To review the evidence and reach consensus on recommendations for follow-up after total hip and knee arthroplasty. A programme of work was conducted, including: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature; analysis of routine national datasets to identify pre-, peri-, and postoperative predictors of mid-to-late term revision; prospective data analyses from 560 patients to understand how patients present for revision surgery; qualitative interviews with NHS managers and orthopaedic surgeons; and health economic modelling. Finally, a consensus meeting considered all the work and agreed the final recommendations and research areas.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to conduct a cross-sectional, observational cohort study of patients presenting for revision of a total hip, or total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, to understand current routes to revision surgery and explore differences in symptoms, healthcare use, reason for revision, and the revision surgery (surgical time, components, length of stay) between patients having regular follow-up and those without. Data were collected from participants and medical records for the 12 months prior to revision. Patients with previous revision, metal-on-metal articulations, or hip hemiarthroplasty were excluded. Participants were retrospectively classified as ‘Planned’ or ‘Unplanned’ revision. Multilevel regression and propensity score matching were used to compare the two groups.Aims
Methods
53 patients required revision of both components. There were 49 stem only revisions. 4 patients were re-revised for recurrent loosening and 2 for infection. There were 14 dislocations. Of these, 4 required secondary stabilisation and 2 underwent Girdlestone’s excision arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation. 46 of the 64 patients who attended final follow-up had no changes in their X-ray appearances compared to the immediately post-operative films. 9 of the stems and 9 of the cups had signs of progressive lucent lines around the cement mantle. This gives a survivorship of 89% at ten years with reoperation for any cause as the end-point.
Considerable differences in kinematics between different designs of knee prostheses and compared to the natural knee have been seen in vivo. Most noticeably, lift off of the femoral condyles from the tibial insert has been observed in many patients. The aim of this study was to simulate lateral femoral condylar lift off in vitro and to compare the wear of fixed bearing knee prostheses with and without lift off. Twelve PFC Sigma cruciate retaining fixed bearing knees (DePuy, Leeds, UK) were tested using six station simulators (Prosim, Manchester, UK). The kinematic input conditions were femoral axis loading (maximum 2.6 kN), flexion-extension (0–58°), internal/external rotation (±5°) and anterior/posterior displacement (0–5 mm). Six knees were tested under these standard conditions for 4 million cycles. Six knees were tested under these conditions with the addition of lateral femoral condylar lift off, for 5 million cycles. The lubricant used was 25% newborn calf serum. Wear of the inserts was determined gravimetrically. Under the standard kinematic conditions the mean wear rate with 95% confidence limits was 8.8 ± 4.8 mm 3/million cycles. When femoral condylar lift off was simulated the mean wear rate increased to 16.4 ± 2.9mm 3/million cycles, which was statistically significantly higher (p <
0.01, Students t-test). The wear patterns on the femoral articulating surface of all the inserts showed more burnishing wear on the medial condyle than the lateral. However, in the simulation of lift off the medial condyle was more aggressively worn with evidence of adhesion and surface defects. The presence of lateral femoral condylar lift off accelerated the wear of PFC Sigma cruciate retaining fixed bearing knees. The lateral lift off produced uneven loading of the bearing, resulting in elevated contact stresses and hence more wear damage to the medial side of the insert. The implications of condylar lift off include increased wear of the polyethylene and possible osteolysis.
There is currently much interest in the wear of metal-on-metal THRs and potential concerns about elevated metal ion levels. Generally, wear of metal-on-metal THR’s has been low in simulator studies. Slightly higher and more variable wear has been found clinically. Variations in surgical approach, technique and fixation method may influence the level of force applied across the prosthesis during gait. It is hypothesised that increased joint tensioning may increase loading of THR’s during the swing-phase; leading to elevated wear and friction due to depleted fluid film lubrication. This study aimed to assess the effect of swing-phase load on the friction, lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal THR’s. Cobalt-chrome 28mm metal-on-metal THR’s were tested in a physiological hip simulator, loading was modified to provide; (1) ISO swing-phase load (280N, as per ISO 14242-1) and (2) low swing-phase load (<
100N). Friction testing was conducted using a pendulum friction simulator, with 280N and 100N swing-phase loads. Theoretical lubrication modelling was carried out using elastohydrodynamic lubrication theory. The overall mean volumetric wear rates was 10-times greater in THR’s tested with an ISO swing-phase load in comparison to THR’s tested with low swing-phase loads (0.58±0.49 compared to 0.06±0.039mm3/million cycles). The friction factors were 0.129 and 0.173 respectively under low and ISO swing-phase conditions. A decrease in the predicted lubricant film thickness when the swing-phase load was increased was observed; at the start of stance phase this was 0.12microns and 0.07microns under low and ISO swing-phase conditions respectively. The results demonstrate that the performance of metal-on-metal THR’s is highly dependent on swing-phase load conditions. It is postulated that fixation method and surgical technique can affect the swing-phase load. This study has demonstrated that over-tensioning of the tissues may also accelerate wear. These observations may explain some of the variations reported clinically.
The management of leg-length inequality following total hip replacement remains controversial. Many leg length discrepancies are well tolerated and need no treatment. Some patients require only a heel raise, but some patients remain dissatisfied after their hip replacement surgery. A recent report has suggested that leg-lengthening following total hip replacement does not correlate with patient satisfaction nor joint-specific or generic health scores[ All 4 patients underwent revision surgery which equalised leg length and resulted in immediate and complete resolution of their symptoms. We discuss the clinical findings, x-ray appearances and surgical technique employed to correct this problem. We have never had to revise a hip because of a shortened leg on the operated side.
From February 1992 to December 1997, 379 total hip arthroplasties in 342 patients were performed. 13 patients were lost to follow up, with 33 unrelated deaths. All arthroplasties were performed via the posterior approach in the lateral position. All patients were enrolled in an arthroplasty register at the time of surgery by the operating surgeon. Patients underwent clinical and radiological follow up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to determine the failure rate of the prosthesis, with revision surgery or decision to revise as the end-point. The overall survivorship from all causes of failure at 5–10 years was 99.4%. There were two stem revisions. One stem was revised for aseptic loosening at 4 years and one revised for recurrent dislocation. The stem aseptic loosening rate was 0.26%. The cup aseptic loosening rate was 0%. The dislocation rate was 0.53% (2 from 379). The superficial infection rate was 0.53% (2 from 379). There were no deep infections in this series. At 12 months 71.2% had no pain (270 from 379), and 53.8% (204 from 379) had normal function. 94.5% said the procedure was worthwhile or very good. At 12 months radiological follow-up revealed progressive radioluceny in 7.65% (29 from 379) acetabuli, and progressive radiolucency in 2.90% (11 from 379) femora (one progressing to revision for aseptic loosening). No acetabular cups required revision. In patients aged 65 years or younger at the time of surgery the survivorship was 100% for both components. Attention to meticulous and consistent operative technique in acetabular and femoral preparation, in particular a complete cement mantle with good zone 7 cement and osseointegrated cement bone interfaces, enables these results to be achieved. In 2004 the Charnely Hip replacement remains the Gold Standard hip replacement.
An audit of a group of dislocations (7 out of 66 hip replacements) revealed a problem with the Charnley Golf Ball cup when used with the posterior approach. Sixty-six consecutive Charnley hip replacements in one institution by one surgeon using the posterior approach over a one year period are presented. The dislocation rate prior to the introduction of the Golf Ball cup was less than 1%. The overall dislocation rate after the introduction of the Golf Ball socket rose to 10.6%. Four patients suffered one dislocation, 2 patients suffered two dislocations and 1 patient suffered a dislocation and spontaneous reduction. Five patients were revisions hip replacements and 61 primary hip replacements. Two of the revisions dislocated. A study of the type of acetabular component type in this series showed there were 17 Wroblewski Angle Bore Sockets (WAB), 11 ogee long posterior wall sockets (OGLPW) and 38 golf ball (GB) sockets making a total of 66 hip replacements. Of the 17 patients with the WAB the dislocation rate was 0 %. Of the 11 OGLPW patients the dislocation rate was 0 %. However in the 38 patients with golf ball sockets the dislocation rate was 18% (7/38). All the dislocations were anterior. The acetabular component position was flexion 15–30 degrees (mode 30 degrees) and anteversion 0–10 degrees (mode 0 degrees). The numbers were not large enough to produce any statistical correlation. All femoral stems were set to 0 degrees anteversion. Following this audit we discontinued the use of the golf ball socket with the posterior approach and have had no further dislocations in primary hip replacement using either the OGLPW or the WAB sockets. Surgeons who use the posterior approach should be warned about the problems of a high anterior dislocation rate when using the Golf Ball cup.
A physiological hip simulator was used, loads and motions were applied to approximate