The Accolade®TMZF is a taper-wedge cementless metaphyseal coated femoral stem widely utilized from 2002-2012. In recent years, there have been reports of early catastrophic failure of this implant. Establishing a deeper understanding of the rate and causes of revision in patients who developed aseptic failure in stems with documented concerns about high failure rates is critical. Understanding any potential patient or implant factors which are risk factors for failure is important to inform both clinicians and patients. We propose a study to establish the long-term survival of this stem and analyze patients who underwent aseptic revision to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who received a primary total hip arthroplasty with an Accolade® TMZF stem at a high-volume arthroplasty center. The causes and timing of revision surgery were documented and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to minimize loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with use of the Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the overall and aseptic survival rates at final follow-up. Patient and implant factors commonly associated with aseptic failure were extracted and Cox proportional hazards model was used. A consecutive series of 2609 unilateral primary THA patients implanted with an Accolade®TMZF femoral hip stem were included. Mean time from primary surgery was 12.4 years (range 22 days to 19.5 years). Cumulative survival was 96.1% ± 0.2 at final follow-up. One hundred and seven patients underwent revision surgery with aseptic loosening of the femoral component was the most common cause of aseptic failure in this cohort (33/2609, 1.3%). Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure. To our knowledge, this is the largest series representing the longest follow-up of this taper-wedge cementless femoral implant. Despite early concerns, the Accolade® TMZF stem has excellent survivorship in this cohort. Trunnionosis as a recognized cause for revision surgery was rare. Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure

Aim. Despite the availability of numerous tests, the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection (PJI) continues to be complex. Although several studies have suggested that coagulation-related markers, such as D-dimer and fibrinogen, may be promising tools in the diagnosis of prosthetic infections, their role is still controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum D-dimer and fibrinogen in patients with painful total knee replacement. Method. 83 patients with painful total knee replacement and suspected peri-prosthetic infection were included. All patients underwent pre-operative blood tests to evaluate inflammation indices (ESR and CRP) and serum D-Dimer and Fibrinogen levels. The diagnostic performance of the tests was assessed using the ICM definition as the gold standard. The diagnostic accuracy of the D-dimer and fibrinogen was measured by assessing sensitivity, specificity and by calculating the area under the ROC curve. Results. The definition of prosthetic infection based on the ICM criteria has made it possible to classify 40 peri-prosthetic infections and 43 aseptic failures. The mean value of fibrinogen, D-Dimer, VES and PCR observed in patients with prosthetic infection was significantly higher than in patients with aseptic failure [fibrinogen 468 mg / dl vs 331 mg / dl, p <0.001; D-Dimero 2177 ng/mL vs. 875 ng / mL, p <0.005], ESR 49 mm / hr vs 24 mm/h, p <0.001; PCR 25.5 mg /L vs 8.9 mg/L, p <0.001]. The optimal threshold value of the fibrinogen indicative of the presence of infection was 418 mg/dl, with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 88%. The serum concentration of d-dimer greater than 945 ng / ml showed a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 76.7%. Conclusions. Although in this multicenter prospective study we found that serum D-dimer may have significantly higher statistical values in PJI than aseptic failures, its diagnostic power appears however limited when compared with other markers including plasma fibrinogen. Fibrinogen is regularly analyzed before surgery, the evaluation of this marker does not involve additional costs. The diagnostic accuracy appears to be similar to that of classic markers such as the level of PCR and VES. Plasma D-dimer may have a limited value in the diagnosis of PJI unlike plasma fibrinogen which has shown moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. However, in our limited series of cases, both tests cannot be used alone in the diagnosis of infection but could contribute to the diagnosis if contextualized to ves and pcr

Aim. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents the second most common complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Accumulating evidence suggests that up to 20% of aseptic failures are low-grade PJI. However, there is still no single test to reliably diagnose all PJI. In his thesis, Mazzucco emphasized the viscosity differences between normal, osteoarthritic, and rheumatic synovial fluid. Similarly, a recent study by Fu et al. reported significantly lower viscosity in patients with PJI compared to the aseptic failure cohort. The primary aim of our study was to determine whether synovial fluid viscosity is a more reliable diagnostic criterion for PJI compared to the synovial fluid cell count with differential and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Method. We prospectively analyzed the viscosity of synovial fluid samples obtained during TJA of hip and knee joint revision procedures. We sampled 2.5–5 mL of synovial fluid for viscosity measurement. The samples were centrifuged (4 min at 7000 rpm) and the resulting supernatant was immediately transferred into the Ostwald viscometer. Viscosity was derived from the time required for a given volume of synovial fluid to pass the viscometer at 20 °C. The synovial fluid samples were also analysed for their cell count with differential and serum CRP was measured. The definite diagnosis of PJI was established on basis of EBJIS criteria. For the viscosity, the threshold for detecting PJI was set at 65 seconds. Results. Between December 2020 and March 2021, we analyzed 12 knee and 11 hip TJA revision samples. These included 14 septic and 9 aseptic synovial fluid samples. The average viscometer time in the PJI group was 31s (range 20–48s) compared to 247s (range 68–616s) in the group of aseptic revision procedures. The specificity and sensitivity of our viscosity measurements were 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of cell count was 100% and 85.7%, for the synovial fluid differential they were 100% and 85.7%, and for the CRP they were 88.9% and 71.4%, respectively. Conclusions. Our study is the first to report a significant difference in synovial fluid viscosity between the PJI and the aseptic cohort. It points towards the diagnostic superiority of viscosity measurements over conventional synovial fluid cell count, synovial fluid differential, and serum CRP levels. Albeit currently limited by small sample size, the study remains ongoing

Aim. The analysis of synovial fluid has proved to be of crucial importance in the diagnostic process of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), suggesting the presence of an infection before the microbiological culture results. In this context, several studies illustrated the efficacy of synovial calprotectin in supporting the diagnosis of PJI [1, 2]. However, several testing methods have been explored to detect synovial calprotectin levels, emphasizing the need to use a standardized, rapid and rapid test. In this study, synovial calprotectin was analyzed by means of a commercial stool test [3] to explore whether the detected levels might predict PJIs and, therefore, being a promising tool for the fast and reliable diagnosis of this complication. Method. The synovial fluid of 55 patients underwent to revision of the prosthetic implant were analyzed. The measurement of calprotectin was carried out by of commercial stool test, following the protocol for liquid samples. Calprotectin levels were then compared to other synovial biomarkers of PJI such as leucocyte esterase and count and percentage of polymorphonuclear cells. Data analysis were performed using R software v4.1.1 (R Core Team) and package “pROC” [4]. Receiver operator characteristics curves were designed using culture test as gold standard to evaluate the area under curve (AUC) of each method (with DeLong method for confidence-interval calculation). Thresholds were calculated to maximize Youden's index; sensitivity and specificity were reported. One-to-one Pearson's correlations coefficient were calculated for each pair of methods. P value <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. Of the 55 synovial fluids analyzed, 13 patients were diagnosed with PJI and 42 with an aseptic failure of the implant. The specificity, sensitivity, and AUC of calprotectin resulted 0.90, 0.85, and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.72–0.99), respectively with a set threshold of 226.5 µg/g. The values of calprotectin had a moderate and statistically relevant correlation with the synovial leucocyte counts (r. s. = 0.54, p = 0.0003) and the percentage of polymorphonuclear cells (r. s. = 0.68, p = 0.0000). Conclusions. From this analysis, it can be concluded that synovial calprotectin is a valuable biomarker that correlates with other established indicator of local infection, delivering a rapid and reliable results and supporting the diagnostic process of PJI

Aim. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a clinical dilemma, since presentations of PJI usually greatly overlap with aseptic failure (AF). The aim of this study is to evaluate the values of plasma fibrinogen, individually or in combination with CRP, ESR and WBC, for distinguishing PJI from AF. Method. We retrospectively enrolled 357 cases who underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasties in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2013 to December 2021, including 197 AF, 116 PJI and 44 reimplantation. The diagnostic capacity of preoperative fibrinogen, CRP, ESR and WBC as well as their combinations for differentiating PJI from AF were assessed by ROC curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were calculated according to the optimal cutoff value based on the Youden index. All biomarkers were further investigated for their potential ability to predict optimal timing of reimplantation as well as their diagnostic capacity in the subgroups of the knee and hip PJI. Furthermore, the correlations among fibrinogen, CRP and ESR in the patients with PJI and AF were analyzed to further evaluate the potential capacity of fibrinogen in the diagnosis of PJI. Results. The levels of fibrinogen, CRP, ESR and WBC were significantly higher in PJI group than in AF group. ROC analyses showed that the AUCs of fibrinogen, CRP, ESR and WBC were 0.879, 0.903, 0.879 and 0.685, respectively. The optimal threshold of fibrinogen is 4.04 g/L (74.1% sensitivity, 85.6% specificity, 76.1% PPV, 85.0% NPV and 81.8% accuracy). Combining fibrinogen with CRP and/or ESR (AUC: 0.903∼0.914) yielded almost equivalent diagnostic efficiency compared with the combination of CRP and ESR (AUC: 0.910). Besides, fibrinogen yielded AUCs of 0.869 (cutoff: 3.44 g/L) and 0.887 (cutoff: 4.12 g/L) in the hip and knee subgroups, with higher specificity and PPV of 93.1% and 96.1% in the knee PJI. Intriguingly, as for the cases with CRP < 10mg/L and ESR ≧ 30 mm/h, the specificity and NPV of fibrinogen for diagnosing PJI were 92.2% and 83.9%. Conclusions. Plasma fibrinogen is considered as a potential first-line screening marker for PJI detection and timing of reimplantation. As for the patients with an increased ESR but normal CRP, a low fibrinogen level (below 4.04 g/L) is more likely to rule out PJI

Aim. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents the second most frequent complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with up to 20% of low-grade PJI treated as aseptic failure. Sensitive diagnostic criteria have been provided by EBJIS. However, to date there is no single test to reliably diagnose all PJIs. Studies of Mazzucco et al. and Fu et al. suggest that synovial fluid (SF) viscosity could be considered as an important marker for PJI. The primary aim of our study was to determine if SF viscosity is a more reliable diagnostic criterion of PJI than the SF cell count with differential (CCD), and the combined diagnostic value of SF viscosity and CCD. Method. We prospectively analysed the viscosity of SF samples obtained during TJA of hip and knee revisions. We sampled 2.5–5mL of SF for viscosity and CCD. Intraoperatively, 1mL of the sample was analysed for the CCD. The remaining SF was centrifuged for 4min at 7000rpm. The viscosity of the supernatant was determined on Ostwald viscometer as the time required to pass the viscometer at 20°C. During each surgery at least 5 microbiological and multiple histopathological samples were harvested, and explant sonication was performed. The diagnosis was based on EBJIS definition. The viscosity threshold for detecting PJI was set at 65 seconds. Results. Between December 2020 and January 2023, we analysed 65 knee and 47 hip TJA revision procedures. There were 55 septic and 57 aseptic diagnoses. As a diagnostic marker of PJI, SF viscosity achieved 100% sensitivity and 82.5% specificity, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.832 (95% CI 0.739, 0.925). The specificity and sensitivity of SF CCD were 98.2% and 78.2%, respectively, with AUC of 0.921 (95% CI 0.869, 0.974). Of the 10 cases incorrectly diagnosed as aseptic based on SF viscosity, 2 were acute traumas and 8 metalloses. The SF CCD in all these cases was <0.5. Of the 12 cases incorrectly diagnosed as aseptic based on SF CCD, 6 cases were culture negative, 4 C. acnes and 2 S. epidemidis isolates in microbiology. Taken together, SF viscosity and CCD achieved a combined AUC of 0.953 (95% CI 0.919, 0.987). Conclusions. Our study is the first to report that SF viscosity is more sensitive but slightly less specific for PJI than SF CCD. The study demonstrates diagnostic value of combining SF viscosity with CCD in decision making in TJA revision surgery

Aim. Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) can be very challenging, especially infections caused by low virulence microorganisms. No single test with a 100% accuracy is available yet. Hence, different infection definitions were introduced to improve the diagnostic confidence and quality of research articles. Due to constant developments in this field, infection definitions are adopted continuously. The aim of our study was to find the most sensitive currently available infection definition among three currently used criteria (International Consensus Meeting – criteria 2018 (ICM), Infectious Diseases Society of America - criteria 2013 (IDSA), and European Bone and Joint Infection Society – criteria 2021 (EBJIS)) for the diagnosis of PJI. Method. Between 2015 and 2020, patients with an indicated revision surgery due to septic or aseptic failure after a total hip or knee replacement were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A standardized diagnostic workup was done in all patients. The components of the IDSA-, ICM-, and EBJIS- criteria for the diagnosis of PJI were identified in each patient. Results. Overall, 206 patients (hip: n=104 (50%); knee: n=102 (50%)) with a median age of 74 years (IQR 65 – 80y) were included. 101 patients (49%) were diagnosed with PJI when using the EBJIS- criteria. Based on the IDSA- and ICM- criteria, 99 patients (48%, IDSA) and 86 patients (42%, ICM) were classified as septic. Based on all three criteria, 84 cases (41%) had an infection. 15 septic cases (n=15/206; 7%) were only identified by the IDSA- and EBJIS- criteria. In 2 patients (n=2/206, 1%), an infection was present based on only the ICM and EBJIS criteria. No case was classified as infected by one infection definition alone. A statistically significant higher number of inconclusive cases was observed when the ICM criteria (n=30/206; 15%) were used in comparison to the EBJIS criteria (likely infections: n=16/206; 8%) (Fisher's exact test, p=0.041). The EBJIS definition showed a better preoperative performance in comparison to the other two definitions (p<0.0001). Conclusions. The most sensitive infection definition seems to be the novel EBJIS– criteria covering all infections diagnosed by the IDSA- and ICM-criteria without detecting any further infection. In addition, less inconclusive (infection likely) cases were detected by the EBJIS-criteria in comparison with the ICM-criteria reducing the so called ‘grey zone’ significantly which is of utmost importance in clinical routine

Aim. Clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection remains one of the goals of modern orthopaedic surgery. New diagnostic methods can provide more precise evaluation of the etiology of prosthetic joint failure. With the introduction of sonication an increasing number of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection were detected. The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were preoperatively evaluated as aseptic failure. Method. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for presumed aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologically evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced. Results. Between October 2010 and till the end of 2014 151 cases were operated (38 revision knee arthroplasty, 113 revision hip arthroplasty). 40 (26,5%) cases had positive sonication and negative periprosthetic tissue samples (knee 7 cases, hips 33 cases), 13 (8,6%) cases had positive tissue samples but negative sonication (knee 7 cases, hips 6 cases), in 13 (8,6%) cases both tests were positive (knee none, hips 13 cases) and in 85 (56,3%) cases all microbiologic tests were negative (knee 24 cases, hips 61 cases). In both groups cases coagulase-negative staphylococci and P.acnes were most common, followed by mixed flora. Conclusions. With the increasing number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty, a clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection is crucial for the optimal treatment. Sonication of explanted material is more successful in the isolation of pathogens compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures. Sonication of explanted prosthetic material is helpful in the detection of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections

Aim. The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were pre-operatively evaluated as aseptic failure. Method. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for presumed aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologicaly evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced. Results. Between October 2010 and June 2016 265 cases were operated as aseptic loosenings (66 revision knee arthroplasty, 199 revision hip arthroplasty). 69 (26,0%) cases had positive sonication and negative periprosthetic tissue sample, 24 (9,1%) cases had positive tissue samples, but negative sonication, in 27 (10,2%) cases both tests were positive and in 145 (54,7%) cases all microbiologic tests were negative. In both groups coagulase-negative staphylococci and P.acnes were most common, followed by mixed flora. Conclusions. With the increasing number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty, a clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection is crucial for the optimal treatment. Sonication of explanted material is more successful in the isolation of pathogens compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures. Sonication of explanted prosthetic material is helpful in the detection of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections

Aim. A large body of evidence is emerging to implicate that dysregulation of the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) increases the risk of surgical site infections. Gut dysbiosis is known to occur in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing for translocation of bacteria across the inflamed and highly permeable intestinal mucosal wall. The null hypothesis was that IBD was not associated with increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Our aim was to investigate whether a prior diagnosis of IBD was associated with a higher risk of PJI following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Method. A matched cohort study was designed. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of PJI at 2-year. Secondary endpoints were aseptic revisions, as well as discharge to rehab facility, complications up to 30 days, and readmission up to 90 days after TJA. ICD-9 and −10 codes were used to identify patients with IBD and the control cohort. A chart review was performed to confirm diagnosis of IBD. Using our institutional database, 154 patients with IBD were identified and matched (3 to 1) for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), year of surgery, and joint affected with 462 individuals without IBD undergoing TJA. Results. The cumulative incidence of PJI was 4.55% among patients with IBD versus 1.32% among the control cohort (p=0.024). When bivariate logistic regression was performed, a diagnosis of IBD was found to be an independent risk factor for PJI (OR 3.56 95% C.I. 1.17 – 11.23; p=0.024) and aseptic revisions (OR 3.47, 95% C.I. 1.30 – 3.47; p=0.012). The rate of postoperative complications was also higher in patients with IBD. Conclusions. Based on the findings of this study, it appears that patients with IBD are at higher risk for failure due to PJI or aseptic loosening after TJA. The exact reason for this finding is not known but could be related to the bacterial translocation from the inflamed intestinal mucosa, the dysregulated inflammatory status of these patients, malnutrition, and potentially other factors. Some of the so-called aseptic failures maybe also as a result of infection that may have escaped detection and/or recognition

Aim. The cut-off values for synovial fluid leukocyte count and neutrophils differential (%PMN) for differentiating aseptic from septic failure in total knee arthroplasties were already defined in the past. Our goal was to determine the cut-off values for synovial fluid leukocyte count and %PMN in failed total hip arthroplasties (THA). Method. Patients undergoing revision THA were prospectively included. In perioperative assessment phase, synovial fluid leukocyte count and %PMN were determined. During the surgery, at least 4 intraoperative samples for microbiological and one for histopathological analysis were obtained. Infection was defined as presence of sinus tract, inflammation in histopathological samples, and ≥2 tissue and/or synovial fluid samples growing the same microorganism. Exclusion criteria were systemic inflammatory diseases, revision surgery performed less than 3 months from index surgery and insufficient tissue sampling. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic performance and Youden's J statistic was computed to identify optimal cut-off values. Results. During the study period (between June 2006 and June 2011) 227 revision THAs were performed by the senior author. 31 patients were excluded. 196 patients (mean age, 69 years; 68% females) with THA failure were included. Aseptic failure was diagnosed in 150 patients (76,5%) and THA infection was diagnosed in 46 patients (23,5%). Synovial fluid leukocyte counts were significantly higher in the infected group (median, 5.50×10. 6. leukocytes/ml range, 0.05 to 143.9×10. 6. leukocytes/mL) than in the aseptic group (median, 0.23×10. 6. cells/ml; range, 0 to 21.3×10. 6. leukocytes/ml, P<0,0001). The %PMN was also significantly higher in the infected group (median, 83%; range, 6% to 97%) than in the aseptic group (median, 27,5%; range, 0% to 94%, P<0,0001). A synovial fluid leukocyte count of > 1.54×10. 6. leukocytes/ml, had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 95%, positive and negative predictive values of 78% and 89%, respectively. A synovial fluid %PMN of > 64%, had a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 93%, positive and negative predictive values of 73% and 90%, respectively. Conclusion. The synovial fluid leukocyte count of > 1.54×10. 6. leukocytes/ml and %PMN of > 64% are useful and reliable tests for excluding THA infection, having a negative predictive value of around 90%. This tests and calculated cut-off values are highly recommended in the diagnostic process of failed THAs

Clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection remains one of the goals of modern orthopaedic surgery. The development of new diagnostic methods enabled more precise evaluation of the etiology of prosthetic joint failure. With the introduction of sonication an increasing number of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection were detected. The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were preoperatively evaluated as aseptic failure. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologicaly evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced. Between October 2010 and April 2013 54 patients were operated (12 revision knee arthroplasty, 42 revision hip arthroplasty). 10 (18,6%) patients had positive sonication and negative periprosthetic tissue sample, 5 (9,2%) patients had positive tissue samples, but negative sonication, in 9 (16,7%) patients both tests were positive and in 30 (55,5%) patients all microbiologic tests were negative. The microbiologic isolates of sonicate fluid were in 12 cases coagulase-negative staphylococci, in 3 cases P.acnes in 3 cases mixed flora, in 1 case enterococcus and in 1 case SA. From periprosthetic tissue cultures 5 samples have yielded coagulase-negative staphylococci in 5 cases P.acnes in 2 cases mixed flora, in 1 case enterococcus and in 1 case SA were isolated. With the increasing number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty, a clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection is crucial for the optimal treatment. Sonication of explanted material is more successful in the isolation of pathogens compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures. Sonication of explanted prosthetic material is helpful in the detection of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections

Aim. Mega-endoprosthesis over the last two decades have played a significant role in management of non-neoplastic cases for limb salvage for a variety of indications involving bone loss, infection, fracture and failed revision surgery. This is a retrospective case control study comparing outcomes of Mega-Endoprosthesis (MEP) in non-neoplastic cases with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), with previous history of PJI and aseptic revision. Failure was defined as persistence/recurrence of infection, all cause revision, and antibiotic suppression during the follow up period. Secondary aims were identification of causative organisms, resistance profile and causative factors for revision surgery. Method. A total of 122 patients undergoing 133 MEPs were identified between January 2012 and December 2020. 60 procedures were categorised as group 1 (infection; 50%), 20 as group 2 (previous history of infection; 16.7%), and 53 controls (no infection; 44.2%). Mean age of the cohort was 70.97 years (37.16–94.17), with a mean follow-up of 44.5 months (0.2–179) including patients lost to follow up. Results. Overall failure rate was 71/133 53.3% (group 1 39/60 (55.56%), group 2 12/20 (60%) and controls 20/53 (37.7%)). Thirteen patients died in the first 2 years (five in group 1, one in group 2 & seven in controls). The most common postoperative infection was polymicrobial followed by Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus Species (CoNS) and Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Nineteen patients had polymicrobial PJI (Eighteen in group 1 and one in control). CoNS led to postoperative infection in Fifteen patients (six in group 1, five in group 2 and four in control group). MSSA was the pathogen in four patients (three in group-1 and one in the control group). The same organisms were responsible for recurrent infection in fourteen patients in group 1 and one patient in group 2. Limb salvage was achieved in 96.2% overall (95% group 1, 90% group 2, 100% control group). Conclusions. MEPs in the context of PJI have a significant risk of failure however they play an important role in limb salvage. Patients should be counselled appropriately prior to surgery

Aim. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains a serious clinical challenge. Nowadays, limited biomarkers associated with PJI are available. We investigated therefore the utility of gene expression pattern of Toll-like receptors (TLR) and members of interleukin (IL)1/IL1R family, molecules critically involved in the innate immune response to invading pathogens, for detecting PJI in periprosthetic tissues around TJA. Method. Periprosthetic tissues were collected from 37 patients presenting with PJI and 39 patients having an aseptic failure of TJA. mRNA expression of known TLR receptors (TLR1–10) and 21 members of IL-1/IL-1R family was investigated using an innovative Smartchip Real-Time RT-PCR System. *. ; the data were normalized relative to the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism. **. and bio-data mining methods. Results. In PJI, elevated mRNA expression levels of TLR1 (P=0.03), TLR4 (P=0.01) and TLR6 (P=0.01) were detected when compared to tissues from aseptic cases. On the contrary, lower mRNA expression of TLR3 (P=0.04) and TLR7 (P=0.047) were detected in PJI than in aseptic loosening. From IL1/IL-1R family, PJI was associated with elevated levels of IL1β (P=0.0004), IL1RN (P=0.05), IL1R1 (P=0.04), IL1R2 (P=0.01), and IL18RAP (P=0.02) comparing to aseptic failure. Multivariate analysis and sophisticated bio-data mining analysis are ongoing to determine the potential of TLRs and IL1/IL1R family as biomarkers of PJI in TJA. Conclusions. Tissue expression of TLRs and IL1/IL-1R family differ in terms of pattern and expression level between septic and aseptic failure of TJA. Our data support the potential of “innate gene” expression panel as candidate biomarker for assessment of PJI. Further studies are required to replicate our data and also to enable valid interpretation of our findings. Grant support: AZV MZ CR VES15-27726A, VES16-131852A, IGA LF UP_2016_011

Recent introduction of short femoral implants has produced inconsistent outcomes. There have been reports of early aseptic failure as high as 30% within 2 years of implantation. This is in spite of the fact that these short components are shortened versions of existing successful non-cemented designs. The mode of initial fixation in non-cemented implants has been investigated. It has been demonstrated that long term survivability is dependent upon osseous integration; and that osseous integration requires secure initial implant fixation. Traditional non-cemented implants achieve initial fixation analogous to that of a nail in a piece of wood: friction and displacement (with resultant hoop stress). Initial fixation, of a traditional non-cemented femoral component, is directly proportional to surface area contact between the implant and endosteal bone and/or three point fixation. By reducing stem length, contact area may be significantly reduced, thereby increasing stresses over a smaller area of contact. The result of this is to potentially compromise fixation/implant stability against micromotion occurring in the early post-operative period. These stresses are most poorly resisted in flexion/extension and rotational planes about the long axis of the femur. In addition, force applied in an attempt to achieve initial fixation with a short stem may lead to an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture at the time of implantation. We propose that there is an alternative mode of initial fixation, a “rest fit”, that may avoid both the risk of femoral fracture as well as provide better initial implant stability. To assure a maximal initial fixation and resistance to post-operative stresses which may compromise initial implant stability and osseous integration, a short implant should have three distinct geometric features: a medial and lateral flare, a flat posterior surface and a proximal trapezoidal cross section. The first will provide stability against subsidence and varus migration, by resting upon the proximal femur. A flat posterior surface will maximize load transmission to the femur in flexon/extension activities; and an asymmetrical proximal cross-section will provide resistance against rotational stresses about the long axis of the femur during activities such as stairclimbing. Together these features have been throproughly evaluated by FEA and in vitro testing. We are reporting on the shoprt term follow up (2.5 years avg.) first 300 short stems which have employed a “rest fit”. There have been no aseptic failures or revisions for mechanical failure of these implants

Background. The main reasons for hip prosthesis failure are aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The real frequency of PJI is probably largely underestimated because of non-standardized definition criteria, diagnostic procedure, treatment algorithm and other confounders. Therefore, data from joint registries are not reflecting the frequency of PJI and can be misleading; particularly low-grade PJI can be frequently misdiagnosed as aseptic failure. Therefore, prospective clinical studies with standardized protocol, comprehensive diagnostic procedure and sufficient follow-up should be performed. Sonication of explanted prosthesis is highly sensitive for detection of biofilms on prosthetic surface and allows quantitative analysis of biofilm formation. We hypothesize that by using sonication, ceramic components (BIOLOX®delta, BIOLOX®forte) will show higher resistance against biofilm adhesion compared to polyethylene (PE) and metal (CoCrMo). Methods. In this prospective multicentre study (level of evidence: Ia), we included all consecutive adults ≥18 years of age, who underwent explantation of the hip prosthesis for infection or aseptic reason. Excluded were patients in whom part of the prosthetic components were retained. A standardized and comprehensive diagnostic algorithm was applied, including sonication of all removed prosthetic components for qualitative and quantitative microbiological analysis (ultrasound bath 40 kHz, 1 W/cm2, 1 min). Individual components (metal, PE, ceramic) were separately placed in sterile boxes for investigation. All patients were simultaneously included in the European Prosthetic joint infection cohort (EPJIC, . www.epjic.org. ) to ensure long-term follow-up. Results. Up to date, 79 patients were included, of whom 47 (60%) were diagnosed with aseptic failure and 32 (40%) with PJI. Mean age was 73 years (27–87 years), 32 (41%) were males. Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics. In 32 patients with PJI, most frequently isolated organisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=12, 38%), Staphylococcus aureus (n=7, 22%) and Propionibacterium acnes (n=4, 13%), followed by enterococci (n=2; 6%) and gram-negative bacilli (n=2; 6%); 2 infections (6%) were polymicrobial and 3 were culture-negative (9%). Table 2 summarizes the microbiological results from sonication of removed components. Causative microorganism could be detected in sonication fluid from polyethylene in 100%, from metal in 92% and from ceramic in 69%. Significantly lower bacterial counts expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) were detected in sonication fluid from ceramic components (230 CFU/ml) than from PE (6’250 CFU/ml) and metal components (5’870 CFU / ml) (p < 0.01). Conclusions. These first results support the hypothesis that significantly less biofilm biomass is formed on ceramic surface, compared to PE and metal surfaces, potentially indicating higher ceramic “resistance” against bacterial adhesion. These findings should be confirmed with non-microbiological investigation such as imaging (fluorescent in situ hybridization, confocal laser scanning or electron microscopy). Furthermore, in 6 of 32 patients (19%) with PJI, an aseptic loosening was preoperatively suspected. Infection was found only by systematic application of an optimized diagnostic method, particularly sonication of the removed implant. Final study results are expected to be available by the end of 2016

We describe the association between post-operative femoral stem radiological appearances and aseptic failure of THA (total hip arthroplasty) following a retrospective review of records and radiographs of all patients attending for follow-up between August 2002 and August 2003 who had a cemented Charnley femoral stem and either a cemented polyethylene acetabular cup inserted. Femoral stem aseptic loosening was defined either by findings at revision surgery, the definite radiographic loosening criteria of Harris or progressive endosteal cavitation across zones as described by Gruen. Well-fixed control THAs were defined as those that demonstrated none of the radiographic features of aseptic loosening or ‘at risk’ signs as described by Wroblewski. Parameters measured were: Alignment, Barrack grade of cementation, cement mantle width of the cement mantle and the presence and width of any radiolucent lines. Sixty-three hips were entered into the aseptic failure group and 138 into the control group. The alignment of the femoral stem was not associated with failure (p=0.283). Thickness of the cement mantle was statistically associated with failure in Gruen zones 6 (p=0.040) and Gruen zone 7 (p=0.003). A significant association for the presence of radiolucent lines was found for Gruen zones 3 (p=0.0001) and 5 (p=0.0001). The grade of cementation as measured by the Barrack grade was strongly associated with failure for grades C (p=0.001) and D (p=0.001). This study has demonstrated that easily applied radiological criteria can be used to identify ‘at risk’ Charnley THAs from the immediate post-operative AP radiograph

The Osteoprotegerin/RANK/RANKL system has been implicated in the biological cascade of events initiated by particulate wear debris and bacterial infection resulting in periprosthetic bone loss around loosened total hip arthroplasties (THA). Individual responses to such stimuli may be dictated by genetic variation and we have studied the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within these genes. We performed a case control study of the Osteoprotegerin, RANK and RANKL genes for possible association with deep sepsis or aseptic loosening. All patients included in the study were Caucasian and had had a cemented Charnley THA and polyethylene acetabular cup. Cases consisted of 91 patients with early aseptic loosening and 71 patients with microbiological evidence at surgery of deep infection. Controls consisted of 150 THAs that were clinically asymptomatic for over 10 years and demonstrated no radiographic features of aseptic loosening. DNA samples from all individuals were genotyped using Taqman allelic discrimination. The A allele (p<0.001) and homozygous genotype A/A (p<0.001) for the OPG-163 SNP were highly associated with aseptic failure. Additionally, the RANK-575 (C/T SNP) T allele (p=0.004) and T/T genotype (p=0.008) frequencies were associated with aseptic failure. No statistically significant relationship was found between aseptic loosening and the OPG- 245 or OPG-1181 SNPs. When the septic group was compared to controls, the frequency of the A allele (p<0.001) and homozygous genotype A/A (p<0.001) for the OPG-163 SNP were statistically significant. No statistically significant relationship was found between septic failure and the OPG- 245, OPG-1181 or RANK-575 SNPs. Aseptic loosening and possibly deep infection of THA may be under genetic influence to candidate susceptibility genes. SNP markers may serve as predictors of implant survival and aid pharmacogenomic prevention of THA failure

Aim. What is the fate of revision total joint arthroplasty, when conventional tissue sample culture (TSC) is negative and sonication fluid culture (SFC) is positive, in terms of re-revision?. Method. We prospectively analyzed explanted prosthetic materials from 211 consecutive cases of total hip and knee arthroplasty revision surgery performed on any indication during a one year period. We used a sonication apparatus and protocol that was previously described [Borens et al, 2013. J Orthop Res]. Sampling of five periprosthetic tissue biopsies was performed according to the local protocol and incubated for 5 days. In our non-interventional study design, clinicians were blinded to the results from sonication-culture, which were not used for the subsequent treatment strategy. In cases with suspected deep infection, thorough debridement was performed during revision surgery, and routine antibiotic treatment was dicloxacillin for 6–8 weeks. Patients were routinely seen in the outpatient clinic after 3 and 12 months, where clinical examination and any antibiotic treatment were documented. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. This cohort study is reported according to the STROBE guidelines. Results. Microbial findings in TSC and SFC were similar in 41/211 cases. Additional 11/211 cases were identified with positive SFC, despite negative in conventional culture. Of these, 8/11 cases with suspected prosthetic joint infection (PJI) a strategy of revision and empirical antibiotic therapy was completed. Another 3/11 cases with suspected aseptic failure, partial 1-stage revisions were performed with no subsequent antibiotic therapy. Re-revisions were necessary in 5/11 cases of expected PJI, and 2/11 of these ended up with permanent Girdlestone status. A strategy of antibiotic suppression was implemented in 1/11 case. Another 1/11 patient diseased in circulatory failure 4 days after 2nd stage operation. In 3/11 cases the painful joint prosthesis is still unsolved after 1 year, and only 1/11 case had an asymptomatic prosthesis at follow-up after 1 year. Culture results of the subsequent revisions in this small cohort shows several links to the microbiological findings in SFC. Conclusions. We identified 11/211 revisions of total joint arthroplasty, where conventional TSC was negative and SFC was positive. The fate of these cases included re-revision in 5/11. From a clinical perspective, patients with additional microbial findings by SFC had a discouraging prognosis and may represent true positive findings that have to be taken into consideration in the infection treatment

The PFC Sigma Cobalt Chrome Sigma (PFCSCC) was introduced in 2006, an update of the PFC Sigma designed to reduce backside wear. To help identify any significant early failures following its introduction, we prospectively identified all recipients over a one-year period. The patient's clinical, demographic and radiographic data, American Knee Society scores (AKSS), Oxford Knee scores (OKS) and SF-12 scores was recorded pre-operatively and at one, three and five years. 233 patients underwent 249 primary knee arthroplasties with the PFCSCC. Seventeen patients (19 knees) died and 29 patients (30 knees) were also lost to follow up at the five year point. The mean age was 66.6 (34–80) with 47.6% of the cohort being male. The mean five year follow-up was 1836 days (1530–2307). Five knees (2.2%) were revised for infection and three were revised for pain. The 5–year cumulative survival rate was 96.6% for any failure and 98.6% for aseptic failure. AKSS 32.6 (0–86.6) preoperatively, 80.7 (29–95) 5 years P < 0.001. OKS was 39.0 (22–53) preoperatively, 23.5 (4.7–42.3) 5 years P < 0.001. These results demonstrate a good early survivorship when compared to the old design PFC Sigma, however further follow-up to ten years is required