Introduction: The development of Inflammatory Pseudotumour (IP) is a recognised complication following Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA), thought to occur secondary to wear and elevated ion levels. Studies have shown that acetabular component orientation influences the wear of metal-on-metal hip replacement bearings. The aims of this study were to investigate the significance of cup orientation in the development of IP, and to identify a ‘safe-zone’ for cup placement with lower-risk for IP development.

Methods: Twenty six patients (n=27 hips) with IP confirmed radiologically, intra-operatively and histologically were matched for sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, component size and follow-up with a cohort of asymptomatic MoMHRA patients (Control n=58). Radiographic acetabular anteversion and inclination were measured using EBRA. We calculated the distance in degree space of each acetabular component from the optimum position of 40° inclination and 20° anteversion, recommended by the designers, and thus compared acetabular component position between the two groups. Three different zones were tested as possibly optimum for acetabular placement. These were Lewinneck’s Zone (LZ) (inclination/anteversion; 30–50°/5–25°), and two zones defined by ±5° (Zone 1) or ± 10° (Zone 2) about the suggested target of 40°/20°. An optimal placement zone was determined based on a significant difference in IP incidence between components in the zone versus those outside.

Results: There was a wide range in cup orientations; mean inclination and anteversion were similar in the two groups: IP 47.5° (10.1°–80.6°)/14.1° (4.1°–33.6°) Vs Control 46.1° (28.8°–59.8°)/15.6° (4.3°–32.9°). Acetabular components in the IP group were significantly further away from the optimum position of 40°/20° in comparison to the controls (p=0.023). There was no difference in IP incidence between cups positioned within (IP:13/27, Control:35/58) or out of LZ (p=0.09) and within (IP: 2/27, Control: 10/58) or out of Zone 1 (p=0.156). Cups placed in Zone 2 (IP:6/27, Control:27/58) had significantly lower IP incidence versus those outside this zone (p=0.01). The odd’s ratio of developing IP when the cup is positioned out-of Zone 2 was 3.7.

Discussion: This study highlights the importance of ace-tabular component orientation in IP development. On the whole, patients with pseudotumour had acetabular components that were further away from the optimum position in comparison to the controls. However, a small number of IP patients had well-placed components implying that additional factors, possibly patient and/or gender specific, are involved in the development of pseudotumour. Furthermore, we defined an optimum, ‘safe-zone’ of ±10° around the cup position of 40°/20°. Patients with acetabular components outside this safe zone have an increased risk of IP development.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity as an alternative to THR for younger patients with osteoarthritis. A growing concern has been the association of MoMHRA with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours (IP), especially in women. These have been linked to metal-on-metal wear, which can be related to metal ion concentrations. Elevated metal wear debris levels may result from impingement, rim contact and edge loading. Head-neck ratio (HNR) is a predetermining factor for range of movement and impingement. Neck thinning is a recognised phenomenon post-MoMHRA and we have found an association of IP with increased neck thinning based on a case control study. Our aims were to identify HNR changes a hip undergoes when resurfaced and at follow up; and whether greater neck thinning at follow-up could be associated with the presence of elevated metal ions.

Methods: A cohort of 91 patients (57M:34F) with unilateral MoMHRAs were included in this study. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years (range 1.7–7 years) and serum (Co:Cr) ion levels were measured (ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. For all patients, head-neck ratio (HNR) was measured on plain anterio-posterior pelvic radiographs pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively and at follow-up.

Results: Female patients had significantly bigger HNR pre-op (mean=1.35, range:1.22–1.64) compared to males(mean=1.22, range:1.05–1.38) (p< 0.01). Immediately post-op, female HNRs (mean: 1.26, range: 1.14–1.34) were not different to male patients(mean=1.24, range=1.11–1.38) (p=0.11). At follow-up HNR was once again significantly bigger (p< 0.01) in females (mean=1.35, range: 1.21–1.49), compare to males (mean=1.27, range:1.11–1.38). HNR alterations with operation (p=0.00) and at follow-up (p< 0.01) were significantly bigger in female patients. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between high ion levels and HNR change at follow-up for both Co (p=0.02) and Cr (p< 0.01).

Conclusion: This study identified gender-specific changes in HNR that resurfaced hips undergo, not previously documented. Female hips have greater HNR pre-operatively, compared to male hips, and appear to be biomechanically disadvantaged when resurfaced. A decrease in HNR with resurfacing could result in impingement and lead to processes, known to be more prevalent in females, such as neck thinning, increased wear and IP development. In addition, we highlight a correlation between high ion levels and greater neck thinning at follow-up. Increased neck thinning in symptomatic MoMHRA hips could be secondary to increased wear and should be investigated further radiologically for the presence of IP.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity as an alternative to THR for younger patients with osteoarthritis. A growing concern has been the association of MoMHRA with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours (IP), especially in women. These have been linked to metal-on-metal wear, which can be related to metal ion concentrations. Although cup orientation has been shown to influence wear, the optimum cup position has not been clearly defined. We have identified an optimal cup orientation to minimise IP risk, based on a case controlled study, for inclination/anteversion within ±10° of 40°/20°. Our aim was to see if this optimal position results in lower metal ions, and to identify the boundary of an optimal placement zone for low wear.

Methods: A cohort of 104 patients (60M: 44F) with unilateral MoMHRA was included in this study. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years (range 1.7–7 years) and serum Co and Cr ion levels were measured (ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. Radiographic cup inclination and anteversion were measured using EBRA. The differences in ion levels between different cup orientation zones were investigated. Three orientation zones were defined centered on the target orientation of 40°/20°: Z1 within ±5°, Z2 outside ±5°/within ±10° and Z3: within ±10°.

Results: There was a wide range of cup placements; mean inclination/anteversion were 46.3°(21.5°–64.6°)/15°(2.7°–35.6°). Cr levels, but not Co, were higher in female patients (p=0.002) and those with small femoral components (< 50mm, p =0.03).

For the whole cohort, there was no significant difference in ion levels (Cr: p=0.092. Co=0.075) between cups positioned within Z3 (n=58) versus those outside (n=46 mean). Male patients with cups within Z3 (n=27) had lower ion levels in comparison to those outside Z3, which were significantly lower for Co (p=0.049) but not Cr (p=0.084). Female patients had similar levels within and out of Z3 for both ions (Cr: p=0.83, Co: p=0.84). However, patients with cups within Z1 (n=13) had significantly lower Co (p=0.005) and Cr (p=0.001) than those outside Z1 (n=95). Interestingly, Co levels were significantly lower in Z1 (n=13) in comparison to Z2 (n=33) (p=0.048) but Cr levels were not different (p=0.06).

Discussion: MoMHRA cups placed with ±5° of the ideal position of 40°/20°gave rise to significantly lower metal ions indicating lower wear within this narrow zone, in both sexes. This safe zone, could be extended to ±10° for male patients only. Gender specific factors, such as pelvic anatomy and joint flexibility, could be responsible for the narrower ‘safe’ zone seen in females. The narrower safe zone coupled with smaller components implanted are factors contributing to higher ion levels and hence the increased incidence of IP seen in females.

Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) can predict long-term outcome of prostheses by measuring migration over time. The Exeter femoral stem is a double-tapered highly polished implant and has been shown to subside within the cement mantle in 2 year RSA studies. It has a proven track record in terms of long-term survivorship and low revision rates. Several studies have demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes following its implantation but this is the first study to assess stem migration at 10 years, using RSA.

This is a single-centre study involving 20 patients (mean age: 63 years, SD=7) undergoing primary total hip replacement for degenerative osteoarthritis using the lateral (Hardinge) approach. RSA radiographs were taken with the patient bearing full weight post-operatively, at 3, 6, 12 months and at 2, 5 and 10 years follow-up. The three-dimensional migration of the Exeter femoral stem was determined.

The mean Oxford Hip Score at 10 years was 43.4 (SD=4.6) and there were no revisions. The stems subsided and rotated internally during a 10-year period. The mean migrations of the head and tip of the femoral stem in all three anatomic directions (antero-posterior, medio-lateral & supero-distal) were 0.69 mm posterior, 0.04 mm lateral and 1.67 mm distal for the head and 0.20 mm anterior, 0.02 mm lateral and 1.23 mm distal for the tip. The total migration at 10 years was 1.81 mm for the head and 1.25 mm for the tip.

The Exeter femoral stem exhibits migration which is a complex combination of translation and rotation in three dimensions. Comparing our 10 year with our previous 2 year migration results, the Exeter stems show continued, but slow distal migration and internal rotation. The subsidence continues to compress the cement and bone-cement interface which maintains secure fixation in the long term.

Introduction: Symptomatic abnormal soft-tissue masses relating to the hip joint, such as those described as pseudotumours, are being increasingly reported following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA). These were found to be locally destructive, requiring revision surgery in a high proportion (75%) of patients. Lymphocyte infiltrations seen in pseudotumours were similar to aseptic lymphocyte vascular associated lesion (ALVAL), which is thought to represent a T-lymphocyte-mediated delayed type hypersensitivity. Therefore, a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr) or cobalt (Co) has been suggested to play a role in pseudotumour aetiology. In patients with bilateral MoMHRA who presented with symptoms on one side, subsequent scans have demonstrated pseudotumours both on the symptomatic and asymptomatic side. Thus, there are concerns that there may be an appreciable number of asymptomatic pseudotumours that surgeons are unaware of and these may eventually become symptomatic.

Aim: The aims of this study were:

to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic pseudotumours after MoMHRA; and

Methods: A total of 201 MoMHRA implanted hips in 158 patients (97 male, 61 female) with a mean age of 56 years (range 33–73 years) were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 61 months (range 13–88 months). Resurfacing devices implanted included 128 Birmingham Hip Resurfacing, 66 Conserve Plus and seven ReCap. The control groups included additional 20 patients, 10 male and 10 female (a mean age 68 years, range 57–80 years) with metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty and a further 22 age-matched patients (a mean age 55 years) without any metal implants. Ultrasound was used as the initial imaging modality and MRI was used to assess the extent of the identified masses. Patients with a soft-tissue mass had ultrasound-guided aspiration or core biopsy performed. Venous blood samples were collected in all patients for serum cobalt and chromium ion levels analysis using Inductively-Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT). The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was used to measure the functional outcomes of patients. Acetabular component abduction angle was measured from standardised anteroposterior pelvis radiographs.

Results: Prevalence – Pseudotumours were found in 7 patients (6 female and 1 male). The overall prevalence of asymptomatic pseudotumours was 4%, with a relatively very high (30%) prevalence in females with bilateral implants. Histological examinations showed extensive necrosis of connective tissue, in which there were scattered aggregates of metal particles and a diffuse lymphocyte infiltrate.

Metal Ion Levels – The presence of pseudotumour was associated with significantly higher median serum cobalt levels (9.2mg/L vs. 1.9mg/L, p< 0.001), chromium levels (12.0mg/L vs. 2.1mg/L, p< 0.001), hip aspirate cobalt levels (1182 mg/L vs. 86.2mg/L, p=0.003), and aspirate chromium levels (883mg/L vs. 114.8mg/ L, p=0.006), as well as with inferior functional scores (OHS 41 vs. 47 p< 0.001). There was no significant difference in acetabular cup inclination angle (p=0.51). Lymphocyte Reactivity: A higher incidence and level of enhanced lymphocyte reactivity to Ni (p=0.001), but not to Co or Cr (the principal elements in the CoCr alloy used in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants), was found in patients with MoMHRA compared to the patients without MoM implants. However, lymphocyte reactivity to Co, Cr and Ni did not significantly differ in patients with pseudotumours compared to those patients without pseudotumours.

Conclusion: The prevalence of asymptomatic pseudotumours in females was high, especially in females with bilateral MoMHRA implants (30%). The patients with ‘asymptomatic’ pseudotumours were in fact mildly symptomatic. Lymphocyte reactivity to Co, Cr and Ni did not differ in patients with pseudotumour compared to those patients without pseudotumours, suggesting that systemic hypersensitivity type IV reactions, mediated by lymphocyte reactivity to these metals, is not the dominant mechanism in pathogenesis of the soft tissue pseudotumours. Furthermore, pseudotumours were not detected in those patients who had normal levels of cobalt and chromium ions. This suggests that pseudotumours do not occur if MoM articulations are well functioning. Therefore, pseudotumours are likely to be a biological consequence of the large amount of metal debris generated in vivo due to excessive wear.

Recently, a series of locally destructive soft tissue pseudotumour has been reported in patients following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA), requiring revision surgery in a high percentage of patients. Based on the histological evidence of lymphocytic infiltration, a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr) or cobalt (Co) has been suggested to play a role in its aetiology. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and level of hypersensitivity reaction to metals in patients with pseudotumour.

Materials and Methods: 25 patients were investigated in this Ethics approved study:

Group 1: MoMHRA patients with pseudotumours, detected on the ultrasound and confirmed with MRI (n=6, 5 F:1 M, mean age 53 years);

Lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT) were used to measure lymphocyte proliferation responses to metals. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from heparinized blood samples using standard Ficoll–Hypaque® (Pharmacia). The PBMC were cultured at a cell density of 106 cells/mL. Culture was set up in the presence of either:

medium alone;

After 5 days of culture, cells were pulsed with [3H]-thymidine and proliferation was assessed by scintillation counting. The stimulation index (SI) was calculated by the ratio of mean counts per minute of stimulated to unstimulated cultures. A SI value of greater than 2.0 was interpreted as a positive result.

Results: A clinical history of metal allergy was reported in 2/6 in Group 1, 2/13 in Group 2, and none in Group 3. In pseudotumour group, the incidence of reactivity to Ni, Co and Cr was 60%, 17% and 0%, respectively. Within Group 2, the reactivity to Ni, Co and Cr was 69%, 8% and 15%, respectively. One control subject had reactivity to Ni. Inter-group comparisons of mean SI values (Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance) showed no significant differences (p> 0.05).

Discussion: The incidence of enhanced lymphocyte response to metals in patients with MoMHRA was more common than the control group. However, in comparison with non-pseudotumour patients, there was no significant difference in the incidence or the level of lymphocyte reactivity in patients with pseudotumour. We conclude that patients with MoMHRA have an enhanced lymphocyte response to metal ions, reflecting exposure and immune reactivity. However, patients with pseudotumours have a similar proliferative response to those without pseudotumours, which suggests that type IV hypersensitivity may not be the cause of the pseudotumours.

Tribological studies of hip arthroplasty suggest that larger diameter metal-on-metal (MOM) articulations would produce less wear than smaller diameter articulations. Other advantages using these large femoral heads implants include better stability with lower dislocation rates and improved range of motion. The aim of the present study was to compare chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co) and titanium (Ti) ion concentrations up to 1-year after implantation of different large diameter MOM total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: Cr, Co and Ti concentrations were measured using a high resolution mass spectrometer (HR-ICP-MS) by an independent laboratory in 110 patients, randomized to receive a large metal-on-metal articulation unce-mented Ti THA from one of the following companies: Zimmer, Smith & Nephew, Biomet or Depuy. Samples of whole blood were collected pre-operatively, and postoperatively at six months and one year.

Summary of Results: At 6 months, whole blood cobalt levels were: (table removed)

Statistical group comparison revealed significant difference for Cr (p=0.006), Co (p=0.047) and Ti (p=< 0.001). With Biomet implants presenting the best results for Cr and Co and Zimmer the highest Ti level.

Discussion: Different implant factors may influence measured metal ion level in whole blood: articular surface wear and implant passive corrosion. Bearing wear may be related to its diameter, quality of the surface finish, component sphericity, radial clearance, manufacturing process (forged vs cast metal) and metal carbon content. Biomet articulation seems to present the best factors selection. Passive corrosion of exposed metallic surfaces is represented by the elevated Ti levels found in all tested systems (Ti was not part of the bearing surfaces). The plasma sprayed acetabular component surface of the Zimmer’s component seems to be responsible for the significant difference in Ti versus the other implants.

Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity due to its perceived advantages of bone conservation and relative ease of revision to a conventional THR if it fails. Known MoMHRA-associated complications include femoral neck fracture, avascular necrosis/collapse of the femoral head/neck, aseptic loosening and soft tissue responses such as ALVAL and pseudotumours. This study’s aim was to assess the functional outcome of failed MoMHRA revised to THR and compare it with a matched cohort of primary THRs.

Method: We have revised 53 MoMHRA cases to THR; the reasons for revision were femoral neck fracture (Fracture Group, n=21), soft tissue reaction (Pseudotumour Group, n=16) and other causes (Other Group, n=16: loosening, AVN and infection). Average followup was 2.9 years. These MoMHRA revisions were compared with 103 matched controls from a primary THR cohort; matched for age, gender and length of followup. We compared, using the MannWhitney U test, operative time (OT, measured in minutes), and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) between the revised MoMHRA groups and their individual controls. We also compared, using the Kruskal Wallis test, UCLA Activity Score in the revised MoMHRA groups.

Results: There were no differences between the Fracture Group (mean OT 99.6, SD: 30.4; mean OHS 19.8, SD:9.2) and its controls (mean OT 95.9, SD: 31.8; mean OHS 17.3, SD: 7.5) nor between the Other Group (mean OT 129.4, SD: 36.7; mean OHS 22.2, SD: 9.4) and its controls (mean OT 104.4, SD: 39.2; mean OHS 20.3, SD: 10.1) in terms of OT and OHS. The Pseudotumour Group had significantly longer OT (mean 161.6, SD: 24.5, p< 0.001) and worse outcome (mean OHS 39.1, SD: 9.3, p< 0.001) than its controls (mean OT 113.1, SD: 51.7; mean OHS 20.0, SD: 9.2). In the Fracture Group, there were 3 infections requiring revisions. For the Pseudotumour Group, there were 3 recurrent dislocations, 1 femoral artery stenosis and 3 femoral nerve palsies. In the Other Group, there were 2 periprosthetic fractures. There was significant difference (p< 0.001) in UCLA scores between the MoMHRA groups. The Pseudotumour Group had the lowest mean UCLA score of 3.8 (SD: 1.89). The Fracture Group (mean: 7.0, S.D. 2.0) and the Other Group (mean: 6.7, S.D. 2.1) had similar UCLA scores.

Discussion: The results demonstrate that outcome after revision of MoMHRA is dependent upon the indication for revision. Patients revised for soft tissue reactions had significantly worse outcome. Patients with soft tissue reactions are more likely to experience complications and require further surgical intervention. The pseudotumour associated revisions were associated with a significantly prolonged OT. The overall complication rate for the study groups was quite high, with 11 (21%) revised MoMHRA cases experiencing a complication. The Pseudotumour Group had a higher complication rate (37%).

Pseudotumours are a rare complication of hip resurfacing. They are thought to be a response to metal debris which may be caused by edge loading due to poor orientation of the acetabular component. Our aim was to determine the optimal acetabular orientation to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation.

We matched 31 hip resurfacings revised for pseudotumour formation with 58 controls who had a satisfactory outcome from this procedure. The radiographic inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular component were measured on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse software. The mean inclination angle (47°, 10° to 81°) and anteversion angle (14°, 4° to 34°) of the pseudotumour cases were the same (p = 0.8, p = 0.2) as the controls, 46° (29° to 60°) and 16° (4° to 30°) respectively, but the variation was greater. Assuming an accuracy of implantation of ± 10° about a target position, the optimal radiographic position was found to be approximately 45° of inclination and 20° of anteversion. The incidence of pseudotumours inside the zone was four times lower (p = 0.007) than outside the zone.

In order to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation we recommend that surgeons implant the acetabular component at an inclination of 45° (± 10) and anteversion of 20° (± 10) on post-operative radiographs. Because of differences between the radiographic and the operative angles, this may be best achieved by aiming for an inclination of 40° and an anteversion of 25°.

Introduction: Metal on metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity due to its perceived advantages of bone conservation and relative ease of revision to a conventional THR if it fails. This retrospective study is aimed at assessing the functional outcome of failed MoMHRA revised to THR and comparing it with a matched cohort of primary THRs.

Method: Since 1999 we have revised 53 MoMHRA to THR. The reasons for revision were femoral neck fracture (Group A, n=21), pseudotumour (Group B, n=16) and other causes (Group C, n=16: loosening, avascular necrosis and infection). Average follow-up was 3 years months (1.2–7.3). These revisions were compared with 106 primary THRs which were age, gender and follow-up matched with the revision group in a ratio of 2:1.

Results: The mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 20.1 (12–51) for group A, 39.1 (14– 56) for group B, 22.8 (12–39) for group C and 17.8 (12–45) for primary THR group. In group A, there were three infections requiring further revisions. In group B, there were three recurrent dislocations, three patients with femoral nerve palsy and one femoral artery stenosis. In group C, there were no complications. The differences in clinical and functional outcome between group B and the remaining groups as well as the difference in the outcome between group B and control group were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: THR for failed MoMHRA was associated with significantly more complications, operation time and need for blood transfusion for the pseudotumour group. In addition, the revisions secondary to pseudotumour also had significantly worse functional outcome when compared to other MoMHRA revisions or primary THR.

Introduction: Despite the satisfactory short-term implant survivorship of MoM hip resurfacing arthroplasty, symptomatic abnormal periprosthetic soft-tissue masses relating to the hip joint, ‘pseudotumours’, are being increasingly reported. These were found be locally destructive, requiring revision surgery in 75% of patients. Asymptomatic pseudotumours have not been previously investigated.

Methods: The aims were: (1) to investigate the prevalence of asymptomatic pseudotumours; and (2) to investigate their potential association with the level of metal ions. A total of 160 hips in 123 patients with a mean age 56 years (range 33–73) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 61 months (range 13–88). Radiographs and OHS were assessed. Patients with a cystic or solid mass detected on the ultrasound/MRI had an aspiration or biopsy performed. Cobalt and chromium levels were analysed using Inductively-Coupled Plasma Spectrometer.

Results: Pseudotumours were found in 6 patients (5F: 1M). In 80% of bilateral cases, it was found in both sides. Histological examination showed extensive necrosis and diffuse lymphocyte infiltration. The presence of pseudotumour was associated with higher serum cobalt (9.2 μg/L vs. 1.9μg/L, p< 0.001) and chromium levels (12.0μg/L vs. 2.1μg/L, p< 0.001); higher hip aspirate cobalt (1182 μg/L vs. 86.2μg/L, p=0.003) and chromium levels (883μg/L vs. 114.8μg/L, p=0.006); and with inferior OHS (23 vs. 14 p=0.08).

Discussion: The prevalence of asymptomatic pseudotumour (5%) was higher than previously reported for the symptomatic pseudotumours (1%). There was a sixfold elevation of serum and a twelve-fold elevation of hip aspirate levels of cobalt and chromium in patients with pseudotumours. This suggests that pseudotumours may be a biological consequence of the large amount of metal debris generated in vivo. The association between pseudotumour and elevated metal ion levels might theoretically be explained by either systemic hypersensitivity responses to metal ions or local cytotoxic effects due to a high level of metal ions.

Introduction: We report on a group of 20 metal-onmetal resurfaced hips (17 patients) presenting with a soft tissue mass associated with various symptoms; these masses we termed pseudotumours.

Methods: All patients underwent plane radiography; CT, MRI and ultrasound investigations were also performed for some patients. Where samples were available histology was performed. Metal ion levels were measured in six patients and one patient had the metal ion levels in the joint fluid measured.

Results: All patients in this series were female. Presentation was variable; the most common symptom was pain or discomfort in the hip region. Other symptoms included spontaneous dislocation, nerve palsy, a noticeable mass or a rash. In all cases a soft tissue mass was present in the region of the hip, this was either solid or cystic. The common histological features were extensive necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration. The blood cobalt and chromium levels varied considerably between the six patients that had these measurements. The median blood chromium level was 3.8 μg/L (range 0.8 to 23 μg/L) and that for cobalt was 11.5 μg/L (range 2.1 to 15 μg/L). The synovial fluid sample taken from a single joint contained much higher metal levels, 701 μg/L for chromium and 329 μg/L for cobalt. Twelve of the 20 cases have so far required revision to a conventional hip replacement.

Discussion: This complication is best imaged with ultrasound, and is not detected by normal xray. We estimate that about 1% of patients develop a pseudotumour in the first five postoperative years. The cause of these pseudotumours is unknown and is probably multifactorial, further work is required to define this; they may be manifestations of a metal sensitivity response. We are concerned that with time the incidence of these pseudo-tumours will increase.

Introduction: Although resurfacing hip replacements are widely used there are few little independent outcome data to support this. The aim of this study was to report the 5 year clinical outcome and 7 year survival of an independent series.

Method: 610 Birmingham hip resurfacings were implanted in 532 patients with an average age of 51.8 years (range 16.5–81.6 years) and were followed for between 2 to 8 years; 120 of this series had minimum five year follow-up. Two patients were lost. There were 23 revisions, giving an overall survival of 95% (95% CI 85–99%) at seven years. Fractured neck of femur (n=13) was the most common reason for revision, followed by aseptic loosening (n=4). There were also 3 patients who had failures that were possibly related to metal debris. At a minimum of 5 year follow-up 93% had excellent or good outcome according to the Harris Hip Score. The mean Oxford Hip Score was 16.1 points (SD 7.7) and the mean UCLA activity score was 6.6 points (SD 1.9). There were no patients with definite evidence of radiographic loosening or greater than 10% of neck narrowing.

Discussion: The results demonstrate that with the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing, implanted using the extended posterior approach, the five year survival is similar or better to the reported survival rates for cemented and hybrid THR’s in young patients.

Conclusions: Considering these patients are young and active these results are good and support the use of resurfacing. However, further study is needed to address the early failures; particularly those related to fracture and metal debris.

The presence of pseudotumours, which are soft-tissue masses relating to the hip, after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty has been associated with elevated levels of metal ions in serum, suggesting that pseudotumours occur when there is increased wear. We aimed to quantify the wear in vivo of implants revised for pseudotumours (eight) and of a control group of implants (22) revised for other reasons of failure.

We found that the implant group with pseudotumours had a significantly higher rate of median linear wear of the femoral component at 8.1 μm/year (2.75 to 25.4) than the 1.79 μm/year (0.82 to 4.15; p = 0.002) of the non-pseudotumour group. For the acetabular component a significantly higher rate of median linear wear of 7.36 μm/year (1.61 to 24.9) was observed in the pseudotumour group compared with 1.28 μm/year (0.81 to 3.33, p = 0.001) in the other group. Wear of the acetabular component in the pseudotumour group always involved the edge of the implant, indicating that edge-loading had occurred.

Our findings are the first direct evidence that pseudotumour is associated with increased wear at the metal-on-metal articulation. Furthermore, edge-loading with the loss of fluid-film lubrication may be an important mechanism of generation of wear in patients with a pseudotumour.

We report on a group of 20 metal-on-metal resurfaced hips (17 patients) presenting with a soft tissue mass associated with various symptoms. We describe these masses as pseudotumours.

All patients underwent plain radiography and fuller investigation with CT, MRI and ultrasound. Where samples were available, histology was performed. All patients in this series were female. Presentation was variable; the most common symptom was pain or discomfort in the hip region. Other symptoms included spontaneous dislocation, nerve palsy, an enlarging mass or a rash. The common histological features were extensive necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration. Fourteen of the 20 cases (70%) have so far required revision to a conventional hip replacement and their symptoms have either settled completely or improved substantially since the revision surgery. Two of the three bilateral cases have asymptomatic pseudotumours on the opposite side.

We estimate that about 1% of patients develop a pseudotumour in the first five postoperative years after a hip resurfacing. The cause of these pseudotumours is unknown and is probably multi-factorial, further work is required to define this; they may be manifestations of a metal sensitivity response. We are concerned that with time the incidence of these pseudotumours will increase.

Introduction: We report on a group of 20 metal-on-metal resurfaced hips (17 patients) presenting with a soft tissue mass associated with various symptoms; these masses we termed pseudotumours. All patients underwent plane radiography; CT, MRI and ultrasound investigations were also performed for some patients. Where samples were available histology was performed.

Methods: All patients in this series were female. Presentation was variable; the most common symptom was pain or discomfort in the hip region. Other symptoms included spontaneous dislocation, nerve palsy, a noticeable mass or a rash. The common histological features were extensive necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration. Fourteen of the 20 cases (70%) have so far required revision to a conventional hip replacement and their symptoms have either settled completely or improved substantially since the revision surgery. Two of the three bilateral cases have asymptomatic pseudotumours on the opposite side.

Conclusions: We estimate that about 1% of patients develop a pseudotumour in the first five postoperative years after a hip resurfacing. The cause of these pseudotumours is unknown and is probably multi-factorial, further work is required to define this; they may be manifestations of a metal sensitivity response. We are concerned that with time the incidence of these pseudotumours will increase.

Inflammatory pseudotumours occasionally occur after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and often lead to revision. Our aim was to determine the severity of this complication by assessing the outcome of revision in these circumstances and by comparing this with the outcome of other metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revisions as well as that of matched primary total hip replacements.

We identified 53 hips which had undergone metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and required revision at a mean of 1.59 years (0.01 to 6.69) after operation. Of these, 16 were revised for pseudotumours, 21 for fracture and 16 for other reasons. These were matched by age, gender and diagnosis with 103 patients undergoing primary total hip replacement with the Exeter implant.

At a mean follow-up of three years (0.8 to 7.2) the outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revision for pseudotumour was poor with a mean Oxford hip score of 20.9 (sd 9.3) and was significantly worse (p < 0.001) than the outcome for fracture with a mean Oxford hip score of 40.2 (sd 9.2) or that for other causes with a mean Oxford hip score of 37.8 (sd 9.4). The clinical outcome of revision for pseudotumour was also significantly worse (p < 0.001) than the outcome of matched primary total hip replacements. By contrast, the outcome for fracture and other causes was not significantly different from that of matched primary total hip replacements (p = 0.065). After revision for pseudotumour there were three cases of recurrent dislocation, three of palsy of the femoral nerve, one of stenosis of the femoral artery and two of loosening of the component. Five hips required further revision. In three of these there was evidence of recurrent pseudotumour, and one is currently awaiting further revision. The incidence of major complications after revision for pseudotumour (50%) was significantly higher (p = 0.018) than that after revision for other causes (14%).

The outcome of revision for pseudotumour is poor and consideration should be given to early revision to limit the extent of the soft-tissue destruction. The outcome of resurfacing revision for other causes is good.

Introduction: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after resurfacing hip replacement is an important complication which may lead to fracture or failure. We compared the changes in femoral head oxygenation resulting from the anterolateral approach to those resulting from the posterior approach.

Methods: In 22 patients undergoing hip resurfacing surgery, a calibrated gas-sensitive electrode was inserted supero-laterally in the femoral head via the femoral neck following division of the fascia lata. Inter-operative X-ray confirmed correct electrode placement. Baseline oxygen concentration levels were recorded immediately after electrode insertion. All results were expressed relative to this baseline, which was considered as 100% relative oxygen concentration. Oxygen levels were monitored continuously throughout the operation. 10 patients underwent surgery through the posterior approach, 12 patients through the antero-lateral approach.

Results: During the operation patterns were similar for both groups, except following joint relocation and soft tissue reconstruction; oxygen concentration recovered significantly in the anterolateral group only. The posterior approach resulted in significantly lower (p< 0.01) oxygen concentration at the end of the procedure (22%, SD 31) than the antero-lateral approach (123%, SD 99).

Discussion and Conclusion: The anterolateral approach disrupts the femoral head blood supply significantly less than the posterior approach in patients undergoing resurfacing. The incidence of complications related to avascular necrosis might be decreased by adopting blood supply conserving surgical approaches.

Introduction: Optimal positioning of the femoral component in hip resurfacing is determined by accurate guidwire placement in the centre of the femoral neck. This can be a challenging procedure. The more extensile approach needed, patient size, the shape of the femoral head and the presences of osteophytes can all result in sub-optimal guidewire positioning and ultimately in varus insertion or femoral notching both of which have been shown to increase the risk of post-operative fracture, the commonest cause of implant failure. Various alignment guides are available but these are cumbersome and time consuming and their accuracy is highly operator dependent. Anecdotally, accuate guidewire insertion is regarded as the most challenging part of this procedure with heightened anxiety levels particularly when low down on the‘learning curve’.

Methods: We describe the technique, difficulties and learning curve experienced with the first ten navigated hip resurfacing procedures at our institution. Post-operative radiographs were obtained and randomly incorporated into a series of 40 post-operative resurfacing radiographs. Radiographic assessment was undertaken by a senior colleague with experience of over 600 resurfacing procedures (blinded to which cases utilised navigation) and classified as poor, satisfactory or good.

Results: The use of navigation in femoral resurfacing has a definite but short learning curve. It provides a means of achieving excellent alignment of the femoral component without any subjective increase in operation time. Anxiety levels associated with accurate guidewire positioning are greatly reduced. Navigation should offer benefits to all surgeons particularly those low down on the ‘learning curve’ for this procedure reducing the risk of femoral component malpositioning and early failure.

We report 17 patients (20 hips) in whom metal-on-metal resurfacing had been performed and who presented with various symptoms and a soft-tissue mass which we termed a pseudotumour. Each patient underwent plain radiography and in some, CT, MRI and ultrasonography were also performed. In addition, histological examination of available samples was undertaken.

All the patients were women and their presentation was variable. The most common symptom was discomfort in the region of the hip. Other symptoms included spontaneous dislocation, nerve palsy, a noticeable mass or a rash. The common histological features were extensive necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration. To date, 13 of the 20 hips have required revision to a conventional hip replacement. Two are awaiting revision.

We estimate that approximately 1% of patients who have a metal-on-metal resurfacing develop a pseudotumour within five years. The cause is unknown and is probably multifactorial. There may be a toxic reaction to an excess of particulate metal wear debris or a hypersensitivity reaction to a normal amount of metal debris. We are concerned that with time the incidence of these pseudotumours may increase. Further investigation is required to define their cause.