Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the tapered cone stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with excessive femoral anteversion and after femoral osteotomy.

For over a decade, modular titanium fluted tapered (TFT) stems have demonstrated excellent clinical success for femoral revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. The aim of this study was to report the short-term outcomes of a novel modern monoblock TFT stem used for revision and complex primary THA with a minimum of 2 years follow-up.

We identified 126 patients who received a single monoblock TFT stem - 26 patients for complex THA (failed fracture fixation) and 100 patients for revision THA. The reasons for revision THA included 40 for previous prosthetic joint infection (PJI), 42 for aseptic loosening, 9 for trunnionosis, 9 for periprosthetic fractures. The Paprosky grading for femoral bone loss at the time of surgery and the measured subsidence of femoral stems at 3 months follow-up were determined. We evaluated the number and indications for re-operations.

The mean time from surgery was 3.9 years (range 2.0 to 6.9 years). A paired t-test analysis showed significant improvement from pre-operative versus post-operative clinical outcome scores (p<0.001) for HHS (38.76 +/- 15.24vs. 83.42 +/- 15.38), WOMAC (45.6 ± 19.0 vs. 69.9 ± 21.3) and SF-12 Physical component (31.7 ± 8.1 vs. 37.8 ± 11.3) and SF-12 Mental component (48.2 ± 12.2 vs. 51.6 ± 12.5). The Paprosky grading for femoral bone loss was Grade 1 (3.9%), Grade 2 (35.7%), Grade 3A (47.6%), Grade 3B (11.1%) and Grade 4 (1.6%) cases. There were 18 re-operations (14.7%) with 13 for PJI (7 treated with implant retention, 6 treated with a two-staged revision), 4 for instability and one for acetabular aseptic loosening. There were no aseptic failures of the stem.

This novel modern monoblock TFT stem provided reliable femoral fixation and has increasingly supplanted the use of modular TFT stems for complex primary and revision surgery in our institution.

Aim of this study was to identify reoperation rates in patients with short oblique and transverse fractures around a well fixed cemented polished taper slip stem and to determine any associations with treatment failure.

Retrospective cohort study of 31 patients with AO transverse or short oblique Vancouver B1 PFFs around THA (total hip arthroplasty) cemented taper slip stems: 12 male (39%); mean age 74±11.9 (range 44–91); mean BMI 28.5±1.4 (range 16–48); and median ASA 3. Patient journeys were assessed, re-interventions reviewed. The primary outcome measure was reoperation.

Time from primary THA to fracture was 11.3±7.8yrs (0.5–26yrs). Primary surgical management was fixation in 27/31 and rTHA (revision total hip arthroplasty) in 4/31. 10 of 31 (32%) patients required reoperation, 9 within 2 years of fracture: 1 following rTHA and 8 following ORIF. The commonest mode of failure was non-union (n=6). No significant associations with reoperation requirement were identified. Kaplan-Meier free from reoperation was 67.4% (49.8–85.0 95% CI) at 2 years and this was unaffected by initial management with ORIF or rTHA (Log rank 0.898). Of those reoperated, 6/10 required multiple reoperations to obtain either bony union or a stable revision construct and 13% ultimately required proximal femoral endoprostheses. The relative risk of 1 year mortality was 1.6 (0.25 to 10.1 95%CI) among patients who required reoperation compared to those who did not.

These are difficult fractures to manage, should not be underestimated and patients should be counselled that there is a 30% risk of reoperation and 20% of requiring multiple reoperations.

Aims

When performing revision total hip arthroplasty using diaphyseal-engaging titanium tapered stems (TTS), the recommended 3 to 4 cm of stem-cortical diaphyseal contact may not be available. In challenging cases such as these with only 2 cm of contact, can sufficient axial stability be achieved and what is the benefit of a prophylactic cable? This study sought to determine, first, whether a prophylactic cable allows for sufficient axial stability when the contact length is 2 cm, and second, if differing TTS taper angles (2° vs 3.5°) impact these results.

The aim of the study was to report the survival of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Vancouver B fractures associated with the Exeter Stem (ES) at a minimum of 5 years.

This retrospective cohort study assessed 129 consecutive patients with Vancouver B type fractures treated with ORIF from 2008-2016 at a minimum of 5 years. Patient records were examined, and the following recorded: details of primary prosthesis, details of injury, Vancouver classification, details of operative management, complications, and requirement for reoperation. Data was analysed using SPSS. Survival analysis was undertaken using the endpoint ‘reoperation for any reason’.

Mean age at fracture was 78.2 (SD10.6, 46-96) and 54 (43%) were female. Vancouver subclassifications were: 24% B1, 70.5% B2 and 5.5% B3. For all Vancouver B fractures, Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated a 5 year survival free from reoperation of 88.8% (82.0-94.7 95%CI). Fourteen patients required reoperation, most commonly within the first year for non-union and plate fracture (5.4%). Five-year survival for any reoperation differed significantly according to fracture type (p=0.016) and was worst in B1s: B1 76.6% (61.3-91.9); B2 92.6% 986.9-98.3); and 100% of B3. Univariate analysis identified B1 type (p=0.008) and a transverse fracture pattern (p=0.003) to be significantly associated with the need for reoperation.

Adopting a strategy of fixation of all Vancouver B fractures involving the ES where the fracture was anatomically reducible and the bone cement interface was well-fixed was associated with a 5 year survival, free from reoperation of 88.8%.

The aim of this study is to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter).

This is a retrospective cohort study of 152 operatively managed consecutive unilateral Vancouver B fractures involving Exeter stems. 130 were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 22 with revision arthroplasty. Radiographs were assessed and classified by 3 observers. The primary outcome measure was revision of ≥1 component. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for revision following ORIF. Secondary outcomes included any reoperation, complications, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay and mortality.

Fractures (B1 n=74 (49%); B2 n=50 (33%); and B3 n=28 (18%)) occurred at mean 6.7±10.4 years after primary THA (n=143) or hemiarthroplasty (n=15). Mean follow up was 6.5 ±2.6 years (3.2 to 12.1). Rates of revision and reoperation were significantly higher following revision arthroplasty compared to ORIF for B2 (p=0.001) fractures and B3 fractures (p=0.05). Five-year survival was significantly better following ORIF: 92% (86.4 to 97.4 95%CI) Vs 63% (41.7 to 83.3), p<0.001. No independent predictors of revision following ORIF were identified: fixation of B2 or B3 fractures was not associated with an increased risk of revision. Dislocation was the commonest mode of failure after revision arthroplasty. ORIF was associated with reduced blood transfusion requirement and reoperations, but there were no differences in medical complications, hospital stay or mortality between surgical groups.

When the bone-cement interface was intact and the fracture was anatomically reducible, Vancouver B2 fractures around Exeter stems can be treated with fixation as opposed to revision arthroplasty. Fixation of Vancouver B3 fractures can be performed in frail elderly patients without increasing revision risk.

Revision hip arthroplasty presents a challenge in the setting of femoral bone loss. Tapered stems are susceptible to subsidence which leads to leg length inequality, hip instability and may necessitate repeat femoral revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes in two modular tapered revision systems with different distal stem geometries. We sought to establish the minimum postoperative stem bi-cortical contact length that predicts subsidence for tapered stems. This study examined revision total hip arthroplasties between 2009 and 2016 in a European university affiliated major trauma center. Modular stem A has a taper of 3 degrees whereas modular stem B has a taper of 2 degrees. Radiologic assessment compared x-rays at two time points: immediately post-surgery and most recent x-ray available at a minimum follow up of two years. Leg length discrepancy, subsidence and postoperative bi cortical contact was assessed. Descriptive summary statistics calculated clinical factors (i.e. age, gender, Paprosky classification). 122 arthroplasties were completed. Complete data was available for 112. Revisions were carried out for Paprovski grade 3a/ 3b femoral deficits. Post-operative bi-cortical contact of the proximal stem < 20mm was associated with higher subsidence rates (P = 0.047). Subsidence rates for implant A and B system were 4.27mm (0.12–25.62mm) and 3.43 mm (0.3–11.1 mm) respectively. Significant subsidence was noted in 9.8% (n=8) in implant A and 5.2%(n=2) in implant B. We conclude that immediate postoperative bi-cortical stem contact of <20mm was associated with significantly higher subsidence rates in this study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, short shaped stem becomes popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Advantages of the short stem are preserving femoral bone stock, thought to be less thigh pain, suitable for minimally invasive THA. However, bony reaction around the short stem has not been well known. The purpose of this study was to compare the two years difference of radiographic change around the standard tapered round stem with the shorter tapered round stem.

Objective

Cement thickness of at least 2 mm is generally associated with more favorable results for the femoral component in cemented hip arthroplasty. However, French-designed stems have shown favorable outcomes even with thin cement mantle. The biomechanical behaviors of a French stem, Charnley-Marcel-Kerboull (CMK) and cement were researched in this study.

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects.

Several studies at our institution have compared modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In 2 studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a match cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems.

As mentioned, one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction.

Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction, more recently, at our institution, we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with a monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems.

Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice.

Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done with a endofemoral approach. In this approach the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this stem more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem.

In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases.

Dorr bone type is both a qualitative and quantitative classification. Qualitatively on x-rays the cortical thickness determines the ABC type. The cortical thickness is best judged on a lateral x-ray and the focus is on the posterior cortex. In Type A bone it is a thick convex structure (posterior fin of bone) that can force the tip of the tapered implant anteriorly – which then displaces the femoral head posteriorly into relative retroversion. Fractures in DAA hips have had increased fractures in Type A bone because of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch (metaphysis is bigger than diaphysis in relation to stem size). Quantitatively, Type B bone has osteoclastic erosion of the posterior fin which proceeds from proximal to distal and is characterised by flattening of the fin, and erosive cysts in it from osteoclasts. A tapered stem works well in this bone type, and the bone cells respond positively. Type C bone has loss of the entire posterior fin (stove pipe bone), and the osteoblast function at a low level with dominance of osteoclasts. Type C is also progressive and is worse when both the lateral and AP views show a stove pipe shape. If just the lateral x-ray has thin cortices, and the AP has a tapered thickness of the cortex a non-cemented stem will work, but there is a higher risk for fracture because of weak bone. At surgery Type C bone has “mushy” cancellous bone compared to the hard structure of type A. Tapered stems have high risk for loosening because the diaphysis is bigger than the metaphysis (opposite of Type A). Fully coated rod type stems fix well, but have a high incidence of stress shielding. Cemented fixation is done by surgeons for Type C bone to avoid fracture, and insure a comfortable hip. The large size stem often required to fit Type C bone causes an adverse-stem-bone ratio which can cause chronic thigh pain. I cement patients over age 70 with Type C bone which is most common in women over that age

Background

A stem sitting proud (SP) or that above the final rasp position remains in some patients who undergo hip replacement using proximally coated tapered wedge stems. Surgeons may face challenges providing the best fit due to unpredictable stem seating. Zimmer Inc. introduced a new rasp to solve this issue but the clinical results of this rasp have not yet been published. Therefore, we aimed to address the following: 1) What is SP incidence using a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem? 2) Does the new rasp system improve seating height? 3) What are the risk factors of SP?

Modular tapered stems have become increasingly popular in femoral revisions and stem subsidence remains a reported clinical problem. Computer modeling and biomechanical testing demonstrated a minimum initial line-to-line fit of 25 mm was required to reduce the risk of subsidence. We examined XR imaging of 110 consecutive femoral revisions by a single surgeon using two different modular tapered stems to determine if this biomechanical threshold was of clinical relevance. 72% of the revisions were done for aseptic loosening and 28% for periprosthetic fracture or infection. Stem subsidence of any degree was observed in 24 (21.8%), while 12 (10.9%) demonstrated substantial subsidence of > 10 mm. We matched this cohort to 12 patients who had no stem subsidence. The average age of patients with subsidence was 59 years (43 to 79 years). The average of patients without subsidence was 66 years (41 to 77 years). Each group had 7 men and 5 women. Stem subsidence was observed in the first 3 months post-surgery. The demographics, bone deficiency, stem design, and stem diameter were similar between groups.

83% of patients with substantial stem subsidence had less than 25 mm of line-to-line fit compared to 17% of patients without subsidence. The 12 cases of no stem subsidence had a mean line-to-line fit of 48 mm (25 to 55 mm). 75% of patients with substantial stem subsidence had also undergone an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) compared to 33% of patients without subsidence.

We conclude that there is a positive correlation with the biomechanical testing parameters and substantial stem subsidence. ETO was found to be associated with higher stem subsidence.

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects.

Several studies at our institution have compared the modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In 2 studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a match cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems.

As mentioned one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post-revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction.

Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction more recently at our institution we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems.

Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice.

Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done with an endofemoral approach. In this the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this stem more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem.

In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases.

Background and aim. Recent proposals have been introduced to modify stem design and/or femoral fixation in total hip replacement (THR). New designs need to consider previous design features and their results. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of six different designs of tapered uncemented stems implanted in our Institution. Methods. 1918 uncemented hips were prospectively assessed from 1999 to 2011 (minimum follow-up of five years for the unrevised hips). All hips had a 28 or 32 mm femoral head and metal-on-polyethylene or alumina-on-alumina bearing surface. Six uncemented femoral designs that shared a femoral tapered stem incorporating a coating surface were included in the study. The different design features included the type of coating, metaphyseal filling, and sectional shape. Results. Intra-operative proximal femoral crack was 6.7% in one of the designs (p=0.01), univariate analysis showing a lower risk of crack in the other designs. The position of the stem was neutral in 80% of the cases for all designs. Femoral canal filing was related to the stem design (p<0.001 at the three levels) and to the femoral level assessed (subset alpha=0.005). Twelve stems were revised for aseptic loosening (6 from two different designs). The survival rate for femoral aseptic loosening at 15 years was 96.6% (95% CI 93.8 to 99.4) for one of these two designs ad 97.4% (95% CI95.5 to 99.6) for the other. Regression analysis showed that stem design was the only factor related to aseptic loosening when adjusted for femoral canal filling (at the three levels) stem position (neutral or not) and femoral type (cylindrical or not). Conclusion. Tapered uncemented stems consistently provide excellent bone fixation. New designs need to avoid changing successful features and concentrate on the less successful aspects

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the short stem has become popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The advantages of the short stem are that it preserves femoral bone stock, possibly results in less thigh pain, and is suitable for minimally invasive THA. However, because of the short stem, malposition may happen during surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the stem alignment, which was measured by CT, between the standard tapered round stem and the shorter tapered round stem.

Introduction

Cementless tapered wedge stems have shown excellent results over the last decade. Distal potting with inadequate proximal fit, as well as failure to achieve biologic fixation has led to thigh pain, loosening and implant failure. To support a variety of patient morphologies a novel tapered wedge stem was designed with reduced distal morphology, maximizing the proximal contact of the grit blasted surface. The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of this stem design.

Introduction

Dysplastic hip has not only deficiency of acetabulum but also femoral deformity. Therefore, selection of stem is important in cementless THA for dysplasia. Especially using of short stem should be challenge for deformed femur. We studied clinical performance and radiological findings after THA with triple tapered short stem (Optimys hip) for dysplastic hip.

Aims

We report on the outcome of the Synergy cementless femoral stem with a minimum follow-up of 15 years (15 to 17).

Three basic design concepts of cementless femoral fixation have emerged. They include: anatomic designs, straight stem designs, and tapered designs. In addition, there have been modular designs. The most successful have been designs that have a metaphyseal sleeve with a tapered stem. A more recent newer concept has been the double taper neck designs which have not performed well in general. Anatomic Stem Designs: The rationale for an anatomic stem design was to design a component that matched the sagittal plane bow of the femur. The APR (Centerpulse, Austin, Texas) and the PCA (Howmedica, Rutherford, New Jersey) were the initial designs. Although these designs provided excellent micromotion stability, they are not used in their present length today because they could not fit in to all femurs. Straight Stem Designs: The concept of a straight stem design was to machine the femur to accept the prosthesis. This was done with diaphyseal reaming, proximal broaching, and preparing a proximal triangle to accommodate the proximal metaphyseal portion of the stem. These had previously, and still do, come in proximally coated and distally coated designs. They have proven to be durable long term. The AML fully coated stem (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana) was and still is the prototype device. Tapered Stem Designs: The most popular designs today are the tapered stems. They are inserted either by a broach only, or ream and broach technique. Some only taper in the ML plane and are flat in the AP plane. These are called ML taper or blade devices (Taperloc and Trilock). These are usually inserted broach only. Some have a double taper with proximal fill and include the Zweymuller stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana), the Omnifit stem (Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey), the Summit stem, and the Corail stem (both DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana). Some are hydroxyapatite coated (Omnifit and Corail), some are porous coated (Summit), and some are only grit blasted (Zweymuller). Some are broach only including the Zweymuller and Corail, and some are broach and ream including the Omnifit and Summit. Some are tapered throughout, one of which is a Wagner type design, Trilogy (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana). These Wagner type devices are useful in abnormal anatomy (CDH and Perthes). Modular Stem and Dual Modular Neck Designs: Metaphyseal sleeve modular stem designs are extremely versatile and can be inserted press fit into just about any femoral anatomy. They are most commonly utilised in cases of hip dysplasia with marked femoral anteversion. The S-ROM device is the prototype design. The long term concern with these as well as the double neck tapered devices is fretting and corrosion at the extra modular junctions. Short Stem Designs: Short stem designs were developed to provide metaphyseal only fixation and to enable easy insertion through small incision techniques, especially those performed through anterior and antero-lateral approaches