It has been proposed that the amount of energy transferred to the bone during a high velocity projectile injury determines the extent of bony injury. We studied the validity of this theory Fresh rear skeletally mature deer femurs were subjected to progressively increasing velocity projectile injuries within a pneumatic ballistic chamber with non-deforming steel spheres capturing the energy transferred. Analysis of fracture severity was performed including micro computer tomography analysis of micro-fractures. The effect of projectile caliber size was then analyzed.

Characteristic fractures patterns were observed with fracture lines extending radially from the impact site, often propagating longitudinally along the sample. It was found that a greater energy transfer resulted in more severe fracture for a given projectile. However, fractures of differing severity were produced by different projectiles for similar energy transfer. Neither specific energy transfer nor energy density could explain this phenomenon.

Although energy transfer plays a role in ballistic fracture, it is not the sole determinant. Other factors such as contact surface area, projectile mass and angle of impact may need to be considered.

The Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign in transverse magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to discriminate well between selected patients with and without lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), but the performance of this new test, when used in a broad patient population, is not yet known (Barz et al. 2010).

We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients with suspected LSS from 2004–2006, before the sign had been described, to assess its association with health outcomes. Based on clinical and radiological diagnostics, patients had been treated with decompression surgery or conservative treatment (physical therapy, oral pain medication). Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to 24 month follow-up were compared between Sedimentation Sign positives and negatives in both treatment arms.

Of the 146 included patients (52% female, mean age 59 yrs), 71 underwent surgery. Baseline ODI in this treatment arm was 52%, the sign was positive in 44 patients (mean ODI improvement 25 points) and negative in 27 (ODI improvement 24), with no significant difference between groups. In the 75 patients of the conservative treatment arm, baseline ODI was 44%, the sign was negative in 45 (ODI improvement 17), and positive in 30 (ODI improvement 5). Here a positive sign was associated with a smaller ODI improvement compared with sign negatives (t-test, p=0.003).

This study allowed an unbiased clinical validation of the Sedimentation Sign by avoiding it influencing treatment selection. In the conservative treatment arm a positive sign identifies a group of patients who are less likely to benefit. In these cases, surgery might be effective; however, this needs confirmation in prospective studies.

Most people experience low back pain (LBP) at least once in their lifetime. A minority goes on to develop persistent LBP causing significant socioeconomic costs. Aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the progression of acute to persistent LBP at an early stage (Hilfiker et al. 2007).

Prospective inception cohort study of patients attending a health practitioner for their first episode of acute LBP or recurrent LBP after a pain free period of at least six months. Patients were assessed at baseline addressing occupational and psychological factors as well as pain, disability, quality of life and physical activity, and followed up over six months. Baseline and follow-up questionnaires were based on the recommendations of the Multinational Musculoskeletal Inception Cohort Study (MMICS) Statement (Pincus et al. 2008). Variables were combined to the three indices ‘working condition’, ‘depression and maladaptive cognitions’ and ‘pain and quality of life’.

The index ‘depression and maladaptive cognitions’ comprising of depression, somatisation, a resigned attitude towards the job, fear-avoidance, catastrophizing and negative expectations on return to work was found to be a significant baseline predictor for persistent LBP up to six months (OR 5.1; 95%CI 1.04–25.1). The diagnostic accuracy of the predictor model had a sensitivity of 0.54 and a specificity of 0.90. Positive likelihood ratio was moderate with 5.3, negative likelihood ratio 0.5. Overall predictive accuracy of the model was 81%. The area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the index was 0.78 (CI95% 0.65–0.92), demonstrating a satisfactory quality of discrimination.

Psychological factors in patients with acute LBP in a primary care setting correlated with a progression to persistent LBP up to six months. The benefit of including factors such as ‘depression and maladaptive cognition’ in screening tools is that these factors can be addressed in primary and secondary prevention.

Posterior lumbar fusion is a frequently performed procedure in spinal surgery. High percentages of good and excellent results are indicated by physicians. On the other hand patient-based outcomes are reported. Little is known about the correlations of these two assessment types. We aimed at their comparison.

The analysis included 1013 patients with degenerative spinal disease or spondylolisthesis from an international spine registry, treated with posterior lumbar fusion. All patients were pre/postop assessed by physician-based McNab criteria (‘excellent’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’). Of these patients, 210 (mean age 61 years; 57% females) were in addition assessed by patient-based Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The remaining 803 patients (mean age 59 years; 56% females) were assessed by patient-based Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI), including

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain as well as verbal self-rating (‘helped a lot’, ‘helped’, ‘helped only little’, ‘didn’t help’, ‘made things worse’). McNab criteria were compared to the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in ODI (12.8), in VAS back (1.2) and leg pain (1.6). We investigated the correlations between McNab criteria and these patient-based outcomes.

In the ‘excellent’ group as rated by physicians, the proposed MCID was reached in 83% of patients for ODI, in 69% for VAS back and in 83% for VAS leg pain. All patients said the treatment had ‘helped’ or ‘helped a lot’. In the ‘good’ group 56% (ODI), 66% (back pain) and 86% (leg pain) reached the MCID. 96% of patients perceived the treatment as positive. In the ‘fair’ group 37% (ODI), 55% (back pain) and 63% (leg pain) reached the MCID. 49% had positive treatment considerations. The ‘poor’ group revealed 30% (ODI), 35% (back pain) and 44% (leg pain) of patients with reached MCID. Only 15% rated the treatment as positive.

The Spearman correlation coefficients between McNab criteria on the one hand and ODI, back and leg pain as well as patients’ verbal self-rating on the other hand were 0.57, 0.37, 0.36 and 0.46 respectively.

The comparison of physician and patient-based outcomes showed the highest correlations between McNab criteria and ODI, somewhat weaker correlations with patients’ self-rating and the weakest correlations with back and leg pain. Based on these findings, physicians’ evaluation of patient outcomes can be considered a valuable part of patient assessment, corresponding very well with patients’ perceptions of success or failure of spinal surgery.

Statistics New Zealand states “Over the next five decades the 65+ dependency ratio is projected to more than double, from 18 (people aged 65+ years) per 100 (people aged 15 – 64 years) in 2006 to 45 per 100 in 2061. This means that for every person aged 65+ years, there will be 2.2 people in the working-age group in 2061, compared with 5.4 people in 2006 “. This will have a profound impact on health care, specifically in those fractures sustained by the elderly e.g. fractured neck of femur (#NOF).

Also at present little is proven regarding outcome following #NOF in the New Zealand population. These two factors (population change and patient outcome) led to disagreement and healthy debate at the 2008 NZOA ASM. After a pilot study in Dunedin we have examined national electronic records of 52,456 patients presenting with a first admission due to #NOF over the last 20 years.

The mean age at which a patient sustained their first #NOF was around 80 and 71% of these patients have since died. Approximately 10% of patients had a subsequent readmission for #NOF. There was a trend for increasing age over the last twenty years proportional to the increased average age of the general population. One year survival was 75% and mean survival was 3½ years with a third of patients living longer than six years. We found differences in outcome for gender and fracture type (intracapsular vs. extracapsular). Our patients also showed a trend to higher survival risk ratios (i.e. they are clinically “sicker” than they used to be). The incidence of #NOF has increased over the last 20 years with a projected doubling in the number of cases (to 5600 per year) at around 25yrs from now based on the most conservative estimates.

Introduction: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is diagnosed by a history of claudication, clinical investigation, treadmill test, and cross sectional area (CSA) in MRI or CT. Because commonly used radiological findings not always correlate with clinical symptoms, additional parameters with high specificity and sensitivity are needed.

Methods: Prospective study of dorsal lumbar nerve root sedimentation in MRI scans in supine position of 2 groups of 100 consecutive patients each between 01/2007 – 12/2007. Patients in group 1 had non-specific low back pain (LBP), no claudication, and a CSA above 120 mm2 (LBP group); patients in group 2 showed claudication with or without LBP and a CSA below 80 mm2 (LSS group). We excluded patients with a previous spine surgery. In addition to the sedimentation sign, in both groups VAS, ODI, and walking distance in the treadmill test were measured.

Results: The sedimentation sign was positive in 94 patients in the LSS group but in no patient in the LBP group, showing a specificity of 100%, a sensitivity of 94%, and an accuracy of 97%. There was no difference between segmental levels L1 – L5. Walking distance in the LSS group was shorter than in the LBP group (67 m vs. > 1000 m; p< 0.001). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding VAS and ODI.

Conclusion: In patients without LSS during MRI in supine position lumbar nerve roots sediment due to gravity to the dorsal part of the dural sac leading to a positive sedimentation sign. This sedimentation is not observed in patients with LSS. Therefore, a negative sedimentation sign is a predictor of LSS in patients without prior spine surgery with a high specificity and sensitivity. Level S1 and below were excluded in our study because nerve roots S1 and S2 leave the dural sac in a ventral position inhibiting sedimentation to the dorsal part of the dural sac. The sedimentation sign is a reliable additional diagnostic parameter in patients with LSS.

Background: context: Length of hospital stay (LOS) varies widely within patients with posterior spinal fusion. So far there is little evidence on its co-variates.

Purpose: This study examined which co-variates influence LOS in posterior spinal fusion. Study design: Prospective consecutive documentation of hospital based interventions in the international spine registry Spine Tango. Patient sample: Between 05/2005 and 11/2006 data of 3437 patients were documented in the registry. 790 patients with degenerative spinal disease (614) or spondylolisthesis (176), who had been treated with posterior decompression and spinal fusion, were included in this study. Median age was 62.8 yrs (min 13.2 yrs, max 89.8 yrs) with a female to male ratio of 2:1. Median LOS was 11 days (IQR 8–14 d). Outcome measures: LOS was chosen as dependent outcome variable.

Methods: Multiple linear regression was performed on following independent variables: age, gender, main pathology, number of spinal segments of posterior fusion, level of fusion, number of previous spinal surgeries, operation time, clinic (number of fusions, academic status), surgeon credentials, type of fusion (sole fusion, fusion + instrumentation, fusion + instrumentation + cage).

Results: Clinic (p< 0.0001) was found to be a highly significant co-variate for LOS (min 7 d, max 14 d). Number of fusions per clinic (min 25, max 434) and academic status of clinic had no influence on LOS. Further significant covariates were surgeon credentials (surgeons in training: 8.5 d, specialised spine surgeons: 11 d, orthopaedic or neurosurgeons: 12 d; p=0.001), number of spinal segments of posterior fusion (1 segment: 10 d, 2–3 segments: 12 d, 4–5 segments: 12.5 d, > 5 segments: 15 d; p=0.002), and age group (< 50 yrs: 9 d, 50–59 yrs: 11 d, 60–69 yrs: 12 d, ≥70 yrs: 13 d; p=0.01). Borderline significance was found for gender (women: 12 d, men: 10 d; p=0.05). All other variables showed no influence on LOS.

Conclusion: Co-variates of LOS of patients with posterior spinal fusion are clinic, independent of number of spinal surgeries per clinic and academic status of clinic, surgeon credentials, number of segments of fusion, age group, and gender. A short LOS in surgeries performed by surgeons in training is explained by a smaller number of segments of fusions in these procedures. A subgroup analysis on the co-variate clinic should be performed assessing further explanatory variables. However, this goes beyond the possibilities of documentation in a spine registry.

As an example of benchmarking in spinal surgery using Spine Tango, we extracted data on dural tears, one of the most frequent types of complications in posterior spinal fusion. Little is known about their predictors. This study examined which factors predict the occurrence of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion.

Prospective consecutive documentation of hospital based interventions with an evidence level 2++. Between May 2005 and November 2006 data of 3437 patients were documented in the registry. Nine hundred and twenty nine patients, who had been treated with posterior spinal fusion after opening of the spinal canal, were included in this study. Dural tears being the most frequent type of complications in the registry were chosen as dependent outcome variable. Multiple linear regression with stepwise elimination was performed on potential predictor-variables of the occurrence of dural tears. Benchmarking compared the performance of single hospitals with international peers. Median age was 62.7 years (min 12.5, max 90.5 yrs) with a female to male ratio of 2:1. In 18 of 929 cases a dural tear occurred. Hospital (p=0.02) and number of segments of fusion (p=0.018) were found to be predictors of the occurrence of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion. Number of fusions per hospital (min 25, max 526) and academic status of hospital had no influence on the rate of dural tears. Fusions of four and more segments showed an increase of the rate of dural tears by a factor of three compared to fusions of less than four segments. There was no significant difference between fusions of one segment and fusions of two or three segments (1.3 vs. 1.9%) as well as between fusions of four or five segments and fusions of more than five segments (4.6 vs. 4.2%). Differences between hospitals remained when benchmarking dural tears with case mix.

Predictors of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion are

hospital and

In fusions of four and more segments a threefold higher risk of dural tears in comparison to fusions of less than four segments should be taken into consideration.

We determined the survival of primary total hip and knee replacements and patients who had undergone surgery between 1989 and 2007 in Dunedin with the aim to using these figures to provide information on

whether our arthroplasty population is changing,

The initial search using records held by the audit department at Dunedin Hospital returned 6,328 patient records with total hip and knee arthroplasty between 1988 and 2007. These reports however, included many procedures which were neither hip/knee nor primary/revision total joint arthroplasty. The data was filtered, resulting in 4,773 hip and knee arthroplasties. The final data included 3194 primary total hip replacements and 1579 primary total knee replacements. Comorbidity scoring of these patients was also undertaken.

The mean age of patients who underwent primary hip replacement was 67.6 yrs (SD 12.4) and the mean age of patients who underwent a primary knee replacement was 70.8 yrs (SD 9.8). Around 25% of patients who have had a primary joint replacement died after a mean of 10 yrs after the operation. In the group of patients who died after 10 years, the mean age at surgery was around 74 years. The mean age at the time of death was around 80 years. No difference was found in the death rate, revision rate, and the combined outcomes with death or revision as the end point with respect to the following-THRs. TKR, the grade of the surgeon, the comorbidity score or in men vs. women as compared to the general population.

Patients over 59 years of age at time of primary arthroplasty have a > 90% chance of dying before the need for revision surgery. Patients of less than 51 years of age have a > 90% chance of requiring revision surgery. Patients of 55 years of age have a 50% chance of requiring revision surgery. In a setting of ongoing scarce resources symptomatic/questionnaire targeted follow-up with radiology may be the only long term viable solution.

Posterior lumbar fusion is one of the most frequent procedures in spinal surgery. This study examined which factors predict physician-based outcomes in posterior lumbar fusion within the international spine registry Spine Tango.

This study used prospective consecutive hospital based documentation. Between May 2005 and October 2007 720 patients had been treated with posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative disease or spondylolisthesis. McNab criteria as commonly used physician-based outcomes were chosen as dependent outcome variable. We dichotomised the original McNab criteria combining “excellent” with “good” to “good”, and “fair” with “poor” to “poor”. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on following potential predictor-variables: age, gender, main pathology, number of previous spinal surgeries, number of spinal segments of posterior fusion, operation time, surgeon credentials, follow-up interval.

Median age was 63 years (range 13–90 yrs) with a female to male ratio of 6.3:3.7. Number of previous spinal surgeries (p< 0.001) and follow-up interval (p< 0.001) were found to be predictors of the dichotomised McNab criteria. Patients without previous spinal surgery showed the highest ratio of “good” to “poor” outcome (80.5%:19.5%). This ratio was almost consistently decreasing with the number of previous spinal surgeries to 40%:60% in patients with more than five previous surgeries. At six and twelve-weeks follow-up outcomes were significantly better than after one year, without significant differences between other follow-up intervals. Other examined co-variables showed no influence on the outcomes.

Predictors of physician-based outcomes in posterior lumbar fusion are “number of previous spinal surgeries” and “follow-up interval”. In patients with more than five previous spinal surgeries a higher likelihood of “poor” outcomes should be taken into consideration. A too positive outcome may occur at six or twelve-week’s follow-up.

Introduction: With a life of over five years, Spine Tango can be considered the first truly International Spine Registry. The Swedish Spine Registry has already shown the feasibility of a registry on a national level. But, there is a need for an international spine registry allowing a benchmarking on an international level. Here we demonstrate the genesis of questionnaire development, the constantly increasing activity, and limitations of the International Spine Registry Spine Tango.

Methods: From 2002 until 2007 about 9000 datasets were submitted by 28 hospitals in nine countries worldwide. Three different generations of Spine Tango questionnaires were used for documentation.

Results: To cope with varying international administrative issues and legal requirements of data anonymisation, national Spine Tango modules are necessary. Four national Spine Tango modules are in operation to date, another three modules are in the process of roll-out. Considering all these participants, Spine Tango will soon expand to include data from 52 hospitals in 18 countries. One-fourth of these hospitals are University Hospitals, which are destined to take the lead in the Spine Tango registry as opinion leading hospitals. Although the number of participants is steadily growing, no country is yet represented with a sufficient number of hospitals. Indisputably, a marketing concept is needed. An acquisition of new centres via national spine societies seems an obvious strategic approach. Further limitations of Spine Tango include the low number and short duration of follow-ups and the lack of sufficiently detailed patient based data on subgroup level.

Discussion: Spine Tango has achieved a firm position as international spine registry and with its increasing acceptance it is also gaining importance. The strengths of Spine Tango include a potentially very large network, the participation of a specialized international society and an academic partner with expertise and extensive experience in registry implementation. Data analysis from Spine Tango is possible but complicated by the incompatibility of generations one and two with the more recent generation three. Consequently findings cannot yet be generalized to any specific country or patient population. Nevertheless, the potential benefits of the project for the whole spine community become increasingly visible. In the near future, the established Spine Tango version three with standardised patient based data will make outcome evaluations possible. In parallel to the International Spine Registry Spine Tango, a National Spine Registry in Australia could be set up – comparable to AOA’s National Joint Replacement Registry.

Introduction: As an example of possibilities of Spine Tango we extracted data on dural tears, one of the most frequent types of complications in posterior spinal fusion. Little is known about their predictors. This study examined which factors predict the occurrence of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion.

Methods: Prospective consecutive documentation of hospital based interventions with an evidence level 2++. Between 05/2005 and 11/2006 data of 3437 patients were documented in the registry. 929 patients, who had been treated with posterior spinal fusion after opening of the spinal canal, were included in this study. Median age was 62.7 yrs (min 12.5, max 90.5 yrs) with a female to male ratio of 2:1. In 18 of 929 cases a dural tear occurred. Dural tears being the most frequent type of complications in the registry were chosen as dependent outcome variable (3–6). Multiple linear regression with stepwise elimination was performed on potential predictor-variables of the occurrence of dural tears. Benchmarking compared the performance of single hospitals with international peers.

Results: Hospital (p=0.02) and number of segments of fusion (p=0.018) were found to be predictors of the occurrence of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion. Number of fusions per hospital (min 25, max 526) and academic status of hospital had no influence on the rate of dural tears. Fusions of four and more segments showed an increase of the rate of dural tears by a factor of three compared to fusions of less than four segments. There was no significant difference between fusions of one segment and fusions of two or three segments (1.3 vs. 1.9%) as well as between fusions of four or five segments and fusions of more than five segments (4.6 vs. 4.2%). Differences between hospitals remained when benchmarking dural lesions with case mix.

Discussion: The feasibility of data analysis and benchmarking from the International Spine Registry Spine Tango could be demonstrated. Predictors of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion are

hospital and

In fusions of four and more segments a threefold higher risk of dural tears in comparison to fusions of less than four segments should be taken into consideration. A subgroup analysis on the predictor-variable hospital should be performed assessing further covariates. However, this goes beyond the possibilities of documentation in this international spine registry.

Introduction: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a frequent indication for spinal surgery. The predictive quality of treadmill testing and MRI for diagnostic verification is not yet clearly defined. The aim of our study was to assess correlations between treadmill testing and MRI findings in the lumbar spine.

Methods: Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had been admitted for surgical treatment by means of decompression with or without stabilisation were prospectively examined. We included patients with lumbar spinal stenosis as defined by clinical symptoms like low back and/or leg pain, which increased when walking, and by the area of the dural sac examined by MRI. We excluded patients with clinically manifest peripheral arterial disease, polyneuropathy or musculoskeletal impairments compromising the ability to walk. Treadmill tests were performed using the standardized testing protocoll by Deen at a speed of 0.5 m/sec without inclination. After the onset of symptoms (pain, weakness or dysaesthesia), each patient decided when to end the test.

The area of the dural sac and neuroforamina was examined with MRI for the narrowest spinal segment. ODI and VAS were used for clinical assessment.

Results: 25 patients were included with a median age of 67 years (Interquartile range IQR 60–72 yrs). In the narrowest spinal segment the median area of the dural sac was 91mm2 (IQR 67–135 mm2). The median ODI was 66 percent (IQR 64–72 percent). The median walking distance in the treadmill test was 70 m (IQR 30–130 m). The distance reached in the treadmill test correlated with the area of the dural sac (Spearman’s rho=0.53) and ODI (rho=0.51), but not with the area of the neuroforamina and VAS.

Discussion: The treadmill test helps objectifying pre- and postsurgical clinical complaints and verifying a lumbar spinal stenosis by creating a situation of dynamic strain. Moreover, the treadmill test lets the patient experience his own physical limits and enables the examiner to attain a replicable postoperative assessment. The distance reached in the treadmill test predicts the grade of stenosis in MRI but has a limited diagnostic importance for the level of clinical symptoms in lumbar spinal stenosis.

SPINE TANGO is the first International Spine Register. While it has now been fully operational for five years, no results of its collected data have been presented yet. The Swedish Spine Register has already shown that a National Spine Register can generate valid and meaningful data. Here we present data from the first three versions of SPINE TANGO.

From 2002 until 2006 about 6000 datasets were submitted by 25 hospitals worldwide. Descriptive analysis was performed for demographic, surgery, and follow-up data comparing all three versions of SPINE TANGO.

Over the course of its existence the SPINE TANGO data base showed a rise in median patient age from 52.3 years to 58.6 years and an increasing percentage of degenerative disease as main pathology from 60.1% to 71.4 %. Posterior decompression was the most frequent surgical measure. About one third of all patients had follow-ups. Rehabilitation was arranged more frequently, especially home-based and outpatient rehabilitation. The complication rate was decreasing below 10%.

The feasibility of data analysis from the International Spine Register SPINE TANGO could be demonstrated performing descriptive analysis with an evidence level III. In the near future, the meanwhile established SPINE TANGO version 3 with patient based data will make outcome

evaluation possible. This will enable us to present more comprehensive analyses of SPINE TANGO and to make the data base even more beneficial for the whole spine community. In parallel to the International Spine Register SPINE TANGO, a National Spine Register in New Zealand could be set up – comparable to NZOA’s National Joint Register.

Hip and knee replacements are common and successful surgeries in orthopaedics. One of the known complications is fat embolism. Cemented implants used in arthroplasty allow good implant fixation and excellent long term results. However this has been associated with an increased incidence of fat embolism.

This experimental animal study compared the amount of fat embolism following three different surgeries in 30 Sprague Dawley rats. These surgeries simulated hip replacement procedures and included a control surgery, an un-cemented implant and a cemented implant. These animals were then sacrificed at 24 hours. All the lungs were fixed in formalin and then stained using Osmium Tetroxide. The amount of fat was then counted using a light microscope at 40x power.

Both the uncemented implant group (p < 0.001) and the cemented implant groups (p < 0.003) had significantly higher fat emboli from the surgical control group. There were also a significantly higher number of emboli (p < 0.05) in the cemented implant group compared to the uncemented implant group.

We conclude that fat embolism occurs in both the un-cemented and cemented hip replacement. The amount of emboli created by un-cemented hip replacement is less than the cemented hip replacement. The cement itself does not cause the complication of fat embolism. It is the high intramedullary pressure associated with the insertion of the implant, and the cementing process, that contributes to fat embolism. Devices or surgery that minimise this rise in pressure could reduce the amount of fat embolism.

Introduction Vertebroplasty (VP), where vertebral bodies are injected with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement, is used to treat various spinal lesions. More recently VP has been used for augmenting osteoporotic vertebral bodies that have fractured or are at risk of fracture. Although the complication rate for VP is low, thermal damage caused by the exothermic curing of PMMA has been implicated.

The aim of this series of experiments was to measure the temperatures reached during VP using a sheep model. The cement volume effect and inter cement differences were assessed. Spinal cord monitoring was undertaken to monitor spinal cord function during this procedure to validate this for clinical use.

Methods In the in vivo experiment each of the lumbar vertebral bodies of 10 sheep were injected with one of two cements (Simplex & Vertebroplastic) and one of two volumes (3.0ml or 6.0ml). This was undertaken through an open approach in the lumbar vertebrae. While performing the in vivo experimental studies 6 of the sheep were concurrently monitored using epidural Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP’s).

Results There was a significant increase in the temperature at the bone cement interface. The mean peak temperature at the bone-cement interface was 49.5 C (3.0ml Simplex); 61.47 C (6.0ml Simplex); 42.1 C (DePuy 3ml) and 47.2 (DePuy 6ml).

Spinal cord monitoring showed that when PMMA was injected into the correct location within the vertebral body there was no change in amplitude of the evoked potentials. When significant leakage of PMMA occurred, there was a decrease in amplitude of MEP’s.

Discussion In this sheep model, using cement volumes similar to those used in human clinical practice, we were able to monitor temperature changes within the vertebral body at the bone cement interface. The temperature of the bone cement interface reached temperatures that are known to cause tissue necrosis.

Using epidural monitoring we were able to show that when PMMA is injected into the correct location within the vertebral body there is no change in amplitude of MEP’s.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), where vertebral bodies are injected with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement, is used to treat various spinal lesions. Although the complication rate for PVP is low, thermal damage caused by the exothermic curing of PMMA has been implicated.

This study was to measure the temperatures reached during PVP as PMMA cures as well as assessing the cement volume effect and inter cement differences. Validating spinal cord monitoring during PVP was also undertaken.

In the in vivo experiment each of the lumbar vertebral bodies of 10 sheep were injected with one of two cements and one of two volumes. Thermocouple monitoring was undertaken at the bone cement interface. While undertaking the in vivo experimental studies 6 sheep underwent epidural monitoring using Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs).

The mean peak temperature at the bone-cement interface was 49.5 C (3.0ml Simplex); 61.47 C (6.0ml Simplex); 42.1 C (DePuy 3ml) and 47.2 (DePuy 6ml). Spinal cord monitoring showed that when cement was injected into the correct location within the trabeculae of the vertebral body no change in amplitude monitoring was noted. When leakage occurred, deliberate or unintended, amplitude changes were noted.

Using cement volumes similar to those used in human clinical practice in a sheep model we were able to monitor temperature changes. The temperature of the bone cement interface reached temperatures that are known to cause tissue necrosis. Using epidural monitoring we were able to detect leakage of cement during injection.

Locking compression plate is part of a new plate generation requiring an adapted surgical technique and new thinking about commonly used concepts of internal fixation using plates.

They offer a number of advantages in fracture fixation combining angular stability through the use of locking screws with traditional fixation techniques. This makes the implant suitable for poor bone stock and for fractures in metaphyseal areas.

However the system is complex and cases of plate loosening and plate breakage reported by many authors recently, many of these authors believe it is attributed to the choice of inappropriate plate and/or fixation technique rather than to the features of locking compression plate system.

We are reporting 2 cases of plate breakage after using it to fix diaphyseal femoral shaft fractures; in each case we discuss the pitfalls in the fixation method.

The locking plate manual did not highlight the important pitfalls, which was published later on in the literature as guidelines for their clinical application. Careful and detailed attention to the biomechanical principles of locking compression is crucial to the success of implant in fixing fractures in diaphyseal areas.

Cementless implants have gained popularity in modern orthopaedic practice. The type implants and surface characteristics on fixation has been extensively investigated, however there is insufficient data on the effect of the host bone bed status on implant fixation. This study aims to determine if there is a correlation between the fixation strength of cementless press-fit implants and bone mineral density (BMD) of the host bone bed.

Implants coated with pure titanium, Hydroxyapatite (HA) with or without Hyaluronic Acid (HY) and implants coated with bone growth factors – Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2) were inserted into tibiae and femora of 32 skeletally mature ewes (109 implants) for a period of 1, 2 and 4 weeks. Mechanical pull-out testing was performed after each time interval to evaluate the ultimate load of failure (Nmm⁻²). The BMD (gcm⁻³) surrounding the implant site was measured using a CT scanner.

The mean BMD (S.D.) was 1.515gcm⁻³ (0.147gcm⁻³). The mean (S.D.) mechanical pull-out strength at 1, 2 and 4 weeks was 0.37 (0.31), 3.14 (0.17) and 9.74 (2.31) Nmm⁻² respectively. The overall correlation co-efficient between BMD and pull out strength is 0.31.

Early fixation strength of implants is independent of BMD, however, the strength of fixation increases with time in a ‘normal’ sheep population. This suggests that the fixation of implants is dependent on the type of implant and surface coating used rather than the density of the host bone bed.

The aim of this study was to evaluate a new joint arthroplasty clinical priority scoring tool.

A new arthroplasty scoring tool based on pain, function, social limitation, potential of benefit from surgery and consequence of more than 6 months delay was developed and evaluated using 16 patient scenarios (vignettes) related to hip and knee osteoarthritis. Sixteen orthopaedic surgeons were asked to score the vignettes using clinical ranking, ISS tool and the new tool.

Significant variation in ranks allocated by surgeons was recorded for all three tools. Vignettes at either end of the scale ie. those who are severely or minimally disabled had less variability compared to a large group in the middle range. Comparing the three tools there did not appear to by any advantage of one over the other. Most of the variations occurred in the interpretation of benefit from the operation and consequence of delay.

Scoring tools rely heavily on judgement based decisions. More work is required to understand judgement processes used by surgeons and audit/feedback mechanisms may help in reducing the variations in priority assignment.