Aims. Avulsion of the proximal
Avulsion of the proximal
Proximal
Objectives. The objective of this study was to determine if the use of fascia lata as a tendon regeneration guide (placed into the tendon canal following harvesting the semitendinosus tendon) would improve the incidence of tissue regeneration and prevent fatty degeneration of the semitendinosus muscle. Materials and Methods. Bilateral semitendinosus tendons were harvested from rabbits using a tendon stripper. On the inducing graft (IG) side, the tendon canal and semitendinosus tibial attachment site were connected by the fascia lata, which was harvested at the same width as the semitendinosus tendon. On the control side, no special procedures were performed. Two groups of six rabbits were killed at post-operative weeks 4 and 8, respectively. In addition, three healthy rabbits were killed to obtain normal tissue. We evaluated the incidence of tendon tissue regeneration, cross-sectional area of the regenerated tendon tissue and proportion of fatty tissue in the semitendinosus muscle. Results. At post-operative week 8, the distal end of the regenerated tissue reached the vicinity of the tibial insertion on the control side in two of six specimens. On the IG side, the regenerated tissue maintained continuity with the tibial insertion in all specimens. The cross-sectional area of the IG side was significantly greater than that of the control side. The proportion of fatty tissue in the semitendinosus muscle on the IG side was comparable with that of the control side, but was significantly greater than that of the normal muscle. Conclusions. Tendon tissue regenerated with the fascia lata graft was thicker than naturally occurring regenerated tissue. However, the proportion of fatty tissue in the semitendinosus muscle was greater than that of normal muscle. Cite this article: K. Tabuchi, T. Soejima, H. Murakami, K. Noguchi, N. Shiba, K. Nagata. Inducement of tissue regeneration of harvested
Abstract. Purpose. Since arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) started, the use of peroneus longus grafts for primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) was never thought of as there is very scant literature on it. So, our study aims to compare the functional outcome and complications in patients with ACL injury managed by ACLR with peroneus longus tendon (PLT) and
Aims: Patellar instability and painful patellar mal-tracking are common challenging conditions faced by a knee surgeon. Our purpose was to describe an arthroscopy assisted method of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to address these conditions present our results using this modified technique. Materials &
Method: Between April 2001 and December 2003, 22 knees in 20 consecutive patients underwent arthroscopically assisted MPFL reconstruction using an autologous
Introduction and Aims: To describe the arthroscopically assisted technique of medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction using a
Recurrent patellar instability and anterior knee pain is a common problem after patellar dislocation. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) which contributes 40–80% of the total restraining forces is either attenuated or ruptured in these patients. Various techniques have been described in reconstructing this MPFL using
To share our results following Medial Patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar instability problems using ipsilateral semitendinosus graft anchored to the patella and the medial femoral condyle using biotenodesis screws. Study design and methods: 35 patients were assessed with a mean follow up of 18 months. All patients had preoperative true lateral knee x-ray, MRI or CT scan to look at trochlear dysplasia and the sulcus tuberosity distance. They all under went MPFL reconstruction using ipsilateral semitendinosus tendon. Two patients had sulcus tuberosity distance greater than 20 mm and they under went a tibial tubercle transfer in addition. Two patients had trochlear dysplasia and hence a trochlearplasty was also done. In skeletally mature patients the
This prospective longitudinal study compared the results of isolated endoscopic ACL reconstruction utilising 4-strand
Purpose: To determine whether the tendon harvester can influence harvested tendon characteristics and soft tissue disruption. Summary: We compared two harvesters with regards to the length of tendon obtained and soft tissue disruption during
Purpose of the study: The issue of which graft to choose for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still a matter of debate. An analysis of the literature reveals the difficulty encountered when performing comparative trials. It is also difficult to demonstrate significant differences with results obtained with an insufficient number of patients. We propose here a meta-analysis in order to combine the results obtained with different comparative studies. Material and methods: The literature search (Medline 1990–2005) was based on the following selection criteria: ACL reconstruction, patellar tendon (PT), gracilis and semitendinous (four-strand hamstring) reconstruction and comparative prospective study. Studies were retained with: >
30 patients per group, minimum follow-up 24 months, IKDC score. Evaluation criteria retained were: anterior pain, resumed activity, IKDC score, differential laxity. The relative risk (RR) statistical method with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied. Means were calculated and the chi-square and z-tests were applied. Results: Thirteen studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. These studies had included more than 1300 transplants. Mean rate of anterior pain was 23.2% with PR and 17.3% with hamstring reconstructions. The RR was 0.73 with a CI different from 1. The difference was significant. Resumption of sports activities at the same level, subjective assessment, number of failures, and overall IKDC score were not statistically different between the two types of transplants. The IKDC laxity score was not different but the residual maximal manual differential laxity was greater in the hamstring patients than in the patellar patients in 80% of the cases. Conclusion: At the observed follow-up, free grafting with a four-strand
Aim: To compare, in a longitudinal study, the clinical outcomes of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either a four-strand
Hamstring grafts have been associated with reduced strength, donor site pain and muscle strains following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR). Traditional graft fixation methods required both semitendinosus and gracilis tendons to achieve a graft of sufficient length and diameter, but newer techniques allow for shorter, broad single tendon grafts. This study seeks to compare the outcomes between Single Tendon (ST) and Dual Tendon (DT) ACLR, given there is no prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the literature comparing outcomes between these options. In this ongoing RCT: (ANZ Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN126200000927921) patients were recruited and randomised into either ST or DT groups. All anaesthetic and surgical techniques were uniform aside from graft technique and tibial fixation. 13 patients were excluded at surgery as their ST graft did not achieve a minimum 8mm diameter. 70 patients (34 ST, 36DT) have been assessed at 6 months, using PROMS including IKDC2000, Lysholm and Modified Cincinnati Knee, visual analog scale for pain frequency (VAS-F) and severity (VAS-S), dedicated donor site morbidity score, KT-1000 assessment, and isokinetic strength. Graft diameters were significantly lesser in the ST group compared to the DT group (8.44mm/9.11mm mean difference [MD],-0.67mm; P<0.001). There was a significant and moderate effect in lower donor site morbidity in the ST group compared to the DT group (effect size [ES], 0.649; P = .01). No differences between groups were observed for knee laxity in the ACLR limb (P=0.362) or any of the patient-reported outcome measures (P>0.05). Between-group differences were observed for hamstrings strength LSI favouring the ST group, though these were small-to-moderate and non-significant (ES, 0.351; P = .147). ST (versus DT) harvest results in significantly less donor site morbidity and this is the first prospective RCT to determine this. There were no differences between ST and DT hamstring ACLR were observed in PROMs, knee laxity and hamstring strength. Younger female patients tend to have inadequate single tendon size to produce a graft of sufficient diameter, and alternative techniques should be considered. Further endpoints include radiological analysis, longer term donor site morbidity, revision rates and return to sport and will continue to be presented in the future.
The optimal method of tibial fixation when using a hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is unclear. This study aimed to compare the risk of revision ACL reconstruction between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side. Prospective data on primary ACL reconstructions recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry between April 2014 and December 2019 were analyzed. Only patients with a hamstring tendon autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side were included. The rate of revision ACL reconstruction was compared between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side. Univariate Chi-Square test and multivariate Cox regression was performed to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for age, gender, time-to-surgery, activity at the time of injury, number of graft strands and graft diameter. 6145 cases were analyzed, of which 59.6% were fixed with a suspensory device on the tibial side (n = 3662), 17.6% fixed with an interference screw with a sheath (n = 1079) and 22.8% fixed with an interference screw without a sheath (n = 1404). When compared to suspensory devices (revision rate = 3.4%), a higher risk of revision was observed when using an interference screw with a sheath (revision rate = 6.2%, adjusted HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.20 – 3.52, p = 0.009) and without a sheath (revision rate = 4.6%, adjusted HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.02 – 3.23, p = 0.044). The number of graft strands and a graft diameter of ≥8 mm did not influence the risk of revision. When reconstructing the ACL with a hamstring tendon autograft, the use of an interference screw, with or without a sheath, on the tibial side has a higher risk of revision when compared to a suspensory device.
The aim of our study was to examine the outcome of ACL reconstruction by using four strand hamstring tendon autografts.
5 patients had laxity >
3mm when compared to the healthy knee by using the KT-1000 arhthrometric testing. 2 of the latter patients complained of a feeling of knee joint instability which occurred due to inaccurate positioning of the femoral tunnel. In 2 cases the transfix pins were displaced and removed on the 4th and 15th post-operative month. The tunnel expansion was measured by an X-Ray or a CT scan. The tibial tunnel expansion was 0–2.5mm (mean 1.2) or 18% and the femoral tunnel expansion was 0–3 mm (mean 1.4) or 26%. 8 patients reported mild pain which did not restrict their activities. A 5 degree loss of extension was noticed in one patient who continues physiotherapy. 28 of the above patients suffered also from a meniscal injury that was managed arthroscopically.
The Purpose of this study was to evaluate hamstring strength after autogenous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction with emphasis on deeper knee flexion angles. A comparison of hamstring strength between patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus(ST), and those with semitendinosus and Gracilis(STG) tendons was conducted. Sixty patients were prospectively followed after undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery. Forty patients received a ST graft, and 20 patients had a STG graft. All patients had standard IKDC subjective knee evaluation completed, and had bilateral hamstring strengths tested using isokinetic testing with a Cybex Orthotron machine. In addition, a hand held Microfet dynamometer was used to measure hamstring strengths at deeper knee flexion angles at six, 12, and 24 months.Purpose
Method