OUTCOME OF ENDOSCOPIC FUSION WITH THE BAK CAGE

Abstract

In a prospective non-randomised study, 28 patients underwent laparoscopic assisted transperitoneal anterior interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction with the BAK cage over a 3-year period. In laparoscopic group, there were significantly lower blood losses (P< 0. 005), operating times [P< 0. 05], analgesic requirements [P< 0. 05] and postoperative rehabilitation [P< 0. 05). 8 patients developed post-operative nerve root pain, 5 of which settled with nerve root blocks, and there was 1 case of donor site infection. Intraoperative complications included 1 CIA tear, 2 CIV tears and 3 open conversions [11%]. 6 cases [24%] required further surgery at a mean of 14 months [range 4–29 months]. 20 laparoscopic cases completed a subjective self-assessment score with 4 [20%] excellent results, 5 [25%] good, 2 [10%] fair, 8 [40%] same and 1 [5%] worse.

The preoperative Visual Analogue Pain Score [VAPS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] were set at 100 for the purposes of analysing the results [n=number in brackets]:

Results show an improvement in the overall pain and disability. However, at two years patients still continued with some 65% of symptoms.

Laparoscopic assisted anterior spinal fusion with the BAK device is safe and reliable with advantages that include reduced operating time, blood loss, post-operative analgesia requirements and hospitalisation. However, the clinical outcome does not appear to give superior results to other implants and we question whether it use as a stand-alone device is sufficient and would recommend posterior stabilisation to confer improved mechanical stability.