Abstract
Background Computer navigation is increasingly being recognized as a valuable tool in restoring the mechanical axis post TKR. Its use is as yet not universal due to the costs involved, its availability and the fact that it can be cumbersome and time consuming to use. Additionally it requires the insertion of Schanz pins in the femur as well as the tibia which can be a matter of concern as regards stress fracture and infection. However, it is able to reliably locate the center of the femoral head which is an elusive landmark in the standard method. The center of the ankle involves registration for the medial and lateral malleoli which are subcutaneous and easily palpable. We decided to navigate only the distal femoral cut with a specialized navigation unit called Articular Surface Mounted navigation which does not require the insertion of additional pins through the femur or the tibia. We purposely did not use navigation for the rest of the bony cuts as all the other landmarks i.e. femoral epicondyles, tibial malleoli, and tuberosity etc are all easily palpable. This dramatically reduced the surgical time and increased its user friendliness. We are presenting our results.
Aim
To analyse the radiographic results obtained with selective femoral navigation and compare with
standard navigational results from the literature
Non-navigated Knees form personal series.
Materials and Methods
We have utilized the ASM navigation for distal femoral cut in 112 knees and obtained long X-rays (scanograms) and routine knee X-rays (AP, Lateral and skyline) to study the mechanical axis and component positioning. We measured the mechanical axis deviation, femoral and tibial angle on AP and lateral films and patellar tilt or subluxation on post-operative X-rays by a digital imaging programme called Image–J. (As suggested by the Knee Society roentgenographic Score). We have compared our results with other navigated series from literature and our own series of non-navigated knees. (113 knees) We also noted the surgical time to perform the operation and the occurrence of any complications.
Results
Selective femoral navigation is able to restore the mechanical axis as reliably as other methods of navigation and more reliably than non-navigated knees. On an average, it adds less than 10 minutes to surgical time. Femoral angle, tibial angle patellar tilt and subluxation are similar in both navigated and non-navigated series. Navigation use was not associated with any increased complications and no complication could be ascribed to its use. Selective femoral navigation reduced the outliers in mechanical axis restoration when compared with standard femoral intrameduallry instrumentation.
Discussion
Selective distal femoral navigation is a reliable tool in restoring mechanical axis post TKR. It is particularly valuable in knees that have pronounced femoral bowing.
