Abstract
We have undertaken a series of clinical trials over the last 20 years to look at different bearing surface combinations in young adults. We continue to follow these patients well beyond the planned duration of the trials and new information is constantly becoming available. The first trial compared ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-standard-polyethylene. These patients have now been followed for 20 years with significant wear in the polyethylene group but virtually identical revision rates. The second trial ceramic-on-ceramic, cobalt-chrome-on-standard-polyethylene and cobalt-chrome-on-cross-linked-polyethylene. In this group the ceramic-on-ceramic patients have the lowest revision rate; the ceramic-on-polyethylene group demonstrates a lower wear rate than cobalt-chrome-on-polyethylene. The third trial looks at cobalt-chrome versus zirconium on either cross-linked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene. At 10 years there remains no evidence of improved performance from the zirconium surface as compared to cobalt-chrome. The cross-linked polyethylene group is clearly outperforming the conventional polyethylene in terms of wear rate but at 10 years the revision rates remain the same in all groups. Cross liked polyethylene appears to be the major determining factor in prosthetic longevity and appears to be more important than the counter face material.
