Introduction: It has been suggested that notching of the femoral neck during hip resurfacing weakens the proximal femur and predisposes to femoral neck fracture. We aimed to examine the effect of neck notching during hip resurfacing on the strength of the proximal femur.

Methods: 3^rd generation composite femurs that have been shown to replicate the biomechanical properties of human bone were utilised. The bone was secured in a position of single leg stance and tested with an Instron mechanical tester. Imageless computer navigation was used to position the initial guide wire during head preparation. Six specimens were prepared without a superior notch being made in the neck of the femur, six were prepared in an inferiorly translated position to cause a 2mm notch in the superior femoral neck and six were prepared with a 5mm notch. The femoral component was then cemented in place. All specimens had radiographs taken to ensure that the stem shaft angle was kept constant. The specimens were then loaded to failure in the axial direction.

Results: The 2mm notched group (mean load to failure 4034N) were significantly weaker than the un-notched group (mean load to failure 5302N) when tested to failure (p=0.017). The 5mm notched group (mean load to failure 3121N) were also significantly weaker than the un-notched group (p=0.0003) and the 2mm notched group (p=0.046). All fractures initiated at the superior aspect of the neck, at the component bone interface. All components were positioned in the same coronal alignment +/−2 degrees.

Discussion: A superior notch of 2mm in the femoral neck weakens the proximal femur by 24% and a 5mm notch weakens it by 41%. This study provides biomechanical evidence that notching of the femoral neck may lead to an increased risk of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing.

Thirty total hip replacements in twenty-eight patients in which a Zirconia/Polyethylene articulation was utilized were compared to a control group undergoing total hip replacement utilizing Cobalt-Chrome/Polyethylene articulation. These patients were matched for gender, BMI and pre-operative diagnosis.

At nine years after implantation there was no difference in the functional outcome between the two groups and no difference in liner wear rate on x-ray (Livermore technique). There was a 27% revision rate in the Zirconia group compared to the 11.5% revision rate in the Cobalt-Chrome group.

Bearing surfaces require long- term clinical follow-up to validate in vitro performance.

To determine the benefit of Zirconia on polyethylene versus cobalt-chrome on polyethylene in total hip articulation.

Zirconia offers no advantage over a cobalt-chrome head in decreasing in vivo polyethylene wear at ten- year follow-up.

Newer bearing surfaces require long- term clinical follow-up to validate in vitro laboratory performance.

All primary total hip replacements at this institution are entered prospectively in a database and are assessed on an annual basis. All patients in this study were followed for a mean of nine years with a range of six to thirteen years.

Thirty cementless total hip arthroplasties were performed in twenty-eight patients utilizing a Zirconia head coupled with a polyethylene acetabular component. Twenty-six hips have been followed for a mean of nine years. These were matched to a control group of twenty-six hips in twenty-six patients utilizing a cobalt-chrome head coupled with an identical polyethylene liner followed for a mean of ten years (range five to fourteen years). There was no functional difference in outcome at nine years between the two groups utilizing the Livermore technique there was no difference in the liner wear rate between the two patient groups. However, seven hips (27%) of the Zirconia group required revision due to loosening and/or extensive osteolysis around the cup and only three hips (11.5%) required revision in the cobalt-chrome group. Our study demonstrates that although changes in component designs and materials may offer theoretical advantages over current components their effect in vivo remains questionable.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture and to compare the long-term outcome of THA after previous open reduction and internal fixation or conservative treatment of the acetabular fracture.

Methods: Thirty-four patients (thirty-six hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty for arthritis resulting from an acetabular fracture. The mean age at the time of hip arthroplasty was 49 years. The mean follow-up was eight years and nine months (range, 4–17 years). The mean interval from fracture to arthroplasty was 7.5 years (range, 5 months-29 years). Twenty-three hips had been previously treated by open reduction and internal fixation and 12 hips had a conservatively treated fracture. An uncemented arthroplasty was performed in 31 hips, cemented arthroplasty in 2 patients and a hybrid replacement in 2 patients.

Results: Only 16 patients achieved and maintained a good to excellent result over the course of the follow-up. The mean Harris hip score improved from 44.5 points preoperatively to 72.76 points for operatively treated fractures (23 patients). The mean Harris hip score improved from 44.2 points preoperatively to 78.7 points for conservatively treated fractures (12 patients) (p> 0.05). Ten out of 35 hips required revision; 9 were revised because of aseptic loosening and one for infection with a total revision rate of 29%. Femoral bone quality was significant in predicting revision. No femoral radiographic loosening was found at latest follow-up. On the acetabular side, the rate of radiographic loosening was higher. There was no significant difference in bone grafting, heterotopic bone formation, revision rate, operative time and blood loss between the two groups (ORIF vs conservative treatment of acetabular fracture) (p> 0.05).

Conclusions: Outcome following total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture is less favourable than following primary osteoarthritis. Those patients initially treated conservatively had similar long term results compared to those treated primarily by open reduction and internal fixation. At long term follow-up, the main problem identified was osteolysis and acetabular wear.

Purpose: In uncemented total hip arthroplasty, stem design is one of the important factors influencing bone remodeling. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in bone remodeling between metaphyseal and diaphyseal fit stems.

Methods: Twenty-three patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (28 hips) with metaphyseal fit stems were matched to 27 patients (32 hips) undergoing uncemented total hip arthroplasty with diaphyseal fit stems. Preoperative radiographs were assessed for canal fill, canal shape, and bone quality. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for frequency and time of appearance of peri-prosthetic bone remodeling including spot welds, cortical hypertrophy and pedestal formation. All patients were examined by a modified Harris Hip Score.

Results: The proximal canal shape and bone quality were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the frequency of spot welds at 1 year and 2 years. Spot welds were mainly located in Gruen zone 1. Cortical hypertrophy was greater (p < 0.05) at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years with the metaphyseal fit stem. Cortical hypertrophy was found only in Gruen zones 3 and 5. Halo pedestal formation was greater (p < 0.05) at 6 months with the metaphyseal fit stem but not at 1 year and 2 years. Calcar rounding was observed in 25 hips (90.0%) with metaphyseal fit stems and twenty hips (62.5%) with diaphyseal fit stems. At the last follow-up, average HHS was similar (90.6 +/− 1.5 / 91.7 +/− 1.7; metaphyseal / diaphyseal fit stems). No patient developed aseptic loosening.

Conclusions: This is the first study to determine differences in bone remodeling between a metaphyseal and a diaphyseal fixed stem in uncemented THA. After one year, the only significant difference between these two groups was cortical hypertrophy, which was greater in patients undergoing metaphyseal fit stem insertion. Both stem designs demonstrated bone remodeling with no differences in spot welds or pedestal formation. At two years, there was no functional difference between these two patient groups. To further elucidate the relation between radiographic and clinical results, longer term follow-up is required.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of locking plates to conventional plate and allograft constructs for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Methods: Twenty synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending and torsion to characterize initial stiffness and stiffness following fixation of an osteotomy created at the tip of a cemented femoral component. Stiffness was tested with and without a 5mm gap. Axial load to failure was also tested. Four constructs were tested: Construct A – Synthes locked plate with unicortical locked screws proximally and bicortical locked screws distally; Construct B – Synthes locked plate with alternate unicortical locked screws and cables proximally and bicortical locked screws distally. Construct C – Zimmer cable plate with alternate unicortical non locked screws and cables proximally and bicortical non locked screws distally. Construct D – Zimmer cable plate in same fashion as construct C plus anterior strut allograft secured with cables proximally and distally.

Results: In axial compression, construct D was significantly stiffer compared with all other constructs in the presence of a gap, with no differences between groups without a gap. For lateral bending stiffness, construct D was significantly stiffer than the other groups with and without a gap. In torsional testing, construct D was significantly stiffer than all other constructs in the presence of a gap. With no gap, construct D was significantly stronger than construct B. There were no significant differences between constructs A and B in all testing modalities. Axial load-to-failure ranged from 5561.5 to 6700.2 N. There were no significant differences in axial load to failure.

Conclusions: This study suggests that a single locked plate does not provide the same initial fixation stiffness as a plate-allograft strut construct in the setting of a gapped osteotomy. This may be particularly important in the setting of a comminuted fracture or with bone loss. In these settings, a construct with a lateral plate and an allograft strut placed anteriorly at 90 degrees to the plate, may be optimal.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine how the “ideal” tibial nail insertion point varies with tibial rotation and to determine what radiographic landmarks can be used to identify the most suitable rotational view for insertion of a tibial intramedullary nail.

Methods: Twelve cadaveric lower limb specimens with intact soft tissues around the knee and ankle joints were used. A 2.0mm Kirschner wire was placed in the center of the anatomic safe zone and centered on the tibial shaft. The leg was rotated and imaged using a fluoroscopic C-arm until the K-wire was positioned just medial to the lateral tibial spine (defined as the neutral anteroposterior radiograph). The leg was then fixed and radiographs were taken in 5 degree increments by rotating the fluoroscope internally and externally (in total, a 50 degree arc). Following this a second K-wire was placed in 5 mm increments both medially and laterally and the fluoroscope rotated until this second K-wire was positioned just medial to the lateral tibial spine. Radiographs were digitized for measurements.

Results: Given the presence of a 30 degree rotational arc through which the radiograph appeared anteroposterior, it was possible to improperly translate the start point up to 15 mm. Relative external rotation of the image used for nail placement led to a medial insertion site when using the lateral tibial spine as the landmark. A line drawn at the lateral edge of the tibial plateau to bisect the fibula head correlated with an entry point that was central or up to 5 mm lateral to the ideal entry point. The use of a fibula head bisector line avoided a medial insertion point.

Conclusions: Rotation of the tibia may result in up to 15 mm of translation of the start point that may be unrecognized. Relative external rotation of the film used for nail placement leads to medial insertion sites when using the lateral tibial spine as a landmark. The fibula head bisector line can be used to avoid choosing external rotation views and thus avoid medial insertion points.

We evaluated the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) following vascularized fibular grafting for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. A group of twenty-two patients who had been converted from a vascularized fibular graft to THA was compared to a similar group of twenty-two patients who had received a THA with no prior graft. The graft group was found to have worse outcomes than the control group as measured by SF-36, and WOMAC scores, as well as a hip score.

These results show that vascularized fibular grafting complicates future THA.

The Purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) following vascularized fibular grafting for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. These results indicate that functional and clinical outcome following post-graft THA is worse than outcome following THA performed as a primary intervention.

Judicious use of the vascularized fibular graft procedure is critical in order to minimize the number of graft failures and avoid the negative outcomes associated with THA after failed vascularized fibular grafting.

Twenty-six hips in twenty-two patients who had a THA following a failed vascularized fibular graft were compared to a group of twenty-three hips in twenty-two age and sex-matched patients who had received a THA with no prior graft (combined mean age: 39.0 yrs). Primary outcome measures included the SF-36 (patient-based general health assessment – total score and physical sub-component) and WOMAC (patient-based arthritis specific score) scores at matched follow up times (mean: 6.2years, range: two to fourteen years). An objective hip score was also used, as were several radiographic variables. The post-graft group had lower SF-36 final scores (p< 0.006), lower SF-36: physical function scores (p< 0.001), and lower WOMAC scores (p< 0.045) than the control group. Post-graft THA was complicated by longer operative time (p< 0.025) and greater subsidence of the femoral prosthesis (p< 0.004) compared to controls. Additionally, the post-graft group had worse hip score values (p< 0.05) than controls.

Vascularized fibular grafting is a commonly used procedure to cure or delay progression of AVN in the hip. Currently this procedure is used for young (< 40 years) patients with hip AVN who are in an early, pre-collapse stage of the disease. Although the efficacy of vascularized fibular grafting has been proven, up to 29% of grafts fail at five years and need to be converted to THA (Urbaniak et al., 1995). This study shows that THA after failed vascularized fibular grafting has a worse outcome than THA as a primary intervention. Therefore judicious use of the graft procedure is critical in order to minimize the number of graft failures and avoid the negative outcomes associated with it.

Purpose: This cadaveric study examines how changes in femoral entry point for intramedullary instrumentation of total knee replacements affects femoral component positioning.

Methods: Twelve cadaveric lower limb specimens with intact hip, knee and ankle joints were obtained. Total knee navigation instrumentation was secured. Anatomical landmarks required for axes generation were obtained. An initial entry point was made at the center of the distal femur. An intramedullary rod was the introduced into the femur. Five and seven degree cutting blocks were placed onto the rod and positioned against the distal femur with the rotation parallel to the epicondylar axis. The navigation system was then used to generate a varus/valgus angle and flexion/extension angle with respect to the previously generated femoral mechanical axes. This allowed determination of an angle at which the distal femoral cutting block would need to be set to make a neutral distal femoral cut. The guide rod was removed and reinserted five times and measurements recalculated. Data was then collected with entry points 5mm medial, 5mm anterior and 5mm medial and anterior to the initial entry point.

Results: There was no significant difference in varus/ valgus angle with a central compared with 5mm anterior entry point and no difference with a 5mm medial versus 5 mm medial and anterior entry point. The valgus angle required to give a neutral distal femoral cut with a central entry point was 4.98o (SD 0.91o; range 3.5o–6.0o). The valgus angle for a 5mm medial entry point was 6.92o (SD 0.97o, range 5.5o–8.0o). With regards to the sagittal plane a 5mm anterior translation of the entry point changed the flexion/extension angle by 1.58o (SD 0.52o, range 0.5o–2.5o).

Conclusions: Small changes in the entry point can significantly affect component alignment. When moving more medial with the entry point a more valgus angle is required for the cutting block. An entry point at the deepest point of the trochlea may be more reproducible than an anteromedial one but requires a valgus cutting block closer to 5 degrees.

Funding : Commerical funding

Funding Parties : Stryker

This study investigated the effect presence, method, and timing of fixation of femoral shaft fractures have on the morbidity and mortality of patients with pulmonary contusion.

In the multiply-injured patient with femoral shaft fractures, early (< 24 hours) fracture stabilization with closed, reamed, statically-locked intramedullary nailing has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Controversy exists as to whether such treatment compromises the outcome in patients that have significant co-existing pulmonary injury. This study is the first to specifically investigate the sub-group of patients that have pulmonary contusion.

A retrospective review of patients presenting to a Level One trauma center from 1990 to 2002 with pulmonary contusion identified three hundred and twenty-two cases. Patient characteristics of age, sex, GCS, ISS, AIS, presence of femoral shaft fracture, method and timing of treatment of femoral shaft fracture, and presence of other pulmonary injuries were recorded, as were the outcomes of pulmonary complications (acute lung injury (ALI), ARDS, fat embolism syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia), days on ventilatory support, days in the intensive care unit and ward, and death.

There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics between groups with and without femoral shaft fracture. Except for an increased likelihood of the femoral shaft fracture group having ALI (RR 1.11), there were no significant differences in outcomes between the femur fracture/non-femur fracture groups. As well, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the groups that had fracture fixation before or after twenty-four hours or had the fracture fixed with or without intramedullary nailing.

The presence, method, and timing of treatment of femoral shaft fractures do not increase the morbidity or mortality of trauma patients that have pulmonary contusion.

Fifty-five patients undergoing isolated acetabular revisions in fifty-seven hips were available for review. In thirty-three of fifty-seven hips there was no significant acetabular deficiency; of the remaining twenty-four hips twenty underwent allograft reconstruction and four autogenous bone grafting. Mean follow-up was four years with a range of three to seven years; there have been no femoral loosening, and three further surgical procedures for hip instability. All acetabular components at last review were soundly fixed with the exception of one patient who underwent excision arthroplasty at twelve months for deep infection.

The purpose of this study was to review the functional outcome and the fate of the femoral stem and revised acetabular component following isolated ace-tabular revision.

Findings of the current study demonstrate that isolated acetabular revision does not compromise the final functional nor radiographic outcome in acetabular revision in appropriately selected patients; the fate of the femoral component is not adversely influenced by this procedure.

There is no need to remove the femoral component at the time of acetabular revision if the femoral component is well fixed and stable by pre- and intra-operative assessment.

Prospectively entered data on fifty-seven hips (fifty-five patients) who have undergone isolated acetabular revision without femoral revision was available for review. All patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively on an annual basis by means of physical examination, x-ray, SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires.

In thirty-three of fifty-seven hips there was no significant acetabular deficiency; of the remaining twenty-four hips, one had a segmental defect, thirteen had a cavitary defect and ten had a combined segmental and cavitary defect. Osteolysis existed in the proximal femur of two hips.

Bone grafting in twenty-four hips consisted of morselized allograft in nine; combined structural and morselized allograft used in eleven and autogenous bone used in four acetabular defects. Autogenous bone grafting was done in two femoral osteolytic lesions.

Mean follow-up was four years with a range of three to seven years. The mean duration of arthroplasty prior to revision was fourteen years (range four to twenty-three years).

There were no nerve palsies, vascular injuries or intra-operative fractures in this patient group. All ace-tabular components at latest review were soundly fixed with the exception of one patient who underwent excision arthroplasty at twelve months for deep infection. Twenty-one of the twenty-four hips with bone grafting demonstrated positive radiographic signs of incorporation; the remaining threehips have a stable interface but no evidence of bone ingrowth. Three of the fifty-seven hips presented with hip dislocations after revision arthroplasty; two were managed by closed reduction; the third by open reduction and soft tissue repair.

Revision hip arthroplasty does not bring to the patient the same degree of benefit as the primary operation. We compared two hundred and thirteen patients undergoing revision arthroplasty with five hundred and forty-seven patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. The complication rate in the revision arthroplasty group was approximately twice as high in the primary group (p< .05) primarily as a result of postoperative dislocation. Both groups of patients had a statistically significant improvement between their pre- and postoperative WOMAC and SF-36 physical scores; however, there was also a statistically significant difference in outcome when the two groups were compared, with primary patients having significantly improved WOMAC and SF-36 physical scores.

To compare the outcomes between primary and revision total hip arthroplasty patients at one institution with regard to demographics, complication rates and functional outcome.

Revision hip arthroplasty does not bring to the patient the same degree of benefit as does the primary operation. The reason for this is multi-factorial and includes a higher complication rate and lower functional outcome.

Further study of the problems associated with revision total hip replacement especially focused on complication rates would appear to be warranted.

All patients were entered prospectively in a database and were assessed by means of physical examination, radiographs, SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires. Patients were followed for a minimum of two years with a range of two to five years. Patients were seen on an annual basis.

Five hundred and forty-seven patients underwent primary total hip replacement and two hundred and thirteen patients underwent revision total hip replacement. 53.4% of patients undergoing primary and 52% of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty were female. Mean age at primary hip replacement 61.8 years, revision hip replacement 67.1 years. Post-operative complication rate was 7.6% in primary patients and 14.7% in revision patients (p< .05); there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to intra-operative fracture, implant loosening or postoperative infection; there was a statistically significant difference in terms of dislocation with 0.8% of primary arthroplasties and 5.6% of revision patients sustaining at least one dislocation following their surgery (p< .01). Both groups of patients had a statistically significant improvement between their pre- and post-operative WOMAC and SF-36 physical scores (p< .0001); however, there was also a statistically significant difference in outcome when the two groups were compared with primary patients having significantly improved WOMAC scores (p< .0001) and significantly improved SF-36 physical scores (p< .0001).

The purpose of this study was to determine which activities are important to patients and to determine the severity of those problems. The five most important activities were walking outside, driving, walking indoors, stair climbing and daytime pain. Importance of these did not change postoperatively. The five most severe problems causing limitation were a limp, stiffness, loss of energy, daytime pain and locking. All these activities become statistically less severe over twenty-four months. Activities that are important to patients are different than the problems that are ranked by severity. Surgeons can educate patients that the severity of problems do improve over time following TKA.

The objectives of this study were:

to determine the five most important activities and five most severe problems for patients prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the Patient Specific Index (PASI) and

Activities that are most important to patients are different than problems that patients find severe. Important activities remain important over time. Severe problems become less severe over time.

Functional activities and PASI scores improve after TKA. Surgeons can educate patients that the problems they find most severe preoperatively do improve over time following TKA. Important activities remain important.

Patients scheduled for elective primary (or revision) TKA at two tertiary care teaching hospitals were enrolled in the study, excluding those not fluent in English and those undergoing TKA for a tumour, acute fracture, or an infection of the prosthesis. Patients completed the PASI pre-operatively, six, twelve and twenty-four months post-operatively.

One hundred and nineteen subjects were enrolled, nineteen were excluded. The five most important activities (ten- point scale, ten is most important) preoperatively were (mean; 95% CI): walking outside (6.25; 6.23–6.27), driving (6.17; 6.12–6.22), walking indoors (6.14; 6.12–6.16), climbing stairs (6.12; 6.10–6.14), and daytime pain (5.84; 5.81–5.87). These activities were not statistically less important over time. The most severe problems were limping (4.81; 4.77–4.85), stiffness (4.59; 4.56–4.62), lack of energy (4.51; 4.47–4.55), daytime pain (4.46; 4.43–3.39) and locking (4.38; 4.27–4.49). These were significantly less severe at twenty-four months (p < .001).

This study (n=126, mean age=68.8 years, males=62) evaluated pre-operative WOMAC pain and physical function, age, gender, general health status, revision severity classification, number of revisions, comorbidity and unilateral vs. bilateral surgery as predictors of WOMAC pain and physical function at twenty-four months post revision hip arthroplasty. Pain improved from 9.3 to 3.6 and physical function improved from 35.4 to 17.1. No factors were predictive of patient function. Decreased pain was predicted by less pain pre surgery (p=0.01) and being male (p=0.04).

To determine if pre-operative WOMAC pain and physical function, age, gender, general health status (SF-36), revision severity classification, number of revisions, comorbidity and unilateral vs. bilateral surgery are predictive of WOMAC pain and physical function at twenty-four months post revision hip arthroplasty.

Physical function at twenty-four months is not independently predicted by the pre-treatment factors evaluated in this study. Male patients with less pain pre surgery and little comorbidity have less pain post surgery.

With the exception of pre-treatment pain, the pre-treatment factors tested in this study provide minimal guidance in identifying factors that might be modified to enhance patient outcome.

This prospective cohort study included one hundred and twenty-six patients (mean age=68.8 years, males: females=62:64) who had revision for other than infection or peri-prosthetic fracture. On average from pre-surgery to twenty-four months post-surgery, WOMAC pain improved 9.3 to 3.6 and physical function improved from 35.4 to 17.1. In univariate analysis (t-test, p< 0.05), males tended to have better function (19.6 vs. 14.7) and reported less pain (4.4 vs. 2.8). No other factors were significant in univariate analysis. None of the a priori factors noted above were independently predictive of patient function at twenty-four months in the multivariate model (F=2.06, p=0.04, R²=0.16). Decreased pain with activity at twenty-four months independently was predicted by having less pain pre surgery (p=0.01), being male (p=0.04) and having fewer comorbidities (p=0.07) in the multi-variate model (F=2.9. p=0.004, R²=0.21).

Funding: This work was supported by a grant from The Arthritis Society

Introduction and Aims: Open femoral fracture is a serious injury. We have asked the question: do open femur fractures in polytrauma patients correlate with higher injury severity scores, increased length of stay and higher mortality rates than in closed femur fracture polytrauma patients.

Method: We undertook a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered trauma database at a Level 1 trauma centre. We identified multiple-injured patients with femur fractures who presented in a 36 month period. The cases were divided into 2 groups; open femur fractures (n=33) and closed femur fractures (n=80). Data was collected on demographics, precipitating event, length of stay spent in the ICU, number of associated injuries, ISS, AIS for affected systems, number of femoral surgeries and disposition. Data was analyzed using parametric statistical tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Our analysis revealed that an average, patients in the open femur fracture group spent 8 + 9 days in ICU, sustained 4 + 1 associated injuries, underwent 2 + 1 femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 13, and died of their injuries in 30.3% of cases. Patients in the closed femur fracture groups spent 8 + 9 days in ICU, sustained 4 + 1 associated injuries, underwent 1 + 1 femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 14, and died of their injuries in 12.5% of cases. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of time spent in ICU, ISS and number of associated injuries. The average number of surgeries was significantly greater in the open femur fracture group (p-value 0.000). A Chi-squared analysis of disposition indicated that patients with femur fractures were more likely to die of their injuries (p-value 0.020).

Conclusions: Findings of the current study demonstrate that while the presence of an open femur fracture does not correlate with an increase in ISS or increase ICU length of stay it may act as a marker for more serious prognosis in polytrauma patients.

Introduction and Aims: To compare the outcomes between primary and revision total hip arthroplasty in patients at one institution with regard to demographics, complication rates and functional outcome. Further study of the problems associated with revision total hip replacement, focused on complication rates, would appear to be warranted.

Method: All patients were entered prospectively in a database and were assessed by means of physical examination, radiographs, SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires. Patients were followed for a minimum of two years with a range of two to five years. Patients were seen on an annual basis.

Results: Five hundred and forty-seven patients underwent primary total hip replacement and 213 patients underwent revision total hip replacement. 53.4% of patients undergoing primary and 52% of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty were female. Mean age at primary hip replacement 61.8 years, revision hip replacement 67.1 years. Post-operative complication rate was 7.6% in primary patients and 14.7% in revision patients (p< .05); there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to intra-operative fracture, implant loosening or post-operative infection; there was a statistically significant difference in terms of dislocation with 0.8% of primary arthroplasties and 5.6% of revision patients sustaining at least one dislocation following their surgery (p< .01). Both groups of patients had a statistically significant improvement between their pre- and post-operative WOMAC and SF-36 physical scores (p< .0001); however, there was also a statistically significant difference in outcome when the two groups were compared with primary patients having significantly improved WOMAC scores (p< .0001) and significantly improved SF-36 physical socres (p< .0001).

Conclusions: Revision hip arthroplasty does not bring to the patient the same degree of benefit as the primary operation. The reason for this is multi-factorial and includes a higher complication rate and lower functional outcome.

Introduction and Aims: Open femoral fracture is a serious injury. We have asked the question: do open femur fractures in polytrauma patients correlate with higher injury severity scores, increased length of stay and higher mortality rates than in closed femur fracture polytrauma patients.

Method: We undertook a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered trauma database at a Level 1 trauma centre. We identified multiple-injured patients with femur fractures who presented in a 36-month period. The cases were divided into two groups: open femur fractures (n=33) and closed femur fractures (n=80). Data was collected on demographics, precipitating event, length of stay spent in the ICU, number of associated injuries, ISS, AIS for affected systems, number of femoral surgeries and disposition. Data was analysed using parametric statistical tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Our analysis revealed that on average, patients in the open femur fracture group spent eight + nine days in ICU, sustained four + one associated injuries, underwent two + one femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 13, and died of their injuries in 30.3% of cases. Patients in the closed femur fracture groups spent eight + nine days in ICU, sustained four + one associated injuries, underwent one + one femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 14, and died of their injuries in 12.5% of cases. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of time spent in ICU, ISS and number of associated injuries. The average number of surgeries was significantly greater in the open femur fracture group (p-value 0.000). A Chi-squared analysis of disposition indicated that patients with femur fractures were more likely to die of their injuries (p-value 0.020).

Conclusions: Findings of the current study demonstrate that while the presence of an open femur fracture does not correlate with an increase in ISS or increase ICU length of stay, it may act as a marker for more serious prognosis in polytrauma patients.

Twelve pairs of fresh-frozen, cadaveric femora were harvested. Each right femur was prepared for the cemented insertion of the femoral component of a total hip implant. Left femora served as matched intact controls. Following insertion of the implants, the distal tip of the stem was identified and an oblique osteotomy was made to represent a periprosthetic fracture. Proximally, plates were secured with cables and distally by bicortical screw fixation (c+s). The twelve pairs of femora were randomly divided into three groups: 1. Zimmer Cable-Ready System, 2. AO 4.5 mm broad, LC-DCP, with Wire Mounts and Double Luque Wires, 3. Dall-Miles Cable Grip System. Specimens were mounted and deforming forces were applied to test the biomechanical stiffness of the constructs. Following testing the plate-cable combinations, the proximal cables were removed and replaced with unicortical screws (s+s). Repeat testing was then performed as per the above protocol.

The stiffness of the constructs relative to intact bone decreased (p< 0.05) with fixation utilising cables plus screws (c+s) during four-point bending (69–77%) and offset rotational loading (61–64%). When testing unicor-tical plus bicortical screw fixation (s+s) in these modes, a similar effect was seen. There was no difference between plate systems (ANOVA, p> 0.05). Comparisons of stiffness between cable plus screw combination versus unicor-tical plus bicortical screw combination revealed that the latter method of fixation (s+s) was more rigid (p< 0.05).

Our study showed that the three plate-cable systems displayed similar biomechanical stiffness. In addition, when the cables were replaced proximally with unicortical screws, more rigid fixation was obtained in all but one plane of testing.

We conclude that the method of plate stabilisation by screws or cables is more significant than the type of plate used for periprosthetic fracture stabilisation.

Two hundred and seventeen consecutive patients (238 hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty using the St Michael’s stem and a non-porous screw ring cup. Patients were followed prospectively clinically using the St Michael’s hip score and radiographically. At an average of 11.9 years (10-13.5 years), 55 patients (59 hips) had died, 23 patients (23 hips) were lost to follow-up. The St Michael’s hip score improved from 13.4 pre-operatively to 21.7 (out of a possible 25) at the latest follow-up. Thirty-seven (24%) of the acetabular components have been revised for aseptic loosening and an additional seven components are radiographically loose. No femoral components have been revised. Using Engh’s criteria one femoral component is definitely loose and two femoral components have stable fibrous ingrowth. Significant stress shielding was noticed in 23 hips (17%) without clinical consequences. Minor osteolysis was seen in 13 hips most commonly around the proximal femur and has not caused symptoms. The St Michael’s stem with its large pore size madreporic surface has comparable results to other porous coated stems with smaller pore size.

The St Michael’s stem provided reliable ingrowth and fixation with an acceptable degree of stress shielding. The non-porous screw ring cup had a high failure rate.

An episode of hypotension is common during cemented joint replacement, and has been associated with circulatory collapse and sudden death. We studied the mechanism of hypotension in two groups of six dogs after simulated bilateral cemented arthroplasty. In one group, with no lavage, the insertion of cement and prosthesis was followed by severe hypotension, elevated pulmonary artery pressure, decreased systemic vascular resistance and a 21% reduction in cardiac output. In the other group, pulsatile intramedullary lavage was performed before the simulated arthroplasties. Hypotension was less, and although systemic vascular resistance decreased, the cardiac output did not change. The severity of the hypotension, the decrease in cardiac output and an increase in prostaglandin metabolites were related to the magnitude of pulmonary fat embolism. Pulsatile lavage prevents much of this fat embolism, and hence the decrease in cardiac output. The relatively mild hypotension after lavage was secondary to transient vasodilation, which may accentuate the hypotension caused by the decreased cardiac output due to a large embolic fat load. We make recommendations for the prevention and management of hypotension during cemented arthroplasty.

The hospital records of 222 cases of ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia were reviewed, and patients were grouped according to the type of fracture and the method of treatment. Thirty-five per cent of patients required late operation for delayed union or non-union, osteomyelitis, refracture and malunion, regardless of the treatment group. A disturbing factor was the 30% incidence of osteomyelitis in patients treated by fixation of both fractures, almost three times the incidence when only one fracture was fixed. A 30% incidence of delayed union or non-union occurred in patients managed conservatively. Of sixty-three patients personally examined, the worst results found were those following conservative management of both fractures. More use of rigid external fixation and of cast bracing is recommended in the management of the fractured tibia, combined with internal fixation of the femoral fracture. Examination of the knee suggested that, with ipsilateral fractures, disruption of ligaments is a common occurrence and should always be suspected.