Results in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) when compared with primary osteoarthritis (OA) are controversial. Different factors like age, THA type or surgical technique may affect outcome. We hypothesized that patients with ON had an increased revision rate compared with OA. We analysed clinical outcome, estimated the survival rate for revision surgery, and their possible risk factors, in two groups of patients. In this retrospective cohort analysis of our prospective database, we assessed 2464 primary THAs implanted between 1989 and 2017. Patients with OA were included in group 1, 2090 hips; and patients with ON in group 2, 374 hips. In group 2 there were more men (p<0.001), patients younger than 60 years old (p<0.001) and with greater physical activity (p<0.001). Patients with lumbar OA (p<0.001) and a radiological acetabular shape type B according to Dorr (p<0.001) were more frequent in group 1. Clinical outcome was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score and radiological analysis included postoperative acetabular and femoral component position and hip reconstruction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of not having revision surgery for different reasons. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors for revision surgery. Clinical improvement was better in the ON at all intervals. There were 90 hips revised, 68 due to loosening or wear, 52 (2.5%) in group 1, and 16 (4.3%) in group 2. Overall, the survival rate for revision surgery for any cause at 22 years was 88.0 % (95% CI, 82-94) in group 1 and 84.1% (95% CI, 69 – 99) in group 2 (p=0.019). Multivariate regression analysis showed that hips with conventional polyethylene (PE), compared with highly-cross linked PEs or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, (p=0.01, Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.12, 95% CI 1.15-3.92), and cups outside the Lewinnek´s safe zone had a higher risk for revision surgery (p<0.001, HR: 2.57, 95% CI 1.69-3.91). Modern highly-cross linked PEs and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings use, and a proper surgical technique improved revision rate in patients undergoing THA due to ON compared with OA

We have undertaken a series of clinical trials over the last 20 years to look at different bearing surface combinations in young adults. We continue to follow these patients well beyond the planned duration of the trials and new information is constantly becoming available. The first trial compared ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-standard-polyethylene. These patients have now been followed for 20 years with significant wear in the polyethylene group but virtually identical revision rates. The second trial ceramic-on-ceramic, cobalt-chrome-on-standard-polyethylene and cobalt-chrome-on-cross-linked-polyethylene. In this group the ceramic-on-ceramic patients have the lowest revision rate; the ceramic-on-polyethylene group demonstrates a lower wear rate than cobalt-chrome-on-polyethylene. The third trial looks at cobalt-chrome versus zirconium on either cross-linked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene. At 10 years there remains no evidence of improved performance from the zirconium surface as compared to cobalt-chrome. The cross-linked polyethylene group is clearly outperforming the conventional polyethylene in terms of wear rate but at 10 years the revision rates remain the same in all groups. Cross liked polyethylene appears to be the major determining factor in prosthetic longevity and appears to be more important than the counter face material

Summary Statement. In young, active patients cementless THR demonstrates excellent prosthetic stability by RSA and outstanding clinical outcomes at 5 years using a tapered titanium femoral stem, crosslinked polyethylene liners and either titanium or tantalum shells. Introduction. Early femoral implant stability is essential to long-term success in total hip replacement. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) provides precise measurements of micromotion of the stem relative to the femur that are otherwise not detectable by routine radiographs. This study characterised micromotion of a tapered, cementless femoral stem and tantalum porous-coated vs. titanium acetabular shells in combination with highly cross-linked UHMWPE or conventional polyethylene liners using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for 5 years following THR. Patients and Methods. This IRB-approved, prospective, double randomised, blinded study, involved 46 patients receiving a primary THR by a single surgeon. Each patient was randomised to receive a titanium (23) (Trilogy, Zimmer) or tantalum (23) (Modular Tantalum shell, Zimmer) uncemented hemispheric shell and either a highly-crosslinked or conventional polyethylene liner. Tantalum RSA markers were implanted in each patient. All patients had a Dorr A or B femoral canal and received a cementless, porous-coated titanium tapered stem (M/L Taper, Zimmer). All final femoral broaches were stable to rotational and longitudinal stress. RSA examinations, Harris Hip, UCLA, WOMAC, SF-12 scores were obtained at 10 days, 6 months, and annually through 5 years. Results. All patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Harris Hip, WOMAC, and SF-12 PCS scores post-operatively. Evaluation of polyethylene wear demonstrated that median penetration measurements were significantly greater in the conventional compared to the HXPLE liner cohorts at 1 year through 5 years follow-up (p<0.003). At 5 years, conventional liners showed 0.38 ± 0.05mm vertical wear whereas HXLPE liners showed 0.08 ± 0.02mm (p<0.003). Evaluation of the femoral stems demonstrated that the rate of subsidence was highest in the first 6 months (0.09mm/yr), with no other detectable motion through 5 years. Two outlying patients had significantly higher stem subsidence values at 6 months (0.7 mm and 1.0mm). One stem stabilised without further subsidence after 6 months (0.7mm), and the other stem stabilised at 1 year (1.5mm). Neither patient has clinical evidence of loosening. Evaluation of acetabular shells demonstrated less median vertical translation in tantalum than titanium shells at each time-point except at 3-years follow-up, however due to large standard errors, there was no significant difference between the two designs (p>0.05). These large standard errors were predominantly caused by two outliers, neither of which had clinical evidence of loosening. Discussion/Conclusion. In this RSA study of young THR patients, cementless tapered femoral stems, highly crosslinked polyethylene liners, and tantalum or titanium acetabular shells all demonstrated excellent performance through 5 years follow-up. Highly crosslinked polyethylene liners demonstrated significantly less wear than conventional liners. The femoral stem showed excellent stability through 5 years, with no clinical or radiologic episodes of failure. The small amount of micromotion seen is less than that previously reported for similar tapered, cementless stems and approaches the accuracy of RSA (0.05mm). Both acetabular shells demonstrated excellent stability with minimal micromotion at 5 years without significant differences in migration. All patients demonstrated significant clinical improvement in pain and function and additional RSA evaluation of these patients is planned

Summary Statement. Wear of total knee replacement (TKR) is a clinical concern. This study demonstrated low-conformity moderately cross-linked-polyethylene fixed bearing TKRs showed lower volumetric wear than conventional-polyethylene curved fixed bearing TKRs highlighting potential improvement in TKR performance through design and material selection. Introduction. Wear of total knee replacement (TKR) continues to be a significant factor in the clinical performance of the implants. Historically, failure due to delamination and fatigue directed implant design towards more conforming implants to reduce contact stress. However, the new generations of more oxidatively-stable polyethylene have improved the long-term mechanical properties of the material, and therefore allowed more flexibility in the bearing design. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of insert conformity and material on the wear performance of a fixed bearing total knee replacement through experimental simulation. Methods. The wear of TKR bearings were investigated using a physiological six station Prosim knee wear simulator (Simulator Solutions, UK). Six samples of each test configuration (Sigma CR fixed bearing knees (DePuy Synthes, UK) were studied, and compared with previously reported data, tested under identical conditions (1, 2). The central axis of the implant was offset from the aligned axes of applied load and tibial rotation to replicate a right knee. High kinematics, under anterior-posterior displacement control was used for this study (3). The lubricant was 25% (v/v) calf serum supplemented with 0.03% (v/v) sodium azide solution in deionised water, as an antibacterial agent, and was changed approximately every 0.33Mc. Wear was assessed gravimetrically and moisture uptake accounted for using unloaded soak controls. Results. The wear rates for the moderately cross-linked inserts (XLK) were significantly lower than the conventional polyethylene (GVF) for all geometries (ANOVA, p<0.05). There was a significant reduction in wear rate as the insert geometry became less conforming for both materials (ANOVA, p<0.05). The wear scars areas were comparable in size and shape between materials, within a geometry group. The size of the wear scar changed with conformity, with the curved inserts showing the largest scars in both anterior-posterior and medial-lateral dimensions, and the flat inserts showing the smallest wear scars. Discussion/Conclusion. The introduction of a moderately cross-linked polyethylene insert was shown to significantly reduce the wear of a fixed bearing total knee replacement compared with a conventional material. There was a trend for reducing wear rate with reducing conformity for both materials, suggesting that reduced conformity results in higher contact pressures and reduced contact area, leading to a reduced surface for wear to occur. Both material and conformity were shown to have a significant impact on the wear of a fixed bearing TKR, and therefore provide opportunity for enhancing wear performance through material and design selection

Hip simulators have been used for ten years to determine the tribological performance of large-head metal-on-metal devices using traditional test conditions. However, the hip simulator protocols were originally developed to test metal-on-polyethylene devices. We have used patient activity data to develop a more physiologically relevant test protocol for metal-on-metal devices. This includes stop/start motion, a more appropriate walking frequency, and alternating kinetic and kinematic profiles.

There has been considerable discussion about the effect of heat treatments on the wear of metal-on-metal cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) devices. Clinical studies have shown a higher rate of wear, levels of metal ions and rates of failure for the heat-treated metal compared to the as-cast metal CoCrMo devices. However, hip simulator studies in vitro under traditional testing conditions have thus far not been able to demonstrate a difference between the wear performance of these implants.

Using a physiologically relevant test protocol, we have shown that heat treatment of metal-on-metal CoCrMo devices adversely affects their wear performance and generates significantly higher wear rates and levels of metal ions than in as-cast metal implants.