Modular junctions are ubiquitous in contemporary hip arthroplasty. The head-trunnion junction is implicated in the failure of large diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) hips which are the currently the topic of one the largest legal actions in the history of orthopaedics (estimated costs are stated to exceed $4 billion). Several factors are known to influence the strength of these press-fit modular connections. However, the influence of different head sizes has not previously been investigated. The aim of the study was to establish whether the choice of head size influences the initial strength of the trunnion-head connection. Ti-6Al-4V trunnions (n = 60) and two different sizes of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) heads (28 mm and 36 mm; 30 of each size) were used in the study. Three different levels of assembly force were considered: 4 kN; 5 kN; and 6 kN (n = 10 each). The strength of the press-fit connection was subsequently evaluated by measuring the pull-off force required to break the connection. The statistical differences in pull-off force were examined using a Kruskal–Wallis test and two-sample Mann–Whitney U test. Finite element and analytical models were developed to understand the reasons for the experimentally observed differences.Objectives
Materials and Methods
We present a case series of ten metal-on-polyethylene total hip
arthroplasties (MoP THAs) with delayed dislocation associated with
unrecognised adverse local tissue reaction due to corrosion at the
trunnion and pseudotumour formation. The diagnosis was not suspected in nine of the ten patients (six
female/four male; mean age 66 years), despite treatment in a specialist
unit (mean time from index surgery to revision was 58 months, 36
to 84). It was identified at revision surgery and subsequently confirmed
by histological examination of resected tissue. Pre-operative assessment
and culture results ruled out infection. A variety of treatment
strategies were used, including resection of the pseudotumour and
efforts to avoid recurrent dislocation. Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) complicates
between 0.5% and 1.2% primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and
may have devastating consequences. The traditional assessment of
patients suffering from PJI has involved the serological study of
inflammatory markers and microbiological analysis of samples obtained
from the joint space. Treatment has involved debridement and revision
arthroplasty performed in either one or two stages. We present an update on the burden of PJI, strategies for its
diagnosis and treatment, the challenge of resistant organisms and
the need for definitive evidence to guide the treatment of PJI after
THA. Cite this article:
Adverse reaction to wear and corrosion debris
is a cause for concern in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Modular junctions
are a potential source of such wear products and are associated
with secondary pseudotumour formation. We present a consecutive series of 17 patients treated at our
unit for this complication following metal-on-highly cross-linked
polyethylene (MoP) THA. We emphasise the risk of misdiagnosis as
infection, and present the aggregate laboratory results and pathological
findings in this series. The clinical presentation was pain, swelling or instability.
Solid, cystic and mixed soft-tissue lesions were noted on imaging
and confirmed intra-operatively. Corrosion at the head–neck junction
was noted in all cases. No bacteria were isolated on multiple pre-
and intra-operative samples yet the mean erythrocyte sedimentation
rate was 49 (9 to 100) and C-reactive protein 32 (0.6 to 106) and
stromal polymorphonuclear cell counts were noted in nine cases. Adverse soft–tissue reactions can occur in MoP THA owing to corrosion
products released from the head–neck junction. The diagnosis should
be carefully considered when investigating pain after THA. This
may avoid the misdiagnosis of periprosthetic infection with an unidentified
organism and mitigate the unnecessary management of these cases
with complete single- or two-stage exchange. Cite this article:
Total hip replacement causes a short-term increase
in the risk of mortality. It is important to quantify this and to identify
modifiable risk factors so that the risk of post-operative mortality
can be minimised. We performed a systematic review and critical
evaluation of the current literature on the topic. We identified
32 studies published over the last 10 years which provide either
30-day or 90-day mortality data. We estimate the pooled incidence
of mortality during the first 30 and 90 days following hip replacement
to be 0.30% (95% CI 0.22 to 0.38) and 0.65% (95% CI 0.50 to 0.81),
respectively. We found strong evidence of a temporal trend towards
reducing mortality rates despite increasingly co-morbid patients.
The risk factors for early mortality most commonly identified are
increasing age, male gender and co-morbid conditions, particularly
cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular complications appear to have
overtaken fatal pulmonary emboli as the leading cause of death after
hip replacement. Cite this article:
Hip arthrodesis remains a viable surgical technique
in well selected patients, typically the young manual labourer with
isolated unilateral hip disease. Despite this, its popularity with
patients and surgeons has decreased due to the evolution of hip
replacement, and is seldom chosen by young adult patients today.
The surgeon is more likely to encounter a patient who requests conversion
to total hip replacement (THR). The most common indications are
a painful pseudarthrosis, back pain, ipsilateral knee pain or contralateral
hip pain. Occasionally the patient will request conversion because
of difficulty with activities of daily living, body image and perceived
cosmesis. The technique of conversion and a discussion of the results
are presented. Cite this article:
