Because of concerns regarding excessive wear and short-term failures attributed to the metal-on-metal bearings, the use of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MOMHRA) has been greatly reduced since 2008, despite great mid-term results for well-designed implants and in certain patient populations. The true cause of excessive wear was then unknown. Therefore, identification of true risk factors for the procedure became paramount to refine indications and improve survivorship outcomes. Over the last 10 years, a systematic search of the US national library of Medicine and National institutes of health with the key words “metal-on-metal” and hip resurfacing” was conducted and returned 2186 items. Of these items, 862 were deemed relevant to our research purposes and entered in our center's reference database from which this review was performed.Introduction
Methods
Recently, monoblock cups have increased in popularity for hip resurfacing and large femoral head total hips. However, there have been no studies specifically evaluating the durability of this type of cup. The purpose of this study was to define the mid-term survivorship of cobalt-chrome alloy, monoblock acetabular components. A retrospective radiographic review of 426 consecutive hip resurfacings using the ConserveÒPlus prosthesis was performed with specific attention to the acetabular component. Radiographs were analyzed for cup position, the presence of radiolucencies, cup migration, bead shedding, osteolysis and stress remodeling of the pelvic bone. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates were calculated using revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component as the end point. Average follow-up was 8.6 years (range 5.4 to 12.3). Mean abduction angle and anteversion angle were 46.6° (± 6.8°), and 21.6° (± 8.6°), respectively. Radiolucent gaps behind the cup from incomplete seating were visible in zone 2 in 16% of cases. These were typically 1 to 2 mm in size and radiographically filled in all but 2 cases. No cups with early lucencies went on to fail. Late radiolucencies developed in zone 1 in 8 cups (1.9%), in zone 2 in 8 cups (1.9%), and in zone 3 in 19 cups (4.5%). Radiolucencies in multiple zones were seen in 6 cups (1.4%). Small amounts of socket migration (2mm or less) were suspected in 3 cups (0.7%) but each of these has remained stable. There were no cases of bead shedding. Small osteolytic lesions were suspected in 12 hips (2.8%). There were 2 revisions for aseptic loosening of the cup at 5 and 8 years, and one revision for protrusion of the cup through the medial wall 4 days after surgery. Additionally, one cup at 9 years follow-up is believed to be loose but has yet to be revised. The KM survival estimate was 99.6% at 5 years (95% C.I. 98.4% to 99.9%) and 98.7% at 10 years (95% C.I. 94.5% to 99.7%). In conclusion, this study demonstrates excellent mid-term survivorship of a cobaltchrome alloy monoblock acetabular component, which matches that of conventional titanium implants. Small early gaps seen behind the cup from incomplete seating do not appear to effect cup survivorship as long as a good peripheral press-fit is obtained. Osteolysis with this prosthesis is rare but does occur.
Ion levels in the serum and urine of patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants can provide a means to monitor bearing wear. This presentation will discuss the current results, now out to 5 years for the Conserve Plus resurfacing. In particular, the effect of bilateral implantation on ion levels was examined Forty-eight patients were studied. Forty-three of these cases were initially implanted with a unilateral resurfacing. Nine of these cases subsequently were implanted with a resurfacing implant on the contra-lateral side 4 to 48 months following the first implantation (staged implantations). Five cases had bilateral resurfacings done simultaneously. All surgeries were done in one institution by a single surgeon. Serum and urine samples were collected pre-operatively, and at 4 months, 12 months and annually thereafter. The samples were analysed for cobalt and chromium using atomic absorption spectrometry with a detection limit of 0.3 to 0.03ng/ml respectively. The data were compared between the groups and also correlated with UCLA activity scores, cup angle, BMI and component size. All patients showed a rise in ions following implantation. The simultaneous bilateral levels were higher at all time periods compared with the staged bilaterals monitored at the same time point for the second hip, for example cobalt serum at 12 month uni = 2.24, simultaneous bilat = 2.53, staged bilat = 2.05ng/ml, and at 4 years uni = 1.20, simultaneous bilat = 2.93, staged bilat = 2.27ng/ml. There was no correlation between ion levels and UCLA activity score, gender, component size or cup angle (but only 4 hips had cups >
55 degrees). Bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacings performed simultaneously resulted in higher levels of metal ions, particularly chromium, compared to staged implantations monitored at the same time periods. With the exception of a small number of outliers, the levels in this group of hip resurfacings were within the range of metal levels reported for other metal-on-metal total hips.
Femoral neck fracture is a common short-term hip resurfacing failure mode, but later term fractures are starting to be reported. The fracture pattern may indicate whether etiology is primarily mechanical or biological Central 3mm thick coronal slices were cut from each of 50 cemented and 2 cementless fractured femoral components (27 males, 25 females). Fracture patterns were grouped as: “edge to edge”, “inside head”, “outside” and “edge to outside”1. Sections were decalcified and processed for routine histology to examine viability and remodelling. Bone viability was judged on the presence of osteocyte nuclei. Components were judged to be unseated if the cement mantle was more than twice the manufacturers recommended thickness. Histological and clinical data were correlated with fracture pattern. Overall average time to fracture was 6 months (1–85 months). There were 25 “edge to edge”, 12 “inside head”, 4 “outside” and 11 “edge to outside” fractures, which occurred after a median of 2.0, 13, 1.5, and 2.0 months respectively. The majority of the heads were viable, and the fractures occurred through a region of healing bone involving one or both edges. Fifteen heads with a substantial proximal avascular segment fractured at the interface between necrotic and viable bone, typically inside the component. Eleven implants (21%) were considered unseated. All 4 “outside” fractures were found to be unseated. All “inside head” fractures were seated, but 83% (10/12) of them were found to be avascular. The latest failure (85 months) occurred in association with wear-induced osteolysis. Both cementless components fractured early with an “edge to outside” pattern and were found to be substantially avascular. Avascular heads failed from one month to four years, usually inside the component. Viable heads tended to fracture early through an area of healing bone at or below the rim. Most fractures were technical failure-sand might be avoided with better patient selection and surgical technique.
Eighty-three patients (ninety hips) with well-fixed cementless socket retained during revision of a femoral component were reviewed. At revision, 33% of patients had acetabular osteolysis and 52% were grafted. At mean follow-up 9.6 years (5.5 – 15.9) after femoral revision and 14.8 years (7.1–20.2) after primary arthroplasty, survivorship was 96.5% (95% CI, 91.5% to 100%) at five years and 81%(95% CI, 61% to 99%) at ten years after femoral revision. Revision of a cementless acetabular component solely on the basis of the duration that it was Removal a well fixed cementless acetabular component can result in an increased operative morbidity. Data that can be used to predict the long-term survival of retained well-fixed cementless acetabular components are therefore needed. Retention of the well-fixed cementless acetabular component during femoral revision is a predictable technique. Revision of a cementless acetabular component solely on the basis of the duration that it was Eighty-three consecutive patients (ninety hips) in whom a well-fixed cementless socket had been retained during revision of a femoral component were reviewed. Mean patient age was fifty-four. At the time of revision, 33% of the patients had acetabular osteolysis of which 52% were grafted. At a mean follow-up 9.6 years (5.5 – 15.9) after femoral revision and 14.8 years (7.1–20.2) after primary arthroplasty, 94.5% of the sockets remained in place. With any revision as end point, survivorship was 96.5%(95% CI, 91.5% to 100%) at five years and 81%(95% CI, 61% to 99%) at ten years after femoral revision. With failure of cementless socket as end point (i.e. loosening, deficient locking mechanism), survivorship was 100% (95% CI, 100%) and 94% (95% CI, 82%–100%) at five and ten years after femoral revision and 100% (95% CI, 100%) and 94% (95% CI, 82%–100%) at ten and fifteen years after primary arthroplasty. No cases showed recurrence or expansion of pelvic osteolysis. The overall incidence of dislocation was 15%.
Ninety-four hips with a mean patient age 34.2 (range 15– 40) with a metal/metal surface arthroplasty (SA) were reviewed with 71% men and 14% with previous surgery. The Chandler risk index was calculated as well as the SA risk index (SARI). At a mean follow-up three years, three hips were converted at a mean of twenty-seven months (two to fifty), and ten patients had significant radiological changes. Mean SARI for the thirteen problematic hips versus remaining hips was significantly higher, 4.7 and 2.6, respectively (p=0.00). If SARI >
3 the relative risk of early problems is twelve times greater than if SARI ≤3. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early outcome of a hybrid metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip in patients forty years and younger and identify potential risk factors. Surface Arthroplasty Risk Index can help identify patients who may be at increased risk of early failure following metal on metal surface arthroplasty. Proper patient selection and careful surgical technique may minimize early failures with the re-introduction of surface arthroplasty of the hip. Ninety-four hips mean age 34.2 (range 15– 40) with metal/metal surface arthroplasty (SA) were reviewed with 71% men and 14% with previous surgery. The Chandler risk index was calculated and SA risk index (SARI). Mean follow-up three years (range 2–5), three hips were converted at a mean of twenty-seven months (2–50), and ten patients had significant radiological changes. Mean SARI for these thirteen problematic hips versus remaining hips was significantly higher, 4.7 and 2.6, respectively (p=0.00). The mean angle between the prosthesis stem and femoral shaft in the problematic group was significantly smaller than the remaining hips (p=0.03): 133° and 139°, respectively. If SARI >
3 the relative risk of early problems is twelve times greater than if SARI ≤3.
Fifty-six hips, mean age 40.4 underwent surface arthroplasty (SA) and twenty-eight hips, mean age 37.2 underwent hemiresurfacing (HSR). Diagnosis was osteo-necrosis in all. UCLA hip function and activity score, SF-12 physical, and Harris Hip score were significantly (p<
0.05) better for SA versus HSR. However, 2 SA were revised to THR, and 5 had evidence of femoral loosening. There was no evidence of femoral loosenings in the hemiresurfacing group. The median femoral component size was significantly larger in HSR than SA. Although the functional results are inferior with HSR, patients are at greater risk of femoral loosening with the full surface arthroplasty. To determine if differences in outcome exist between HSR and MMSA at five years of follow-up in a group of patients with Ficat Stage III and IV osteonecrosis. Treatment of osteonecrosis of the hip in the young adult still remains a challenge. The continued use of conservative prosthetic solutions should help minimize the morbidity of revision hip surgery. Although the functional clinical outcome of MMSA is superior to HSR, patients are at greater risk of femoral loosening. Use of a larger femoral component in MMSA may decrease the risk of femoral loosening. Eighty-four hips with osteonecrosis were treated with a resurfacing implant: fifty-six with a metal-metal SA, mean age 40.4 and twenty-eight, mean age 37.2 with a hemiresurfacing when the acetabular cartilage was minimally damaged. Male/female ratio was 73%/27% for HSR and 87%/13% for MMSA. Mean follow-up of 4.5 years, UCLA hip scores were significantly (p<
0.05) better for MMSA versus HSR for function (9.3 vs. 7.9) and activity (6.8 vs. 5.5) but not for pain (9.3 vs.8.6) and walking (9.5 vs. 9.0). SF-12 scores were comparable for the mental component but significantly better in the MMSA group (48.4 vs. 38.1, p= 0.001) for the physical component. Harris Hip Score was significantly better for MMSA (92.3 vs. 83.3, p=0.001). 2 MMSA were revised to THR, and five presented with evidence of femoral loosening. There was no evidence of femoral loosenings in HSR. Median femoral component size was significantly larger for HSR (50.0 vs. 46.0, p= 0.001).
Legg-Calve-Perthes and slipped capital femoral epiphysis may result in alterations of the proximal femoral morphology, leading to the development of secondary hip osteoarthritis as a young adult. Hip surface arthroplasty presents special technical challenges in these patients because of the abnormal anatomy of the head and neck. We reviewed the radiographic and clinical results of patients with a history of either LCP or SCFE, who underwent hip resurfacing between 1996 and 2002. Twenty-three patients (25 hips, 14 with LCP and 11 with SCFE) underwent metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. The average age at the time of surgery was 38.1 years and 87% of the patients were male. The mean time to follow-up was 26.9 months. UCLA pain, walking, function, and activity scores improved significantly in both groups as well as the SF-12 physical component scores. One patient with LCP required bilateral conversion to THA at 55 months postoperatively secondary to femoral component loosening. There were no dislocations or femoral neck fractures in this series. Of 11 patients who presented leg length discrepancies preoperatively, limb length was postoperatively equalized in six patients, 3 were maintained with the same amount of discrepancy, and 2 decreased their discrepancy by at least 1 cm. In Charnley Class A patients, there was no difference in femoral offset between the operated and the disease-free, contralateral hip after reconstruction. Despite the challenges in performing hip resurfacing in this patient population, the results to date have been encouraging. Even with the limitations of resurfacing in restoring leg length and offset, the clinical results of this group of patients are comparable to those of the other etiologies.
The purpose of this study was to present our experience with femoral neck fractures that occurred after metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty and to assess their causation.
In addition, a review of the femoral neck fracture cases identified from the Conserve+ Multi-Center IDE was performed (19 femoral neck fractures in 1203 cases, 1.6%).
Multi-Center IDE: Additional risk factors were identified among which impingement of the neck with the acetabular component, notching of the lateral femoral neck cortex, and leaving the femoral component proud (not completely seated).
A recent study of tissues from 14 modern metal-on-metal (MM) total hips reported an intense diffuse and perivascular (p.v.) lymphocytic infiltrate, suggestive of hypersensitivity (Willert et al. Osteologie 2000; 9:2–16). This study evaluated the histopathology of tissues from modern MMs using cases obtained at revision or autopsy.
The short metaphyseal stem serves as a useful Ç barometer È for þxation and impending loosening.
To review short to medium term results of a metalon-metal (M/M) hybrid surface arthroplasty (SA) for a young and active patient population. The first 300 hips (of 564) in 263 patients underwent M/M hybrid surface arthroplasty (cementless acetabular and cemented femoral components). Demographics: mean age 48.4; 75% males, 25% females; 141 Charnley Class A; 109 Class B and 13 Class C. Diagnosis at surgery: OA 67%, DDH 10.3%, ON 8.3%, Post-traumatic 6.7%, Inflammatory arthritis and Rheumatoid Disease 4%, SCFE and LCP 3.4%, Melorheostosis 0.3%. Mean follow-up 3.6 years (2.5–5.9). Average UCLA hip scores post-op: pain 9.4, walking 9.5, function 9.4 and activity 7.7. Average Harris Hip Score was 92.8. The SF-12 physical and mental components were respectively, 31.4 and 47.2 pre-op and 49.9 and 52.9 post-op. DEXA data suggests preservation or restoration of neck BMD. The experience with SA of all cemented metal/ UHMWPE bearing demonstrated failure rates of 15%–33% at 3 years. At longer follow-up, the preliminary experience is encouraging (3.6% failure rate) and eventual conversions to THR are facilitated with unipolar heads. The technique preserves femoral and ace-tabular bone, dislocation is rare, and acetabular fixation secure. Initial femoral fixation is critical as the fixation area is small, especially with osteopenia and cystic degeneration. The percent of potentially adverse radiographic changes was much greater in the first 100 cases, during the time of development of instrumentation, technique, and bearing optimisation.
Cemented Ti-6Al-4V components were used to resurface ten femoral heads in nine young adult patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (average age 32 years; range 20 to 51). There were eight hips at Ficat stage III and two at stage IV. Five hips have maintained satisfactory function for an average period of 11.2 years (10 to 12.2) with no radiographic evidence of component loosening or osteolysis; five have been revised after an average period of 7.8 years (3.3 to 10.3) for pain caused by deterioration of the acetabular cartilage. No component required revision for loosening and the specimens retrieved at revision showed no evidence of osteolysis despite burnishing of the titanium bearing surface and the presence of particulate titanium debris in the tissues.
Polyethylene acetabular cups retrieved at revision surgery were measured by a shadowgraph technique to determine linear wear, and the values were compared with those obtained from radiographs. There was a close correlation between them, although the radiographic measurements slightly underestimated the true wear. Average linear wear rates for surface-replacement components were much greater than those for conventional prostheses with femoral heads up to 32 mm in diameter. Volumetric wear, calculated using a new formula, was found to be less than previously reported in vivo, and similar in magnitude to the results of experimental wear tests in vitro. The volumetric wear rates were greatest for the surface-replacement components and, for conventional components, were found to increase in a linear manner with component diameter.