Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has had rapidly increasingly utilization since its approval for U.S. use in 2004. RTSA accounted for 11% of extremity market procedure growth in 201. Although RTSA is widely used, there remain significant challenges in determining the location and configuration of implants to achieve optimal clinical and functional results. The goal of this study was to measure the 3D position of the shoulder joint center, relative to the center of the native glenoid face, in 16 subjects with RTSA of three different implant designs, and in 12 healthy young shoulders. CT scans of 12 healthy and 16 pre-operative shoulders were segmented to create 3D models of the scapula and humerus. A standardized bone coordinate system was defined for each bone (Figure 1). For healthy shoulders, the location of the humeral head center was measured relative to the glenoid face center. For the RTSA shoulders, a two-step measurement was required. First, 3D models of the pre-operative bones were reconstructed and oriented in the same manner as for healthy shoulders. Second, 3D model-image registration was used to determine the post-operative implant positioning relative to the bones. The 3D position and orientation of the implants and bones were determined in a sequence of six fluoroscopic images of the arm during abduction, and the mean implant-to-bone relationships were used to determine the surgical positioning of the implants (Figure 2). The RTSA center of rotation was defined as the offset from the center of the implant glenosphere to the center of the native glenoid face. The center of rotation in RTSA shoulders varied over a much greater range than the native shoulders (Table 1 (Figure 3)). Lateral offset of the joint center in RTSA shoulders was at least 6 mm smaller than the smallest joint center offset in the healthy shoulders. The center of rotation in RTSA shoulders was significantly more inferior than in healthy shoulders. The range of anterior/posterior placement of the rotation center for RTSA shoulders was bounded by the range for normal shoulders. How to best position RTSA implants for optimal patient outcomes remains a topic of great debate and research interest. We found that the 3D joint center position can vary over a supraphysiologic range in shoulders with RTSA, and that this variation is primarily in the coronal plane. By relating these geometric variations to muscle, shoulder and clinical function, we hope to establish methods and strategies for predictably obtaining the best clinical and functional outcomes for RTSA patients on a per-subject basis

“How does the knee move?” is a question of fundamental importance for treatment of knee injuries and knee replacement design. Unfortunately, we lack unambiguous and comprehensive knee function data sets and/or consensus on how healthy knees move. One can just as easily find reports stating the natural knee has a center of axial rotation in the medial compartment of the knee as in the lateral. This is due to technical and practical issues: It is extremely difficult to accurately measure knee motions during ambulatory activities and, when that can be done, very few studies have examined a range of weightbearing activities in the same study cohort. The purpose of this study is to report knee kinematics in a cohort of healthy older subjects whose motions were examined during four different movements, three of them weightbearing ambulation, using a high-speed stereoradiographic system. Six healthy consenting subjects (age = 61 ± 5 years, body mass = 75 ± 8 kg, BMI = 27 ± 4) were observed using a high-speed stereoradiographic system while completing four tasks. Subjects were instructed to perform an unloaded, seated knee extension from high flexion to full extension; to walk at a self selected pace; to step down from a 7 inch platform; and to walk and perform a 90° direction change (pivoting). Stereoradiographic images (1080 × 1080 pixels) were acquired at 100 images/second using 40cm image intensifiers and pulsed x-ray exposures. The three-dimensional knee kinematics were measured using the XROMM software suite (. xromm.org. , Brown University). Post-processing of the kinematics was performed in custom Matlab programs, and included fitting spheres to the posterior condylar surfaces of each knee, and then tracking the motions of the sphere centers relative to a fixed tibial reference frame (Figure 1). The motions of these flexion-facet centers, were used to determine an average center of axial rotation (CoR) over each activity as previously reported by Banks and Hodge. Average CoRs for all four activities were in the posterior-medial quadrant of the knee, with the CoR for open-chain knee extension being the most medial and gait the most lateral (Table 1, Figure 2). One-way ANOVA showed average CoRs are different (p « 0.001). There was considerable variation in individual CoRs, for example, with two knees showing lateral CoRs for gait and the remaining knees having medial CoRs. It should not be surprising that natural knee motions vary with dynamic activity, yet knee kinematics often are presented as being one stereotypic, monolithic pattern of motion. Our data show that the same healthy subjects performing different dynamic activities manifest different knee motions, with open-chain knee extension having the most medial CoR and gait the most lateral. This finding is consistent with previous reports comparing stair climbing and gait in knees with various implant designs. Additional experimental data and, ultimately, validated numerical simulations should facilitate an increasingly accurate process for designing improved treatments for diseased and damaged knees

Purpose. To determine if clinical outcomes are correlated with center of rotation (COR) in patients implanted with a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). Methods. Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar DDD between L4 and S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial of a VTDR across three surgical centres. A comprehensive, independent review and statistical analysis of both clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed and analyzed for correlations. Data from preoperative through 2 years were available. The COR was calculated for the index levels and compared to data for an asymptomatic population. Each COR coordinate was classified as abnormal if outside of the 95% confidence interval for an asymptomatic population. Results. At most recent follow-up, 69% of the patients had achieved at least a 15 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement. 76% of the patients achieved at least a 10 point improvement. At most recent follow-up, 78% of cases had a normal COR-X and 92% had a normal COR-Y. Results from three statistical tests show the association between COR-X and outcomes. 1) Based on latest available time point for each patient, the improvement in ODI score was significantly better for patients with a normal anterior-posterior (AP) coordinate of the COR (P=0.03). 2) Anterior COR corresponded with anterior placement of the device in the disc space, and patients were almost 7 times less likely to achieve at least a 15 point improvement in the ODI score if the COR was positioned too anteriorly. 3) This effect was also seen in the average AP coordinate of the COR for patients who achieved a 15 point ODI improvement. Conclusions. A viscoelastic TDR can restore a normal COR. This is the first study to show that restoration of a normal COR correlates with a significant and clinically relevant improvement in patient disability

Introduction. Restoration of the femoral head centre during THR should theoretically improve muscle function and soft tissue tension. The aim of this study was to assess whether 3D planning and an accurately controlled neck osteotomy could help recreate hip anatomy. Methods. 100 consecutive THR patients received OPS. TM. 3D femoral planning. For each patient a 3D stem+head position was pre-operatively planned which restored the native head height, restored global offset after cup medialisation and reproduced anterior offset, in the superior-inferior, medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions respectively. The femoral osteotomy was planned preoperatively and controlled intra-operatively with a patient specific guide. All procedures were performed through a posterior approach with a TriFit/Trinity uncemented implant combination. Post-op implant position was determined from CT. Results. The mean difference between planned and achieved head height was 0.9mm (−1.2mm to 4.6mm). The mean difference between planned and achieved medial offset was −0.9mm (−6.2mm to 3.1mm). The mean difference between planned and achieved anterior offset was 3.2mm (−0.4mm to 6.6mm). Resultant 3D change between the planned and achieved head centre was 4.4mm (0.6mm to 9.1mm). The change in anterior offset was strongly correlated (r=0.78) to the change in achieved stem anteversion in comparison to the plan; mean values of 16.3° and 10.5° respectively. Conclusions. In this single centre pilot study, femoral centre of rotation was accurately reproduced by using 3D templating and controlling the femoral neck osteotomy with a patient-specific guide

Purpopse. Few Cervical Total Disc Replacement (TDR) devices are engineered to address both the Center of Balance (COB) and the Center of Rotation (COR) of the cervical motion segments. The COB is the axis in the intervertebral disc through which the axial compressive load is transmitted. TDRs placed posterior of this point tend to fall into kyphosis while devices placed anterior of this point tend to fall into lordosis. Thus from a “balancing” point of view the ideal placement would be at the COB. However, the COR position has been shown to be posterior and inferior to the disc space. It has also been shown that constrained devices tend to lose motion when there is a mismatch between device and anatomic centers. Mobile core devices may be placed at the COB since their unconstrained rotations and translations allow for the device COR to follow the anatomic COR, but they rely heavily on the facet joints and other anatomic features to resist the paradoxiacal motion. The TriLobe cervical TDR (Figure 2) was engineered for both the COB and COR. The purpose of this study was to compare the 3D kinematic and biomechanical performance of the TriLobe to a ball and trough(BT) cervical TDR in an augmented pure moment cadaveric study to find the ideal AP implant placement. Materials and methods. Specimen were CT imaged for three-dimensional reconstruction. Visual, CT, and DEXA screening was utilized to verify that specimens are free from any defects. Specimens were prepared by resecting all nonligamentous soft tissue leaving the facet joint capsules and spinal ligaments intact. C2 and T1 were potted to facilitate mounting in the testing apparatus (7-axis Spine Tester, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT). OptoTRAK motion tracking flags were attached to each vertebra including C2/C3 and T1 to track the 3D motion of each vertebra. •. Specimens C2–T1. •. Treatment Level C5–C6. •. Insertion of fixture pins under fluoro. •. Load Control Testing to 2.5Nm in FE, LB, AR at 0.5Hz. •. 15 Pre-cycles in load control in FE / LB / AR (2.5Nm). •. Test implants in load control in FE / LB / AR to 2.5Nm for 4 cycles with data recorded for all cycles. Results. [Results Table - Figure 1]. Discussion. This study showed that the TriLobe had better control of motion compared to the ball and trough both in ROM and varibility for FE, LB, and AR. The TriLobe had better control of limiting kyphosis over the ball and trough by 41% of the flexion motion. The neutral zone slope, an measure for device stability, showed that the TriLobe was 51% more stable than the BT. AP placement of devices showed there was a general trend of decreasing stability from anterior to posterior placement; however, statistical significance was not established

INTRODUCTION. Accurate knowledge of knee joint kinematics following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is critical for evaluating the functional performance of specific implant designs. Biplane fluoroscopy is currently the most accurate method for measuring 3D knee joint kinematics in vivo during daily activities such as walking. However, the relatively small imaging field of these systems has limited measurement of knee kinematics to only a portion of the gait cycle. We developed a mobile biplane X-ray (MoBiX) fluoroscopy system that enables concurrent tracking and imaging of the knee joint for multiple cycles of overground gait. The primary aim of the present study was to measure 6-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) knee joint kinematics for one complete cycle of overground walking. A secondary aim was to quantify the position of the knee joint centre of rotation (COR) in the transverse plane during TKA gait. METHODS. Ten unilateral posterior-stabilised TKA patients (5 females, 5 males) were recruited to the study. Each subject walked over ground at their self-selected speed (0.93±0.12 m/s). The MoBiX imaging system tracked and recorded biplane X-ray images of the knee, from which tibiofemoral kinematics were calculated using an image processing and pose-estimation pipeline created in MATLAB. Mean 6-DOF tibiofemoral joint kinematics were plotted against the mean knee flexion angle for one complete cycle of overground walking. The joint COR in the transverse plane was calculated as the least squares intersection of the femoral flexion axis projected onto the tibial tray during the stance and swing phases. The femoral and tibial axes and 6-DOF kinematics were defined in accordance with the convention defined by Grood and Suntay in 1983. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The offset in secondary joint motions at a given flexion angle was greater at larger knee flexion angles than at smaller flexion angles for abduction, anterior drawer, and lateral shift, whereas the opposite was true for external rotation. Significant variability was observed between subjects for the COR. The mean COR was on the lateral side during stance, consistent with results reported in the literature for the intact knee. Interestingly, the mean COR was on the medial side during swing. CONCLUSIONS. Our results suggest that secondary joint motions in the TKA knee, specifically, external rotation, abduction, anterior drawer and lateral shift, are determined not only by implant geometry and ligament anatomy but also by external loading, and are therefore task-dependent. The mean COR in the transverse plane shifted from the lateral to the medial side of the knee as the leg transitioned from stance to swing. Mobile dynamic X-ray imaging is a valuable tool for evaluating the functional performance of knee implants during locomotion over ground

The reverse ball and socket shoulder replacement, employing a humeral socket and glenosphere, has revolutionized the treatment of patients with arthritis and rotator cuff insufficiency. The RSP (DjO Surgical, Inc., Austin, Texas) is one such device, characterized by a lateral center of rotation and approved for use in the United States since 2004. Multiple studies by the implant design team have documented excellent outcomes and low revision rates for the RSP, but other published outcomes data are relatively sparse. The objective of this study is to report on the complications and early outcomes in the first consecutive 60 RSPs implanted in 57 patients by a single shoulder replacement surgeon between 2004 and 2010. Forty-four patients were female and mean age at the time of reverse shoulder arthroplasty was 75 years (range 54 to 92 years). The RSP was used as a primary arthroplasty in 42 shoulders and to revise a failed prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty in 18 shoulders. During the study period, 365 shoulder replacements were implanted so that the RSP was used selectively, accounting for only 17% of all shoulder arthroplasties (8.4% for 2004-2007, 24.2% for 2008-2010). Most patients had pseudoparalysis and profound shoulder dysfunction so that mean pre-operative active forward elevation was to 45°, active abduction to 43°, active internal rotation to the buttock, and the mean pre-operative Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score was 1 out of 12. At final follow-up, mean active forward elevation had improved to 101° (p<0.0001), active abduction to 91° (p<0.0001), active internal rotation to the lumbosacral junction (p<0.001), and the mean final SST score was 7 out of 12. There were 16 complications in 14 patients, including 7 reoperations in 6 patients (11%): 3 closed reductions for dislocation, 2 open revisions for instability and for a dissociated liner in the same patient, one evacuation of a hematoma, and one open reduction and internal fixation of a post-operative scapular spine fracture. Two additional scapular spine or acromion fractures and one acromioclavicular joint separation developed postoperatively that impacted outcome adversely but did not require re-operation. None of the glenoid baseplates or humeral stems has been revised and no deep infections have occurred. Experience with reverse shoulder arthroplasty appears to influence the reoperation rate, as 3 of the reoperations occurred following the first 15 reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Overall improvements in active motion and self-assessed shoulder function were comparable to those reported previously. Final active motion results were somewhat lower than those reported previously, which may relate to the selection of predominately pseudoparalytic patients for reverse shoulder arthroplasty in this series. Use of the RSP device for reverse shoulder arthroplasty leads to improved motion and function in carefully selected older patients with pseudoparalysis or a failed shoulder replacement. Re-operations and complications occur but the learning curve may not be as steep as previously reported. This may relate to specific features of the implant system used in this series, as well as to surgeon experience

Introduction. Lateralizing the center of rotation (COR) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has the potential to increase functional outcomes of the procedure, namely adduction range of motion (ROM). However, increased torque at the bone-implant interface as a result of lateralization may provoke early implant loosening, especially in situations where two, rather than four, fixation screws are used. The aim of this study was to utilize finite element (FE) models to investigate the effects of lateralization and the number of fixation screws on micromotion and adduction ROM. Methods. Four patient-specific scapular geometries were developed from CT data in 3D Slicer using a semi-automatic threshold technique. A generic glenoid component including the baseplate, a lateralization spacer, and four fixation screws was modelled as a monoblock. Screws were simplified as 4.5 mm diameter cylinders. The glenoid of each scapula was virtually reamed after which the glenoid component was placed. Models were meshed with quadratic tetrahedral elements with an edge length of 1.3 mm. The baseplate and lateralization spacer were assigned titanium material properties (E = 113.8 GPa and ν = 0.34). Screws were also assigned titanium material properties with a corrected elastic modulus (56.7 GPa) to account for omitted thread geometry. Cortical bone was assigned an elastic modulus of 17.5 GPa and Poisson's ratio of 0.3. Cancellous bone material properties in the region of the glenoid were assigned on an element-by-element basis using previously established equations to convert Hounsfield Units from the CT data to density and subsequently to elastic modulus [1]. Fixed displacement boundary conditions were applied to the medial border of each scapula. Contact was simulated as frictional (μ = 0.8) between bone and screws and frictionless between bone and baseplate/spacer. Compressive and superiorly-oriented shear loads of 686 N were applied to the baseplate/spacer. Lateralization of the COR up to 16 mm was simulated by applying the shear load further from the glenoid surface in 4 mm increments (Fig. 1A). All lateralization levels were simulated with four and two (superior and inferior) fixation screws. Absolute micromotion of the baseplate/spacer with respect to the glenoid surface was averaged across the back surface of the spacer and normalized to the baseline configuration considered to be 0 mm lateralization and four fixation screws. Adduction ROM was measured as the angle between the glenoid surface and the humeral stem when impingement of the humeral cup occurred (Fig. 1B). Results. Lateralization (p = 0.015) and reducing the number of fixation screws (p = 0.008) significantly increased micromotion (Fig. 2). Lateralization significantly increased adduction ROM (p = 0.001). Relationships between lateralization, the number of fixation screws, micromotion, and adduction ROM were shoulder-specific (Fig. 3). Conclusions. Lateralizing the COR of rTSA can improve functional outcomes of the procedure, however may compromise long-term survival of the implant by increasing micromotion. Our results indicate that the trade-offs of lateralizing should be considered on a patient-specific basis, taking into account factors such as quality and availability of bone stock

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) usage is increasing owing to expanded surgical indications, better implant designs, and improved long-term survival. Correct humeral implant positioning has been shown to diminish stem loading in vitro, and radiographic loosening in in the long-term. Replication of the native elbow centre of rotation is thought to restore normal muscle moment arms and has been suggested to improve elbow strength and function. While much of the focus has been on humeral component positioning, little is known about the effect of positioning of the ulnar stem on post-operative range of motion and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the sagittal alignment and positioning of the humeral and ulnar components on the functional outcomes after TEA. Between 2003 and 2016, 173 semi-constrained TEAs (Wright-Tornier Latitude/Latitude EV, Memphis, TN, USA) were performed at our institution, and our preliminary analysis includes 46 elbows in 41 patients (39 female, 7 male). Patients were excluded if they had severe elbow deformity precluding reliable measurement, experienced a major complication related to an ipsilateral upper limb procedure, or underwent revision TEA. For each elbow, saggital alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. A best fit circle of the trochlea and capitellum was drawn, with its centre representing the rotation axis. Ninety degree tangent lines from the intramedullary axes of the ulna and humerus, and from the olecranon tip to the centre of rotation were drawn and measured relative to the rotation axis, representing the ulna posterior offset, humerus offset, and ulna proximal offset, respectively. In addition, we measured the ulna stem angle (angle subtended by the implant and the intramedullary axis of the ulna), as well as radial neck offset (the length of a 90o tangent line from the intramedullary axis of the radial neck and the centre of rotation) in patients with retained or replaced radial heads. Our primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score recorded at the latest follow-up for each patient. Our secondary outcome measures were postoperative flexion, extension, pronation and supination measured at the same timepoints. Each variable was tested for linear correlation with the primary and secondary outcome measures using the Pearson two-tailed test. At an average follow-up of 6.8 years (range 2–14 years), there was a strong positive correlation between anterior radial neck offset and the quickDASH (r=0.60, p=0.001). There was also a weak negative correlation between the posterior offset of the ulnar component and the qDASH (r=0.39, p=0.031), and a moderate positive correlation between the change in humeral offset and elbow supination (r=0.41, p=0.044). The ulna proximal offset and ulna stem angle were not correlated with either the primary, or secondary outcome measures. When performing primary TEA with radial head retention, or replacement, care should be taken to ensure that the ulnar component is correctly positioned such that intramedullary axis of the radial neck lines up with the centre of elbow rotation, as this strongly correlates with better function and less pain after surgery

Background. External fixation for a fracture-dislocation to a joint like the elbow, while maintaining joint mobility is currently done after identifying the center of rotation under X-ray guidance, when applying either a mono-lateral or a circular fixator. Current treatment. using the galaxy fixation system by Orthofix, the surgeon needs to correctly identify the center of rotation of the elbow under X-ray guidance on lateral views. If the center of rotation of the fixator is not aligned with that of the elbow joint, the assembly will not work, i.e. the elbow will be disrupted on trying to achieve flexion or extension movements. Figures (A, B, C and D) summarize the critical steps in identifying the centre of rotation (Courtesy of Orthofix Orthopedics International). New design. This new idea aims to propagate the principle of sliding external fixation applied on the extensor side of a joint, with the limbs of the fixator being able to slide in and out during joint extension and flexion respectively, without hindering the joint movement. Taking the ulno-humeral joint as an example, it is enough to apply the sliding external fixator in line with the subcutaneous border of the ulna, and the pins in the sagital plane, without the need to use x-ray guidance to identify the center of rotation, which simplifies the procedure, and makes it less technically demanding. The sliding external fixator over the elbow involves two bars which accommodate half pins fixation with headless grip screws to hold the pins, identical to the Rancho cubes technique by Smith & Nephew, these slide snugly into sleeves, those sleeves linked together through a hinge behind the elbow, and the bars are spring loaded to the hinge through the inside of the sleeves, which means they will slid into the sleeves in extension and out in flexion. Length of the sleeve should prevent the bars from dislodgement, and the cross section of both the bars and the sleeves have to correspond to each other for the sleeves to accommodate the bars within them and to prevent rotational instability within the construct itself. Summary. Applying an external fixator on the extensor surface is an idea could lead to major changes in external fixation product design, the ulno-humeral joint is taken as an example, and other joints could also be addressed taking in consideration joint size and anatomical structures at risk. The sliding technique makes the application easier, without the need to X-ray guided identification of the center of rotation

Background. Failed ingrowth and subsequent separation of revision acetabular components from the inferior hemi-pelvis constitutes a primary mode of failure in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Few studies have highlighted other techniques than multiple screws and an ischial flange or hook of cages to reinforce the ischiopubic fixation of the acetabular components, nor did any authors report the use of porous metal augments in the ischium and/or pubis to reinforce ischiopubic fixation of the acetabular cup. The aims of this study were to introduce the concept of extended ischiopubic fixation into the ischium and/or pubis during revision total hip arthroplasty [Fig. 2], and to determine the early clinical outcomes and the radiographic outcomes of hips revised with inferior extended fixation. Methods. Patients who underwent revision THA utilizing the surgical technique of extended ischiopubic fixation with porous metal augments secured in the ischium and/or pubis in a single institution from 2014 to 2016 were reviewed. 16 patients were included based on the criteria of minimum 24 months clinical and radiographic follow-up. No patients were lost to follow-up. The median duration of follow-up for the overall population was 37.43 months. The patients' clinical results were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index and Short form (SF)-12 score and satisfaction level based on a scale with five levels at each office visit. All inpatient and outpatient records were examined for complications, including infection, intraoperative fracture, dislocation, postoperative nerve palsy, hematoma, wound complication and/or any subsequent reoperation(s). The vertical and horizontal distances of the center of rotation to the anatomic femoral head and the inclination and anteversion angle of the cup were measured on the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. All the postoperative plain radiographs were reviewed to assess the stability of the components. Results. At the most recent follow-up, 11 (68.8%) patients rated their satisfaction level as “very satisfied” and 4 (25.0%) were “satisfied.” The median HHS improved significantly and the WOMAC global score decreased significantly at the latest follow-up (? 0.001). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were identified. All constructs were considered to have obtained bone ingrowth fixation. The median vertical distance between the latest postoperative center of rotation to the anatomic center of the femoral head improved from 14.7±10.05 mm preoperatively to 6.77±9.14 mm at final follow-up (p=0.002). The median horizontal distance between the latest postoperative center of rotation to the anatomic center of femoral head improved from 6.3±12.07 mm laterally preoperatively to 2.18±6.98 mm medially at the most recent follow-up (p=0.013) postoperatively. The median acetabular cup abduction angle improved from 55.04°±10.11° preoperatively to 44.43°± 5.73° at the most recent follow-up postoperatively (p=0.001). However, there was no difference in the median cup anteversion angles preoperatively (9.15°±5.36°) to postoperatively (9.66°±3.97°) (P=0.535). Conclusions. Early follow-up of patients reconstructed with the technique of extended ischiopubic fixation with porous metal augments demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes, restoration of the center of rotation and adequate biological fixation. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Summary. The mathematical model has proven to be highly accurate in measuring leg length before and after surgery to determine how leg length effects hip joint mechanics. Introduction. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) has been proven to be one of the most concerning problems associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Long-term follow-up studies have documented the presence of LLD having direct correlation with patient dissatisfaction, dislocation, back pain, and early complications. Several researchers sought to minimize limb length discrepancy based on pre-operative radiological templating or intra-operative measurements. While often being a common occurrence in clinical practice to compensate for LLD intra-operatively, the center of rotation of the hip joint has often changes unintentionally due to excessive reaming. Therefore, the clinical importance of LLD is still difficult to solve and remains a concern for clinicians. Objective. The objective of this study is two-fold: (1) use a validated forward-solution hip model to theoretically analyze the effects of LLD, gaining better understanding of mechanisms leading to early complication of THA and poor patient satisfaction and (2) to investigate the effect of the altered center of rotation of the hip joint regardless LLD compensation. Methods. The theoretical mathematical model used in this study has been previously validated using fluoroscopic results from existing implant designs and telemetric devices. The model can be used to theoretically investigate various surgical alignments, approaches, and procedures. In this study, we analyzed LLD and the effects of the altered center of rotation regardless of LLD compensation surgeons made. The simulations were conducted in both swing and stance phase of gait. Results. During swing phase, leg shortening lead to loosening of the hip capsular ligaments and subsequently, variable kinematic patterns. The momentum of the lower leg increased to levels where the ligaments could not properly constrain the hip leading to the femoral head sliding from within the acetabular cup (Figure 1). This piston motion led to decreased contact area and increased contact stress within the cup. Leg lengthening did not yield femoral head sliding but increased joint tension and contact stress. A tight hip may be an influential factor leading to back pain and poor patient satisfaction. During stance phase, leg shortening caused femoral head sliding leading to decreased contact area and an increase in contact stress. Leg lengthening caused an increase in capsular ligaments tension leading to higher stress in the hip joint (Figure 2). Interestingly, when the acetabular cup was superiorized and the surgeon compensated for LLD, thus matching the pre-operative leg length by increasing the neck length of the femoral implant, the contact forces and stresses were marginally increased at heel strike (Figure 3). Conclusion and Discussion. Altering the leg length during surgery can lead to higher contact forces and contact stresses due to tightening the hip joint or increasing likelihood of hip joint separation. Leg shortening often lead to higher stress within the joint. Further assessment must be conducted to develop tools that surgeons can use to ensure post-operative leg length is similar to the pre-operative condition. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

INTRODUCTION. The purpose of TKA is to restore normal kinematics and functioning to diseased knees. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative kinematic data are correlated with minimum one-year outcomes following primary TKA. METHODS. We reviewed data on 185 consecutive primary TKAs in which sensor-embedded tibial trials were used to evaluate kinematic patterns following traditional ligament balancing. Procedures were performed by two board-certified arthroplasty surgeons. The same implant design and surgical approach was used for all knees. Contact locations on the medial and lateral condyles were recorded for each patient at 0°, 45° and 90° of flexion, and full flexion. Vector equations were created by contact locations on the medial and lateral sides and the vector intersections determined the center of rotation between each measurement position. Center of rotation was calculated as the average of vector intersections at 0 to 45°, 45 to 90°, and 90° to full flexion. If the average center of rotation was between 16 and 1000 mm of the contact location on the medial side it was considered a medial pivot knee. Knees were also classified as medial (16 to 200 mm on medial side), lateral (16 to 200 mm on lateral side), translating (> 200 mm medially or laterally), and other (< 16 mm on both medial and lateral sides). The new Knee Society Scoring System (KSSO objective score, KSSS satisfaction score, KSSF function score), the EQ-5D™ Health Status Index, and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Level Score were measured preoperatively and at minimum one-year follow-up (average 20.4 months). RESULTS. Thirty-three TKAs were excluded to eliminate potential bias due to sensor device malfunction, atypical hardware, unresurfaced patella, surgery at a non-study hospital, or early postoperative infection, revision due to aseptic loosening, ipsilateral hip disease, and subsequent neurologic disease or death unrelated to the index TKA, resulting in a final sample size of 152 knees. Twelve (7.9%) patients were lost to follow-up, and two were excluded due to outlier values for average center of rotation. Seventy-five percent of the final sample was female. Mean age and BMI were 63.6 years 33.9, respectively. Average center of rotation ranged from −1017 to 1562 mm with negative signifying the lateral side. Medial pivot knees comprised 40% (55) of the total sample. Sex, age, height, surgeon, implant side, and implant type were unrelated to pivot classification. Patient weight (100.2 vs. 90.9 kg; p = 0.012) and BMI (35.5 vs. 32.8; p = 0.044) were greater in medial pivot knees. Controlling for BMI, KSSO, KSSF, KSSS, EQ5D, UCLA, and pain scores at latest follow-up did not differ in medial and non-medial pivot knees (p ≥ 0.151). The amount of improvement in outcomes from preoperative baseline also did not differ in medial and non-medial pivot knees (p ≥ 0.161). Outcomes did not vary among knees with translating medial, lateral, and other pivots (p ≥ 0.065). DISCUSSION. Our results suggest that a medial pivot kinematic pattern may not be a substantial governor of clinical success

Introduction. Recent literature has shown that RSAs successfully improve pain and functionality, however variability in range of motion and high complication rates persist. Biomechanical studies suggest that tensioning of the deltoid, resulting from deltoid lengthening, improves range of motion by increasing the moment arm. This study aims to provide clinical significance for deltoid tensioning by comparing postoperative range of motion measurements with deltoid length for 93 patients. Methods. Deltoid length measurements were performed radiographically for 93 patients. Measurements were performed on both preoperative and postoperative x-rays in order to assess deltoid lengthening. The deltoid length was measured as the distance from the infeolateral tip of the acromion to the deltoid tuberosity on the humerus for both pre- and post- x-rays. For preoperative center of rotation measurements, the distance extended from the center of humeral head (estimated as radius of best fit circle) to deltoid length line. For postoperative measurements, the distance was from the center of glenosphere implant to deltoid length line. Forward flexion and external rotation was measured for all patients. Results. The average preoperative deltoid length was 154.25 mm while the average postoperative deltoid measurements was 178.93 mm. The average preoperative center of rotation as 21.33 mm and the average postoperative center of rotation measurement was 46.75 mm. There was low correlation between deltoid length and center of rotation with either forward flexion or external rotation or outcome scores. Discussion. Our results suggest that deltoid lengthening does not significantly influence optimizing clinical outcomes for RSAs. Further research is required to determine design parameters and implants positioning to improve RSAs

Glenoid baseplate orientation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) influences clinical outcomes, complications, and failure rates. Novel technologies have been produced to decrease performance heterogeneity of low and high-volume surgeons. This study aimed to determine novice and experienced shoulder surgeon's ability to accurately characterise glenoid component orientation in an intra-operative scenario. Glenoid baseplates were implanted in eight fresh frozen cadavers by novice surgical trainees. Glenoid baseplate version, inclination, augment rotation, and superior-inferior centre of rotation (COR) offset were then measured using in-person visual assessments by novice and experienced shoulder surgeons immediately after implantation. Glenoid orientation parameters were then measured using 3D CT scans with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) by two independent observers. Bland-Altman plots were produced to determine the accuracy of glenoid orientation using standard intraoperative assessment compared to postoperative 3D CT scan results. Visual assessment of glenoid baseplate orientation showed “poor” to “fair” correlation to 3D CT DRR measurements for both novice and experienced surgeon groups for all measured parameters. There was a clinically relevant, large discrepancy between intra-operative visual assessments and 3D CT DRR measurements for all parameters. Errors in visual assessment of up to 19.2 degrees of inclination and 8mm supero-inferior COR offset occurred. Experienced surgeons had greater measurement error than novices for all measured parameters. Intra-operative measurement errors in glenoid placement may reach unacceptable clinical limits. Kinesthetic input during implantation likely improves orientation understanding and has implications for hands-on learning

Introduction. While THA is associated with positive results and long-term improvement in patient quality of life, outcomes are nonetheless associated with adverse events and post-procedural deficits related to discrepancies in leg length (LLD), offset and cup placement. Post-THA errors in these parameters are associated with gait alteration, low back pain and patient dissatisfaction. Such discrepancies often necessitate revision and increasingly lead to medical malpractice litigation. Maintaining accuracy in post-surgical leg length, offset and cup placement during THA is difficult and subject to error. The sensitivity of these factors is highlighted in studies that have shown that a change of as little as 5 degrees of flexion or abduction can induce alterations in leg length of up to several millimeters. Similarly, positioning of implants can alter global and femoral offset, affecting abductor strength, range of motion and overall physical function. Compounding the biochemical issues associated with inaccurate leg length are the costs associated with these deficits. Traditional freehand techniques of managing intra-operative parameters rely on surgeon experience and tissue tensioning to manually place components accurately. These methods, however, are only able to assess leg length and are subject to inaccuracies associated with patient movement or orientation changes during surgery. Mechanical methods of minimizing post-surgical discrepancies have been developed, such as outrigger or caliper devices, although these methods also address leg length only and provide poor feedback regarding offset and center of rotation, therefore providing insufficient data to accurately achieve appropriate post-surgical leg length. Computer-assisted navigation methods provide more data regarding leg length, offset and center of rotation, but are limited by their cumbersome nature and the large capital costs associated with the systems. The Intellijoint HIP. ®. surgical smart tool (Intellijoint Surgical, Inc., Waterloo, ON) is an intra-operative guidance tool that provides surgeons with real time data on leg length, offset and center of rotation, thereby allowing for confident selection of the correct implant in order to ensure appropriate post-surgical biomechanics. The early clinical results from an initial cohort of patients indicate that Intellijoint HIP. ®. is safe and effective. No adverse events were reported in the initial cohort, and the smart tool was able to measure surgical parameters to within 1mm when compared to radiographic measurements. With training cases removed, 100% of cases had a post-procedure leg length discrepancy of less than 5mm. This paper describes the indications, procedural technique and early clinical results of the Intellijoint HIP. ®. smart tool, which offers a safe, accurate and easy-to-use option for hip surgeons to manage leg length, offset and cup position intra-operatively

The history of knee mechanics studies and the evolution of knee arthroplasty design have been well reported through the last decade (e.g. [1],[2]). Through the early 2000's, there was near consensus on the dominant motions occurring in the healthy knee among much of the biomechanics and orthopaedic communities. However, the past decade has seen the application of improved measurement techniques to permit accurate measurement of natural knee motion during activities like walking and running. The results of these studies suggest healthy knee motion is more complex than previously thought, and therefore, design of suitable arthroplasty devices more difficult. The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the knee biomechanics literature before 2008, to present newer studies for walking and running, and to discuss the implications of these findings for the design of knee replacement implants that seek to replicate physiologic knee motions. Many surgeons point to Brantigan and Voshell [3], an anatomic study of over one hundred specimens focusing on the ligamentous and passive stabilizers of the knee, as being an important influence in their thinking about normal knee function. M.A.R. Freeman and colleagues in London claim particular influence from this work, which motivated their extensive series of MR-based knee studies reported in 2000 [4,5,6]. These papers, perhaps more than any others, are responsible for the common impression that knee kinematics are well and simply described as having a ‘medial pivot’ pattern, where the medial condyle remains stationary on the tibial plateau while the lateral condyle translates posteriorly with knee flexion. Indeed, subsequent studies in healthy and arthritic knees during squatting and kneeling [7,8,9] and healthy and ACL-deficient knees during deep knee bends [10,11] show patterns of motion quite similar to those reported by Freeman and coworkers. These studies make a convincing case for how the healthy knee moves during squatting, kneeling and lunging activities. However, these studies are essentially silent on knee motions during ambulatory activities like walking, running and stair-climbing; activities which most agree are critically important to a high-function lifestyle. In 2008 Koo and Andriacchi reported a motion laboratory study of walking in 46 young healthy individuals and found that the stance phase knee center of rotation was LATERAL in 100% of study participants [12]. One year later, Kozanek et al. published a bi-plane fluoroscopy study of healthy knees walking on a treadmill and corroborated the findings of Koo and Andriacchi, i.e. the center of rotation in healthy knees walking was lateral [13]. Isberg et al. published in 2011 a dynamic radiostereometric study of knee motions in healthy, ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees during a weight-bearing flexion-to-extension activity, and showed consistent anterior-to-posterior medial condylar translations with knee extension, accompanied by relatively little lateral condylar translation [14]. Hoshino and Tashman reported in 2012 another dynamic radiostereometric analysis of healthy knees during downhill running and concluded “While the location of the knee rotational axis may be dependent on the specific loading condition, during … walking and running … it is positioned primarily on the lateral side of the joint. ”[15] Finally, Claes et al. reported in late 2013 the detailed anatomy of the anterolateral ligament (ALL), another structure serving to stabilize the lateral knee compartment near extension, roughly in parallel with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) [16]. Studies since 2008 [9,12–16] show knee motions during walking, running and pivoting activities do not fit the “medial pivot” pattern of motion, but rather point to a “lateral pivot” pattern of knee motion consistent with the stabilizing roles of the ACL and ALL. Having a medial center of rotation in flexion and a lateral center of rotation in extension greatly complicates knee arthroplasty design if the goal is to reproduce kinematics approximating those observed in the natural knee. Consistent kinematics having a fixed center of rotation implies joint stabilizing structures or surfaces, not simply articular laxity allowing the knee to move as forces dictate. Thus, a total knee arthroplasty design seeking to reproduce physiologic motions may need to provide distinct means for controlling tibiofemoral motion in both extension and flexion. Recent studies of natural knee motions have made the implant designer's job more difficult!

Lateralization of the reverse arthroplasty may be desirable to more effectively tension the remaining rotator cuff, decrease scapular notching, improve the cosmetic appearance of the shoulder, and improve stability as well as the arc of motion prior to impingement. There are two primary options to lateralise a reverse shoulder arthroplasty: bone graft with a long post (BIO-RSA) vs. using metal. The two metal options generally include a thicker glenosphere or a thicker glenoid baseplate. Potential benefits of a BIO-RSA include lateralization of the glenoid center of rotation but without placing the center of rotation lateral to the prosthetic-bone interface. By maintaining the position of the center of rotation, the shear forces at the prosthesis-bone interface are lessened and are converted to compressive forces which will minimise glenoid failure. Edwards et al. performed a prospective study on a bony increased offset reverse arthroplasty. Among the 18 shoulders in the BIO-RSA group, the incidence of notching was 78% compared to controls 70%. The graft completely incorporated in 12 (67%), partially incorporated in 4 (22%), and failed to incorporate in 2 (11%). Frankle et al. reported on the minimum 5-year follow-up of reverse arthroplasty with a central compression screw and a lateralised glenoid component. The survivorship was 94% at 5 years. There were seven (9%) cases of scapular notching and no patient had glenoid baseplate loosening or baseplate failure. The authors noted that the patients maintained their improved function and radiographic results at a minimum of five years. In summary, lateralisation of the glenosphere is an attractive option to improve the outcome of reverse arthroplasty. Benefits of lateralisation with metal rather than bone graft include elimination of concern over bone graft healing or resorption. In addition, the procedure has the potential to be more precise with the exact offset amount known pre-operatively as well as improved efficiency of the procedure. Preparing the graft takes additional OR time and there is variable quality of the bone graft

Aims. Only a small number of studies exist that report the results of EBM-produced porous coated trabecular titanium cups in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to investigate the patient satisfaction level, clinical function and radiographic outcomes of the patients who underwent THA using an EBM-produced porous coated titanium cup. Patients and Methods. A total of 32 patients who underwent primary THA with using an EBM-produced porous coated titanium cup from five hospitals between May and December, 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Five patients were lost prior to the minimum 6-year follow-up. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed with an average follow-up of 81.48 (range: 77.00–87.00) months. Results. The median HHS and SF-36 scores improved significantly while the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index decreased significantly at the latest follow-up (p<0.001). Eighteen (66.7%) patients rated their satisfaction level as very satisfied, 6 (22.2%) as satisfied, 2 (7.4%) as neutral and 1(3.7%) as dissatisfied. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were identified, including aseptic cup loosening, hip dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, nerve palsy, hematoma. At the latest follow-up, all cups were considered to have achieved fixation via bone ingrowth with three or more of the five signs occurring in the most recent X-ray. However, three cups revealed radiolucent lines with a width of less than 1 mm. These radiolucent lines were distributed in the DeLee-Charnley zone 1 in 1 patient, zone 3 in another patient and the area between zone1 and zone 2 in an additional patient. The latest postoperative centers of rotation were restored nearly to the anatomic center of rotation both vertically and horizontally and the acetabular cups obtained satisfactory orientation postoperatively. Conclusions. The mid-term follow-up of patients who underwent primary THA using EBM-produced porous coated titanium cups demonstrated favorable patient satisfaction, clinical function and adequate biological fixation. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Two critical steps in achieving optimal results and minimizing complications (dislocation, lengthening, and intraoperative fracture) are careful preoperative planning and more recently, the option of intraoperative imaging in order to optimise accurate and reproducible total hip replacement. The important issues to ascertain are relative limb length, offset and center of rotation. It is important to start the case knowing the patient's perception of their limb length. Patient perception is equally important, if not more important, than the radiographic assessment. On the acetabular side, the teardrop should be identified and the amount of reaming necessary to place the inferior margin of the acetabular component adjacent to the tear drop should be noted. Superiorly the amount of exposed metal that is expected to be seen during surgery should be measured in millimeters. Once the key issues of limb length, offset, center of rotation, and acetabular component position relative to the native acetabulum have been confirmed along with the expected sizing of the acetabular and femoral components, it is critical that the operative plan is reproduced at the time of surgery and this can best be consistently performed with the use of intraoperative imaging. Advances in digital imaging now make efficient, cost-effective assessment of hip replacement possible. Embedded software allows accurate confirmation of the preoperative plan intraoperatively when correction of potential errors is easily possible. Such technology is now mature after years of clinical use and studies have confirmed its success in avoiding outliers and achieving optimal results. A pilot study at Washington University demonstrated that intraoperative imaging was able to eliminate outliers for acetabular inclination and anteversion. In addition, the ability to achieve accurate reproduction of femoral offset and limb length within 5mm was three times better with intraoperative imaging (P < 0.001)