Abstract
Purpose: In uncemented total hip arthroplasty, stem design is one of the important factors influencing bone remodeling. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in bone remodeling between metaphyseal and diaphyseal fit stems.
Methods: Twenty-three patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (28 hips) with metaphyseal fit stems were matched to 27 patients (32 hips) undergoing uncemented total hip arthroplasty with diaphyseal fit stems. Preoperative radiographs were assessed for canal fill, canal shape, and bone quality. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for frequency and time of appearance of peri-prosthetic bone remodeling including spot welds, cortical hypertrophy and pedestal formation. All patients were examined by a modified Harris Hip Score.
Results: The proximal canal shape and bone quality were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the frequency of spot welds at 1 year and 2 years. Spot welds were mainly located in Gruen zone 1. Cortical hypertrophy was greater (p < 0.05) at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years with the metaphyseal fit stem. Cortical hypertrophy was found only in Gruen zones 3 and 5. Halo pedestal formation was greater (p < 0.05) at 6 months with the metaphyseal fit stem but not at 1 year and 2 years. Calcar rounding was observed in 25 hips (90.0%) with metaphyseal fit stems and twenty hips (62.5%) with diaphyseal fit stems. At the last follow-up, average HHS was similar (90.6 +/− 1.5 / 91.7 +/− 1.7; metaphyseal / diaphyseal fit stems). No patient developed aseptic loosening.
Conclusions: This is the first study to determine differences in bone remodeling between a metaphyseal and a diaphyseal fixed stem in uncemented THA. After one year, the only significant difference between these two groups was cortical hypertrophy, which was greater in patients undergoing metaphyseal fit stem insertion. Both stem designs demonstrated bone remodeling with no differences in spot welds or pedestal formation. At two years, there was no functional difference between these two patient groups. To further elucidate the relation between radiographic and clinical results, longer term follow-up is required.
Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada
