Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 63
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Jun 2013
McNamara K

According to a report by Millennium Research Group in January 2011, the US orthopaedic extremity device market will generate over $4.6 billion in revenue by 2015. 1. With an ageing demographic and increasing demand for better quality of life into old age, there is clearly a commercial drive for the orthopaedic device community to develop new and innovative solutions to bone and joint problems. Devising such solutions is one thing; protecting them, so that research investment can be rewarded, is another. How is such protection achieved? The judicious use of intellectual property rights plays a key role, and this article aims to provide some information about the use of patents to protect innovation


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2015
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 1 | Pages 16 - 18
1 Feb 2015

The February 2015 Knee Roundup. 360 . looks at: Intra-operative sensors for knee balance; Mobile bearing no advantage; Death and knee replacement: a falling phenomenon; The swings and roundabouts of unicompartmental arthroplasty; Regulation, implants and innovation; The weight of arthroplasty responsibility!; BMI in arthroplasty


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 6 - 14
1 Jun 2013
Wallace WA

In the UK we have many surgeon inventors – surgeons who innovate and create new ways of doing things, who invent operations, who design new instruments to facilitate surgery or design new implants for using in patients. However truly successful surgeon inventors are a rare breed and they need to develop additional knowledge and skills during their career in order to push forward their devices and innovations. This article reviews my own experiences as a surgeon inventor and the highs and lows over the whole of my surgical career


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 3 | Pages 9 - 13
1 Jun 2014
Waterson HB Philips JRA Mandalia VI Toms AD

Mechanical alignment has been a fundamental tenet of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) since modern knee replacement surgery was developed in the 1970s. The objective of mechanical alignment was to infer the greatest biomechanical advantage to the implant to prevent early loosening and failure. Over the last 40 years a great deal of innovation in TKA technology has been focusing on how to more accurately achieve mechanical alignment. Recently the concept of mechanical alignment has been challenged, and other alignment philosophies are being explored with the intention of trying to improve patient outcomes following TKA. This article examines the evolution of the mechanical alignment concept and whether there are any viable alternatives


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 19 - 21
1 Aug 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 45 - 45
1 Jun 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 2 | Pages 45 - 45
1 Apr 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 3 - 7
1 Jun 2019
Patel NG Waterson HB Phillips JRA Toms AD


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 13 - 16
1 Jun 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 2 | Pages 31 - 33
1 Apr 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 4 | Pages 3 - 8
1 Aug 2018
White TO Carter TH


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 2 | Pages 16 - 18
1 Apr 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 1 | Pages 28 - 30
1 Feb 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 6 | Pages 39 - 40
1 Dec 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 1 | Pages 35 - 37
1 Feb 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 4 | Pages 36 - 38
1 Aug 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 3 | Pages 10 - 12
1 Jun 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 2 | Pages 12 - 15
1 Apr 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 6 | Pages 41 - 43
1 Dec 2017
Foy MA