Introduction. The transition from resident to registrar constitutes a steep learning curve in most medical practitioners’ careers, regardless of speciality. We aimed to determine whether a six-week orthopaedic surgical skills course could increase resident skills and confidence prior to transitioning to orthopaedic registrar within the Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia. Materials. Unaccredited registrars, orthopaedic trainees, and orthopaedic consultants, through a departmental peer reviewed process and survey, developed a six-session course (“Registrar Academy”) that included basic knowledge and essential practical skills training for residents with an interest in becoming orthopaedic registrars. This course was implemented over a 3-month period and assessed. Mixed method quantitative and qualitative evidence was sought via a 14-item and 18-item Likert scale questionnaire coupled with open-ended questions. Ethical approval was granted by our institutions Human Research and Ethics Comittee, reference no.: HREC/16/QGC336. Results/Discussion. Results were qualitatively synthesised using quantitative and qualitative data. Thirteen residents participated in the course. All residents agreed to statements indicating they felt unprepared to work as an orthopaedic registrar and were not confident in performing various core tasks required. After completing the course, residents indicated greater confidence or comfort in all these areas and felt better prepared for the transition to registrar. There was broad approval of the course among participants. Every participant who completed the final questionnaire agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed the course and that it taught usable, reproducible practical skills and increased their orthopaedic knowledge. This group also uniformly agreed or strongly agreed that the course improved their patient care and patient safety. Conclusion. Residents feel unprepared for their transition to orthopaedic registrar and lack confidence in several core competencies. A supplemental “Registrar Academy” within an institution is an effective way to improve knowledge, confidence, and practical skills for residents wishing to transition to a registrar position

Derriford Hospital gained Major Trauma Centre (MTC) status in April 2012, this led to a significant increase in the trauma case load. Our aim was to review registrar exposure to theatre and clinic in the elective and trauma setting. This was then compared to audits performed pre-MTC status and shortly following MTC changes to see if training standards were being maintained. Improvements in registrar rota planning were made following the previous assessment of training. Training was assessed with respect to national recommendations for registrar training. Data was collected for 8 weeks in February and March 2014 for all 12 registrars, and cross-referenced with the on-call and daily rota. The data was divided into training and non -training registrars. Elective exposure had improved in both theatres and clinic along with trauma theatre exposure whilst fracture clinic exposure had reduced since the previous audit. The reduction may be a result of the on-call registrar no longer being present in fracture clinic when on-call in compliance with MTC guidance. Rota management requires a fine balance between service and training commitments. Recent improvements to the management of the registrar rota appear to provide satisfactory training despite the pressures of MTC changes at Derriford Hospital

The process of training orthopaedic registrars in the technique of lower limb arthroplasty (hip & knee) requires a long learning curve. The practice of consultant supervised operating should not compromise the final outcome and patient care. The aim of this study was to compare complication rates of lower limb arthroplasties performed by orthopaedic trainees with the national average. We reviewed specialist registrar operating over a one year period between January 2003–January 2004 with reference to lower limb arthroplasty surgery (hip and knee replacements). A postal questionnaire was sent to 24 specialist registrars on The Welsh Orthopaedic Higher Training Programme in confidence. Complications enquired about were:. infection;. deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism;. dislocation. Data obtained was analysed and individual complication rates were compared with the national United Kingdom average. Complication rates for registrar operated patients were comparable if not lower than the national average. Outcomes after lower limb arthroplasty did not differ between consultants and trainees with regards to complications. The authors conclude that consultant supervised lower limb arthroplasties performed by trainee orthopaedic surgeons is safe and not associated with higher complication rates as one would believe

Aim: To audit the accuracy and efficacy of injections for subacromial impingement administered by our medical staff and specialist role physiotherapist. Methods: 49 patients presenting to the outpatient clinic with subacromial impingement agreed to take part in the study. They were allocated according to date of referral to either the consultant, the physiotherapist or registrar grade for injection via an anterior approach into the subacromial bursa. The therapeutic injection contained a specified volume of radiocontrast as well as depomedrone and lignocaine. Antero-posterior and scapula-Y radiographs were performed immediately after injection. The Constant shoulder score was evaluated before and at six weeks after injection and all radiographs were reviewed by an independent, blinded radiologist recording the position of contrast. Results: Accuracy rates of 67% through an anterior approach were obtained by both the consultant and the physiotherapist. At registrar level 48% accuracy was achieved. Improvement in shoulder score was obtained in 70% of patients with accurate injections, but additionally in 59% of patients with inaccurate injections. Only 7% of cases had contrast confined to the subacromial space; in the remainder, contrast tracked medially around the rotator cuff muscle bellies in 59%, gleno-humeral joint in 20% and within the cuff tendon in 16%. Conclusions: In our practice, the specialist physiotherapist already has an established role in administering therapeutic subacromial injections. Our audit demonstrates acceptable and equal accuracy to the consultant which we feel justifies this particular part of their role. However, at registrar grade the level of accuracy is reduced and most likely reflects inexperience, as over time accuracy improved. Interestingly, shoulder function scores have improved in over half of impingement patients with inaccurate injections which may reflect a generalised ‘field’ effect of steroid on the shoulder

Aims

The aims of this study were to describe the demographic, socioeconomic, and educational factors associated with core surgical trainees (CSTs) who apply to and receive offers for higher surgical training (ST3) posts in Trauma & Orthopaedics (T&O).

Introduction

Following the publication of our original survey in 2000 (Eur. Sp. J. 11(6):515-8 2002) we have sought to re-evaluate the perceptions and attitudes towards spinal surgery of the current UK orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs), and to identify factors influencing an interest in spinal surgery. At that time 175 orthopaedic spinal surgeons in the UK needed to increase by 25% to satisfy parity with other European countries.

Introduction: In order to improve the provision of Spinal Surgery in the United Kingdom, the number of Specialist Spinal Surgeons and Surgeons with an Interest in Spinal Surgery needs to increase by 25% from the existing 175 surgeons. There is an expected shortage of Orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs) planning careers in Spinal Surgery not only to maintain the status quo, with one third of Specialist Spinal Surgeons due to retire in the next three years, but also to provide the needed expansion in numbers.

Methods and results: A postal survey of the 528 SpRs was performed with a response rate fo 71%. The critical question was the post accreditation intention as either a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (greater than 70% of elective work), as a Surgeon with an Interest in Spinal Surgery (more than 30% of elective work), a surgeon doing occasional Spinal Surgery (less than 30% of elective work) or one who avoids all Spinal Surgery. This attitude could then be taken into account when analysing the training provided and the perceptions of Spinal Surgery to identify factors which could be discouraging an interest in Spinal Surgery.

Sixty-nine per cent indicated that they intended to avoid all Spinal Surgery. Thirty-five (9%) intended becoming either Specialist Spinal Surgeons or Surgeons with a Spinal Interest but only nine (2%) are in their final two years of training. The declared intention to avoid Spinal Surgery increases from 54% in the first two years of training, to 70% in the middle two years, and to 75% in the final two years and post C.C.S.T. fellowships. There should be 24 newly accredited Specialist Spinal Surgeons based on a projection of the 4.3% response intending to become Specialist Spinal Surgeons. This leaves a shortfall of 34 Specialist Spinal Surgeons by 2005.

The survey has revealed three main features of Spinal Surgery which appear to have a negative effect on the attitude of the SpRs to Spinal Surgery and overwhelm the potentially attractive features. These are badly organised clinics; the perceived psychological complications of spinal patients; and a perceived inadequate exposure to Spinal Surgery during their training.

Conclusion: It is clear from the response of SpRs that there are important misconceptions concerning Spinal Surgery, together with the shortcomings of training and of the provision of services within the NHS. These have to be addressed urgently if the speciality is to become more attractive to them. Areas where positive action can be taken include the modification of training programmes so that all SpRs are exposed to Spinal Surgery in the formative first three years; properly structured spinal clinics; and above all the need for Spinal Surgeons to be encouraging and enthusiastic about a field of surgery which provides some of the exciting challenges in Orthopaedic Surgery.

To quantify the expected shortage of Orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs) planning careers in Spinal Surgery with one third of Specialist Spinal Surgeons due to retire in the next 3 years and to provide the needed expansion of 25% in the existing number of 175 surgeons.

A postal survey of the 528 SpRs was performed with a response rate of 71%. The critical question was the post accreditation intention as either a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (greater than 70% of elective work), as a Surgeon with an Interest in Spinal Surgery (more than 30% of elective work), a surgeon doing occasional Spinal Surgery (less than 30% of elective work) or one who avoids all Spinal Surgery. This attitude could then be taken into account when analysing the training provided and the perceptions of Spinal Surgery to identify factors which could be discouraging an interest in Spinal Surgery.

Sixty nine percent indicated that they intended to avoid all Spinal Surgery. Thirty five (9%) intended becoming either Specialist Spinal Surgeons or Surgeons with a Spinal Interest but only 9 (2%) are in their final two years of training. The declared intention to avoid Spinal Surgery increases from 54% in the first 2 years of training, to 70% in the middle 2 years, and to 75% in the final 2 years and post CCST fellowships. Based on a projection of the 4. 3% response intending to become Specialist Spinal Surgeons there will be a shortfall of 34 Specialist Spinal Surgeons by 2005.

The features of Spinal Surgery which appear to have a negative affect and overwhelm the potentially attractive features are badly organised clinics; the perceived psychological complications of spinal patients; and a perceived inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during SpR training.

The modification of training programmes so that all SpRs are exposed to Spinal Surgery in the formative first three years; properly structured spinal clinics; and a need for Spinal Surgeons to be encouraging and enthusiastic about this field of surgery are essential.

Objectives: To surgery the UK Specialist Orthopaedic Registrars (SpRs) to assess their perceptions of and attitudes towards spinal surgery, and to identify factors discouraging interest in spinal surgery.

Introduction: In order to improve the provision of spinal surgery in the UK, the existing 175 Orthopaedic Surgeons with an interest in Spinal Surgery needs to increase by 25%. There is a predicted shortfall in the number of orthopaedic trainees intending to practise spinal surgery.

Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to all 578 SpRs

Results: Three hundred and seventy-four replied (71%). Sixty-nine percent intend to avoid spinal surgery. Thirtyfive (9%) intend becoming either Specialist Spinal Surgeons or Surgeons with a Spinal interest. Their perceptions will be discussed; the intellectual challenge and opportunities for research are widely recognised but are outweighed by poor perceptions of outcomes of surgery, psychological complications, and of badly organised clinics. There is also inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during training.

Conclusions: Training in spinal surgery could be improved by exposure to spinal surgery at an earlier stage of training, and the development of more specialised units with properly structured spinal clinics to include triage systems to assess referrals and close liaison between the specialities required to treat these patients.

Introduction: Following the publication of our original survey in 2000 (Eur. Sp. J.11(6):515–8 2002) we have sought to re-evaluate the perceptions and attitudes towards spinal surgery of the current UK orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpR’s), and to identify factors influencing an interest in spinal surgery. At that time 175 orthopaedic spinal surgeons in the UK needed to increase by 25% to satisfy parity with other European countries.

Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to all 950 SpR’s. The questionnaire sought to identify perceptions in spinal surgery, levels of current training and practice, and intentions to pursue a career in spinal surgery.

Results: As before, a 70% response rate has confirmed that 74% of trainees intend to avoid spinal surgery (69% in 2000). However 10% are committed to become a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (9% in 2000). Their perceptions were wide ranging but most concluded that the intellectual challenge and opportunities for research are widely recognised. However enthusiasm is dampened by poor perceptions of outcomes from surgery, negative somatization and depression associations, complications and the fear of litigation. In some areas there is inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during the first 4 years of training.

Conclusions: Spinal surgery remains a career choice for 10% of surgical trainees (up 1% since 2000). With a large SpR expansion (578 to 950 SpRs in the last 5 years) an average of 16 new spinal surgeons annually will be produced over the next six years. This has improved on the figure of 8.6 per year from 2000 and represents a 200% increase in numbers per year. These figures suggest that by 2011 and allowing for retirement, there should be enough spinal surgeons to meet the desired UK/Europe ratio.

Aims. Patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) require emergency imaging and surgical decompression. The severity and type of symptoms may influence the timing of imaging and surgery, and help predict the patient’s prognosis. Categories of CES attempt to group patients for management and prognostication purposes. We aimed in this study to assess the inter-rater reliability of dividing patients with CES into categories to assess whether they can be reliably applied in clinical practice and in research. Methods. A literature review was undertaken to identify published descriptions of categories of CES. A total of 100 real anonymized clinical vignettes of patients diagnosed with CES from the Understanding Cauda Equina Syndrome (UCES) study were reviewed by consultant spinal surgeons, neurosurgical registrars, and medical students. All were provided with published category definitions and asked to decide whether each patient had ‘suspected CES’; ‘early CES’; ‘incomplete CES’; or ‘CES with urinary retention’. Inter-rater agreement was assessed for all categories, for all raters, and for each group of raters using Fleiss’s kappa. Results. Each of the 100 participants were rated by four medical students, five neurosurgical registrars, and four consultant spinal surgeons. No groups achieved reasonable inter-rater agreement for any of the categories. CES with retention versus all other categories had the highest inter-rater agreement (kappa 0.34 (95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.31); minimal agreement). There was no improvement in inter-rater agreement with clinical experience. Across all categories, registrars agreed with each other most often (kappa 0.41), followed by medical students (kappa 0.39). Consultant spinal surgeons had the lowest inter-rater agreement (kappa 0.17). Conclusion. Inter-rater agreement for categorizing CES is low among clinicians who regularly manage these patients. CES categories should be used with caution in clinical practice and research studies, as groups may be heterogenous and not comparable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(9):1007–1012

Orthopaedic surgery is a practical surgical specialization field, the exit exam for registrars remains written and oral. Despite logbook evaluation and surgical work-based assessments, the question remains: can registrars perform elective surgery upon qualification? In South Africa, obstacles to elective surgical training include the trauma workload, financial constraints, fellowships and the Covid pandemic. In hip and knee arthroplasty, new approaches like the direct anterior approach (DAA) and robotic-assisted knee surgery also contributed to the dilution of cases available for registrar training. There are concerns that orthopaedic registrars do not perform enough cases to achieve surgical proficiency. Review of the last 4 years of registrar logbooks in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery performed in a single tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. We included all primary total hip replacements (THR), total knee replacements (TKR) and hemiarthroplasties (HA) done for neck of femur (NOF) fractures between 1 April 2019 and 30 March 2023. Differentiation between registrar assisting, registrar performing with consultant supervision and registrar performing independent surgery was done. 990 hip arthroplasties (472 Primary THR, 216 NOF THR, 302 NOF HA) and 316 Primary TKR were performed during the study period. In primary elective THR the posterior approach was dominant and used in 76% of cases. In NOF THA the DAA was dominant used in 98% of cases. Primary TKR robotic-assisted technologies was used in 27% (n=94) cases. Registrars as the primary surgeon were the highest in NOF THA at 70% of cases and the lowest performing TKR at 25%. During 3-month rotations, an average registrar performed 12 (2 TKR and 10 THR) and assisted in 35 (10 TKR and 25 THR) cases. Despite the large number of arthroplasties operations being performed over the last 4-year period, the surgical cases done by registrars are below, the proposed minimal cases to provide surgical proficiency during their training period

Distal radius fractures are common in South Africa. Accurate, decisive radiographic parameter interpretation is key in appropriate management. Digital radiographic facilities are rare in the public setting and goniometer usage is known to be low, thus, visual estimates are the primary form of radiographic assessment. Previous research associated orthopaedic experience with accuracy of distal radius fracture parameter estimation but, oftentimes, doctors treating orthopaedic patients are not experienced in orthopaedics. A cross-sectional questionnaire including four distal radius fracture radiographs administered to 149 orthopaedic doctors at three Johannesburg teaching hospitals. Participants grouped into ranks of: consultants (n=36), registrars (n=41), medical officers (n=20) and interns (n=52). Participants visually estimated values of distal radius fracture parameters, stated whether they would accept the position of the fractures and stated their percentage of routine usage of goniometers in real practice. The registrar group was most accurate in visually estimating radial height, whilst the interns were least accurate (p=0.0237). The consultant, registrar and medical officer groups were equally accurate in estimating radial inclination whilst the intern group was the least accurate (p<0.0001). The consultant and registrar group were equally accurate at estimating volar tilt, whilst the medical officer and intern groups were least accurate (p<0.0001). The Gwet's AC agreement was 0.1612 (p=0.047) for acceptance of position of the first radiograph, 0.8768 (p<0.0001) for the second, 0.8884 (p<0.0001) for the third and 0.8064 (p<0.0001) for the fourth. All groups showed no difference in goniometer usage, using them largely 0–25% of practice (p=0.1937). The study found that accuracy in visual estimations of distal radius fracture parameters was linked to orthopaedic experience but not linked to routine practice goniometer usage, which was minimal across all groups. Inter-rater agreement on acceptability of fracture position is potentially dependent on severity of deviation from acceptable parameters

Aims. Classifying trochlear dysplasia (TD) is useful to determine the treatment options for patients suffering from patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is no consensus on which classification system is more reliable and reproducible for the purpose of guiding clinicians’ management of PFI. There are also concerns about the validity of the Dejour Classification (DJC), which is the most widely used classification for TD, having only a fair reliability score. The Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC) is a recently proposed system of classification of TD, and the authors report a fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intraobserver agreement in the assessment of TD. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of these two classifications. Methods. In all, six assessors (four consultants and two registrars) independently evaluated 100 axial MRIs of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) for TD and classified them according to OBC and DJC. These assessments were again repeated by all raters after four weeks. The inter- and intraobserver reliability scores were calculated using Cohen’s kappa and Cronbach’s α. Results. Both classifications showed good to excellent interobserver reliability with high α scores. The OBC classification showed a substantial intraobserver agreement (mean kappa 0.628; p < 0.005) whereas the DJC showed a moderate agreement (mean kappa 0.572; p < 0.005). There was no significant difference in the kappa values when comparing the assessments by consultants with those by registrars, in either classification system. Conclusion. This large study from a non-founding institute shows both classification systems to be reliable for classifying TD based on axial MRIs of the PFJ, with the simple-to-use OBC having a higher intraobserver reliability score than that of the DJC. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):532–538

Classifying trochlear dysplasia (TD) is useful to determine the treatment options for patients suffering from patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is no consensus on which classification system is more reliable and reproducible for this purpose to guide clinicians in order to treat PFI. There are also concerns about validity of the Dejour classification (DJC), which is the most widely used classification for TD, having only a fair reliability score. The Oswestry-Bristol classification (OBC) is a recently proposed system of classification of TD and the authors report a fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intra-observer agreement in the assessment of TD. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of these two classifications. 6 assessors (4 consultants and 2 registrars) independently evaluated 100 magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint for TD and classified them according to OBC and DJC. These assessments were again repeated by all raters after 4 weeks. The inter and intra-observer reliability scores were calculated using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha. Both classifications showed good to excellent interobserver reliability with high alpha scores. The OBC classification showed a substantial intra-observer agreement (mean kappa 0.628)[p<0.005] whereas the DJC showed a moderate agreement (mean kappa 0.572) [p<0.005]. There was no significant difference in the kappa values when comparing the assessments by consultants to those by registrars, in either classification systems. This large study from a non-founding institute shows both classification systems to be reliable for classifying TD based on magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint, with the simple to use OBC having a higher intra-observer reliability score compared to the DJC

Conventional fracture courses utilise prefabricated sawbones that are not realistic or patient specific. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of creating 3D fracture models and utilising them in fracture courses to teach surgical technique. We selected an AO type 2R3C2 fracture that underwent open reduction internal fixation. De-identified CT scan images were converted to a stereolithography (STL) format. This was then processed using Computer Aided Design (CAD) to create a virtual 3D model. The model was 3D printed using a combination of standard thermoplastic polymer (STP) and a porous filler to create a realistic cortical and cancellous bone. A case-based sawbone workshop was organised for residents, unaccredited registrars, and orthopaedic trainees comparing the fracture model with a prefabricated T-split distal radius fracture. Pre-operative images aided discussion of fixation, and post-operative x-rays allowed comparison between the participants fixation. Participants were provided with identical reduction tools. We created a questionnaire for participants to rate their satisfaction and experience using a Likert scale. The 3D printed fracture model aided understanding and appreciation of the fracture pattern and key fragments amongst residents and unaccredited trainees. Real case-based models provided a superior learning experience and environment to aid teaching. The generic sawbone provided easier drilling and inserting of screws. Preliminary results show that the cost of 3D printing can be comparable to generic sawbones. It is feasible to create a fracture model with a real bone feel. Further research and development is required to determine the optimum material to use for a more realistic feel. The use of 3D printed fracture models is feasible and provides an alternative to generic sawbone fracture models in providing surgical training to residents

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common types of fracture and one which is often treated surgically. Standard X-rays are obtained for DRFs, and in most cases that have an intra-articular component, a routine CT is also performed. However, it is estimated that CT is only required in 20% of cases and therefore routine CT's results in the overutilisation of resources burdening radiology and emergency departments. In this study, we explore the feasibility of using deep learning to differentiate intra- and extra-articular DRFs automatically and help streamline which fractures require a CT. Retrospectively x-ray images were retrieved from 615 DRF patients who were treated with an ORIF at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital. The images were classified into AO Type A, B or C fractures by three training registrars supervised by a consultant. Deep learning was utilised in a two-stage process: 1) localise and focus the region of interest around the wrist using the YOLOv5 object detection network and 2) classify the fracture using a EfficientNet-B3 network to differentiate intra- and extra-articular fractures. The distal radius region of interest (ROI) detection stage using the ensemble model of YOLO networks detected all ROIs on the test set with no false positives. The average intersection over union between the YOLO detections and the ROI ground truth was Error! Digit expected.. The DRF classification stage using the EfficientNet-B3 ensemble achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 for differentiating intra-articular fractures. The proposed DRF classification framework using ensemble models of YOLO and EfficientNet achieved satisfactory performance in intra- and extra-articular fracture classification. This work demonstrates the potential in automatic fracture characterization using deep learning and can serve to streamline decision making for axial imaging helping to reduce unnecessary CT scans

Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures suffer from poor interobserver agreement, and their value in preoperative assessment to guide surgical fixation strategies is limited. For tibial plateau fractures four major characteristics are identified: lateral split fragment, posteromedial fragment, anterior tubercle fragment, and central zone of comminution. These fracture characteristics support preoperative assessment of fractures and guide surgical decision-making as each specific component requires a respective fixation strategy. We aimed to evaluate the additional value of 3D-printed models for the identification of tibial plateau fracture characteristics in terms of the interobserver agreement on different fracture characteristics. Preoperative images of 40 patients were randomly selected. Nine trauma surgeons, eight senior and eight junior registrars indicated the presence or absence of four fracture characteristics with and without 3D-printed models. The Fleiss kappa was used to determine interobserver agreement for fracture classification and for interpretation, the Landis and Koch criteria were used. 3D-printed models lead to a categorical improvement in interobserver agreement for three of four fracture characteristics: lateral split (Kconv = 0.445 versus K3Dprint = 0.620; P < 0.001), anterior tubercle fragment (Kconv = 0.288 versus K3Dprint = 0.449; P < 0.001) and zone of comminution (Kconv = 0.535 versus K3Dprint = 0.652; P < 0.001). The overall interobserver agreement improved for three of four fracture characteristics after the addition of 3D printed models. For two fracture characteristics, lateral split and zone of comminution, a substantial interobserver agreement was achieved. Fracture characteristics seem to be a more reliable way to assess tibial plateau fractures and one should consider including these in the preoperative assessment of tibial plateau fractures compared to the commonly used classification systems

The Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) was developed by modified Delphi system in 2022 to provide a comprehensive, reproducible framework for the multidisciplinary discussion of complex revision hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the validity, intra-relater and inter-relater reliability of the RHCC. Radiographs and clinical vignettes of 20 consecutive patients who had undergone revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) at our unit during the previous 12-month period were provided to observers. Five observers, comprising 3 revision hip consultants, 1 hip fellow and 1 ST3-8 registrar were familiarised with the RHCC. Each revision THA case was classified on two separate occasions by each observer, with a mean time between assessments of 42.6 days (24–57). Inter-observer reliability was assessed using the Fleiss™ Kappa statistic and percentage agreement. Intra-observer reliability was assessed using the Cohen Kappa statistic. Validity was assessed using percentage agreement and Cohen Kappa comparing observers to the RHCC web-based application result. All observers were blinded to patient notes, operation notes and post-operative radiographs throughout the process. Inter-observer reliability showed fair agreement in both rounds 1 and 2 of the survey (0.296 and 0.353 respectively), with a percentage agreement of 69% and 75%. Inter-observer reliability was highest in H3-type revisions with kappa values of 0.577 and 0.441. Mean intra-observer reliability showed moderate agreement with a kappa value of 0.446 (0.369 to 0.773). Validity percentage agreement was 44% and 39% respectively, with mean kappa values of 0.125 and 0.046 representing only slight agreement. This study demonstrates that classification using the RHCC without utilisation of the web-based application is unsatisfactory, showing low validity and reliability. Reliability was higher for more complex H3-type cases. The use of the RHCC web app is recommended to ensure the accurate and reliable classification of revision THA cases

Alcohol hand rubs, endorsed by WHO and NICE guidelines, are integral to modern surgical practices. Our objective was to assess how different scrubbing methods impact overall water usage by the surgical team, shedding light on variations among team members and their environmental implications. Over three consecutive arthroplasty lists spanning a week, water usage during scrubbing was observed for the operating team. Blinding all team members, including the anesthetist, consultant surgeon, orthopaedic registrar, orthopaedic SHO, and scrub nurse, during water usage calculations was implemented. Automated taps, using motion sensors, posed a challenge due to variable water quantity, necessitating water flow calculations per sensor movement. The senior surgeon, with over 20 years of experience, follows a traditional approach, starting with a morning prescrub and using an alcohol tub for each case, except when hands are soiled. We observed a total of 14 cases of lower limb primary arthroplasty. The cumulative water usage for scrubbing by the entire team was 193 liters, yielding a mean of 13.8 liters (±1.85) per case. The anaesthetist demonstrated the most conservative water usage, utilizing a total of 11.85 liters with a mean of 0.84 liters per case. Notably, alcohol rub was employed for half of the observed time, contributing to this efficient use. The senior operating surgeon used a total of 15.6 liters, averaging 1.1 liters per case. In contrast, the SHO and the registrar exhibited the highest water consumption, totaling 121.6 liters and yielding a mean of 5.7 liters per case. The nurses’ collective water usage for scrubbing amounted to 44.8 liters. Adopting alcohol rub, as endorsed by WHO, results in a remarkable 10-fold reduction in water usage, aligning with global health guidelines. This highlights significant potential for resource conservation in surgical procedures, presenting a practical and environmentally conscious approach to surgical scrubbing practices

Aims. COVID-19 has changed the practice of orthopaedics across the globe. The medical workforce has dealt with this outbreak with varying strategies and adaptations, which are relevant to its field and to the region. As one of the ‘hotspots’ in the UK , the surgical branch of trauma and orthopaedics need strategies to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of COVID-19. Methods. Adapting to the crisis locally involved five operational elements: 1) triaging and workflow of orthopaedic patients; 2) operation theatre feasibility and functioning; 3) conservation of human resources and management of workforce in the department; 4) speciality training and progression; and 5) developing an exit strategy to resume elective work. Two hospitals under our trust were redesignated based on the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Registrar/consultant led telehealth reviews were carried out for early postoperative patients. Workflows for the management of outpatient care and inpatient care were created. We looked into the development of a dedicated operating space to perform the emergency orthopaedic surgeries without symptoms of COVID-19. Between March 23 and April 23, 2020, we have surgically treated 133 patients across both our hospitals in our trust. This mainly included hip fractures and fractures/infection affecting the hand. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic is not the first disease outbreak affecting the UK, nor will it be the last. The current crisis has necessitated rapid development of new hospital guidelines and early adaptive strategies in our services. Protocols and directives need to be formalized keeping in mind that COVID-19 will have a long and protracted course until a definitive cure is discovered

Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the provision of orthopaedic care across the UK. During the pandemic orthopaedic specialist registrars were redeployed to “frontline” specialties occupying non-surgical roles. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic training in the UK is unknown. This paper sought to examine the role of orthopaedic trainees during the COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate orthopaedic education. Methods. A 42-point questionnaire was designed, validated, and disseminated via e-mail and an instant-messaging platform. Results. A total of 101 orthopaedic trainees, representing the four nations (Wales, England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland), completed the questionnaire. Overall, 23.1% (23/101) of trainees were redeployed to non-surgical roles. Of these, 73% (17/23) were redeployed to intensive treatment units (ITUs), 13% (3/23) to A/E, and 13%(3/23%) to general medicine. Of the trainees redeployed to ITU 100%, (17/17) received formal induction. Non-deployed or returning trainees had a significant reduction in sessions. In total, 42.9% (42/101) % of trainees were not timetabled into fracture clinic, 53% (53/101) of trainees had one allocated theatre list per week, and 63.8%(64/101) of trainees did not feel they obtained enough experience in the attached subspecialty and preferred repeating this. Overall, 93% (93/101) of respondents attended at least one weekly online webinar, with 79% (79/101) of trainees rating these as useful or very useful, while 95% (95/101) trainees attended online deanery teaching which was rated as more useful than online webinars (p = 0.005). Conclusion. Orthopaedic specialist trainees occupied an important role during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 has had a significant impact on orthopaedic training. It is imperative this is properly understood to ensure orthopaedic specialist trainees achieve competencies set out in the training curriculum. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:676–682

Time at the surgical ‘coal-face’ has been reduced by introduction of the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) significantly impacting training opportunity. Our null hypothesis was that duration of surgery is significantly longer if a trainee were performing the operation despite supervision or level of trainee experience. Cemented hip hemiarthroplasty was chosen as our index procedure as complexity is largely comparable between cases. 461 patients were identified on the hospital trauma database. Data were augmented by information regarding level of surgeon, assistant and time of surgery from the hospital theatre database. There was no significant difference in registrar and consultant operative times, mean time 69 and 72 minutes respectively. SHOs were significantly slower (mean 80 minutes, p=0.0006). Junior (ST5 or less) registrars were significantly slower (mean 81minutes, p=0.0002) whereas senior registrars were not. Supervision level had no effect on duration of senior registrar operations but when junior registrars were consultant supervised they were not significantly slower (mean 75 minutes, p=0.09). Supervised operating therefore reduces time variability and should be promoted within a climate of training. Increase in mean operative time in registrars and SHOs is insignificant within a day's operating and is unlikely to lead to cancellations of cases

Introduction. Post-traumatic arthritis is the commonest cause of arthritis of the ankle. Development of arthritis is dependent on the restoration of pre-injury anatomy. To assess the effect of grade of lead surgeon on the accuracy of surgical reduction, we performed a retrospective radiographic analysis of all ankle fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation, in a single institution. Method. All patients treated by surgical intervention in an 11 month period (January to November 2011) were included, with the grade of lead surgeon performing the operation recorded.105 patients, 48 males and 53 females, were included with a mean age of 41 years (range: 17–89). Standard antero-posterior (AP) and mortise views were analysed for tibiofibular overlap, ankle clear space and talocrural angle and compared to standardised values from the literature. Lead surgeon grade was stratified as either, trauma consultant, senior registrar (years 4+) or junior registrar (years 1–3). Results. Radiographic reduction within accepted margins was achieved in 78% of ankles on the AP radiograph and 81% on the mortise view. Trauma consultants achieved the highest rate of anatomical reduction, followed by senior registrars, with junior registrars achieving the lowest rate; the rates of anatomical reduction on the mortise view were 83.3%, 79.2% and 75%, respectively. However, senior registrars performed the majority of cases (70%). Conclusion. Radiographic reduction in this institute is comparable to that in the literature. The majority of cases are performed by senior trainees who are able to restore to anatomical reduction radiographically. Junior registrars achieved the lowest rate of anatomical reduction, which may reflect their level of experience and a greater need for supervision in the early years of specialty training

We describe the results at five years of a prospective study of a new tri-tapered polished, cannulated, cemented femoral stem implanted in 51 patients (54 hips) with osteoarthritis. The mean age and body mass index of the patients was 74 years and 27.9, respectively. Using the anterolateral approach, half of the stems were implanted by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon and half by six different registrars. There were three withdrawals from the study because of psychiatric illness, a deep infection and a recurrent dislocation. Five deaths occurred prior to five-year follow-up and one patient withdrew from clinical review. In the remaining 51 hips the mean pre-operative Oxford hip score was 47 points which decreased to 19 points at five years (45 hips). Of the stems 49 (98%) were implanted within 1° of neutral in the femoral canal. The mean migration of the stem at five years was 1.9 mm and the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 100%. There was no significant difference in outcome between the consultant and registrar groups. At five years, the results were comparable with those of other polished, tapered, cemented stems. Long-term surveillance continues

Background and Aims:. Forearm fractures are common in the paediatric population and most are treated in a moulded plaster of Paris (POP) cast. It is our concern that many casts applied by our registrars are sub-optimal and that we need to improve our training process. The aim of our study was to review the adequacy of forearm cast application in paediatric patients at our institution and to identify if there is a need for a more formal training program with regard to plaster cast application. Methods:. A retrospective review of control x-rays of forearm fractures treated at our institution was undertaken. X-rays that were reviewed were done as part of the routine treatment protocol. X-ray measurements to assess POP application were the cast index and the gap index. A cast index of > 0.81 and Gap index of > 0.15 were regarded as an indication of poor cast application. Results:. Adequate control X-rays of twenty eight patients with a forearm fracture were available. The average patient age range was 5–12 years. There were thirteen distal metaphyseal fractures, nine diaphyseal fractures and six Salter-Harris type fractures. Of the 28 patients, 20 patients had a poor cast index and 17 patients had poor gap index. In 12 patients both the gap and the cast index were unacceptable. Conclusion:. Our study suggests that paediatric forearm plaster cast application by registrars at our institution is inadequate. This indicates a need for a strategy to improve the training in plaster cast application amongst our registrars

Aim: To determine if extended scope physiotherapists perform to the same standards as their orthopaedic colleagues with regards to diagnosing knee pathology and making appropriate referrals for arthroscopy. Method: Data was collected prospectively from Aug 2005. Patients were seen in a consultant led orthopaedic clinic by an Extended Scope Physiotherapist (ESP), a registrar or the consultant. All patients placed onto the waiting list for knee arthroscopy were considered for the study. The outpatient diagnosis and demographic data were recorded and compared against the arthroscopy findings. A single consultant surgeon performed the arthroscopies. Results: 300 patients were included in the study (100 in each group). Each group was similar in terms of presenting complaint and demographics. There was no significant difference between the ESP’s and registrars in their ability to diagnose intraarticular pathology (CHI squared test: X 2.031, df 1, p=0.15). When only cruciate and meniscal pathology were considered there was also no significant difference between the ESP’s and the registrars (Fishers test p=0.12 and p=0.22 respectively, 2-tail test) The ESPs performed particularly well in their ability to diagnose cruciate injuries (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100% and PPV 100%). Both ESPs and registrars had high sensitivity but low specificity with regards to diagnosing meniscal pathology suggesting a low threshold for a positive diagnosis and a poor ability to correctly diagnose those patients who did not have a meniscal injury. Of the 300 patients only 9 unnecessary arthroscopies were requested. None were requested by the ESPs. Conclusions: Extended scope physiotherapists perform a useful role in orthopaedic outpatients. They perform as well as orthopaedic registrars with regards to making the correct diagnosis and the selection of patients for arthroscopy

To determine if extended scope physiotherapists perform to the same standards as their orthopaedic colleagues with regards to diagnosing knee pathology and making appropriate referrals for arthroscopy. Data was collected prospectively from Aug 2005. Patients were seen in a consultant led orthopaedic clinic by an Extended Scope Physiotherapist (ESP), a registrar or the consultant. All patients placed onto the waiting list for knee arthroscopy were considered for the study. The outpatient diagnosis and demographic data were recorded and compared against the arthroscopy findings. A single consultant surgeon performed the arthroscopies. 300 patients were included in the study (100 in each group). Each group was similar in terms of presenting complaint and demographics. There was no significant difference between the ESP’s and registrars in their ability to diagnose intraarticular pathology (CHI squared test: X 2.031, df 1, p=0.15). When only cruciate and meniscal pathology were considered there was also no significant difference between the ESP’s and the registrars (Fishers test p=0.12 and p=0.22 respectively, 2-tail test) The ESPs performed particularly well in their ability to diagnose cruciate injuries (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100% and PPV 100%). Both ESPs and registrars had high sensitivity but low specificity with regards to diagnosing meniscal pathology suggesting a low threshold for a positive diagnosis and a poor ability to correctly diagnose those patients who did not have a meniscal injury. Of the 300 patients only 9 unnecessary arthroscopies were requested. None were requested by the ESPs. Extended scope physiotherapists perform a useful role in orthopaedic outpatients. They perform as well as orthopaedic registrars with regards to making the correct diagnosis and the selection of patients for arthroscopy

Background: Medial plica syndrome is the most common symptomatic plica. The size and shape of the plica have an important impact on impingement on the femoral condyle and hence, symptoms. The validity of the classification systems of such injuries is essential for prospective studies. The study was designed to assess the reproducibility and reliability of Iino and Jee classification systems of medial plica syndrome. The agreement among multiple surgeons for medial plica syndrome has not been established before. Methods: We validated both classification systems independently from the original authors at our institution. Arthroscopic videos from 30 patients were reviewed by 6 consultant surgeons, 6 registrars and 6 house officers. Intra- and inter-observer reliability and reproducibility were assessed. Each observer scored the videos on two separate occasions and classified the medial plica according to its type (A, B, C and D) for Iino classification and (1, 2, 3 and 4) for Jee classification system. Results: The results were subjected to weighted kappa analysis. Intra-observer agreements were 0.76 for consultants, 0.64 for registrars and 0.60 for house officers for Iino classification system. They were 0.81 for consultants, 0.75 for registrars and 0.71 for house officers for Jee classification system. Total unanimity (18 observers assigned same grade for medial plica) was achieved in 23% (7 of 30) with Iino system and 40%(12 of 30) for Jee system. Inter-observer agreement was 0.63 for the first reading and 0.68 for the second reading for Iino system. They were 0.72 for the first reading and 0.80 for the second reading for Jee system. Validity analysis showed a kappa value of 0.78 (substantial agreement). Conclusions: Jee classification system showed a better inter and intra-observer agreement compared to Iino’s system. Consultants had a better intra-observer agreement compared to their registrars. We have shown that substantial agreement can be found between individuals with no specialist training. Such reliability is crucial for multi-centre clinical research studies involving arthroscopic knee surgery. Jee’s classification system did not consider femoral condyle impingment which has an important effect on symptoms. Both systems should be used in prospective studies to evaluate the state of the medial plica

Current orthopaedic practice involves an increasing use of operative fluoroscopic screening and radiation exposure. The AOA produces a booklet entitled “Radiation safety for orthopaedic surgeons” outlining the risks. There is a disparity between guidelines and actual clinical practice for trainee registrars. Aims:. To measure trainee fluoroscopy usage with and without consultants present. To audit trainees and hospitals adherence to the guidelines. All procedures in a 6 month period using II were analysed. Data for Procedure, Operating Surgeon, First Assistant and if Consultant Surgeon was present or absent was collected. Fluoroscopic Exposure Time was also recorded. Procedures were grouped and times compared depending on the staff present. There were 121 cases included in the study. 44 cases were performed by the trainee with the consultant assisting and 76 were performed in the absence of the consultant. A questionnaire based on the AOA guidelines was produced. All NSW advanced trainees in Orthopaedic surgery were asked to complete the anonymous questionnaire. There was a significant difference of 32.18 seconds in mean exposure time per case with a p-value 0.0069 where the consultant was present or not. There was also a significant difference between consultants doing the same cases. Other very significant findings were:. 97% of trainees were not aware of the maintenance and inspection schedules equipment. 97% of trainees have practiced the incorrect technique of using the image receptor of the II machine as an operating table which maximizes scatter to the head and neck. 65% regularly use continuous screening of II. 65% admit to taking unnecessary II shots to ensure the perfect xray. 32% of trainees wore no thyroid protection, 87% no eye protection and 100% used no head and hand protection. One registrar was exposed to 8131 seconds of II exposure during his 6 month rotation. Without the use of lead protection, the trainee registrar will have exceeded the annual limit of whole body exposure (20mSv/year) by more than 2-fold. Dramatic decreases in exposure can be achieved by better discipline with the usage of II. This needs to be a fundamental part of registrar training. The survey shows trainees are not aware, or fail to adhere to current guidelines and that hospitals are not providing appropriate safety equipment and not insisting that staff exercise safe practices

Introduction. The stability of the elbow joint following an acute elbow dislocation is dependent on associated injuries. The ability to identify these concomitant injuries correctly directs management and improves the chances of a successful outcome. Interpretation of plain radiographs in the presence of either a dislocation or post-reduction films with plaster in-situ is difficult. This study aimed to assess the ability of orthopaedic registrars to accurately identify associated bony injuries on initial plain radiographs using CT as the gold standard for comparison. Methods. Patients over the age of 16 years undergoing an elbow CT scan within one week of a documented elbow dislocation between 1st June 2010 and 1st June 2014 were included in the study. Three orthopaedic registrars independently reviewed both the initial dislocation and immediate post reduction plain radiographs to identify any associated bony injuries. This radiograph review was repeated by each registrar after two weeks. The incidence of associated injuries as well as the inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated. Results. 28 patients were included in the study. 54% of the patients were female and the mean age was 45 years (range 16 to 90 years). The incidence of a radial head fracture was 54%, coronoid fracture 43% and epicondyle avulsion 18% on CT. The inter-observer reliability was only shown to be fair amongst registrars and the intra-observer variability moderate. Conclusions. Computerised tomography is a useful adjunct in the assessment of associated osseous injuries following an elbow dislocation due to the presence of a high number of injuries. Plain radiographs alone have been shown to have only a fair and moderate inter and intra-observer variability respectively, therefore a low threshold to obtain further 3D imaging should be practised. Level of Evidence. IV

Parallel operating lists are a contentious subject. Many people feel that supervision, training and quality of patient care is negatively affected and consider this an outdated model in modern practice. Dual and parallel lists have been largely abandoned due to training committees' opinions that standards of orthopaedic training were being negatively affected. A new model of dual lists was implemented in a district general hospital as part of an arthroplasty service. The training impact was evaluated. Adjacent theatres were utilised for a single session. Two joint replacement surgeries were undertaken in each theatre. The sequential timing of the lists allowed the consultant to perform or supervise all of the operations in a consecutive manor. Staggering the start times allowed the consultant to approach and implant the first joint replacement, leaving the junior doctor or nurse practitioner to close the first operation and get the patient off the table while the consultant transferred to the adjoining theatre where the registrar had positioned, painted and draped the second patient, allowing the consultant to perform or supervise the second surgery. The process was then repeated until all four cases were performed. Evaluation of two registrar's elogbooks was undertaken and compared to the national average. During a twelve month period the trainees was involved in a mean of 72 joint replacement surgeries compared to a national average of 49. The trainees were the primary surgeon in a significantly higher number of operations compared to the national average. This model of sequential operating lists facilitated a service of high volume arthroplasty surgeries and significantly increased the exposure of the training registrar to joint replacements. Supervision of trainees was not significantly impacted. The model requires effective support services and a dedicated team of theatre staff, but can be very rewarding for consultant surgeon and trainee alike

Background. Positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty has profound effects on the biomechanics, stability and wear of the prosthesis. Normal anatomical position in females is 57 degrees (50 – 67 degrees) inclination with 19 degrees (9 – 32 degrees) of anteversion, whilst in males 56 degrees of inclination (48 – 66 degrees) with 19 degrees (9 – 32 degrees) is normal. In total hip arthroplasty, inclination recommendation ranges from 30 – 50 degrees. The aim of this study was to radiographically measure acetabular component position in total hip arthroplasty and compare to normal values. Method. The Widmer method was used by two independent observers to radiographically measure inclination in 522 patients using standard AP radiographs. Primary measures and variables were statistically analysed as was inter and intra observer reliability. All patients included within the study received total hip arthroplasty for age related degenerative changes to the hip. Operations were undertaken by 17 separate consultants or senior registrars under their care. Results. Overall mean inclination was measured at 45.27 degrees with a range of 26 – 68 degrees. Statistically significant differences were observed between cemented 45.9o and non-cemented hips 43.9 degrees (p= 0.018), Simple 45.5 degrees vs complex 42.1 degrees (p=0.003) and Male 44.3 degrees vs Female 46.2 degrees (p=0.0198). No statistical difference was seen between consultant and registrar (p=0.211) and right vs left (p=0.768). Inter observer reliability was seen to be 0.91 whilst intra observer reliability 0.96. Conclusion. Although a large range of outcomes were observed, 95% of radiographs reviewed fell within a range of 33.6 – 56.9 degrees Variables such as surgical positioning, patient anatomy/body habitus, surgical technique, instrumentation likely influenced abnormal results. Abnormal positioning may have effects such as eccentric wear and dislocation, however, and such findings are yet to be observed in the study group

Introduction. Ankle fractures are common injuries presenting to trauma departments and ankle open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is one of the first procedures targeted in early orthopaedic training. Failure to address the fracture pattern with the appropriate surgical technique and hardware may lead to early failure resulting in revision procedures or premature degenerative change. Patients undergoing revision ORIF are known to be at much greater risk of complications, and many of these secondary procedures may be preventable. Method. A retrospective analysis of all patients attending our unit for ankle ORIF over a two year period was undertaken. Patients were identified from our Bluespier database and a review of X rays was undertaken. All patients undergoing re-operation within eight weeks of the primary procedure were studied. The cause of primary failure was established and potential contributing patient and surgical factors were recorded. Results. 236 patients undergoing ankle ORIF were identified. 13 patients (5.5%) returned to theatre for a secondary procedure within eight weeks. Within this group, 7 (54%) patients returned for treatment of a neglected or under treated syndesmotic injury, 3 (23%) for complete failure of fixation, 2 (15%) with wound problems and 1 (8%) for medial malleoulus mal-reduction. Of the patient group, 5 (38%) were known type 2 diabetics. Consultants performed 2 (15%) of procedures, supervised registrars 5 (39%) and unsupervised registrars 6 (46%) operations. Conclusion. Errors are being made at all levels of training in applying basic principles such as restoring fibula length and screening the syndesmosis intra-operatively. Appropriate placement and selection of hardware is not always being deployed in osteopenic bone resulting in premature failure of fixation and fracture patterns are not being fully appreciated. Patients are undergoing preventable secondary procedures in the operative treatment of ankle fractures

We propose a model of care where by Regular scheduled outreach visits by a Single team provides more dependability of care and understanding of the local needs and cultural practises. Thereby titrating the care to meet local needs rather than enforcing the Western model of care to a very different cultural background. I have been fortunate as a SET 4 Registrar to be involved with an Outreach team to Latouka Hospital. Spear headed by Dr M McAuliffe over the last 3 years the annual visit has taken shape as a dependable way of providing care to the community of Latouka. The team has evolved over the years to involve Dr Brazel, Dr Tetsworth, Dr Bansi, and our scrub staff. The team consists of 2 teams which visit Latouka every 6 months and help institute a multimodal care plan. 1) Regularity of visits helps build confidence locally and engraves the foundations of dependability of care. 2) Difficult and complex cases are discussed in specially earmarked clinics held every 6 months providing a brain storming sessions to the local clinicians and helping them achieve the best care for the patients under the restrictions of the local infrastructure. 3) Regular teaching sessions / practical workshops are held for the registrars and junior doctors empowering them to carry the baton once the visiting team leaves. 4) Regular follow up of the patients operated upon is attained to titrate care to the locals based upon the local needs and cultural practises. 5) Helping the surgical teams, nurses, radiographers, physiotherapists formulate protocols of care and comparing them to the protocols used in Australia/NZ. 6) Creating an educational fund for the local registrars enabling them to attend observer ships and courses in Australia/New Zealand. We think that this model of care provides a much more organised and long term benefit to the local community compared to erratic visits by volunteer teams. A similar model of care, if instituted over many divisional hospitals of the South Pacific, will be vital in improving the health care needs of the locals and provide the local staff with the much needed support they deserve

Aims. The Wrightington classification system of fracture-dislocations of the elbow divides these injuries into six subtypes depending on the involvement of the coronoid and the radial head. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of this classification system. Methods. This was a blinded study using radiographs and CT scans of 48 consecutive patients managed according to the Wrightington classification system between 2010 and 2018. Four trauma and orthopaedic consultants, two post CCT fellows, and one speciality registrar based in the UK classified the injuries. The seven observers reviewed preoperative radiographs and CT scans twice, with a minimum four-week interval. Radiographs and CT scans were reviewed separately. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated using Fleiss and Cohen kappa coefficients. The Landis and Koch criteria were used to interpret the strength of the kappa values. Validity was assessed by calculating the percentage agreement against intraoperative findings. Results. Of the 48 patients, three (6%) had type A injury, 11 (23%) type B, 16 (33%) type B+, 16 (33%) Type C, two (4%) type D+, and none had a type D injury. All 48 patients had anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, 44 had 2D CT scans, and 39 had 3D reconstructions. The interobserver reliability kappa value was 0.52 for radiographs, 0.71 for 2D CT scans, and 0.73 for a combination of 2D and 3D reconstruction CT scans. The median intraobserver reliability was 0.75 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.62 to 0.79) for radiographs, 0.77 (IQR 0.73 to 0.94) for 2D CT scans, and 0.89 (IQR 0.77 to 0.93) for the combination of 2D and 3D reconstruction. Validity analysis showed that accuracy significantly improved when using CT scans (p = 0.018 and p = 0.028 respectively). Conclusion. The Wrightington classification system is a reliable and valid method of classifying fracture-dislocations of the elbow. CT scans are significantly more accurate than radiographs when identifying the pattern of injury, with good intra- and interobserver reproducibility. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1041–1047

Introduction. Surgical complications are common and most of them are preventable. Up to 70 % of surgical errors originate outside theatre and recent studies have shown that pre-op checklists can reduce such problems. We hypothesized that in our institution outcomes could be improved by introducing a safety checklist. Method. A modified multidisciplinary WHO safety checklist was introduced at our institution on the 1st March 2011. The primary focus was for elective patients admitted in all the units of the division. Prior to that all involved personnel (Consultants in Orthopaedics and Anaesthesia, Registrars in both departments, nursing staff in the wards and theatre and clerical staff) were fully oriented. To further ensure that everyone was familiar with the new checklist the whole month of March 2011 was used as a training month. We prospectively collected data from daily Mortality and Morbidity (MM) meetings by units from 1/1/2011 to 29/2/2011 (2 months). A pre-induction survey was completed by all Registrars. The same survey was given to the same registrars for comparison at the end of the 2 month implementation period in June 2011. Results. Only 77% of registrars acknowledged doing pre-op planning prior to implementation of the check list compared to 87.5% post implementation. There was also an increase from 50 to 71% of those who had heard of the surgical check list pre-implementation compared to post implementation. There were 35 cancellations before and 36 after implementation. However if one breaks them into unavoidable and avoidable groups there was 70% reduction of avoidable cancellations (from 10 to 3 patients). There was a 25% reduction of mortality and a 25% reduction of avoidable morbidity. Discussion. In our study there was significant increase in the percentage of registrars who were doing pre-op planning after the implementation of the modified WHO safety check list. The avoidable theatre case cancellations were significantly reduced. It is very hard to attribute the reduction of mortality in our studies to our checklist as the documented causes of death were unavoidable. Compared to published studies our numbers were relatively small but comparable to the SURPASS study which showed reduction of complications from 27.7 % to 16.7 %. The time for getting acquainted to the safety checklist was also very short (1 month) compared to other published studies. Conclusion. The implementation of the modified WHO safety check list was associated with reduction in cancellations, avoidable morbidity and mortality. It should be regarded as a standard practice for all orthopaedic procedures to decrease complications especially in high operation volume and training centres. NO DISCLOSURES

Frequently, radiological data is transferred verbally between ED/GP/LMO to the Orthopaedic registrar. Given the different medical backgrounds and presentation skills there is often a limit to the verbal description of the radiographs. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and benefits of concurrently using picture messaging of X-rays to enhance communication between ED and Orthopaedic Registrars to optimise patient care. The X-rays of 40 patients referred to orthopaedics OPD or admitted from the ED were photographed and retrospectively reviewed on a mobile phone screen (240 × 320) by an orthopaedic registrar along with a printout of the patient history and verbal description of the x-ray as interpreted by the ED staff. No further information was provided to the registrar. A questionnaire was completed to subjectively and objectively evaluate the therapeutic benefit of the image review. Patient(tm)s management was compared to management plans after image review and differences were attributed to the visual inspection of the x-rays on the mobile phone. Concurrent to the retrospective review, the ED is currently trialling this with a Sony-Erickson K750i. After hours orthopaedic cases are sent via MMS to the registrar prior to consultation. In the emergency department, 10% of patients who presented with a fracture were reviewed in person by an orthopaedics registrar and none were admitted straight from ED whilst two were admitted following review at the OPD. X-rays of 40 patients were reviewed in this study. Twenty-seven patients presented with a fracture and four with islocations. When the clinical data was reviewed alongside images of x-rays by an orthopaedic registrar, a difference in management plans were observed in 25% of cases and 7.5% where surgical intervention would yield a better result. Twenty-six of the twenty-seven fractures and four dislocations were successfully visualised on the MMS. In 18 cases, picture messaging provided additional information compared to verbal report alone. The limiting factor in picture messaging was the resolution and size of the radiograph. Ease of operation and portability was found to be satisfactory by both ED and Orthopaedic staff. Equipping the ED with the phone has enhanced communication with the orthopaedics department and increased the potential for optimising patient care. This will be formally assessed through questionnaires after 12 months trial of the phone. Picture messaging is an inexpensive way of utilising technical advancements to improve patient care. Consistent with current literature, the quality of images was not sufficient as a diagnostic tool but rather a screening tool. Picture messaging is valuable practically and educationally and enhances the consultation and teaching process whilst encompassing medical staff who have limited skills in radiological description

Clinical investigations and tests need to be validated by studying their inter-observer and intra-observer errors, but there has been no documentation of such verification in diagnostic knee arthroscopy. We performed a prospective study to find out to what extent the findings in knee arthroscopy differ between two different surgeons. Two senior specialist registrars (M.S. and A.J.) who took part in this study worked with the senior author (ACW) for a period of eight and seven months respectively. A total of 78 knee arthroscopies admitted from routine waiting list were studied. The specialist registrar first performed arthroscopy when the supervising consultant stayed away from the operating room. His findings were recorded on a proforma by an independent third person before the consultant returned to the operating room and repeated the EUA and arthroscopy without prior knowledge of the trainee findings. Findings from the consultant arthroscopy were then recorded separately on the same proforma. The following findings were recorded:. Examination under anaesthesia. Meniscal pathology. ACL pathology. Articular surface pathology (more than 1 Outer-bridge grade). The inter-observer variations in diagnostic knee arthroscopy were found to be high. Given the seniority and experience of the two trainee senior registrars involved in the study, and allowing for the Hawthorne effect, the results of the study cast doubt on this procedure being performed un-supervised. It also questions the validity of any therapeutic intervention based on the findings of un-supervised arthroscopies

Recent reports observe that orthopaedic surgeons lack essential knowledge about ionising radiation. We aim to demonstrate perceived use of image-intensifiers by surgeons and awareness of radiation doses used during fractured neck of femur surgery. Surgeons at a regional trauma centre were sent an online questionnaire. They were shown two neck of femur fracture radiographs and asked the total number of images they would use to reduce and fix the fracture with a dynamic-hip-screw / inter-medullary nail respectively. They were asked the maximum safe radiation dose, and that of ‘hip pining’ compared to CXR as outlined by the Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999. For a DHS, consultants and registrars estimate their image use similarly. For IM nailing, consultants estimated higher image use than registrars, and double the number of X-rays taken for IM nailing compared to DHS. Knowledge levels regarding radiation doses during orthopaedic hip procedures are very low. There is an expectation that more images will be used in IM nailing procedures. We plan to educate orthopaedic surgeons about radiation dose and safety. Correlating our findings with actual use of image in theatre when performing hip fracture surgery would extend the use of this study

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has established standards for radiation protection. This study aims to determine actual and perceived radiation dose and audit safe practice when using image-intensifiers in theatre. Between September 2012 and March 2013, 50 surgeons were surveyed during 39 procedures. Information collected by radiographers included the number of images the surgeons thought they used, actual number used, dose, screening time, number of people scrubbed, wearing thyroid collars and standing within 1m of the image-intensifier when in use. The primary surgeon was more likely to estimate the number of images used correctly compared to the assistant. Supervising consultants were most accurate, followed by registrars as primary surgeons, consultants as primary surgeons then assisting registrars, and lastly SHOs. Most surgeons underestimated the number of images used. 87.5% of scrubbed staff were standing within 1m of the image-intensifier during screening and 36.5% were wearing thyroid protection. Three surgeons stated they were not wearing collars as they were unavailable. We conclude that surgeons have a reasonable estimation of the x-rays used but are not undertaking simple steps to protect themselves from radiation. We plan to initiate an education program within the department and have ordered new, lightweight thyroid collars

Background. The gold standard of care of clubfoot is the Ponseti method of serial manipulation and casting, followed by percutaneous tendo-achilles tenotomy. In our setting, registrars work in district hospitals where they run Ponseti clubfoot clinics with little or no specialist supervision. They use the Pirani score to serially assess improvement of the deformity during casting and to determine whether the foot is ready for tenotomy. Purpose of Study. To test the inter-observer reliability of the Pirani score, and whether it can be used by non-specialist doctors running Ponseti clubfoot clinics. Methods. Ethics permission was obtained from our institution. This is a prospective study where patients under the age of one year with idiopathic clubfoot were recruited from clubfoot clinics at our institution, over a period of four months. Following a training session using the original description of the score, each foot was independently assessed using the Pirani score by two paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, two orthopaedic registrars and two medical officers. The inter-observer reliability was assessed using the Fixed-marginal Kappa statistic and Percentage agreement. The first 15 feet were used as a learning curve, and hence excluded from final analysis. Results. 73 feet in 37 patients with idiopathic clubfoot (25 boys, 12 girls) under the age of 1 year were included in the study. The Kappa statistic and percentage agreement for the six variables of the Pirani score were determined. Whilst the overall agreement was determined by the Kappa statistic to be slight to fair, the two consultants were found to have a higher inter-observer reliability than the registrars and medical officers. Conclusion. Our results conflict with previously published studies in that the inter-observer reliability of the Pirani score was poor. In addition, we feel that this score cannot be reliably used by non-specialist doctors running Ponseti clubfoot clinics. NO DISCLOSURES

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) published in the British volume of the JBJS from United Kingdom based institutes have been analysed to review the level of involvement of junior doctors over the past 25 years (1988 to 2012) which included three different training eras: Pre-Calman (1988 to 1995), Calman (1996 to 2006), and MMC (2007 to 2012). Authors were divided into: Senior doctors, Registrars, Fellows, Senior House Officers/ Foundation Doctors, and Others. The level of involvement has been identified as being first author, senior author or co-author. One hundred and fifty nine RCTs have been identified with a total of 705 authors. Eighty eight registrars, 32 fellows and 19 SHO/ Foundation doctors have been involved in RCT published over the last 25 years (19.7%). Registrars constituted 15% of all authors in the pre-Calman, 12% in the Calman and 11% in the MMC periods. They constituted 33% of all first authors in the pre-Calman, 21% in the Calman, and 12% in the MMC periods. With regards to SHO/ Foundation doctors, they were only 2% of all authors in the pre-Calman, 3% in the Calman, and 4% in the MMC periods. They were not the first author in any RCT in the pre-Calman period, rising to 7% in both the Calman and MMC periods. Our study shows that registrars involvement was at its highest in the pre-Calman era with gradual decline in their involvement in the subsequent training eras. SHO/Foundation doctors involvement remains very low, however showing increasing rate in the MMC era

Introduction. Hallux valgus is a common orthopaedic complaint with multiple surgical options. There are many methods available for assessing whether sufficient translation of the first metatarsal can be achieved with a metatarsal translational osteotomy alone. None of the current methods take into account the breadth of the metatarsal. With current PACS technology a radiograph can be zoomed to any size and we postulate that by using the surgeon's thumb (or any suitable digit), as a sizing tool, a safe clinical decision can be made concerning whether a translational metatarsal osteotomy alone will provide sufficient correction. Method. We reviewed the preoperative radiographs (weightbearing AP) of twenty patients who had scarf and akin osteotomies and twenty patients with a deformity too great for scarf and akin osteotomies. The senior author (CC) taught the rule of thumb to one consultant and two registrars (total two registrars and two consultants). The radiographs were blindly randomised and the participants assessed each radiograph and decided whether sufficient translation could be achieved with a translational metatarsal osteotomy alone. The process was repeated three months later. Twenty patients were deemed sufficient for intra-user variability and significance based on a recent JBJS(A) article concerning radiographic measurements post proximal crescentic osteotomy (Shima et al. 2009). Results. Good inter- and intra- user variability was demonstrated and using the rule of thumb is a safe way of determining whether a distal osteotomy alone will provide sufficient correction