Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CONTROLLED, DIFFERENTIAL, DISTRACTION IN RESISTANT, RELAPSED & NEGLECTED CLUBFEET



Abstract

Background: In developing countries, many patients are seen with neglected, residual or recurrent CTEV. Treatment of resistant & neglected CTEV has been a subject of much controversy as the pathoanatomy becomes complex & the true cause of disability becomes difficult to ascertain at times. We treated such patients by controlled, differential, distraction using Joshi’s external stabilisation system (JESS).

Aim of study: To explore the role & long term results (minimum follow up 3 years) of controlled, differential, distraction using JESS in relapsed & neglected clubfeet.

Methods: 82 patients with 24 bilateral cases (106 feet) treated by JESS at the department of Orthopaedics, KGMU, India from 1992 onwards; followed up for a minimum of 3 years post surgery (average follow up 6.5 years). Patients with non-idiopathic club foot were not included in this study. Outcome evaluation was done by clinical, podographic(footprint), radiological & functional outcomes using Hospital for Joint diseases Orthopaedic Institute functional rating system for clubfoot surgery.

Results: Excellent results were obtained in 63%, good in 30% & poor in 7% of the cases. 21% had a partial relapse with only 5% requiring further surgery for deformity correction. 11% of cases needed further surgery in the form of flexor tenotomies, subtalar & mid-foot fusion for persistent pain

Conclusion: Controlled, differential, fractional distraction with JESS is a safe & effective procedure for neglected, resistant & relapsed CTEV. It is effective even in patients after skeletal maturity in correcting the deformity. The procedure is less invasive and the results are good irrespective of the severity of the deformity or age of the patient.

Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Singh, BOFAS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.