Introduction. The incidence of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population is growing and represents the second most common insufficiency fracture of the femur following fractures around the hip joint. Fixation of fractures in patients with poor bone stock and early mobilisation in feeble and polymorbide patients is challenging. Development of a fixation approach for augmentation of conventional LISS (less invasive stabilization system) plating may result in superior long-term clinical outcomes and enhance safe weight bearing. Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of two different techniques of augmented LISS plating for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur in comparison to
Introduction. The main postoperative complications in fixation of ulna shaft fractures are non-union and implant irritation using currently recommended 3.5-mm locking compression plates. An alternative approach using a combination of two smaller plates in orthogonal configuration has been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a single 3.5-mm locking compression plate versus double plating using one 2.5-mm and one 2.0-mm mandible plate in a human ulna shaft fracture model. Method. Eight pairs human ulnar specimens with a standardized 10-mm fracture gap were pairwise assigned for instrumentation with either a single 3.5-mm plate placed posteriorly, or for double plating using a 2.5-mm and a 2.0-mm mandible plate placed posteriorly under the flexor muscles and laterally under the extensor muscles. All constructs were initially non-destructively biomechanically tested in axial compression, torsion, and bending, which was followed by cyclic torsional loading to failure. Interfragmentary movements were monitored by means of optical motion tracking. Result. There were no significant differences between the two plating techniques for axial stiffness (p=0.335), torsional stiffness in supination (p=0.462), torsional stiffness in pronation (p=0.307), medio-lateral bending stiffness (p=0.522), and antero-posterior bending stiffness (p=0.143). During cyclic torsional loading over the first 3000 cycles, there were no significant differences between the two plating techniques for shear displacement across the fracture gap, p=0.324. The numbers of cycles until clinically relevant failure of 5° angular deformation were 1366±685 for double plating and 2024±958 for single plating, which was statistically non-significantly different, p>0.05. The constructs treated with both plating techniques failed due to bone breakage at the most distal screw. Conclusion. From a biomechanical perspective double plating of ulna shaft fractures using a 2.5-mm and a 2.0-mm locking mandible plate demonstrated equivalent fixation strength as
Locking plates have led to important changes in bone fracture management, allowing flexible biological fracture fixation based on the principle of an internal fixator. The technique of locking plate fixation differs fundamentally from
Introduction and Objective. Distal femoral fractures are commonly treated with a straight plate fixed to the lateral aspects of both proximal and distal fragments. However, the lateral approach may not always be desirable due to persisting soft-tissue or additional vascular injury necessitating a medial approach. These problems may be overcome by pre-contouring the plate in helically shaped fashion, allowing its distal part to be fixed to the medial aspect of the femoral condyle. The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of medial femoral helical
