This study aimed to examine the changing trends in the causes for early revision of total hip replacements (THR) in one country over fifteen years to assess whether changes in arthroplasty practices have changed revision patterns. The cause for revision within one year was extracted from the New Zealand Joint Registry for the period of January 1999 to December 2013. The results were grouped into three periods of 5 years (Period 1=1999–2003, Period 2=2004–2008 and Period 3 = 2009–2013). The causes were compared across the three periods and were adjusted for age, gender and ASA grade. The rate of early revisions (within one year) rose from 0.86% to 1.30% per year. There was significant rise in revision for deep infection (14% increased to 21% of all causes, p<0.001) and femoral fracture (5% increased to20%, p<0.001), whereas revision for dislocation decreased (55% decreased to 35%, p<0.001). Adjusting for age and gender femoral fracture and deep infection rates remained significant for both (p<0.05). Adjusting for age, gender as well as ASA only remained significant for infection (P<0.05). The reduction in revision for dislocation followed the registry trend for the use of larger femoral heads and cross linked polyethylene. The rise in early periprosthetic femoral fracture rates was directly associated (p<0.001) with the increased use of uncemented femoral prostheses. The worrying increase in infection rate was unexplained on the basis of registry data alone. It was related to ASA grade but the overall ratios of ASA grades remained consistent over the 15 years

Aims: Dislocation is one of the commonest complications following total hip arthroplasty. A significant proportion of these patients go on to have recurrent dislocations. Many factors have been identified as contributing to the risk of dislocation but treatment of recurrent dislocation is challenging. The use of semicaptive acetabular components is a potential solution to the problem of recurrent dislocation but there are few studies into the efficacy of these implants. Methods: Patients who underwent revision of their total hip arthroplasty to a semi-captive socket at the Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield between 2001 and March 2006 were studied. A proforma was designed and data was obtained from patients’ medical records. The number of dislocations both prior to revision to a semi-captive component and the following revision to a semi-captive acetabular component were recorded including the method of reduction Reasons for revision and the number and reasons for previous revisions were noted. Results: Average time of follow up was 22 months (range 2 months – 5 years 1 month). Following revision of total hip arthroplasty to a semi-captive component, 78% suffered no further dislocations. Of those patients who went on to redislocate, three went on to have recurrent dislocations and all were reduced by closed reduction. One patient redislocated and underwent a second revision to a semi-captive acetabular component, which was successful and underwent no further dislocations. Discussion. The results of this study show the use of semicaptive acetabular components in revision surgery for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty to be a highly effective solution to the problem of recurrent dislocation

Background

A few patients undergoing a total hip replacement need a subsequent revision of the cup. In some of these cases, the treating surgeon may be confronted with Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures (UPIC). The exact incidence of this finding is unclear. Moreover, it is unknown what the clinical outcome of these patients is when the stem is left in situ. The aim of our study was to describe the incidence of UPIC in patients undergoing cup revision and to determine the need for total revision in this patient group during follow-up.

The aim was to identify the acetabular center, fix the acetabular implant, and reconstruct the hip rotation center using the residual Harris fossa and acetabular notch as anatomical markers during revision hip arthroplasty. Osteolysis is commonly found in the acetabulum during hip arthroplasty revision. It causes extensive defects and malformation of the anatomical structure, making correct fixation of a hip prosthesis difficult. We studied the relations of the anatomical positions between the Harris fossa and acetabular notch and the acetabular center (Fig. 1). Vertical distance from the hip rotation center to the teardrop connection and horizontal distance from the hip rotation center to the teardrop were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Vertical distance increased from 14.22±3.39 mm preoperatively to 32.64±4.51 mm postoperatively (t=3.65, P<0.05) and the horizontal distance from 25.13±3.46 mm to 32.87±4.73 mm (t=2.72, P<0.05). Altogether, 28 patients underwent revision hip arthroplasty based on the Paprosky classification for bone loss. The anatomical hip center was identified using the residual Harris fossa and acetabular notch as anatomical markers during revision hip arthroplasty. Based on these relations, we were able to place the hip prosthesis correctly. After surgery, restoration of the anatomical hip center was accomplished based on data obtained from radiographs(Fig.2 and Fig.3).

Fifty-five patients undergoing isolated acetabular revisions in fifty-seven hips were available for review. In thirty-three of fifty-seven hips there was no significant acetabular deficiency; of the remaining twenty-four hips twenty underwent allograft reconstruction and four autogenous bone grafting. Mean follow-up was four years with a range of three to seven years; there have been no femoral loosening, and three further surgical procedures for hip instability. All acetabular components at last review were soundly fixed with the exception of one patient who underwent excision arthroplasty at twelve months for deep infection.

The purpose of this study was to review the functional outcome and the fate of the femoral stem and revised acetabular component following isolated ace-tabular revision.

Findings of the current study demonstrate that isolated acetabular revision does not compromise the final functional nor radiographic outcome in acetabular revision in appropriately selected patients; the fate of the femoral component is not adversely influenced by this procedure.

There is no need to remove the femoral component at the time of acetabular revision if the femoral component is well fixed and stable by pre- and intra-operative assessment.

Prospectively entered data on fifty-seven hips (fifty-five patients) who have undergone isolated acetabular revision without femoral revision was available for review. All patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively on an annual basis by means of physical examination, x-ray, SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires.

In thirty-three of fifty-seven hips there was no significant acetabular deficiency; of the remaining twenty-four hips, one had a segmental defect, thirteen had a cavitary defect and ten had a combined segmental and cavitary defect. Osteolysis existed in the proximal femur of two hips.

Bone grafting in twenty-four hips consisted of morselized allograft in nine; combined structural and morselized allograft used in eleven and autogenous bone used in four acetabular defects. Autogenous bone grafting was done in two femoral osteolytic lesions.

Mean follow-up was four years with a range of three to seven years. The mean duration of arthroplasty prior to revision was fourteen years (range four to twenty-three years).

There were no nerve palsies, vascular injuries or intra-operative fractures in this patient group. All ace-tabular components at latest review were soundly fixed with the exception of one patient who underwent excision arthroplasty at twelve months for deep infection. Twenty-one of the twenty-four hips with bone grafting demonstrated positive radiographic signs of incorporation; the remaining threehips have a stable interface but no evidence of bone ingrowth. Three of the fifty-seven hips presented with hip dislocations after revision arthroplasty; two were managed by closed reduction; the third by open reduction and soft tissue repair.

Total hip replacements (THRs) are performed by surgeons at various stages in their training, with varying levels of senior supervision. There is a balance between protecting training opportunities for the next generation of surgeons, while limiting the exposure of patients to unnecessary risk during the training process. The aim of this study was to examine the association between surgeon grade, the senior supervision of trainees, and the risk of revision following THR.

We included 603 474 primary THRs recorded in the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man (NJR) between 2003 and 2016 for an indication of osteoarthritis. Exposures were the grade of the surgeon (consultant or trainee), and whether trainees were supervised by a scrubbed consultant or not. Outcomes were all-cause revision, the indication for revision, and the temporal variation in risk of revision (all up to 10 years). Net failure was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and adjusted analyses used Cox regression and flexible parametric survival analysis (adjusted for patient, operative, and unit level factors).

There was no association between surgeon grade and all-cause revision up to 10 years (crude hazard ratio (HR) 0·999, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.936–1.065; p=0.966); a finding which persisted with adjusted analysis. Adjusted analysis demonstrated an association between trainees operating without supervision by a scrubbed consultant and an increase in all-cause revision (HR 1.100, 95% CI 1.002–1.207; p=0.045). There was an association between the trainee-performed THRs and revision due to instability (crude HR 1.143, 95% CI, 1.007–1.298; p=0.039). However, this was not observed in fully adjusted models, or when trainees were supervised by a scrubbed consultant.

Within the current training system in the United Kingdom, trainees achieve comparable outcomes to consultant surgeons when supervised by a scrubbed consultant. Revision rates are higher when trainees are not supervised by a scrubbed consultant but remain within internationally recognised acceptable limits.

There is evidence that recommends the retention of a well-fixed cement mantle at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. The cement-cement interface has been proven to have greater shear strength than a new bone-cement interface after removing a well-fixed cement mantle. This study reviewed a series of acetabular revision procedures with a minimum 2-year follow-up where the original cement mantle was left intact. From 1988 to 2004, 60 consecutive cement-in-cement revisions of the acetabular component were performed at our institution. Outcome was based on functional assessment using the Oxford, Charnley, and Harris scoring systems as well as radiographic analysis using the DeLee and Charnley criteria.

In total 60 procedures were performed in 60 patients (40 female and 20 male), whose mean age at surgery was 75 years (range 40 to 99 years). 80% were performed for recurrent dislocation, 13.3% during femoral component revision, 5% for acetabular component wear, and 1.7% for pain. No case was lost to follow-up.

There was one re-revision for aseptic cup loosening at 7 years, with 1 further case of radiological loosening identified at the latest review. There were 6 further cases of dislocation 4 of which were treated with further in-cement revisions. All other cases showed well-fixed components on radiographic analysis and no evidence of failure at the most recent follow up.

The cement-in-cement technique already has a good body of evidence based on revision of the femoral component and this study shows that the technique can be applied to acetabular revisions as well with good functional and radiological results in the short to medium term.

Purpose

To assess acetabular component fixation by bone ongrowth onto a titanium plasma sprayed surface as used in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone defects, a common finding in revision surgery, and their relation to outcome were also investigated.

There is evidence that recommends the retention of a well-fixed cement mantle at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. The cement-cement interface has been proven to have a greater shear strength than a new bone-cement interface after removing the old cement mantle.

This study reviewed a series of acetabular revision procedures with a minimum 2 year follow-up where the original cement mantle was left intact. From 1988 to 2004, 61 consecutive cement-in-cement revisions of the acetabular component were performed at our institution. Outcome was based on functional assessment using the Oxford, Charnley, and Harris scoring systems as well as radiographic analysis using the DeLee and Charnley criteria.

In total 61 procedures were performed in 59 patients (40 female and 19 male), whose mean age at surgery was 75 years (range 40 to 99 years). 47 hips (77%) were performed for recurrent dislocation, 12 for polyethylene wear associated with other reasons for revision (aseptic stem loosening in 8, stem fracture in 2, femoral periprosthetic fracture in 1, subluxation in 1), 1 for unexplained pain, and 1 for disarticulation (intraprosthetic dislocation) of a constrained liner. No case was lost to follow-up. There was a significant improvement in the functional scores from the pre-operative status with the patients maintaining a low level of pain. There was one re-revision for aseptic cup loosening at 7 years, with 1 further case of radiological loosening identified at the latest review. There were 6 further cases of dislocation 4 of which were treated with further in-cement revisions. All other cases showed well-fixed components on radiographic analysis and no evidence of failure at the most recent follow up.

The cement-in-cement revision technique can be used in selected cases of acetabular revision surgery, providing satisfactory functional outcomes backed up by good radiographic results. Blood loss and surgical time are also significantly decreased.

Hip simulator studies with ceramic-on-metal (COM) predicted less wear than metal-on-metal (MOM: Isaac. 2009). While clinical evidence is scant, two COM case reports described pseudotumors with adverse cup positioning (Deshmukh 2012, Koper 2014). It would appear that our Korean case report is the first to describe pseudotumor formation in well-positioned COM arthroplasty and including detailed failure analysis. A 50-year old female (active salesperson) had bilateral avascular necrosis of her femoral heads. A left metal-on-polyethylene (MPE) hip was performed at outside institution in 2003. At our 3-yrs evaluation, radiographs showed well-functioning MPE hip. Five years later she complained of gradual left-hip pain (2011). Radiographs and CT scan demonstrated wear, osteolysis and loosening of both components. The revision in 2011 was by COM (Fig. 1), using S-ROM stem/sleeve, 36mm ceramic head (Biolox-delta), a CoCr liner and 54mm shell (Pinnacle: Depuy Inc). Cup inclination and anteversion were considered appropriate at 45° and 20° respectively; femoral anteversion of 15° was also appropriate.

At 1-yr follow-up patient complained of mild discomfort in left COM hip (2012). Range of motion was painless and normal. Examination revealed a soft, non-tender swelling (2×3cm) in left inguinal region with no inflammation and radiographs were normal (Fig. 1a). One month later the patient complained of left hip pain, the previously noted swelling had increased in size, and she started to limp. Radiographs showed cup migration with increased inclination. CT scans showed a circumscribed lesion extending into iliopsoas region (Fig 2). Serum cobalt and chromium levels were high at 2.4 and 22.5µg/ L, respectively.

At revision the pseudotumor and surrounding inflamed synovium was excised. The cystic soft-tissue swelling (stained black) extended into the joint (Fig. 2a). The ceramic head showed a large “black stripe” across the dome (Fig 2b). The cup was loose while the femoral stem was well fixed. Operative cultures of soft tissues and joint fluid were negative for infection while histopathology was consistent for metallosis (Fig. 3). Aggressive debridement was carried out, acetabular defects were filled with bone graft. Revision incorporated 32mm ceramic head (Biolox-delta), highly cross-linked liner and 52mm trabecular-metal shell (Depuy). Functionally the patient has continued to improve. By 6 months, serum ion concentrations decreased to Co:1.3 and Cr:2.54µg/ L with most recent ion levels lower still (Co:0.66 and Cr:0.42µg/ L).

Ceramic head surfaces showed normal wear appearance. The large gray stripe identified on the highly polished dome contained Co and Cr metal-transfer from the CoCr liner (Fig. 2b). Thin gray stripes on equatorial head regions (x4 rougher than dome) represented contamination by Ti, Al and V, typical of adverse impingement against Ti6Al4V neck (Clarke 2013). There was a 100–150um defect on rim of CoCr liner as a result of impingement. Cup out-of-roundness was 476um compared to only 7um for ceramic head, thus cup wear dominated at 25–30mm³ volume. This case report was illustrative of the unpredictable and seldom diagnosed risk of habitual cup-to-neck impingement and the risk of relying on pristine simulator studies to predict outcomes in novel THA bearings.

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction: As a consequence of the rising prevalence of diabetes worldwide, an increasing proportion of diabetic THR patients may be expected in coming years. Diabetes research on postoperative complications among arthroplasty patients is limited. We evaluated the extent to which diabetes affect the revision rate due to aseptic loosening, deep infection and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Material and Methods: We used the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (DHR) to identify all primary THR patients operated on during the period from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2005. The presence of diabetes among THA patients was identified by using The Danish National Registry of Patients and The Danish National Drug Prescription Database. We used Poisson regression analyses, to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for patients with diabetes compared to patients without diabetes, both crude and adjusted for potentially confounding factors.

Results: We identified 57 575 first primary THR patients in DHR, of which 3 278 (5.7%) were with diabetes and 54 297 (94.3%) without diabetes. An adjusted RR for revision due to deep infection of 1.45 (CI: 1.00–2.09) was found for THA diabetic patients compared to patients without diabetes. The RR was particularly high for THA patients with diabetes less than five years (RR was 1.71 (CI: 1.24–32.34), with the presence of diabetes related comorbidites prior THA (RR was 2.35 (CI: 1.39–3.98) and diabetes related complications (RR was 1.88 (CI: 1.17–3.03).

Conclusion. The patient and the surgeon should be aware of the relative increased risk of revision due to deep infection following THA as compared with the risk in THA patients without diabetes.

Purpose: There is evidence that recommends the retention of a well-fixed cement mantle at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. The cement-cement interface has been proven to have a greater shear strength than a new bone-cement interface after removing the old cement mantle.

Method: This study reviewed a series of acetabular revision procedures with a minimum 2-year follow-up where the original cement mantle was left intact. From 1988 to 2004, 63 consecutive cement-in-cement revisions of the acetabular component were performed at our institution. Outcome was based on functional assessment using the Oxford, Charnley, and Harris scoring systems as well as radiographic analysis using the DeLee and Charnley criteria.

Results: In total 63 procedures were performed in 61 patients (40 female and 21 male), whose mean age at surgery was 74 years (range 40 to 99 years). 47 hips (75%) were performed for recurrent dislocation, 13 for aseptic loosening, 1 for pain, 1 for excessive shortening, and 1 for disarticulation of a constrained liner. No case was lost to follow-up. There was a significant improvement in the functional scores from the pre-operative status with the patients maintaining a low level of pain. There was one re-revision for aseptic cup loosening at 7 years, with 1 further case of radiological loosening identified at the latest review. There were 6 further cases of dislocation 5 of which were treated with further in-cement revisions. All other cases showed well-fixed components on radiographic analysis and no evidence of failure at the most recent follow up.

Conclusion: The cement-in-cement revision technique can be used in selected cases of acetabular revision surgery, providing satisfactory functional outcomes backed up by good radiographic results. Blood loss and surgical time are also significantly decreased.

Purpose: This multicentric retrospective study was conducted to search for indications of femoral revision with a custom-made non-cemented implant.

Material and methods: We collected files on femoral revisions using custom-made implants among our working group and among surgeons having a certain experience between 1989 and 1991. Twenty-one patients (13 men and 10 women), mean age 50.1 years (24–81) were operated. This was the first revision for 14, the second for six, and the third for two. Mean follow-up was 35.4 years. The implant was coated with hydroxyapatite in the proximal zone with optional distal locking except for the first cases. The implant was used when the usual implants were poorly adapted. Data acquisition was achieved with previous calibrated computed tomography. The problem was to distinguish residual bone from cement or the prior implant. Information was exchanged between the engineer and the surgeon in order to define the stem shape and anchorage. Regular clinical follow-up was performed, noting the Postel Merle d’Aubligné score. The radiographic assessment focused on the absence of prosthesis descent and lucent lines.

Results: The PMA score improved from 9.6 (6–14; 2.4; 4.26; 2.91) to 14 (8–18; 4.61; 5.05; 4.25). Complications were dislocation in three hips, one requiring cup replacement and the other neck replacement. Early descent of the femoral stem was also noted in one hip which required revision. Late descent at 13 years was managed by a simple procedure in one hip (SOFCOT stage I).

Discussion: The early failures were related to the severity of the initial lesions (or rather their underestimation) and to defective initial distal stabilisation. Late failures resulted from the absence of bioreactive coating. We have had no experience with impacted grafting. The indication for custom-made implants are exceptional (less than 2% of our revisions) and can be divided into four categories: extramedullary (very long neck/varus) the implant avoiding the use of balls; extrapolation (femur too small or too large requiring under- or oversized implant); dysmorphism (excessive curvature, osteotomy or fracture sequelae, narrow metaphysic with wide diaphysis); gap filling (weight-bearing zone).

Conclusion: The advantage of a custom-made implant is the choice of anchorage and the simplification of the operative procedure. It is often the only solution in complex situations but requires close collaboration with the engineer (virtual intervention) and implies significant cost.

Aim: To review the results and complications of revision of the socket in total hip arthroplasty using rim mesh and impaction allograft for reconstruction of segmental and complex defects

Patients & Methods: 43 patients who underwent a revision of the socket in 47 total hip replacements were retrospectively reviewed over a 3 ½ year period. All the patients had segmental or complex bone loss around the acetabulum which was reconstructed using Stryker Howmedica rim mesh, impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup through the posterior approach. Final analysis included clinical review at latest follow-up, radiological evaluation to assess graft incorporation and socket migration and any other complications.

Results: All patients were followed up for a mean period of 14.2 months (range: 2 months-33 months). The mean age at surgery was 58.2 yrs. There were 14 males and 29 females. This was a re-revision in 5 patients. The most common indication for revision was aseptic socket loosening with migration in 39 patients. One patient had a two stage revision for infection, one had socket fracture, and two patients had collapse of bulk graft and socket migration. Superior segmental defect of varying sizes were present in all patients, in addition to which there were central deficiencies, anterior and/or posterior column deficiencies and complex defects. 4 patients had post-operative dislocation, 1 had significant limb length discrepancy, 1 had infection and 1 had transient sciatic nerve palsy. At the latest follow-up all patients had good graft incorporation and no socket migration.

Conclusion: Rim mesh helps in containing a segmental defect of acetabulum provides good immediate support for impacted graft and socket and has produced good early results. However, long term follow-up is necessary to determine the outcome of this construct.

Purpose of the study: Locked implants have yielded favourable results for femoral bone reconstruction for revision total hip arthroplasty, but defective integration has also been reported due to insufficient bioactive coating. The purpose of this work was to evaluate a locked pivot with a two-third proximal hydroxyapatite coating.

Material and methods: From 1996 to 2007, 158 femoral implants (Linea™) were implanted for hip arthroplasty revision. The 143 cases with more than one year follow-up were reviewed (14 deaths, 1 lost to follow-up); 83 revisions for aseptic loosening, 41 periprosthetic fractures, 19 revisions in an infected context. Patients were reviewed retrospectively by a non-operator observer. These were older patients (mean age 68 years, range 31–93) and 36 patients had complex situations requiring at least two prior prostheses; 25% had severe grade 3 or 4 (SOFCOT) bone lesions and 59% diaphyseal damage.

Results: Clinical improvement was significant, the Postel Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 7.7 + 4.3 (0–17) to 15.6 + 2.2 (8–18) at mean 50 months (14–131) (p< 0.001). At last follow-up, 14 patients (10%) reported thigh pain and only seven pivots (5%) had not achieved Engh osteointegration (five with thigh pain two without). There were no fractures. There was on non-union of the femorotomy. According to the Hoffman index, femoral bone regeneration was significant at the metaphyseal and diaphyseal levels. Eighteen of the 19 infections cured, all periprosthetic fractures healed. The implant survival was 88.9% at 91 months (65–96.7%). There were five pivot replacements for non integration and/or thigh pain which resolved in all cases; there were no other pivot replacements. The quality of the metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling was predictive of the quality of the bone fixation of the pivot (p< 0.01).

Discussion: Compared with older models of locked pivots, this implant reduced the rate of thigh pain while allowing constantly satisfactory bone reconstruction. The metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling index is the main factor predictive of clinical and radiological success by favouring osteointegration. Maximal filling, obtained with a full range of implant diameters and lengths, contributes to this good result.

Aim

Very limited information is available regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient reported hip function following treatment for chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection (PJI). Several reviews have not found any clear differences in clinical outcome parameters comparing the most commonly applied treatment strategies for chronic hip PJI. Studies describing patients HRQOL of one-stage and two-stage revision could provide important information regarding patient counselling. The purpose of this study was to investigate HRQOL and patient reported hip function after one-stage revision and two-stage revision in chronic hip PJI.

Purpose: During revision of alumina-on-alumina prostheses, reimplantation of a ceramic head on the former stem raises the risk of head fracture. Furthermore, serious deformation of the metal head has been reported after failure of ceramic-on-ceramic prostheses. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the incidence of these complications and analyse clinical and radiological results of revision for alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties. Material and methods: This consectutive series included 107 patients (74 women and 33 men, mean age 65 years, age range 32–91 years) who underwent 118 revision arthroplasties from 1976 to 1997. The cause in the majority of the cases was isolated non-infected cup loosening (80%) or ceramic implant fracture (4%). There were 72 cemented alumina cups, 38 screwed cups, six press-fit metal-backed cups, and two massive alumina impacted cups. Cavitary acetabular osteolysis was present in 67% of the cases. The cup was replaced alone in 94 cases (80%). The implanted cup was a polyethylene cup in 93 cases and an alumina cup in 25. When the femoral stem was left in place, a new ceramic head was implanted in 49 cases (39 alumina, 10 zircone). The alumina head was replaced by a metal head in 18 cases. Results: Four early dislocations and two infections were noted. Mean follow-up after revision surgery was 67 months. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up. Sixteen patients required revision surgery, ten of them for repeated cup loosening. At last follow-up (mean 61 months), there were no failures among the 49 ceramic heads implanted on a stem left in place. No revisions were required for polyethylene cup wear or metal head wear. In all, 72 hips were evaluated at a minimum two years follow-up. The functional score at last follow-up was 15.2±3.5. Seven-year actuarial survival was 95.5% taking revision of non-infected revision as the endpoint. Discussion and conclusion: Analysis of the results shows that acetabular loosening is the main cause of revision of alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties. The femoral stem was loosened in only nine cases and could be preserved in 80% of the cases. Replacement of an alumina-on-alumina couple with a metal-on-polyethylene couple does not appear to be a contraindication in this series

Aims

Advances in surgical technique and implant design may influence the incidence and mechanism of failure resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of the current study was to characterize aetiologies requiring rTHA, and to determine whether temporal changes existed in these aetiologies over a ten-year period.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). Computer-navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty show evidence-supported survivorship advantages and are used widely. The aim of this study was to determine the revision outcome of hip commercially available navigation technologies.

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from January 2016 to December 2020 included all primary THA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA). Procedures using the Intellijoint HIP® navigation were identified and compared to procedures inserted using ‘other’ computer navigation systems and to all non-navigated procedures. The cumulative percent revision (CPR) was compared between the three groups using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and gender. A prosthesis specific analysis was also performed.

There were 1911 procedures that used the Intellijoint® system, 4081 used ‘other’ computer navigation, and 160,661 were non-navigated. The all-cause 2-year CPR rate for the Intellijoint HIP® system was 1.8% (95% CI 1.2, 2.6), compared to 2.2% (95% CI 1.8, 2.8) for other navigated and 2.2% (95% CI 2.1, 2.3) for non-navigated cases. A prosthesis specific analysis identified the Paragon/Acetabular Shell THAs combined with the Intellijoint HIP® system as having a higher (3.4%) rate of revision than non-navigated THAs (HR = 2.00 (1.01, 4.00), p=0.048).

When this outlier combination was excluded, the Intellijoint® system group demonstrated a two-year CPR of 1.3%. There was no statistical difference in the CPR between the three groups before or after excluding Paragon/Acetabular Shell system.

The preliminary data presented demonstrate no statistical difference in all cause revision rates when comparing the Intellijoint HIP® THA navigation system with ‘other’ navigation systems and ‘non-navigated’ approaches for primary THAs performed for OA. The current sample size remains too small to permit meaningful subgroup statistical comparisons.

Introduction

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious problem and requires great effort and cost for its treatment. Treatment options may vary from resection arthroplasty, retention of prosthesis with debridement, one stage revision and two stage revision with handmade antibiotic impregnated cement spacer or with prefabricated antibiotic loaded cement spacer. Two stage revision remains the gold standard for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). This study was aimed to find the efficacy and cost effectiveness of handmade antibiotic impregnated articulating cement spacer over commercially available prefabricated antibiotic loaded cement spacer for the treatment of deep PJI of hip prosthesis and to evaluate its functional outcome.