Adamantinoma are rare, low grade malignant, bone tumors, making up only 0.1–0.48 percent of primary malignant bone tumors. They occur predominantly in the long bones, especially the tibia. Histogenetically it is thought that it originates from embryological displacement of basal epithelium of the skin, although other hypotheses have been proposed. Clinically most patients present with swelling and possible bending of the tibia, painful or painless. It's often noticed in an earlier stadium, but symptoms are non-specific and have a slow progressive character. Median patient age is 25 to 35 years, with a range from two to 86 years. It is slightly more common in men than woman, with a ratio of 5:4. Occurrence in children is even rarer. A study by Van Rijn et al. finds only 119 references, and presents six more cases. Treatment is the same. An MRI-scan should be performed to check for metastasis, loco regional staging and for operative planning. Operative excision and reconstruction is necessary to prevent metastasis and maintain load bearing capacity. Generally these resections and reconstructions are done without objective measurements. The surgeon uses a rule of thumb, like a sculptor, or ruler approach to recreate the excised bone, either with allo- or autograft materials. An optimal fit, i.e. a minimal space between tibia and graft, is not always achieved, possibly resulting in pathological fractures. This risk of pathological fractures lengthens recovery time. The fractures elongate hospitalization time and recovery time and are a heavy burden to patients. Computer assisted surgery (CAS) systems, used for example in prosthesis placement, offer objective measurements in 3d space of hard structures with high accuracy. These can be used to produce an accurate copy of the resected bone. If the reconstruction accurately fits the bone defect that's left after the resection, it's likely that the occurrence of pathological fractures decreases. An adamantinoma in the tibia of a 12 year old boy was treated. Surgery consisted of hemicortical resection and inlay allograft reconstruction. The software used was the Orthomap navigation software (Stryker). A donor bone was supplied with help from the bone bank. The technical approach to the reconstruction was the planning of resection planes around the tumor. As the CT scale for both the patient and allograft bone is the same, the resection planes in the patient navigation setup could be copied to the allograft creation setup. Normal CAS setup was performed after first incision, with a tracker attached to the tibia. It was planned that a navigated bone saw would be used for the cutting. The tracker was attached to the saw with a new attachment, and calibrated in the universal calibration tool. During the surgery the oscillating saw proved to be impossible to navigate. The instrument calibration module was not able to accurately registered the saw, this despite accurate registrations in pre-operative testing. The CAS system was used however for accurately determining the saw planes. The planes were traced with the pointer tool. Then a non-navigated saw was used to perform both trapezoid shaped resections. A similar CAS setup was performed on the donor bone. The reconstruction was a good fit. The skin was closed in layers. Post-operative x-ray control was performed. Operation time was just over two hours. Currently the follow-up time is five months. There have been no complications and the control x-rays show good allograft ingrowth. While the original operation plan couldn't be performed the principle of computer assisted reconstruction has its merits. This was a proof of concept. The navigation was accurate to less than 1 mm, and the trapezoid resection shape guarantees a good fit. However the method of resection of the drawn planes by non-navigated bone saw was not accurate enough, because of the saw oscillations. There was improvement in operation time. With more accurate means of resection, as for example a computer controlled laser or water-jet, this type of reconstruction could have other very interesting applications

The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of the literature and assess outcome of our experience of Ilizarov Bone Transport in reconstruction for primary malignant tumours of bone (PMTB). A systematic review of the literature for reported cases of primary reconstruction of PMTB using distraction osteogenesis was performed. All cases of distraction osteogenesis for primary reconstruction of PMTB in our institution were reviewed. Outcome was determined from retrospective review of case notes and radiology. Patients were contacted to define final status. There are few cases of primary reconstruction of PMTB using Ilizarov method in the literature. Most reports relate to benign tumours or reconstruction of secondary deformities or non-union after tumour resection. At our institution we have treated 7 patients with bone defects resulting from excision of a PMTB. Mean age was 42.1 years (23–48). Tumours occurred in the tibia in 4 cases and the femur in 3 cases. Histologic diagnosis was chondrosarcoma in 3, malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 2, adamantinoma in 1 and malignant intraosseous nerve sheath tumour in 1. All patients were assessed through the hospital sarcoma board and shown to have isolated bone lesions without metastases. Mean bone defect after resection was 13.1 cm (10–17). Mean frame time was 13.6 months (5–23). Mean follow-up was 46 months (15–137). Complications included pin infection, docking site non-union, premature fusion of corticotomy, soft tissue infection and minor varus deformity. There was one local recurrence of tumour at five months after resection, resulting in a through hip disarticulation. The other cases remain tumour-free with united, well-aligned bones and acceptable long-term function. PMTB is rare and poses a major reconstructive dilemma. Distraction osteogenesis provides an effective method of biologic reconstruction in selected cases, and good outcomes can be achieved

Purpose. To investigate the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with external fixator use and to help establish whether current guidelines are appropriate. Methods. Case notes of individuals undergoing external fixator application by the senior author (PC) from March 2005 to June 2011 were examined. In this period 207 individuals underwent 255 primary applications of Ilizarov, Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) or monolateral fixator. Fixators applied were 173 tibial, 63 femoral and 19 to other bones. Records were obtained for 182 individuals (88%), representing 214 operations (84%). Results. Two cases of DVT were found (1%). In both cases mechanical and chemical prophylaxis had been used, as guided by risk assessment. One of these individuals also experienced a PE. This person was of notably high risk, surgery involving excision of tibial adamantinoma and a high body mass index (45). He had also recently travelled from overseas (a travel time of over 3 hours). Other than surgical time there was one additional risk factor in 39 cases, two additional risk factors in four and three additional risk factors in four. Conclusions. Little evidence exists about the incidence of DVT and PE with the use of external fixators. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) provide guidance for thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery with specific recommendations for hip and knee arthroplasty and hip fracture. For orthopaedic surgery other than lower limb arthroplasty NICE recommends thromboprophylaxis is guided by risk factors on a case by case basis. Our findings raise the question of whether extended course chemical thromboprophylaxis, as for lower limb arthroplasty, should be employed for high risk individuals undergoing application of external fixator

Introduction. No published work exists regarding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence with the elective use of external fixators. The aim of this work was to establish the rate of DVT and PE in such cases to help inform whether thromboprophylaxis guided by risk factors is adequate or if a more aggressive approach is required. Patients and methods. Information from a prospectively maintained electronic database and case notes were examined for consecutive patients from March 2005 to June 2011. Occurrence of DVT and PE, detected by ultrasound or CT angiogram, were recorded. Risk factors for thromboembolism, age, weight, height, surgical indications, type of surgery and operative time were recorded. As recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) thromboprophylaxis use is guided by risks of thromboembolism and bleeding. For adults and older adolescent patients contralateral leg compression stockings and an intraoperative calf pump were used. Mobilisation began the morning after surgery and the majority of cases permitted to bear weight fully. Results. Two hundred and seven (207) individuals underwent 255 primary applications of Ilizarov, Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) or monolateral fixator, 173 tibial, 63 femoral and 19 to other bones. Case notes were obtained for 182 individuals (88%), representing 214 operations (84%). One DVT and one PE were recorded, an overall incidence of 2/214 (0.9%) (excluding those under 16 years old 2/143 (1.4%)). In both cases mechanical and chemical prophylaxis had been used as guided by risk assessment. The PE was sustained by a person of notably high risk, surgery involving excision of tibial adamantinoma and a high body mass index (45). He had also recently travelled from overseas (a travel time of over 3 hours). Conclusions. The rate of DVT/PE for elective application of external fixators is low with risk assessment guiding prophylaxis