Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and this has been linked to poor cementation technique. We aimed to develop a consensus on the optimal technique for component cementation in TKA. A UK based, three round, online modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study was completed focussing on cementation technique in TKA. Experts were identified as having a minimum of 5 years Consultant experience in the NHS and fulfilling any one of the following three criteria:
· A ‘high volume’ knee arthroplasty practice (>150 TKA per annum) as identified from the National joint registry (NJR). · A senior author of at least 5 peer reviewed articles related to TKA in the previous 5 years · A named trainer for a post CCT fellowship in TKA.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Higher than expected rates of tibial loosening with the ATTUNE® total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant has been reported. Component loosening can be associated with the development of radiolucency lines (RLL) and our study aim was to systematically assess the reported rates of these. A systematic search was undertaken using the Cochrane methodology in four online databases. Identified studies were assessed and screened against predetermined inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement consists of a trochlear component and a modular patellar component which has a metal-backed mobile polyethylene bearing. We present the early results of the use of this prosthesis for established isolated patellofemoral arthritis in 51 consecutive patellofemoral replacements in 35 patients. The mean follow-up was 25 months (5 to 60). The estimated survival rate at three years was 63% (95% confidence interval 47 to 80) with revision as the endpoint and 46% (95% confidence interval 30 to 63) with revision and ongoing moderate or severe pain as the endpoint. The early results of the use of the low contact stress patellofemoral replacement are disappointing with a high rate of revision. We cannot therefore recommend its use.
