The June 2024 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Proximal femoral unicameral bone cysts: is ESIN the answer?; Hybrid-mesh casts in the conservative management of paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial; Rate and risk factors for contralateral slippage in adolescents treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis; CRP predicts the need to escalate care after initial debridement for musculoskeletal infection; Genu valgum in paediatric patients presenting with patellofemoral instability; Nusinersen therapy changed the natural course of spinal muscular atrophy type 1: what about spine and hip?; The necessity of ulnar nerve exploration and translocation in open reduction of medial humeral epicondyle fractures in children.

The April 2024 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360. looks at: Ultrasonography or radiography for suspected paediatric distal forearm fractures?; Implant density in scoliosis: an important variable?; Gait after paediatric femoral shaft fracture treated with intramedullary nail fixation: a longitudinal prospective study; The opioid dilemma: navigating pain management for children’s bone fractures; 12- to 20-year follow-up of Dega acetabuloplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip; Physeal fractures of the distal ulna: incidence and risk factors for premature growth arrest; Analysis of growth after transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children; Management of lateral condyle humeral fracture associated with elbow dislocation in children: a retrospective international multicentre cohort study

Aims

The outcome following the development of neurological complications after corrective surgery for scoliosis varies from full recovery to a permanent deficit. This study aimed to assess the prognosis and recovery of major neurological deficits in these patients, and to determine the risk factors for non-recovery, at a minimum follow-up of two years.

Aims. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the correction achieved using a convex pedicle screw technique and a low implant density achieved using periapical concave-sided screws and a high implant density. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome between the two techniques. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed a series of 51 patients with a thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There were 26 patients in the convex pedicle screw group who had screws implanted periapically (Group 2) and a control group of 25 patients with bilateral pedicle screws (Group 1). The patients’ charts were reviewed and pre- and postoperative radiographs evaluated. Postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded. Results. The number of implants (14.5 vs 17.1) and the implant density (1.5 vs 1.9) were significantly lower in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Operating time was 27 minutes shorter in Group 2 than in Group 1, with a mean of 217 minutes (SD 50.5; 120 to 346). The duration of surgery per instrumented vertebra was reduced by 19% in Group 2 (p = 0.011). No statistical difference was found in the postoperative Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, the relative correction achieved, or postoperative PROMs. Conclusion. Despite a lower implant density and achieving correction through a convex rod, surgical correction of the Cobb angle and vertebral body rotation was similar in both groups. Periapical pedicle screws and primary correction on the concave side do not seem to be mandatory in order to achieve good surgical results in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. The operating time was shorter in the group with lower implant density. In conclusion, the technique provided good results and has the potential to reduce complications and costs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):536–541

Aims

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and analyze the trends of surgeon-reported complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) over a 13-year period from the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Morbidity and Mortality database.

Aims

It is uncertain whether instrumented spinal fixation in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis should finish at L5 or be extended to the pelvis. Pelvic fixation has been shown to be associated with up to 30% complication rates, but is regarded by some as the standard for correction of deformity in these conditions. The incidence of failure when comparing the most caudal level of instrumentation, either L5 or the pelvis, using all-pedicle screw instrumentation has not previously been reported. In this retrospective study, we compared nonambulatory patients undergoing surgery at two centres: one that routinely instrumented to L5 and the other to the pelvis.

Objectives

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) have a higher incidence with cementless stems. The highest incidence among various cementless stem types was observed with double-wedged stems. Short stems have been introduced as a bone-preserving alternative with a higher incidence of PFF in some studies. The purpose of this study was a direct load-to-failure comparison of a double-wedged cementless stem and a short cementless stem in a cadaveric fracture model.

Aims. There is little information about the optimum number of implants to be used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish spine register was undertaken to discover whether more implants per operated vertebra (implant density) leads to a better outcome in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. The hypothesis was that implant density is not associated with patient-reported outcomes, the correction of the curve or the rate of reoperation. Patients and Methods. A total of 328 patients with idiopathic scoliosis, aged between ten and 20 years at the time of surgery, were identified in the Swedish spine register (Swespine) and had patient reported outcomes including the Scoliosis Research Society 22r instrument (SRS-22r) score, EuroQol 5 dimensions quality of life, 3 level (EQ-5D-3L) score and a Viual Analogue Score (VAS) for back pain, at a mean follow-up of 3.1 years and reoperation data at a mean follow-up of 5.5 years. Implant data and the correction of the curve were assessed from radiographs, preoperatively and a mean of 1.9 years postoperatively. The patients were divided into tertiles based on implant density. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, logistic regression or log-rank test. Some analyses were adjusted for gender, age at the time of surgery, the flexibility of the major curve and follow-up. Results. The mean number of implants per operated vertebra in the low, medium and high-density groups were 1.36 (1.00 to 1.54), 1.65 (1.55 to 1.75) and 1.91 (1.77 to 2.00), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the correction of the curve, the SRS-22r total score, EQ-5D-3L index or number of reoperations between the groups (all p > 0.34). In the SRS-22r domains, self-image was marginally higher in the medium implant density group (p = 0.029) and satisfaction marginally higher in the high implant density group (p = 0.034). Conclusion. These findings suggest that there is no clear advantage in using a high number of implants per operated vertebra in the surgical treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1080–6

Aims. We present the results of correcting a double or triple curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a convex segmental pedicle screw technique. Patients and Methods. We reviewed 191 patients with a mean age at surgery of 15 years (11 to 23.3). Pedicle screws were placed at the convexity of each curve. Concave screws were inserted at one or two cephalad levels and two caudal levels. The mean operating time was 183 minutes (132 to 276) and the mean blood loss 0.22% of the total blood volume (0.08% to 0.4%). Multimodal monitoring remained stable throughout the operation. The mean hospital stay was 6.8 days (5 to 15). Results. The mean post-operative follow-up was 5.8 years (2.5 to 9.5). There were no neurological complications, deep wound infection, obvious nonunion or need for revision surgery. Upper thoracic scoliosis was corrected by a mean 68.2% (38% to 48%, p < 0.001). Main thoracic scoliosis was corrected by a mean 71% (43.5% to 8.9%, p < 0.001). Lumbar scoliosis was corrected by a mean 72.3% (41% to 90%, p < 0.001). No patient lost more than 3° of correction at follow-up. The thoracic kyphosis improved by 13.1° (-21° to 49°, p < 0.001); the lumbar lordosis remained unchanged (p = 0.58). Coronal imbalance was corrected by a mean 98% (0% to 100%, p < 0.001). Sagittal imbalance was corrected by a mean 96% (20% to 100%, p < 0.001). The Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire score improved from a mean 3.6 to 4.6 (2.4 to 4, p < 0.001); patient satisfaction was a mean 4.9 (4.8 to 5). . Conclusions. This technique carries low neurological and vascular risks because the screws are placed in the pedicles of the convex side of the curve, away from the spinal cord, cauda equina and the aorta. A low implant density (pedicle screw density 1.2, when a density of 2 represents placement of pedicle screws bilaterally at every instrumented segment) achieved satisfactory correction of the scoliosis, an improved thoracic kyphosis and normal global sagittal balance. Both patient satisfaction and functional outcomes were excellent. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1080–7

Increasing health care costs, limited resources and increased demand makes cost-effective and cost-efficient delivery of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) management paramount. Rising implant costs in deformity surgery have prompted justification of high implant density. The objective of this study was to analyse the costs of thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery, comparing initial learning curve costs with those of the established technique and to the costs involved in posterior instrumented fusion from the literature. 189 consecutive cases from April 2000 to July 2011 were assessed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up using a prospective database covering perioperative factors, clinical and radiological outcomes, complications and patient-reported outcomes. The patients were divided into three groups to allow comparison; 1. A learning curve cohort, 2. An intermediate cohort and 3. A third cohort using our established technique. Hospital finance records and implant manufacturer figures were corrected to 2013 costs. A literature review of AIS management costs and implant density in similar curve types was performed. The mean pre-op Cobb angle was 53°(95%CI 0.4) and was corrected postop to mean 22.9°(CI 0.4). The overall complication rate was 20.6%, primarily in the first cohort, with a rate of 5.6% in the third cohort. The average total costs were $46,732, operating room costs of $10,301 (22.0%) and ICU costs of $4620 (9.8%). The mean number of screws placed was 7.1 (CI 0.04) with a single rod used for each case giving average implant costs of $14,004 (29.9%). Comparison of the three groups revealed higher implant costs as the technique evolved to that in use today, from $13,049 in Group 1 to $14577 in Group 3 (P<0.001). Conversely operating room costs reduced from $10,621 in Group 1 to $7573 (P<0.001) in Group 3. ICU stay was reduced from an average of 1.2 to 0 days. In-patient stay was significantly (P=0.006) lower in Groups 2 and 3 (5.4 days) than Group 1 (5.9 days). Our thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis correction has evolved to include an increase in levels fused and reduction in complication rate. Implant costs have risen, however, there has been a concurrent decrease in those costs generated by operating room use, ICU and in-patient stay with increasing experience. Literature review of equivalent curve types treated posteriorly shows similar perioperative factors but higher implant density, 69–83% compared to the 50% in this study. Thoracoscopic Scoliosis surgery presents a low density, reliable, efficient and effective option for selected curves

The current trend in kyphosis correction is for “every level” instrumentation to achieve intraoperative stability, correction, fusion and implant longevity. We evaluate the medium term follow up of a low implant density (LID) construct. All patients with adolescent kyphosis (idiopathic or Scheurmann's) on our deformity database were identified. Radiographs and records were analysed for neurological complications, correction and revision. The constructs included were all pedicle screw anchors with multiple apical chevron osteotomies and a proximal and distal “box” of 6 to 8 screws. A four rod cantilever reduction manoeuvre with side to side connectors completed the construct. Kyphosis for any other cause was excluded. Follow up less than 12 months was excluded. 23 patients were identified with an average follow up 27 months (72 to 12 months) and a mean implant density of 1.1 (53.5% of “available” pedicles instrumented). There was 1 false positive neurophysiological event without sequelae (4%). There were no proximal junctional failures (0%). There were no pseudarthroses or rod breakages (0%). There was 1 loss of distal rod capture (early set screw failure) (4%). This was revised uneventfully. There were 4 infections requiring debridement (early series). Average initial correction was 44% (77.7 degrees to 43.5 degrees) with a 1% loss of correction at final follow up (43.5 to 44.0 degrees). The fulcrum bending correction index was 107% (based on fulcrum extension radiographs). 85% of curves had a fulcrum flexibility of less than 50%. The average cost saving compared to “every level “instrumentation was £5700 per case. This paper shows that a LID construct for kyphosis has technical outcomes as good as high density constructs. The obvious limitation of the study is the small number of patients in the cohort. The infection rates have improved with changes to perioperative process in the later series of patients. We do not believe these are a consequence of the construct itself

Aim:. The introduction of novel systems for correction of scoliosis should be subject to critical analysis and based on patient benefit. Methods:. Retrospective analysis of prospective data from a single surgeon consecutive series of Lenke 1 type curves. The two cohorts compared K2M and AOUSS2. Pre and Post operation Cobb angle, flexibility, absolute correction rate, implant related correction, levels fused, implant density, implant cost and cost per Cobb improvement analysis were collected. Results:. A total of 26 patients were analysed, 13 in each group. Both groups were similar in pre-operative parameters. The mean age was 14.62 and 14.23 respectively. The mean pre-operation Cobb angle was 71 (96–53) K2M and 70 (85–56) AOUSS2 bending to 45 in each. The flexibility was similar as was the correction in both. Post op Cobb 28 (42–16) K2M and Cobb 28 (44–16) AOUSS2. The implant density and number of screws used was similar. The average cost per construct was £6554 for K2M and £6140 AOUSS2. Discussion:. Using these simple and immediate outcome measures and a grossly simplified cost analysis there was a cost difference of £5382 with no measurable clinical advantage or disadvantage in curves of similar flexibility. The cost per case is determined by implant density and curve flexibility. In the least complex of scoliosis cases there needs to be evidence of benefit to justify the increased resource allocation in a health care system that is not fiscally driven. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

Aim:. To evaluate the effect of a stiffer rod in normalising thoracic hypokyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods:. A retrospective review of AIS cases performed at our institution was carried out. In order to reduce variability, the analysis included only Lenke 1 cases which had all pedicle screw constructs, with similar constructs and implant density. Cases that underwent anterior release were excluded. All cases had the same implant (Expedium 5.5, Depuy-Synthes, Raynham, USA). The rod material differed in that some cases had 5.5 titanium, whilst others had 5.5 cobalt chrome. The preoperative and postoperative sagittal Cobb angle was measured. Results:. 35 patients met the inclusion criteria. 15 had titanium rods and 20 had cobalt chrome rods. The mean fulcrum correction index was similar between groups. The preoperative coronal and sagittal Cobb was similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative sagittal Cobb between the two groups (ANOVA one way test). Discussion:. Despite the theoretical advantage of a stiffer construct improving the sagittal profile in AIS, this study identified no such benefit despite closely matching the two groups. All pedicle screw constructs do not seem to improve the sagittal profile despite the use of a stiffer rod. Conflict of interest:. Depuy-Synthes fund a fellow in this unit. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

INTRODUCTION:. Clinical densitometry studies indicate that following TKR implantation there is loss of bone mineral density in regions around the implant. Bone density below the tibial tray has been reported to decrease 36% at eight years after TKR. This bone loss (∼5%/year) is substantially greater than osteoporosis patients in the same age group (∼1–2%/year) and could contribute the loss of mechanical support provided by the peri-implant leading to loosening of components in the long term. High patient mass and body mass index have also been implicated in increased loosening rates, and was thought to be due to high stress or strain on the tibial constructs. These findings suggest that peri-implant bone strain may be affected by time in service and patient factors such as body mass. The goal of this project was to assess the proximal tibial bone strain with biomechanical loading using en bloc retrieved TKR tibial components. Note that the implants were not obtained from revision surgery for a loose implant, but rather after death; thus the implants can be considered to be successful for the lifetime of the patient. We asked two research questions, guided by the clinical and laboratory observations: (1) are the peri-implant bone strain magnitudes for cemented tibial components greater for implants with more time in service and from older donors?, (2) is tibial bone strain greater for constructs from donors with high body weight and lower peri-implant BMD?. METHODS:. Twenty-one human knees with cemented total knee replacements were obtained from the SUNY Upstate Medical University Anatomical Gift Program. Clinical bone density scans were obtained of the proximal tibia in the anterior-posterior direction. Axial loads (1 body weight, 60/40% medial to lateral) were applied to the tibia through the contact patches identified on the polyethylene inserts. Strain measures were made using a non-contacting 3-D digital image correlation (DIC) system. Strain was measured over six regions of the bone surface (anterior (A), posterior (P), medial (M), lateral (L), postero-medial (PM), postero-lateral (PL)) (Figure 1). RESULTS:. For a donor population of 54 to 90 years (78 ave) with 0 to 22 years in service (ave 9 years), the peri-implant bone strains ranged from 119 to 791 ue. Maximum strains exceeded 3000 ue. Peri-implant bone strains were greater for implants with more time in service (p = 0.044), but not age of the donor (p = 0.333) (Figure 2). Peri-implant bone strains were greater for donors with greater mass (p = 0.028) and lower bone density (p = 0.0039) (Figure 3). DISCUSSION:. To the authors knowledge, these results show for the first time (using cemented tibial components) that bone remodeling after in-vivo service does not result in constant bone strain as would be expected for ‘homeostatic’ strain conditions. Even though loading was applied based on body weight, heavier donors had higher bone strains. Donors with more time in service also had higher bone strains. Combined, these results suggest that the supporting bone stock could diminish in some patients to the point at which bone failure occurs resulting in component migration

We reviewed 212 consecutive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis using all pedicle screw instrumentation in terms of clinical, radiological and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 outcomes. In Group 1 (51 patients), the correction was performed over two rods using bilateral segmental pedicle screws. In Group 2 (161 patients), the correction was performed over one rod using unilateral segmental pedicle screws with the second ^{rod providing stability of the construct through two-level screw fixation at proximal and distal ends. The mean age at surgery was 14.8 years in both groups. Comparison between groups showed no significant differences with regard to age and Risser grade at surgery, pre- and post-operative scoliosis angle, coronal Cobb correction, length of hospital stay and SRS scores. Correction of upper thoracic curves was significantly better in Group 1 (p = 0.02). Increased surgical time and intra-operative blood loss was recorded in Group 1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively). The implant cost was reduced by mean 35% in Group 2 due to the lesser number of pedicle screws.}

Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw techniques have both achieved excellent deformity correction in adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis, which was maintained at two-year follow-up. This has been associated with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates.

Purpose of the study. To compare the effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw techniques in correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screw constructs have been extensively used in the treatment of adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis. It has been suggested that greater implant density may achieve better deformity correction. However, this can increase the neurological risk related to pedicle screw placement, prolong surgical time and blood loss and result in higher instrumentation cost. Methods. We reviewed the medical notes and radiographs of 139 consecutive adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis (128 female-11 male, prospectively collected single surgeon's series). We measured the scoliosis, thoracic kyphosis (T5-T12), and lumbar lordosis (L1-L5) before and after surgery, as well as at minimum 2-year follow-up. SRS 22 data was available for all patients. Results. All patients underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis using pedicle screw constructs. Mean age at surgery was 14.5 years. We had 2 separate groups: in Group 1 (43 patients) correction was performed over 2 rods using bilateral segmental pedicle screws; in Group 2 (96 patients) correction was performed over 1 rod using unilateral segmental pedicle screws with the 2. nd. rod providing stability of the construct through 2-level screw fixation both proximal and distal. Group 1. Mean Cobb angle before surgery for upper thoracic curves was 37°. This was corrected by 71% to mean 11° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for main thoracic curves was 65°. This was corrected by 71% to mean 20° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for thoracolumbar/lumbar curves was 60°. This was corrected by 74% to mean 16° (p<0.001). No patient lost >2° correction at follow-up. Mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 24° and lumbar lordosis 52°. Mean postoperative thoracic kyphosis was 21° and lumbar lordosis 50° (p>0.05). Mean theatre time was 5.5 hours, hospital stay 8.2 days and intraoperative blood loss 0.6 blood volumes. Complications: 1 transient IOM loss/no neurological deficit; 1 deep wound infection leading to non-union and requiring revision surgery; 1 rod trimming due to prominent upper end. Mean preoperative SRS 22 score was 3.9; this improved to 4.5 at follow-up (p<0.001). Pain and self-image demonstrated significant improvement (p=0.001, p<0.001 respectively) with mean satisfaction rate 4.9. Group 2. Mean Cobb angle before surgery for upper thoracic curves was 42°. This was corrected by 52% to mean 20° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for main thoracic curves was 62°. This was corrected by 70% to mean 19° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for thoracolumbar/lumbar curves was 57°. This was corrected by 72% to mean 16° (p<0.001). No patient lost >2° correction at follow-up. Preoperative scoliosis size for all types of curves correlated with increased surgical time (r=0.6, 0.4). Mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 28° and lumbar lordosis 46°. Mean postoperative thoracic kyphosis was 25° and lumbar lordosis 45° (p>0.05). Mean theatre time was 4.2 hours, hospital stay 8.4 days and intraoperative blood loss 0.4 blood volumes. Complications: 1 deep and 1 superficial wound infections treated with debridement; 1 transient brachial plexus neurapraxia; 1 SMA syndrome. Mean preoperative SRS 22 score was 3.7; this improved to 4.5 at follow-up (p<0.001). Pain, function, self-image and mental health demonstrated significant improvement (p<0.001 for all parameters) with mean satisfaction rate 4.8. Comparison between groups showed no significant difference in regard to age at surgery, preoperative and postoperative scoliosis angle for main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, as well as SRS scores and length of hospital stay. Better correction of upper thoracic curves was achieved in Group 1 (p<0.05), but upper thoracic curves in Group 2 were statistically more severe before surgery (p<0.05). Increased surgical time and blood loss was recorded in Group 1 (p<0.05, p=0.05 respectively). The implant cost was reduced by mean 35% in Group 2 due to lesser number of pedicle screws. Conclusion. Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation has achieved excellent deformity correction in adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis, which was maintained at follow-up. This has been associated with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates. The unilateral technique using segmental pedicle screw correction has reduced surgical time, intraoperative blood loss and implant cost without compromising surgical outcome for the most common thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. The bilateral technique achieved better correction of upper thoracic scoliosis

Introduction. Thoracic pedicle screws have been proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the effect of the instrumentation alloy has not yet been investigated. We aimed to compare segmental versus non segmental thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation in patients with AIS. Methods. A consecutive series of 143 patients with AIS (Lenke classification 1–4) surgically treated from 1998 to 2005 by means of thoracic pedicle screws were retrospectively reviewed. Considering implant density (number of fixation anchors placed per available anchors sites; segmental =60% [S], non-segmental =60% [NS]) and implant alloy used (titanium [Ti] vs stainless steel [SS]) we divided the cohort into four groups: Ti-S (48 cases); Ti-NS (34 cases); SS-S (35 cases); and SS-NS (26 cases). Groups were similar for preoperative mean age, sex distribution, Risser sign, main thoracic curve, and thoracic kyphosis. Pearson correlation coefficient and univariate analysis of variance were used. Results. At a mean follow-up of 6·2 years (range 3–10) the overall final main thoracic curve correction was a mean of 61·4% (20–89), whereas the implant density within the major curve was 71% (15–100%). We recorded a significant correlation between implant density and percentage major curve correction (r=0·41, p<0·002); when the four groups were compared we noted that the SS-S group showed the greatest average correction (75%), followed by the Ti-S, SS-NS, and Ti-NS groups. We detected no significant differences between SS-S versus Ti-S versus SS-NS (r=0·002, p>0·05; r=0·13, p>0·05; r=0·07, p>0·01, respectively), whereas the Ti-NS group showed a statistically significant inferior percentage correction when compared with all other groups (average 52%; p<0·001). Nevertheless, no significant difference between groups was recorded on the SRS-30 assessment, showing a postoperative improvement in both self-image and satisfaction. Conclusions. When an SS instrumentation is used, non-segmental pedicle screw constructs seem to be equally effective as segmental instrumentations in obtaining satisfactory results in patients with main thoracic AIS. When the implant alloy used is titanium, an implant density of greater than 60% should be guaranteed so as to achieve similar results to those recorded in this study