OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY. The objective of this study is to establish the medium-term clinical and radiological results with the cementless three-dimensional Vektor-Titan stem compared with conventional cementless stem, such as PerFix stem. The latter stem has a double-wedge design with a rounded distal portion for canal filling (Fig. 1). MATERIALS AND METHODS. From July, 2004, to May, 2010, fifty seven Vektor-Titan stems and 150 PerFix stems were implanted for the patients with osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, femoral neck fracture, and rheumatoid arthritis in our hospital. The results were evaluated clinically using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the Merle d’Aubigne and Postel (M&P) scores. Radiographs were analyzed retrospectively. The criteria used for determining loosening were migration or a total radiolucent zone between the prosthesis/bone cement and host bone, wherein the width increased progressively or change of position, i.e., migration or subsidence of the prosthesis. Migration of the socket seen on the radiograph was defined as either the presence of a ≥2-mm position change or rotation. Position changes of the stem seen on the radiograph were defined as the presence of a progressive subsidence of ≥2 mm or change of position, e.g., varus or valgus. The follow-up period was 9.2 ± 2.6 (range, 5.0–14.0) years. RESULTS. One patient had intraoperative femoral shaft fracture and healed by conservative treatment. The mean JOA and M&P scores improved from preoperative 39.3 and 6.8 points to postoperative 90.9 and 17.2 points, respectively. Thigh pain was less frequent for Vektor-Titan stems (Table 1). Radiolucent lines was far less likely to appear for Vektor-Titan stems evaluated by Gruen's zonal analyses (Table 2). On the other hand, there were radiolucent zones of more than 90% in zone 4 with cementless PerFix stems (Table 2). There was no cases of loosening or postoperative infection. Although signs of bone atrophy were found in the proximal femur and the trochanters in 66.7 % of all cases, bone structure was radiologically normal without stress shielding in most cases (Table 2). On the contrary, there was evidence of an even denser bone structure, such as trabeculae, at the tip of the stem and the lateral implant fixation within the greater trochanter in Vektor-Titan stem cases. These findings remained unchanged over observation periods. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The cementless Vektor-Titan stem is made of Ti6AI7Nb, has got the shape of a straight three-dimensional cone. It has a high proximal volume in the form of a three-dimensional taper with longitudinal ribs. This design achieves strong primary fixation in the proximal metaphysis. Radiologically, newly formed trabeculae toward to the stem were indicative of direct biological fixation at the bone-implant interface. Medium-term results with the cementless Vektor-Titan stem show no implant loosening with stable metaphyseal fixation and preservation of bone structure in the proximal femur and the absence of radiolucent zones around the stem compared with conventional cementless stem

Introduction

Adverse Local Tissue Reactions (ALTR) have been reported in association with both wear and corrosion. Tissue reactions have been reported in association with corrosion at CoCr head-CoCr neck, CoCr head-TiAl6V4 neck, and CoCr modular neck on beta-titanium (TMZF) stem junctions. The current abstract reports on 3 cases of ALTR in association with CoCr modular necks on convention titanium (TiAl6V4) stem junctions.

Case 1. A 67 year old male (87 kg, 1.73 m, BMI 29.1) presented with new onset hip irritation 11 months after surgery. Radiographs show no abnormalities. Further investigation revealed the following: ESR = 95, CRP = 5, Cr level = 1.0, Co level = 4.1, leukocyte transformation testing = highly reactive to nickel. Hip aspiration was culture negative with 11,250 wbc. Metal artifact reduction MR showed cystic local reaction in the region of the greater trochanter.

Case 2. A 52 year old male (89 kg, 1.83 m, BMI 26.5) presented with new onset hip irritation 30 months after surgery. Radiographs show no abnormalities. Further investigation revealed the following: ESR = 7, CRP = 5.4, Cr level = 2.1, Co level = 4.8, leukocyte transformation testing = reactive to nickel. Hip aspiration was culture negative with 3995 wbc. Metal artifact reduction MR showed cystic local reaction in the region of the iliopsoas.

Case 3. A 52 year old male (104 kg, 1.85 m, BMI 30.1) presented with new onset hip irritation 26 months after surgery. Radiographs show no abnormalities. Further investigation revealed the following: ESR = 33, CRP = 34.9, Cr level = 1.0, Co level = 3.7, leukocyte transformation testing = no reactivity to any of the biomaterials. Hip aspiration was culture negative with 3,780 wbc. Metal artifact reduction MR showed cystic local reaction in the region of the iliopsoas.

Background. Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has long been the standard treatment for cases in which non-surgical alternatives have failed to improve pain and function in hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Outcomes from THA have improved over time with better surgical techniques and improved implant designs. While conventional neck-sacrificing implants have been associated with favorable outcomes, there is evidence to suggest biomechanical advantages of newer, femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants, including the Corin MiniHip. However, there is a still a gap of knowledge regarding the potential benefits of the MiniHip stem over conventional neck-sacrificing stems in regards to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we investigated the differences between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short-stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.) arthroplasty concerning PROs, and considering the known features of the short stem design, we hypothesized that MiniHip THA would be associated with improved PROs in comparison to a neck-sacrificing implant system. We further sought to investigate gender effects related to MiniHip or conventional stem surgery. Methods. Neck-sacrificing implant patients (n=90, age 57±7.9 years, female=58, male=32) and a matched (matching criteria: follow-up period, BMI, age) cohort group of MiniHip patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years, female: 25, male: 80) reported both pre-operative and post-operative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) at a minimum interval of 6 months post-operatively and up to three years postoperatively. We applied MANCOVA analysis to compare patient-reported outcome subscores from each group using follow-up period as a covariate and employing gender as an additional grouping factor to evaluate gender effects. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05 and Bonferroni corrections were applied to account for multiple comparisons. Results. There was a main effect of time, showing that all HOOS subscores of both groups increased significantly after surgery (p<0.001). There was a main effect of surgery for subscores Symptoms (p=0.038), ADL (p=0.046), and Sports and Recreation (p=0.039). There was a gender effect only for the subscore Symptoms (p=0.007). There were significant time by surgery interactions for HOOS subscores Symptoms (p=0.002), Pain (p=.009), Sports and Recreation (p=0.004), and QOL (p<0.001) subscores. We also observed a significant time by gender interaction effect for all HOOS subscores (p<0.001). Discussion. The interaction effects regarding most HOOS subscores and surgery/implant type indicate an advantage of MiniHip surgery regarding post-operative reported outcomes. The observed results may be due to previously described improved physiological loading and native hip structure preservation with neck-preserving short-stem designs. While longer-term studies are required for further investigation, evidence suggests the MiniHip may provide a significant benefit to primary THA patients. The additional gender/time interaction effect observed in our study highlights the necessity to consider potential sex differences regarding both the potential/expected improvement in PROs from THA and the requirement to account for such differences when designing osteoarthritis outcome studies based on PROs

Introduction:. Significant proximal femoral remodeling occurs after total hip arthroplasty (THA), with regions of bone loss, and regions of hypertrophy. This study compared three implants for changes in femoral bone mineral density over 2 years following primary uncemented hip arthroplasty with a conventional stem (THA), a novel femoral neck-sparing short hip stem (NS-THA), and resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA). Methods:. Seventy-one patients participated in this non-randomized, prospective study. All patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and underwent primary uncemented hip arthroplasty. Dual Energy XRay Absorptomitry (DXA) scans were performed at preoperative, 3–7 days post-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, one, and two years post-op. Using custom 2 cm zones, 19 zones were observed for percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD). Radiographs and Harris Hip scores were obtained at each visit. Results:. Age, gender, and BMI were found to be statistically different with fewer females and lower age in the RHA group, and a lower age in the NS-THA group. In all three groups, regions that were located proximally were shown to be the most susceptible to bone loss. Combined 2 cm zones 1C/7C, 2A/6A, and 2B/6B showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). Bone loss in the proximal regions was 8–10% lower with the femoral neck-sparing short stem, and least in the RHA group, causing little to no BMD loss in proximal regions. Radiographic outcomes and clinical results including Harris Hip scores were equal between the groups. Conclusion:. Consistent with our hypothesis, it was found that hip arthroplasty with a conventional stem resulted in the highest proximal femoral bone loss, and resurfacing arthroplasty was associated with the least bone loss. The femoral neck-sparing short stem ameliorated the bone loss seen with traditional hip arthroplasty, and approximated the bone preservation seen with hip resurfacing. The short stem neck-sparing device may provide some of the benefits of hip resurfacing, but could potentially have wider indications for use

INTRODUCTION. Short femoral stem use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased due to positive short-term clinical and biomechanical success. A neck preserving femoral stem not only preserves proximal bone volume, but preserves the high quality bone of the medial neck. The short stem design allows for less invasive surgical exposure and less invasive violation of the femoral canal (Figure 1). Additionally, it facilitates future revision THA, if needed, with a conventional primary stem. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early clinical outcomes of the Alteon® Neck Preserving Femoral Stem (Exactech, Inc.). METHODS. Forty-nine subjects (25 males, 24 females; mean age: 58.3±7.6 years; mean BMI: 29.8±5.6) from 2 sites underwent primary THA with the Alteon Neck Preserving Femoral Stem. All participants signed the informed consent, and both sites received IRB approval prior to conducting the study. Clinical data outcomes for this study included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), revisions, and subsidence at 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative time points. Subsidence was measured by an independent third party. Student t-tests were used to identify significant mean differences between genders (p<0.05). RESULTS. The means and standard deviations for the HHS and OHS are shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. For patients reaching the 2-year post-operative time point (n=28), the HHS improved by 51.3 points to 96.1 from 44.8 and the OHS improved by 23.0 points to 43.8 from 20.8. There was no significant difference between genders with regard to BMI or post-operative HHS or OHS scores. However, the females were significantly older (61.4 vs. 55.3) and had a significantly lower pre-operative HHS (44.3 vs. 53.5). There were 2 revisions reported, and there was one report of subsidence at 1 year (n=33); zero reports of subsidence at 2 years (n=24). DISCUSSION. The neck preserving femoral stem exhibited positive early clinical results as demonstrated by the marked improvement in functional outcome scores from the pre-operative visit to 2-years post-operative. These 2-year improvements are better than moderate clinically important improvements reported in the literature (40.1 points for HHS). Functional outcomes scores kept improving at the 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative visits. Additional 2-year outcomes data will be incorporated into this dataset as they become available. For the two revisions, one was due to a calcar fracture and one was due to a patient fall. The patient who fell reported weight-bearing pain after the fall at the 1-year post-operative visit and was subsequently revised. Stem movement was documented as a result of the fall; this was the only report of subsidence. SIGNIFICANCE. The neck preserving femoral stem evaluated in this study demonstrated positive early clinical performance with no reports of subsidence (except for one case that was revised due to a fall). This neck preserving stem design is a promising alternative to conventional femoral stems. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction:. In an attempt to reduce stress shielding in the proximal femur multiple new shorter stem design have become available. We investigated the load to fracture of a new polished tapered cemented short stem in comparison to the conventional polished tapered Exeter stem. Method:. A total of forty-two stems, twenty-one short stems and twenty-one conventional stems both with three different offsets were cemented in a composite sawbone model and loaded to fracture. Results:. study showed that femurs will break at a significantly lower load to failure with a shorter compared to conventional length Exeter stem. Conclusion:. This Both standard and short stem design are safe to use as the torque to failure is 7–10 times as much as the torques seen in activities of daily living

Introduction. Femoral neck fracture is a common injury in elderly patients. To restore the activity with an acceptable morbidity and to decrease of mortality, surgical procedures are thought to be superior to conservative treatments. Osteosynthesis with internal fixation for nondisplaced type, and hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement (hip arthroplasties) for displaced type are commonly performed. Cemented arthroplasty has been preferred over non-cemented arthroplasty because of less postoperative pain, better mobility and excellent initial fixation of the implant, especially for osteoporotic and stove-pipe bones. However, pressurizing bone cement may cause cardiorespiratory and vascular complications, and occasionally death, which has been termed as “bone cement implantation syndrome”. To avoid the occurrence of this syndrome, non-cemented implants have been developed. However, most implants with the press fit concepts and flat wedge taper designs have a risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic fracture. Recently, we have employed a non-cemented femoral component, which has a lateral expansion to the proximal body as compared to a conventional hip stem. Because of this shape, which is called a “lateral flare”, this stem provides a physiological loading on both the medial and lateral endosteal surfaces of the femur. This is in contrast to conventional hip stem which prioritizes loading on the medial and metaphyseal /dyaphyseal surfaces of the femur. Moreover, the cross section of this stem is trapezoid with the flat posterior surface. This shape provides the stem with rotational stability along the long axis of the femur, and maximizes loading transfer to the posterior aspect of the proximal femur. These mechanical features avoid the need for aggressive impaction of the stem at the time of insertion. It is necessary to only tap gently to achieve the secure initial implant fixation by a “rest fit”. Thus, this technique reduces the risk of fracture. Patients and methods. We employed this technique using a non-cemented lateral flare design device for displaced femoral neck fractures since 1996. Surgical procedures were performed with posterior approach under the spinal or epidural anesthesia. Full weight bearing ambulation with a walker was allowed on post-op day one. Results and discussion. Since that time, we have had no femoral fracture, no dislocation of the hip, nor severe complications intraoperatively and post operatively. There has been no evidence of radiographic aseptic loosening or axial migration of the stems during this time period. Conclusions. “Rest fit” surgical technique avoids complications associated with cemented and traditional non-cemented arthroplasties for displaced femoral neck fractures. It however requires specific geometric features to be included the designs of the femoral component to assure secure initiate fixation at the time of arthroplasty. Therefore, this lateral flare implants are effective for the treatment of the displaced type of femoral neck fracture

Over the past 10 years, the orthopedic community has witnessed an increased interest in more conservative surgical techniques for hip arthroplasty. During this time, second-generation hip resurfacing and minimally invasive surgery enjoyed extensive marketing attention. After a decade of this renewed interest, both of these methods have met with serious concerns. As hip resurfacing numbers decline, both patients and surgeons are looking for other potentially successful conservative treatments to THA. This search has focused surgeon interest toward short-stem designs. Today, a variety of short-stem implants are available with very little clarification of design rationale, fixation features, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Virtually every major implant company now offers a “short stem,” and now there are a plethora of different designs. It is important to note, however, that not all short stems achieve initial fixation at the same bone interface region. Furthermore, surgical techniques vary greatly, and postoperative radiographic interpretation of short-stem position and fixation need to be carefully scrutinized. The purpose of this paper is to review past, present, and potential future developments of short femoral stems and to present a classification system that can offer guidance when reporting on the many different stem variations. Short Curved neck-sparing stem (JISRF classification 2a). Recently, new designs are following Pipino's Biodynamic stem style of saving the femoral neck. These designs feature a short curved stem that finds its stabilization contact region in the femoral neck and saves considerable bone in the medial calcar region. In addition, the curvature of the stem prevents violation of the lateral trochanteric region. The shorter stem also reduces blood loss by not reaming the femoral canal distally. These style stems generally have a variable stem length between 90 and 135 mm. This might not appear much shorter than conventional cementless stems (110 to 150 mm). However, the shorter curved neck sparing stems penetrate on average 1 to 2 cm less distally in the femoral canal. Short stems have a definite role in modern THA, as greater emphasis is being placed on soft tissue and bone sparing techniques and as refinements continue in the understanding of proximal femoral fixation. Metaphyseal short stems have significantly less surface contact area compared with conventional length stems and as a result, they might have less torsional and axial resistance. Neck-retaining short stems provide additional axial and torsional stability and reduced stress at the implant– bone interface and may be a consideration in the more active patient profile. Bone quality and the patient's physical activity should be considered prior to the selection of short-stem devices. Many short-stem designs have considerably different style features that may alter bone remodeling. Knowing the design and the required technique is vital to fit the device properly to the patient. The variations of short stems available call for caution in their overall use until there is better understanding of how dependent these stems are on individual stem features, bone quality, and surgical techniques. Overall, the authors are cautiously optimistic and continue advocating their selective use

Background. Recent studies indicate the benefits of total hip arthroplasty (THA) by using femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants (March et al 1999). These benefits rely on the preservation of native hip structure and improved physiological loading. However, further investigation is needed to compare the outcome of these implants versus the conventional neck-sacrificing stems particularly assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we have investigated the differences in PROs between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.). We hypothesized higher PROs outcome in patients who received treatment by using neck-preserving implants. Methods. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the pre and post-operative PROs of patients receiving THA treatment by using neck-sacrificing implant (n=90, age 57±7.9 years) and a matched (BMI, age) cohort group of neck-preserving patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years). Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) were using with the follow-up of similar follow up of 412.76 ± 206.98 days (neck sacrificing implant) and 454.63 ± 226.99 days (Neck-Preserving). Multivariate analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney tests were conducted for statistical analyses. Holm-Bonferroni adjusted for multiple comparisons was used with initial significance level of 0.05. Results. Both implants resulted in significant improvement of HOOS Subscores (p<0.001). There was a significant effect of time- surgery interaction (p=0.02). Follow-up HOOS subscores analysis indicated that patients who were treated with neck- preserving stems reported significantly higher Symptoms (p<0.001), Pain (p<0.001), ADL (p=0.011), Sports and Recreation (p=0.011), & QOL (p=0.007) subscores. Conclusion. This study aimed to investigate the short term to medium term outcome of neck-preserving implants. The superior outcome of neck-preserving femoral stems could be a result of more natural physiological loading in femoral cavity and higher retention of bone tissue in femoral neck area. However, further studies are needed to investigate the longer-term outcome of these implants

Background:. For hip prostheses, short stems allow easy insertion and reduce thigh pain risk, and are therefore suitable for Minimally Invasive Surgery. However, clinical outcome depends on sufficient initial fixation in the proximal femoral component. Revelation stems are designed to increase medullary cavity occupancy in the proximal femoral component and allow physiological load transmission within this component. Theoretically, on initial fixation of the proximal part of the stem, fixation remains unaffected by cutting the distal part of the stem. Recently, the Revelation micro MAX stem has become available. In this system, only the distal part of the stem is removed. To prepare for the introduction of this stem, we evaluated its rotational stability by installing it in the femurs of formalin-fixed cadavers. We then evaluated the time course of changes in bone density at the stem circumference and stem position by CT in the first eight patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Subjects and Methods:. Micro MAX stems were inserted into the left femurs of one male and six female cadavers (76 to 95 years of age). A commonly used torque meter was mounted on the stem, and stem fixation was evaluated by the application of clockwise torque of 6 to 12 N-m. Further, in patients, three men and five women (age range 38–83 years, mean 67 years; two cases of femoral head necrosis, two of femoral neck fracture, and four of osteoarthritis of the hip) who underwent surgery with the micro MAX stem from July 2012 to April 2013 were evaluated at 3 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after surgery for stem insertion angle and stem subsidence by CT, and for bone density around the stem by the DEXE method. Results:. Rotational stability of the micro MAX stem in cadaveric femurs was similar to that of the conventionally used Revelation stem. In CT examination after surgery, the micro MAX stem tended to be inserted in a slightly varus position. No evidence of stem subsidence was observed in eight patients, but progression of the varus was seen in one. Bone density in the stem circumference was maintained. Discussion:. Although short stems have a number of advantages, problems with the first fixation might result in loosening. Allowing for the small number of patients and limited range of clinical conditions, our findings suggest that the rotational stability of the micro MAX stem is similar to that of the conventional stem. Postoperative CT measurement indicated that the micro MAX stem tended to be inserted in the varus position, particularly in patients with a large medullary cavity. The micro MAX stem was stable, and no decrease in bone density was seen. As with other short stems, however, care is required to avoid insertion in the varus position in patients with a large medullary cavity. Conclusion:. This investigation identified no problems in initial fixation with the micro MAX stem. Clinical outcomes with this system should be favorable

INTRODUCTION. Wedge femoral stems used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have evolved with modifications including shorter lengths, reduced distal geometries, and modular necks. Unlike fit and fill stems which contact most of the metaphysis, tapered wedge femoral stems are designed to achieve proximal medial/lateral fixation. These single taper, wedge stems have demonstrated positive clinical outcomes. The tapered wedge stem evaluated in this study has further reduced distal geometry to provide a wedge-fit within the metaphysis of the proximal femoral canal for all femur types (Dorr A, B, C). The objective of this study was to evaluate the early clinical outcomes, including femoral stem subsidence, of a tapered wedge femoral stem. METHODS. Fifty subjects (28 males, 22 females; mean age: 64.7±9.7 years; mean BMI: 29.6±4.6) underwent primary THA with a tapered wedge femoral stem. IRB approval was received prior to conducting the study and all participants signed the informed consent. Clinical data outcomes for this study included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), revisions, and subsidence at the 6-week, 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative time points. Femoral stem subsidence was measured by an independent third party. Student t-tests were used to identify significant mean differences between genders (p<0.05). RESULTS. For patients returning for their 2-year post- operative visit (n=42), the HHS improved by 40.7 points to 91.9 from 51.2 and the OHS improved by 23.5 points to 44.6 from 21.1. There was no significant difference between genders with regard to age, BMI, or HHS scores. However, the males had significantly higher pre-operative OHS scores (23.4 vs. 18.2) and 3-month post-operative OHS scores (43.7 vs. 40.3). There were no revisions. There were no observations of femoral stem subsidence at 1 year (n=45) or 2 years (n=40). DISCUSSION. The tapered wedge femoral stem exhibited positive early clinical results as demonstrated by the significant improvement in functional outcome scores from the pre-operative visit to 2-years post-operative. These 2-year improvements are better than moderate clinically important improvements reported in the literature (40.1 points for HHS). Functional outcomes scores continued to improve at the 6-week, 3-month, and 1-year post-operative visits. The 1-year and 2-year outcomes were not significantly different. Additionally, the implant was well fixated as there were no reports of femoral stem subsidence 2 years post-operative. SIGNIFICANCE. The tapered wedge femoral stem evaluated in this study demonstrated positive early clinical performance with no reports of femoral stem subsidence or revisions. This tapered wedge stem design is a promising alternative to conventional femoral stems

Background. The Copeland shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty (CSRA) (Figure1) is a cementless, pegged humeral head surface replacement which has been in clinical use since 1986. The indications for CSRA are more or less the same as conventional stemmed arthroplasty. This procedure can be considered for all patients who require shoulder replacement due to GHJ arthritis resulted from primary or secondary OA, RA, and other variations of inflammatory arthritis. It is also suggested as the first choice option for relatively young patients with post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis (AVN), and instability arthropathy. This observational study reports functional and radiological outcome in CSRA during 4 years follow-up. Methods. 109 consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis (45.9%), rheumatoid arthritis (39.4%), rotator cuff arthropathy (9.2%), and avascular necrosis (5.5%) underwent CSRA. Patients including 68 females (63%) and 41 males (37%) underwent this procedure (63 right-sided and 46 left-sided including 9 bilateral shoulders). The outcome assessment included pain and satisfaction, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Score (CS), and SF-12. Imaging was reviewed for glenoid morphology (Walch classification) (Figure2) and humeral head migration. The average follow-up period was 4 years, (range: 1 to 10 years). Results. Primary OA and RA were the most common underlying pathologies in 45.9% and 39.4% of patients, respectively, followed by RCA (9.2%) and AVN (5.5%). Approximately 89% of arthroplasties were primary and 11% were revisions. Other body joints were affected in 85% of patients and nearly 70% of them had accompanying health conditions and co-morbidities (e.g. heart diseases, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus). A strong correlation found for OSS regarding CS and physical SF-12 subscale. Pain and physical limitation had negative correlation with satisfaction and shoulder-specific tools. Walch type A (68%) and superior HH migration (16.8%) were the commonest radiographic presentations. There was high correlation between migration and physical limitation, pain, satisfaction, OSS, and CS. A significant difference noted for OSS, CS, physical limitation, pain and satisfaction between migration and non-migration groups. Discussion. The CSRA provides pain relief and a good functional outcome in many patients. The main disadvantage is the technical difficult of implanting a glenoid which many surgeons now perceive as being essential in order to gain early pain relief and a better functional outcome. Our results show a predictable relationship between outcome and pathology, with osteoarthritic patients having the most favourable outcome. Glenoid wear and cuff related problems are the major reasons for failure. Improvements in the design and surgical technique to reduce the likelihood of HH migration remain the major challenge. CSRA should be considered the implant of choice in younger patients with osteoarthritis and RA where there is concern over conserving bone stock for future revision. Considering the nature of underlying pathologies it is appropriate to use a combination of generic and shoulder-specific outcome tools

Introduction. The Primoris® femoral stem was designed to preserve bone and maintain normal stress to the proximal femur, thereby minimizing stress-shielding. The implant is anchored in the femoral neck and metaphysis without diaphysial involvement and differs from other neck prothesis by: a) Elliptical shape to fit the inner neck dimensions. b) On top of Ti– porous-coating electrochemically deposited hydroxy apatite (Bonemaster®) c) The surgical technique aims to enhance initial implant stability by compaction of neck and metaphyseal cancellous bone. Objectives. As part of stepwise introduction to monitor bone remodeling, RSA data and clinical results. Methods. A prospective cohort study of 52 patients (Female = 55 years or younger, Male = 65 years or younger) with end stage non inflammatory osteoarthritis and no anatomical abnormality was carried out. Clinical data (HHS score, UCLA, and verbal satisfaction score) were collected regularly and compared with patients who in a previous study had a conventional femoral stem (Bimetric®). Furthermore serial DXA scans and RSA analysis were performed. Results. Two patients were excluded during surgery (one major neck deformity, one insufficient bony support). One neck fracture (not compromising implant stability). One was revised in the follow period (aseptic loosening). The mean HHS score increased from 54 (median) preoperatively to 95 at one year and 95 at two years. These results favourably compared with the Bimetric group. DXA scans revealed no bone loss in femoral diaphysis and minimum bone loss at the area of calcar. RSA revealed stable bone implant bond. Conclusions. The early clinical results are encouraging and favourably comparable to the clinical results with a conventional uncemented femoral implant. As part of the stepwise introduction process this clinical step I study justifies further clinical evaluation before the implant is introduced in a wider population

The use of a cemented implant instead of a spacer has been proposed due to the improved function in comparison with a spacer. Unfortunately the removal of a conventional cemented stem can be challenging. The use of a short cemented stem can overcome this problem. Between July 2011 and May 2013, 10 infected hips were treated with a short cemented stem as a spacer. The infected implants were cemented in 6 cases and cementless in 4 cases. Mean time from index operation was 3 years (range 0 to 8 years). It was the first treatment for infection in all cases. Antibiotic loaded cement and an all-poly cup was used in all cases. The bugs were staph aureus and staph epidermidis in most cases. A Friendly short cemented stem with specific cement restrictor and standard cementing tecnique was used in all cases. This stem has been successfully tested in over 200 patients and approved by TUV to be released on the marked. In all cases, the infection was successfully cured with antibiotics for a period ranging from 3 to 5 months. 2 patients were revised after the infection was cured for recurrent dislocation. No recurrent infection was found at the latest follow up. One stage revision is gaining in popularity for the decreased morbidity and better quality of life of the patients. Weak points of one-stage revision are slightly inferior results in terms of eradication of the infection and the fact that it can be done only with cemented implants. Cemented implants show inferior durability than cementless implants and are difficult to remove if revision is needed. The use of a short cemented stem can couple the advantages of one stage revision and the fact that it is easily removed if this is needed for various reasons (aseptic loosening, recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture). Contraindications to this technique are severe bone loss in the acetabulum or in the proximal femur

Revision knee prostheses are often augmented with intramedullary stems to provide stability following bone loss. However, there are concerns with the use of such stems, including loosening caused by strain-shielding, end-of-stem pain, and removal of healthy bone surrounding the medullary canal. Extracortical fixation plates may present an alternative. The aim of the study was to quantitatively evaluate and compare strain-shielding in the tibia following implantation of a knee replacement component augmented with either a conventional intramedullary stem (design1), or extracortical plates (design2) on the medial and lateral surfaces. Eight composite synthetic tibiae were implanted with one of the two designs, painted with a speckle pattern, loaded in axial compression (peak 2.5 kN) using a materials test machine, and imaged with a 5-megapixel digital image correlation (DIC) system throughout loading. Bone loss was simulated in all models by removing a volume of metaphyseal bone. For four tibiae, the tibial tray was augmented with a cemented stem (∼150 mm). The others were augmented by extracortical plates (maximum 90 mm long) along the medial and lateral surfaces (Fig. 1). Strains were computed using an ARAMIS 5M software system between loaded and unloaded states in the longitudinal direction, for the medial, posterior and lateral surfaces of the tibiae. Strains were checked locally by use of strain gauge rosettes at three levels on medial, lateral and posterior aspects. The bone strains measured on the posterior surfaces were reported in three regions; proximal (0–70 mm, where the medial extracortical plate lies), middle (70–130 mm, the stem is present but not the extracortical plates), and distal (130–200 mm, beyond the stem). Mean longitudinal strains for both implant types were comparable in the distal region, and were greater than in the other regions (Fig 2). The mean strains differed considerably in the middle region: 565–715 μstrain with stemmed components 1050–1155 μstrain with plated components. Strains followed a similar pattern in the proximal region, particularly very close (20 mm) to the tibial tray component, where the stemmed component bones (775 ± 160 μstrain) displayed less surface strain than the plated component bones (1210 ± 180 μstrain). Strain-shielding was observed for both designs. The side plates were shorter than the intramedullary rods, so the region of the bone distal to the plates was not strain-shielded, while the same region was strain-shielded when a stemmed component was implanted. It was also shown that in the region of bone just distal of the tibial tray component, design1 shielded the bone from strain 56% more on average than design2. From these results, it can be speculated that the use of extracortical plate rather than intramedullary stems may lead to improved long-term results of revision TKA, assuming the plates and screws provide adequate stability. The extramedullary fixation system preserves more bone than IM fixation, and has the advantage of allowing use of primary TKA components, cemented over the subframe. Similar components have been developed for the femur

Introduction. Femoral component design is a key part of hip arthroplasty performance. We have previously reported that a hip resurfacing offered functional improved performance over a long stem. However resurfacing is not popular for many reasons, so there is a growing trend towards shorter femoral stems, which have the added benefit of ease of introduction through less invasive incisions. Concern is also developing about the impact of longer stems on lifetime risk of periprosthetic fracture, which should be reduced by the use of a shorter stem. For these reasons, we wanted to know whether a shorter stem offered any functional improvement over a conventional long stem. We surmised that longer stems in hip implants might stiffen the femoral shaft, altering the mechanical properties. Materials and Methods. From our database of over 800 patients who have been tested in the lab, we identified 95 patients with a hip replacement performed on only one side, with no other lower limb co-morbidities, and a control group:. 19 with long stem implant, age 66 ± 14 (LONG). 40 with short stem implant, age 69 ± 9 (SHORT). 26 with resurfacing, age 60 ± 8 (RESURF). 43 healthy control with no history of arthroplasty, age 59 ± 10 (CONTROL). All groups were matched for BMI and gender. Participants were asked to walk on an instrumented treadmill. Initially a 5 minute warm up at 4 km/h, then tests at increasing speed in 0.5 km/h increments. Maximum walking speed was determined by the patients themselves, or when subjects moved from walking to running. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were measured in 20 second intervals at each speed. Features were calculated based on the mean GRF for each trial, and on symmetry measures such as first peak force (heel strike), second peak force (toe-off), the rate at which the foot was loaded and unloaded, and step length. Results. When measured by top walking speed, stemmed implants of either type appear slower than those which do not include the femoral shaft (resurfacing). The latter group walking speed was equal to the control group (Figure 1). When looking at the whole gait cycle at any one speed, no major differences appear in the first or second peak forces (Figure 2 – 5km/h, implanted side compared). When checked for asymmetry, resurfacing patients did not demonstrate any asymmetry between legs, while either stemmed groups demonstrated slight differences between legs in terms of force related features (Figure 3). Discussion. We sought to show if stem length has an impact on top walking speed and asymmetry of gait. This small study contributes to that debate. We could not demonstrate any functional superiority of the short over the long stem, but the short femoral stem seems to transmit load just as well as the longer stem, allowing good load transfer at toe-off, and comparable walking speed. The results stress the advantages of non stemmed implants as published before. Our study adds to the discussion as to whether long stems are still needed in primary arthroplasty

Stress shielding of the proximal femur occurs in stemmed implants. Resurfacing implant does not invade the intramedullary region. We studied the stress patterns in conventional and nonstemmed designs. Methods. FE model geometry was based on standard femur from the international Society of Biomechanics Mesh Repository. Loading simulated for one- legged stance with body weight of 826 N. 2 regions were defined, R1 (40 mm from tip of head) and R2 41 mm–150 mm) of the intramedullary part of the stemmed model's interface with bone. 2 different loading conditions bending and torsion were compared for stress and strain. The FE model was solved with ANSYS version 6.1 on a single processor NT station. Results. With conventional implants, stem shields cortical bone from being loaded. In nonstemmed implants, Von Misses stress contours show a similar distribution as intact bone, transferring loads to the cortical shell but with higher stresses and a maximum displacement of 17.39% higher than that of intact bone. 15–23 mm proximal to R2 and around 110 mm, region of the stem tip, there were higher stress and strain concentrations. Conclusion. Based on simulations, nonstemmed implants provide more physiological loading compared to conventional implants though stress shielding increases in region of the stem in resurfacing implant

Purpose of the study. to verify, after a period of 5 years, that no particular complication overshadows the benefits of a large diameter metal-on-metal articulation in combination with a conventional femoral stem with regard to stability and functional result. Patients and methods. Between October 2003 and May 2005, 100 hips in 99 patients were treated with an uncemented Emeraude stem and a Durom Resurfacing Cup made from cobalt-chrome with high carbon content. Mean age at time of surgery was 60 years. 80 of the operated patients were reviewed after a follow-up of 5 years and two months: the results are expressed according to Merle d'Aubigné and Harris, by means of the UCLA and the WOMAC scores. The radiographs were reviewed by independent observers. The patients underwent a chrome and cobalt test in whole blood. Of the 20 patients lost to follow-up, 13 had died, 1 could no longer be located, 1 had been revised because of a peri-prosthetic fracture and the remaining 5 were unable to show up for the follow-up examination. A telephone interview and the WOMAC did not reveal any complication in their cases. Results. The mean Merle d'Aubigné and Harris scores increase from 9.8 to 16.3 and from 37.4 to 79.9, respectively. The UCLA score improves from 4.2 to 6.5. The corrected WOMAC is 77.2%. But the results after 1 year show a distinct difference between the first 30 patients (Harris score of 58.2) and the subsequent patients (Harris score of 82.4). The radiographic analysis does not show any migration; the observed radiolucencies, whether around the fixation wings or at the level of the surface coating, are not progressive; mean cup inclination is 52°. The mean values for chrome are 1.95 μg/l and for cobalt 2 μg/l. Discussion and conclusion. This study confirms the relevance of this concept with regard to stability (no dislocations) and functional result, and reveals no particular complication. The less good clinical results are to be attributed to the pain previously noted in the first 30 cases, before our technical experience led us to impact an undersized cup in respect to the last used rasp. This technique enables a better centering of the cup, ensures that the latter does not protrude nor expose it to excessive equatorial compression, which seems to cause pain. We have no doubt that it is this technical modification that has spared us the complications that have led some of our colleagues to abandon this type of implant

Purpose. The ultimate goal in total hip arthroplasty is not only to relieve the pain but also to restore original hip joint biomechanics. The average femoral neck-shaft angle(FNSA) in Korean tend to have more varus pattern. Since most of conventional femoral stems have relatively high, single, fixed neck shaft angle, it's not easy to restore vertical and horizontal offset exactly especially in Korean people. This study demonstrates the advantages of dual offset(especially high-offset) stem for restoring original biomechanics of hip joint during the total hip arthroplasty in Korean. Materials and Methods. 180 hips of 155 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using one of the standard(132°) or extended(127°) offset Accolade cementless stems were evaluated retrospectively. Offset of stem was chosen according to the patient's own FNSA in preoperative templating. In a morphometric study, neck-shaft angle of proximal femur, vertical offset and horizontal offset, abductor moment arm were measured on preoperative and postoperative both hip AP radiographs and the differences and correlation of each parameters, between operated hip and original non-operated hip which had no deformity (preoperative ipsilateral or postoperative contralateral hip), were analyzed. Results. The standard stems were used in 34 hips and extended offset stems were used in 146 hips. The FNSA of non-operated hip was an average of 129.8°(127.2°□135.8°) in standard group and mean 125.4°(122.7°□129.9°) in extended offset group. The FNSA of operated hip was an average of 131.6° and 127.1° in each group. In the statistical analysis, there was no significant difference of mean horizontal and abductor moment arm between operated hip and non-operated hip in both groups and the restoration of horizontal offset and abductor moment arm showed(p=0.217, p=0.093) significant positive correlation(R=0.870, R=0.851) to the original value. However, vertical offset was increased an average of 1.4mm in operated hip and there was statistical significance. Restoration of vertical offset showed positive correlation to original value (R=0.845). Conclusion. Dual- or multi-offset stem, especially extended offset stem can provide easy restoration of hip biomechanics and soft tissue tension without significant alteration of leg length especially in Korean with more varus femoral neck compared to Caucacian. Precise radiographic measurements of original hip and application of proper-offset stem should be taken in order to restore ideal hip biomechanics successfully and easily. A use of a proper offset stem can afford to enhance joint stability and implant longevity by improving soft-tissue tension and reducing resultant force, and it will guarantee a successful results after total hip arthroplasty in the aspect of function and longevity

INTRODUCTION. Bone resorption around hip stems, in particular periprosthetic bone loss, is a common observation post-operatively. A number of factors influence the amount of bone loss over time and the mechanical environment following total hip replacement (THR) is important; conventional long stem prostheses have been shown to transfer loads distally, resulting in bone loss of the proximal femur. More conservative, short stems have been recently introduced to attempt to better replicate the physiological load distribution in the femur. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone mineral density (BMD) change over time, in a femur implanted with either a short or a long stem. METHODS. Finite element models of two implants, a short (Minihip, Corin, UK) and long (Metafix, Corin, UK) hip stem were used to simulate bone remodeling under a physiological load condition (stair climbing). The magnitudes and directions of the muscle forces and joint reaction force were obtained from Heller et al (2001, 2005). An unimplanted femur was also simulated. A strain-adaptive remodelling theory (Scannel & Prendergast 2009) was utilised to simulate remodelling in the bone after virtual implantation. COMSOL Multiphysics software was used for the analysis. The strain component of the remodelling stimulus was strain energy density per unit mass. This was calculated in the continuum model from the strain energy density, and apparent density. Bone mass was adapted using a site-specific approach in an attempt to return the local remodelling stimulus to the equilibrium stimulus level (calculated from the unimplanted femur). The minimal inhibitory signal proposed by Frost (1964), was included in the model and described by a ‘lazy zone’, where no bone remodelling occurred. The three dimensional geometry of the femur was constructed from computed tomography data of the donor (female, 44 years old, right side). Elemental bone properties were assigned from the Hounsfield Unit values of the CT scans. The elastic modulus of the bone was assumed to be isotropic and was determined using a relationship to the apparent bone density (Frost 1964, Rho 1995). The Poisson's ratio for the bone regions varied between 0.2 and 0.32 depending on the apparent density of the bone (Stulpner 1997). The period of implantation analysed was 2 years. The muscle forces and joint contact loads applied were ramped linearly from zero to full load over a period of two weeks, representing the estimated post operative rest period of a patient. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The overall percentage BMD change observed for Gruen zones 1 through to 7, were −14%, +4%, +40%, +12%, +4%, 0%, 12% respectively at 2 years for the Minihip. The corresponding overall percentage BMD change observed for Gruen zones 1 through to 7 for the Metafix were −8%, −2%, 18%, 26%, +12%, −9%, −42% respectively (Figure 1,2). CONCLUSIONS. Considerably more bone resorption occurs in Gruen zone 7 with the long stem. Long stem designs distrupt the mechanical environment more than short stems, and lead to a greater bone mineral reduction over time