INDEPENDENT 5 YEAR RESULTS OF THE BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING

Abstract

Introduction: Although resurfacing hip replacements are widely used there are few little independent outcome data to support this. The aim of this study was to report the 5 year clinical outcome and 7 year survival of an independent series.

Method: 610 Birmingham hip resurfacings were implanted in 532 patients with an average age of 51.8 years (range 16.5–81.6 years) and were followed for between 2 to 8 years; 120 of this series had minimum five year follow-up. Two patients were lost. There were 23 revisions, giving an overall survival of 95% (95% CI 85–99%) at seven years. Fractured neck of femur (n=13) was the most common reason for revision, followed by aseptic loosening (n=4). There were also 3 patients who had failures that were possibly related to metal debris. At a minimum of 5 year follow-up 93% had excellent or good outcome according to the Harris Hip Score. The mean Oxford Hip Score was 16.1 points (SD 7.7) and the mean UCLA activity score was 6.6 points (SD 1.9). There were no patients with definite evidence of radiographic loosening or greater than 10% of neck narrowing.

Discussion: The results demonstrate that with the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing, implanted using the extended posterior approach, the five year survival is similar or better to the reported survival rates for cemented and hybrid THR’s in young patients.

Conclusions: Considering these patients are young and active these results are good and support the use of resurfacing. However, further study is needed to address the early failures; particularly those related to fracture and metal debris.