We analysed the functional outcome (Oswestry Disability Index) after technically and radiologically successful lumbar fusion in 39 non-compensation seeking patients with chronic low back pain, who had a High Intensity Zone (HIZ) – positive MRI and subsequently underwent discography. The average follow-up was 33 months. The HIZ-positive, discogrampositive group was the only one with statistically significant improvement. The HIZ-positive, discogram-negative group had the worst outcome. Relying only on the HIZ fails to identify the group of patients who would have had negative discography at the same levels. Therefore the presence of HIZ alone should not dictate treatment plan without discography confirmation.
In a prospective non-randomised study, 28 patients underwent laparoscopic assisted transperitoneal anterior interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction with the BAK cage over a 3-year period. In laparoscopic group, there were significantly lower blood losses (P<
0. 005), operating times [P<
0. 05], analgesic requirements [P<
0. 05] and postoperative rehabilitation [P<
0. 05). 8 patients developed post-operative nerve root pain, 5 of which settled with nerve root blocks, and there was 1 case of donor site infection. Intraoperative complications included 1 CIA tear, 2 CIV tears and 3 open conversions [11%]. 6 cases [24%] required further surgery at a mean of 14 months [range 4–29 months]. 20 laparoscopic cases completed a subjective self-assessment score with 4 [20%] excellent results, 5 [25%] good, 2 [10%] fair, 8 [40%] same and 1 [5%] worse. The preoperative Visual Analogue Pain Score [VAPS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] were set at 100 for the purposes of analysing the results [n=number in brackets]: Results show an improvement in the overall pain and disability. However, at two years patients still continued with some 65% of symptoms. Laparoscopic assisted anterior spinal fusion with the BAK device is safe and reliable with advantages that include reduced operating time, blood loss, post-operative analgesia requirements and hospitalisation. However, the clinical outcome does not appear to give superior results to other implants and we question whether it use as a stand-alone device is sufficient and would recommend posterior stabilisation to confer improved mechanical stability.