Abstract
Objectives: To investigate whether components of MSTS-87 (Pain, ROM, Strength, Stability, Deformity, Acceptance and Function) correlate with function as measured by TESS following endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) for patients with bone sarcoma.
Methods: 255 patients with extremity bone sarcoma treated by resection & EPR were identified from a prospective database. From this group we investigated 111 patients with primary bone sarcoma with > 2 years follow up, evaluated by both MSTS-87 & TESS, no local recurrence, metastasis or major complication for at least 2 years prior to the follow-up. Upper extremity patients were excluded due to small numbers. We examined the influence of patient demographics and tumour characteristics on functional outcome scores. Correlation between MSTS-87 & TESS was performed using linear regression analysis.
Results: Age, gender, tumour size, anatomical site, chemotherapy treatment and presence of pathological fracture did not significantly correlate with TESS. Linear regression analysis of MSTS-87 individual criteria and total score revealed that only pain, ROM and function helped explain the TESS score (p < 0.05) while strength, stability, deformity & acceptance had no significant effect on overall functional outcome.
Conclusions: Of the seven MSTS-87 variables, only pain, ROM and function significantly correlate with overall functional outcome as measured by TESS following EPR for bone sarcoma. This suggests that patients with decreased strength, stability, deformity and acceptance as defined by MSTS-87 scores, may still adapt well with good overall functional outcomes.
Correspondence should be addressed to BOOS c/o British Orthopaedic Association, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England