Introduction: Ronald McRae’s textbook clinical orthopaedic examination mentions “Capasso’s method. 1. of evaluation of coronal plane deformity to be the most sensitive tool of measuring cobb angle. However there is no study to date evaluating/comparing this method against popular & widely used tools viz. cobbometer and traditional protractor. Objectives: To evaluate Capasso’s method against commonly used measurement aids w.r.t measurement of cobb angle in scoliosis. Summary of background data: Studies of Cobb method of measurement have multiple sources of error and intra & inter-observer variability. The Capasso’s method which is based on “bi-uni-vocal principle” views the scoliosis curve to be an arc of circumference and to be a true reflection of angular values and hence geometrically more valid. Methods: 24 scoliosis curves were measured by three different examiners on three separate occasions one week apart by 1) Capasso’s method 2) Cobbometer and 3) Traditional protractor on same set of hard copies of digital x-rays. The three set of Cobb angle readings obtained were statistically analysed for intra & inter-observer reliability and assessed for agreement between the three methods of clinical measurement. Results: The mean intra observer variability for protractor, cobbometer & Capasso’s methods were 8.50, 5.50 10.00 respectively. The cobb angle readings obtained by Capas-so’s method was higher than the other two methods for all magnitudes of the curves (< 300, 300–600 & > 600) and was more than two times the conventional readings for curves < 300. The disagreement between Capasso’s method with either of the other two methods (cobbometer & protractor) was statistically significant (p< 0.01). Discussion: This study demonstrates that Capasso’s method significantly overestimates the magnitude of scoliotic deformity esp. for curves < 300 as compared to other existing popular measurement tools. Surgical decision making if were to be based on it would invite criticism and wrath. The present existing methods have their own limitations and the need of the day is a simple three dimensional measuring system to accurately define the magnitude of the deformity

Purpose. This study aims to identify factors that influence the Cobb angle at presentation to a tertiary referral scoliosis centre, and the outcome of the referrals. Methods. 81 consecutive patients referred were reviewed retrospectively. Hospital database, clinic letters and radiographs were examined. Patient demographics, mode of referral (GP vs. tertiary), severity and type of scoliosis were recorded. The season of referral was defined as ‘warm’ between months of June and September, and ‘cold’ between November and March. Cobb angle measurements were made independently on digital radiographs by 2 Orthopaedic trainees. Results. There were 60 females and 21 males referred. Of these patients, 31 (38%) were offered surgery. The overall mean Cobb angle was 43° (SD 22.5°), where the surgical group was 58° (SD 20°) and the non-surgical group was 33° (SD 18°), p < 0.05. The mean age of the patients for surgery was 22, compared to 19 in the non-operative group (p < 0.05). There was no significant influence of sex, season of referral, and mode of referral on operations offered. Males had a higher mean Cobb angle (52°) than female (39°) with marginal significance (p = 0.09). Advancing age correlated with increasing Cobb angle (r = 0.2, p = 0.09) with marginal significance. No other factors influenced the presenting Cobb angle. There was excellent inter-observer agreement in the Cobb angle measurements (α = 0.99). Conclusion. High Cobb angle and age were the only significant predictors for requirement of surgery in a tertiary referral scoliosis centre. Secondary or tertiary referral did not influence the severity or the outcome of patients with scoliosis. This may imply that GP direct referrals to scoliosis centres are sufficient, especially if Cobb angle measurements and age are included in the criteria. Seasonal differences in scoliosis presentation were not found, however further comparison can be made with countries with warmer climate to demonstrate the cosmetic influence. Ethics Approval: none. Interest Statement: none

Introduction: Accurate and quantitative measurements of the spine are essential for deformity diagnosis and assessment of curve progression. There is much concern related to the multiple exposures to ionizing radiation associated with the Cobb method of radiographic measurement, currently the standard procedure for diagnosis and follow-up of the progression of scoliosis. In addition, the Cobb method relies on two-dimensional analysis of a three-dimensional deformity. The Ortelius800TM aims to provide a radiation-free method for scoliosis assessment in three planes (coronal, sagittal, apical) with simultaneous automatic calculation of the Cobb angle in both coronal and sagittal views. This new device is based on direct measurement of the position of the tips of the spinous processes in space. A low intensity electromagnetic field records the spatial position of a sensor attached to the examiner’s finger while palpating the patient’s spinous processes. This study investigates the correlation of spinal deformity measurements with Ortelius800TM radiation-free system as compared to standard radiographic measured Cobb angles in order to assess Ortelius800TM clinical value while enabling a significant reduction of x-ray exposure. Methods: 124 patients diagnosed with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) from four different medical centers were measured with the Ortelius800TM system using the same standard protocol. The entire process required an average of 2 minutes. The Ortelius800TM measurements were correlated with the standard Cobb angle as measured on routine standing coronal and sagittal radiographs. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for matched pair measurements. The mean difference and the absolute mean difference between measurements with the two methods was estimated. Results: Standing full-spine coronal radiographs were obtained for each patient. Radiograph analysis for these 124 patients revealed 249 deformity measurements. The deformity measurements were comprised of 142 thoracic curves with a mean of 18.3° and 107 lumbar curves with a mean of 17.4°. Lateral radiographs were obtained from 38 patients with a mean of 36.1°. Correlation between Cobb angles measured manually on standard erect posteroanterior radiographs and those calculated by this new technique showed an absolute difference between the measurements to be significantly less than +\−5° for coronal measurements and significantly less than +\−6° for sagittal measurements indicating good correlation between the two methods. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between deformity angles obtained by the two methods was highly significant (0.86) with a P value < 0.0001. The measurements from four independent sites were not significantly different. Discussion: The results reveal good correlation between the two measuring methods in both coronal and sagittal views. We propose the Ortelius800TM as a clinical tool for the routine follow-up measurements of AIS patients, thus enabling a significant reduction of radiation exposure

Purpose of the study. To establish the relation between the magnitude of the deformity in scoliosis, measured by cobb angle on radiograph & Volumetric asymmetry with the ISIS2 surface topography, and the patient perception of self image and mental health, measured with SRS-22 scores. Methodology. A total of 89 untreated patients with scoliosis were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, cobb angle measurement of radiograph and surface topography performed on the same day along with SRS-22 questionnaires. The cobb angle was measured by single surgeon using a digital PACS system, who was unaware of the volumetric asymmetry score. Volumetric asymmetry was measured by ISIS2 surface topography performed by a research nurse who was unaware of the cobb angle. Volumetric asymmetry was calculated using standard ISIS2 software. A comparison correlation of SRS scores for function, pain, self image and mental health against cobb angle and volumetric asymmetry was undertaken by clinical scientist. Scores for patient satisfaction to treatment was excluded as these were untreated patients. Statistical analysis was performed using cor. test on software R. Results. Correlation of both cobb angle and volumetric asymmetry for function and pain were statistically not significant (p value > 0.05). However for self image, correlation was statistically significant with cobb angle (p value-0.0033) and volumetric asymmetry (p value-0.00031), but the correlation was not high. Cobb angle contributed only around 10% to self image, whilst volumetric asymmetry contributed only 14%. Similarly for mental health, correlation was statistically significant with cobb angle (p value-0.0194) and volumetric asymmetry (p value-0.00559), but the correlation was not high. Cobb angle contributed only around 6.2% to mental health, whilst volumetric asymmetry contributed only 8.6%. Conclusion. Volumetric asymmetry correlates better to both mental health and self image as compared to cobb angle, but the correlation is still poor. Neither cobb angle or volumetric asymmetry can be used to predict patients self image or mental health. We are pursuing this study further to look at other parameters which may affect SRS-22 such as gender, age, type of deformity, waist asymmetry and shoulder asymmetry. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

Objective: Axially loaded MRI simulates imaging of the lumbar spine in the standing position and is useful in the assessment of spinal stenosis[. 1. ]. This study determines the ability of axially loaded spinal MRI to assess Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Design: Prospective study. Newly diagnosed patients with idiopathic scoliosis were referred for MRI of the whole spine. Cobb angle measurements were made from erect AP spinal radiographs prior to MRI. Coronal MR images of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine were obtained prior to and following loading of the spine in an MR compatible compression device (Dynawell). Cobb angle measurements were made on unloaded and loaded MRI studies using the same reference points as on radiographs. Radiographic and MRI Cobb angle measurements were compared. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Subjects: Five patients, all females with mean age 14 years (range 12–16 years) were included in the study. Outcome Measures: Six curves were compared on pre-referral erect radiographs, unloaded and loaded MRI studies, 2 in the thoracic region and 4 in the thoracolumbar region. Results: Curve characteristics and Cobb angle measurement on radiographs vs. axial unloaded and loaded MRI were as follows: Curve 1; T4-T12, 45°, 36° and 41°. Curve 2; T10-L4, 52°, 22° and 30°. Curve 3; T10-L4, 45°, 36° and 38°. Curve 4; T6-T10, 42°, 22° and 22°. Curve 5; T11-L3, 43°, 32° and 43°. Curve 6; T11-L3, 34°, 11° and 31°. Conclusions: Axial loading increases MRI Cobb angle measurements compared to unloaded studies. Initial results suggest that axial loaded MRI using the Dynawell Compression device may allow comparative measurement of Cobb angle to erect radiographs in the thoracolumbar region, but not in the thoracic region. This is likely related to the loading characteristics of the compression device, which is designed to concentrate loading in the lumbar region. Modification to include loading of the thoracic spine may improve results. The technique has the potential to replace radiography and thus reduce radiation burden to young adolescents with some types of idiopathic scoliosis

Introduction: Capasso’s method(CM) has been described in orthopaedic textbooks to be the most sensitive tool for measuring Cobb angle in scoliosis. This method based on “bi-univocal principle” views the scoliosis curve to be an arc of circumference, to be a true reflection of angular values and hence geometrically more valid. However there is no comparative study between the established measurement tools i.e. Oxford cobbometer(OC) & Traditional protractor(TP) vs. CM. Our objectives were to to evaluate the sensitivity of CM against OC & TP in scoliosis and to determine intra & inter-observer reliability of the three methods. Methods: Three independent blinded observers measured 24 digital AP radiographs of scoliosis on three separate occasions one week apart by CM, OC & TP. The three sets of readings obtained were statistically analysed for intra-observer (Cronbach’s alpha) & inter-observer [Inter-class correlation coefficient(ICC)] reliability. Results: The mean Cobb angle measured by OC was 42.4(r13-91), by TP was 45.1(r16-89) and by CM was 70.4(r 20-148). The cronbach’s was 0.94 for OC, 0.91 for TP & 0.88 for CM. The ICC was 0.96 for OC, 0.90 for TP & 0.71 for CM. The measurements obtained by CM were higher than the other two methods for all magnitudes of the curves. Conclusion: CM based on sound geometric principles is perceived to be superior to Cobb angle and has reasonable correlation(Pearson’s®=0.74) with it. However CM overestimates the magnitude of scoliosis as compared to other standard measurement tools. Management decisions based on CM would be inappropriate by current guidelines. Ethics approval: Not applicable Interest Statement: None

The purpose of this study was to establish the a)feasibility, b) reproducibility of spinal Quantec scans (a non-intrusive surface topography system) and c) the validity of the Quantec Q-angle against Cobb angles from spinal radiographs, in non-ambulant children with cerebral palsy (CP). Eighteen non-ambulant children (aged 5–11 years) with CP had successful clinical, radiological and Quantec assessment of their spine while seated in a supportive seating system. Scoliosis incidence was 72%, Cobb angles ranged from 1–73° (mean 18.2°). Quantec scanning was feasible with appropriate postural support. Mean interobserver differences were 0.5 ± 5.8° (median 1.3°, 5 / 95th percentiles lying at −7.3 / 8.5° respectively). Mean differences between Cobb and Q-angle were 0.02 ± 6.2° (median 1.0°, with 5 / 95th percentiles lying at −8.2 / 7.7° respectively). Surface topography may be used to safely monitor the spine for non-ambulant CP children. Results show similar or improved trends to previous comparisons with idiopathic scoliosis. Ovadia (2007) showed an interobserver mean difference of 6.3 ± 4.9° using an Ortelius800TM system. Thometz (2000) showed mean differences between Cobb and Q-angle ranging from 1.1–12.6 ± 4.9–10.2°. Further research is needed for the user group described in this study with larger spinal curves. Ethics approval: Ethics approval granted by Leeds (West) Research Ethics Committee. COREC number: 08/H1307/22. Interest Statement: None

Introduction. There is no consensus among scoliosis surgeons on which surface topography method and parameters may be used as an alternative to serial radiography to monitor scoliosis progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-correlation among surface rotation (4-D formetric II) with 3-D Quantec scan and 2-D cobb's angle measurements for assessing torso asymmetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Materials & Methods. A prospective cohort of consecutive 24 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was accrued from the departmental scoliosis surface topography database. This group comprised of conservatively treated, Spinecor brace treated and postoperative patients in order to assess the wider utility and validity of 2 different surface topography methods (Formetric II & Quantec Spinal Imaging System). Parameters assessed were Q-angle, Suzuki hump sum, Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index (POTSI), surface rotation (rms), surface rotation (max) and maximum Cobb's angle on concurrently done scoliograms. Results. There were 3 male and 21 female patients (87.5%) at a mean age of 14.1 years (range, 10-20 years). Maximum Cobb's angle ranged from 9 degrees to 80 degrees. There was a significant correlation between Cobb angle (mean-35.1°) and Q-angle (mean-21.8°). Scatter plot and regression analysis showed a linear relationship between surface rotation (mean-9.9 root mean square) and POTSI (mean-42.5) as well as Q-angle. Suzuki hump sum was a less reliable parameter. Conclusions. Formimetric scans showed a linear correlation and reproducibility in patients with AIS receiving conservative treatment for smaller magnitude curves, when compared to Quantec scan. Due to ease of use, colourful and multi-mode representation of spinal deformity, Formetric may have an edge of preference for better clinic consultation to patient/parental appreciation of cosmetic issues and gain following treatment

Thoracic hyperkyphosis (TH – Cobb angle >40°) is correlated with rotator cuff arthropathy and associated with anterior tilting and protraction of scapula, impacting the glenoid orientation and the surrounding musculature. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a reliable surgical treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and recent literature suggests that patients with TH may have comparable range of motion after RTSA. However, there exists no study reporting the possible link between patient-reported outcomes, humeral retroversion and TH after RTSA. While the risk of post-operative complications such as instability, hardware loosening, scapular notching, and prosthetic infection are low, we hypothesize that it is critical to optimize the biomechanical parameters through proper implant positioning and understanding patient-specific scapular and thoracic anatomy to improve surgical outcomes in this subset of patients with TH. Patients treated with primary RTSA at an academic hospital in 2018 were reviewed for a two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no pre-existing chest radiographs for Cobb angle measurement, change in post-operative functional status as a result of trauma or medical comorbidities, and missing component placement and parameter information in the operative note. As most patients did not have a pre-operative chest radiograph, only seven patients with a Cobb angle equal to or greater than 40° were eligible. Chart reviews were completed to determine indications for RTSA, hardware positioning parameters such as inferior tilting, humeral stem retroversion, glenosphere size/location, and baseplate size. Clinical data following surgery included review of radiographs and complications. Follow-up in all patients were to a period of two years. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score was used for patient-reported functional and pain outcomes. The average age of the patients at the time of RTSA was 71 years old, with six female patients and one male patient. The indication for RTSA was primarily rotator cuff arthropathy. Possible correlation between Cobb angle and humeral retroversion was noted, whereby, Cobb angle greater than 40° matched with humeral retroversion greater than 30°, and resulted in significantly higher ASES scores. Two patients with mean Cobb angle of 50° and mean humeral retroversion 37.5° had mean ASES scores of 92.5. Five patients who received mean humeral retroversion of 30° had mean lower ASES scores of 63.7 (p < 0 .05). There was no significant correlation with glenosphere size or position, baseplate size, degree of inferior tilting or lateralization. Patient-reported outcomes have not been reported in RTSA patients with TH. In this case series, we observed that humeral stem retroversion greater than 30° may be correlated with less post-operative pain and greater patient satisfaction in patients with TH. Further clinical studies are needed to understanding the biomechanical relationship between RTSA, humeral retroversion and TH to optimize patient outcomes

Primary care physicians rely on radiology reports to confirm a scoliosis diagnosis and inform the need for spine specialist referral. In turn, spine specialists use these reports for triage decisions and planning of care. To be a valid predictor of disease and management, radiographic evaluation should include frontal and lateral views of the spine and a complete view of the pelvis, leading to accurate Cobb angle measurements and Risser staging. The study objectives were to determine 1) the adequacy of index images to inform treatment decisions at initial consultation by generating a score and 2) the utility of index radiology reports for appropriate triage decisions, by comparing reports to corresponding images. We conducted a retrospective chart and radiographic review including all idiopathic scoliosis patients seen for initial consultation, aged three to 18 years, between January 1-April 30, 2021. A score was generated based on the adequacy of index images to provide accurate Cobb angle measurements and determine skeletal maturity (view of full spine, coronal=two, lateral=one, pelvis=one, ribcage=one). Index images were considered inadequate if repeat imaging was necessary. Comparisons were made between index radiology report, associated imaging, and new imaging if obtained at initial consultation. Major discrepancies were defined by inter-reader difference >15°, discordant Risser staging, or inaccuracies that led to inappropriate triage decisions. Location of index imaging, hospital versus community-based private clinic, was evaluated as a risk factor for inadequate or discrepant imaging. There were 94 patients reviewed with 79% (n=74) requiring repeat imaging at initial consultation, of which 74% (n=55) were due to insufficient quality and/or visualization of the sagittal profile, pelvis or ribcage. Of index images available for review at initial consult (n=80), 41.2% scored five out of five and 32.5% scored two or below. New imaging showed that 50.0% of those patients had not been triaged appropriately, compared to 18.2% of patients with a full score. Comparing index radiology reports to initial visit evaluation with <60 days between imaging (n=49), discrepancies in Cobb angle were found in 24.5% (95% CI 14.6, 38.1) of patients, with 18.4% (95% CI 10.0, 31.4) categorized as major discrepancies. Risser stage was reported in only 14% of index radiology reports. In 13.8% (n=13) of the total cohort, surgical or brace treatment was recommended when not predicted based on index radiology report. Repeat radiograph (p=0.001, OR=8.38) and discrepancies (p=0.02, OR=7.96) were increased when index imaging was obtained at community-based private clinic compared to at a hospital. Re-evaluation of available index imaging demonstrated that 24.6% (95% CI 15.2, 37.1) of Cobb angles were mis-reported by six to 21 degrees. Most pre-referral paediatric spine radiographs are inadequate for idiopathic scoliosis evaluation. Standardization of spine imaging and reporting should improve measurement accuracy, facilitate triage and decrease unnecessary radiation exposure

There is a need for non-radiographic, objective outcome measures for children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Standing balance and stability is altered in children with AIS. The Margin of Stability (MoS) has been used to compare gait stability in clinical populations. Our objective was to compare the MoS in anterior-posterior (MoS. AP. ) and mediolateral (MoS. ML. ) directions in girls with AIS to Controls. Girls with AIS and healthy girls walked at three speeds on an instrumented treadmill wearing retroreflective markers, surrounded by motion capture cameras. The MoS. AP/ML. was calculated at left and right heel strike. Data was processed in Visual 3D. A two-way ANOVA was used to compare MoS. AP/ML. between group, speed and the interaction between group and speed. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to compare the MoS to Cobb angle. Statistical significance was accepted when p > 0.05. A priori power analysis suggested 12 participants per group. Three Cases and four Controls were recruited. Girls with AIS all had right-sided main thoracic curves (Lenke type 1a, 61.3° ± 10.0°). MoS. AP. was significantly bigger for Cases compared to Controls on the left (p=0.038) and right foot (p=0.041). There was no significant difference between Cases and Controls for MoS. ML. , but there was a visual trend for a smaller MoS. ML. in Cases. There was no significant difference for speed or the interaction between group and speed for MoS. AP. or MoS. ML. In Cases, MoS. AP. increased with increasing Cobb angle on the left (r. 2. =0.687, p=0.054) and right (r. 2. =0.634, p=0.067) and MoS. ML. decreased with increasing Cobb angle on the left (r. 2. =-0.912, p=0.002). Further subjects are being recruited. Girls with Lenke type 1a AIS are more stable in the AP direction and less stable in the ML direction than Controls during treadmill walking. AP stability increases and ML stability decreases with increasing Cobb angle. This research suggests that the MoS could be used as an outcome measure for children with AIS. Continued work is required to increase the power of this study. Further work could consider these changes during walking overground, measuring an MoS or MoS-like measure using a wearable device, and in different curve types

The purpose of this study is to evaluate risk factors for distal construct failure (DCF) in posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We observed an increased rate of DCF when the pedicle screw in the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was not parallel to the superior endplate of the LIV, however this has not been well studied in the literature. We hypothesise a more inferiorly angled LIV screw predisposes to failure and aim to find the critical angle that predisposes to failure. A retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent PSIF for AIS at the Starship Hospital spine unit from 2010 to 2020. On a lateral radiograph, the angle between the superior endplate of the LIV was measured against its pedicle screw trajectory. Data on demographics, Cobb angle, Lenke classification, instrumentation density, rod protrusion from the most inferior screw, implants and reasons for revision were collected. Of 256 patients, 10.9% (28) required at least one revision. The rate of DCF was 4.6% of all cases (12 of 260) and 25.7% of revisions were due to DCF. The mean trajectory angle of DCF patients compared to all others was 13.3° (95%CI 9.2° to 17.4°) vs 7.6° (7° to 8.2°), p=0.0002. The critical angle established is 11°, p=0.0076. Lenke 5 and C curves, lower preoperative Cobb angle, titanium only rod constructs and one surgeon had higher failure rates than their counterparts. 9.6% of rods protruding less than 3mm from its distal screw disengaged. We conclude excessive inferior trajectory of the LIV screw increases the rate of DCF and a screw trajectory greater than 11° predisposes to failure. This is one factor that can be controlled by the surgeon intraoperatively and by avoiding malposition of the LIV screw, a quarter of revisions can potentially be eliminated

Success treating AIS with bracing is related to time worn and scoliosis severity. Temperature monitoring can help patients comply with their orthotic prescription. Routinely collected temperature data from the start of first brace treatment was reviewed for 14 patients. All were female with an average age of 12.4 years (range 10.3–14.6) and average 49o Cobb angle (30–64). Our current service recommendation is brace wear for 20 hours a day. Patients complied with this prescription 38.0% of the time, with four patients averaging this or more. Average brace wear was 16.3 hours per day (3.5–22.2). There were 13 patients who had completed brace treatment. The majority had surgery (7/13; 54%) or were considering surgery (1/13; 8%). There were 5 who did not wish surgery at discharge (5/13; 38%); 1 achieved a 40o Cobb angle, with 4 larger (53o;53o;54o;68o). The Bracing in AIS Trial (BrAIST) study measured “success” as less than a 50o Cobb angle, so using this metric our cohort has had a single “success”. Temperature monitors allowed an analysis of when patients were achieving their brace wear. When comparing daywear (8am-8pm) to nightwear (8pm-8am), patients wore their brace an average of 7.6 hours a day (2.5–11.2) and 8.7 hours a night (0.4–11.5). We conclude the minority of our patients comply with our current 20 hour orthotic prescription. The “success” of brace treatment is lower than comparison studies despite higher average compliance but starting with a larger scoliosis. Brace wear is achieved during both the day and night

We present a large single surgeon case series evaluation of a new growth guidance technique for the treatment of progressive early onset scoliosis (EOS). A traditional Luque trolley construct uses wires to hold growth guidance rods together. We describe a new technique that uses domino end to side connectors in place of the wires with the aim of providing a stronger construct to better limit curve progression, while allowing longitudinal growth. We did a thorough retrospective review of patient records and radiological imaging. Sequential measurements of Cobb angle and length of rods were recorded, as well as any further surgical procedures and associated complications. This enabled us to quantify the ability of a technique to limit curve progression and simultaneously allow growth of the construct. In total, 28 patients with EOS (20 idiopathic, four syndromic, and four neuromuscular) have been treated with this technique, 25 of whom have a minimum follow-up of 2 years and 13 have a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The average correction of the preoperative Cobb angle was 48.9%. At the 2-year follow up, the average loss of this initial correction was 15 degrees, rising to only 20 degrees at a minimum of 5 years (including four patients with a follow-up of 8 years or more). The growth of the constructs was limited. The average growth at 2 years was 3.7 mm, rising to 19 mm at the 5-year follow-up. Patients who underwent surgery with this technique before the age of 8 years seemed to do better. This group had a revision rate of only 18% at an average time of 7 years after the index procedure, and the average growth was 22 mm. However, the group that had index surgery after the age of 8 years had a 64% revision rate at an average of 3.2 years after surgery and an average growth of only 11.6 mm. Overall, in the cases series, there were four hardware failures (14%) and one deep infection (3.5%), and only ten patients (36%) had one extra surgery after the index procedure. Only two of the 13 patients who are at a follow-up of 5 years or more have had revision. This modified Luque trolley technique has a good capacity for initial curve correction and for limiting further curve progression, with limited longitudinal growth before 2 years and improved growth thereafter. This technique might not be so useful after the age of 8 years because of poor growth and a higher early revision rate. We have also demonstrated a low cost technique with a low hardware failure rate that saves many future surgeries for the patient compared with other techniques used in the treatment of EOS

Introduction. Monitoring of scoliosis is traditionally done with radiographs, which can be associated with an increased risk of cancer secondary to multiple exposures over many years. This study investigated whether the findings from surface topography can be used to monitor scoliosis curves and how much this method affects outcome scores in patients with scoliosis. This study therefore had two subsets: (1) to investigate whether lateral asymmetry (LA) from ISIS2 surface topography can predict radiographic Cobb angle, providing an alternative non-invasive means of monitoring patients with scoliosis (LA and Cobb subset); and (2) to establish the relationships between the magnitude of the deformity in scoliosis, measured by Cobb angle on radiograph and volumetric asymmetry (VA) with the ISIS2 surface topography, and the patient perception of self-image and mental health, measured with SRS-22 scores (Cobb, VA, and SRS subset). Methods. In the LA and Cobb subset, 72 untreated patients with scoliosis (77 curves) with a Cobb angle of 55° or less were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, Cobb angle measurement taken from a standard radiograph, and surface topography done on the same day. A comparison of Cobb angle and LA was done. In the Cobb, VA, and SRS subset, 89 untreated patients with scoliosis were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, Cobb angle measurement of radiograph, and surface topography done on the same day along with SRS-22 questionnaires. A comparison correlation of SRS scores for function, pain, self-image, and mental health against Cobb angle and VA was undertaken. All statistical analysis was done with software R. Results. In the LA and Cobb subset, for Cobb angle less than 55° on radiograph, ISIS2 was able to predict the Cobb angle within 13°. In the VA, Cobb, and SRS subset, Cobb angle contributed only about 10% to self-image, whereas VA contributed 14%. Cobb angle contributed about 6·2% to mental health, whereas VA contributed 8·6%. Conclusions. Cobb angles display poor reliability, with estimates ranging from 3° to 10°. Even so, the 95% CIs on the prediction of Cobb angle from ISIS2 LA are too wide to use it alone to monitor spinal curvature. Whether or not LA is capable of monitoring change in curvature will be investigated as more longitudinal data are built up. VA correlates better with both mental health and self-image than does Cobb angle, but the correlation is still poor. Neither Cobb angle nor VA can be used to predict patient's self-image or mental health. We are pursuing this study further to look at other parameters that may affect SRS-22 such as sex, age, type of deformity, waist asymmetry, and shoulder asymmetry

Introduction and Objective. The treatment of severe deformities often requiring aggressive techniques such as vertebral resection and osteotomies with high comorbidity. To mitigate this risk, several methods have been used to achieve a partial reduction of stiff curves. The objective of this study was to evaluate and quantify the effectiveness of the Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction (HGT) in the Treatment of Severe Spinal Deformity in Children. Materials and Methods. A historical cohort of consecutive childs with severe spinal deformity who underwent to a perioperative HGT as a part of the treatment protocol. Minimum follow-up of 2 years. Demographic, clinical and radiological data, including time duration of perioperative HGT and Cobb angle in the coronal and sagittal plane. The radiological variables were measured before the placement of the halo, after placement of the halo, at the end of the period of traction, after surgery and in the final follow-up. Results. Seventeen males (57%) and twenty females (43%) were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 6.5 years (SD 4.8). The most frequent etiology for the spinal deformity was syndromic (13 patients). The average preoperative Cobb angle was 88º (range, 12–135). HGT was used in 17 cases prior to a primary surgery and in 20 cases prior to a revision surgery. After the HGT, an average correction of 34% of the deformity was achieved (p <0.05). After the surgery this correction improved. At 2-year follow-up there was a correction loss of 20% (p <0.05). There were 3 complications (8.1%): 2 pin infections and cervical subluxation. Conclusions. The application of HGT in cases of severe rigid deformity is useful allowing a correction of the preoperative deformity of 34%, facilitating surgery. Preoperative HGT seems to be a safe and effective intervention in pediatric patients with high degree deformity

Purpose of the study. Monitoring of scoliosis is traditionally done with radiographs which can be associated with an increased risk of cancer secondary to multiple exposures over many years. This study investigates whether lateral asymmetry (LA) from ISIS2 surface topography can predict radiographic cobb angle, to provide an alternative non- invasive means of monitoring scoliosis patients. Methods. A total of 72 untreated patients with scoliosis (77 curves) with a Cobb angle of 55 degrees or less were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, cobb angle measurement taken from a standard radiograph and surface topography done on the same day. The cobb angle were measured by single surgeon using digital PACS system. The surgeon was unaware of the LA score. Lateral asymmetry was measured using ISIS2 surface topography done by a research nurse who was also unaware of the cobb angle as previously described. Lateral asymmetry was calculated using the standard ISIS2 software. A comparison of cobb angle and LA was performed. Linear regression analysis was performed to define an equation predicting Cobb from LA. The predicted Cobb angles were then compared with the measured radiographic Cobb angles using Bland-Altman analysis. All statistical analysis was carried out using R. Results. The regression equation is: Predicted Cobb = 1.04∗LA + 9.972 with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.85 for Cobb angles less than 55 degrees. Bland-Altman analysis of the difference between radiographic Cobb and predicted Cobb from LA gave a mean difference of 0.08 degrees, standard deviation of 6.71 degrees and 95% limits of agreement of −13.3 to 13.5 degrees. For cobb angle less than 55 degrees on radiograph, ISIS2 was able to predict the cobb angle within 13 degrees. Conclusion. Cobb angles themselves display poor reliability, estimates ranging from 3 degrees to 10 degrees. Even so, the 95% confidence limits on the prediction of Cobb angle from ISIS2 LA are too wide to use it alone for monitoring spinal curvature. Whether or not LA is capable of monitoring change in curvature will be investigated as more longitudinal data is built up. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

The current study aims to find the role of Enhance Recovery Pathway (ERP) as a multidisciplinary approach aimed to expedite rapid recovery, reduce LOS, and minimize morbidity associated with Non Fusion Anterior Scoliosis Correction (NFASC) surgery. A retrospective analysis of 35 AIS patients who underwent NFASC with Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 curves with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up was done. Patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative analgesia, mobilization, length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction survey score with respect to information and care, and 90 days complications were collected. The cohort included 34 females and 1 male with a mean age of 15.2 years at the time of surgery. There were 16 Lenke 1 and 19 Lenke 5 in the study. Mean preoperative major thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb's angle were 52˚±7.6˚ and 51˚±4.5˚ respectively. Average blood loss and surgical time were 102 ±6.4 ml and 168 ± 10.2 mins respectively. Average time to commencing solid food was 6.5±1.5 hrs. Average time to mobilization following surgery was 15.5± 4.3 hrs. The average duration to the stopping of the epidural was 42.5±3.5 hrs. The average dose of opioid consumption intraoperatively was 600.5±100.5 mcg of fentanyl i.v. and 12.5±4.5 mg morphine i.v. Postoperatively opioids were administered via an epidural catheter at a dose of 2 mg of morphine every 24 hours up to 2 days and an infusion of 2mcg/hr of fentanyl along with 0.12-0.15% ropivacaine. The average duration to transition to oral analgesia was 55.5±8.5 hrs .20 patients had urinary catheter and the average time to removal of the catheter was 17.5±1.4 hrs. 25 patients had a chest tube and the average time to remove of chest tube was 25.5±3.2 hrs. The average length of hospital stay was 3.1±0.5 days. No patient had postoperative ileus or requirement of blood transfusion or any other complications. No correlation was found between LOS and initial cobb angle. The application of ERP in AIS patients undergoing NFASC results in reduced LOS and indirectly the cost, reduced post-operative opioid use, and overall improve patient satisfaction score

Aim:. To review the use of traction x-rays under anaesthesia in Late Onset Scoliosis to correlate traction x-ray flexibility and postoperative correction using posterior nonsegmental all pedicle screw constructs. Methods:. Prospective study. Preoperative anteroposterior, lateral and side bending x-rays were done and Cobb angles were measured. Intraoperatively, traction anteroposterior x-rays were taken under anaesthesia and Cobb angles were measured. All patients underwent nonsegmental posterior all pedicle screw construct correction using Biomet implants. Cobb angles greater than 60 degees were included in the study. Calculations were done including correction rate, traction flexibility and traction correction index. Results were entered onto an excel spreadsheet and analyzed using Statistica software. Results:. 16 patients were studied, 3 boys and 13 girls, average age 14, ranging from 8 to 17 years. Preoperative Cobb angles were mean 82 (60 to 105) degrees. Traction x-rays mean Cobb angle was 42 degrees with mean traction flexibility rate 49%. Mean correction rate was 65% and mean traction correction index 106. Preoperative Cobb angles correlated with traction flexibility with a p value of 0.01. Traction x-rays Cobb angle correlated with the traction correction index (p = 0.003), postoperative x-rays (p = 0.000) and also with correction rate (p = 0.024). There was no correlation between preoperative Cobb angle and correction rate. Conclusion:. Traction x-rays under anaesthesia in late onset scoliosis are a good predictor of postoperative correction with posterior nonsegmental all pedicle screw constructs in curves greater than 60 degrees

Background. Partial facetectomies with pedicle screw instrumentation is widespread and a well described technique for achieving posterior correction of scoliosis. Newton et al. first described the use of the UBS in the posterior correction of AIS in 2014. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the UBSPO in achieving posterior correction in Type1 AIS as compared to the traditional partial facetectomies. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of USBPO in achieving posterior correction in Type 1 AIS as compared to partial facetectomies. Methods. A retrospective review of 40 patients with type 1 AIS who had undergone a posterior correction of scoliosis between 2010 and 2016 was performed. Group A (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients that had partial facetectomies while Group B (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients having UBSPO. Both groups were matched for demographic parameters. Pre and post-operative radiographic parameters and operative data in both groups were compared. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. Results. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, magnitude of curves, apical rotation and flexibility on the preop imaging. There was a significant difference between the mean postop Cobb angle (21.9° vs 9.8°, p<0.0005), correction (63.04% vs 84.3%, p<0.0005) and postop apical rotation (p = 0.008) in favour of the UBSPO group. At 2-year follow-up there was a statistically significant increase in the cobb angle in the facetectomy group (21.89° (immediate post op) Vs 24.64° P=0.033) and no such difference in the UBSPO group. There was no significant difference between surgical time (p = 0.536) and blood loss (p = 0.380). Conclusion. The use of the UBSPO for posterior release provides more effective correction in the coronal and axial planes than traditional partial facetectomies in type 1 AIS