Primary bone tumours of the talus are rare. Currently the existing literature is limited to a single case series and case reports or cases described in series of foot tumours. Information regarding the patient's demographics and tumour types is therefore limited. The aim of this study was to investigate these questions and also suggest a management protocol for suspected primary bone tumours of the talus. We retrospectively reviewed the Scottish Bone Tumour Register from January 1954 to May 2010 and included all primary bone tumours of the talus. We identified only twenty three bone tumours over fifty six years highlighting the rarity of these tumours. There were twenty benign and three malignant tumours with a mean age of twenty eight years. A delay in presentation was common with a mean time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of ten months. Tumour types identified were consistent with previous literature. We identified cases of desmoplastic fibroma and intraosseous lipodystrophy described for the first time. We suggest an investigatory and treatment protocol for patients with a suspected primary bone tumour of the talus. This is the largest series of primary bone tumours of the talus in the literature.
Osteoid osteoma is a classically described benign bone tumour. Traditionally, the surgical treatment of choice was excision, but this can have significant morbidity. In recent years, percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) has grown in popularity as an alternative treatment. This study reports the outcomes using this technique in our regional bone tumour unit. Between May 2003 and October 2007, 14 patients (female, n=4; male, n = 10) aged 15 - 32yrs (mean age, 20.4yrs) underwent CT guided radiofrequency ablation treatment. These patients had typical radiograph, CT, MRI or isotope bone scan features of osteoid osteoma and had significant pain symptoms. The protocol for ablation in our institute is heating the tip of the electrode to 90°C for 6 minutes. All patients were subsequently offered follow up in the out-patient clinic. Outcomes were taken from the Scottish Bone Tumour Registry database. 11 patients (78.6%) patients had complete resolution of symptoms after one RF treatment. 3 (21.4%) cases were unsuccessful but 1 of these was due to technical failure. All 3 of the above patients had complete relief of symptoms after one further RF treatment. 1 (7.1%) patient initially had complete relief of symptoms, but suffered a recurrence after 9 months. This patient also had a second curative treatment. Follow up ranged from 3 – 18 months (mean 10 months). Percutaneous RFA for osteoid osteoma is an attractive treatment due to its efficacy and low morbidity. Our results showed a primary success rate of 78%, a secondary success rate of 100% (after one additional procedure) and a recurrence rate of 7.1%. These are comparable to previous reported series. We believe our results add to the growing literature supporting radiofrequency ablation as the treatment of choice for osteoid osteoma.
Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP) is a benign lesion of bone originally described by Nora et al in 1983. To date there are no UK-based case series in the literature. Here we present the Scottish Bone Tumour Registry (SBTR) experience of this rare lesion. A retrospective analysis of SBTR records was performed. Histological specimens were re-examined by a consultant musculoskeletal oncology pathologist. Radiographs were re-reported by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist. From 1983-2009, 13 cases were identified; 6 male, 7 female. Age ranged from 13-65. All patients presented with localised swelling. Pain was present in 5 and trauma in 2. 9 lesions affected the hand, 3 the foot, and 1 the tibial tuberosity. 12 lesions were excised and 1 curetted. There were 7 recurrences of which 6 were excised. 1 patients' recurrence was not treated. 1 lesion recurred a second time. This was excised. There were no metastases. Radiographs typically showed densely mineralised lesions contiguous with an uninvolved cortex. Cortical breakthrough was present in 1 case and scalloping in another. Histology characteristically showed hypercellular cartilage with pleomorphism and calcification/ossification without atypia; bone undergoing maturation; and a spindle-cell stroma. SBTR records indicate that BPOP is a rare lesion with no sex predilection that affects patients over a wide age range. Minor antecedent trauma was present in only 2 cases. In agreement with Nora et al. we feel that trauma is unlikely to represent an aetiological factor. Recurrence was over 50% in this series. Although this is similar to that found in other reports, it may indicate that more extensive resection is required for this aggressive lesion. Finally, although radiological/histological findings are often bizarre there have been no reported metastases and so it is important that BPOP is not mistaken for, or treated as, a malignant process such as chondrosarcoma.
The role of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in sarcoma surgery is well established. There are no guidelines for their use in this context but there is pressure from microbiologists to comply with agreed prophylaxis for joint arthroplasty despite major differences between patient groups and risks of infection in sarcoma surgery. Two simple surveys were conducted online, the first for bone sarcoma surgery, the second for soft tissue sarcomas. An email was sent to the major centres worldwide conducting such surgery with links to the online surveys to assess current practice regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical drains. The survey was limited to 8 questions, the emphasis being a simple survey, but included questions on indications, choice, duration of therapy as well as use, size and duration of surgical drains. We received 38 responses from 15 countries to the bone sarcoma survey and 33 responses from 12 countries to the soft tissue sarcoma survey. Current antibiotic prophylaxis regimens varied widely among surgeons, emphasising the controversy that exists regarding what constitutes best clinical practice. Opinions regarding use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in sarcoma surgery vary widely among orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, illustrating the controversy as to what constitutes best clinical practice. This survey suggests the need for a randomised clinical trial to aid in the development of guidelines in this area.
Histological specimens were re-examined by a consultant musculoskeletal oncology pathologist. Radiographs were re-reported by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist.
All patients presented with localised swelling. Pain was present in 5 and trauma in 2. 9 lesions affected the hand, 3 the foot, and 1 the tibial tuberosity. 12 lesions were excised and 1 curetted. There were 7 recurrences of which 6 were excised. 1 patients’ recurrence was not treated. 1 lesion recurred a second time. This was excised. There were no metastases. Radiographs typically showed densely mineralised lesions contiguous with an uninvolved cortex. Cortical breakthrough was present in 1 case and scalloping in another. Histology characteristically showed: hypercellular cartilage with pleomorphism and alcification/ossification without atypia; bone undergoing maturation; and a spindle-cell stroma.
Minor antecedent trauma was present in only 2 cases. In agreement with Nora et al. we feel that trauma is unlikely to represent an aetiological factor. Recurrence was over 50% in this series. Although this is similar to that found in other reports, it may indicate that more extensive resection is required for this aggressive lesion. Finally, although radiological/histological findings are often bizarre there have been no reported metastases and so it is important that BPOP is not mistaken for, or treated as, a malignant process such as chondrosarcoma.
No dislocations were noted during follow-up (range 3–48 months). Radiographs revealed an average vertical displacement of the humeral head compared to its original position of 0.7 cm (range 0–1.7 cm). There were two surgical complications. In one patient the humeral prosthesis migrated proximally and eroded through the skin requiring additional surgery. In another case erosion of the distal clavicle was noted. This was biopsied and foreign body reaction identified.
Limb salvage surgery includes all of the surgical procedures designed to accomplish removal of a malignant tumour and reconstruction of the limb in order to achieve an acceptable oncological, functional, and cosmetic result. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome following endoprosthetic replcament for primary upper &
lower extremity musculoskeletal neolplasms. Between 1983 and 2004, we found 68 patients from the Scottish Tumor Register having had an endoprosthetic reconstruction for upper and lower-extremity malignant musculoskeletal tumours, of which 32 were alive for performing functional assessment (lower extremity-26, upper extremity-6). The clinical, radiological and oncological outcomes were evaluated. The functional outcome was measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score. The average follow-up was 59 months (range, 1 to 21 years). There were 19 female and 13 male patients. These were anatomically distributed as around the knee (n=18 cases), hip (n=8) and shoulder (n=4). The most common diagnosis was chondrosarcoma (n=10) and osteosarcoma (n=11). Most of the patients were completely satisfied with their condition, with a decreased walking distance as the only notable restriction. There was no correlation between the functional outcome and the type or site of resection. Complications occurred in ten cases, including two cases of aseptic loosening and one case each of recurrent instability, sciatic nerve palsy and femoral nerve palsy. The median functional score using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society system was 56% and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score was 72%. Limb salvage for malignant musculoskeletal tumours continues to pose therapeutic and oncological challenges with considerable functional issues, but the good function and local tumour control in most patients justifies its continued use.
Giant cell tumor of bone is a benign lesion that is ‘locally aggressive and potentially malignant’. The most common specific location of ‘GCT’ is about the knee (50–65%), followed by the distal radius (10–12%), sacrum (4–9%) and proximal humerus (3%–8%). The pelvis is recognized as an infrequent site of involvement accounting for as few as 2% to 3% of all giant cell tumors. Giant cell tumors often can reach an alarming size in the pelvis jeopardizing the surrounding structures. Treatment options described in literature for pelvic giant cell tumors include radiation therapy; surgery with intralesional margin; surgery with an intralesional margin and physical adjuvants, and surgery with wide margins. Following Type II (Periacetabular) resections the two preferred modes of reconstruction are either Saddle Prosthesis or Ilio femoral fusion. But, in patients with extensive periacetabular involvement with tumor extension into ilium the type II resection has to be combined with a Type I (Ilial) resection. This may result in insufficient ilium being available for reconstruction to consider either a iliofemoral fusion or a saddle prosthesis. In such situations we recommend Sacroiliofemoral fusion as a novel variation of iliofemoral arthrodesis. We present two cases of GCT of pelvis with significant periacetabular involvement treated by Sacroiliofemoral fusion. A follow up at 2 years in both cases showed no recurrences, mean MSTS of 21 &
TESS of 70. This paper discusses the various treatment options for such extensive periacetbular giant cell tumors, operative technique for sacroiliofemoral fusion, outcome evaluation after 2 years by MSTS &
Toronto Extremity Salvage scores.
40 linked total elbow replacements were inserted into 35 patients over a 12-year period. The mean age was 67. 3 years, (range 48 to 87 years) and the mean follow up 50 months (range 8 to 134 months). Each patient had undergone at least 1 operation prior to the index arthroplasty (range 1 to 10). 27 elbows were flail and 13 unstable due to previous failed total elbow replacements in 23, gross bony erosion due to rheumatoid arthritis in 9, distal humeral non-union in 6 and Charcot joints due to syringomyelia in 2. A Coonrad Morrey sloppy hinge prosthesis was implanted in 25 elbows and a snap-fit Souter Strath-clyde prosthesis in 15. The technique included preservation of the triceps mechanism and early mobilisation in most cases. At review 38 elbows had no or mild pain, 2 moderate, and no patient had severe pain. All patients achieved a functional range of movement. There was no linkage failure of any implant. Complications included revision for aseptic loosening of one humeral and one ulnar component, debridement for infection in one and curettage and bone grafting of a cement granuloma in one. One patient with a Charcot joint developed a non-union after failure of plating and grafting of a periprosthetic fracture at the tip of the humeral component. In addition six had delayed wound healing, two ulnar nerve symptoms and two triceps weakness. In conclusion, a linked elbow replacement can reliably provide stability, mobility and pain relief in a flail or unstable joint allowing the hand to be positioned in space and therefore the function of the limb is dramatically improved. This method is especially appropriate in elderly frail patients.