Introduction

Component position and overall limb alignment following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to influence prosthetic survivorship and clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty has demonstrated improved accuracy to plan in cadaver studies compared to conventionally instrumented (manual) TKA, but less clinical evidence has been reported.

The objective of this study was to compare the three-dimensional accuracy to plan of RATKA with manual TKA for overall limb alignment and component position.

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to compare total and rate of caloric energy expenditure between conventional and robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between a high volume “veteran” surgeon (HV) and a lower volume, less experienced surgeon (LV).

Traditional risk factors for post-operative neuropathy include learning curve of surgical approach, DDH, and significant leg lengthening (>1 inch). Despite these risk factors, the most common scenario of a neuropathy is in a routine THA, by an experienced surgeon, for osteoarthritis, with no leg lengthening.

Post-operative hematoma can lead to nerve compression, albeit rarely. The usual clinical presentation is of an acute event, with a previously intact nerve, sometime within the first days of surgery. Once diagnosed, immediate surgical decompression should be performed.

Sciatic neuropathy is the most common, regardless of surgical approach, but the posterior approach poses the highest risk. Routine gluteus maximus tendon release may help to reduce the risk. When seen in the PACU, our approach is to immediately perform CT imaging to evaluate nerve integrity or to check on acetabular screw position. If no underlying cause is identified, the patient will be managed conservatively with foot orthotics and monitored for recovery.

Femoral nerve palsy (FNP) can result in significant initial disability. Fortunately most patients recover function (although it can take over 18 months). In the early post-operative period it is often diagnosed after a patient complains of the leg giving away while attempting to walk. A knee brace will assist the patient with mobilization while the nerve recovers. The highest incidence of FNP is described for the direct lateral approach.

Superior gluteal nerve (SGN) palsy is related to the direct lateral approach and may be avoided if the gluteus medius split is made within the safe zone (<5 centimeters from the tip of the greater trochanter). While early post-operative limp is common after the direct lateral approach, the true reported incidence of SGN palsy is low. Few studies showed that the persistent positive Trendelenburg test and limp is not exclusively related to the SGN damage and therefore the clinical effect of the SGN damage remains controversial.

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve can be affected during the direct anterior hip approach. One study suggests the presence of peri-incisional numbness in over 80% of patients. This is akin to numbness seen lateral to the incision after TKA. The incidence of meralgia paresthetica is extremely low (<1%).

Modern modular revision stems employ tapered conical (TCR) distal stems designed for immediate axial and rotational stability with subsequent osseo-integration of the stem. Modular proximal segments allow the surgeon to achieve bone contact proximally with eventual ingrowth that protects the modular junction. The independent sizing of the proximal body and distal stem allows for each portion to obtain intimate bony contact and gives the surgeon the ability precisely control the femoral head center of rotation, offset, version, leg length, and overall stability.

The most important advantage of modular revision stems is versatility - the ability to manage ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). Used routinely, this allows the surgeon to quickly gain familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently master the use for all variety of situations. This also allows the operating room staff to become comfortable with the instrumentation and components. Additionally, the ability to use the stem in all bone loss situations eliminates intra-operative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly under-estimated pre-operatively or may change intra-operatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably. Paprosky 1 femoral defects can be treated with a primary-type stem for the most part. All other femoral defects can be treated with a TCR stem. Fully porous coated stems also work for many revisions but why have two different revision stem choices available when the TCR stems work for ALL defects?

The most critical advantage is the ability to separate completely the critical task of fixation from other important tasks of restoring offset, leg length, and stability. Once fixation is secured, the surgeon can concentrate on hip stability and on optimization of hip mechanics (leg length and offset). The ability to do this allows the surgeon to maximise patient functionality post-operatively. Modular tapered stems have TWO specific advantages over monolithic stems in this important surgical task. The proximal body size and length can be adjusted AFTER stem insertion if the stem goes deeper than the trial. Further, proximal/distal bone size mismatch can be accommodated. The surgeon can control the diameter of the proximal body to ensure proper bony apposition independent of distal fitting needs. If the surgeon believes that proximal bone ingrowth is important to facilitate proximal bone remodeling, modular TCR stems can more easily accomplish this.

The most under-appreciated advantage is the straightforward instrumentation system that makes the operation easier for the staff and the surgeon, while enhancing the operating room efficiency and reducing cost. Also, although the implant itself may result in more cost, most modular systems allow for a decrease in inventory requirements, which make up the cost differential.

One theoretical disadvantage of modular revision stems is modular junction fracture, which can happen if the junction itself is not protected by bone. Ensuring proximal bone support can minimise this problem. Once porous ingrowth occurs proximally, the risk of junction fracture is eliminated. Even NON-modular stems fracture when proximal bone support is missing. Another theoretical issue is modular junction corrosion but this not a clinical one, since both components are titanium. One can also fail to connect properly the two parts during surgery.

Despite the best of technique, when faced with a sub-capital or per-trochanteric fracture, inevitably there are failures of proximal fixation. These situations provide unique challenges for the reconstructive surgeon.

While there are specific issues related to either sub-capital or per-trochanteric fractures, there also are many commonalities. The causes of failure are nonunion, malunion, failure of fixation or avascular necrosis. In all cases, it is imperative to rule out infection. Since the surgery is now elective, the patient's medical status must be optimised prior to the intervention.

Basic surgical principles apply to both fracture types. Use the old incision (if possible) and choose an approach that can be extensile. Of course, the old hardware needs to be removed – this task can be quite frustrating, so good preparation and patience is imperative. Retrieve old operative notes to identify the type of hardware so that any special tools needed are available. Hardware can be intra-osseous in location and excavation of the hardware may require bone osteotomy. These patients are at higher risk of post-operative dislocation, so absolute hip stability must be achieved and confirmed in the OR. Bigger heads and dual mobility options improve stability provided that the components are properly positioned and offset and leg length are restored.

Subcapital fractures provide certain specific issues related to stem choice. While, my bias is towards THA because of better chance of complete pain relief, especially in community ambulators, certainly bipolar arthroplasties can be a satisfactory solution. Stem fixation can be either cemented or cementless.

For per-trochanteric fractures in younger patients, repeat osteosynthesis should be considered if the femoral head is viable. Bone deformity – trochanteric overhang, shaft offset – may necessitate an osteotomy as part of the reconstruction. While proximal fixation primary type stems are often possible, distal fixation revision stems may be required. Any bone defects related to screw holes should be bypassed by the femoral component.

Despite the best of technique when faced with a sub-capital or per-trochanteric fracture, inevitably there are failures of proximal fixation. These situations provide unique challenges for the reconstructive surgeon.

While there are specific issues related to either sub-capital or per-trochanteric fractures, there also are many commonalities. The causes of failure are nonunion, malunion, failure of fixation or avascular necrosis. In all cases, it is imperative to rule out infection. Since the surgery is now elective, the patient's medical status must be optimised prior to the intervention. Basic surgical principles apply to both fracture types. Use the old incision (if possible) and choose an approach that can be extensile. Of course, the old hardware needs to be removed – this task can be quite frustrating, so good preparation and patience is imperative. Retrieve old OP notes to identify the type of hardware so that any special tools needed are available. Hardware can be intra-osseous in location and excavation of the hardware may require bone osteotomy. These patients are at higher risk of postoperative dislocation, so absolute hip stability must be achieved and confirmed in the OR. Bigger heads and dual mobility options improve stability provided that the components are properly positioned and offset and leg length are restored.

Subcapital fractures provide certain specific issues related to stem choice. While, my bias is towards total hip arthroplasty because of better chance of complete pain relief, especially in community ambulators, certainly bipolar arthroplasties can be a satisfactory solution. Stem fixation can be either cemented or cementless.

For per-trochanteric fractures in younger patients, repeat osteosynthesis should be considered if the femoral head is viable. Bone deformity – trochanteric overhang, shaft offset – may necessitate an osteotomy as part of the reconstruction. While proximal fixation primary type stems are often possible, distal fixation revision stems may be required. Any bone defects related to screw holes should be bypassed by the femoral component.

My goal for every patient undergoing THA is to achieve a perfect result. At the very least this includes no pain at any time, normal range of motion, normal functionality and a minimal chance of a second operation. Both the Posterolateral Approach (PLA) and the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) have the capability of achieving these important goals.

However, when you dive deeper into the goal of a “perfect” THA, some differences between the approaches become apparent. These include less muscle damage, faster recovery, and no restrictions at any time with the DAA as opposed to the PLA. Also there is some evidence of better wound healing (Poehling) and less chance of thromboembolic disease with the DAA (Stryker).

The PLA violates all posterior structures of the hip joint, and specifically also goes through the gluteus maximus muscle. Done properly, the DAA spares all the gluteal muscles, and all of the posterior muscles about the hip. Bergin, who demonstrated lower levels of creatine kinase using the DAA vs PLA, has provided evidence of lower muscle damage.

Faster recovery patterns have been well documented after DAA (Christen, Taunton). Part of this may be related to not needing hip precautions after DAA, while PLA patients are restricted in certain activities and positions in the postoperative period, because of the violation of the posterior capsule. Not having any restrictions enhances patient confidence, and patients tend to do more activities sooner with less reluctance and a subsequent faster recovery.

It is my belief that DAA problems (outside the learning curve) are related to the dependence upon special tables and fluoroscopy, as opposed to proper exposure, to perform a DAA. If you don't test hip stability in the OR, you will miss subtle impingement that can lead to postoperative dislocation. If you depend upon fluoroscopy to guide acetabular reaming (without proper exposure), you run the risk of over-reaming or asymmetric reaming with dire consequences. If you don't measure leg length directly, but rely on fluoroscopic measurements, you run the risk of inadvertent leg lengthening.

Revision hip surgery is about simplification. As such, a single revision stem makes sense. The most important advantage of Tapered Conical Revision (TCR) stem is versatility - managing ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). The surgeon and team quickly gain familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently master its use for a variety of situations. This ability to use the stem in a variety of bone loss situations eliminates intraoperative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly underestimated preoperatively or may change intraoperatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably.

Paprosky 1 femoral defects can be treated with a primary-type stem for the most part. All other femoral defects can be treated with a TCR stem. Fully porous coated stems also work for many revisions but why have two different revision stem choices available when the TCR stems work for ALL defects?

TCR stems can be modular or monolithic but there are common keys to success. First and foremost, proper exposure is essential to assess bone defects and to safely prepare the femur. An extended osteotomy is often useful. Reaming distally to prepare a cone for fixation of the conical stem is a critical requirement to prevent subsidence (true for all revision stems). Restoration of hip mechanics (offset, leg length and stability) is fundamental to the clinical result. TCR stems have instrumentation and techniques that ensure this happens, since all this occurs AFTER distal stability is achieved.

Modular TCR versions have some advantages. The proximal body size and length can be adjusted AFTER stem insertion if the stem goes deeper than the trial. Any proximal/distal bone size mismatch can be accommodated. If the surgeon believes that proximal bone ingrowth is important to facilitate proximal bone remodeling, modular TCR stems can more easily accomplish this. Further, proximal bone contact and osseointegration will protect the modular junction from stress and possible risk of fracture.

Monolithic TCR versions also have some advantages. Modular junction mechanical integrity cannot accommodate smaller bone sizes. Shorter stem lengths are not available in modular versions, and shorter TCR stems are an option in many revision cases. The possibility of modular junction corrosion is eliminated and fracture of the stem at that junction, of course, is not possible. The monolithic stem option is less expensive as well.

Consider Modular TCR stems in your learning curve, if you feel proximal bone osseointegration is important and if proximal/distal size mismatch is present. Consider Monolithic TCR stems after your learning curve to reduce cost, when a short stem works, and if a small stem is needed.

Both Modular and Monolithic stems can be used for ALL cases with equal quality of result.

Dual mobility (DM) cups have 2 points of articulation – between the shell and the polyethylene (external bearing) and between the polyethylene and the femoral head (internal bearing). Primary motion occurs at the inner bearing while the outer bearing moves only in cases of extreme range of motion.

Dislocation is a top reason for revision surgery and a major cost burden on society. Instability is also a significant problem after revision THA. While a variety of factors are important in hip stability, DM cups provide the safety of larger femoral heads in virtually all patients. These larger heads increase jump distance (the distance the femoral must travel before dislocation occurs) and they also increase ROM before impingement occurs.

ROM and impingement are competing with each in primary THA. Especially in the flexible female with small bone structure, their increased ROM significantly increases the risk of impingement during physiologic activities. While not necessarily leading to dislocation, subluxation can occur resulting in pain. Further, ongoing impingement reduces the longevity of the PE. The ability to increase head size and head-neck ration with the DM cups in these patients is both an immediate and long-term advantage.

PE thickness still can compromise the integrity of the liner. DM cups have thicker PE, especially in the smaller size cups than standard PE inserts. Even with the dual articulation, PE wear in DM cups are less, or at worst, equivalent to standard cups while at the same time providing adequate PE thickness for PE integrity and longevity.

The most important advantage of modular revision stems is versatility - managing ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). The surgeon quickly gains familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently masters its use for all variety of situations. This allows the operating room staff to become comfortable with the instrumentation and components. This ability to use the stem in a variety of bone loss situations eliminates intraoperative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly under-estimated preoperatively or may change intraoperatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably.

The most critical advantage is the ability to separate completely the critical task of fixation from other important tasks of restoring offset, leg length, and stability. Once fixation is secured, the surgeon can concentrate on hip stability and on optimization of hip mechanics (leg length and offset). This allows the surgeon to maximise patient functionality postoperatively. Additionally, the surgeon can control the diameter of the proximal body to ensure proper bony apposition, especially if an extended trochanteric osteotomy was made to obtain femoral exposure.

The most under-appreciated advantage is the straightforward instrumentation that makes the operation easier for the staff and the surgeon, while enhancing the operating room efficiency and reducing cost. Also, although the implant itself may result in more cost, most modular systems allow for a decrease in inventory requirements, which make up the cost differential.

INTRODUCTION

While standard instrumentation tries to reproduce mechanical axes based on mechanical alignment guides, a new “shape matching” system derives its plan from kinematic measurements using pre-operative MRIs. The current study aimed to compare the resultant alignment in a matched pair cadaveric study between the Shape Match and a standard mechanical system.

In minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty double offset broach handles are used, in order to facilitate the preparation of the femoral canal. The maximum value of the main force peak and the impulse of two types of double offset broach handles (A European version, B American version) were compared to a single offset broach handle (S). Results have demonstrated that the highest values of the main force peak and force impulse were found in the single offset broach handle. Broach handle A had higher impulse values and lower maximum force values compared to broach handle B. In double offset broach handles less energy is transmitted to the tip. Broach handle A has a lower force peak than B and therefore a reduced risk of bone fracture.

This multicentre study analysed 12 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic components retrieved from squeaking total hip replacements after a mean of 23 months in situ (11 to 61). The rates and patterns of wear seen in these squeaking hips were compared with those seen in matched controls using retrieval data from 33 ‘silent’ hip replacements with similar ceramic bearings. All 12 bearings showed evidence characteristic of edge-loading wear. The median rate of volumetric wear was 3.4 mm³/year for the acetabular component, 2.9 mm³/year on the femoral heads and 6.3 mm³/year for head and insert combined. This was up to 45 times greater than that of previously reported silent ceramic-on-ceramic retrievals. The rate of wear seen in ceramic components revised for squeaking hips appears to be much greater than in that seen in retrievals from ‘silent’ hips.

The current decade has seen a marked rise in popularity of minimally invasive hip replacement, done through a variety of surgical approaches. A specific downside to the direct anterior approach includes the significant difficulty getting a “straight shot” down the femoral canal for either straight, nonflexible reaming or broaching as with standard approaches. Improper alignment in the femoral canal can lead to sub-optimal load transfer and thus compromised fixation. The femoral broach and stem insertion path for this approach is best described as a curved one, rather than the typical straight path. Some femoral components appear to be more suitable to this technique due to their geometries. The purpose of the study was to describe the effects that the single geometric parameter, stem length, has on its insertion path into the femoral canal. Due to the potential introduction of human error associated with repetitively performing a specific motion, both a physical study and a computer generated analysis were conducted.

For the physical portion of the study, a femoral implant body of generic fit and fill geometry was designed and manufactured. The length of the stem was varied from 40 mm to 100 mm in 10 mm increments. A medium sized synthetic femur (Sawbones, Pacific Labs, Seattle, WA) was machined to match the volume of the full length stem. The insertion path constraints were defined such that the stem had to maintain the greatest allowable insertion angle while still making contact on both the medial and lateral side of the canal during translation in the X direction. To reduce the variability in applying the constraints, a single author conducted the insertion procedure for each length stem while the path was videotaped from a fixed position directly in front of the setup. The most proximal lateral point of the stem was tracked through the insertion path and the X, Y coordinates were recorded at a frequency of 2 FPS. The area under this curve, referred to as the minimum insertion area (MIA), was calculated.

For the computer generated portion of the study, a CAD model of the standard length Omnifit^® (Stryker Orthopaedics) was utilized. The stem was modified to create 5 additional models where the length was progressively shortened to 65%, 55%, 45%, 35%, and 25% of original length or 91mm, 77mm, 63mm, 49mm, and 35mm respectively. The femur was created from a solidified mesh of a computed tomography (CT) scan with the canal virtually broached for a full length stem. The models were each virtually assembled within the femoral canal with the similar constraints as the physical study. Again, the most proximal lateral point of the stem was tracked through the insertion path with the coordinates recorded and the MIA was calculated.

There was a non-linear relationship between stem length and the MIA with the rate of change decreasing as the stem length decreased. That is, the greatest decrease in MIA was between the standard length and next longest length in the computer simulation. It was noted that marked change in MIA began to subside between the 77mm and 63mm stems and continued this trend of having less influence onward through to the shorter lengths. Although the results of the physical study showed a higher variability than the computer generated portion, it does confirm the results of the computer generated study.

Minimizing the trauma associated with THR has led most of the above authors to the direct anterior approach. However, the femoral broach and stem insertion path is best described as a curved one, rather than the typical straight path used in other approaches. This curved insertion path also has benefits for other approaches since the broaches and stem can be kept away from the abductors, minimizing the potential injury to them. Shorter stem length makes this curved insertion path easier to perform. This is the first study to describe the effect that stem length has on its insertion path into the femoral canal. As expected, the physical portion of the study showed more variability than the computer generated portion. However, the physical and computer studies correlated well, with shorter stem lengths clearly allowing a more curved insertion path. The improvement tapered off in stem lengths below 63mm. This length correlates well with the other attempts at a shorter stem. This study provides quantitative data to help with shorter stem design and possible computer navigated insertion paths.

Taper locking connection has been widely used in orthopedic implant devices. The long term successful clinical results indicated it is a safe and effective structural component. The common materials used are solid titanium and cobalt chromium alloys. Recently, foam metal materials showed promising results of bony in-growth characteristics and became the excellent choices for the orthopedic implants. Clinically it is desirable to taper lock the foam metal component to other structural components. To date there is no data for the foam metal being used directly in taper connection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the static locking strength of the taper junctions made of titanium foam metal comparing to that of conventional solid titanium material.

(5) 43mm long and 4mm thick sleeve were machined internally with 17mm major diameter and 3° included taper angle for each 70% porosity CP titanium foam metal and solid Ti6AL4VELI alloy materials. (10) Solid Ti6AL4VELI alloy stems were machined with OD geometry matching the ID of the sleeves. All components were inspected, cleaned and assembled to (5) pairs of each sleeve material combinations with 2224N axial compression force. Each assembled specimen was mounted on MTS Bionix test machine for torque resistance test. The angular displacement at 0.1 degree/sec was applied to the stem when sleeve was rotationally locked. The maximum torque resistance was recorded. The specimen was then re-assembled with 2224N axial compression force. Axial push out test was performed by loading at smaller end of the stem when the opposite end of sleeve was supported. The maximum push out force was recorded. Procedures were repeated for all foam metal and solid metal specimens. The taper interface surfaces were visually inspected to compare two types of sleeve materials.

The average torque resistance for foam metal and solid tapers were 20.4Nm (SD=3.68) and 21.7Nm (SD=3.72) respectively (p=0.59). The average axial locking forces were 2035.7N (SD=201.11) for foam metal taper and 1989.3N (SD= 451.84) for solid taper (p=0.839). There was no visual difference observed for tested stem outer and sleeve inner surfaces of foam metal and solid metal pairs.

This study suggested that the foam metal sleeve is capable to have comparable taper locking strength as the conventional solid taper components under dry static condition. The study indicated that the contact area does not significantly influence the friction locking. This is in agreement with the friction force definition which depends only on the coefficient of friction and normal contact force.

Currently two-stage resection arthroplasty is the preferred method for surgical treatment of periprosthetic infection in North America. However, the success of this treatment strategy has varied from 54% to 98% based on previous reports. The exact reason for this variation in outcome is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of this treatment modality and delineate patient risk factors that result in recurrent infection and failure.

During the period of this study (2000–2005) 77 patients with an infected THA were treated at our institution. Fifty-four patients underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty while the remaining 22 failed to have the second stage reimplantation due to ill health. The latter 22 were excluded from the analysis. All patients were followed up prospectively for at least two years after reimplantation. Detailed data including demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and medication intake was collected. Intraoperative data, organism profile, and complications were also documented. Failure was defined as patient requiring additional surgical procedure for control of infection or loosening.

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty successfully eradicated infection in 36 patients (67%) without need for further treatment. Seven patients (13%) had recurrent infection that necessitated resection arthroplasty. Eleven (20%) patients required irrigation and debridement for postoperative purulent drainage which successfully treated infection in 8 of the cases. The remaining 3 patients failed and required resection arthroplasty. Three additional patients had early loosening of components and required revision arthroplasty. The exact cause of loosening in these patients could not be determined and despite lack of isolation of organisms infection was suspected. Multivariate analysis identified previous medical comorbidity and postoperative allogenic transfusion as risk factors for failure.

Current strategies to treat periprosthetic infection remain imperfect. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty with all its inherent problems and inconveniences imparted a modest success in treatment of PPI at our high volume specialized center. With the increase in the number of virulent and resistant organisms, and the rise in arthroplasties being performed in infirm patients with medical comorbidities the success of this procedure is likely to be jeopardized. Novel treatment modalities to combat this dreaded condition is needed.

Debridement of an infected total joint arthroplasty with retention of mechanically stable components is often performed for acute cases of periprosthetic infection (PPI). However, the reported success of such a procedure to fully eradicate infection has varied widely. The objective of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of debridement in both infected THA and TKA and attempt to identify risk factors responsible for failure.

During the years 2000–2005, 71 TKA and 69 THA underwent irrigation and debridement for acute PPI (< 4 weeks). All patients were followed up prospectively for at least two years. Detailed data including demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and medication intake was collected. Intraoperative data, organism profile, and complications were also documented. Failure was defined as patient requiring additional surgical procedure for control of infection or loosening.

Of the 140 patients, 24% required repeat irrigation and debridement for postoperative drainage, hema-toma formation, or systemic symptoms. One third of these revision debridement patients underwent multiple consecutive debridements. Two-stage resection arthroplasty was required in 65 patients (46%) of the entire cohort. Fifty-eight percent of the patients with resection required revision of their cement spacer block due to continuous drainage and systemic symptoms indicative of persistent infection. We noted a total of 86 failures (61%) that required either an additional debridement or resection arthroplasty after the first debridement procedure. The failure rates of THA (62%) and TKA (55%) individually were similar (p=0.253).

Although the concept of conservative management of PPI with debridement and retention of components is an attractive alternative to resection arthroplasty, we have found that 60% of patients undergoing this procedure will inevitably undergo two-stage arthroplasty. Furthermore, more than half of the patients that required resection arthroplasty developed infection of their spacer that entailed revision of the cement block. Therefore, we can conclude that this procedure has a high failure rate and should be implemented in only a select group of patients.

Periprosthetic infection (PPI) is one of the most devastating complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is widely accepted that resection arthroplasty supplemented with intravenous antibiotics and delayed exchange arthroplasty is the treatment modality of choice for infected TKA. However, the outcome after reimplantation has varied and unpredictable results have been reported. This study evaluates the outcome of this treatment strategy in a single high volume specialised center. Furthermore, our study aims to identify the factors that lead to failure of this treatment.

A thorough review of our joint registry database revealed that 80 patients with an infected TKA underwent resection arthroplasty at our institution during 2000–2005. Sixty-five patients underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty while the remaining 15 failed to have the second stage reimplantation due to ill health or underwent arthrodesis or amputation. The latter 15 were excluded from the analysis. All patients were followed up prospectively for at least two years. Detailed data including demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and medication intake was collected. Intraoperative data, organism profile, and complications were also documented. Failure was defined as patient requiring additional surgical procedure for control of infection or loosening.

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty successfully eradicated infection in 45 patients (31%) without need for further treatment. Twelve patients (18%) had recurrent infection that necessitated another resection arthroplasty. Eleven (17%) patients required irrigation and debridement for postoperative purulent drainage which successfully treated infection in 5 cases (46%). The remaining 6 patients failed and required resection arthroplasty. Three additional patients had early loosening of components and required revision arthroplasty. The exact cause of loosening in these patients could not be determined, and despite lack of isolation of organisms infection was suspected. Our analysis identified that irrigation and debridement prior to resection arthroplasty are major risk factors for failure.

Current strategies to treat periprosthetic infection remain imperfect. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty with all its inherent problems and inconveniences imparted a modest success in treatment of PPI at our high volume specialised center. The rise in the number of resistant and virulent organisms, increase in the number of patients with severe medical comorbidities who develop infection may account for the decline in the success of two-stage resection arthroplasty. Novel strategies for treatment of PPI are desperately needed.

Background: Vascular injuries associated with total joint arthroplasty are the most feared complication. The arterial and venous injury can occur due to direct or indirect trauma. A high index of suspicion, recognition of the injury and prompt treatment, with the immediate availability of a vascular surgeon is vital for good outcome.

Methods: Using prospectively collected data on 13624 patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at our institution, all incidences of vascular injury were identified. Detailed data regarding the mode of presentation, the type and the outcome of intervention delivered, and the eventual functional outcome of the total joint arthroplasty were determined.

Results: There were a total of 17 vascular injuries (0.1%). Majority (16/17) of these vascular injuries were detected in the postoperative recovery area. 9 injuries occurred after TKA and 8 occurred after THA. Indirect injury was the mechanism in TKA patients with popliteal artery thrombosis being the mechanism. In contrast direct injury was the mechanism in THA patients. Fasciotomy was performed in all TKA patients and none were needed in the THA patients. One patient died of complications related to vascular injury. 12 of 17 patients (70%) had launched a legal suit against the operating surgeon.

Conclusions: After more than 80 years of accumulated experience and more than 35000 joint replacements performed by 5 surgeons in our center, the vascular complication still continues to occur. Patient awareness regarding this real problem may play a role in defraying the extremely high likelihood of legal suits associated with this complication.

Squeaking is a rare complication of hard-on-hard hip bearings. Occasionally the noise is troublesome enough to warrant revision surgery. The purpose of this study is to contribute to the understanding of the mechanism(s) underlying squeaking.

We analyzed 10 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings from squeaking hips collected at revision surgery. The reason for revision was given as squeaking (6 cases) or squeaking and pain (4 cases). Six of the 10 patients were male, average patient age was 48. Bearings were retrieved after an average of 23 months in service (11 to 61 months). There were 4 different designs of acetabular component from 2 different manufacturers. Nine have an elevated metal rim which is proud of the ceramic and one does not. Two bearings were 36mm in diameter, 6 were 32mm and 2 were 28mm.

All 10 bearings showed evidence of edge loading wear. Mean dimensions of the wear patch were 37mm by 12mm on the acetabular component and 32mm by 13mm on the femoral heads. Wear dimension was not related to bearing diameter. Seven of the 10 implants also had evidence of impingement of the femoral neck against the elevated metallic rim or the ceramic insert or both. There was no chipping or fracture of any of the ceramic components.

Squeaking is a recently recognized complication of hard on hard bearing surface. This retrieval study is the first of its kind, to our knowledge attempting to unravel the mechanism of this undesirable complication. Although impingement seems to be present in majority of cases, the latter does not seem to be necessary. Edge loading wear was the common factor in all cases and this may prove to be a critical mechanism.

Introduction: The potential benefits of Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (MIS THA) continues to be heavily debated. We hypothesized that the potential benefits of MIS THA may relate to factors such as patient selection, patient preconditioning, improvements in anesthesia technique, pain management, and not the incision size. This randomized, prospective study was designed to investigate the role of these confounding factors in general and aggressive rehabilitation in particular on the outcome of THA.

Methods: 100 patients undergoing THA at our institution were randomized into one of four groups. Group A was patients who had standard THA (incision length> 10 cm) and received standard preoperative and postoperative care. Group B patients had THA using small incision (< 10 cm) and standard protocols. Group C patients had regular incision THA, but received aggressive rehabilitation and pain control regimen. Group D patients had THA through small incision and received aggressive regimen.

Results: The demographic distribution amongst all the groups was similar. There was a significant improvement in function as measured by Harris Hip Score, LASA (validated rehabilitation score), SF-36, and lower extremity function test in all groups. The extent of functional improvement, home discharge, patient satisfaction, and analgesia requirement was better in patients who received aggressive preoperative and postoperative care regimen regardless of the size of their incision. There was no difference in estimated blood loss, mean operative time, transfusion needs, and complications between the groups.

Discussion: This study highlights the importance of family education, patient conditioning, pre-emptive analgesia, and aggressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation in influencing the outcome of THA. The aforementioned factors, and perhaps not the surgical technique per se, may play a major role in imparting advantageous outcome to MIS THA that is reported by various investigators.

INTRODUCTION: Range of motion following TKA is a commonly assessed and important outcome parameter. The reported knee ROM is often measured using manual goniometers. The accuracy of goniometer in measuring ROM of the knee is not known. We compared the knee ROM measured with a manual goniometer and compared that to measurements obtained from computer assisted navigation system.

METHODS: This prospective ongoing study has so far recruited 60 patients (71 knees) undergoing TKA by a single surgeon. Measurements of the ROM were performed intraoperatively using a 14 inch 360° Nexgen Baseline® goniometer, validated by physical therapists, and the Stryker knee navigation system^™. Consistent anatomical landmarks were used to obtain flexion and extension measurements. Each goniometer and navigation measurement was performed twice by the same reader.

RESULTS: Goniometer was more inaccurate in measuring the knee ROM than the navigation. There was a 5.07° difference between two measurements obtained with the goniometer compared to a mean discrepancy of 1.15° using the navigation system. Further, the ROM measured by navigation was on average 13.9° larger than that measured by the goniometer. BMI affected the ROM recording obtained by both the goniometer and the navigation system.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study indicates that goniometer is not an accurate tool for measurements of knee ROM as there is a marked discrepancy between two goniometer readings. The navigation system seemed to produce more consistent, but markedly higher, readings than a manual goniometer. Reported results on knee ROM in the literature need to be interpreted with caution and scrutinized for potential inaccuracy of the measuring tool.

Background: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a successful procedure. With the demographic tendency towards an elderly society and a relatively high prevalence of arthritis, the number of joint replacement in the US will increase dramatically in the upcoming years. The orthopaedic surgeons need to be aware of the various types of complications in the early hospital setting associated with elective TJA.

Methods: This prospective study reviewed the systemic and local early complications occurring after 13133 TJA which included 7,438 hip arthroplasties (6,010 primary and 1,428 revisions) and 5,695 knee replacements (4,944 primary and 751 revisions). A standardized and detailed form intended to capture all medical and orthopedic complications was devised, plus a full-time research fellow was dedicated to this study. The hospital course of every patient was followed on a daily basis closely. The circumstances leading to the complications and the details of the therapeutic intervention for each complication were recorded.

Results: In general the incidences of complications were higher following TKA compared to THA. There was 26(0.19%) deaths in the cohort that occurred within 10 days after surgery. 329 major (life threatening) complications occurred in the cohort that included myocardial infarction (36), hypotensive crisis (11), pulmonary embolus (145), tachyarrhythmia (93), pulmonary edema (10), acute renal failure (24), stroke (6), bowel obstruction or perforation (3), and pneumothroax (1). There were 37 major local complications. 301 (91%) of these complications occurred within 4 days of index surgery. There were 453 minor systemic complications, mostly related to anemia, and 99 minor local complications in this cohort.

Conclusions: Total joint arthroplasty despite its success can be associated with serious and life threatening complications. The introduction of MIS surgery and the potential for very early discharge of patients undergoing arthroplasty needs to be scrutinized in light of these findings.

Introduction: Management of bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be challenging. The degree and location of bone loss often dictates the type of prosthesis that can be utilized during revision surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to determine if plain radiographs are adequate in assessing the degree of bone loss around TKA and identify the limitations of plain radiographs for this purpose, if any.

Methods: 205 patients undergoing revision TKA at our institution were included. The indication for revision was aseptic failure in 120 patients and septic failure in the remaining patients. The plain radiographs were evaluated by a research fellow and the attending surgeon. The degree and the location of bone loss around the TKA was determined using the UPenn Bone Loss chart. The degree of real bone loss was then determined intraoperatively.

Results: The predicted amount of bone loss for the tibia based on the AP (p=0.136) and lateral (p=0.702) radiographs correlated well with the intraoperative findings. However, plain radio-graphs underestimated the degree of bone loss around femur, particularly the condyles (p=0.005).

Discussion: Reconstructive surgeons performing revision TKA need to be aware of the limitations of routine radiographs in assessing the degree of bone loss around the femoral component. Hence, patients undergoing revision TKA with suspected bone loss may need to be evaluated by additional imaging techniques and/or alternative reconstructive options need to be available to deal with greater than expected degree of bone loss intraoperatively.

We report the early failure, at a mean of 37 months, of 17 femoral prostheses due to aseptic loosening at the cement-bone interface. In every case the prosthesis had been manufactured with a surface coating designed to enhance the strength of the cement-prosthesis interface. It is postulated that improving the bond at the cement-prosthesis interface may transfer increased stress to the cement-bone interface and cause early failure at that interface.