Introduction

Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty THA is a major short term complication not infrequently resulting in revision arthroplasty. Malposition of the acetabular component in THA results in a higher rate of dislocation as well as increased wear and osteolysis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of mode of fixation on positioning of the acetabular component.

Conventionally, medial malleolus fractures are treated surgically with anatomical reduction and internal fixation using screws. There seems to be no consensus, backed by scientific study on the optimal screw characteristics in the literature.

We retrospectively examined case notes and radiographs of 48 consecutive patients taken from our trauma database (21 male, 27 female) with an average age of 50 years (range 16-85) who had undergone medial malleolus fracture fixation with screws at the Royal Free Hospital, London between January 2009 and June 2010.

The most commonly used screw was the AO 4.0 mm diameter cancellous partially-threaded screw in 40, 45 and 50 mm lengths (40 mm n = 28, 45 mm n = 26, 50 mm n = 23) with the threads passing beyond the physeal scar in all cases. Incomplete reduction defined as > 1mm fracture displacement was observed on post-operative x-rays in 12 out of 48 cases (25%), all of which relied on partially-threaded screw fixation. In 5 cases where AO 4.0 mm diameter fully-threaded screws engaging the physeal scar had been used, no loss of reduction was observed.

This unusual, occasional use of fully-threaded screws prompted us to investigate further using a porcine model and adapted pedo-barographic transducer. We compared pressures generated within the fracture site using AO 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws, 4.0 mm partially-threaded cancellous screws and 4.0 mm fully-threaded cancellous screws.

Fully-threaded cancellous 4.0 mm diameter screws generated almost 3 times the compression of a partially-threaded cancellous screw with superior stability at the fracture. Partially-threaded screws quickly lost purchase, compression and stability particularly when they were cannulated. We also observed that screw thread purchase seemed enhanced in the physeal region.

We conclude that fully-threaded cancellous 4.0 mm AO screws are superior to longer partially-threaded screws and that use of cannulated 4.0 mm partially-threaded screws should be avoided in fixation of medial malleolus fractures.

Functional evaluations using the Harris hip scoring system and the delayed Trendelenberg test were performed on fifty randomly selected patients who had undergone cemented primary CPT total hip replacements (Zimmer UK) at least 12 months previously using Hardinge approach. The prosthesis used increases offset with femoral stem diameter but did not allow separate correction of neck offset.

Patients were grouped according to whether hip offset had been accurately reconstructed, increased or decreased. Their functional outcomes were compared. There was no significant difference (p value 0.57) in the final functional outcome between the three groups. Reconstruction of the hip using a standard cemented CPT prosthesis produced considerable variation in the reconstructed hip arthroplasty offset. This resulted in no functionally significant effect.

Accurate reconstruction of the hip joint offset in total hip arthroplasty may therefore not be as important in the early functional outcome as recently advocated.

Introduction and aims: Increasingly the accurate reconstruction of the hip in total hip arthroplasty is planned using pre-operative pelvic radiographs. The accuracy of reconstruction is assessed using post-operative pelvic radiographs. This study defines significant variations in the offset, hip joint centre and femoral head centre-trochanteric height relations in normal radiographs.

Method: One hundred standard normal pelvic radiographs were examined based on a defined criterion. The medial offset, the vertical height of hip joint centre with reference to the ischial tuberosity and the femoral head centre-trochanterc height relation were measured for both hips. The differences in measurements were evaluated to determine the normal variation in offset and the hip joint centre. The relationship of the femoral head centre to the tip of the greater trochanter was determined.

Results: On average, the right hip and left hip differed by 2.54mm in their offset .The standard deviation of differences was 2.31. Therefore the offset of one hip will predict the offset of the other hip to within 4.62mm, with 95% accuracy. If the reconstructed hip has an offset to within + 4.62 to – 4.62mm of the contra lateral side, then the offset should be considered to be reconstructed as normal. The average difference in height of the hip joint centres of right hip from left hip with reference to bi-ischial line was found to be 3.49mm. The standard deviation of differences was 3.15. Therefore the hip joint centre height measured in one hip will predict the hip joint centre height of the opposite hip to within 6.3mm with 95% accuracy. Thus the hip joint centre height of one hip may differ from the opposite hip by 6.3mm in normal individuals. The tip of greater trochanter was on average 8mm higher than the centre of rotation of the femoral head. The greater trochanter was not at the same level as the femoral head centre as commonly believed.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates considerable variation in the medial offset and the hip joint centre location on pelvic wall. The femur head centre is lower than commonly assumed. These factors should be taken into account when pre-operative planning using pelvic radiographs and assessing the quality of the post-operative reconstruction.

This study examined the reliability of pre-operative templating of the femur in total hip replacement (THR), and the accuracy of the templates provided by leading arthroplasty manufacturers. Templates are provided by arthroplasty manufacturers to be used with pre-operative radiographs as an aid to selecting the appropriate size of prosthesis that will allow an optimal cement mantle in THR. These templates vary in magnification from 10-20% (Mode 15%).

A retrospective review of the pre- and post-operative AP pelvis radiographs of 50 randomly selected patients who underwent THR in 1998 was performed. The radiographs were taken using the uniform standard technique. The magnification of the post-op radiograph was calculated by measuring the femoral head size. This was compared to the magnification of the pre-op radiographs using the ratio of the inter-teardrop distance. The post-operative radiographs were templated using a 15% template and compared to the size of prosthesis inserted.

The mean radiograph magnification was 22.5% (range 10.7 to 32.6%), with the majority (74%) between 20–25%. The 15% template oversized the prosthesis in 68% of cases. A 10% template would have been inaccurate in 96% of our sample group.

In a standard AP pelvis radiograph, the only variable that affects magnification is the extent to which the patient’s soft tissues raise the bony structures away from the plate. This variation in magnification renders preoperative templating of the femur in THR unreliable. Accuracy could be improved by using templates with a magnification of 22.5%.