surgical neck non-unions. Seven injuries were 2-part fractures, 12 3-part, 3 were 4-part and one a 2-part surgical neck non-union.1 plate failed due to complete loss of fixation within 2 months in a patient with severe osteoporosis and was treated with removal of metalwork. This was the only injury that failed to unite. Avascular necrosis occurred in three patients with two revised to a hemiarthroplasty. 1 patient had ongoing pain and underwent removal of the plate. Our series demonstrated that locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures is associated with a low rate of fixation failure and satisfactory outcomes in patients with significantly reduced bone mineral density

Summary Statement. It is now possible to diagnose osteoporosis using incidental abdominal CT scans; applying this approach to fractures of the cervical spine demonstrates levels of osteoporosis in patients over 65. Introduction. Recently published data now makes it possible to screen for osteoporosis in patients who, in the course of their hospital stay, have had Computed Tomography (CT) scans of their abdomen for reasons other than direct imaging. This is as a result of CT derived bone mineral density (BMD) in the first lumbar vertebra (L1) being correlated BMD derived from Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. The advantage of this is the reduction in both cost and radiation exposure. Although age has a detrimental effect on BMD, relatively few patients have formal DEXA studies. The aims of this study were to evaluate the utility of this new technique in a cohort of patients with acute fractures of the cervical spine and to compare relative values for BMD in patients aged over 65 with those aged under 65, and thus define the role of osteoporosis in these injuries. Methods & Patients. Following Institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective study of patients who presented to a level I trauma center with acute fractures of the cervical spine between 2010 and 2013; patients also had to have had a CT scan of their L1 vertebra either during the admission or within 6 months of their admission (for any other clinical reason). Using a picture archiving and communication (PACS) system, we generated regions of interest (ROI) of similar size in the body of L1 (excluding the cortex), in line with the publication by Pickhardt et al., and computed the mean values for Hounsfield units (HU). These values were compared against established threshold values which differentiate between osteoporosis and osteopenia; for a balanced sensitivity and specificity, <135 HU is the threshold and for 90% sensitivity a HU threshold of <160 HU is set. Comparisons were also performed between age stratified groups. Results. A total of 187 patients were reviewed for eligibility, 91 patients met the criteria with 53 patients aged 64 years or younger (range 23–64) and 38 patients aged above 65 years (range 65–98). In the younger cohort, 6/53 (11% were osteoporotic, using the lower threshold, while the higher threshold indicated 5/53 (17%) of patients under 65 years were osteoporotic; mean HU for the group was 195.8 (SD 43.3). In the older cohort, 24/38 (63%) were osteoporotic using the lower threshold, whereas 34/38 (89%) were osteoporotic using the higher threshold. Mean HU for the cohort aged over 65 years was 118.7 (SD 38.4). Age based comparison of the mean values, regardless of threshold, was statistically significant (p<0.001) in both cases. Discussion and Conclusions. This study demonstrates, for the first time in the cervical spine (including C2), the role of age related osteoporosis in acute fractures of the cervical spine. This new technique harnessing the presence of opportunistic CT scans of the abdomen saves on the extra cost and radiation exposure that may be associated with DEXA scanning. In younger patients, the higher threshold indicated 17% were osteoporotic – in the setting of an opportunistic scan, this may afford them the opportunity to commence prophylactic treatment to prevent future fractures. We believe these result have the potential to significantly impact future clinical practice

Aims

Osteoporosis and abnormal bone metabolism may prove to be significant factors influencing the outcome of arthroplasty surgery, predisposing to complications of aseptic loosening and peri-prosthetic fracture. We aimed to investigate baseline bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover in patients about to undergo arthroplasty of the hip and knee.

This study investigates the use of porous biphasic ceramics as graft extenders in impaction grafting of the femur during revision hip surgery.

Impaction grafting of the femur was performed in four groups of sheep. Group one received pure allograft, group two 50% allograft and 50% BoneSave, group three 50% allograft and 50% BoneSave type 2 and group four 10% allograft and 90% BoneSave as the graft material. Function was assessed using an index of pre- and post-operative peak vertical ground reaction force ratios. Changes in bone mineral density were measured by dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning. Loosening and subsidence were assessed radiographically and by histological examination of the explanted specimens.

There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups after 18 months of unrestricted functional loading for all outcome measures.

A total of 20 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver femurs were assigned to four alignment groups consisting of relative varus (10° and 20°) and relative valgus (10° and 20°), 75 composite femurs of two neck geometries were also used. In both the cadaver and the composite femurs, placing the component in 20° of valgus resulted in a significant increase in load to failure. Placing the component in 10° of valgus had no appreciable effect on increasing the load to failure except in the composite femurs with varus native femoral necks. Specimens in 10° of varus were significantly weaker than the neutrally-aligned specimens.

The results suggest that retention of the intact proximal femoral strength occurs at an implant angulation of ≥ 142°. However, the benefit of extreme valgus alignment may be outweighed in clinical practice by the risk of superior femoral neck notching, which was avoided in this study.