Stoppa approach has recently been adapted for pelvic surgery as it allows direct intra-pelvic reduction and fixation of the quadrilateral plate and anterior column. We report our early experience, indications and complications with this exposure introduced in 2010 in our tertiary unit.

A Retrospective review of all Stoppa approaches in pelvic-acetabular fixations was performed from a prospectively maintained database.

Of the 25 patients, mean age 40 years (range 15–76), who underwent pelvic-acetabular fixation using Stoppa approach, 21 patients had mean follow up of 7.3 months (1–48 months). All except 24% of patients had one or more additional systemic injury some requiring additional surgery. There were 6 acetabular fractures, 13 pelvic ring injuries and 6 combined fractures. Mean injury-surgery interval was 9 days (range 3–20). 8 patients had an isolated Stoppa approach whilst the remaining others also had an additional approach. Mean surgical time was 239 minutes. Anatomical reduction was achieved in 96% (24/25) cases. There was 1 minor intra-operative vascular injury, repaired immediately successfully, and no late wound infections, or other visceral complications. One patient reported new onset sensory numbness which resolved after the first review. Two patients reported erectile dysfunction thought to be caused by the initial injury. One patient had asymptomatic plate loosening. None required revision surgery.

Despite the obvious learning curve, we found this approach safe and it did not compromise accuracy of reduction in well selected patients, but early surgery within 10–14 days is recommended to aid optimal reduction.

The radiological evidence of implant failure following plate fixation of traumatic pubic symphysis diastasis can be up to 75%. We report the complications following symphyseal double orthogonal plating in patients with pubic symphysis diastasis over a period of 2.5 years. Patient records and radiographs of 38 consecutive patients were reviewed with mean follow up of 12.5 months. 5 patients (13%) had radiological evidence of implant failure with one patient (2.6%) requiring revision surgery. There was no evidence of wound complications. We conclude that our lower rate of revision surgery and metal work failure is attributed to double orthogonal plating.

Whiplash injury is surrounded by controversy in both the medical and legal world. The debate on whether it is either a potentially serious medical condition or a social problem is ongoing. This paper briefly examines a selection of studies on low velocity whiplash injury (LVWI) and whiplash associated disorder (WAD) and touches upon the pathophysiological and epidemiological considerations, cultural and geographical differences and the effect of litigation on chronicity. The study concludes that the evidence for significant physical injury after LVWI is poor, and if significant disability is present after such injury, it will have to be explained in terms of psychosocial factors.

Hip replacement is a very successful operation and the outcome is usually excellent. There are recognised complications that seem increasingly to give rise to litigation. This paper briefly examines some common scenarios where litigation may be pursued against hip surgeons. With appropriate record keeping, consenting and surgical care, the claim can be successfully defended if not avoided. We hope this short summary will help to highlight some common pitfalls. There is extensive literature available for detailed study.

Background:

Morbidity of any surgical procedure is undefined. Major surgeries and minor surgeries have different morbidities but the morbidity after any surgical procedure is neither quantified nor defined in literature. Minimally invasive surgeries have evolved in all surgical branches and are known to have less morbidity after the surgery. There is no score or index to assess early recovery after any surgical procedure.

Introduction

The gamma nail is a cephalomedullary implant used in proximal femoral fracture management. Short gamma nails are technically less demanding, but there is concern over potentially higher complication rate.

Background

The current literature tends to suggest that all the different approaches used for Knee Arthroplasty give similar results. The literature also cautions that the MINI quadriceps sparing approaches are to be utilized in very select cases as they are difficult to perform, take longer time, have a greater intra-op complication rate and are associated with a higher number of component malpositioning. Despite these warnings of the literature, the author has been impressed by the physiological nature of the subvastus approach for knee arthrotomy and the author has used this approach exclusively for all Knee arthroplasties in the last 4 years. All primary Knee Arthroplasties have been performed through the mini-subvastus approach, utilizing the principle of a mobile window, irrespective of the degree of pre-operative deformity, obesity, range of motion or previous surgery. All revision Knee Arthroplasties have also been performed through the subvastus approach. All the surgeries have been performed in the private sector in a highly competitive environment with the patient having easy access to various other high volume surgeons performing arthroplasties through a more standard approach.

Background Computer navigation is increasingly being recognized as a valuable tool in restoring the mechanical axis post TKR. Its use is as yet not universal due to the costs involved, its availability and the fact that it can be cumbersome and time consuming to use. Additionally it requires the insertion of Schanz pins in the femur as well as the tibia which can be a matter of concern as regards stress fracture and infection. However, it is able to reliably locate the center of the femoral head which is an elusive landmark in the standard method. The center of the ankle involves registration for the medial and lateral malleoli which are subcutaneous and easily palpable. We decided to navigate only the distal femoral cut with a specialized navigation unit called Articular Surface Mounted navigation which does not require the insertion of additional pins through the femur or the tibia. We purposely did not use navigation for the rest of the bony cuts as all the other landmarks i.e. femoral epicondyles, tibial malleoli, and tuberosity etc are all easily palpable. This dramatically reduced the surgical time and increased its user friendliness. We are presenting our results.

We are presenting a prospective analysis and assessment for the results of the Coflex@ inter-spinous dynamic stabilization device with a 2 year follow up. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the Coflex@ Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Implant.

A prospective analysis was performed on 121 patients (176 devices) treated with the Coflex@ Interspinous Implant. Indication for the treatment was spinal canal foraminal stenosis with nerve root irritation.

Pre- and postoperative disability and pain scores were measured using Oswestry disability score, functional assessment a radiological evaluation at pre-operative - three - six twelve and twenty-four month interval.

Data analysis revealed a high rate of patient satisfaction 92% of patients are satisfied and will have the surgery again 81% of patients had major improvement of their leg symptoms. 72% of patients reported improvement of their back pain symptoms this was more noted in the decompression group.

Two revision surgeries were carried out. One due to implant back-out and the second due to infection.

The Coflex@inter-spinous implant is a simple surgical treatment strategy with a low risk. Early results show a good improvement of both clinical and radiological parameters combined with patient satisfaction with better outcome achieved if combined with spinal decompression.

Obesity has been associated with degenerative osteoarthritis of knee joint The over all incidence of osteoarthritis of the knee is also more in patients with obesity. Increasing obesity leads to faster progression of OA, which is due to increased joint load. Body mass index (BMI), dividing an individual’s weight (in kg) by his or her height (in square meters). BMI: Normal = 18.5 to 24.9, Overweight BMI −25–29.9 Obese=30 to 39.9, Morbidly Obese BMI 40 or Greater. Recent article focused on the thigh girth of obese patients and opined that if thigh girth > 55cms, subvastus approach should not be utilized, as it is difficult to evert the patella. We believed that obesity should not really cause a problem for the patients undergoing a TKA with the mini subvastus approach as the anatomy of the quadriceps in the obese and the non-obese patient population is the same. We decided to evert the patella only after osteotomy of tibia and the femur.

All patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with minisubvastus approach between January 2006 to July 2007 and who were obese (BMI> 30) were included in our study. Out of 425 primary Total knee arthroplasty were performed during this period. Out of these, there were total 97 obese patients with 109 knees which form the part of the study.

There were 81 females and 16 males and 12 patients had staged bilateral knee arthroplasty. The weight varied from 63 to 125 kgs. 91 patients had varus deformity of < 15 degree, 15 patients had varus deformity of > 15 degree, 3 patients had valgus deformity. The thigh girth in obese group (BMI: 30–40) ranged from 45 to 58 cms with average of 50.17. The thigh girth in morbidly obese (BMI > 40) group ranged between 55 to 67 with average of 61.01 cms.

Mini-subvastus approach provided satisfactory exposure in all knees that were operated. In no case was this approach abandoned.

The average surgical time was 90 minutes with range. The average blood loss was 400 cc. The patellar tracking was immaculate in every case and in fact it was difficult to displace patella laterally after 30 degrees of knee flexion. Our 89 patients had flexion of > 120 0,and 20 patients had flexion of > 90 but < 120. The knee society score improved from average 42 (range 17–62) preoperatively to 89 (range 72–95) post operatively. The Knee Society functional score improved from 48 (range 15–60) pre operatively to 65 (range 50–80) post operatively.

Mini subvastus approach offers adequate intraoperative exposure even in obese and morbidly obese patients. It did not result in increased complications in our hands even in morbidly obese patients with higher thigh girth. It is extremely patient friendly and its wider use is recommended.

Introduction: Between June 2005 and September 2007, ten male athletes underwent repair of the pectoralis major tendon using a new double row surgical technique whereby employing three bone anchors to produce a large foot print of the pectoralis major tendon. Here, we present our new surgical technique for the repair of the pectoralis major tendon with the results.

Patients: The mean age was 33.9 years (23–46 years) and the average follow up was 20.3 months (12–39). The mean time between surgery and the original injury was 11.6 weeks (1–48 weeks). We used the visual analogue scale for determining the level of satisfaction with regards to cosmesis and pain. Also, the patients were asked them about their subjective loss of strength.

Results: Eight patients were in pain prior to surgery and all patients were unsatisfied with the appearance of their chest. The average loss of strength was 75% pre-operatively. At the final follow up, none of the patients complained of any pain while pushing things away from their body; nine patients had no pain on moving their arm across the chest whilst one patient reported mild pain. Nine were satisfied with the appearance and the average regain in strength was around 90%. One patient developed a deep infection requiring a further washout and antibiotics. No re-rupture was seen amongst our patients. Hence, we conclude that satisfactory results can be achieved with this new technique.

Introduction: There is paucity in guidance on when and what should be said or who should take the consent for patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty. Never before, the specialists been contacted for current practice and their recommendations on the content and timing of obtaining the consent in these patients.

Materials and Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to 154 Orthopaedic consultants in the 14 units in NorthWestern region of England. We acquired information on their current practice, awareness of the guidelines and their preferences and recommendations.

Results: A total of 117/154 (76%) consultants responded, of which 84 (55%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Currently, 36% patients are consented at preoperative assessment clinic and 40% on admission. 75% of the consultant consent themselves or are consented by their registrars. 70% were aware of local or national policies on who should consent patients and 40% on what should be explained and documented. 75% recommended that operating surgeon should obtain consent. The recommended time for the consent was at preoperative assessment by 57%.

Discussion: If the act of signing the consent form is to be more meaningful it should be signed by the surgeon who is going to perform the operation. This study demonstrates that the consultants agree on the common complications but have a varied threshold for giving the less common risks. With shortening of the waiting time, there is a growing body of surgeons suggesting that the consent should be done at the listing itself.

We report 114 of 117 (97% follow up) consecutive metal-on-metal hip resurfacings in 105 patients with a minimum of 5 years follow up implanted between October 1999 and May 2002. Revision of either the femoral or acetabular component during the study period is defined as failure. No other revisions have been performed or are impending. We had 4 failures giving us survivorship at 5 years of 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94 – 100). The mean follow up was 72 months and the mean age at implantation was 54.5 years old (Range 35 – 75). All patients were followed up clinically and radiographically.

The mean Harris hip score at follow up was 96.4. The mean Oxford Hip Score fell from 41.6 preoperatively (Range 16 – 57) to 15.3 postoperatively (Range 12 – 49) p< 0.0001. The UCLA Activity Scale rose from 3.93 preoperatively (Range 1 – 10) to 7.54 postoperatively (Range 4 – 10) p< 0.001.

Radiographic analysis revealed an average stem shaft angle of 130.6 degrees (Range 112 – 148) with average cup alignment of 36 degrees (Range 22 – 47). Neck thinning was present in 12 hips (10%) and we define a technique for measuring thinning. Heterotropic ossification was present in 17 hips and lucent lines around the femoral component in 10 hips.

This study confirms that metal-on-metal resurfacing produces an excellent clinical and functional outcome in the younger patient who requires surgical intervention for hip disease. The results compare favourably with those from the originating centre and confirm that resurfacing is well suited for younger higher demand patients. It is the first study with a minimum 5 year follow up from outside the originating centre.

Purpose: We report a series of 117 consecutive metal-on-metal Birmingham Hip Resurfacings in 105 patients with a minimum of 5 year follow up.

Method: Patients were followed up both clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 5 years following implantation. Revision of either the femoral or acetabular component during the study period is defined as failure.

Results: We followed up 114 of 117 hips (97%). We had 4 failures giving us survivorship at 5 years of 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94–100). The mean follow up was 72 months and the mean age at implantation 54.5 years old. The mean Oxford Hip Score fell from 41.6 preoperatively to 15.3 postoperatively (p< 0.0001). The mean Harris Hip Score at 5 year follow up was 96.4. The UCLA Activity Scale rose from 3.93 preoperatively to 7.54 postoperatively (p< 0.001). Radiographic analysis revealed neck thinning in 12 patients (10%) and we define a method of measuring this. The average stem shaft angle in our cohort was 130 degrees and the average cup angle was 36 degrees. Heterotropic ossification was present in 17 hips (15%).

Conclusion: This study confirms that metal-on-metal resurfacing produces an excellent clinical and functional outcome in the younger patient who requires surgical intervention for hip disease. The results compare favourably with those from the originating centre and confirm that resurfacing is well suited for younger higher demand patients. It is the first study with a minimum 5 year follow up outside the originating centre.

Introduction: Preliminary results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty were promising. The first series with minimum 5 year follow up was published in 2005 and came from the designing centre. Survivorship and functional results were good. This is the first series with a minimum 5 year follow up not from the designing centre.

Methods: All patients who underwent BHR between the dates of October 1999 and May 2002 were included in the study.

Results: We report 114 of 117 (97% follow up) consecutive metal-on-metal hip resurfacings in 105 patients with a minimum of 5 years follow up. Revision of either the femoral or acetabular component during the study period is defined as failure. We had 4 failures giving a survivorship at 5 years of 96.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 93–100). The mean follow up was 72 months and the mean age at implantation was 54.5 years old (Range 35–75). All patients were followed up clinically and radiographically.

The mean Harris hip score at follow up was 96.4. The mean Oxford Hip Score fell from 41.6 preoperatively (Range 16–57) to 15.3 postoperatively (Range 12–49) p< 0.0001. The UCLA Activity Scale rose from 3.93 preoperatively (Range 1–10) to 7.54 postoperatively (Range 4–10) p< 0.001.

Radiographic analysis revealed an average stem shaft angle of 130.6 degrees (Range 112–148) with average cup alignment of 36 degrees (Range 22–47). Neck thinning was present in 16 hips (14%) and we define a technique for measuring thinning.

Discussion: This study confirms that metal-on-metal resurfacing produces an excellent clinical and functional outcome in the younger patient who requires surgical intervention for hip disease. The results compare favourably with those from the originating centre and confirm that resurfacing is well suited for younger higher demand patients.

Aim: To determine whether operator’s experience and time of operation (MUA) affects the outcome of fractures in paediatric age group as measured by re-MUA rate.

Method: Retrospective analysis of 918 children with fractures requiring MUA over a period of eight years was carried out.

Results: Re-MUA rate for those 910 children was 9.8%(90). There was a significant difference in these fractures requiring re-MUA depending upon the operator’s experience and time. Amongst all (90) who required re-MUA 7(7.7%) had index surgery by consultants and 83(93.3%) had MUA by trainee surgeons. 23(17.4%) patients were operated between 9 to 1700 hours and rest of them had MUA after 1700 hours (82.6%). At repeat procedure 4(4.4%) required some sort of fixation. (K wiring or ORIF)

Conclusion: The current overall re-MUA rate is higher than data published from the specialised centres and surgeons, but is probably more representative of norm, when performed in a general setting. Exact fracture personality should be evaluated carefully to reduce re-MUA rate. Re-MUA rate for trainee needs to be improved.

Delays in the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures often results in extensile or combined approaches being required. This study reports the outcome from a regional centre aiming to treat these fractures via a single surgical approach where possible.

Seventy-two patients (73 displaced acetabular fractures) with an average age of 39.5 years (range 15–76 years) were studied with an average follow up period of 45.5 months (range 24–96). All radiographs were reviewed together with a full clinical assessment of each patient including the Harris Hip Score.

Thirty-four fractures were simple and 39 were complex including 27 both column fractures. Eight were noted to have an associated injury to the femoral head. The average time from injury to surgery was 11.7 days (range 1–35 days) with 80 percent of cases being operated on within two weeks after injury.

In 67 fractures (92%), including 24 both column fractures, a single approach alone was used (Anterior Ilioin-guinal 26 cases; Posterior Kocher-Langenbeck 41 cases). Five fractures needed an extensile triradiate approach and only one case required a combined anterior and posterior approach. A congruent reduction (gap or step of 2mm or less) was achieved in 65 cases (89%). Functional outcome was good with an average Harris Hip Score of 85 (range 20–100). There were 2 cases of deep infection (2.7%) and 4 patients (5.5%) required later hip replacement. There were no cases of venous thrombosis. Twenty cases exhibited heterotopic ossification of varying degree but none of these were grade IV.

Conclusion: In most cases, internal fixation of a displaced acetabular fractures is possible via a single surgical approach. Morbidity and complications are much reduced but single approach surgery requires that patients are assessed and treated early and prompt referral to a specialist unit is recommended.

The Phantom based Computer assisted orthopaedic surgical system (CAOSS) has been developed collaboratively by the University of Hull and the Hull Royal Infirmary, to assist in operations like dynamic hip screw fixation. Here we present summary of our system.

CAOSS comprises a personal computer based computer system, a frame grabber with video feed from a C-arm image intensifier, an optical tracking system and a radiolucent registration phantom which consists of an H arrangement of 21 metal balls. The phantom is held in position by the optically tracked end-effector. Knowing the optical position of the phantom, a registration algorithm calculates the position of C-arm in coordinate space of the optical tracking system.

Computer based planning uses an anteroposterior (AP) and lateral image of the fracture. Marks are placed on the 2D projections of femoral shaft, neck and head on the computer screen, which are then used to create 3D surgical plan. The computer then plans a trajectory for the guide wire of DHS. The depth of the drill hole is also calculated. The trajectory is then shown on both AP and lateral images on the screen.

CAOSS meets all the requisite of electrical and electromagnetic radiation standards for medical equipment. There has been extensive validation using software simulation, performance evaluation of system components, extensive laboratory trials on plastic bones. The positional accuracy was shown to be within 0.7mm and angular accuracy to be within 0.2°. The system was also validated using Coordinate Measurement Machine.

Our system has the unique feature of the registration phantom which provides accurate registration of the fluoroscopic image.

Though the perceived advantages of computer assisted orthopaedic systems (CAOS) have been claimed incessantly over the years, these systems are far from commonplace in most orthopaedic theatres. Here, we present a summary of those very reasons.

Health Technology Assessment report elicited no proof of clinical benefits of the Robodoc over conventional procedures. Mazoochian et al were unable to confirm the same accuracy of implant position while using the Caspar. Honl et al found a higher revision and dislocation rate accompanied with longer surgery durations when robotic assisted technology was used.

Shortcomings identified in the CT-based navigation systems included an additional CT scan, which represents extra costs for the acquisition as well as additional radiation to the patient. Sistan et al claims that image-free navigational systems in knee arthroplasty do not provide a more reliable means for rotational alignment as compared to traditional techniques. Computer assisted pedicle screw insertion in the spine has also not demonstrated any significant clinical advantages.

To date, long term results of computer-guided or robot-assisted implantation of endoprosthetic devices are still lacking. With the unproven long-term clinical and functional results of patients who had computer aided surgery and given the multi-factorial complexities of patient outcome, it is difficult to claim via small scale short term studies that these systems present a significant benefit to the patient or the healthcare providers. Potential benefits of long-term outcome, better implant survival and functional improvement require further investigation and until that information is available this technology must be further developed before its widespread usage can be justified.

Substantial bone loss and bone defects are the most challenging problems faced by the surgeon performing revision surgery. Of the many techniques available, impaction bone grafting aims to achieve stability of an implant with the use of compacted, morselized bone graft and subsequently allows restoration of bone stock by bone ingrowth. This technique was proposed with a highly polished double tapered stem. This technique has also been subsequently used with stems of varying surface finish and shape. We report here our experience with impaction grafting using Charnley stem and variants with 8–10 year results assessing the radiological appearance and subsequent behaviour of the impacted allograft.

A prospective radiological study of revision hip arthroplasty done for aseptic loosening with femoral bone loss is presented. Pre operative bone loss was assessed using the Endo Klinik grading system. Impaction grafting with fresh frozen femoral head allograft and the flanged 40 size Charnley stem was used in 17 cases and extra heavey flanged 40 size was used in 9 casaes. Post operative and annual review radiographs were examined for graft distribution, graft consolidation, cortical repair and subsidence of the stem.

Twenty six revisions performed in 25 patients between May 1994 and November 1996 were followed up for 8–10 years. Mean age was 66 years(range 26–83 years). There were eighteen male and 7 female patients. One patient died 2 years and 9 months after the operation. Pre operatively Endo Klinik grade 2 bone loss was seen in 7 cases and grade 3 bone loss was seen in 19 cases. Post operative radiographs showed even graft distribution in twenty cases, five patients had poor filling in Gruen zone 3 and one patient had poor filling in zone 2. All cases demonstrated evidence of graft consolidation by one year. Twenty two cases showed no further changes after 8–10 years. Two cases of subsidence have been revised and one patient is awaiting revision ( 8 years after revision). Two of these were extra heavy flanged 40 stems. Three cases showed subsidence > 5mm and were associated with graft deficiency in zone 2 or 3. Out of these three one had an extra heavy flanged 40 stem inserted. There were no medical complications or deep infection following surgery in these patients. One patient had dislocation.

In conclusion, femoral revision using impaction grafting with the Charnley stem produces satisfactory radiological results in the medium to long term. Good graft distribution on a postoperative radiograph is associated with graft consolidation, cortical repair and minimal stem subsidence. Extra heavy flanged 40 stems perform less satisfactorily compared to the flanged 40 stems. Inadequate graft filling is associated with stem subsidence and revision. These findings highlight the importance of meticulous surgical technique to ensure even graft distribution. This study supports the taper of the Charnley stem and suggests that a vaquasheen finish is not contraindicated.