Using patient-oriented outcome measures, we examined twenty-six patients following surgical repair of clavicular nonunion. Patient satisfaction was high, and there was only a minor degree of residual disability (mean DASH score 14.5, SF-36 scores within normal range). Time from injury to surgical repair did not influence results.

Using modern, patient-oriented limb-specific outcome measures, we sought to determine the effect of time to repair on patient satisfaction following surgical fixation of nonunion of the clavicular shaft.

As measured by the DASH and SF-36, patient satisfaction was high following clavicular nonunion repair with only minor degrees of residual disability. Time to repair did not have a significant effect on outcome.

Previous reports of clavicular nonunion repair have concentrated on radiographic or surgeon-based criteria. Our study shows that successful clavicular nonunion repair effectively restores upper extremity function and general health status to near-normal levels.

We identified twenty-six patients who had undergone open reduction, internal fixation of a nonunion of the clavicular shaft. There were sixteen men and ten women, with a mean age of forty-four years (range thirty to seventy-one years). The mean duration of nonunion was 1.9 years with a range from four months to thirty-one years. All patients underwent fixation with a plate, and 73% of patients also underwent iliac crest bone grafting. Two nonunions required revision surgery for healing: twenty-four healed after the index procedure. We assessed patient outcome using standard history and physical, radiographs, and the DASH and SF-36 outcome instruments. The mean DASH score (0 = perfect, 100 = complete disability, “normal” = 10) was 14.5 (range 0 to 58), indicating good restoration of upper extremity function with mild residual disability. SF-36 scores were within the normal range. There was no significant difference in DASH or SF-36 scores between those fixed “early” (< six months) and those repaired “late” (> six months), p=0.30, p=0.78, respectively.

Using patient-oriented outcome measures, we examined twenty-six patients following surgical repair of clavicular nonunion. Patient satisfaction was high, and there was only a minor degree of residual disability (mean DASH score 14.5, SF-36 scores within normal range). Time from injury to surgical repair did not influence results.

We evaluated the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) following vascularized fibular grafting for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. A group of twenty-two patients who had been converted from a vascularized fibular graft to THA was compared to a similar group of twenty-two patients who had received a THA with no prior graft. The graft group was found to have worse outcomes than the control group as measured by SF-36, and WOMAC scores, as well as a hip score.

These results show that vascularized fibular grafting complicates future THA.

The Purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) following vascularized fibular grafting for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. These results indicate that functional and clinical outcome following post-graft THA is worse than outcome following THA performed as a primary intervention.

Judicious use of the vascularized fibular graft procedure is critical in order to minimize the number of graft failures and avoid the negative outcomes associated with THA after failed vascularized fibular grafting.

Twenty-six hips in twenty-two patients who had a THA following a failed vascularized fibular graft were compared to a group of twenty-three hips in twenty-two age and sex-matched patients who had received a THA with no prior graft (combined mean age: 39.0 yrs). Primary outcome measures included the SF-36 (patient-based general health assessment – total score and physical sub-component) and WOMAC (patient-based arthritis specific score) scores at matched follow up times (mean: 6.2years, range: two to fourteen years). An objective hip score was also used, as were several radiographic variables. The post-graft group had lower SF-36 final scores (p< 0.006), lower SF-36: physical function scores (p< 0.001), and lower WOMAC scores (p< 0.045) than the control group. Post-graft THA was complicated by longer operative time (p< 0.025) and greater subsidence of the femoral prosthesis (p< 0.004) compared to controls. Additionally, the post-graft group had worse hip score values (p< 0.05) than controls.

Vascularized fibular grafting is a commonly used procedure to cure or delay progression of AVN in the hip. Currently this procedure is used for young (< 40 years) patients with hip AVN who are in an early, pre-collapse stage of the disease. Although the efficacy of vascularized fibular grafting has been proven, up to 29% of grafts fail at five years and need to be converted to THA (Urbaniak et al., 1995). This study shows that THA after failed vascularized fibular grafting has a worse outcome than THA as a primary intervention. Therefore judicious use of the graft procedure is critical in order to minimize the number of graft failures and avoid the negative outcomes associated with it.

The purpose of this study was to investigate patient-based functional outcome and objectively measure strength following plate fixation of fractures of both bones of the forearm. Twenty-five subjects were clinically and radiographically reviewed. Strength of elbow flexion, extension, supination, pronation, wrist flex-ion, extension and grip were significantly reduced in the injured arm. (p< 0.01, range 62%–84% of normal). Mean (+/− SE) DASH score was 19.5 +/− 4.0 and eighty-eight percent (22/25) scored good to excellent on the Gartland-Werley scale (mean 4.04 +/− 0.91). No statistical difference in mean maximal radial bow (MRB) or location of MRB between injured and non-injured arm was found.

The purpose of this study was to investigate functional outcome and objectively measure strength following plate fixation of fractures of both bones of the forearm (BBOF).

Anatomic reduction was associated with good to excellent functional outcome. However strength of the elbow, forearm, wrist and grip were significantly reduced in the injured arm.

Despite good to excellent functional outcome following this injury, significant reduction in strength of the upper extremity should be expected, and thus is an area for potential improvement in post-operative care.

Twenty-five subjects (M/F 19/6, mean age 47.6 (range 20–71)) treated with plate fixation for fractures of BBOF were clinically and radiographically reviewed. Mean duration of follow-up was 5.7 years (range 2–13.4 y). Post-operative protocol included short-term immobilization followed by active-assisted ROM and strengthening starting between four and six weeks. Isometric muscle strength was objectively measured with the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator (model WS-20). Strength of elbow flexion (72% of non-injured arm, p< 0.0001), elbow extension (84%, p=0.0004), forearm supination (75%, p=0.005), forearm pronation (69%, p< 0.0001), wrist flexion (81%, p=0.009), wrist extension (62%, p< 0.0001) and grip (70%, p< 0.0001) were all significantly reduced in the injured arm. Mean (+/− SE) DASH and Gartland-Werley scores were 19.5 +/− 4.0 (range 0–61) and 4.04 +/− 0.91 (range 0–15) respectively. Eighty-eight percent (22/25) scored good to excellent on the Gartland-Werley scale. No statistical difference in mean maximal radial bow (MRB) between injured and non-injured arm was found (mean +/− SE, 1.42 +/− 0.07 vs 1.58 +/− 0.05 respectively) or in location of MRB (61% vs 59%).

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cement mixing time on fixation augmentation in both healthy and simulated osteoporotic canine bone. In a canine diaphyseal model, screw insertion into liquid cement achieves greater bending stiffness and resists a greater load to failure than cement inserted as a paste. Bone cement in its liquid state may provide increased structural support in the setting of an osteoporotic fracture, possibly due to increased interdigitation of the cement with the screw threads and bone.

An inconsistency exists among orthopaedic surgeons with regards to the appropriate mixing time for bone cement to achieve optimal results. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cement mixing time on fixation augmentation in both healthy and simulated osteoporotic canine bone.

In a canine diaphyseal fracture model, screw insertion into liquid cement achieves greater bending stiffness and resists a greater load to failure than insertion into cement with the consistency of a paste.

Bone cement in its liquid state may provide increased structural support in the setting of an osteoporotic fracture, possibly due to increased interdigitation of the cement with the screw threads and bone.

Baseline stiffness for fourteen pairs of cadaveric canine femora was determined. A transverse diaphyseal osteotomy was created and fixed using an eight-hole DC plate and 3.5 mm screws. A 1cm gap was created at the osteotomy site simulating loss of bone. In the left femora, cement was mixed for one minute (liquid) prior to injection into pre-drilled holes; in the right femora, cement was mixed for five minutes prior to injection (thick paste). In each mixing time group, seven specimens were treated with a plate and properly sized pre-drilled and tapped holes (2.5mm), and seven received over-drilled holes (3.2 mm) to simulate osteoporotic bone. Four-point bending stiffness was determined for each plated construct, and normalized to baseline stiffness. Specimens were then loaded to failure.

Within the properly sized holes, there were no statistically significant differences (SSD) in bending stiffness with or without a gap. The liquid cement had a force to failure 77% greater than that of cement as a paste (p< 0.05). Within the over-sized holes, there was no SSD between liquid and paste without a gap. With a gap, liquid cement demonstrated an increased bending stiffness of 24 % (p< 0.05) and force to failure was 92% higher (p< 0.05).

Introduction and Aims: Open femoral fracture is a serious injury. We have asked the question: do open femur fractures in polytrauma patients correlate with higher injury severity scores, increased length of stay and higher mortality rates than in closed femur fracture polytrauma patients.

Method: We undertook a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered trauma database at a Level 1 trauma centre. We identified multiple-injured patients with femur fractures who presented in a 36 month period. The cases were divided into 2 groups; open femur fractures (n=33) and closed femur fractures (n=80). Data was collected on demographics, precipitating event, length of stay spent in the ICU, number of associated injuries, ISS, AIS for affected systems, number of femoral surgeries and disposition. Data was analyzed using parametric statistical tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Our analysis revealed that an average, patients in the open femur fracture group spent 8 + 9 days in ICU, sustained 4 + 1 associated injuries, underwent 2 + 1 femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 13, and died of their injuries in 30.3% of cases. Patients in the closed femur fracture groups spent 8 + 9 days in ICU, sustained 4 + 1 associated injuries, underwent 1 + 1 femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 14, and died of their injuries in 12.5% of cases. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of time spent in ICU, ISS and number of associated injuries. The average number of surgeries was significantly greater in the open femur fracture group (p-value 0.000). A Chi-squared analysis of disposition indicated that patients with femur fractures were more likely to die of their injuries (p-value 0.020).

Conclusions: Findings of the current study demonstrate that while the presence of an open femur fracture does not correlate with an increase in ISS or increase ICU length of stay it may act as a marker for more serious prognosis in polytrauma patients.

Introduction and Aims: The combination of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures is an uncommon pattern associated with high-energy trauma. This retrospective study used self-report measures to evaluate functional outcome of patients sustaining this fracture pattern and compared two common treatment methods.

Method: Three patient-based outcome measures, the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were used to evaluate the functional outcome of twenty-one patients (13 male, mean 46.7 +/− 16.5 years) treated with a reconstruction nail (n=11) or with a sliding hip screw and retrograde nail (n=10).

Results: Mechanisms of injury included motor vehicle accidents (66.7%) and falls from height (14.3%). SF-36 physical and mental component scores were less than Canadian norms, with mean values of 35.9 (p=0.0001) and 43.7 (p=0.02), respectively. There was a trend towards better functional outcome in the group treated with the sliding hip screw with retrograde nail despite this group sustaining more severe injuries as measured by ISS (p=0.004), number of days in hospital (p=0.027), and number of days in ICU (p=0.009).

Conclusion: Functional outcome following treatment of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures was reduced compared to Canadian norms. Despite having sustained more severe injuries, the sliding hip screw with retrograde nail group showed a trend towards better outcome as compared to the group treated with the reconstruction nail.

Introduction and Aims: Patient-based functional outcome and strength following plate fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate patient-based functional outcome and objectively measured strength following plate fixation of fractures of both bones of the forearm (BBOF).

Method: Twenty-five subjects (M/F 19/6, mean age 47.6 (range 20–71) treated with plate fixation for fractures of BBOF were clinically and radiographically reviewed. Mean duration of follow-up was 5.7 years (range 2–13.4 years). Post-operative protocol included short-term immobilisation followed by active-assisted ROM and strengthening starting between four and six weeks. All subjects were assessed in person at follow-up with a detailed examination of strength of their injured and non-injured arms. Isometric muscle strength was objectively measured with the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator (model WS-20). Standardised anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were made of both forearms.

Results: Strength of elbow flexion (72% of non-injured arm, p< 0.0001), elbow extension (84%, p=0.0004), forearm supination (75%, p=0.005), forearm pronation (69%, p< 0.0001), wrist flexion (81%, p=0.009), wrist extension (62%, p< 0.0001) and grip (70%, p< 0.0001) were all significantly reduced in the injured arm. Mean (+/− SE) DASH and Gartland-Werley scores were 19.5 +/− 4.0 (range 0–61) and 4.04 +/− 0.91 (range 0–15) respectively. Eighty-eight percent (22/25) scored good to excellent on the Gartland-Werley scale. No statistical difference in mean maximal radial bow (MRB) between injured and non-injured arm was found (mean +/− SE, 1.42 +/− 0.07 vs 1.58 +/− 0.05 respectively) or in location of MRB (61% vs 59%).

Conclusion: Restoration of anatomic alignment with stable internal fixation following BBOF fracture results in good to excellent functional outcome. Despite this, significant reduction in strength of the elbow, forearm, wrist and grip should be expected following this injury, and is an area for potential improvement in post-operative care.

Introduction and Aims: Midcarpal instability is a common cause of wrist pain that remains poorly understood. A simple surgical treatment has been developed involving plication of the dorsal wrist capsule and ligaments. We hypothesised that: wrist stiffness varies in the population; laxity permits excessive displacement; and plication stiffens the joint decreasing motion.

Method: Twelve human cadaveric forearms were potted using bone cement and were secured to the stationary baseplate of a slider. The hand was fixed through the metacarpal bones to the mobile section of the slider, and a compressive load was applied. With the wrist positioned in neutral orientation, a force was applied by an Instron mechanical testing machine (Model 8874, Instron, Canton, MA), simulating a midcarpal shift test. Stiffness (force/displacement) was measured at baseline, with the capsule sectioned, and then following a surgical procedure consisting of plicating the ligaments and capsule with three mattress sutures at the midcarpal joint.

Results: Baseline testing revealed large variability in midcarpal joint stiffness: mean baseline stiffness was 16.5 + 5.9 N/mm, ranging from 9.3 to 28.1 N/mm. Following plication/repair, mean stiffness increased significantly by 20% to 19.8 + 8.5 N/mm (p < 0.02). All surgical repairs withstood the testing without failure. These data confirm a wide range of laxity at the midcarpal joint and provide a mechanical basis for the success observed with capsular plication of the joint.

This increased stiffness decreases motion under comparable loading conditions. In individuals who have excessive motion causing wrist symptoms, increasing the stiffness by capsular plication of the supporting ligaments decreases the motion to relieve symptoms. This technique has found success in clinical practice to relieve symptoms in patients with midcarpal instability.

Conclusion: Midcarpal joint stiffness spanned a threefold range supporting our hypothesis that there is a large variation of ligament laxity in the population. Suturing the dorsal wrist capsule and underlying ligaments significantly increased the stiffness of the wrist when a volar force was applied across the midcarpal joint.

Introduction and Aims: Bone cement (Polymethylmethacrylate) is commonly used to augment internal fixation in osteoporotic bone. An inconsistency exists among surgeons regarding the appropriate mixing time for bone cement to achieve optimal screw purchase. The study addresses the effect of cement viscosity on fixation augmentation in both healthy and simulated osteoporotic canine bone.

Method: Fourteen canine femora were plated using eight-hole DC plates and 3.5mm screws, repairing transverse diaphyseal osteotomies with and without a gap. In the left femora, cement was mixed for one minute (liquid) prior to injection into drilled and tapped holes that were either properly sized (2.5mm) or over-drilled (3.2mm) to simulate osteoporotic bone. In the right femora, cement was mixed for five minutes prior to injection (thick paste). Four-point bending stiffness for each plated construct was normalised to baseline stiffness, followed by failure loading.

Results: Within the properly sized holes, there were no significant differences in bending stiffness with or without a gap at the fracture site. The liquid cement had a force to failure 77% greater than that of cement as a paste (p< 0.05).

Within the over-sized holes simulating osteoporotic bone, there was no difference between liquid and paste without a gap. With a gap, liquid cement demonstrated an increased bending stiffness of 24% (p< 0.05) and force to failure was 92% higher (p< 0.05).

Bone cement in its liquid state may provide increased structural support in the setting of an osteoporotic fracture, possibly due to increased interdigitation of the cement with the screw threads and bone.

Conclusion: In a canine diaphyseal fracture model, screw insertion into liquid cement achieves greater bending stiffness and resists a greater load to failure than insertion into cement with the consistency of a paste.

Introduction and Aims: Open femoral fracture is a serious injury. We have asked the question: do open femur fractures in polytrauma patients correlate with higher injury severity scores, increased length of stay and higher mortality rates than in closed femur fracture polytrauma patients.

Method: We undertook a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered trauma database at a Level 1 trauma centre. We identified multiple-injured patients with femur fractures who presented in a 36-month period. The cases were divided into two groups: open femur fractures (n=33) and closed femur fractures (n=80). Data was collected on demographics, precipitating event, length of stay spent in the ICU, number of associated injuries, ISS, AIS for affected systems, number of femoral surgeries and disposition. Data was analysed using parametric statistical tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Our analysis revealed that on average, patients in the open femur fracture group spent eight + nine days in ICU, sustained four + one associated injuries, underwent two + one femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 13, and died of their injuries in 30.3% of cases. Patients in the closed femur fracture groups spent eight + nine days in ICU, sustained four + one associated injuries, underwent one + one femoral surgeries, had an ISS of 29 + 14, and died of their injuries in 12.5% of cases. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of time spent in ICU, ISS and number of associated injuries. The average number of surgeries was significantly greater in the open femur fracture group (p-value 0.000). A Chi-squared analysis of disposition indicated that patients with femur fractures were more likely to die of their injuries (p-value 0.020).

Conclusions: Findings of the current study demonstrate that while the presence of an open femur fracture does not correlate with an increase in ISS or increase ICU length of stay, it may act as a marker for more serious prognosis in polytrauma patients.