The effect of each step of medial soft tissue releases on the external rotation angle of the femoral component was assessed during posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA) with modified gap control technique. Consecutive 840 knees were assessed. During PS-TKA, medial soft tissue release was done to obtain rectangular gap in extension using tensors/balancers. The deep fiber of medial collateral ligament (MCL) was released in all cases. No more release was done in 464 knees. Only anterior fiber of superficial MCL was released in 49 knees, and only posterior fiber of superficial MCL was released in 129 knees. Both fibers were released in 169 knees. Additional pes anserinus was released in 29 knees. Rotation angle of the femoral component was decided based on the flexion gap angle. The angle was compared among the five groups.Introduction
Methods
The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle between the mechanical axis of the femur (FM) and the mechanical axis of the tibia (TM) is the standard parameter to assess the coronal alignment of the lower extremity. TM is the line between the center of the tibial spines notch (Point T) and the center of the tibial plafond. However, this theory is based on the premise that TM coincides the anatomical axis of the tibia (TA). Fig.1a shows typical varus knee with medial shift of the tibial articular surface. In this case, TM does not coincide TA. Fig. 2 demonstrates the error of HKA angle when Point T locates medial to TA. Fig.2a shows normal alignment. Fig.2b shows varus alignment. Fig. 2c shows the tibia with medial shift of the tibial articular surface. The tibia has 7 degrees varus articular inclination in Fig.2b and 2c. However, HKA angle is 0 degree in Fig.2c. HKA angle underestimates varus deformity in knees with medial shift of the tibial articular surface. However, the degree of medial shift of the tibial articular surface is obscure. In this study, detailed anatomical configuration of the proximal tibia was evaluated. The effect of the value of HKA angle on the coronal alignment in TKA was then discussed. This study consists of 117 knees. On the AP view radiograph of the tibia, three distance and two angle parameters were measured. Those were tibial articular surface width, distance between medial edge of the tibial articular surface and Point T, distance from TA to Point T. Angle between TM and TA, and the varus inclination angle of the tibial articular surface relative to the perpendicular line to TA.Introduction
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shape of patella relative to the femoral epicondylar axis and to find sex differences. Computed tomography (CT) images of 100 knees with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in 100 patients were prospectively collected. All patients were diagnosed as varus-type osteoarthritis with no destructive patellar deformity. Fifty patients were male and 50 female. The average male age was 70.8±14.6 (mean ± SD) years and the average female age was 73.3±6.7 years. Forty nine knees were right and 51 knees were left. The average height of males was 162.6±7.4 cm and that of females 149.6±5.7 cm. Males were significantly taller than females. The CT scan was performed with 2mm-interval slices in the vertical plane to the long axis of femoral shaft. Every CT image was examined to determine the maximum distance between the medial and lateral femoral epicondyle (inter-epicondylar distance, IED) along the epicondylar axis. The maximum patellar width and thickness were also measured at the image which had these maximum distances, while patellar cartilage thickness in anteroposterior diameter was not measured in this study. For evaluating the patellar size, each measured value was divided by IED and calculated each ratio. The ratio of patellar width to patellar thickness was also calculated. All parameters were compared between males and females. Statistical software Statview ver.5.0 (SAS Institute Inc.) was used for all analyses with significance being set at the 5% level.Objective
Materials and methods
Postoperative functional outcomes and patients’ satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty are associated with postoperative range of motion. Severe deformities require surgical correction such as soft tissue release and appropriate bone resection. The goal of surgery is to correct the contracture and bring the knee to good range of motion. Using gap-balancing technique is one of the major techniques to obtain good range of motion. Although the gaps are well balanced, the thickness of tibial insert would affect the range of motion. In this study, we analyzed the difference between intraoperative extension joint gap and the thickness of implanted insert (DJI). The objective of this study was to investigate whether DJI affected the postoperative extension of the knee. A total of 155 knees were analyzed retrospectively. Subject included 27 males and 128 females with an average of 72.7 ± 7.0 years. The mean preoperative knee flexion angle was 136.1 ± 20.0°and the mean preoperative knee extension deficit was 4.0 ± 6.1°. All the patients had a diagnosis of varus-type osteoarthritis, identical prostheses (Stryker NRG posterior-stabilized type) implanted with a modified gap-balancing technique and no postoperative complications which may have affected the range of motion. Range of motion was measured using a goniometer before surgery and 12 months after surgery. Joint gap between femoral component and proximal tibia in full extension was measured by a tensor/ balancer device which added joint gap an expansion force by 30 inch pounds intra-operatively. Although we empirically regarded the appropriate DJI was 5 mm for this prosthesis, we determined the thickness of the tibial inserts considering preoperative range of motion. Thinner inserts compared with the joint gap was implanted for knees with flexion contracture and thicker inserts was implanted for knees with hyperextension. In this study, to determine the relationship of DJI and flexion contracture, the correlation coefficient between DJI and extension deficit was calculated. The diagram of DJI and postoperative extension angle is shown in Figure 1. The correlation coefficient between DJI and postoperative extension deficit was 0.24, which showed that DJI slightly affected the postoperative extension of the knee. Flexion contracture cannot be corrected by simply adjusting DJI.
