Aims. Our primary aim was to establish the proportion of female orthopaedic consultants who perform arthroplasty via cases submitted to the National Joint Registry (NJR), which covers England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and Guernsey. Secondary aims included comparing time since specialist registration, private practice participation, and number of hospitals worked in between male and female surgeons. Methods. Publicly available data from the NJR was extracted on the types of arthroplasty performed by each surgeon, and the number of procedures of each type undertaken. Each surgeon was cross-referenced with the General Medical Council (GMC) website, using GMC number to extract surgeon demographic data. These included sex, region of practice, and dates of full and specialist registration. Results. Of 2,895 surgeons contributing to the NJR in 2023, 102 (4%) were female. The highest proportions of female surgeons were among those who performed elbow (n = 25; 5%), shoulder (n = 24; 4%), and ankle (n = 8; 4%) arthroplasty. Hip (n = 66; 3%) and knee arthroplasty (n = 39; 2%) had the lowest female representation. Female surgeons had been practising for a median of 10.4 years since specialist registration compared to 13.7 years for males (p < 0.001). Northern Ireland was the region with the highest proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons (8%). A greater proportion of male surgeons worked in private practice (63% vs 24%; p < 0.001) and in multiple hospitals (74% vs 40%; p < 0.001). Conclusion. Only 4% of surgeons currently contributing cases to the NJR are female, with the highest proportion performing elbow arthroplasty (5%). Female orthopaedic surgeons in the NJR are earlier in their careers than male surgeons, and are less involved in private practice. There is a wide geographical variation in the proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):637–643

Aims. The number of females within the speciality of trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) is increasing. The aim of this study was to identify: 1) current attitudes and behaviours of UK female T&O surgeons towards pregnancy; 2) any barriers faced towards pregnancy with a career in T&O surgery; and 3) areas for improvement. Methods. This is a cross-sectional study using an anonymous 13-section web-based survey distributed to female-identifying T&O trainees, speciality and associate specialist surgeons (SASs) and locally employed doctors (LEDs), fellows, and consultants in the UK. Demographic data was collected as well as closed and open questions with adaptive answering relating to attitudes towards childbearing and experiences of fertility and complications associated with pregnancy. A descriptive data analysis was carried out. Results. A total of 226 UK female T&O surgeons completed the survey. All regions of the UK were represented. Overall, 99/226 (44%) of respondents had at least one child, while 21/226 (9.3%) did not want children. Median age at first child was 33 years (interquartile range 32 to 36). Two-thirds (149/226; 66%) of respondents delayed childbearing due to a career in T&O and 140/226 (69%) of respondents had experienced bias from colleagues directed at female T&O surgeons having children during training. Nearly 24/121 (20%) of respondents required fertility assistance, 35/121 (28.9%) had experienced a miscarriage, and 53/121 (43.8%) had experienced obstetric complications. Conclusion. A large proportion of female T&O surgeons have and want children. T&O surgeons in the UK delay childbearing, have experienced bias and have high rates of infertility and obstetric complications. The information from this study will support female T&O surgeons with decision making and assist employers with workforce planning. Further steps are necessary in order to support female T&O surgeons having families. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):970–979

Aims. As an increasing number of female surgeons are choosing orthopaedics, it is important to recognize the impact of pregnancy within this cohort. The aim of this review was to examine common themes and data surrounding pregnancy, parenthood, and fertility within orthopaedics. Methods. A systematic review was conducted by searching Medline, Emcare, Embase, PsycINFO, OrthoSearch, and the Cochrane Library in November 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis were adhered to. Original research papers that focused on pregnancy and/or parenthood within orthopaedic surgery were included for review. Results. Of 1,205 papers, 19 met the inclusion criteria. Our results found that orthopaedic surgeons have higher reported rates of obstetric complications, congenital abnormalities, and infertility compared to the general population. They were noted to have children at a later age and voluntarily delayed childbearing. Negative perceptions of pregnancy from fellow trainees and programme directors were identified. Conclusion. Female orthopaedic surgeons have high rates of obstetric complications and infertility. Negative perceptions surrounding pregnancy can lead to orthopaedic surgeons voluntarily delaying childbearing. There is a need for a pregnancy-positive culture shift combined with formalized guidelines and female mentorship to create a more supportive environment for pregnancy within orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(8):857–863

Orthopaedics has been left behind in the worldwide drive towards diversity and inclusion. In the UK, only 7% of orthopaedic consultants are female. There is growing evidence that diversity increases innovation as well as patient outcomes. This paper has reviewed the literature to identify some of the common issues affecting female surgeons in orthopaedics, and ways in which we can address them: there is a wealth of evidence documenting the differences in the journey of men and women towards a consultant role. We also look at lessons learned from research in the business sector and the military. The ‘Hidden Curriculum’ is out of date and needs to enter the 21st century: microaggressions in the workplace must be challenged; we need to consider more flexible training options and support trainees who wish to become pregnant; mentors, both male and female, are imperative to provide support for trainees. The world has changed, and we need to consider how we can improve diversity to stay relevant and effective. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2-10:893–899

Introduction. The medical field has long held largely anecdotal beliefs that polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) vapors are dangerous to a growing fetus, and as such, women who are pregnant should avoid exposure. This study investigates the perceptions of female orthopedic surgeons regarding PMMA cement exposure during pregnancy, and if it influences 1) currently held beliefs / practices and 2) clinical and career choices. Methods. A 23-question survey was distributed via e-mail to active members of the Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society and a private social media group for women in orthopedics. Questions included demographics, current usage of PMMA, previous exposure during pregnancy and/or breastfeeding, and beliefs regarding current or future willingness of exposure. Additionally, questions were asked regarding PMMA training and whether beliefs influenced specialty choices. Results. There were 278 survey responses received, of which 256 met inclusion criteria. 73% currently utilize PMMA in training/practice, and >90% of survey respondents reported awareness of risks surrounding PMMA in pregnancy. PMMA training was found to have a weak positive correlation with those who remained in the room while pregnant. 43.6% would leave the room in the future if PMMA were being used while they were pregnant, with 26.2% leaving if they were breastfeeding. 24.9% would leave if they were the primary surgeon on the case, and 8.4% admitted that PMMA exposure during pregnancy factored into which subspecialty they chose. Conclusion. This survey demonstrates a lack of consensus amongst female orthopedic surgeons regarding the risks posed by remaining in a room during pregnancy and breastfeeding while PMMA is used. Despite 90% of respondents claiming awareness of the risks of PMMA, beliefs and education practices should be examined to determine if they match the available literature. It is plausible that beliefs regarding this exposure are deterring individuals from pursuing specialties where PMMA is used regularly. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aims. Global literature suggests that female surgical trainees have lower rates of independent operating (operative autonomy) than their male counterparts. The objective of this study was to identify any association between gender and lead/independent operating in speciality orthopaedic trainees within the UK national training programme. Methods. This was a retrospective case-control study using electronic surgical logbook data from 2009 to 2021 for 274 UK orthopaedic trainees. Total operative numbers and level of supervision were compared between male and female trainees, with correction for less than full-time training (LTFT), prior experience, and time out during training (OOP). The primary outcome was the percentage of cases undertaken as lead surgeon (supervised and unsupervised) by UK orthopaedic trainees by gender. Results. All participants gave permission for their data to be used. In total, 274 UK orthopaedic trainees submitted data (65% men (n = 177) and 33% women (n = 91)), with a total of 285,915 surgical procedures logged over 1,364 trainee-years. Males were lead surgeon (under supervision) on 3% more cases than females (61% (115,948/189,378) to 58% (50,285/86,375), respectively; p < 0.001), and independent operator (unsupervised) on 1% more cases. A similar trend of higher operative numbers in male trainees was seen for senior (ST6 to 8) trainees (+5% and +1%; p < 0.001), those with no time OOP (+6% and +8%; p < 0.001), and those with orthopaedic experience prior to orthopaedic specialty training (+7% and +3% for lead surgeon and independent operator, respectively; p < 0.001). The gender difference was less marked for those on LTFT training, those who took time OOP, and those with no prior orthopaedic experience. Conclusion. This study showed that males perform 3% more cases as the lead surgeon than females during UK orthopaedic training (p < 0.001). This may be due to differences in how cases are recorded, but must engender further research to ensure that all surgeons are treated equitably during their training. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(7):821–832

The February 2023 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: S2AI screws: At what cost?; Just how good is spinal deformity surgery?; Is 80 years of age too late in the day for spine surgery?; Factors affecting the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in robot-assisted surgery; Factors causing delay in discharge in patients eligible for ambulatory lumbar fusion surgery; Anterior cervical discectomy or fusion and selective laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Surgery for cervical radiculopathy: what is the complication burden?; Hypercholesterolemia and neck pain; Return to work after surgery for cervical radiculopathy: a nationwide registry-based observational study.

Sufficient primary stability of the acetabular cup is essential for stable osseous integration of the implant after total hip arthroplasty. By means of under-reaming the cavities press-fit cups gain their primary stability in the acetabular bone stock. These metal-backed cups are inserted intra-operatively using an impact hammer. The aim of this experimental study was to obtain the forces exerted by the hammer both in-vivo and in-vitro as well as to determine the resulting primary stability of the cups in-vitro. Two different artificial bone models were applied to simulate osteoporotic and sclerotic bone. Polymeth-acrylamid (PMI, ROHACELL 110 IG, Gaugler & Lutz, Germany) was used as an osteoporotic bone substitute, whereas a composite model made of a PMI-Block and a 4 mm thick (cortical) Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) layer (AIREX C70.200, Gaugler & Lutz, Germany) was deployed to simulate sclerotic bone. In all artificial bone blocks cavities were reamed for a press-fit cup (Trident PSL, Size 56mm, Stryker, USA) using the original surgical instrument. The impactor of the cup was equipped with a piezoelectric ring sensor (PCB Piezotronics, Germany). Using the standard surgical hammer (1.2kg) the acetabular cups were implanted into the bone substitute material by a male (95kg) and a female (75kg) surgeon. Subsequently, primary stability of the implant (n=5) was determined in a pull-out test setup using a universal testing machine (Z050, Ziwck/Roell, Germany). For validation the impaction forces were recorded intra-operatively using the identical press-fit cup design. An average impaction force of 4.5±0.6kN and 6.3±0.4kN using the PMI and the composite bone models respectively were achieved by the female surgeon in vitro. 7.4±1.5kN and 7.7±0.8kN respectively were obtained by the male surgeon who reached an average in-vivo impaction force of 7.5±1.6kN. Using the PMI-model a pull-out force of 298±72N and 201±112N were determined for the female and male surgeons respectively. However, using the composite bone model approximately half the pull-out force was measured for the female surgeon (402±39N) compared to the male surgeon (869±208N). Our results show that impact forces measured in-vitro correspond to the data recorded in-vivo. Using the osteoporotic bone model the pull-out test revealed that too high impaction forces affect the pull-out force negatively and hence the primary implant stability is reduced, whereas higher impact forces improve primary stability considerably in the sclerotic bone model. In conclusion, the amount of impaction force contributes to the quality of the obtained primary cup stability substantially and should be adjusted intra-operatively according to the bone quality of each individual patient

Aims

Gender bias and sexual discrimination (GBSD) have been widely recognized across a range of fields and are now part of the wider social consciousness. Such conduct can occur in the medical workplace, with detrimental effects on recipients. The aim of this review was to identify the prevalence and impact of GBSD in orthopaedic surgery, and to investigate interventions countering such behaviours.

Aims

To investigate the experience and emotional impact of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) on orthopaedic surgeons and identify holistic strategies to improve the management of PJI and protect surgeons’ wellbeing.

Introduction: To obtain secondary implant stability of acetabular press-fit cups, sufficient primary stability is essential. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of cup insertion force and bone quality on the primary implant stability. Materials and Methods: The experiments were carried out using two commercially available press-fit acetabular cups (Trident PSL, Stryker und EP-FIT PLUS, PLUS Ortho-peadics), comparable in design and with identical diameters, which were inserted axially into artificial bone by a female and a male surgeon. Two bone substitute material models were used. To imitate osteoporotic bone, a PMI-model (ROHACELL 110 IG, Gaugler & Lutz oHG) was employed. To simulate sclerotic bone, a composite-model made of a PMI-bloc with a 4 mm thick PVC-layer (AIREX C70.200, Gaugler & Lutz oHG) was used. The cups were inserted using an insertion device, equipped with a force sensor, and an 1100 g surgical hammer. Additionally, all experiments were carried out using a dynamic testing machine (25 kN, Instron) utilising insertion forces of 4.0 kN and 8.0 kN respectively. Primary implant stability was determined via lever-out tests using a static universal testing machine (Z050, Zwick/Roell). Results: On average an insertion force of 4.8 kN (female) and 7.0 kN (male) using the PMI-model and 6.2 kN (female) and 7.5 kN (male) for the composite-model was assessed for the two different surgeons. The machined forces averaged 3.8 kN and 7.9 kN. Lever-out-moments of 17 Nm were determined for both the PMI- and composite-model for the female surgeon using the PSL cup, whereas 27 Nm and 70 Nm, respectively, were reached for the EP-FIT shell. For the male surgeon using the PSL cup, lever-out moments of 15 Nm and 30 Nm for the PMI- and composite-model respectively were determined. Insertion of the EP-FIT cup resulted in lever-out moments of 10 Nm using the PMI-model and 82 Nm using the composite-model. The low machined insertion force led to average lever-out moments of 34 Nm for the PSL and 71 Nm for the EP-FIT cups using the composite-model. For the high machined force, the highest lever-out moments of 44 Nm and 99 Nm for the PSL and EP-FIT shells respectively were determined. Conclusion: Using the composite-model (sclerotic bone), higher insertion forces lead to higher lever-out moments and hence higher primary implant stability for both tested cups. However, a high, non axial applied force can result in loss of stability using the PMI-model (osteoprotic bone). Compared to the manually inserted acetabular cups, the machined insertion resulted in higher primary stability for both implants and artificial bone types