Objectives

Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing was introduced into clinical practice because it was perceived to be a better alternative to conventional total hip replacement for young and active patients. However, an increasing number of reports of complications have arisen focusing on design and orientation of the components, the generation of metallic wear particles and serum levels of metallic ions. The procedure introduced a combination of two elements: large-dimension components and hard abrasive particles of metal wear. The objective of our study was to investigate the theory that microseparation of the articular surfaces draws in a high volume of bursal fluid and its contents into the articulation, and at relocation under load would generate high pressures of fluid ejection, resulting in an abrasive water jet.

Introduction:. The C-Stem in its design as a triple tapered stem, is the logical development of the original Charnley flat-back polished stem. The concept, design and the surgical technique cater for a limited slip of the stem within the cement mantle transferring the load more proximally.

Method: Five thousand two hundred and thirty three primary procedures using a C-stem have been carried out since 1993. We reviewed all 621 cases that had their total hip arthroplasty before 1998.

Results:. Sixty nine patients (70 hips) had died and 106 hips had not reached a ten-year clinical and radiological follow-up and had not been revised. In 22 hips, the stem had been changed before the 10 year follow-up, with infection, dislocation and loosening of the cup being the reasons for revision. None of the stems were loose.

The remaining 423 hips had a mean follow-up of 11 years (range 10 – 15 years). There were 216 women and 173 men, and 34 patients had bilateral LFAs. The patients’ mean age at surgery was 53 years (range 16 – 83 years). Thirty eight hips had been revised at the time of review. The reasons for revision were infection in 5: dislocation in 2: loose cup in 28: wear in 2 and 1 for meralgia paresthetica where the stem was found to be well fixed. In 1 case which had not been revised there was radiological loosening of the stem in a patient with Gaucher’s disease.

Discussion: With only 1 stem radiologically loose and no revisions for stem loosening the clinical results are very encouraging and they support the concept of the Charnley cemented low friction arthroplasty, but place a demand on the understanding of the technique and its execution at surgery.

Background: Dislocation after total hip replacement (THR) is a significant concern with the increased number of THR carried out all over the world, although there has been a substantial lack of information regarding revision THR for instability in literature.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of operative treatment for recurrent dislocation after THR.

Material and methods: One hundred and eleven cases were treated operatively for recurrent dislocation after THR by a senior author (BMW). Group A; 104 cases were operated with change of either or both of components, a socket and a stem. Twenty-two mm head was used in 90 cases (A-1), 32 mm head in twelve (A-2), and 36 mm head in two (A-3). Group B; only modular head was changed in one case. Group C; augmentation device was applied on a cup in six cases. The average follow-up period was 6.2 years (range, 1 to 21 years).

Results: Group A-1; twelve cases (13%) required further operations for instability (N=90). Group A-2; one case (8.3%) was converted to Girdle-Stone for recurrent dislocation (N=12). Group A-3; one of them was revised for periprosthetic fracture (N=2). Group B; the case survived at the follow-up of 3.3 years (N=1). Group C; two cases (33%) were revised for dislocation (N=6).

Conclusion: We reported the largest series of revision THR for recurrent dislocation by a single surgeon with a considerable length of follow-up periods. Revision THR with change of components was an effective treatment for recurrent dislocation after THR.

Since wear and loosening of the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene is the one factor limiting the life of the arthroplasty we set out to identify factors associated with either low wear 0.02 mm/year or less, or high wear 0.2 mm/year or more.

In a group of 1092 patients, 1434 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties 190 (13.2%) showed low wear while 149 (10.4%) showed high wear. We used Chi square test to assess the significance.

The characteristics of the low wear group were: female gender (p=0.042) Rheumatoid arthritis (p= 0.014), Charnley category “C” patients (p=0.03) and varus position of the stem (p=0.003) The use of acetabular cement pressurization (p=0.07) and medialization of the cup (p=0.07) approached significance.

In the high wear group there was a predominance of males (p=0.042) with primary arthritis (p=0.006) as the underlying hip pathology, and the stem in valgus position (p=0.023). Rim position of the cup was approaching significance (p=0.07). There was no statistical significance between the two groups for revision for aseptic stem loosening or stem fracture (p= 0.49). There was a highly significant difference (p< 0.0001) between the two groups for revision for wear and aseptic cup loosening: 5.3% against 40%.

Changes in the cup geometry are sufficient to explain the increasing incidence with depth of cup penetration. There is much to be gained from the use of low wearing ceramic – ultra high molecular weight combination. Tissue reaction to the plastic particles cannot be the cause of stem loosening.

Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) was introduced into clinical practice by Charnley in November 1962 and has remained the standard material for the hip and other total joint arthroplasties.

Wear of the UHMWPE cup, although studied from the beginning, did not appear to be a clinical problem although Charnley suspected that this would be so in the long term.

A review of the outcome of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in patients under the age of 40 years at the time of the operation has shown that the incidence of cup migration was exponentially related to the depth of cup penetration. A prospective study using 22.225 mm alumina ceramic (Al 20 3 ) head articulating with cross linked polyethylene was set up with the initial penetration of 0.2 – 0.4 mm in about 2.5 years with no further penetration. The clinical results mirrored closely the experimental results obtained with the identical set of materials and design. The clinical results have now reached 14 year follow-up and the initial total penetration of 0.2 – 0.4mm has remained unchanged.

Review of long term results of the Charnley LFA has shown a mean penetration rate of 0.1 mm/year (0.02 – 0.6). With a mean penetration rate of 0.1 mm/year, the revision rate for cup wear and loosening in patients under the age of 50 at the time of the LFA, and with a follow-up to 32 years, is in the region of 10%. If the penetration rate remained at 0.02 mm/year or less then no cups have been revised for aseptic loosening. Ceramic / UHMWPE articulation is the next stage of evolution of the Charnley LFA. A prospective study using zirconia 22.225 mm head is approaching 7 year follow-up in over 1000 cases.

A prospective study of Charnley low friction arthroplasty in patients under the age of 51 at the time of surgery.

1092 patients, 668 women and 424 men, mean age 41 years (12–51) at the time of surgery had 1434 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties carried out between November 1962 and December 1990. At mean follow-up 14.2 years (1 – 32), 742 patients (973 hips) are still attending and patients’ satisfaction with the outcome is 96.2%. Survivorship was 95.24% at 10 years and 58.67% at 27 years.

Patients who had had previous hip surgery had revision rate 24.8% compared with 14.1%. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had fewer revisions than those with developmental hip dysplasia or primary osteoarthritis. Large 43 mm diameter cup gave lower revisions for aseptic cup loosening as compared with 40mm cup. Presence and preservation of subchondral plate, rim support compared to medialization of the cup, use of acetabular cement pressurizer and the reduced diameter neck (10mm) all made a contribution to reducing the incidence of revisions for aseptic cup loosening. Closing the medullary canal with bone block reduced the incidence of aseptic stem loosening. Use of the brace reamers did not affect the outcome and there appears to have been no advantage with the flanged stem.

The long-term problem was the increasing incidence of revisions for aseptic cup loosening. This was exponentially related to the depth of cup penetration by the head of the femoral component.

The long term clinical results of the Charnley LFA remain excellent even in young patients. Rim support of the cup, preservation of the subchondral bone of the acetabulum, cup flange and pressurising of the acetabular cement all make a significant contribution. Distal closure of the medullary canal and central position of the stem are of benefit, but reaming the medullary canal to cortex must be avoided. The long-term problem has been highlighted again as: wear and cup loosening.