Introduction. Previous reports have investigated the correlation between time to revision hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and reason for revision, but little is known regarding the impact of timing on outcomes following rTHA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of time to rTHA on both indication and outcomes of rTHA. Methods. This retrospective observational study reviewed patients who underwent unilateral, aseptic rTHA at an academic orthopedic specialty hospital between January 2016 and April 2019 with at least 1-year of follow-up. Patients were early revisions if they were revised within 2 years of primary THA (pTHA) or late revisions if revised after greater than 2 years. Patient demographics, surgical factors, and post-operative outcomes were compared between the groups. Post-hoc power analysis was performed (1-β=0.991). Results. 188 cases were identified, with 61 hips undergoing early revision and 127 undergoing late revision. There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities between the groups. Type of revision differed between the groups, with early revisions having a greater proportion of femoral revisions (54.1% vs.20.5%) and late revisions having a greater proportion of both component (10.2% vs.6.6%), acetabular (30.7% vs.26.2%), or head/liner (38.6% vs. 13.1%;p< 0.001) revisions. Indication for index revision differed between the groups, with early revisions having a greater proportion for dislocation/instability (21.3% vs. 10.2%) and peri-prosthetic fracture (42.6% vs.9.4%), and late revisions having a greater proportion for loosening/osteolysis (40.9% vs.24.6%), metal-on-metal complications (11.0% vs.0.0%), and liner wear (18.9% vs.0.0%;p< 0.001). Early revisions experienced longer length of stay (LOS; 5.18±4.43 vs.3.43±2.76 days;p=0.005) and more often underwent reoperation (8.2% vs 1.6%;p=0.037). Conclusions. Early aseptic revisions had worse outcomes with longer LOS and higher rates of reoperation. These differences may be attributable to the type and indication for revision. Arthroplasty surgeons should be aware of these differences when counseling patients after THA

Aims

Custom-made partial pelvis replacements (PPRs) are increasingly used in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects and have mainly been designed using a triflange approach, requiring extensive soft-tissue dissection. The monoflange design, where primary intramedullary fixation within the ilium combined with a monoflange for rotational stability, was anticipated to overcome this obstacle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the design with regard to functional outcome, complications, and acetabular reconstruction.

Aims. This study compares the re-revision rate and mortality following septic and aseptic revision hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in registry data, and compares the outcomes to previously reported data. Methods. This is an observational cohort study using data from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD). A total of 17,842 rTHAs were included, and the rates and cumulative incidence of hip re-revision and mortality following septic and aseptic rTHA were analyzed with seven-year follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine the re-revision rate and cumulative probability of mortality following rTHA. Results. The re-revision rate within one year after septic rTHA was 30%, and after seven years was 34%. The cumulative mortality within the first year after septic rTHA was 14%, and within seven years was 40%. After multiple previous hip revisions, the re-revision rate rose to over 40% in septic rTHA. The first six months were identified as the most critical period for the re-revision for septic rTHA. Conclusion. The risk re-revision and reinfection after septic rTHA was almost four times higher, as recorded in the ERPD, when compared to previous meta-analysis. We conclude that it is currently not possible to assume the data from single studies and meta-analysis reflects the outcomes in the ‘real world’. Data presented in meta-analyses and from specialist single-centre studies do not reflect the generality of outcomes as recorded in the ERPD. The highest re-revision rates and mortality are seen in the first six months postoperatively. The optimization of perioperative care through the development of a network of high-volume specialist hospitals is likely to lead to improved outcomes for patients undergoing rTHA, especially if associated with infection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):565–572

Aims. Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) are complex procedures with higher rates of re-revision, complications, and mortality compared to primary TKA and THA. We report the effects of the establishment of a revision arthroplasty network (the East Midlands Specialist Orthopaedic Network; EMSON) on outcomes of rTKA and rTHA. Methods. The revision arthroplasty network was established in January 2015 and covered five hospitals in the Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire areas of the East Midlands of England. This comprises a collaborative weekly multidisciplinary meeting where upcoming rTKA and rTHA procedures are discussed, and a plan agreed. Using the Hospital Episode Statistics database, revision procedures carried out between April 2011 and March 2018 (allowing two-year follow-up) from the five network hospitals were compared to all other hospitals in England. Age, sex, and mean Hospital Frailty Risk scores were used as covariates. The primary outcome was re-revision surgery within one year of the index revision. Secondary outcomes were re-revision surgery within two years, any complication within one and two years, and median length of hospital stay. Results. A total of 57,621 rTHA and 33,828 rTKA procedures were performed across England, of which 1,485 (2.6%) and 1,028 (3.0%), respectively, were conducted within the network. Re-revision rates within one year for rTHA were 7.3% and 6.0%, and for rTKA were 11.6% and 7.4% pre- and postintervention, respectively, within the network. This compares to a pre-to-post change from 7.4% to 6.8% for rTHA and from 11.7% to 9.7% for rTKA for the rest of England. In comparative interrupted time-series analysis for rTKA there was a significant immediate improvement in one-year re-revision rates for the revision network compared to the rest of England (p = 0.024), but no significant change for rTHA (p = 0.504). For the secondary outcomes studied, there was a significant improvement in trend for one- and two-year complication rates for rTHA for the revision network compared to the rest of England. Conclusion. Re-revision rates for rTKA and complication rates for rTHA improved significantly at one and two years with the introduction of a revision arthroplasty network, when compared to the rest of England. Most of the outcomes studied improved to a greater extent in the network hospitals compared to the rest of England when comparing the pre- and postintervention periods. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):641–648

Aims. Custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) play an important role in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, particularly in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and pelvic tumour resection procedures. Accurate CTAC positioning is essential to successful surgical outcomes. While prior studies have explored CTAC positioning in rTHA, research focusing on tumour cases and implant flange positioning precision remains limited. Additionally, the impact of intraoperative navigation on positioning accuracy warrants further investigation. This study assesses CTAC positioning accuracy in tumour resection and rTHA cases, focusing on the differences between preoperative planning and postoperative implant positions. Methods. A multicentre observational cohort study in Australia between February 2017 and March 2021 included consecutive patients undergoing acetabular reconstruction with CTACs in rTHA (Paprosky 3A/3B defects) or tumour resection (including Enneking P2 peri-acetabular area). Of 103 eligible patients (104 hips), 34 patients (35 hips) were analyzed. Results. CTAC positioning was generally accurate, with minor deviations in cup inclination (mean 2.7°; SD 2.84°), anteversion (mean 3.6°; SD 5.04°), and rotation (mean 2.1°; SD 2.47°). Deviation of the hip centre of rotation (COR) showed a mean vector length of 5.9 mm (SD 7.24). Flange positions showed small deviations, with the ischial flange exhibiting the largest deviation (mean vector length of 7.0 mm; SD 8.65). Overall, 83% of the implants were accurately positioned, with 17% exceeding malpositioning thresholds. CTACs used in tumour resections exhibited higher positioning accuracy than rTHA cases, with significant differences in inclination (1.5° for tumour vs 3.4° for rTHA) and rotation (1.3° for tumour vs 2.4° for rTHA). The use of intraoperative navigation appeared to enhance positioning accuracy, but this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion. This study demonstrates favourable CTAC positioning accuracy, with potential for improved accuracy through intraoperative navigation. Further research is needed to understand the implications of positioning accuracy on implant performance and long-term survival. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):260–268

Aims. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the learning curve of semi-active robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), and to compare the accuracy, patient-reported functional outcomes, complications, and survivorship between rTHA and manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA). Methods. Searches of PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar were performed in April 2020 in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included “robotic”, “hip”, and “arthroplasty”. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical research articles reporting the learning curve for rTHA (robotic arm-assisted only) and those comparing the implantation accuracy, functional outcomes, survivorship, or complications with mTHA. Results. There were 501 articles initially identified from databases and references. Following full text screening, 17 articles that satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. Four studies reported the learning curve of rTHA, 13 studies reported on implant positioning, five on functional outcomes, ten on complications, and four on survivorship. The meta-analysis showed a significantly greater number of cases of acetabular component placement in the safe zone compared with the mTHA group (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.10 to 7.94; p < 0.001) and that rTHA resulted in a significantly better Harris Hip Score compared to mTHA in the short- to mid-term follow-up (95% CI 0.46 to 5.64; p = 0.020). However, there was no difference in infection rates, dislocation rates, overall complication rates, and survival rates at short-term follow-up. Conclusion. The learning curve of rTHA was between 12 and 35 cases, which was dependent on the assessment goal, such as operating time, accuracy, and team working. Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty was associated with improved accuracy of component positioning and functional outcome, however no difference in complication rates or survival were observed at short- to mid-term follow-up. Overall, there remains an absence of high-quality level I evidence and cost analysis comparing rTHA and mTHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1009–1020

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to compare the hip-specific functional outcome of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) with manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Secondary aims were to compare general health improvement, patient satisfaction, and radiological component position and restoration of leg length between rTHA and mTHA. Methods. A total of 40 patients undergoing rTHA were propensity score matched to 80 patients undergoing mTHA for OA. Patients were matched for age, sex, and preoperative function. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were collected pre- and postoperatively (mean 10 months (SD 2.2) in rTHA group and 12 months (SD 0.3) in mTHA group). In addition, patient satisfaction was collected postoperatively. Component accuracy was assessed using Lewinnek and Callanan safe zones, and restoration of leg length were assessed radiologically. Results. There were no significant differences in the preoperative demographics (p ≥ 0.781) or function (p ≥ 0.383) between the groups. The postoperative OHS (difference 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 4.8; p = 0.038) and FJS (difference 21.1, 95% CI 10.7 to 31.5; p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the rTHA group when compared with the mTHA group. However, only the FJS was clinically significantly greater. There was no difference in the postoperative EQ-5D (difference 0.017, 95% CI -0.042 to 0.077; p = 0.562) between the two groups. No patients were dissatisfied in the rTHA group whereas six were dissatisfied in the mTHA group, but this was not significant (p = 0.176). rTHA was associated with an overall greater rate of component positioning in a safe zone (p ≤ 0.003) and restoration of leg length (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients undergoing rTHA had a greater hip-specific functional outcome when compared to mTHA, which may be related to improved component positioning and restoration of leg length. However, there was no difference in their postoperative generic health or rate of satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(1):22–30

Aims. The burden of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) continues to grow. The surgery is complex and associated with significant costs. Regional rTHA networks have been proposed to improve outcomes and to reduce re-revisions, and therefore costs. The aim of this study was to accurately quantify the cost and reimbursement for a rTHA service, and to assess the financial impact of case complexity at a tertiary referral centre within the NHS. Methods. A retrospective analysis of all revision hip procedures was performed at this centre over two consecutive financial years (2018 to 2020). Cases were classified according to the Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) and whether they were infected or non-infected. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≥ III or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. are considered “high risk” by the RHCC. Costs were calculated using the Patient Level Information and Costing System (PLICS), and remuneration based on Healthcare Resource Groups (HRG) data. The primary outcome was the financial difference between tariff and cost per patient episode. Results. In all, 199 revision episodes were identified in 168 patients: 25 (13%) least complex revisions (H1); 110 (55%) complex revisions (H2); and 64 (32%) most complex revisions (H3). Of the 199, 76 cases (38%) were due to infection, and 78 patients (39%) were “high risk”. Median length of stay increased significantly with case complexity from four days to six to eight days (p = 0.006) and for revisions performed for infection (9 days vs 5 days; p < 0.001). Cost per episode increased significantly between complexity groups (p < 0.001) and for infected revisions (p < 0.001). All groups demonstrated a mean deficit but this significantly increased with revision complexity (£97, £1,050, and £2,887 per case; p = 0.006) and for infected failure (£2,629 vs £635; p = 0.032). The total deficit to the NHS Trust over two years was £512,202. Conclusion. Current NHS reimbursement for rTHA is inadequate and should be more closely aligned to complexity. An increase in the most complex rTHAs at major revision centres will likely place a greater financial burden on these units. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):559–566

Aims. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between reason for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and outcomes in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods. We reviewed a prospective cohort of 647 patients undergoing full or partial rTHA at a single high-volume centre with a minimum of two years’ follow-up. The reasons for revision were classified as: infection; aseptic loosening; dislocation; structural failure; and painful THA for other reasons. PROMs (modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) score, and visual analogue scales for pain during rest and activity), complication rates, and failure rates were compared among the groups. Results. The indication for revision influenced PROMs improvement over time. This finding mainly reflected preoperative differences between the groups, but diminished between the first and second postoperative years. Preoperatively, patients revised due to infection and aseptic loosening had a lower mOHS than patients with other indications for revision. Pain scores at baseline were highest in patients being revised for dislocation. Infection and aseptic loosening groups showed marked changes over time in both mOHS and EQ-5D-3L. Overall complications and re-revision rates were 35.4% and 9.7% respectively, with no differences between the groups (p = 0.351 and p = 0.470, respectively). Conclusion. Good outcomes were generally obtained regardless of the reason for revision, with patients having the poorest preoperative scores exhibiting the greatest improvement in PROMs. Furthermore, overall complication and reoperation rates were in line with previous reports and did not differ between different indications for rTHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):859–866

The aim of this study was to measure the effect of hospital case volume on the survival of revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). This is a retrospective analysis of Scottish Arthroplasty Project data, a nationwide audit which prospectively collects data on all arthroplasty procedures performed in Scotland. The primary outcome was RTHA survival at ten years. The primary explanatory variable was the effect of hospital case volume per year on RTHA survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the lifespan of RTHA. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used to estimate relative revision risks over time. Hazard ratios (HRs) were reported with 95% CI, and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. From 1999 to 2019, 13,020 patients underwent RTHA surgery in Scotland (median age at RTHA 70 years (interquartile range (IQR) 62 to 77)). In all, 5,721 (43.9%) were female, and 1065 (8.2%) were treated for infection. 714 (5.5%) underwent a second revision procedure. Co-morbidity, younger age at index revision, and positive infection status were associated with need for re-revision (p<0.001). The ten-year survival estimate for RTHA was 93.3% (95% CI 92.8 to 93.8). Adjusting for sex, age, surgeon volume, and indication for revision, high hospital case volume was not significantly associated with lower risk of re-revision (HR1, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.00, p 0.073)). The majority of RTHA in Scotland survive up to ten years. Increasing yearly hospital case volume cases is not independently associated with a significant risk reduction of re-revision

Aims. The aim of this study was to examine the implant accuracy of custom-made partial pelvis replacements (PPRs) in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Custom-made implants offer an option to achieve a reconstruction in cases with severe acetabular bone loss. By analyzing implant deviation in CT and radiograph imaging and correlating early clinical complications, we aimed to optimize the usage of custom-made implants. Methods. A consecutive series of 45 (2014 to 2019) PPRs for Paprosky III defects at rTHA were analyzed comparing the preoperative planning CT scans used to manufacture the implants with postoperative CT scans and radiographs. The anteversion (AV), inclination (IC), deviation from the preoperatively planned implant position, and deviation of the centre of rotation (COR) were explored. Early postoperative complications were recorded, and factors for malpositioning were sought. The mean follow-up was 30 months (SD 19; 6 to 74), with four patients lost to follow-up. Results. Mean CT defined discrepancy (Δ) between planned and achieved AV and IC was 4.5° (SD 3°; 0° to 12°) and 4° (SD 3.5°; 1° to 12°), respectively. Malpositioning (Δ > 10°) occurred in five hips (10.6%). Native COR reconstruction was planned in 42 cases (93%), and the mean 3D deviation vector was 15.5 mm (SD 8.5; 4 to 35). There was no significant influence in malpositioning found for femoral stem retention, surgical approach, or fixation method. Conclusion. At short-term follow-up, we found that PPR offers a viable solution for rTHA in cases with massive acetabular bone loss, as highly accurate positioning can be accomplished with meticulous planning, achieving anatomical reconstruction. Accuracy of achieved placement contributed to reduced complications with no injury to vital structures by screw fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1110–1117

Instability and aseptic loosening are the two main complications after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Dual-mobility (DM) cups were shown to counteract implant instability during rTHA. To our knowledge, no study evaluated the 10-year outcomes of rTHA using DM cups, cemented into a metal reinforcement ring, in cases of severe acetabular bone loss. We hypothesized that using a DM cup cemented into a metal ring is a reliable technique for rTHA at 10 years, with few revisions for acetabular loosening and/or instability. This is a retrospective study of 77 rTHA cases with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky ≥ 2C) treated exclusively with a DM cup (NOVAE STICK; SERF, DÉCINES-CHARPIEU, FRANCE) cemented into a cage (Kerboull cross, Burch-Schneider, or ARM rings). Clinical scores and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The main endpoints were revision surgery for aseptic loosening or recurring dislocation. With a mean follow-up of 10.7 years [2.1-16.2], 3 patients were reoperated because of aseptic acetabular loosening (3.9%) at 9.6 years [7-12]. Seven patients (9.45%) dislocated their hip implant, only 1 suffered from chronic instability (1.3%). Cup survivorship was 96.1% at 10 years. No sign of progressive radiolucent lines were found and bone graft integration was satisfactory for 91% of the patients. The use of a DM cup cemented into a metal ring during rTHA with complex acetabular bone loss was associated with low revision rates for either acetabular loosening or chronic instability at 10 years. That's why we also recommend DM cup for all high risk of dislocation situations

Studies and meta-analyses worldwide show an increased use of one-stage revisions for treating periprosthetic hip infections, often yielding comparable or better outcomes than two-stage revisions. However, it remains unclear if these successful results can be consistently achieved nationwide besides large centers. This observational cohort study used data from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) to compare the mortality and re-revision rates between one-stage (n=8183) and two-stage (n=657) first-time revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). Kaplan-Meier estimates were applied to evaluate the re-revision rate and cumulative mortality for RTHA. There was a significant difference in mortality between one-stage and two-stage RTHA (p=0.02). One-year post-surgery, the mortality rate was 9.4% for one-stage revisions and 5.5% for two-stage revisions. At the five-year follow-up, the mortality rate for one-stage revisions was 25.5%, compared to 20.0% for two-stage revisions. No significant differences (p=0.30) were found in re-revision rates between one-stage and two-stage revisions after one year (one-stage 16.5% vs. two-stage 13.5%) or five years (one-stage 21.6% vs. two-stage 20.8%). For multiple revisions, the mortality differences were even larger (p<0.001), with a one-year mortality rate of 12.8% for one-stage RTHA and 5.7% for two-stage RTHA. Despite the excellent results of one-stage RTHA in the literature from individual large centers, it shows a significantly higher mortality rate with equal re-revision rate compared to two-stage revision in the nationwide care besides large centers. Significant differences can already be seen within the first year, indicating an increased perioperative mortality for one-stage revision, which might be explained by longer surgery duration, blood-loss and patient selection or maybe a lack of experience concerning proper surgical debridement for one-stage revision. This illustrates the need to establish centers for joint-revision surgery that provide interdisciplinary care and high case numbers to improve perioperative outcomes

Reported incidence of blood transfusion following primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (pTHA, rTHA) has decreased considerably compared to historical rates. However, it is not known if further adoption of techniques to limit transfusions has resulted in further reduction on a large scale. The purpose of this study was to assess recent trends in blood transfusions and contemporary risk factors for transfusions using a large, national database. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients undergoing pTHA and rTHA between 2011 to 2019. pTHA for fracture, infection, tumor, and bilateral procedures were excluded. Only aseptic rTHA were included. Annual incidence of transfusions and proportion of patients with optimized preoperative hematocrit (HCT) (defined as ≥33%) were assessed. Risk factors for transfusion were evaluated with 2018 and 2019 data using multivariate analyses. 234,352 pTHA and 16,322 rTHA were included. Transfusion following pTHA decreased from 21.4% in 2011 to 2.5% in 2019 and from 33.5% in 2011 to 12.0% in 2019 for rTHA (p<0.0001). Patients with optimized HCT increased for pTHA (96.7% in 2011 vs 98.1% in 2019, p<0.0001) and did not change for rTHA (91.5% in 2011 vs 91.6% in 2019, p=0.27). Decreased HCT was most strongly associated with transfusions, with each three-point change corresponding to odds ratio of 1.90 and 1.78 for pTHA and rTHA, respectively. Increased age, female sex, history of bleeding disorders or preoperative transfusion, ASA score ≥3, non-spinal anesthesia, and longer operative times were also associated with increased odds for transfusion. Incidence of blood transfusion has continued to decrease following pTHA and rTHA. Despite care improvements, transfusions still occur in certain high-risk patients. While transfusion in pTHA may have reached the lower asymptote, further reduction in rTHA may be possible through further improvements in preoperative optimization and surgical technique

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence the microbiological spectrum and clinical outcome of hip and knee revision arthroplasties with unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) at a single center with minimum follow up of 2 years. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry. Between 2011 and 2020 we performed presumably aseptic rTHA (n=939) and rTKA (n= 1,058). Clinical outcome, re-revision rates and causes as well as the microbiological spectrum were evaluated. Results. In total, 219/939 (23.3%) rTHA and 114/ 1,058 (10.8%) rTKA had a UPIC (p<0.001). Single positive intraoperative cultures were found in 173/219 (78.9%) in rTHA and 99/114 (86.8%) in rTKA, whereas 46/219 (21.0%) rTHA and 15/114 (13.2%) rTKA had positive results in ≥2 intraoperative cultures. A total of 390 microorganisms were found among the 333 cases. Staphylococcus epidermidis 30.9%, CoNS (21.9%), Cutibacterium acnes 21.1%, and Bacillus spp. 7.3% were the most common microorganisms. Overall, detected microorganisms showed high sensitivity to daptomycin (96.6%), vancomycin (97.3%) and linezolid (98.0%). After a minimum follow up of 2 years (rTHA 1,470 (735; 3,738) days; rTKA 1,474 (749; 4,055) days). During the 2-year follow-up, 8 patients died and 5 were lost to follow-up. There were 54/219 (24.7%) re-revision in rTHa and 20/114 (17.5%) in rTKA. Overall, there were 23 (10.5%) septic re-rTHA and 9 (7.9%) septic re-rTKA as well as 31 (14.2%) aseptic re-rTHA and 11 (9.6%) aseptic re-rTKA. Patients with previous septic revisions bevor UPIC procedure showed a significant higher risk for septic re-revision (p<0.05). Moreover, there were less septic re-revisions after single culture positive UPIC (rTHA: 16/173 (9.2%); rTKA 6/99 (6.1%)) compared to ≥2 positive intraoperative cultures UPIC (rTHA: 7/46 (15.2%); rTKA 3/15 (20.0%)). The most common reason for re-revision in the rTHA-group was aseptic loosening of the cup (34.2%) or of the stem (23.3%), dislocation (18.3%) and periprosthetic-fractures (7.8%). In the rTKA-group it was aseptic loosening (40.4%), instability (24.6%) and secondary patella resurfacing (7.9%). There was a higher septic re-revision rate in consecutive revisions than in planned revisions 17.3% vs. 8.5% in the rTHA-group and 14.3% vs. 7.5% in the rTKA-group, p<0.001. Conclusion. UPICs are common in rTJA. The rate was higher in hips which may partly explained by the easier pre op joint aspiration in the knee. UPIC may lead to an increase in subsequent re-revisions

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) can be complex and associated with significant cost, with an increasing burden within the UK and globally. Regional rTHA networks have been proposed aiming to improve outcomes, reduce re-revisions and therefore costs. The aim of this study was to accurately quantify the cost and reimbursement for the rTHA service and to assess the financial impact of case complexity at a tertiary referral centre within the NHS. A retrospective analysis of all revision hip procedures was performed over two consecutive financial years (2018–2020). Cases were classified according to the Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) and by mode of failure; infected or non-infected. Patients of ASA grade of 3 or greater or BMI over 40 are considered “high-risk” by the RHCC. Costs were calculated using PLICS and remuneration based on the HRG data. The primary outcome was the financial difference between tariff and cost per episode per patient. Comparisons between groups were analysed using analysis of variance and two-tailed unpaired t-test. 199 revision episodes were identified in 168 patients: 25 (13%) least complex revisions (H1), 110 (55%) complex revisions (H2) and 64 (32%) most complex revisions (H3). 76 (38%) cases were due to infection. 78 (39%) of patients were in the “high-risk” group. Median length of stay increased with case complexity from 4, to 6 to 8 days (p=0.17) and significantly for revisions performed for infection (9 vs 5 days; p=0.01). Cost per episode increased significantly between complexity groups (p=0.0002) and for infected revisions (p=0.003). All groups demonstrated a mean deficit, but this significantly increased with revision complexity (£301, £1,820 and £4,757 per case; p=0.02) and for infected failure (£4,023 vs £1,679; p=0.02). The total deficit to the trust for the two-years was £512,202. Current NHS reimbursement for rTHA is inadequate and should be more closely aligned to complexity. An increase in the most complex rTHA at major revision centres (MRC) will likely place a greater financial burden on these units

Aim of this study was to identify reoperation rates in patients with short oblique and transverse fractures around a well fixed cemented polished taper slip stem and to determine any associations with treatment failure. Retrospective cohort study of 31 patients with AO transverse or short oblique Vancouver B1 PFFs around THA (total hip arthroplasty) cemented taper slip stems: 12 male (39%); mean age 74±11.9 (range 44–91); mean BMI 28.5±1.4 (range 16–48); and median ASA 3. Patient journeys were assessed, re-interventions reviewed. The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Time from primary THA to fracture was 11.3±7.8yrs (0.5–26yrs). Primary surgical management was fixation in 27/31 and rTHA (revision total hip arthroplasty) in 4/31. 10 of 31 (32%) patients required reoperation, 9 within 2 years of fracture: 1 following rTHA and 8 following ORIF. The commonest mode of failure was non-union (n=6). No significant associations with reoperation requirement were identified. Kaplan-Meier free from reoperation was 67.4% (49.8–85.0 95% CI) at 2 years and this was unaffected by initial management with ORIF or rTHA (Log rank 0.898). Of those reoperated, 6/10 required multiple reoperations to obtain either bony union or a stable revision construct and 13% ultimately required proximal femoral endoprostheses. The relative risk of 1 year mortality was 1.6 (0.25 to 10.1 95%CI) among patients who required reoperation compared to those who did not. These are difficult fractures to manage, should not be underestimated and patients should be counselled that there is a 30% risk of reoperation and 20% of requiring multiple reoperations

Aims. Advances in surgical technique and implant design may influence the incidence and mechanism of failure resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of the current study was to characterize aetiologies requiring rTHA, and to determine whether temporal changes existed in these aetiologies over a ten-year period. Methods. All rTHAs performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were identified. Demographic information and mode of implant failure was obtained for all patients. Data for rTHA were stratified into two time periods to assess for temporal changes: 2009 to 2013, and 2014 to 2019. Operative reports, radiological imaging, and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were cross-checked to ensure the accurate classification of revision aetiology for each patient. Results. In all, 2,924 patients with a mean age of 64.6 years (17 to 96) were identified. There were 1,563 (53.5%) female patients, and the majority of patients were Caucasian (n = 2,362, 80.8%). The three most frequent rTHA aetiologies were infection (27.2%), aseptic loosening (25.2%), and wear (15.2%). The frequency of rTHA for adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) was significantly greater from 2014 to 2019 (4.7% vs 10.0%; p < 0.001), while the frequency of aseptic loosening was significantly greater from 2009 to 2013 (28.6% vs 21.9%; p < 0.001). Conclusion. Periprosthetic joint infection was the most common cause for rTHA in the current cohort of patients. Complications associated with ALTR necessitating rTHA was more frequent between 2014 to 2019, while aseptic loosening necessitating rTHA was significantly more frequent between 2009 to 2013. Optimizing protocols for prevention and management of infection and ALTR after THA may help to avoid additional financial burden to institutions and healthcare systems. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;2(1):16–21

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in the presence of femoral defects can be technically challenging. Reconstruction with long stems is widely accepted as the standard. However long stems can be difficult to insert and can compromise distal bone stock for future revisions. The aims of this study were to identify whether there was a difference in survival and outcomes following rTHA using a long versus standard or short femoral stem. A comprehensive systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria were (i) adult patients >18 years; (ii) randomised controlled trials, joint registry, or cohort studies; (iii) single or staged rTHA for Paprosky 1–3B femoral defects. Exclusion criteria were (i) mixed reporting without subgroup analysis for revision stem length; (ii) ex-vivo studies. Screening for eligibility and assessment of studies was performed by the authors. Out of 341 records, 9 studies met criteria for analysis (including 1 study utilising joint registry data and 1 randomised controlled trial). Across studies there were 3102 rTHAs performed in 2982 patients with a mean age of 67.4 years and a male: female ratio of 0.93. Revision prostheses were long-stemmed in 1727 cases and short or standard in 1375 cases with a mean follow up of 5 years (range, 0-15 years). On subgroup analysis the use of a long cemented stem compared to a long cementless prosthesis was associated with fewer complications and periprosthetic fracture in older patients. Survivorship was 95% with short stems compared to 84% with long stems at 5 years. Moderate quality evidence suggests that in rTHA with Paprosky type 1-3B femoral defects, the use of a short or standard stem can achieve comparable outcomes to long stems with fewer significant complications and revisions. Using a shorter stem may yield a more straightforward surgical technique and can preserve distal bone stock for future revision

Sound management decisions are critical to outcomes in revision arthroplasty. Aiming to improve outcomes, revision networks facilitate speciality trained, high volume surgeons, share experience and best practice, contributing to decision making within and away from their base hospital. We have reported the early clinical experience of East Midlands Specialist Orthopaedic Network (EMSON). In this paper we report beneficial clinical effects, both demonstrable and unquantifiable supporting the process. Using the UK HES database of revisions, performed before and after EMSON was established, (April 2011 – March 2018), data from EMSON hospitals were compared to all other hospitals in the same time-period. Primary outcome was re-revision surgery within 1 year. Secondary outcomes were re-revision, complications within first two years and median LOS. 57,621 RTHA and 33,828 RTKA procedures were involved with around 1,485 (2.6%) and 1,028 (3.0%) respectively performed within EMSON. Re-revision THA rates, within 1 year, in EMSON were 7.3% and 6.0% with re-revision knee rates 11.6% and 7.4%, pre- and post-intervention. Re-revision rates in the rest England in the same periods were 7.4% to 6.8% for hips and 11.7% to 9.7% for knees. This constituted a significant improvement in 1-year re-revision rates for EMSON knees. (β = −0.072 (−0.133 to −0.01), p = 0.024). The reduction in hip re-revision did not reach statistical significance. Secondary outcomes showed a significant improvement for 1 and 2-year RTHA complication rates. Re-revision rates for RTKA and complication rates for RTHA improved significantly after the introduction of EMSON. Other outcomes studied also improved to a greater extent in the network hospitals. While anecdotal experience with networks is positive, the challenge in collating data to prove clinic benefit should not be underestimated. Beyond the formal process, additional communication, interaction, and support has immeasurable benefit in both elective and emergency scenarios

There remains concern with the use of constrained liners (CL) implanted at the time of acetabular cup revision in revision total hip replacement (rTHA). The aim of this study was to determine the implant survival in rTHA when a CL was implanted at the same time as acetabular cup revision. We reviewed our institutional database to identify all consecutive rTHAs where a CL was implanted simultaneously at the time acetabular cup revision from 2001 to 2021. One-hundred and seventy-four revisions (173 patients) were included in the study. Mean follow-up of 8.7 years (range two – 21.7). The most common indications for rTHA were instability (35%), second-stage periprosthetic joint infection (26.4%), and aseptic loosening (17.2%). Kaplan Meier Analysis was used to determine survival with all-cause re-revision and revision for cup aseptic loosening (fixation failure) as the endpoints. A total of 32 (18.3%) patients underwent re-revision at a mean time of 2.9 years (range 0.1 – 14.1). The most common reasons for re-revision were instability (14), periprosthetic joint infection (seven), and loosening of the femoral component (four). Three (1.7%) required re-revision due to aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (fixation failure) at a mean of two years (0.1 – 5.1). Acetabular component survival free from re-revision due to aseptic loosening was 98.9% (95% CI 97.3 – 100) at five-years and 98.1% (95% CI 95.8 – 100) at 10-years. There were no acetabular component fixation failures in modern highly porous shells. CLs implanted at the time acetabular cup revision in rTHA have a 98.1% 10-year survival free from acetabular cup aseptic loosening (fixation failure). There were no cup fixation failures in modern highly porous shells. Thus, when necessary, implanting a CL during revision of an acetabular component with stable screw fixation is safe with an extremely low risk of cup fixation failure

Aims. Histology is an established tool in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Different thresholds, using various infection definitions and histopathological criteria, have been described. This study determined the performance of different thresholds of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (≥ 5 PMN/HPF, ≥ 10 PMN/HPF, ≥ 23 PMN/10 HPF) , when using the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria for PJI. Methods. A total of 119 patients undergoing revision total hip (rTHA) or knee arthroplasty (rTKA) were included. Permanent histology sections of periprosthetic tissue were evaluated under high power (400× magnification) and neutrophils were counted per HPF. The mean neutrophil count in ten HPFs was calculated (PMN/HPF). Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the z-test, thresholds were compared. Results. Using the EBJIS criteria, a cut-off of ≥ five PMN/HPF showed a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81 to 98) and specificity of 84% (95% CI 74 to 91). The optimal threshold when applying the IDSA and ICM criteria was ≥ ten PMN/HPF with sensitivities of 94% (95% CI 79 to 99) and 90% (95% CI 76 to 97), and specificities of 86% (95% CI 77 to 92) and 92% (95% CI 84 to 97), respectively. In rTKA, a better performance of histopathological analysis was observed in comparison with rTHA when using the IDSA criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusion. With high accuracy, histopathological analysis can be supported as a confirmatory criterion in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections. A threshold of ≥ five PMN/HPF can be recommended to distinguish between septic and aseptic loosening, with an increased possibility of detecting more infections caused by low-virulence organisms. However, neutrophil counts between one and five should be considered suggestive of infection and interpreted carefully in conjunction with other diagnostic test methods. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(8):536–547

The aim of this study is to examine the differences in long-term mortality rates between infected and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in a single specialist centre over an 18-year period. Retrospective consecutive study of all patients who underwent rTHA at our tertiary centre between 2003 and 2020 was carried out. Revisions were classified as infected or aseptic. We identified patients’ age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade (ASA) and body mass index (BMI). The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 5 years, 10 years and over the whole study period at 18 years. Death was identified through both local hospital electronic databases and linked data for the National Joint Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to death. Where two-stage revision techniques were used of the management of infected cases, these were grouped as a single revision episode for the purpose of analysis. In total, 1138 consecutive hip revisions were performed on 1063 patients (56 bilateral revisions – aseptic, 10 Excision arthroplasties – infection, 9 – Debridement, Antibiotics, Implant retention (DAIR) with 893 aseptic revisions in 837 patients (78.7%) and 245 infected revisions in 226 patients (21.3%). Average age of the entire study cohort was 71.0 (24–101) with 527 female (49.6%). Average age of the infection and aseptic cohorts was 68.8 and 71.5 respectively. Revisions for infection had higher mortality rates throughout the three time points of analysis. Patients’ survivorship for infected vs aseptic revisions was; 77.8% vs 87.7% at 5 years, 62.8% vs 76.5% at 10 years and 62.4% vs 72.0% at 18 years. The unadjusted 10-year risk ratio of death after infected revision was 1.58 (95% confidence interval 1.28–1.95) compared to aseptic revisions. rTHA performed for infection is associated with significantly higher long-term mortality at all time points compared to aseptic revision surgery

Component malposition in total hip arthroplasty (THA) contributes to wear, dislocation, and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) utilises computer-assisted haptically guided bone preparation and implant insertion to improve accuracy. The goal of this study is to compare accuracy and clinical outcome with manual THA (mTHA) and rTHA at minimum 1 year follow-up interval. Consecutive primary THA performed by one fellowship trained surgeon included: the first 100 mTHAs in his clinical practice (Group1- year 2000), the last 100 mTHAs before rTHA use (Group2- year 2010), and the first 100 rTHA (Group3- year 2011). All THAs utilised cementless implants, cross-linked polyethylene, and a posterior approach. Comparisons included age, sex, diagnosis, implant head size, blood loss (EBL), operative time, LLD, early dislocation and infection. Acetabular abduction (AAB), anteversion (AAV), and LLD were measured using validated software (Martell Hip Analysis Suite). The Lewinnek safe zone defined accuracy (AAB- 30°-50°, AAV- 5°-25°). Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Chi squared, and Fisher tests. Power analysis demonstrated adequate sample sizes. No differences were noted regarding group demographics. Average operative times varied: Group 1, 2, and 3- (160, 129, and 143 minutes, respectively). No deep infections occurred in any group. LLD greater than 1.5 cm varied: Groups 1, 2, and 3 (9%, 1%, 1%, respectively). Dislocation rates varied: Groups 1, 2, and 3- (5%, 3%, and 0%, respectively). EBL was less with rTHA than mTHA (Groups 1, 2, 3: 533cc, 437cc, 357cc, respectively). Average implant head size increased comparing Groups 1, 2, and 3 (31mm, 34.6mm, and 35.2mm, respectively). AAB accuracy varied: Groups 1, 2, and 3 (66%, 91%, and 98%, respectively). AAB greater than 55 degrees varied: Groups 1, 2, and 3 (15%, 1%, and 0%, respectively). There was a 3% fractured acetabular liner rate in Group 1, all cases occurred with AAB > 55 degrees, and AAB greater than 55 degrees correlated with increased acetabular liner fracture rate (20% vs. 0%, P < 0.05). No cases of fractured acetabular liners occurred in Group 2 or 3. rTHA improved AAV accuracy compared with mTHA (Group 2- 48%, Group 3- 75%; p<0.0001). Improved acetabular component accuracy with rTHA correlated with lower dislocation rates compared with mTHA (p<0.001). Total hip arthroplasty performed with traditional manual techniques has demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes in the majority of patients with many THA designs if components are placed accurately. Limitations in mTHA remain that alter results if accurate component placement is not achieved. In our study, clinical experience over 10 years improved AAB accuracy with mTHA, but AAV remained problematic. rTHA improved AAB and AAV accuracy compared with mTHA and demonstrated reduced early dislocation rates, improved rate of LLD, and reduced acetabular liner fracture risk compared with mTHA (p<0.05). Average rTHA operative times were 14 minutes longer than mTHA (Group 2), but this was not associated with increased EBL or infection rates. Further study is needed to evaluate whether the short term clinical and radiographic advantages noted with rTHA compared with mTHA will be maintained at longer follow up intervals

Purpose of the study: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is associated with higher mortality than primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA). The functional outcome after rTHA is globally satisfactory but less so than with primary implantation. Nevertheless, data are scarce. Patients undergoing revision procedures are older and have more co-morbid conditions. In this context, we evaluated quality-of-life and patient satisfaction five years after implantation, comparing rTHA versus pTHA. We analyzed the impact of age, obesity, and co-morbid conditions. Material and methods: The study cohort included all patients undergoing pTHA (n=471) OR rTHA (n=124) in our unit between 1996 and 2000. Five years postoperatively, we noted the Harris hip score (HHS) and patient satisfaction, assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 1 to 10. Results: The rTHA patients were older (72 yeras versus 68 years, p=0.004), more frequently obese (BMI30: 33% versus 19%, p=0.003) and presented more co-morbid conditions involving medical ( 2: 46% versus 21%, p< 0.001) and orthopedic ( 2: 13% versus 7%, p=0.053) problems. Five years after surgery, quality-of-life and patient satisfaction were much lower after rTHA than after pTHA (HHS < 70; 31% versus 9%, p< 0.001; satisfaction score 8: 68% versus 85%, p< 0.001). Adjustment for the preoprative status (ASA, medical and orthopedic comorbidity, BMI, gender, age) attenuated these differences which nevertheless remained significant [non-adjusted HHS difference: 11.5 (95%CI: 7.4–15.7); adjusted difference: 8.8 (95%CI: 5.5–12.1)]. In both groups, a low HHS was associated with BMI ≥ 30, poor preoperative function, 2 joints affected, elderly age. Obesity was associated with even poorer results after rTHA than after pTHA (non-adjusted difference, p=0.026). Discussion: Quality-of-life and patient satisfaction at five years were clearly poorer after rTHA than after pTHA. This is in agreement with data in the literature. The difference is explained in particular by greater patient age and more associated comorbidities for rTHA. Obesity is a prognostic factor which is more unfavorable after rTHA than after pTHA. Conclusion: Considering the risks and benefits of revision surgery, it is important to recognize not only the surgical factors but also the characteristic features of the patients

Aim. Serum parameters continue to be a focus of research in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Several workgroups have recently proposed serum Albumin-Globulin-Ratio (AGR) as a potential new biomarker. Due to controversies in the literature, its usability in clinical practice remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the value of serum AGR in diagnosing PJI preoperatively, especially in comparison with the well-established marker C-reactive Protein (CRP). Method. From January 2015 to June 2022, patients with indicated revision hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasty were included in this retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. A standardized diagnostic workup was performed using the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of PJI, excluding CRP. Diagnostic accuracies of serum AGR and CRP were calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. A z-test was used to compare the area under the curves (AUC). Results. A total of 275 patients with rTHA and rTKA were included, 144 joints (52.4%) were identified as septic. Decreased AGR and elevated CRP were strongly associated with PJI, optimal diagnostic thresholds were calculated with 1.253 and 9.4 mg/L, respectively. Sensitivities were 62.5% (95%-confidence interval: 54.3–70.0) and 73.6% (65.8–80.1), and specificities 84.7% (77.5–89.9) and 87.8% (80.9–92.4), respectively. CRP showed a significantly higher AUC than AGR (0.807 (0.761–0.853) and 0.736 (0.686–0.786); p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis of acute versus chronic infections yielded significantly higher diagnostic accuracies in acute PJI for both parameters (p<0.0001). Similar results were observed when focusing on the causative microorganism; a better diagnostic performance was observed in high-virulence PJI compared to low-virulence PJI (p≤0.005). Furthermore, higher AUCs were calculated in knee PJI compared with hip PJI, with a significant difference for AGR (p=0.043). Conclusions. Due to its limited diagnostic accuracy, serum AGR cannot be recommended as an additional marker for diagnosing PJI. Serum parameters are generally unspecific and can be influenced by comorbidities and other foci of infection. Additionally, parameters may remain within normal levels in low-grade PJI. Evaluating AGR, further possible pitfalls must be considered, for example an increased latency until bottom values are reached and the impact of malnutrition

Background:. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been proven to be successful in achieving adequate pain relief and favorable outcomes in patients suffering from hip osteoarthritis (OA). However, leg length discrepancy (LLD) is still a significant cause of morbidities such as nerve damage, low back pain and abnormal gait. Despite most of the reported values of LLD in the literature being within the acceptable threshold of < 10 mm, some patients still report dissatisfaction, leading to litigation against orthopedic surgeons. However, lower extremity lengthening is sometimes necessary to achieve adequate hip joint stability and prevent dislocations. The purpose of this study was to compare LLD in patients undergoing THA using three different techniques: conventional anterior-approach THA (ATHA), conventional posterior-approach THA (PTHA), and robotic-assisted posterior-approach THA (RTHA) using the MAKO™ robotic hip system. Materials and Methods:. All cases of RTHA, ATHA and PTHA that were performed by the senior surgeon between Sep 2008 and Dec 2012 were reviewed. Patients included in this study had a primary diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis, with available and proper post-operative antero-posterior pelvis radiographs. All radiographs were calibrated and measurements done twice by two blinded observers. Results:. After exclusions, 67 RTHA cases, 29 ATHA cases and 59 PTHA cases were included in this study. There was a strong inter- and intra-observer correlation for all LLD measurements (r > 0.9, p < 0.001 in all). Mean LLD in the RTHA, ATHA and PTHA groups was 2.7 ± 1.8 mm (CI. 95. : 2.3, 3.2), 1.8 ± 1.6 mm (CI. 95. : 1.2, 2.4) and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm (CI. 95. : 1.5, 2.4) respectively (p = 0.01). When LLD > 3 mm was set as an outlier, the percentage of patients in the RTHA, ATHA and PTHA groups was 37.3%, 17.2% and 22% respectively (p value range, 0.06–0.78). When LLD > 5 mm was set as an outlier, the percentage of patients in the RTHA, ATHA and PTHA groups was 10.4%, 6.9% and 8.5% respectively (p value range, 0.72–1.0). None of the patients in all three groups had LLD ≥ 10 mm (Figure 1). Conclusion:. The results of the current study demonstrate the accuracy of the MAKO™ system in obtaining minimal LLD compared to the conventional anterior-approach and conventional posterior-approach THA, with no cases having LLD > 10 mm

Introduction. Instability accounts for one third of revision total hip arthroplasty(rTHA) performed in the United Kingdom. Removal of well-fixed femoral stems in rTHA is challenging with a risk of blood loss and iatrogenic damage to the femur. The Bioball Universal Adaptor (BUA) (Merete, Germany), a modular head neck extension adaptor, provides a mechanism for optimisation of femoral offset, leg length and femoral anteversion. This can avoid the need for femoral stem revision in selected cases. There is a relative paucity of clinical data available with the use of this device. Aim. The aim of this study is to present the clinical results and rate of instability following revision with this head neck adaptor at a minimum of two years' follow up. Patients and Methods. A review of our prospectively collected database was performed. All patients treated with the Bioball device were included. Clinical and radiologic review were performed pre- and post-surgery. Specific enquiry for instability was made. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Euro-Quol (EQ-5D) score and WOMAC scores were calculated pre-and post-operatively. Complications were recorded. Statistical analysis using a Students t-test with a significance level of p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results. Thirty-two rTHA procedures were performed using the Bioball device between 2013 and 2016. Four patients did not wish to complete post-operative questionnaires. These had no complaints regarding their revised hips and were functioning well. Two patients (2/28, 7%) complained of recurrent dislocations following their rTHA procedure. One patient complained of instability but no dislocation. The median pre-operative EQ-5D was 0.195 (range −0.07 to 0.85), OHS was 20 (range 5 to 43) and WOMAC was 29.8 (range 15.5 to 52.3). The median EQ-5D was 0.85 (range 0.59 to 1), OHS was 39 (range 21 to 48) and WOMAC was 91.1 (range 44.5 to 99.2) at final follow up. There were significant improvements in the EQ-5D (p = 0.0009), OHS (p = 0.0004) and WOMAC (p = 0.0001). Conclusion. The Bioball Head Neck Adaptor is associated with significant functional improvement and relatively low dislocation rates in revision THA. It is a viable option for use in the revision setting

We designed a study to evaluate whether (1) there were differences in PROMs between different reasons for revision THA at baseline, (2) there was a different interaction effect for revision THA for all PROMs, and (3) complication and re-revision rates differ between reason for revision THA. Prospective cohort of 647 patients undergoing rTHA, with a minimum of 2 years FU. The reason for revision were classified as infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, structural failure and painful THA with uncommon causes. PROMs (EQ-5D score, Oxford hip score (OHS), VAS pain, complication and failure rates were compared between different groups. Patients with different reason for revision had improvement of PROMs’ over time. Preoperatively, patients revised due to infection and aseptic loosening had poorer OHS and EQ-5D than patients with other reason for revision. Pain scores at baseline were highest in patients revised due to dislocation. Infection and aseptic loosening groups also showed a significant interaction effect over time in both OHS and EQ-5D. No PROMs significant differences between groups were observed 2 years postoperatively. Overall complications, and re-revision rates were 35.4 and 9.7% respectively. The reason for revision THA did not associate with clinical outcomes. Good outcomes were reached regardless of the reason for revision, as patients with the poorest pre-operative scores had the best improvement in PROMs over time. Complication and re-operation rates were relatively high, in line with previous reports, but did not differ between different reasons for revision THA

Aim. The aim of this study is to evaluate if obesity negatively affects: (1) complication rate, (2) reoperation and revision rate and (3) functional outcome (based on patient reported outcome measures, PROMs) in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). To our knowledge this is the only recent study to prospectively review these three aspects in what might be considered challenging rTHA. Methods. 444 rTHAs (cup, stem, both, n= 265, 57, 122 respectively), performed in a specialized high-volume orthopaedic center from 2013 to 2015, were prospectively followed. Complications and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were evaluated at 4 months, 1 year and 2 years. Thirtyfour patients had a BMI >35 kg/m2 (obese), of which thirteen patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2 (morbidly obese). Results. Infection following rTHA was more common in obese patients (8/34: 24%) and in morbidly obese patients (5/13: 38%) than in non-obese patients (15/410: 4%; p's < 0.001). No differences between obese and non-obese groups for other complications were observed (aseptic loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic fractures, thromboembolic events). Reoperation and revision rates were similar overall (p = 0.067 / 0.303 respectively) and due to infection (p = 0.469 / 0.879 respectively) for obese and non-obese groups. Scores on the OHS improved from 42 ±13 at baseline to 27±12 at 1 and 2 year follow-up (p < 0.001). Obese patients had overall poorer OHS scores than non-obese patients (p < 0.001), but improvement of OHS did not differ between obese and non-obese patients (p = 0.198). Conclusion. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of infection following revision THA. Patients with high BMI should be counselled appropriately before surgery

Safe and meticulous removal of the femoral cement mantle and cement restrictor can be a challenging process in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Many proximal femoral osteotomies have been described to access this region however they can be associated with fracture, non-union and revision stem instability. The aim of this study is to report outcomes of our previously unreported vascularised anterior window to the proximal femur. We report on a cohort of patients who underwent cemented single and staged rTHA at our single institution by the same surgeon between 2012 and 2017 using a novel vascularised anterior window of the femur to extract the cement mantle and restrictor safely under direct vision. We describe our technique, which maintains the periosteal and muscular attachments to the osteotomised fragment, which is then repaired with a polymer cerclage cable. In all revisions a polished, taper slip, long stem Exeter was cemented. Primary outcome measures included the time taken for union and the patient reported WOMAC score. Thirty-two rTHAs were performed in 29 consecutive patients (13 female, 16 male) with a mean age of 63.4 years (range, 47–88). The indications for revision included infection, aseptic loosening and implant malpositioning. Mean follow up was 5.3 (range, 3.2–8 years). All femoral windows achieved radiographic union by a mean of 7.2 weeks. At the latest point in follow-up the mean WOMAC score was 21.6 and femoral component survivorship was 100%. There were no intraoperative complications or additional revision surgery. Our proposed vascularised anterior windowing technique of the femur is a safe and reproducible method to remove the distal femoral cement and restrictor under direct vision without the need for perilous instruments. This method also preserves the proximal bone stock and provides the surgeon with the option of cemented stems over uncemented revision implants that predominantly rely on distal fixation

Resurfacing THA is claimed to transfer stress naturally to the femur neck and preserve proximal femoral bone mass postoperatively. DXA is an established method in estimating BMD around a standard THA, but due to the anteversion of the femur neck, rotation could affect the size of the neck-regions and thereby the BMD measurements around a RTHA. To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the effects of hip rotation on BMD in the femoral neck around a RTHA. We scanned the femoral neck of 15 patients twice in each position of 15° inward, 0° and 15° outward rotation, and analyzed BMD in a single and a six-region model. CVs were calculated for BMD in the same position as well as between different positions. For double measurements in the same position we found mean CVs of 3.1% (range 2.5% – 3.7%) and 4.6% (range 2.2% – 8.6%) in the one- and six-region models, respectively. When the 15° outward position was excluded, the CVs decreased to 2.8% and 4.0%. With rotation, the mean CVs rose to 5.4% (range 3.2%–7.2%) and 11.8% (range 2.7% – 36.3%). This effect was most pronounced in the 6-region model, predominantly in the lateral and distal parts of the femoral neck, where the change was significantly different from the fixated position. For the single-region model 15° rotation could be allowed without compromising the precision. We conclude that rotation adversely affects the precision of BMD measurements around a RTHA, but in the single-region model smaller rotations can be allowed. With the hip fixated the six-region model produces low CVs, acceptable for longitudinal studies. For maximal topographical detail we prefer the six-region model and recommend that future longitudinal DXA studies, including RTHA, be performed standardised, Preferably, with the hip in the neutral or internal rotation

Introduction: The number of revision Total Hip Arthroplasties (rTHA) continues to rise in an ageing population. High fracture rates reported point out that stem removal is associated with substantial surgical complications. Extensive Trochanteric Osteotomies (ETO) may facilitate stem removal; however, it has also been associated with hazards like increased incidence of non-union, fracture of the osteotomy fragment and stem subsidence. It is not yet clear if a permissive indication for ETO may lead to better postoperative results, than removing stem and cement from the top of the femur eventually causing fractures. This study describes our experience, comparing peri-operative femoral fractures during stem removal with ETOs in rTHA. Patients & Methods: Between 1992 and 2004 45 perioperative fractures during rTHA were compared to a collective of 28 ETOs. Pre-Op and after a follow-up period of 32 months (range, 21.6 – 76 months) patients were examined clinically and radiographically. Investigation parameters were Harris-Hip score, SF-36 health score, function (0 – 6) and pain (0 – 10) score, limp, postoperative complications, implant survival and radiographic parameters (stem and trochanter migration, stem alignment, bone union). Fractures were graded using the Vancouver classification. Results: Harris hip score increase was 31 points (p = 0.004) in ETO patients and 17 points in patients with femoral fractures during stem removal. Increase for function and pain was 1.5 points and 4.4 points in ETO patients and 2 points and 3 points in patients with perioperative femoral fractures. SF-36 health score showed better increases in patients with ETOs. Joint luxation occurred in 3 (6.7%) patients with perioperative fractures and once (3.6%) in the osteotomy group. Infections were more frequently after ETO. 2 patients showed Trendelenburg gait after ETO, but were satisfied with the operation. 1 (3.6%, 12 mm) stem in the ETO group and 3 (6.7%, mean 15 mm) stems in the fracture group subsided slightly. No cable failure was detected in the ETO group, but 2 (4.4%) in the fracture group. 1 osteotomy fragment and 3 femoral fractures showed nonunion and needed re-revision. Every implanted stem had excellent alignment within standard error of ± 3°. Discussion: Our results suggest that permissive indication for ETO in rTHA may lead to better postoperative results. Especially in patients with poor bone stock, where intraoperative fractures may likely occur, proper implant exposure and rigid fragment fixation may be crucial for success. Although the ETO might be associated with nonunion and limp, this study, as well as others, demonstrates that these observations do not necessarily compromise patient satisfaction. Conclusively, risking femoral fractures during stem removal is prejudicially, compared to proper, extensive femoral osteotomies in rTHA

Early reports on revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) suggested that outcomes of this procedure are as good as those of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, RTHA is associated with longer surgery time, greater blood loss and increased risk of complications (thromboembolism, nerve injury, periprosthetic fractures, recurrent hip dislocations and infections). Aseptic loosening after RTHA was reported in 36% of patients aged over 55 years within 4 years after revision. Infections were reported in 32% and complications during surgery in 23% of patients respectively. Unsatisfactory results of RTHA stimulate the search for alternative procedures. Girdlestone excision arthroplasty (GA) seems to be a good solution for older patients with high risk of complications related to a poor general condition. Material and method Between 2000 and 2003 we operated 39 patients, 10 for septic (26%) and 29 aseptic (74%) loosening of their THA. All patients complained of painful limb aggravated by weight bearing and the severity of pain was the main indication for the surgery. Average survival time of previous THA was 9 year (range: 1 to 20). We assessed pain, walking distance and the need to use walking aids. The outcomes were measured according to the Harris Hip Scale. The patients had the GA performed. The procedure involved removing implant and bone cement and placing the major trochanter into bone acetabulum. If an infection was present, an antibiotic irrigation system was introduced. No cast or braces were used and walking was started 2–7 days after surgery, depending on patients general condition. Results Good pain control was reported by 33 (85%) patients. The average Harris Hip Score changed from 25 points preoperatively to 53 at latest follow-up. Average limb shortening was 4 centimetres (range: 2 to 8). Walking aids (one or two crutches) were required by all patients. Eighteen (46%) patients walked more than 500 m, 12 (31%) patients walked 200–500 m and 9 (23%) patients walked less than 200 m, of whom one patient was wheelchair bound. Infection ceased in 9 cases, 1 patient died because of complications related to chronic infection. Discussion GA yields satisfactory results in patients who have to have their prostheses removed. It provides a mobile, painless joint. The disadvantages of GA are: limb shortening and unstable gait which requires the use of crutches. This procedure should be indicated for patients with high risk of complications due to poor general health, infection and/or massive loss of bone stock which render more invasive procedures impossible. GA is also advisable in patients with weak hip abductor muscles, when RTHA is associated with a high risk of recurrent hip dislocation. The Girdlestone arthroplasty is a satisfactory salvage procedure in most cases of failed THA, when the choice of reimplantation exposes the patient to a high risk of further failure

Aims

United Classification System (UCS) B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasties (THAs) have been commonly managed with modular tapered stems. No study has evaluated the use of monoblock fluted tapered titanium stems for this indication. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a monoblock stems on implant survivorship, postoperative outcomes, radiological outcomes, and osseointegration following treatment of THA UCS B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures.

The December 2022 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Fix and replace: simultaneous fracture fixation and hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in older patients; Is the revision rate for femoral neck fracture lower for total hip arthroplasty than for hemiarthroplasty?; Femoral periprosthetic fractures: data from the COMPOSE cohort study; Dual-mobility cups and fracture of the femur; What’s the deal with outcomes for hip and knee arthroplasty outcomes internationally?; Osteochondral lesions of the femoral head: is costal cartilage the answer?

Aims

The aim of this modified Delphi process was to create a structured Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) which can be used as a tool to help direct multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions of complex cases in local or regional revision networks.

The October 2023 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Cementless total knee arthroplasty is associated with more revisions within a year; Kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasties: long-term follow-up; Aspirin thromboprophylaxis following primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of early periprosthetic joint infection compared with other agents; The impact of a revision arthroplasty network on patient outcomes; Re-revision knee arthroplasty in a tertiary centre: how does infection impact on outcomes?; Does the knee joint have its own microbiome?; Revision knee surgery provision in Scotland; Aspirin is a safe and effective thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Patellar resurfacing and kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Purpose: Instability is a major cause of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). It was the third leading cause (5%) after aseptic loosening (75.7%), and infection (7.2%) in the Swedish registry for 2000. The rate of dislocation is however variable depending on the reported series. We conducted a statistical analysis of nearly 3000 files of rTHA to study factors favouring failure. Material and methods: AVIO, a watch association for orthopaedic implants, was created in 1994 to evaluate factors favouring failure of THA in France, and to furnish statistical data on prosthesis revision. About one hundred orthopaedic surgeons throughout France completed an information card for each revision for a five year period (September 1994 to September 1999). A total of 2926 card were analysed. Patient data (gender, side, number of revisions, age at implantation, age at removal, reason for THA, reason for revision, duration of THA) were cross analysed. The statistical analysis was conducted with chi-square tests and non-parametric tests. Significant results were compared with data in the literature. We present here the results concerning dislocation as the reason for revision. Results: The rTHA for dislocation accounted for 9.2% of the revisions. Dislocation was the primary reason for revision in patients with repeated revisions and was also the main reason for revision in patients aged over 70 years (20.6%). In this group of older patients, 72.8% of the prostheses were implanted for degenerative disease. Discussion: The original finding in this study, not clearly reported in the literature, is that dislocation is the primary cause of revision after 70 years, coming before aseptic acetabular loosening. Although mentioned by Charnley in 1979, very few studies (Newington in 1990, Edelund in 1992) have studied the relationship between dislocation and age. Conclusion: Patient-related factors play an important role in the stability of THA. After 70 years, dislocation becomes the primary reason for revision and should be taken into consideration in our ageing population. This study has led us to modify our therapeutic strategy in patients aged over 70 years

Purpose of the study: Loss of acetabular bone stock is a very common finding at revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The acetabular bone defect can be filled with an autograft or with cyropreserved or lyophilized and radiated allografts. The permanent availability lypophylized radiated allografts is a certain advantage. For more than ten years (1994), we have used Phoenix® (TBF) lyophylized radiated bone grafts. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who underwent rTHA for aseptic loosening between 1994 and 1999 with replacment of the acetabular implant requiring use of a lyophyilized radiated allograft (TBF, Phoenix®) fashioned from femoral heads and cut to fit. Grafts were impacted followed by acetabulra replacement with a cemented polyethylene (PE) cup or a Kerboull retaining ring, or an ace-tabular grid as needed. This procedure was used for 18 hips (16 patients). The Postel-Merle-d’Aubigné (PMA) clinical score and radiographic assessment were noted at five years with the Paprovsky classification. In addition, the status of the allograft (homogeneous aspect) and the presence of a lucent line between the host bone and the allograft were noted. Results: One patient was lost to follow-up. The analysis thus included 17 of 18 hips. Mean age was 63 years at rTHA surgery and 55 years at primary surgery. The reason for revision was cup loosening (n=13), isolated PE wear (n=4) with acetabular bone defects. The mean preoperative PMA score was 10.4 (range 5–18). At three months, the PMA score was 15.2 (range 12–18), at one year 16.2 (range 15–18), and at five years 17.2 (range 16–18). Implant migration was not observed on the five-year x-rays. Allografts were incorporated for seven hips which presented a homogeneous graft image. Five hips presented a partial lucent line and five a complete lucent line but with no evidence of implant instability. None of the patients required surgical revision to change the implant or for a new bone graft. Discussion: Acetabular revisions are often associated with bone defects which can be filled with allografts. This study demonstrated the good incorporation of lyophilized radiated allografts. This incorporation is progressive with good implant stability at more than five years. Use of this graft material for filling acetabular defects can correct for the bone deficiency. Conclusion: Use of lyophilized grafts gives satisfactory results with reliable outcome at five years comparable with other bone replacement methods, particularly cyropreserved femoral grafts used before 1994

Cementless distally locked stems were introduced in revision hip arthroplasty (RTHA) in the late 1980s to deal with severe femoral bone loss. These implants have not been assessed over the long-term, particularly the influence of the design and porous coating. Therefore we performed a retrospective case-control study at a minimum 10-years' follow-up comparing the straight Ultime™ stem with 1/3 porous coating versus the anatomical Linea™ stem with 2/3 proximal coating with hydroxyapatite. We performed a single-center case-control study measuring survival, function based the Harris and Oxford-12 scores, and rate of thigh pain. X-rays were done at regular intervals and at follow-up. No femoral bone graft was used at insertion. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex and follow-up (mean 12.2 years in Ultime and 10.8 years in Linea cohorts); however they differed in the severity of bone loss therefore the results were adjusted according to this variable. Ten-year survival considering revision for any reason was 63.5% ± 5.4 for Ultime and 91.6% ± 2.7 for Linea (p < 0.001). Merle d'Aubigné scores and Oxford-12 were higher in the Linea group 82.9 ± 12.4 and 26.3/48, respectively, versus 69.5 ± 16 and 21/48 in the Ultime group (p < 0.001). Thigh pain was observed in 30% of Ultime cases versus 3% of Linea cases. Bone reconstruction measured via cortical thickness was better in the Linea group and correlated to metaphyseal filling at insertion. This study confirms the benefits of using of locked stems in RTHA with severe bone loss. Better metaphyseal filling and optimized porous coating help to minimize thigh pain and the revision rate

Aims

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging as the symptoms are similar to other conditions, and the markers used for diagnosis have limited sensitivity and specificity. Recent research has suggested using blood cell ratios, such as platelet-to-volume ratio (PVR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to improve diagnostic accuracy. The aim of the study was to further validate the effectiveness of PVR and PLR in diagnosing PJI.

Aims

Fungal periprosthetic joint infections (fPJIs) are rare complications, constituting only 1% of all PJIs. Neither a uniform definition for fPJI has been established, nor a standardized treatment regimen. Compared to bacterial PJI, there is little evidence for fPJI in the literature with divergent results. Hence, we implemented a novel treatment algorithm based on three-stage revision arthroplasty, with local and systemic antifungal therapy to optimize treatment for fPJI.

Aims

Although readmission has historically been of primary interest, emergency department (ED) visits are increasingly a point of focus and can serve as a potentially unnecessary gateway to readmission. This study aims to analyze the difference between primary and revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) cases in terms of the rate and reasons associated with 90-day ED visits.

Aims

Orthopaedic infection is a potentially serious complication of elective and emergency trauma and orthopaedic procedures, with a high associated burden of morbidity and cost. Optimization of vitamin D levels has been postulated to be beneficial in the prevention of orthopaedic infection. This study explores the role of vitamin D in orthopaedic infection through a systematic review of available evidence.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine satisfaction rates after hip and knee arthroplasty in patients who did not respond to postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), characteristics of non-responders, and contact preferences to maximize response rates.

Purpose of the study: We have had a growing number of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) which have required femorotomy, either planned preoperatively, or required because of difficult extraction of the cemented implant. Few results have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this work was to evaluate late healing of femoral bone and complications. Material and methods: For this retrospective analysis, we included 43 patients, mean age 66 years. These patients had a femorotomy during rTHA performed from 1997 to 2008. There were 37 revisions in an aseptic context for isolated femoral loosening (n=26), bipolar loosening (n=4), acetabular loosening (n=4), recurrent dislocation, fracture of the femoral stem, and periprosthetic fracture (n=1 each); there were six revisions in septic conditions. Techniques were: femorotomy (n=22), wide trochanterotomy measuring proximally to distally 12 cm, four cortical cuts and one oblique osteotomy to correct valgus. The reconstruction used locked femoral stems (n=17), cemented stems (n=17) and non-cemented stems (n=10). The osteotomies were closed with cerclage or steel wires. Results: Bone healing was assessed on the plain x-rays of the hip joint at three, six and twelve months. Among the 43 patients included in this analysis, complete data were available for 37. There were 36 cases of successful healing and one case of nonunion on a wide trochanterotomy. The function outcome was assessed a mean three years. Discussion: Femorotomy remains a difficult technique, sometimes facilitating stem extraction, but with a high risk of morbidity. The morbidity is difficult to evaluate initially, linked more with time to weight-bearing at two months on average. In this small series we nevertheless found few problems with bone healing, even in septic conditions. Conclusion: Femorotomy remains a valid option when required. It is a difficult technique but provides reliable results in terms of complete healing three months postoperatively

Purpose: Postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is a frequent complication. Certain risk factors have been well identified (greater trochanter non-union, history of repeated dislocation or infection, multiple operations), but the role of spinal morphology is not well known. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the role of spinal morphology on postoperative dislocation. Material and methods: Between September 2000 and March 2002, 49 patients underwent rTHA. The prospective analysis included a preoperative radiographic evaluation of the spinal morphology for lumbopelvic assessment using the Legave and Duval Beaupère criteria. A standard information card was used pre- intra- and postoperatively to record usual patient- and material-related risk factors of dislocation. Five patients experienced postoperative dislocation despite any apparent defect in implant position. Results: Mean sacral slope was significantly different (p=0.006) between patients with and without dislocation. This difference remained significant (p=0.017) when limiting the study to the 33 patients who had no associated risk factor postoperatively (history of recurrent dislocation or infection, multiple operations, tight non-union of the greater trochanter). Discussion: Our study demonstrated the role of lumbar morphology on the risk of postoperative dislocation. Spinal morphology modifies the pelvic orientation and thus landmarks habitually used for implantation. It also affects the amplitude of pelvic movement when moving from the sitting to standing position, requiring hip compensation, particularly extension

Aims

The primary aim of this paper was to outline the processes involved in building the Partners Arthroplasty Registry (PAR), established in April 2016 to capture baseline and outcome data for patients undergoing arthroplasty in a regional healthcare system. A secondary aim was to determine the quality of PAR’s data. A tertiary aim was to report preliminary findings from the registry and contributions to quality improvement initiatives and research up to March 2019.

Purpose: The rate of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) has varied from 8 to 28% in published series. Many causes are involved, but little work has been focused on the incidence of spinal disease in patients with postoperative dislocation. Material and methods: We performed a prospective analysis of 267 patients who had undergone RTHA in search of risk factors of postoperative dislocation. Chi-square test or Student’s t test were used for the statistical analysis as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: We excluded 37 patients who had undergone first line THA with a restrained cup and who had not experienced dislocation. The 230 patients retained for analysis had undergone primary surgery with no intra or postoperative anti-dislocation measure. Among these, 31 (13.4% experienced dislocation). The cause was evident in ten cases (malposition, fracture of the greater trochanter, sciatic paralysis). For the other 21 patients, age, gender, types of surgery (uni or bipolary), surgical approach, size of the implant, and size of the femoral or acetabular defects were not found to influence the rate of postoperative dislocation. Conversely, a significant relationship was found between increased rate of dislocation and history of repeated dislocations (p < 0.001), prior surgery (p< 0.05), and association with spinal disease (p< 0.02). Characteristically, there was either radicular, or spinal disease, or both. Retrospective analysis of the radiograms showed that the measures of sacral incidence and inclination of lumbar lordosis were not predictive of dislocation. Inversely, the projection of a vertical line passing through the centre of rotation of the hips on L3 was different in patients who had experienced dislocation and those who had not (p< 0.02). Discussion: This study confirms the role of a history of dislocation and prior surgery in the risk of postoperative dislocation. It also shows that associated spinal disease, which may results from radicular disease, as well as altered spinal static can have an influence. A prospective study is currently under way to distinguish these features

Purpose: Filling bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty raises many problems related both to the surgical technique and to the type of bone substitute used. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and radiographic results obtained in a series of femur reconstructions using impacted calcium phosphate ceramics. Material and methods: The technique used here was derived from the method developed for impacted fragmentary grafts by Ling and Gie. Grains of macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (MBCP) were impacted into the femoral shaft to obtain a stable sheath into which the stem could be cemented (Ceraver Osteal). This technique was used from March 1996 to october 2000 in 18 patients (20 hips) undergoing revision for femoral loosening in 11 (including septic loosening in eight), femoral osteolysis (one hip), pain (one hip), and instability (one hip). Mean age ate revision was 66 years (range 30–79). Most of the femoral bone defects were classed grade IV. The grains of MBCP were used alone in 13 cases, in a mixture with allografts in five cases, and in a mixture with autologous bone in two cases. Results: Mean follow-up was 31 months (range 8–70). None of the patients were lost to follow-up. There were two intraoperative femur shaft fractures which healed without sequela. Two patients required a second revision for loosening (including one septic) 20 and 16 months after the first revision. At last follow-up, the mean PMA score had improved to 16 (12–18) (p< 0.05) and 67% of the patients achieved a good or excellent clinical result. Radiologically, there were 14 cases of good osteointegration of the MBCP grains without implant migration. Mean shortening was 3 mm (3–5) was observed in three cases and a stable incomplete lucent line was observed in one patient with no clinical impact. Discussion: Calcium phosphate ceramic material can be useful to overcome the problem of major bone loss in RTHA. It provides an attractive alternative to the disadvantages of bone grafting and helps, in theory, improve primary implant stability. The original technique presented here has allowed us to achieve promising short-term results in young patients with an adequate femur

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to assess the quality of the bone reconstruction in contact with the long hydroxyapatite-coated locked femoral stem used in a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). Material and methods: This series of 20 patients underwent RTHA for aseptic loosening (n=15) or septic loosening (n=5) of an AURA prosthesis. Mean age was 70.5 years. Mean time between insertion of the first stem and revision was 11 years for the aseptic patients and 2.6 years for the septic patients. Bony lesions of the femur were assessed with the SOFCOT classification: grade I=5, grade II=4, grade III=4, and grade IV=1. A transfemoral approach with a floating femoral segment was used in 14 patients and an endofemoral approach in six. The septic loosenings were reconstructed in two operative times in four patients and in one operation in one patient. An AURA reconstruction stem was used in 15 cases and a revision stem in five. A complementary cancellous bone graft with the endofemoral approach was used in six patients. Results: Two patients died. All others were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 26 months (range 12–46 months) for clinical and radiographic assessment (five patients also had a supplementary scan at more than three years follow-up). We had three dislocations at 15 days with no recurrence and one case of sepsis at three months which cured after wash out and adapted antibiotics. All the femoral segments healed starting on the tenth week. The PMA score improved from 9.1 to 15.66 and the Harris score from 43.5 to 85.5. At last follow-up, all femoral lesions had moved to a lower SOFCOT score. There was a tight contact between the AURA stem and the femur on the last follow-up scan which showed an increase in the cortical index from 1 to 8 cm from the metaphyseal spine of the stem. None of the patients experienced secondary unlocking or required revision for a shorter stem. Discussion: Revision after femoral failure with bone destruction using a non-cemented hydroxyapatite-coated stem allows immediate prosthetic mechanical stability and intimate bone reconstruction in the metaphyseal diaphyseal region. This reconstruction is real even if a graft is not used and appears to be favoured by the femorotomy. Implantation of the long stem is not particularly difficult and can even make the operation easier. Femorotomy has a real advantage, particularly for the revision of septic stems or in the event of difficult explantation

Aims

Although good clinical outcomes have been reported for monolithic tapered, fluted, titanium stems (TFTS), early results showed high rates of subsidence. Advances in stem design may mitigate these concerns. This study reports on the use of a current monolithic TFTS for a variety of indications.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter).

A moderator and panel of five experts led an interactive session in discussing five challenging and interesting patient case presentations involving surgery of the hip. The hip pathologies reviewed included failed open reduction internal fixation of subcapital femoral neck fracture, bilateral hip disease, evaluation of pain after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty, avascular necrosis, aseptic loosening secondary to osteolysis and polyethylene wear, and management of ceramic femoral head fracture.